1. Field of the Invention
The present invention is related to electromechanical polymer (EMP) actuators. In particular, the present invention is related to applications of EMP actuators to keyboards or keypads of electronic devices, such as desktop and notebook computers.
2. Discussion of the Related Art
In some conventional keyboards, each key is seated on a snap dome that acts as a force resistor. The snap dome returns the key to the upright position after a depression by a user. However, conventional snap domes are incapable of lying flat in a stable state. The need to be ready for keyboard operation requires the snap domes to always return to their upright positions.
According to one embodiment of the present invention, a retractable snap dome in a keyboard, in addition to serving as a force resistor for a key in a conventional manner, includes an additional collapsed state in which the key can be retracted by an electromechanical polymer (EMP) actuator to a persistent down position. In one embodiment, the EMP actuator is a bimorph EMP actuator that can be actuated to bring the key from the down position to the up position, ready for conventional keyboard operation, and vice versa. Such operations allow the keyboard to have a desirable decreased thickness relative to conventional keyboards. Thus, a keyboard of the present invention finds application in ultra-slim electronic devices. When provided in a notebook computer in which the keyboard is folded against a video or graphic display, the keys of the keyboard may be placed in the retracted down position, thereby preventing the keys from pressing against the video or graphical display with a force that may damage the display.
The present invention is better understood upon consideration of the detailed description below in conjunction with the drawings.
In the figures and the detailed description below, like reference numerals denote like features.
Sections 101-1 and 101-5 are also joined by hinge bars 103-1, 103-2 and 103-3 which form a bi-stable hinge between sections 101-1 and 101-5 of retractable snap dome 100. The bi-stable hinge has a first bi-stable state and a second bi-stable state, as described in further details below. As shown in
An electromechanical polymer (EMP) actuator typically includes one or more EMP layers formed out of a relaxor ferroelectric fluoropolymer and electrodes bonded thereto. When an external electric field is imposed across an EMP layer, the EMP layer becomes charged. The EMP layer thus behaves electrically as a capacitor. The electric field also provides an electromechanical response in the form of elongation in the transverse directions relative to the imposed electric field. The electromechanical property of the EMP layer is used to create the EMP actuator. EMP actuators are described, for example, in copending U.S. patent application (“Copending Application”), Ser. No. 13/683,963, entitled “Localized Multimodal Electromechanical Polymer Tranducers,” filed on Nov. 21, 2012, naming B. Zellers et al. as inventors. The Copending Application is hereby incorporated by reference herein.
In the middle portion,
In the right portion,
According to one embodiment of the present invention, EMP actuator 105 may be actuated to bring retractable snap dome 100 to a collapsed position that may persist indefinitely, even after electrical stimulation is withdrawn.
As mentioned above, hinge bars 103-1, 103-2 and 103-3 form the bi-stable hinge. (The bi-stable hinge can also be formed by an elastic ribbon, as also mentioned above). The two bi-stable states are lower energy configurations than the unstable intermediate state in which curved boundaries 104-1 and 104-2 have the greatest distance from each other at hinge bars 103-1 and 103-3. This configuration compresses hinge bar 103-2 and puts hinge bars 101-1 and 101-3 in greatest tension. The unstable state may resolve into either one of the bi-stable states, in which hinge bars 103-1 and 103-3 are relatively unstrained. As further electrical stimulation is applied to EMP actuator 105, retractable snap dome 100 flattens to the right, the tension in each of hinge bars 101-1 and 101-3 increases towards the unstable state. When the bi-stable hinge reaches the unstable state, further bending of EMP actuator 105 pushes the bi-stable hinge to rapidly snap into the second bi-stable state. At this point, retractable snap dome 100 has buckled and collapsed to the right, as shown in the middle portion of
As mentioned above, EMP actuator 105 remains charged even when power is withdrawn. Even when disconnected from power, EMP actuator 105 maintains its mechanical state at the time of power disconnection. Therefore, if power is disconnected after the bi-stable hinge settles in the second bi-stable state, EMP actuator 105 locks retractable snap dome 100 in the collapsed state, as shown in the right portion of
To return retractable snap dome 100 to the upright position, EMP actuator 105 may be provided the electrical stimulation in reverse from that illustrated by
In one embodiment, EMP actuator 105 produces a force in the ˜10 g range to facilitate retractable snap dome 100 to rise to the upright state or to fall to the collapsed state through the action of the bi-stable hinge. (Movement in the bi-stable hinge is realized by a weak pull/push horizontal force). In comparison, from the locked-down upright position of retractable snap dome 100, a downward force in the range of ˜50-200 g is required to collapse retractable snap dome 100 in conventional operation.
A retractable snap dome of the present invention consumes power only for collapsing the structure for storage or returning the structure back to its upright position. In a keyboard application, for example, the EMP actuator is not involved in the conventional typing operation, and thus the advantages are achieved with little power consumption.
The above detailed description is provided to illustrate specific embodiments of the present invention and is not intended to be limiting. Numerous variations and variations within the scope of the present invention is possible. The present invention is set forth in the accompanying claims.
The present application is related to and claims priority of U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/894,324, filed on Oct. 22, 2013, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes as if fully set forth herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4722146 | Kemeny | Feb 1988 | A |
4982866 | Krawagna | Jan 1991 | A |
5263876 | Johnescu et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5315204 | Park | May 1994 | A |
5350966 | Culp | Sep 1994 | A |
5519278 | Kahn et al. | May 1996 | A |
6376971 | Pelrine et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6423412 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6605246 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6703257 | Takeuchi et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6787238 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6809462 | Pelrine et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6877325 | Lawless | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6888291 | Arbogast et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7038357 | Goldenberg et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7301114 | Sano | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7339572 | Schena | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7368862 | Pelrine et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7567681 | Pelrine et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7944735 | Bertin et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7952261 | Lipton et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7971850 | Heim et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8222799 | Polyakov et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8362882 | Heubel et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8384271 | Kwon et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8390594 | Modarres et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8427441 | Paleczny et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8564181 | Choi et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
20070152974 | Kim et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070200466 | Heim | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070200467 | Heydt et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080157631 | Heim | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080284277 | Kwon et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090002205 | Klinghult et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090002328 | Ullrich et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090200336 | Koh | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100079264 | Hoellwarth | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100090813 | Je et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100316242 | Cohen et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110038625 | Zellers et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110133598 | Jenninger et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110290686 | Huang | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120017703 | Ikebe et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120105333 | Maschmeyer et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120121944 | Yamamoto et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120126663 | Jenninger et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120126959 | Zarrabi et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120128960 | Busgen et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120178880 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120194448 | Rothkopf | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120206248 | Biggs | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120223880 | Birnbaum et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130207793 | Weaber et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140035735 | Zellers et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140085065 | Biggs et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140090424 | Charbonneau et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140139328 | Zellers et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140139329 | Ramstein et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140139436 | Ramstein et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140140551 | Ramstein | May 2014 | A1 |
20140191973 | Zellers et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2010283926 | Dec 2010 | JP |
2011172339 | Sep 2011 | JP |
2012134998 | Jul 2012 | JP |
20060107259 | Oct 2006 | KR |
20110110212 | Oct 2011 | KR |
20120013273 | Feb 2012 | KR |
20120063318 | Jun 2012 | KR |
20120078529 | Jul 2012 | KR |
20120105785 | Sep 2012 | KR |
2010085575 | Jul 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Matysek, Marc et al., “Combined Driving and Sensing Circuitry for Dielectric Elastomer Actuators in mobile applications”, Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices (EAPAD) 2011, Proc. of SPIE vol. 7976, 797612, 11 pages. |
Neese, Bret et al., “Large Electrocaloric Effect in Ferroelectric Polymers Near Room Temperature”, Science vol. 321, Aug. 8, 2008, pp. 821-823. |
Zhang Q. M. et al., “Giant Electrostriction and Relaxor Ferroelectric Behavior in Electron-Irradiated Poly(vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene) Copolymer”, Science vol. 280, Jun. 26, 1998, pp. 2101-2104. |
Xia F. et al., “High Electromechanical Responses in a Poly(vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene-chlorofluoroethylene) Terpolymer”, Advanced Materials, vol. 14, issue 21, Nov. 2002, pp. 1574-1577. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion date of mailing Dec. 23, 2013, International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/053594, 9 pages. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion date of mailing Mar. 17, 2014, International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/071085, 10 pages. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion date of mailing Mar. 13, 2014, International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/071072, 15 pages. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion date of mailing Mar. 20, 2014, International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/071075, 12 pages. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion date of mailing Mar. 28, 2014, International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/071078, 13 pages. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion date of mailing Apr. 28, 2014, International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/071062, 11 pages. |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 26, 2015, International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/071072, 9 pages. |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 26, 2015, International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/071075, 9 pages. |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 26, 2015, International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/071078, 10 pages. |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 26, 2015, International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/071085, 7 pages. |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jul. 7, 2015, International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2013/003212, 15 pages. |
PCT International Written Opinion date of mailing Oct. 15, 2014, International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2013/003212, 20 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150107976 A1 | Apr 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61894324 | Oct 2013 | US |