The present application claims priority on European Patent Application 01200178.0, filed on 18 Jan. 2001.
The present invention relates to retrieving a sample of formation fluid from a formation layer traversed by a cased borehole. The formation layer is a hydrocarbon-bearing formation layer or a formation layer that is expected to contain hydrocarbons.
A cased borehole is a borehole lined with a casing that has been cemented in the borehole so that the annulus between the outer surface of the casing and the inner surface of the borehole is filled with set cement. The casing is filled with liquid used to displace the cement out of the casing and into the annulus, before the cement sets. The liquid in the casing is so dense that fluids are prevented from entering into the casing.
In order to obtain a sample of the formation fluid from the formation layer, the casing wall is perforated in a predetermined interval within that formation layer. The tool used to create the perforations, is a perforating gun. This is an elongated body provided with a plurality of outwardly directed charges. The charges are arranged at different locations along the body oriented in different directions, and they can be activated electrically or mechanically. The charges are so designed that each charge on activation produces a perforation including a perforation tunnel that extends through the wall of the casing into the formation surrounding the borehole. The perforating gun can be lowered into the cased borehole by means of for example a wireline.
In order to obtain a fluid sample, the perforating gun is lowered to the predetermined depth and the charges are activated to create a plurality of perforations. The liquid present in the casing prevents formation fluid from entering into the casing.
Then a sampling tool is lowered into the cased borehole by means of for example a wireline. The sampling tool comprises a central conduit having an inlet and a discharge, a fluid sample container opening into the central conduit, and a system for discharging fluids from the central conduit and for moving fluids into the fluid sample container. The sampling tool is further provided with an upper and a lower packer arranged at either side of the inlet of the central conduit, wherein the discharge opens below the lower packer. The distance between the upper and the lower packer is greater than the height of the perforations.
The sampling tool is so positioned that the upper packer is located above the perforations and the lower packer below the perforations. Then the packers are set to seal off a sampling space between the packers into which all the perforations open.
The system for discharging fluids from the central conduit and for moving fluids into the fluid sample container includes a pump 58 (FIG. 1). The pump 58 is activated to remove the liquid from the sampling space. The time required to remove the liquid from the sampling space is substantially equal to the volume of the sampling space divided by the pump rate.
The pump is further activated and the fluid that enters into the central conduit is now moved into the sample container. Once the sample container is filled, it is sealed off and the sampling tool is retrieved from the borehole.
At surface the sample container is brought to a laboratory for further analysis. This analysis is important because it can give an answer to the question whether or not the formation fluid is a valuable hydrocarbon.
Unfortunately, the sampled fluid need not always represent the formation fluid. For example when the cement in the annulus does not completely fill the annulus, there is a channel with a low resistance to fluid flow. Thus fluids from the channel will preferentially be drawn into the sampling space.
It is an object of the present invention to overcome this drawback and to provide a method to obtain a fluid sample correctly representing the formation fluid.
To this end the method of retrieving a sample of formation fluid from a formation layer traversed by a cased borehole according to the present invention comprises the steps of:
In the specification and the claims the expression a perforation set refers to at least one perforation, wherein, when the set contains two or more perforations, these perforations have the same orientation.
The method of retrieving a sample of formation fluid from a formation layer 20 traversed by a cased borehole according to the invention will now be described in more detail.
With reference to
Then a sampling tool 40 is lowered into the cased borehole 32 to the first, lowermost, perforation set. The sampling tool 40 comprises a central conduit 44 having an inlet 50 and a discharge 52, a fluid sampling area 48, containing several fluid sample containers 70 opening into in fluid communications the central conduit, and a system, in this instance, a pump, 58 for discharging fluids from the central conduit and for moving fluids into the fluid sample containers. Furthermore the sampling tool 40 is provided with an upper 54 and a lower packer 56 arranged at either side of the inlet 50 of the central conduit 44. The discharge 52 of the central conduit 44 opens above the upper packer 54 or below the lower packer 56. The location of the discharge 52 depends on the design of the tool 40, but it should be located outside the sampling space between the packers.
The sampling tool 40 can be for example by lowered by means of for example a wireline 34.
In
When the first sample is taken, the sampling tool 40 is positioned near the next higher perforation set 12. The packers 54, 56 are set so that the perforation set 22 is straddled between the packers 54,56. A sample is taken from the formation and it is stored in the next fluid sample container 70 which next fluid sample container 70 is thereafter shut-off.
The latter step is repeated until samples have been taken from at most all perforation sets. The sampling tool is retrieved from the cased borehole.
At surface the fluid sample containers are removed from the sampling tool and their contents are analysed in a laboratory to obtain the relevant information.
Suitably, the step of taking a sample from a next perforation set is repeated until samples from all perforation sets have been taken.
In an alternative embodiment of the invention, the sampling tool 40 further comprises a fluid analyzer 46 (See
For example, samples are to be taken from a sand layer having a thickness of 40 m through a cased borehole traversing the sand layer. The height of the perforation set is 0.5 m and the spacing between adjacent perforation sets is 1.5 m. Therefore the number of perforation sets is 20 (=40/(0.5+1.5)) and the angle between two adjacent perforation sets is 18° (=360°/20). The length of the packer on the sampling tool is about 0.5 m, which is smaller than the spacing of 1.5 m, and the distance between the nearest ends of the packers is 1.5 m. The sampling tool in this case must have at most 20 fluid sample containers.
Suitably, the lowermost perforation 22 is marked, and the sampling tool 40 further comprises a device 60 for detecting the marker. The marker is suitably a radioactive tracer that may be introduced into the formation be placing a chemical isotope or other low level source in a shaped charge that is sent into the formation upon perforation, and the sampling tool detector 60 is suitably a nuclear detector for detecting the radioactive tracer. Alternatively, a separate tool, such as a gamma ray detector (not shown) may be used in conjunction with the sampling tool 40.
The invention provides a simple way to ensure that at least one of the samples taken correctly represents the formation fluid.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
01200178 | Jan 2001 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCTEP02/00521 | 1/15/2002 | WO | 00 | 2/18/2003 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO0205759 | 7/25/2002 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2451520 | Teplitz | Oct 1948 | A |
4222438 | Hollingsworth et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4254832 | Patton et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4552234 | Revett | Nov 1985 | A |
4597439 | Meek | Jul 1986 | A |
4635717 | Jageler | Jan 1987 | A |
4690216 | Pritchard, Jr. | Sep 1987 | A |
4780266 | Jordan et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4856585 | White et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4879900 | Gilbert | Nov 1989 | A |
4915171 | McMahan | Apr 1990 | A |
4960171 | Parrott et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5293931 | Nichols et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5337821 | Peterson | Aug 1994 | A |
5353637 | Plumb et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5353875 | Schultz et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5392857 | Behrmann | Feb 1995 | A |
5441110 | Scott, III | Aug 1995 | A |
5799733 | Ringgenberg et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
6006834 | Skinner | Dec 1999 | A |
6014933 | Umphries et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6431278 | Guinot et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6640908 | Jones et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
20020100585 | Spiers et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 697 502 | Feb 1996 | EP |
2 742 795 | Jun 1997 | FR |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030183422 A1 | Oct 2003 | US |