Various embodiments relate generally to retractable security latches.
Security latches may be used, for example, to restrict access to storage compartments. For example, security latches may be used to prevent unwanted access to a cabinet or drawers. For example, parents may want to prevent their children from accessing a drawer (e.g., containing sharp objects) and/or a cabinet (e.g., containing toxic materials) using security latches.
Apparatus and associated methods relate to a selectively operated folding safety latch having an active mode and a stowed mode. In an illustrative example, a retractable safety latch may include a tongue element extending in a first plane and a base element extending in a second plane. The tongue element, for example, may include multiple mode selection slots. The base element may include a brace slot. For example, one of the multiple mode selection slots and the brace slot may receive a security pin long a longitudinal axis so that a predetermined mode is selected. In the active mode, the tongue element extends away from the base element to releasably engage a striker element. In the inactive mode, the first plane and the second plane are substantially parallel such that the tongue element is prevented from engaging the striker element. Various embodiments may advantageously provide quick switching security latch operations.
Various embodiments may achieve one or more advantages. For example, some embodiments may include a cylindrical hook with a first radius (D1) configured to releasably coupled to a substantially cylindrical locking member with a second radius (D2) of the striker element, wherein D1<D2, to advantageously provide partially openings for ventilation. Some embodiments may, for example, include, a locking pin to advantageously strengthen the position of the tongue element. Some embodiments, for example, may provide multiple mounting mechanisms to conveniently attach the base element to a door. For example, some embodiments may include a wireless communication module configured to advantageously notify a predetermined device that the tongue element may be disengaged.
Various embodiments may advantageously provide security latches that reduces or eliminates inconvenience in accessing compartments when security is not needed. Sometimes, if a person forgets that security latches are activated, opening the latches forcefully may result in damage to a storage structure (e.g., a door, drawer, cabinetry, or other structure), injury and/or discomfort to a user, or some combination thereof. Damage to the security latch itself may, for example, render the latch inoperable. Accordingly, various embodiments may advantageously prevent discomfort and/or damage to latches, compartments, and/or users. In some cases, the damage may render the latch unusable on the storage structure.
The details of various embodiments are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features and advantages will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
Like reference symbols in the various drawings indicate like elements.
To aid understanding, this document is organized as follows. First, to help introduce discussion of various embodiments, an exemplary retractable security latch (RSL) is introduced with reference to
The latch tongue 200 or 250 can be positioned in an active state, as in
As an illustrative example, the latch tongue 200 may be extending in a first plane. For example, the latch base 100 may be extending in a second plane. For example, when the pintle-brace 300 is operated into the pintle-brace hole 124 and the pintle hole 204, the boss 308 may slidingly engage at least a the active lock slot 206 or the inactive lock slot 208 of the latch tongue 200 and the brace slots (on the brace knuckle 108 and the security knuckle 110) of the latch base 100, For examples, the latch tongue 200 and the latch base 100 may be selectively coupled in the active mode or the inactive mode. In some implementations, in an active mode, the latch tongue 200 may away from the latch base 100 to releasably engage a striker element. In the inactive mode, in some implementations, the latch tongue 200 is parallel to the latch base 100 and does not engage the striker element.
In some implementations, the hook 224 may have a substantially cylindrical cavity with a first radius (D1). For example, the cavity may be configured to releasably couples to a substantially cylindrical locking member 604 with a second radius (D2) of the striker embodiment 600. In some examples, D1<D2, for example, to disengage the tongue element and the strike element, a downward force larger than a predestined disengagement force may be applied at the tongue element 200.
To move the latch into the active position, the steps above are repeated with the exception that the latch tongue 200 or 250 is rotated until the guide track stop 220 contacts the guide fin 120. At this point, the active lock slot 206 is aligned with the boss 308 of the pintle-brace 300, and the latch can be secured in the active position by reinserting the pintle-brace 300 and securing it with the security pin 350.
Accordingly, the reader will see that the various embodiments of the retractable security latch with striker allow for the user to activate and deactivate the security latch to restrict access into a storage compartment at will, without the need for frequent removal and reinstallation of the latch, intrusion into the storage space, and/or parts that may wear and require replacement of the entire latch over time. Accordingly, the security latch with striker may reduce frequency of installation and removal of the security latch to resume normal operation of the storage compartment closeout to advantageously avoids damage to the existing structure.
In some implementations, the security latch may reduce risk of snagging or impingement while in the inactive position due to the low profile of the security latch in said position. In some implementations, the security latch may provide an extra layer of security against inadvertent release, or release by a determined individual for whom the latch is intended to restrict access, by virtue of the process for releasing the latch from the positive lock open or ajar position. In some implementations, the security latch may allow modular replacement of any broken or worn parts to advantageously reduce the need to replace the entire security latch by virtue of the modular design. In some implementations, the security latch may advantageously provide multiple configuration options that are compatible with various cabinet storage compartment designs. In some implementations, the security latch may advantageously provide installation flexibility while maintaining the intended functionality.
Although various embodiments have been described with reference to the figures, other embodiments are possible. For example, although an exemplary system has been described with reference to the figures, other implementations may be deployed in other industrial, scientific, medical, commercial, and/or residential applications.
As an illustrative example, the pintle-brace can be formed with a mating surface meant to engage a detent within the structure of the base that would eliminate the need for the security pin.
In some implementations, the shape of the security pin may, for example, be oval. In some implementations, the shape of the security pin may, for example, be polygonal (e.g., square, triangle).
In some implementations, other materials may become available that provide improved functionality or durability.
In some implementations, by way of example and not limitation, the alignment notch on the pintle-brace can be replaced with any other type of demarcation device that would allow for proper alignment of the pintle-brace to facilitate rotation of the tongue into the active or inactive position. In some implementations, a demarcation device may include, for example, different colors (e.g., red for inactive, green for active). Some implementations may provide, for example, a full perimeter groove and/or a line as at least part of a demarcation device.
In some implementations, sliding gears and/or other such mechanisms can be used, for example, to allow for rotation of the tongue and/or locking into the active, inactive, or a greater number of positions. In some examples the sliding gears and/or other such mechanisms may be used in place of the pintle-brace.
In some implementations, the base or strikers can be optimized to reduce weight and materials (e.g., including removal of one or more of the fastener holes). In some implementations, the base and tongue can be made longer or shorter to facilitate different applications.
In some implementations, the tongue may, for example, be of a different shape. In some implementations, the engagement mechanism for the tongue and striker may, for example, be of different shapes.
In some implementations, the tongue, base, and/or strikers can be connected to a sensor (e.g., Wi-Fi enabled) that would alert a connected monitoring device, such as a cell phone, television, or tablet, of (any) attempts to disengage the security latch, etc.
In an illustrative example, an improved security latch uses a cantilever mounted tongue with a two-position hinge knuckle that provides positive locking in active and inactive positions, as well as a low profile and ease of operation. This design may, for example, allow for mounting either by fasteners or an adhesive on the mating surfaces. One embodiment of the tongue and the included striker configurations may, for example, allow for positive locking of a cabinet door or drawer in a slightly open position to provide ventilation into the storage compartment while still restricting access to the contents within. In some implementations, no springs are used. Such spring-less implementations may, for example, extend lifetime reliability of the latch relative to latches requiring springs.
Accordingly, several advantages include, by way of example and not limitation, providing positive locking of the latch in the inactive position, positive locking of the door or drawer or other access device that allows for ventilation while still restricting access to the storage contents, a low profile that does not significantly intrude into the storage space, customizable configurations of the latch and striker combinations to suit different applications, ease of installation and assembly, modular components that provide easy repairability should it become necessary, and/or improved convenience for the user. Additional advantages will become apparent from a review of the description and the accompanying drawings.
In an illustrative aspect, a retractable safety latch may include a tongue element extending in a first plane. The retractable safety latch may include a base element extending in a second plane. The tongue element and the base element may each include a channel extending along a hinge axis at an intersection of the first plane and the second plane. The retractable safety latch may include a selection pin extending along a longitudinal axis. The retractable safety latch may include a security pin. The security pin may include a pin head. The security pin may include a pin shaft configured to engage a locking element of the selection pin. When the selection pin is operated into the channels such that the hinge axis and the longitudinal axis are parallel, at least a first locking feature of the selecting pin may slidingly engage at least a second locking feature of the tongue element and a third locking feature of the base element having the selection pin being locked into a selected position such that the tongue element and the base element are selectively coupled in one of multiple predetermined modes. In an active mode of the multiple predetermined modes, the first plane and the second plane may intersect such that the tongue element extends away from the base element to releasably engage a striker element. In a stowage mode of the multiple predetermined modes, the first plane and the second plane may be substantially parallel such that the tongue element does not engage the striker element.
The tongue element may include a hook having a substantially cylindrical cavity with a first radius (D1). The cylindrical cavity may be configured such that the hook releasably couples to a substantially cylindrical locking member of the striker element with a second radius (D2) of the striker element. D1 may be less than D2 such that, to disengage the tongue element and the striker element, a force applied at the tongue element may be required to exceed a predetermined disengagement force.
The retractable safety latch may include an elongated member coupling the hook to a body of the tongue element. The elongated member may extend parallel to the body of the tongue element. The elongated member may be configured such that, when the tongue element is selectively coupled to the striker element, the hook retains a margin of freedom against the cylindrical locking member to prevent failure of the tongue element.
The base element may include a front channel and a back channel such that, when the base element is coupled to the tongue element, the channel of the tongue element registers with the front channel and the back channel, and the selection pin is inserted through the first channel, the channel of the tongue element, and the back channel.
The channel of the base element may include an insertion aperture at a first end for inserting the selection pin and a release aperture at a second end for inserting the locking pin of the third locking feature such that, when the locking pin is operated into the release aperture, the selection pin is at least partially removed from the channel.
The first locking feature may include a selection fin. The second locking feature may include multiple mode selection slots. Each of the multiple mode selection slots may correspond to one of the predetermined multiple modes, such that when the selection fin is registered into one of the multiple mode selection slots, the corresponding one of the predetermined multiple modes is selected.
The base element may be mounted on a mating surface by adhesive. The base element may be mounted on a mating surface by fasteners.
In an illustrative aspect a retractable safety latch may include a tongue element extending in a first plane. The retractable safety latch may include a base element extending in a second plane. The tongue element and the base element may each include a channel extending along a hinge axis at an intersection of the first plane and the second plane. The retractable safety latch may include a selection pin extending along a longitudinal axis. When the selection pin is operated into the channels such that the hinge axis and the longitudinal axis are parallel, at least a first locking feature of the selecting pin may slidingly engage at least a second locking feature of the tongue element and a third locking feature of the base element such that the tongue element and the base element are selectively coupled in one of multiple predetermined modes. In an active mode of the multiple predetermined modes, the first plane and the second plane may intersect such that the tongue element extends away from the base element to releasably engage a striker element. In a stowage mode of the multiple predetermined modes, the first plane and the second plane may be substantially parallel such that the tongue element does not engage the striker element.
The element may include a hook having a substantially cylindrical cavity with a first radius (D1). The cylindrical cavity may be configured such that the hook releasably couples to a substantially cylindrical locking member of the striker element with a second radius (D2) of the striker element. D1 may be less than D2 such that, to disengage the tongue element and the striker element, a force applied at the tongue element may be required exceed a predetermined disengagement force.
The retractable safety latch may include an elongated member coupling the hook to a body of the tongue element. The elongated member may extend substantially parallel to the body of the tongue element. The elongated member may be configured such that, when the tongue element is selectively coupled to the striker element, the hook retains a margin of freedom against the cylindrical locking member to prevent failure of the tongue element.
The common element may include a hook having a wall of a predetermined height extended orthogonally to the tongue element such that, in the active mode, to disengage the tongue member and the striker element, a force applied at the tongue element must displace the hook by at least the predetermined height.
The base element may include a front channel and a back channel such that, when the base element is coupled to the tongue element, the channel of the tongue element registers with the front channel and the back channel, and the selection pin is inserted through the first channel, the channel of the tongue element, and the back channel.
The channel of the base element may include an insertion aperture at a first end for inserting the selection pin, and a release aperture at a second end for inserting the locking pin of the third locking feature such that, when the locking pin is operated into the release aperture, the selection pin is at least partially removed from the channel.
The retractable safety latch may include a security pin. The security pin may include a pin head. The security pin may include a pin shaft configured to engage a locking element of the selection pin such that the selection pin is locked into a position at one of the multiple predetermined modes.
The first locking feature may include a selection fin. The second locking features may include multiple mode selection slots. Each of the multiple mode selection slot may correspond to one of the predetermined multiple modes, such that when the selection fin is registered to one of the multiple mode selection slots, the corresponding one of the predetermined multiple modes is selected.
The base element may be mounted on a mating surface by adhesive. The base element may be mounted on a mating surface by fasteners.
In an illustrative aspect retractable safety latch may include a tongue element having a hook with a substantially cylindrical cavity with a first radius (D1). The cylindrical cavity may be configured such that the hook releasably couples to a substantially cylindrical locking member with a second radius (D2) of a striker element. D1 may be less than D2 such that, to disengage the tongue element and the striker element, a force applied at the tongue element must exceed a predetermined disengagement force.
The retractable safety latch may include an elongated member coupling the hook to a body of the tongue element. The elongated member may extend parallel to the body of the tongue element. The elongated member may be configured such that, when the tongue element is selectively coupled to the striker element, the hook retains a predetermined margin of freedom against the cylindrical locking member to prevent failure of the tongue element.
A number of implementations have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made. For example, advantageous results may be achieved if the steps of the disclosed techniques were performed in a different sequence, or if components of the disclosed systems were combined in a different manner, or if the components were supplemented with other components. Accordingly, other implementations are contemplated within the scope of the following claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 63/185,690, titled “Retractable Security Latch with Striker,” filed by Andre Glenn Forrest, on May 7, 2021. This application incorporates the entire contents of the foregoing application(s) herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
516546 | McCauley | Mar 1894 | A |
618895 | Munday | Feb 1899 | A |
737360 | Daly | Aug 1903 | A |
1052701 | Watters | Feb 1913 | A |
1155953 | Morrow | Oct 1915 | A |
1646580 | Eastman | Oct 1927 | A |
2990572 | Schwartzberg | Jul 1961 | A |
3538539 | Allison | Nov 1970 | A |
3877739 | Cowen | Apr 1975 | A |
4159153 | Yoshikawa | Jun 1979 | A |
4416477 | Bialobrzeski | Nov 1983 | A |
4605353 | Hahn | Aug 1986 | A |
4632438 | McKinney | Dec 1986 | A |
4717184 | Boyce | Jan 1988 | A |
5035451 | Brady | Jul 1991 | A |
5172097 | Arnold | Dec 1992 | A |
5344226 | Lee | Sep 1994 | A |
5445451 | Harmony | Aug 1995 | A |
5626372 | Vogt | May 1997 | A |
5645304 | Richardson et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5711053 | Hafner | Jan 1998 | A |
5765263 | Bolinas | Jun 1998 | A |
5774938 | Kent | Jul 1998 | A |
5887317 | Baker | Mar 1999 | A |
5966778 | Ray | Oct 1999 | A |
6079754 | Alexy | Jun 2000 | A |
6092264 | Banks | Jul 2000 | A |
6250694 | Weiland | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6942257 | Wong | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7000290 | Ace | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7150073 | Stewart | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7278183 | Schluter | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7686353 | Lewis | Mar 2010 | B2 |
8307513 | Fitzgerald | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8522400 | Jablonski | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8732906 | Van Gennep | May 2014 | B1 |
9068382 | Hall | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9194166 | Spiegel | Nov 2015 | B1 |
9909035 | Caldeira | Mar 2018 | B1 |
10208510 | Van Dyck | Feb 2019 | B1 |
10247230 | McCullough | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10837202 | Andersen | Nov 2020 | B2 |
11053722 | Teta | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11085215 | VanVolkinburg | Aug 2021 | B1 |
20090133223 | McAfee | May 2009 | A1 |
20110094058 | Van Gennep | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20120205922 | Choi | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130219664 | Burda | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140173852 | Heninger | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20150132053 | Kamada | May 2015 | A1 |
20170022740 | Hall | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170211303 | Stots | Jul 2017 | A9 |
20170275928 | Kozlowski | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20190032372 | Andersen | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190234125 | Sato | Aug 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
8205440 | Aug 1983 | BR |
202152579 | Feb 2012 | CN |
203515010 | Apr 2014 | CN |
3637244 | Nov 1986 | DE |
202004003247 | Jun 2004 | DE |
10341145 | Apr 2005 | DE |
102013102319 | Sep 2014 | DE |
1293629 | Mar 2003 | EP |
1293629 | May 2005 | EP |
1927709 | Jun 2008 | EP |
2943088 | Sep 2010 | FR |
100551094 | May 2009 | KR |
20110105293 | Mar 2010 | KR |
WO-9516095 | Jun 1995 | WO |
2005040530 | May 2005 | WO |
WO-2011069001 | Jun 2011 | WO |
WO-2018146416 | Aug 2018 | WO |
2019029792 | Feb 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Espacenet machine translation WO 2018146416 A1 published Aug. 16, 2018 (Year: 2023). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority in related International Application No. PCT/US2022/072154, dated Nov. 4, 2022, 22 pages. |
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees in related International Application No. PCT/US2022/072154, dated Jul. 19, 2022, 15 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Preliminary Examining Authority in related International Application No. PCT/US2022/072154, dated May 4, 2023, 19 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in related International Application No. PCT/US2022/072154, dated Aug. 14, 2023, 46 pages. |
“Amazon.com: Safety 1st Adhesive Cabinet 4 Piece Latch for Childproofing, White: Baby.” retrieved from the internet Mar. 28, 2022, <https://www.amazon.com/Safety-1st-Adhesive-Cabinet-Childproofing/dp/B07PZH65V3?th=1 >. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220356738 A1 | Nov 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63185690 | May 2021 | US |