The present invention relates generally to large, removable, heavy duty doors having roll-type closure systems. In particular, the present invention is directed to structures and techniques for maintaining alignment of such doors under a wide variety of conditions, and avoiding many problems currently associated with such doors.
Large door structures are well-known for aircraft hangers, mines, large vehicle enclosures, stock pile enclosures, animal shelters, industrial enclosures, and other large-scale industrial applications. One conventional approach to large doors or closures has been the use of a flexible curtain for closing the doorway or opening, and a curtain winding mechanism for lower and raising the curtain door. Such closures or doors are very advantageous in that the flexible material of the door allows catastrophic damage to be avoiding under conditions of impact (from collisions), high winds, earth quakes, and the like.
One advantage of doors or closures formed by flexible material such as rubber, is that they are relatively light. As a result, they can be raised, lowered or otherwise transported with relatively simple mechanical means, through the use of low-power motivating mechanisms. In many applications, a simple spring-loaded counter-balanced, wind-up drum is sufficient to provide both the retrieval and deployment functions for this type of closure system. Because the closure material is stored on the drum, very little additional space is necessary in comparison with rigid doors or closure structures which must be accommodated with extra storage space when the closure is stored when not deployed.
Various examples of flexible or curtain door applications, arrangements and techniques are disclosed in a number of U.S. patents, such as: U.S. Pat. No. 4,478,268 to Palmer; U.S. Pat. No. 3,430,677 to Pierce; and, U.S. Pat. No. 4,601,320 to Taylor. All of these are incorporated by reference as examples of the conventional technology.
One major advantage found with these arrangements is that catastrophic damage can be minimized due to the flexibility of the closure material. In some cases, the flexible curtain can be withdrawn (onto its roll drum) even under pressure differentials, which tend to force the rubber curtain closure against its frame. This type of door is especially useful in withstanding high winds, precipitation and the like.
Further, depending upon the arrangement, even after a catastrophic event, the flexible, curtain door can be reinstalled onto its drum and into its tracks (defined by the door frame and retaining piece), so as to resume functionality. Depending upon the size of the door and the configuration of the tracks in which the door rides, this can be a fairly simple operation, or it can be a very complex and time-consuming operation.
Catastrophic events are not the only difficulties facing this type of flexible closure system. Depending upon the weight of the flexible overhead closure, wind conditions, and the capabilities of the mechanical reeling system, misalignment of the flexible curtain can occur. This most often happens due to extensive flexing, “walking”, shifting, bunching, buckling (hour glass effect), and the like. Such curtain distortion or shifting can occur either during deployment, or when rewinding. Any number of mechanical and environmental factors can lead to the shifting of the flexible curtain that will often result in wear and other degradation.
Also, substantial rewinding and deployment can degrade the material of the flexible curtain, especially if misalignment occurs due to “walking”, shifting wind pressure, or the like. If a heavy deployment and rewind cycle is employed, the fabric can substantially deteriorate, reducing the life and effectiveness of the flexible closure. Replacement, especially of a large high-grade rubber curtain, can be quite expensive.
While catastrophic events are relatively rare, deterioration due to normal use, and exacerbated deterioration due to even slight misalignment during that use remain major problems that cannot be avoided by the most stringent safety measures. Accordingly, the art of flexible overhead closures admits to a great deal of improvement, especially with respect to protecting the material of the flexible closure/door from deterioration due to normal use, and from misalignment.
It is a primary goal of the present invention to minimize or eliminate flexible overhead closure/door deterioration caused by misalignment, normal deployment, or mischance.
It is another object of the present invention to prevent shifting of a flexible overhead door in the deployed position.
It is a further object of the present invention to prevent bunching, buckling or “hour glassing” of a flexible overhead door during retrieval or deployment.
It is an additional object of the present invention to configure and operate an overhead flexible door in a manner to decrease wear and strain on specific parts of the door, such as lubricating strips and reinforcing areas.
It is yet a further object of the present invention to provide techniques for minimizing total wear on a flexible overhead door.
It is again an additional object of the present invention to provide a technique to better facilitate easy handling of an overhead flexible door.
It is yet a further object of the present invention to provide a structure to better lubricate wear-exposed portions of a flexible overhead door.
It is again a further object of the present invention to provide a technique to maintain flexible overhead door in proper alignment throughout a full range of opening and closing cycles.
These and other goals and objects of the present invention are achieved by a flexible, retractable door system including a flexible door and a fixed door frame. The door has a front surface and a rear surface with a windlock structure. The frame has a retainer extending over the windlock. The system also has a rubber guidestrip running along at least one length of the flexible door in a position so that an end of the curtain retainer is positioned between the guidestrip and the windlock.
The system of the present invention, as depicted in the drawings includes a series of inventive structures that working together, and to a lesser extent individually maintain the alignment of a flexible, retractable overhead closure/door in its track system. Such maintenance of alignment is crucial since flexible overhead doors tend to become misaligned, either as part of the deployment/retrieval operation, or as a result of environmental conditions. Misalignment most commonly leads to increased wear on the door material and its bearing/lubricating elements, and ultimately to the failure of both the function of the door and its overall structure.
The structure of the conventional flexible overhead door 1, as depicted in the conventional portion of
The door is open and closed by a drum reel (partially depicted in
The present invention operates as part of a flexible, overhead closure or door 1 within a framed opening which must be covered or contained by a closure. It is necessary that the opening be framed with some sort of structure in order to receive the closure, and to mount the storage drum and motivating system, as well as providing support for the bulk of the door. The frame work around the opening should accommodate a channel structure to hold at least a portion of flexible door 1. As depicted in
Preferably, the flexible door 1 is constructed of a two ply, nominal ¼ inch-thick rubber sheet. Preferably, the sheet will have a tensile strength of 160 lb./2000 lb. per square inch rating, and will be of R.M.A. grade II. The temperature ranges for normal flexibility are preferably from −10° F. through 220° F. The wind locks 11 are preferably made of ½ inch R.M.A. grade II material. The rubber wind locks 11 are preferably bonded to rubber door 1 in any one of a number of conventional techniques.
The guide structure, including frame bracket 2 and curtain retainer 3 are constructed together so as to form a channel 4 to contain wind lock 11, in the deployed position, and as the rubber door 1 is deployed or retrieved on its storage drum (
The guide created by channel 4, retainer 3, and frame 2 will be loose enough to allow free movement of door 1 is sufficiently tight to create sufficient tension so that the door will be able to operate in wind pressures up to 20 lbs. per square foot (generally equivalent to a wind speed of 88 miles per hour) without disengaging from the channels 4. This arrangement will also allow the wind lock to disengage from the channel or guide system in pressures greater than 20 lbs. per square foot (thereby avoiding tearing of the door material under extreme stress). The curtain retainer 3 can be attached to the rest of the frame 2 in such a way that it is easily removable so that door 1 can be reattached if wind lock 11 has been forced loose from channel 4.
The curtain retainer 3 has an angled extension 31, which extends relatively close to curtain door 1. This angled extension is arranged substantially parallel to a beveled surface 111 of wind lock 11. This allows a tighter fit within guide channel 4 for the wind lock 11. This angled extension and matching surface 111 on wind lock 11 provide increased holding capability so that curtain door 1 is not as easily torn loose or otherwise dislocated under environment stress or collision.
Because there will be high pressure contact between pieces such as wind lock beveled surface 111 and different parts of curtain retainer 3, a lubricating and wear agency is necessary. Consequently, surfaces 112 and 111 of wind lock 11 are covered with a nylon fabric, and attached thereto by conventional techniques. The fabric currently in use is DuPont catalog number 728. However, despite these expediences, misalignment and ultimately dislocation frequently occur with conventional door systems of this type.
In order to prevent misalignment and resulting dislocation in conventional systems, an additional expedient is needed to help keep the wind lock 11. in channel 4, under all circumstances. A first embodiment of the present invention addresses potential misalignment due to “walking”, horizontal shifting, buckling, or sagging (due to gravity and material deterioration) of curtain closure/door 1. This is accomplished by a rubber guide strip 12. This guide strip is located approximately 1¼ inches from the edge of beveled surface 111 of wind lock 11. This arrangement prevents “walking” or other types of shifting that can force the wind lock 11 from channel 4. Side surface 121 of guide strip 12 is provided with the nylon fabric lubricating medium as is done with the surfaces 111, 112 of wind lock 11. This allows interface with retainer 3 without the danger of binding between retainer 3 and guide strip 12. The nylon fabric also limits material deterioration of guide strip 12 and wind lock 11.
The width of wind lock 11 is depicted as being 2½ inches, including approximately ½ inch of beveled surface. Since wind lock 11 extends the entirety of the length of door 1, there is a substantial decrease in the flexibility of the overall door structure. This condition is also exacerbated by the addition of two rubber guide strips 12 on each door 1. The lack of flexibility is enhanced by the nylon lubricating fabric which covers the back surfaces 112 of each of the wind locks 11. The nylon fabric runs the entire length of the wind locks and is bonded thereto, thereby preventing flexibility since there is only a limited amount of stretching provided by the nylon fabric, which is between 1/32 inch and 1/16 inch thick. To address this problem, siping 5 is provided in the nylon covering surface 112, every three inches along the length of wind lock 11. This siping 5 is constituted by cuts in both the nylon fabric and the wind lock 11. Each cut is semi-circular, approximately ⅛ inch wide and ⅛ inch deep. Since the front surfaces 122 of the guides are not covered with the nylon lubricating/wear fabric, siping to enhance flexibility of these elements is not required.
It should be understood that the sipping 5 as depicted in
If other structures such as vertical reinforcing strip 16 (as depicted in
The use of an idler bar or shaft is a common feature in the conventional art of retractable flexible door operation. Conventional idler bar 7 is disclosed clearly in Appendix A, and
Another embodiment of the present invention adds further stabilization at the bottom bar 6. Conventional bottom bar structures are depicted generally in Appendix A. The present invention is depicted specifically in
While a number of embodiments have been described by way of example, the present invention is not limited thereto. Rather, the present invention should be construed to include any and all embodiments, variations, permutations, adaptations, and derivations that would occur to one skilled in this art with the teachings of the present invention. Accordingly, the present invention should be limited only by the following claims.
The present invention claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/278,829 filed on Oct. 13, 2009, making reference herein to same in its entirety.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61278829 | Oct 2009 | US |