This application is a U.S. national stage filing under 35 USC §371 of International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2010/001056, filed on Apr. 12, 2010.
This disclosure generally relates to elevators and more particularly relates to retractable stop for controlling the travel range of an elevator system during normal or maintenance operation.
Low overhead elevators have become increasingly popular. As opposed to traditional elevators which include motors, governors, and associated cabling in a machine room at the top of vertical hoistways in which the elevators move, low overhead elevators do not require placement of such components at the top of the hoistways. For example, some low overhead elevators may provide the driving force through machines located above the elevator roof but without the provision of a machine room. In so doing, such low overhead elevators conserve valuable space in the commercial and residential buildings in which they operate.
When a service technician wants to inspect or service the pulleys, hoisting cables, guide rails, machine controls or any other device at the upper end of the hoistway, he or she usually needs to do so on top of an elevator car. The cars may be designed to slowly approach the desired locations, such as by using a control system as disclosed in a co-pending application published as WO 2008/004022. In order to maintain the safety of the technician, extra preventive measures have been developed to stop the upward movement of the car as it approaches the top of the hoistway to provide ample space for the technician. This is particularly important in the case of low overhead elevators, in which there is less clearance between the top of car and the top of the hoistway.
One of the preventative measures is a retractable stop provided at the pit floor of the elevator system to block further downward movement of a counterweight when deployed. An example of this is disclosed in another co-pending application published as WO 2008/002300. As the counterweight is operatively connected to the elevator car, stopping downward movement of the counterweight necessarily stops upward movement of the car. When the elevator operates under normal mode, the stop is retracted to allow the counterweight to downwardly extend to its full range.
When deployed, a triangular support structure is formed among a horizontal strike plate, an oblique stop member and a vertical mounting channel, in which the horizontal impact plate blocks the downward movement of the counterweight with the impact force transmitted into the pit floor through the mounting channel and support member. However, the triangular configuration necessarily requires the support member to bear some horizontal vector of the impact force. As a result, the support member has to be constructed with sufficient lateral dimension and heft to provide the needed structural rigidity.
Meanwhile, the dimensions and location of the elevator car and counterweight are restricted by the limited space within the hoistway. In order to maintain safe operation of the elevator car in its full range, a minimum clearance (e.g. 25 mm) is required between the fully retracted stop and counterweight to accommodate any incidental horizontal movement of the counterweight within the hoistway. However, because of its relatively thick lateral profile necessary to maintain adequate structural rigidity, the existing stop may fail to meet the minimum clearance requirement. One solution is to create a longitudinal groove on the surface of the counterweight (including the counterweight frame and counterweight filler) that faces the retractable stop to provide the extra clearance. While effective, this necessarily requires modification of the existing elevator system or creation of a specifically configured counterweight, either of which adds significant expense to the design.
Hence, there is a need for a retractable stop with an improved lateral profile that meets the minimum clearance requirement when used with a conventional counterweight without imparting significant additional cost. Moreover, there is a need for a retractable stop that has an improved lateral profile in a retracted position without sacrificing the load bearing capacity in a deployed position.
In satisfaction of the aforementioned needs, a retractable stop and the method of use thereof to control travel range of an elevator system are disclosed. The retractable stop may include a vertical mounting bracket, an impact plate, and a support member. The support member may include an upper end pivotably connected to the distal portion of the impact plate and a lower end movable in relation to the mounting bracket.
In another aspect of this disclosure, a method of using the disclosed retractable stop to control travel range of an elevator assembly comprising an elevator counterweight having a vertical trajectory is disclosed. The method may include the steps of providing a retractable stop, the stop comprising an impact plate and a support member having an upper end pivotably connected to the impact plate; and extending the stop into a deployed position in which the impact plate is at least substantially horizontal and within the vertical trajectory of the counterweight and in which the support member is at least substantially vertical.
Other advantages and features of the disclosed retractable stop and method of use thereof will be described in greater detail below. It will also be noted here and elsewhere that the device or method disclosed herein may be suitably modified to be used in a wide variety of applications by one of ordinary skill in the art without undue experimentation.
For a more complete understanding of the disclosed device and method, reference should be made to the embodiments illustrated in greater detail in the accompanying drawings, wherein:
It should be understood that the drawings are not necessarily to scale and that the disclosed embodiments are sometimes illustrated diagrammatically and in partial views. In certain instances, details which are not necessary for an understanding of the disclosed device or method which render other details difficult to perceive may have been omitted. It should be understood, of course, that this disclosure is not limited to the particular embodiments illustrated herein.
This disclosure is generally directed to a safety device that maintains a desired amount of overhead clearance for a service technician operating on top of an elevator car in a hoistway. In particular, the device is a retractable stop that prevents further downward movement of a counterweight when deployed, thereby ensuring that the corresponding elevator car will not move above a selected height within the hoistway. As the device is generally mounted on a stationary vertical surface (e.g. a car guide) of an elevator system, “proximal” is used in this disclosure to refer to a direction toward the vertical surface while “distal” is used to refer to a direction away from the vertical surface.
A prior art retractable stop with a triangular configuration is schematically illustrated in
In a deployed position as illustrated in
In a retracted position as illustrated in
However, because of the lateral vector inherent to the triangular stop 10, the stop member 12 needs to be of a sufficient thickness and rigidity to sustain the impact force of the counterweight 19 when the stop 10 is deployed. Moreover, because of the sliding engagement of the strike plate 13 with the car guide, the strike plate 13 cannot be folded into a substantially or completely vertical position when the stop is retracted, which, in combination with the thickness of the stop member, may result in a lateral profile that cannot meet the minimum clearance requirement (e.g. 25 mm) between the stop and a conventional counterweight, as discussed earlier in this disclosure. One solution is to modify the counterweight 19 to include a vertical groove 19a as illustrated in
To address the aforementioned problem, the retractable stop disclosed herein has an improved lateral profile that meets the minimum clearance requirement without sacrificing its structural rigidity. In the embodiment disclosed in
The disclosed stop 20 may further include an impact plate 30 having proximal and distal portions (31, 32). The proximal portion 31 of the impact plate 30 may be pivotably connected to the upper portion 24 of the mounting bracket 21, such as through two rivets (33, 34) or the like. In an alternative embodiment (not shown), the proximal portion 31 of the impact plate 30 may also be slidably coupled to the car guide 22 (e.g. the configuration disclosed in WO 2008/002300). In any event, the impact plate 30 is pivotable from a retracted position (
As another load-bearing component, the stop 20 may include a support member 40 having upper and lower ends (41, 42). The upper end 41 of the support member 40 is pivotably connected to the distal portion 32 of the impact plate 30, such as through two rivets (43, 44) or the like. Unlike the prior art triangular stop 10 illustrated in
Finally, the disclosed stop 20 may further include an optional cross member 50 that interconnects the mounting bracket 21 and support member 40 for structural rigidity purposes. The cross member 50 may also assist the movement of the support member 40 between the retracted and deployed positions. As illustrated in
When the stop 20 is deployed as illustrated in
As illustrated in
One feature of the disclosed stop 20 is that the vertical orientation of the support member 40, in contrast to the oblique orientation in the prior art triangular stop 10, at least substantially reduces or eliminates the horizontal vector of the impact force caused by the counterweight when the stop 20 is deployed. As a result, the overall lateral profile of the support member 40 and the stop 20 may be reduced while maintaining the required structural rigidity. Another optional feature of the disclosed stop 20 is that the proximal portion 31 of the impact plate 30 is pivotably connected to the mounting bracket 21, which allows the impact plate 30 to be at least substantially vertical when the stop 20 is retracted, thereby reducing or even eliminating its contribution to the overall lateral profile of the stop 20. As illustrated in
In some embodiments, the stop 20 may further include an indicator (not shown) that signals the current position of the stop 20 to a service technician. The indicator may be visual (e.g. green and red lights positioned on the elevator roof to indicate the deployed and retracted positions of the stop, respectively) and/or audio (e.g. a series of beeps). Alternatively, the indicator may be electronic and include a transmitter than sends signals to a receiver that is accessible to the service technician.
For example, the receiver may be integrated into a control panel positioned on top of the elevator car. The control panel may further include at least one switch that remotely controls the operation of the stop 20, such as by remotely manipulating the actuator 62 to release the stop 20 from the retracted position to the deployed position. The control panel may also include a module that controls the movement of the elevator car running under maintenance mode. In light of this disclosure, those skilled in the art would be able to select from among known components and to arrange wire-based or wireless communications between the stop 20 and the service technician to achieve the desired control of the position of the stop 20 between the normal and maintenance operation modes of the elevator car.
In another aspect of this disclosure illustrated in
The retractable stop disclosed herein may have a wide range of industrial, commercial or household applications. The stop may be employed with new elevator installations or conveniently installed in existing elevator systems without significant modifications thereto. Moreover, the disclosed stop meets the minimum clearance standard by achieving a smaller overall lateral profile without sacrificing durability or structural rigidity.
While only certain embodiments have been set forth, alternative embodiments and various modifications will be apparent from the above descriptions to those skilled in the art. These and other alternatives are considered equivalents and within the spirit and scope of this disclosure.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2010/001056 | 4/12/2010 | WO | 00 | 9/18/2012 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2011/128718 | 10/20/2011 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5727657 | Foelix | Mar 1998 | A |
5806633 | Macuga | Sep 1998 | A |
6481534 | Malone, Jr. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6736242 | Nygren | May 2004 | B2 |
7077243 | Huber et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7249656 | Huber et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7322445 | Kocher et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7650969 | Monzon et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7832526 | Sirigu | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8136637 | Coquerelle et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8162108 | Sirigu et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
20090183955 | Gonzalez Rodil et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0957 061 | Apr 2003 | EP |
H06135685 | May 1994 | JP |
2005255294 | Sep 2005 | JP |
102004008576 | Oct 2004 | KR |
WO 2008002300 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO 2008004022 | Jan 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for application PCT/IB2010/001056, dated Dec. 30, 2010, 8 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130025975 A1 | Jan 2013 | US |