The present invention generally relates to fit and retention systems for headgear, especially protective headgear. Specifically, it relates to fit and retention systems for protective headgear which do not require a chinstrap.
The prior art contains many examples of headgear fit and retention systems. Headgear fit and retention systems are intended to keep the headgear on the head during use, maintain fit and comfort while in use, and allow the user to easily put on and take off the headgear when desired.
Fit and retention systems all must deal with the basic characteristics of the human head. These characteristics include the generally spheroidal shape, attachment of the head at the neck, and the various features such as the shape and location of eyes and ears, hair, etc. In addition the systems must deal with variations among users in head size and head shape. For example, some individuals may have prominent frontal bones, occipital bones, or parietal eminences, while others may not.
For certain kinds of headgear, retention and fit issues are relatively inconsequential because the existing retention and fitting systems work relatively well. Knit winter hats generally fall into this category. The headgear is lightweight and conforms easily to variations in head size and shape. Therefore, many users with different head shapes and sizes can comfortably wear the same kind and size of hat. Moreover, knit winter hats typically remain on the head under quite demanding circumstances such as in skiing, sledding, or other vigorous activities.
For other kinds of headgear, retention and fit issues are relatively inconsequential because it is not critical that the headgear remain on the head. A baseball cap falls in this category. In many instances, a baseball cap is worn during leisure activities where retention is not tested. When it is worn in more demanding circumstances such as a baseball game, retention may not be critical because loss of a cap does not pose a danger to the user. Therefore, users may be more willing to tolerate shortcomings in the retention and fit system.
For many kinds of protective headgear, fit and retention issues can be critical. For example, if a bicycle or football helmet falls off while a user is engaged in one of those activities, the results could be catastrophic. Therefore, it is essential that secure systems be employed to ensure helmets stay on the user while engaged in those activities.
With most kinds of protective headgear, however, devising fit and retention systems is a difficult endeavor. Many activities require significant protection and therefore headgear may become bulkier and heavier. In addition some materials used in the construction of such helmets may be hard and stiff such as helmet shells. Such materials make it difficult to conform a helmet to the shapes of the heads of different users.
Protective helmets use various means to improve retention and fit. For those with hard and stiff shells, compressible padding, padding inserts, and adjustable suspension systems are some of the means by which different head sizes can be accommodated. Football, hockey, bicycle helmets, and construction hard hats would fall into this category. For headgear with soft flexible shells, such as the headgear used in boxing, the martial arts, or soccer, the shape of the entire piece of headgear can be altered with, for example, adjustable length straps to help conform it to the shape of the head.
In many instances, however, additional retention means such as chinstraps become necessary. Chinstraps typically attach near the edges of the helmet close to the ears and either pass under the chin or over the chin. A fastening system such as a buckle or snap allows the user to fasten and unfasten the chinstrap.
While chinstraps may help retain a helmet on the head, chinstraps can pose problems. First, chinstraps may heighten risk by increasing the rigidity of the head protection system. Forces applied to the head at angular vectors may cause the helmet and the head to rotate. Significant rotational forces can harm both the brain and the neck. An inflexible chinstrap therefore may contribute to injury by placing additional strain on the head as it rotates.
Second, chinstraps often require adjustment for proper fit. In many instances such adjustments may be difficult and inconvenient. An improperly adjusted chinstrap may, for example, allow the helmet to move too much when subjected to a force thereby exposing an unprotected portion of the head to a blow. This is especially a problem with those chinstraps that require the user to adjust the chinstrap each time the headgear is worn.
Third, chinstraps are often uncomfortable or inconvenient. Chinstraps that run over the chin usually require a cup to fit on the chin. A chin-cup may restrict the jaw and limit activities such as speech. A chinstrap running under the chin, over the neck, and over the thorax may cause discomfort during normal use and may pose a danger during an accident.
Finally, even properly adjusted chinstraps may do little to prevent minor shifts in the helmet during normal use. These minor shifts can be very bothersome for activities, for example, that require unimpeded sight.
Various means have been attempted to improve fit and retention to overcome the shortcomings of systems that rely primarily on the chinstrap. Doing so often requires balancing fit, retention, and comfort as an improvement in one of these attributes tends to come at the expense of another of the attributes. With almost any headgear, retention can be improved by simply making the headgear fit tighter. For headgear such as knit winter hats or winter headbands this does not typically pose a problem. A knit winter hat can fit relatively tight without causing discomfort. The lightness, elasticity, and conformability of such headgear are likely reasons for this.
For many kinds of protective headgear, however, creating a tighter fit results in discomfort. An American football helmet with a tight fit can be very uncomfortable. The bulk, inelasticity of the headgear structure, and the pressure points created where padding is compressed to fit variations on the head's surface could be causes for this.
Alternatives to simply tightening the fit have been developed. Many bicycle helmets, for example, have devices that cradle the occipital bone. These systems are not intended to eliminate the chinstrap but are intended to prevent minor shifts during normal use and to reserve the chinstrap for events such as accidents. These systems rely on a retention system that applies pressure to selected points on the head. In the case of the bicycle helmets with the occipital cradle, what amounts to a triangular retention system is created. In this system pressure is applied to a set of points below the occipital bone, points above the occipital bone, and points approximately in the middle of the forehead. However, these systems still rely on a chinstrap for retention purposes. Therefore there is still a pressure point under the chin.
Alternative fit and retention systems are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,266,827 and 6,349,416 to Lampe et al. The fit and retention systems revealed in these patents can work without chinstraps. These patents describe headgear with adjustable length straps located in positions other than those where chinstraps would typically be located. The adjustable length straps and the structure of the headgear create spaced circular lines of retention. By tightening the adjustable length straps, pressure can be placed on the head at points along one of the circular lines of retention. Unlike a baseball cap, these devices may have two or more circular lines of retention. The circular lines could be located on approximately parallel planes in relation to the head. One circular line of retention could run around the head on one plane ideally positioned below the occipital bone and below the frontal bone but above the brow. Another plane is ideally positioned above the occipital bone and above the frontal bone. While the fit and retention systems disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,266,827 and 6,349,416 to Lampe et al. constitute a significant advance over prior systems, a continuing need exists for further improvements in headgear fit and retention systems.
Generally, the present invention relates to improvements to headguards. A first aspect of the invention is a protective headguard comprising a protective pad and a retention element cooperatively attached to the protective pad wherein the headguard defines at least two separate and distinct tensioned and diametrically intersecting circumferential lines of retention when worn on the head.
A second aspect of the invention is a headguard comprising a protective pad and a pair of separate and distinct, circumferential, diametrically intersecting retention elements attached to the protective pad.
A third aspect of the invention is a headguard comprising (i) a front protective piece having a plurality of separate pads loosely restrained within a pocket whereby each pad may shift within the pocket relative to the other pads, (ii) a rear protective piece, and (iii) a retention element interconnecting the front protective piece and the rear protective piece.
A fourth aspect of the invention is a protective headguard comprising a front protective piece and a rear protective piece wherein the front protective piece and the rear protective piece are pivotally attached to one another at diametrically opposed pivot points such that the front protective piece and the rear protective piece may be independently pivoted about the pivot points.
Objects and advantages of this invention include:
A fit and retention system for headgear that works with many kinds of headgear including protective headgear with pliable and stiff structures.
A fit and retention system for headgear that is adjustable and allows accommodation of different head sizes and head shapes.
A fit and retention system for headgear effective with or without a chinstrap.
A fit and retention system for headgear that allows the headgear to fit snugly with a minimum degree of tension.
A fit and retention system for headgear that allows the headgear to be securely affixed to the head with a minimum degree of tension.
A fit and retention system for headgear that employs at least two “circular lines of retention” (i.e., circular lines around the head that represent the main points of pressure against the head created by the fit and retention system).
A fit and retention system for headgear with circular lines of retention that encircle the head, intersect each other at least twice, and extend from approximately the forehead area to the back of the head.
The invention may be more completely understood in consideration of the following detailed description of various embodiments of the invention in connection with the accompanying drawings.
a is a side elevation of a human head including a depiction of (i) a first great circle located on the mid-sagittal plane, and (ii) a second great circle located on a transverse plane.
b is a top view of the human head shown in
c is a side elevation of a human head including a depiction of (i) a first great circle located on the mid-sagittal plane, and (ii) third circle located on a transverse plane which is not a great circle.
d is a side elevation of a human head including a depiction of first, second fourth and fifth great circles.
a is a side elevation view of a first embodiment of the invention worn on a human head.
b is a back elevation view of the invention shown in
c is a cross-sectional side view of the invention shown in
a is a side elevation view of a second embodiment of the invention worn on a human head.
b is a cross-sectional side view of the invention shown in
Nomenclature
100 Human Head
101 First Circle
102 Center Point
103 Second Circle
104 Forehead
105 Brow
106 Eyes
107 Mouth
108 Back Of Head
109 Back Of Neck
110 Third Circle
111 Fourth Circle
112 Fifth Circle
113 Nose
114 Chin
115 Neck
200 First Embodiment Of Headband
204 Forehead
215 Front Piece
216 Back Piece
217 First Strap
218 Second Strap
219 Front Padding
220 Back Padding
221 Front Covering
222 Back Covering
223 Intersection
224 Temple Area Of Head
225 Ears
226 Occipital Bone
227 Sleeve
228 Frontal Bone
232 First Length Adjustment Means
233 Second Length Adjustment Means
234 Loop
235 Hook And Loop Tab
300 Second Embodiment Of Headband
315 Front Piece
316 Back Piece
317 First Strap
318 Second Strap
321 Front Covering
322 Back Covering
328 Frontal Bone
340 Lower Front Pad
341 Middle Front Pad
342 Upper Front Pad
343 Lower Back Pad
344 Middle Back Pad
345 Upper Back Pad
346 Arrows
347 Gap Between Pads
400 Third Embodiment Of Headband
415 Front Piece
416 Back Piece
432 First Length Adjustment Means
433 Second Length Adjustment Means
450 Front Unit
451 Back Unit
452 Rivet
453 Upper Portion Of Front Unit
454 Lower Portion Of Front Unit
455 Upper Portion Of Back Unit
456 Lower Portion Of Back Unit
500 Fourth Embodiment Of Headgear
510 Padding
517 First Strap
518 Second Strap
560 Gap
600 Fifth Embodiment of Headband
615 Front Piece
616 Back Piece
617 First Strap
618 Second Strap
665 Slot in Front Piece
666 First Slot in Back Piece
667 Second Slot in Back Piece
668 First Hook and Loop Tab
669 Second Hook and Loop Tab
670 Intersection Point
671 Arrows
Definitions
As utilized herein, including the claims, the phrase “length adjustment means” includes any and all means known to those skilled in the art for adjusting the length of a retention cord or strap on headgear including specifically, but not exclusively, (i) cord locks or barrel locks, (ii) ratchet adjusters, (iii) slide adjusters, (iv) ladder locks, (v) cam buckles, (vi) slide buckles, (vii) side-release buckles with slide, (viii) center-release buckles with slide, (ix) bar buckles with series of holes along the length of the strap, (x) combination of loop with hook and loop strap, (xi) combination of loop with strap having a series of snap halves attached along the length of the strap, etc.
As utilized herein, including the claims, the term “loosely” means having relative freedom of movement.
As utilized herein, including the claims, the term “separate” means lack of direct connection.
Construction and Use
a shows a profile of the left side (not numbered) of a human head 100. A first circle 101, represented by dashes, perpendicular to the horizon divides the head 100 into two sides from the middle of the face (unnumbered) to the middle of the back 108 of the head 100. This first circle 101 therefore is located on the mid-sagittal plane (unnumbered). The center point 102 of the first circle 101 is marked.
The first circle 101 and second circle 103 shown in
Although the human head 100 is not a sphere, its shape is more similar to a sphere than it is to other standard shapes. This is especially true if protruding portions of the face such as the nose 113, mouth 107, and chin 114 are excluded as well as the neck 115. In designing a fit and retention system consistent with this invention, excluding these areas of the face and the neck 115 makes sense for two reasons. First, if a chinstrap-like device (not shown) is not going to be used (or is going to be used as a secondary means of retention), the primary retention system could not be located in the chin 114 or neck 115 areas. Second, the typical retention system could not be located on areas of the face; otherwise, vision could be blocked, movement of the mouth 107 could be impeded, and the fit would generally be uncomfortable.
The boundaries of the excluded areas would, for most uses, be as follows. In relation to the forehead 104 shown in
Within this restricted universe, some circular lines of retention will be more optimal than others. The more the circular line of retention deviates from a great circle, the less stable it may be. That is, because a circular line of retention with tension on it will direct pressure inward. A circular line of retention that follows a great circle will direct that pressure toward the center of the sphere. A circular line of retention that follows a circle that is not a great circle will direct pressure at some point other than the center of the sphere. This will tend to make such a circular line of retention less stable. For example, in
d shows an illustration with representations in the form of solid lines of a fourth circle 111 and a fifth circle 112. These circles, like the first circle 101 and second circle 103, are great circles. As individual circular lines of retention around a sphere, both the fourth circle 111 and the fifth circle 112 would be more stable than the third circle 110 when under tension as tension along the fourth circle 111 and fifth circle 112 would tend to pull those circles toward the center of the sphere rather than in a direction toward the top or bottom of the sphere.
If a plurality of circular lines of retention are connected, for example, at points where two circles intersect, those circular lines of retention will be even more stable because another set of points (not shown), forming a plurality of point sets (not shown), will be directing forces toward the center of the sphere.
Since the human head 100 is not typically a sphere, circular lines of retention for a piece of headgear (not shown) cannot generally create true great circles. If, for example, the fourth circle 111 and fifth circle 112 were extended outward or inward sufficiently to accommodate the shape of the head 100 depicted in
a, 2b and 2c show a first embodiment of the invention 200.
The first embodiment of the protective headband 200 shown in
The front piece 215 of the headband 200 depicted in
As shown in
The first strap 217 can run approximately from the forehead 204, above the frontal bone 228 across the temple area 224, and end below the occipital bone 226 at the rear of the head 100. The second strap 218 can run approximately from the forehead 204, below the frontal bone 228 across the temple area 224 and end above the occipital bone 226 at the rear of the head 100. The first strap 217 and second strap 218, can each be equipped with a connecting length adjustment means 232 and 233 at the rear of the head 100, such as a combination of a loop 234 and a hook and loop tab 235.
The first and second straps 217 and 218 cross at approximately the temple area 224 on each side of the head 100. When comparing
The front and back padding 219 and 220 in the front and back pieces 215 and 216 of the headband 200 could be made of many different materials. One such material is foam, which would be suitable for many applications. Similarly, the front and back coverings 221 and 222 for the front and back pieces 215 and 216 of the headband 200 could be made of many different materials. The front and back coverings 221 and 222 could range from fabric entirely encasing the front and back padding 219 and 220, to hard plastic covering the exterior surface (unnumbered) of the front and back padding 219 and 220. Many other kinds of padding and coverings such as those identified in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,266,827, 6,349,416, 6,381,760, and 6,397,399 to Lampe et al. could also be used.
The first and second straps 217 and 218 could be of many different widths and thicknesses and could be made of many different materials. Those depicted in
As shown in
a and 3b depict a headband 300 representing a second embodiment of the invention. Many aspects of the second embodiment of the invention 300 emulate or resemble those of the first embodiment of the invention 200 shown in
The rivets 452 should be configured and arranged to allow the front piece 415 and back piece 416 to move up and down in relation to one another by pivoting about the rivet 452. The rivet 452 could be relatively soft, such as one made from foam or even fabric. The rivet 452 could be eliminated with the front unit 450 and the back unit 451 simply connected at a narrowing point, but such an attachment mechanism is not preferred as such an attachment may restrict movement of the front and back pieces 415 and 416 relative to one another.
The front and back units 450 and 451 could be of many different widths and thicknesses and could be made of many different materials. Those depicted in
The upper portion 453 and lower portion 454 of the front unit 450 and/or the upper portion 455 and lower portion 456 of the back unit 451 can each be equipped with a connecting length adjustment means 432 and 433, such as a combination of a loop (unnumbered) and a hook and loop tab (unnumbered).
Despite the different configuration of the fit and retention system in the third embodiment of the invention 400, the third embodiment of the invention 400 could still rely on the great circle concept. In the case of the third embodiment of the invention 400, one circular line of retention would be formed by a combination of the upper portion 453 of the front unit 450 and the lower portion 456 of the back unit 451. Another circular line of retention would be formed by a combination of the lower portion 454 of the front unit 450 and the upper portion 455 of the back unit 451.
The fifth embodiment of the invention 600 differs from the first embodiment of the invention 200 in several ways. First, the first and second straps 617 and 618 of the fifth embodiment of the invention 600 do not encircle the head 100. As shown in
As with the other embodiments of the invention, the first strap 617 and second strap 618 of the fifth embodiment of the invention 600 can each be equipped with a connecting length adjustment means (not collectively numbered) proximate the rear of the head 100, such as a first combination of a first slot 666 in the back piece 616 and a first hook and loop tab 668 cooperatively engaging the first strap 617 and a second combination of a second slot 667 in the back piece 616 and a second hook and loop tab 669 cooperatively engaging the second strap 618.
The first and second straps 617 and 618 are preferably made of an elastic material, similar to the straps of the fourth embodiment of the invention 500. Given the elasticity of the first and second straps 617 and 618, another embodiment could simply rely on the elasticity of the straps 617 and 618 for adjustment, and dispense with the connecting length adjustment means. However, such an embodiment would likely accommodate a smaller range of head 100 sizes.
In the end, the retention system shown in
A chinstrap (not shown) could optionally be used with the various embodiments of the headband 200, 300, 400, 500 and 600, especially as a secondary retention means, without significantly compromising their function.
The present invention should not be considered limited to the particular examples described above, but rather should be understood to cover all aspects of the invention as fairly set out in the claims arising from this application. For example, while suitable sizes, materials, fasteners, and the like have been disclosed in the above discussion, it should be appreciated that these are provided by way of example and not of limitation as a number of other sizes, materials, fasteners, and so forth may be used without departing from the invention. Various modifications as well as numerous structures to which the present invention may be applicable will be readily apparent to those of skill in the art to which the present invention is directed upon review of the present specifications. The claims which arise from this application are intended to cover such modifications and structures.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/459,487, filed Apr. 2, 2003.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60459487 | Apr 2003 | US |