The subject invention generally pertains to retractable safety barriers and more specifically to a heavy-duty barrier whose design features make it particularly suitable for impeding heaving loads such as, for example, a forklift at a loading dock platform.
Many retractable safety barriers for doorways have been developed to help prevent children and pets from entering certain areas. To selectively open or block a doorway, some barriers include a rollup panel that can be unrolled to extend across and block the doorway. When not in use or to allow passage, the panel can wrap about a roller for storage along one side of the doorway. A few examples of retractable barriers with rollup panels are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,636,679; 5,690,317; 6,536,502; 5,505,244; and 6,056,038.
Once such a rollup panel is extended across a doorway, usually some type of locking mechanism helps prevent the panel from unwrapping any farther so that the child or pet is unable to force the panel open. Such locking mechanisms typically include a little tab or pawl that engages a ratchet or some other type of tooth or slotted wheel, which in turn is coupled to the roller about which the panel is wrapped. The tab or pawl engaging the wheel hopefully prevents the roller from releasing the panel any farther. This may work well for light duty applications involving children and pets; however, such barriers do not appear adequate for industrial applications.
In factories, for example, a forklift and other material handling equipment may need to travel near operating equipment such as machine tools (machining centers, turning centers, etc.). A permanent guardrail may prevent a forklift from striking the machine, but the guardrail may also interfere with material handling equipment trying to load and unload the machine of its work pieces.
Truck loading docks may also have a need for a retractable barrier. A barrier may help prevent dockworkers and material handling equipment from accidentally falling off the edge of the dock's elevated platform. The platform's height is about the same as that of an average truck bed. Although a door typically exists at the edge of the platform, the door's strength may be insufficient to withstand the impact of a forklift, or the door may be left open for various reasons. The door, for instance, may be left open simply because the weather is nice, and the workers inside would like to enjoy some fresh air. With the door open, however, the loading dock platform may create a safety problem.
Although costly massive safety gates have been used at loading docks, they can take up a lot of space even when they are opened to allow passage through the doorway. Even though they may be able to stop a slowly moving forklift, an impact can cause considerable damage to the gate due to the gate's limited ability to resiliently absorb the impact. Also, permanent or other conventional guarding may not be suitable for loading dock areas, as such guarding may interfere with operating the door, loading and unloading trucks, and operating a dock leveler that may be installed at the platform.
A dock leveler is often installed at the loading dock platform to compensate for a height difference that may exist between the platform and the bed of the truck. A dock leveler typically includes a deck that is hinged at its back edge to raise or lower its front edge to generally match the height of the truck bed. Often an extension plate or lip is pivotally coupled to the deck to bridge the gap between the deck's front edge and a back edge of the truck bed. The deck and extended lip provide a path for forklifts to travel between the loading dock platform and the truck bed, thus facilitating loading or unloading of the truck. Unfortunately, a conventional barrier or guardrail extending over the dock leveler may restrict the deck's upward pivotal motion.
Since a dock leveler and the adjacent door move in the area where guarding may be needed, it becomes challenging to provide the area with a barrier that is movable yet sufficiently strong to impede heavy material handling equipment. Thus, a need exists for a movable, heavy-duty industrial barrier, which is more compact in its stored position, is more capable of stopping a forklift without significant damage, and incorporates a more cost-efficient design.
In some embodiments, a retractable rollup barrier is provided with substantial impact resistance by having the reactive force of the impact transfer directly between the barrier's retractable panel and its vertical support members without having to rely on the strength of the panel's take-up roller or the strength of the roller's anti-rotation mechanism.
In some embodiments, a retractable rollup barrier includes a stop member that is carried by the rollup panel itself.
In some embodiments, the stop member is an elongate member, such as a pipe, rod or bar that broadly distributes an impact reactive force over the height of the rollup panel.
In some embodiments, the stop member comprises multiple separate members on the same vertical line. The separate members could be a series of pipes, rods, or bars that work together to broadly distribute an impact reactive force over the height of a retractable panel.
In some embodiments, a retractable rollup barrier can be set for various doorway widths by simply repositioning a stop member's location on the rollup panel.
In some embodiments, the extent to which a rollup panel can extend out from within a housing is limited by a thicker section of the panel being unable to fit through a narrower slot in one of the barrier's support members.
In some embodiments, a retractable panel includes reinforcing straps that greatly increase the panel's strength.
In some embodiments, the reinforcing straps of the retractable panel can be of a different color than the rest of the panel so that the panel is clearly visible when in use.
In some embodiments, the panel includes a large warning label that is visible from a distance so that people in the area can see that a drop-off hazard exists even though a closed dock door may disguise the danger.
In some embodiments, the rollup panel does not reach its full extension from within its housing until the panel experiences an impact. This feature allows a distal end of the panel to be readily hooked or unhooked from an anchored support member without the panel having to be pulled tightly against a hard stop to do so.
In some embodiments, a retractable barrier straddles a dock leveler.
In some embodiments, two anchor support members of a retractable barrier can serve as bollard-like members for protecting the lateral edges of a door from damage.
In some embodiments, a distal end of a retractable panel can retract and stow within a pocket of a support member housing to protect the distal end from damage and avoid interfering with traffic when the retractable barrier is not in use.
A retractable safety barrier 10 primarily intended for heavy duty industrial use is shown in
Although barrier 10 is particularly suited for installation on an elevated platform 14 of a loading dock 16, barrier 10 can be readily applied to a broad range of heavy and light duty applications including, but not limited to, guarding machinery, guarding construction sites, restricting vehicular and pedestrian traffic, restraining cargo, restraining stock stored on high pallet racks, etc. Since the structure and function of various embodiments of barrier 10 may be similar regardless of the barrier's specific application, barrier 10 will be described with reference to its installation at loading dock 16.
Loading dock 16 may include a conventional dock leveler 18 whose pivotal deck 20 is presently shown at its cross-traffic position where the top surface of deck 20 is generally flush with platform 14. Dock 16 also includes a door 22 that can provide access to a truck parked at the dock. When a truck is not present, door 22 is normally closed and the need for barrier 10 may not be apparent; however, the strength of door 22 may be insufficient to withstand the impact of a forklift. In some cases, door 22 may be left open, as shown, even though no truck is present. If the weather outside is mild, for instance, door 22 may be left open to help ventilate the building.
Whether door 22 open or closed while no truck is present at the dock, platform 18 may create a falling hazard. A dockworker or material-handling vehicle, such as a forklift, may accidentally travel off the edge of platform 14 and fall onto the driveway just beyond doorway 12. To help prevent such an accident, some type of barrier could be installed across the doorway. The barrier, however, would need to be movable to permit loading or unloading a truck at the dock, not interfere with the operation of the door, permit the operation of the dock leveler, and not obstruct traffic in the vicinity of the dock.
To accomplish all of this, barrier 10 comprises a retractable panel 24 that can selectively extend and retract between two support members, which will be referred to as a first support member 26 and a second support member 28. Support members 26 and 28 may be attached to the floor of platform 18, attached to the wall of a building, and/or connected to adjacent structure (e.g., a doorway frame, door guide, etc.), wherein the adjacent structure is in turn attached to the building wall or the floor. In some cases, support members 26 and 28 are self-supporting members, wherein the members 26 and 28 are able to self-support their upper ends by simply having their lower ends be anchored to the floor. In some cases, support members 26 and 28 may be referred to as a “post,” wherein the term “post” refers to a member whose primary source of support comes from the floor. In a currently preferred embodiment, the “retractable”feature of panel 24 is provided by panel 24 being a pliable roll-up panel that retracts by wrapping about a roller 30, wherein roller 30 is just one example of a take-up member. Other methods of retracting a panel include, but are not limited to, folding or translating interconnected sections of the panel.
When panel 24 is pulled out from within first support member 26 and coupled to support member 28, as shown in
For the illustrated embodiment, of
In some cases, referring to
Roller 30 is installed between the upper and lower plates 46a and 46b with panel 24 extending through slot 56. The main section of panel 24 is sufficiently thin to slide through slot 56 with the proximal end 36 of panel 24 being inside housing 42 and the distal end 38 of panel 24 being on the other side of slot 56.
To urge roller 30 to its stored position, roller 30 is preferably associated with a retracting mechanism, such as a conventional torsion spring 60, which is schematically depicted by an arrow that indicates the direction that spring 60 urges roller 30. When panel 24 disconnects from second support member 28, spring 60 acting upon roller 30 draws panel 28 into first support member 26 for storage.
Referring to
To prevent impact force 76 from pulling panel 24 out from within first support member 26 or damaging roller 30 and its retracting mechanism, panel 24 carries a stop member 78, such as a pipe, bar, or other structure that is too thick to fit through slot 56. The structure surrounding slot 56 serves as a catch member 80 that prevents panel 24 from pulling stop member 78 out through slot 56. Thus, most of a reactive force 82 that opposes impact force 76 passes through panel 24 and first support member 26 and bypasses roller 30 due to the interaction between stop member 78 and catch member 80. Stop member 78 is preferably vertically elongate to evenly distribute reactive force 82 across the height of panel 24.
To fit barrier 10 to various width doorways, stop member 78 can be selectively inserted into one of several possible sleeves 84, 86 or 88 that are sewn or otherwise attached to panel 24. In this example, each sleeve comprises three vertically spaced apart loops formed of the same material as the panel's reinforcing straps. Stop member 78 is inserted in the selected sleeve while that sleeve is on the roller side of slot 56, thus the chosen sleeve determines how far panel 24 can extend out from within first support member 26.
The horizontal spacing between sleeves 84, 86 and 88 enables the length of barrier 10 to be adjusted in discrete increments equal to the spacing between adjacent sleeves. Finer length adjustments can be achieved by changing the location of where mounting plate 72 of hook assembly 64 is attached to support member 28. In selecting a location, second support member 28 includes several series of mounting holes 90 from which to choose. The actual spacing between adjacent sleeves of panel 24, and the spacing between adjacent vertical rows of holes 90 can vary depending on the design; however, in some embodiments sleeves 84, 86 and 88 are spaced at twelve-inch increments, and the rows of holes 90 are horizontally spaced at three-inch increments, so the extended length of panel 24 can be adjusted in three-inch increments over a length of 24 inches.
Minor reconfiguration of support members 26 and 28 allow interchanging their locations so that either support member can be on the right or left side of a doorway. For doorway 12, for example, support members 26 and 28 can be reinstalled as shown in
To warn others in the area of dock 16 that a drop-off hazard may exist, even when door 22 is closed, panel 24 may be of contrasting colors (e.g., red and yellow, black and yellow, etc.). In some embodiments, for example, straps 34 are yellow and web 32 is red. Alternatively or in addition to, a warning label 100 can be prominently displayed on panel 24 to suggest that a safety hazard exists.
An alternate configuration allows the retractable barrier system to be used with multiple doorways.
The retractable barrier system shown in
To provide a barrier for open doorway 12, panel 24 is pulled out from within first support member 26 and coupled to third support member 29. A barrier can also be provided for open doorway 112 by pulling panel 124 out from within third support member 29 and coupling it to second support member 28, as shown in
Although
Although the invention is described with reference to a preferred embodiment, it should be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that various modifications are well within the scope of the invention. Therefore, the scope of the invention is to be determined by reference to the following claims:
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/809,119, filed Mar. 25, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,207,370.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
516486 | Hartshorn | Mar 1894 | A |
0778228 | Dodge et al. | Dec 1904 | A |
824930 | Hopkins | Jul 1906 | A |
832335 | McDonald | Oct 1906 | A |
1477159 | Zinser | Dec 1923 | A |
1652186 | Strauss | Dec 1927 | A |
1666508 | Sawyer | Apr 1928 | A |
1828296 | Sawyer | Oct 1931 | A |
RE18940 | Traut | Sep 1933 | E |
2088046 | White | Jul 1937 | A |
2295205 | Fraser | Sep 1942 | A |
2678691 | Rust et al. | May 1954 | A |
3090425 | Carlo | May 1963 | A |
3115182 | Bobbitt | Dec 1963 | A |
3146824 | Veilleux | Sep 1964 | A |
3314468 | Riedel | Apr 1967 | A |
3581798 | Malamed | Jun 1971 | A |
3803943 | Woloszyk | Apr 1974 | A |
4119301 | Payne | Oct 1978 | A |
4356668 | Wagner | Nov 1982 | A |
5005827 | Steinbrecher | Apr 1991 | A |
5029819 | Kane | Jul 1991 | A |
5050846 | Goodman et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5078197 | Weishar | Jan 1992 | A |
5118056 | Jeanise | Jun 1992 | A |
5170829 | Duncan et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5271183 | Hahn et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5299386 | Naegelli et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5353859 | Oltahfer et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5459963 | Alexander | Oct 1995 | A |
5503211 | Engi | Apr 1996 | A |
5505244 | Thumann | Apr 1996 | A |
5564238 | Ellis | Oct 1996 | A |
5624203 | Jackson et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5636679 | Miller et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5649396 | Carr | Jul 1997 | A |
5660144 | Venti | Aug 1997 | A |
5690317 | Sandsborg | Nov 1997 | A |
5752557 | Crider et al. | May 1998 | A |
5823705 | Jackson et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5875597 | Gingrich et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6056038 | Foster et al. | May 2000 | A |
6142701 | Falcon | Nov 2000 | A |
6186274 | Reynolds et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6244324 | Quates et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6279276 | Knoll | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6375164 | Siegler et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375165 | Sherratt et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6485225 | Baker | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6536502 | Britto et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6575435 | Kotzen | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6595496 | Langlie et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6688480 | Denny | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6715973 | Faber et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6733204 | Paniccia | May 2004 | B1 |
6776398 | Tsai | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6807999 | Bowen et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6830236 | de Lorenzo | Dec 2004 | B2 |
20020170688 | Daus et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030016996 | Gelfand et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030079845 | Stern, Jr. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030111657 | Green | Jun 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060213626 A1 | Sep 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10809119 | Mar 2004 | US |
Child | 11343010 | US |