RETINOIC ACID PRECURSOR AND ANTICANCER DRUG COMPOSITION COMPRISING SAME

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20240261309
  • Publication Number
    20240261309
  • Date Filed
    July 20, 2022
    2 years ago
  • Date Published
    August 08, 2024
    6 months ago
  • Inventors
  • Original Assignees
    • INDUSTRIAL COOPERATION FOUNDATION JEONBUK NATIONAL UNIVERSITY
Abstract
A retinoic acid prodrug to which a boron functional group having a structure represented by chemical formula 1 is bound is described. The retinoic acid prodrug self-assembles to form nanoparticles. Therefore, an anticancer drug composition comprises the same as an active ingredient. According to the retinoic acid prodrug, targeted therapy of tumor cells is possible through the synergistic anticancer effect of retinoic acid and the boron functional group and the surface modification of particles. In particular, the retinoic acid prodrug enables a drug loading of 100 wt %, and thus can provide an effective anticancer drug.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to a retinoic acid prodrug and an anticancer drug composition comprising the same, and presents a model for effectively utilizing the anticancer effect of retinoic acid.


BACKGROUND ART

Retinoic acid (RA) is a type of active metabolite of vitamin A, plays an important role in cell growth and differentiation, and is used in the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia. In addition, as it has been reported that retinoic acid exhibits an anticancer effect that kills cancer cells along with an antioxidant effect, interest in its application is increasing.


However, retinoic acid has a significantly lower anticancer effect compared to existing anticancer drugs, and this limits its use as an independent treatment drug, and it causes toxicity to normal cells upon its administration in high doses. In addition, due to its low solubility and absence of capability to target tumors, the development of an effective drug delivery technology is required to develop it as an anticancer treatment drug.


Cancer cells produce a large amount of reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), which act as a messenger in cell signaling pathways and also induce tumor growth (Noh, J. et. al., Amplification of oxidative stress by a dual stimuli-responsive hybrid drug enhances cancer cell death. Nature Communications 2015, 6, 6907. et al.; and 1). An excessive amount of ROS causes oxidative damage to cancer cells, and even kill cells. Therefore, cancer cells are equipped with a powerful antioxidant defense system to offset the harmful effects of ROS. In particular, glutathione (GSH), which is the most abundant antioxidant in cells, acts as a scavenger of oxygen free radicals and detoxifies xenobiotics (Yoo, D. et. al., Glutathione-Depleting Pro-Oxidant as a Selective Anticancer Therapeutic Agent. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 10070-10077). Many studies have shown that an excess amount of GSH promotes tumor growth and gives cancer cells resistance to treatment. Therefore, depletion of intracellular GSH weakens the antioxidant capacity of cancer cells, thereby making them vulnerable to chemotherapeutic agents.


Boronic acid and boronate linking groups specifically combine with hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) to form a quinone methide (QM) intermediate, and QM exhibits an anticancer effect by removing GSH, thereby amplifying intracellular oxidative stress and killing cancer cells. In addition, QM reacts with nucleophilic water to generate hydroxybenzyl alcohol (HBA), which exhibits an anticancer effect by preventing the migration or invasion of cancer cells and inhibiting the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in cancer cells.


In the last two decades, numerous nanocarriers have been developed as drug carriers, and they have been used to deliver hydrophobic anticancer drugs to tumor cells. However, drug carrier-mediated drug delivery has disadvantages such as low drug loading capacity, early drug release, and complexity of scale-up. In addition, most drug carriers act as excipients or do not play any therapeutic role, and they may induce toxicity and immunogenicity during degradation and metabolism.


Self-assembling prodrug based drug self-delivery is drawing attention as a new paradigm in the field of controlled drug delivery for highly efficient anticancer treatment. In drug self-delivery, the drug has a nanometer size and achieves intracellular delivery on its own without a carrier mixed with an additional excipient.


Self-assembly is the formation of nanostructures by effective self-assembly of small molecules through various nano-covalent interactions such as hydrophobic interactions, van der Waals interactions, and pi-pi stacking.


A prodrug is defined as a bioreversible inactive compound that is converted to an active drug upon administration to exhibit its therapeutic activity without toxic side effects.


Self-assembling prodrug based drug self-delivery is a combination of a prodrug and molecular self-assembly and has been realized by accurately controlling the molecular structure of a prodrug. A key design feature of self-assembling prodrugs is amphiphilic balance. They have both hydrophobic and hydrophilic regions and thus can spontaneously assemble in an aqueous environment. As a result, prodrug self-assembly can protect a drug from rapid exhaustion and inhibit early release of the drug. In addition, self-assembling prodrugs play a unique role in terms of high drug loading efficiency of 100% and simple manufacturing process.


An example of a self-assembling prodrug for drug self-delivery is a prodrug amphiphile that binds hydrophilic irinotecan to hydrophobic chlorambucil to form a nanostructure through self-assembly, which realized drug self-delivery without any carrier (Huang, P. et. al., Combination of Small Molecule Prodrug and Nanodrug Delivery: Amphiphilic Drug-Drug Conjugate for Cancer Therapy. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2014, 136, 11748-11756.).


The inventors of the present application made efforts to develop an effective composition for anticancer treatment using retinoic acid and boronic acid or boronate linking groups, and thereby accomplished the present invention.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Technical Problem

An object of the present invention is to provide a means to effectively use retinoic acid in anticancer treatment, wherein retinoic acid has limitations in its application to anticancer treatment, and in particular, to provide a means to target and treat tumor cells.


In addition, another object of the present invention is to provide a means for utilizing an anticancer effect of boronic acid or boronate linking groups.


Technical Solution

The present invention provides a boronate retinoic acid prodrug (RABA) to which a boron functional group is bonded, having the structure represented by Formula 1 below:




embedded image


The retinoic acid prodrug may form nanoparticles through self-assembly.


The nanoparticles are formed by nano-precipitating RABA in a solvent.


The nanoparticles may be composed of 100% by weight of RABA.


The surface of the nanoparticles may be coated with γ-polyglutamic acid (γPGA).


The nanoparticles may target cancer cells in which gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT) is overexpressed.


The retinoic acid prodrug produces quinone methide (QM) in the presence of H2O2.


The retinoic acid prodrug produces hydroxybenzyl alcohol (HBA) in the presence of H2O2.


The retinoic acid prodrug depletes H2O2 and glutathione (GSH).


The retinoic acid prodrug inhibits tumor growth.


The present invention provides an anticancer composition including the retinoic acid prodrug as an active ingredient.


Advantageous Effects

According to the present invention, retinoic acid can be effectively used for anticancer treatment. In other words, an anticancer effect may be improved by the synergistic effect of retinoic acid and boron functional groups, and tumor cells may be targeted and treated through surface modification. In particular, since 100% by weight of the nanoparticles of the present invention can be prepared to be composed of a drug having an anticancer effect, there are advantages that the anticancer effect can be maximized, and tumors can be targeted without a separate drug delivery system.





DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 shows an anticancer action mechanism of RABA nanoparticles of the present invention.



FIG. 2 a preparation and decomposition process of RABA nanoparticles of the present invention.



FIG. 3A shows 1H NMR data of RABA prepared in an embodiment.



FIG. 3B shows the results of mass spectrometer measurement of RABA.



FIG. 4 shows 1H NMR data after incubation of RABA in an H2O2 solution.



FIG. 5A shows a size distribution of RABA nanoparticles.



FIG. 5B shows a SEM photograph of RABA nanoparticles.



FIG. 5B shows a SEM photograph taken after self-assembly reaction of RA and Compound 2.



FIG. 6A shows zeta potential of RABA, RABA+dopamine, and tRABA at pH 7.



FIG. 6B shows a SEM photograph of tRABA.



FIG. 6C shows a size distribution of tRABA.



FIG. 6D shows size change of tRABA when stored in PBS including water and fetal bovine serum (10 wt %).



FIG. 6E is a size distribution of tRABA after incubation in PBS including H2O2 (1 mM).



FIG. 6F compares H2O2 depletion by RA, HBA, RA+HBA, and tRABA.



FIG. 7A shows a fluorescence image obtained 1 hour after adding tRABA nanoparticles loaded with fluorescent Nile Red to GGT immobilized on a 96-well microplate.



FIG. 7B shows a fluorescence image obtained after incubating tRABA nanoparticles loaded with fluorescent Nile Red in SW620 cells.



FIG. 7C shows a fluorescence image of multicellular spheroids obtained after incubating with fluorescent tRABA nanoparticles and fluorescent RABA nanoparticles for 6 hours and 24 hours, respectively.



FIG. 8A shows comparison of intracellular GSH levels in A549 cells treated with RA, HBA, RA+HBA, and tRABA.



FIG. 8B shows comparison of ROS levels in cancer cells treated with RA, HBA, RA+HBA, and tRABA.



FIG. 8C shows comparison of cell survival rates 24 hours after treating A549 cells with RA, HBA, and tRABA.



FIG. 8D shows comparison of cell survival rates 24 hours after treating SW620 cells with RA, HBA, and tRABA.



FIG. 8E shows comparison of apoptosis inducing ability of RA, HBA, RA+HBA, and tRABA.



FIG. 8F shows the results of confocal laser scanning microscopy using mitochondrial membrane potential probe JC-1 die for RA, HBA, RA+HBA, and tRABA.



FIG. 8G shows the results of an analysis of CRT expression levels in cells treated with RA, HBA, RA+HBA, and tRABA.



FIG. 8H shows comparison of levels of HMGB1 released from A549 cells treated with RA, HBA, and tRABA.



FIG. 9A shows fluorescence images in a tumor model mouse after injecting tRABA nanoparticles loaded with fluorescent IR820.



FIG. 9B shows comparison of tumor growth inhibition efficacy of RA, HBA, RA+HBA, and tRABA and body weight change according to treatment with the same.



FIG. 9C shows the results of a CRT expression analysis of cancer cells according to treatment with RA, HBA, RA+HBA, RABA, and tRABA.



FIG. 9D shows the results of a TNF-α expression analysis of cancer cells according to treatment with RA, HBA, RA+HBA, RABA, and tRABA.



FIG. 9E shows the results of a VEGF expression analysis of cancer cells according to treatment with RA+HBA, RABA, and tRABA.



FIG. 9F shows ALT level in serum after tRABA injection and an H&E staining photograph of removed organs after tRABA injection.





BEST MODE

The present invention provides a boronate retinoic acid prodrug (RABA) to which a boron functional group is bonded, having the structure shown in Formula 1 below:




embedded image


The RABA is in a form in which a boron functional group is bound to a terminal of retinoic acid.


Since the boron functional group in RABA is slightly polar and hydrophilic, RABA becomes amphipathic by the bonding of the boron functional group. Amphipathic RABA undergoes self-assembly in an aqueous solution to form nanoparticles. Moreover, RABA has structural flexibility. Therefore, RABA undergoes self-assembly in an antisolvent, typically in water, to form stable colloidal nanoparticles. Therefore, the present invention provides nanoparticles formed by self-assembly of RABA.


The nanoparticles have both the efficacy of ‘anticancer’ and the efficacy of ‘tumor targeting.’ Therefore, the present invention provides the nanoparticles as ‘tumor-targeting anti-cancer nanoparticles.’


First, the efficacy of ‘anticancer’ is explained from the anticancer action mechanism shown in FIG. 1. In other words, when the boron functional group in the nanoparticle reacts with hydrogen peroxide, which exists at a high concentration in cancer cells, a quinone methide (QM) intermediate is formed, and at the same time, retinoic acid (RA) is released. The QM exhibits an anticancer effect that kills cancer cells by amplifying intracellular oxidative stress by removing cellular antioxidant glutathione (GSH). In addition, the released RA induces cancer cell death, that is, apoptosis, thereby causing cancer cell death. Therefore, RABA of the present invention exhibits excellent anticancer efficacy from the synergistic effect of QM, which depletes GSH, and RA, which induces apoptosis. Furthermore, QM reacts with nucleophilic water to produce hydroxybenzyl alcohol (HBA). In other words, QM competitively reacts with GSH and water to produce HBA. The HAB produced at this time inhibits angiogenesis by inhibiting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which promotes angiogenesis, thereby brining an effect of inhibiting cancer metastasis.


RABA forms nanoparticles in the manner of self-assembly in an aqueous solution due to its amphiphilic nature, so the preparation method for the RABA nanoparticles of the present invention is very simple. In addition, there is no need to add separate ingredients such as excipients in forming nanoparticles from RABA. Therefore, the nanoparticles produced at this time may be composed of 100% by weight of RABA. This means that a drug can be prepared to have a content of 100% by weight without the need to add other ingredients such as excipients in the particles. Therefore, the nanoparticles of the present invention can maximize pharmacological effects. In other words, a maximum effect can be exhibited with a minimal use.


Next, for the efficacy of ‘tumor targeting,’ the present invention provides the nanoparticles in a surface-modified state by coating the nanoparticle surface with γ-polyglutamic acid (γPGA). Therefore, the surface of the nanoparticles of the present invention preferably has a form coated with γPGA. γPGA can bind to gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT), which is overexpressed in the surface membrane of various tumor cells, and nanoparticles that are surface-modified with γPGA specifically target GGT-overexpressed cancer cells. Then, as described above, when RA and QM are released by the triggering by H2O2, an anticancer effect is exhibited.


In the present invention, dopamine is first used as an anchor for the nanoparticle surface modification. Dopamine has a positive charge and a strong binding ability of catechol. Dopamine is adsorbed to the RABA nanoparticle surface as a complex is formed between the catechol and amine groups of dopamine and boronic acid. Then, γPGA is adsorbed to the dopamine-adsorbed surface of RABA due to electrostatic attraction between a carboxylate and an amine.



FIG. 2 briefly shows the process of preparing and decomposing the nanoparticles of the present invention. First, nanoparticles are prepared through self-assembly of RABA, and at this time, γ-polyglutamic acid is added to coat the surface of the formed nanoparticles. ‘tRABA’ prepared in this manner is decomposed in the presence of hydrogen peroxide and water to exhibit anticancer activity through the mechanism shown in FIG. 1.


The present invention provides an anticancer drug composition including the nanoparticles as an active ingredient. The composition may include additional drugs, adjuvants, or excipients for anticancer effects in addition to the nanoparticles of the present invention.


Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in more detail through examples. However, the present invention should not be considered limited thereto.


MODES OF INVENTION
Examples
1. Preparation of RABA

RABA was prepared in the following order.




embedded image


First, Compound 1 was synthesized through a reaction of RA and carbonyldiimidazole, and Compound 1 was subject to a reaction with 4-(hydroxymethyl)phenylboronic acid pinacol ester to prepare Compound 2. Next, a cyclic boronate ester of Compound 2 was removed to obtain RABA.



FIG. 3A shows the 1H NMR data of the prepared RABA. The 5.1 ppm peak corresponds to methylene between an ester and a benzene ring. In addition, FIG. 3B shows the results of mass spectrometer measurement of the molecular weight of the RABA. The molecular weight of RABA was measured to be 435.20 m/z[M].


2. Evaluation of Reactivity of RABA in the Presence of H2O2


To evaluate the reactivity of the prepared RABA in the presence of H2O2, 1H NMR of the RABA was taken after incubation in a 5 mM H2O2 solution. The results are shown in FIG. 4.


According to the results, a shift of the peak due to the release of HBA was observed in the H2O2-treated RABA. The peaks at 7.3 and 7.8 ppm corresponding to aromatic protons disappeared, and new peaks at 6.8 and 7.1 ppm appeared. The peaks corresponding to benzylic proton were shifted from 5.1 ppm to 5.0 ppm. On the other hand, there was no peak shift in the RABA incubated in water without H2O2. These results show that RABA exists in a stable form in water but may release QM in the presence of H2O2.


3. Self-Assembly of RABA

RABA dissolved in tetrahydrofuran (TIF) was added to water while stirring. During dilution in water, strong light scattering occurred due to the Tyndall phenomenon. This showed that the nanoparticles were being formed well. The results of measuring the size of the formed nanoparticles are shown in FIG. 5A. The mean hydrodynamic diameter was measured to be ˜120 nm.


In addition, FIG. 5B shows a SEM photograph of the self-assembled RABA nanoparticles. It was confirmed that the nanoparticles existed in a spherical colloidal state. In addition, an experiment was performed to confirm self-assembly of Compound 2, which is produced during the preparation process of RA and RABA. The results are shown in FIG. 5C. According the results, it was confirmed that RA and Compound 2 failed to undergo self-assembly and large precipitates of an irregular shape were formed instead.


In other words, it can be seen that only RABA, which is amphipathic and structurally flexible, may form nanoparticles with a stable structure and shape through self-assembly.


4. Preparation of γPGA-Coated RABA (tRABA)


After dopamine was adsorbed on RABA, TPGA was adsorbed on the surface of RABA on which dopamine was adsorbed. First, water in which RABA nanoparticles were dispersed and an dopamine aqueous solution were mixed, the resulting mixture was stirred for 1 hour, and nanoparticles on which dopamine was adsorbed were separated through centrifugation. Next, the nanoparticles on which dopamine was adsorbed were dispersed in water and mixed with a γPGA aqueous solution, and the resulting mixture was stirred for 1 hour. Then, TPGA-coated RABA nanoparticles were separated through centrifugation.


The zeta potential of the prepared tRABA at pH 7 was measured. The results are shown in FIG. 6A. The negative charge of tRABA is thought to be due to the numerous carboxylate groups of PGA.



FIGS. 6B and 6C show the SEM images of tRABA and the results of particle size measurement. tRABA maintained its spherical colloidal state as in RABA, and the mean hydrodynamic diameter was measured to be −160 nm, confirming that the particle size had slightly increased as tRABA became tRABA.


Next, tRABA was added to PBS including fetal bovine serum (10 wt %) and incubated for 7 days to observe the particle size. The results are shown in FIG. 6D. According to the results, it can be seen that the tRBAB maintains excellent colloidal stability in a physiological solution. On the other hand, according to FIG. 6E, which shows the result of incubating in PBS including H2O2 (1 mM) for 5 hours, the tRABA lost its structural binding and showed a significant change in the particle size and the size distribution. In other words, it was confirmed that tRABA is decomposed in the presence of H2O2 as shown in FIG. 2.


Next, H2O2 depletion by tRABA was evaluated. This is because tRABA, like RABA, is predicted to deplete H2O2 through deboronation of aryl boronic acid in the presence of H2O2. H2O2 depletion was evaluated by comparing RA, HBA, and RA+HBA. RA (65 mg/mL), HBA (28 mg/mL), RA (65 mg/mL)+HBA (28 mg/mL), and tRABA (100 mg/mL) were each added to 1 mL of 100 mM H2O2 aqueous solution and stir for 1 hour. After mixing a tetrahydrofuran solution in which diphenine peroxalate and rubulin were dissolved with the H2O2 solution, the concentration of hydrogen peroxide was quantified by a chemimulinescence principle (peroxalate chemimulinescence) using a luminometer (FB12 Berthold Detection System) (Jung et al. Molecularly engineered theranostic nanoparticles for thrombosed vessels: H2O2-activatable contrast-enhanced photoacoustic imaging and antithrombotic therapy, ACS Nano, 2018, 12(1), 392). The results are shown in FIG. 6F. According to the results, it can be confirmed that in the case of tRABA, the amount of H2O2 was significantly reduced. From this, it could be seen that tRABA also reacts by depleting H2O2.


5. Evaluation of Cellular Uptake and Tumor Penetration of tRABA Nanoparticles


The fluorescence image shown FIG. 7A was obtained 1 hour after adding tRABA nanoparticles loaded with fluorescent Nile Red to GGT immobilized on a 96-well microplate. The nanoparticles treated with tRABA showed higher fluorescence intensity compared to RABA. This shows that tRABA binds to GGT much better than RABA. On the other hand, when tRABA was added after pretreatment with γPGA, the binding of tRABA to GGT was disrupted by γPGA, and so fluorescence did not appear. This ultimately shows that the binding of tRABA to GGT is achieved by γPGA on the surface.


Next, to evaluate cellular uptake and internalization of tRABA, fluorescence images were obtained after incubating SW620 cells with Nile Red-loaded tRABA nanoparticles for 1 hour and 24 hours. The results are shown in FIG. 7B. According to the results, it can be seen that over time, red fluorescence spread widely in the cytoplasm and thus the signal intensity increased. Cells treated with tRABA exhibited much higher fluorescence intensity than those treated with RABA. This shows that tRABA entered into the cells faster than RABA by GGT-dependent endocytosis.


Next, SW620 multicellular spheroids were used to evaluate the tumor penetration of Nile Red-loaded tRABA nanoparticles. FIG. 7C shows fluorescence images of multicellular spheroids obtained after incubating with fluorescent tRABA nanoparticles and fluorescent RABA nanoparticles for 6 hours and 24 hours, respectively. According to the results, weak fluorescence appeared from both spheroids after 6 hours. However, after 24 hours, tRABA-treated spheroids showed much higher fluorescence intensity than RABA-treated spheroids. This means that tRABA penetrated much deeper into the spheroids than RABA. From this, it could be confirmed that tRABA has excellent tumor penetration.


6. Evaluation of Anticancer Activity of tRABA


tRABA releases QM, which depletes GSH in the presence of H2O2, and QM competitively reacts with GSH and water to produce HBA. Therefore, an experiment was conducted to measure intracellular GSH levels in A549 cells treated with tRABA. The results are shown in FIG. 8A. According to the results, cells treated with RA (210 mM) and HBA (210 mM) alone or together had no effect on the GSH levels. On the other hand, in the cells treated with tRABA, a change in the GSH levels was observed in a concentration-dependent manner. This is because the arylboronic acid moiety of tRABA was decomposed to generate QM, which combined with GSH, thereby depleting the intracellular GSH.


Next, to evaluate the effect of tRABA on the level of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in cancer cells, an experiment was performed by using DCFH-DA as a probe for ROS. The results are shown in FIG. 8B. According to the results, it can be seen that RA induced the production of ROS in the cells to some extent and tRABA also induced the production of ROS in a concentration-dependent manner. In particular, 100 mg/mL of tRABA induced significantly more ROS production compared to the equivalent level of RA (210 mM). This suggests that even when all QM produced from the deboronization at tRABA, which is triggered by H2O2, fail to react with GSH due to competitive reaction with the nucleophilic water, there is a cooperative production of ROS by QM, which depletes RA and GSH.


Next, to evaluate the cytotoxicity of tRABA, a 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT)) analysis was performed. The cell survival rate was measured 24 hours after A549 cells were treated with RA, HBA, and tRABA, and the results are shown in FIG. 8C. In the cells treated with RA (210 mM), the cell survival rate decreased due to the apoptosis-inducing ability of RA. The HBA (220 mM)-treated cells exhibited negligible cytotoxicity. As anticipated from the cooperative production of ROS in the previous experiment, the cells treated with 100 mg/mL tRABA showed very high cytotoxicity compared to the equivalent combination of RA (210 mM) and HBA (220 mM).


Next, cytotoxicity on SW620 cells was tested, and the results are shown in FIG. 8D. From the results, it could be seen that tRABA has a synergistic anticancer effect by releasing RA, which produces ROS, and QM, which depletes GSH.


Next, to evaluate the ability of tRABA to induce apoptosis, a flow cytometric analysis was performed using Annexin V-FITC as an apoptosis marker and propidium iodide as a cell viability marker. Apoptotic cells induced by RA are represented by the increased distribution in the upper right quadrant of FIG. 8E. From this, it could be confirmed that tRABA induces concentration-dependent apoptosis much more effectively than the equivalent levels of RA and HBA.


Next, since it is known that mitochondria play an important role in activating apoptosis and that one of the conserved aspects of apoptosis is mitochondrial collapse, confocal laser scanning microscopy was performed using JC-1 die as a mitochondrial membrane potential probe. The results are shown in FIG. 8F. From the increased green/red fluorescence intensity ratio, it can be seen that tRABA caused a significant decrease in the membrane potential. From this, it can be seen that tRABA caused more mitochondrial damage compared to the equivalent levels of RA and HBA, indicating that GSH depletion enables the anticancer activity of RA that induces apoptosis.


Next, since immunogenic apoptosis enhances immunogenicity and anticancer effects by releasing damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) substances during the cell dying process, an experiment was performed to confirm whether tRABA nanoparticles induce immunogenic cell death to improve immunogenicity. First, the expression levels of DAMPs such as calreticulin (CRT) and high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) were confirmed as endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress markers. Since it is known that CRT is present in the perinuclear endoplasmic reticulum but moves to the cell membrane during early apoptotic stages, and CRT on the cell membrane promotes phagocytosis by dendritic cells and induce immunogenicity, a flow cytometric analysis was performed to confirm the CRT level in A549 cells after tRABA treatment. As shown in FIG. 8G, it was confirmed that RA and HBA had almost no effect, while tRABA nanoparticles significantly increased the level of CRT.


Next, since it is known that HMGB-1 is a nuclear protein that binds to DNA and is triggered by an apoptosis inducer and that in the late stage of apoptosis, cells are destroyed and HMGB-1 is released into the tumor microenvironment to induce dendritic cell maturation and antigen presentation, an experiment was performed to confirm the effect of tRABA nanoparticles on HMGB-1 release. As shown in FIG. 8H, it was confirmed that HBA did not affect the level of HMGB-1, while RA significantly increased the level of HMGB-1, and that tRABA nanoparticles increased the level of HMGB-1 in a concentration-dependent manner. Through this, it could be seen that tRABA nanoparticles increase ER stress to release CRT and HMGB-1 and induce immunogenic cancer cell death.


7. Therapeutic Effect of tRABA on Tumor Animal Models


An experiment was performed to confirm whether tRABA nanoparticles may accumulate in a tumor by binding to GGT overexpressed particularly in cancer cells. FIG. 9A shows fluorescence images taken in a tumor model mouse (a mouse including a tumor) after intravenous injection of tRABA nanoparticles loaded with fluorescent IR820. The tumor exhibited a strong fluorescence signal 24 hours after injecting the tRABA nanoparticles. This shows that the tRABA nanoparticles target tumors by binding to GGT expressed on cancer cells.


Next, the anticancer effect was evaluated by administering a therapeutic drug in the tumor model mice when the tumor size reached 50 mm3. A therapeutic drug was intravenously administered on Days 1, 4, 7, 10, and 13 to the tumor model mice. The results are shown in FIG. 9B. According to the results, RA (3 mg/kg), HBA (1.5 mg/kg), and their combination had a negligible inhibitory effect on tumor growth. On the other hand, tRABA (5 mg/kg) almost perfectly inhibited tumor growth without any change in the body weight during the 4-week observation period.


Next, since it is known that TNF-α is released during immunogenic apoptosis and promotes immune responses to exhibit antitumor activity, an experiment for evaluating the CRT and TNF-α levels was performed to confirm whether tRABA nanoparticles induce immunogenic apoptosis in a tumor. As a result, it was confirmed that CRT expression was significantly increased by treatment with tRABA nanoparticles compared to RABA and RA+HBA (FIG. 9c), and TNF-α expression was significantly improved (FIG. 9D). In addition, the immunostaining images show that tRABA nanoparticles significantly induce CRT and TNF-α expression in tumors.


Next, tumor tissues were examined to evaluate the effect of tRABA nanoparticles on VEGF expression. As shown in FIG. 9E, it was confirmed that the untreated tumors showed high VEGF expression, while RA+BHA inhibited VEGF expression, and the tRABA nanoparticles significantly inhibited VEGF expression.


Next, to evaluate the safety of tRABA nanoparticles, tRABA was injected into normal mice once every 3 days for 2 weeks. As shown in FIG. 9F, no abnormal change was observed in the level of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) in the serum after tRABA injection, and even in the results of H&E staining of each extracted organ for histological toxicity analysis, no abnormal findings were observed compared to the untreated group. In addition, there was no particular change in the body weight during the two-week observation period. From these results, the safety of tRABA and the expectation to the transfer to clinical practice were confirmed.


INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY

The present invention relates to a retinoic acid prodrug and an anticancer drug composition including the same. According to the present invention, retinoic acid can be effectively used for anticancer treatment, the anticancer effect can be maximized, and tumor targeting is possible without a separate drug delivery system.

Claims
  • 1. A retinoic acid prodrug (RABA) to which a boron functional group is bonded, having the structure represented by Formula 1 below:
  • 2. The retinoic acid prodrug according to claim 1, wherein the retinoic acid prodrug forms nanoparticles through self-assembly.
  • 3. The retinoic acid prodrug according to claim 2, wherein the nanoparticles are formed by nano-precipitating RABA in a solvent.
  • 4. The retinoic acid prodrug according to claim 2, wherein the nanoparticles are composed of 100% by weight of RABA.
  • 5. The retinoic acid prodrug according to claim 2, wherein the surface of the nanoparticles are coated with γ-polyglutamic acid (γPGA).
  • 6. The retinoic acid prodrug according to claim 5, wherein the nanoparticles target cancer cells in which gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT) is overexpressed.
  • 7. The retinoic acid prodrug according to claim 1, wherein the retinoic acid prodrug produces quinone methide (QM) in the presence of H2O2.
  • 8. The retinoic acid prodrug according to claim 1, wherein the retinoic acid prodrug produces hydroxybenzyl alcohol (HBA) in the presence of H2O2.
  • 9. The retinoic acid prodrug according to claim 1, wherein the retinoic acid prodrug depletes H2O2 and glutathione (GSH).
  • 10. The retinoic acid prodrug according to claim 1, wherein the retinoic acid prodrug inhibits tumor growth.
  • 11. An anticancer composition comprising the retinoic acid prodrug according to claim 1 as an active ingredient.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
10-2021-0095512 Jul 2021 KR national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/KR2022/010593 7/20/2022 WO