Extensive research by structural engineers has shown that the flange-welded-web-bolted steel beam-to-column connection design methodology that is widely used in the construction of steel moment frames is flawed and should not be used in the design of moment frames that are subject to seismic or large wind loads. This connection, shown in
Embodiments of the present invention relate to systems and methods for creating beam connections that provide improvements over and, where necessary, repair of pre-Northridge connections by eliminating the shear in the beam flanges, as well as the large stress and strain concentrations in the beam flanges. Specifically, embodiments of the invention provide techniques for creating beam connections that utilize particular arrangements of beam web slots, beam flange reinforcing fins, and beam web welds to achieve these benefits. Using beam web slots and beam web welds as presented herein for existing pre-Northridge connections eliminates the shear in the beam flanges and eliminates the large stress and strain concentrations in the beam flanges. Embodiments of the invention provide methods for retrofitting existing pre-Northridge connections to utilize beam web slots and beam web welds, and beam flange reinforcing fins.
In one embodiment, a slotted web beam connection is provided. The connection may include a column having a column flange, as well as a beam. The beam may include a first beam flange and a second beam flange. Each of the first beam flange and the second beam flange may be welded to the column flange. The beam may also include a beam web extending between the first beam flange and the second beam flange. The beam web may be welded to the column flange. The beam web may define one or more stress relief holes and one or more weld access holes. The beam web may further define a slot extending between and joining the one or more stress relief holes and a respective one of the one or more weld access holes. The connection may also include an upper backup bar that is welded to the column flange.
In another embodiment, a method of producing a slotted web beam connection is provided. The method may include welding a web of a beam to a flange of a column, welding a shear plate to the web of the beam such that an edge of the shear plate abuts the flange of the column and is welded to the column flange, and drilling stress relief holes into the web of the beam. The method may also include cutting slots into the web of the beam and welding a top backup bar to the flange of the column.
In another embodiment, a method of retrofitting a pre-Northridge steel beam-to-column connection is provided. The method may include welding a web of a beam to a flange of a column, drilling stress relief holes into the web of the beam, and cutting slots into the web of the beam. The method may also include welding a top backup bar to the flange of the column, removing a bottom backup bar from the flange of the column, and back gouging the beam flange weld to the column at a position of the removed backup bar. The method may further include welding a bottom flange of the beam to the flange of the column. The method may also include replacing or repairing existing beam-to-column welds. The method may also include coupling one or more reinforcing fins to the beam and column flanges.
A further understanding of the nature and advantages of various embodiments may be realized by reference to the following figures.
The ensuing description provides exemplary embodiments only, and is not intended to limit the scope, applicability or configuration of the disclosure. Rather, the ensuing description of the embodiments will provide those skilled in the art with an enabling description for implementing multiple embodiments. It will be understood that various changes may be made in the function and arrangement of elements without departing from the spirit and scope of this disclosure.
As described above, the pre-Northridge connection that is commonly used in the construction of steel moment frames is flawed in that it relies upon an incorrect assumption that at the connection, the shear in the beam is totally resisted by the beam web and the moment in the beam is totally resisted by the beam flanges. Embodiments of the invention provide a slotted web retrofit design methodology that uses beam web slots to eliminate or reduce the beam flange moments and shears. This results in a near uniform stress and strain distribution in the beam flanges and in the beam-to-column welds. A beam web groove weldment is added to a column flange and uses a shear plate as a backing. The shear plate is secured to a beam web with an edge of the shear plate abutting the column flange. Such an arrangement provides both moment and shear resistance by the beam web.
Analytical studies have shown that the shear distribution at the support of cantilever beams differs drastically from that predicted by classical Bernoulli-Euler beam theory that lead to the popular design concept wherein “the flanges carry the moment and the web carries the shear.” It was shown that in the case of a rigid support (beam web and flanges welded to a rigid column flange), the entire beam shear is resisted by the flanges. For typical “Flange-Welded, Web-Bolted” connection designs however, 50% or more of the shear is resisted by the beam flanges. Following the 1994 Northridge, Calif. earthquake, where numerous of these connections in steel moment frame buildings fractured, this connection is now called the pre-Northridge connection. It is this large component of the beam flange shear in combination with the beam flange moment that causes severe stress and strain gradients across and through the beam flanges of these connections. Research has shown the strain demands on the beam flanges and weld material is 8 times the yield strain for an unreinforced pre-Northridge connection and 5 times the yield strain for a Reduced Beam Section connection.
A pre-Northridge connection is shown in
One embodiment of a slotted web connection in accordance with the present invention is shown in
An upper backup bar 220 is welded to the column flange 206, such as by using a fillet weld between a bottom of the backup bar 220 and the column flange 206. In retrofit applications, an existing lower backup bar (not shown) is removed, and any existing weld is back gouged and replaced using a fillet weld 222, such as a 5/16 inch fillet weld. By separating the beam flanges 208 from the beam web 212 with slots 216 and using fillet weld 222 to secure the beam web 212 to the column flange 206, the force distributions are changed from those in the pre-Northridge connection. Specifically, (1) the large component of the beam shear in the flanges 208, 224 is eliminated, (2) the large stress and strain gradients across and though the beam flanges 208, 224 are eliminated, and (3) the beam web connection to the column 202 and shear plate 210 resists substantially all of the beam shear.
ATC-24 protocol tests have been made using the single-cantilever type and bare steel specimens as shown in test results in Table 1 below.
This pseudo-static test with the loading protocol developed by in the FEMA/SAC program has been adopted in the AISC Seismic Provisions (AISC, 2016a). These tests, along with the finite element analysis of the slotted web connection, show that the yielding region is concentrated in the separated portion of the beam flanges and in the beam web at the end of the shear plate. Peak strengths of the test specimens are usually achieved at an interstory drift angle of approximately 0.03 and 0.04 radian. Reduction in strength, if any, is gradual and due to the out-of-plane buckling of both the beam flanges and web. Buckling of the flanges and web occurs concurrently but independently, which eliminates the lateral torsional mode of buckling. Review of the test data indicates that the slotted web connection, when designed and constructed in accordance with the limits and procedures presented herein, have developed interstory drift angles of 0.04 radian and 0.03 radian of plastic rotation or more under cyclic loading on a consistent basis. Ultimate failure typically occurs at drift angles of 0.05 to 0.07 radian by low cycle fatigue fracture of the flange near the end of the slot or partial fracture of the beam web/shear plate weldment to the column flange.
At block 408, stress relief holes may be drilled in the beam web. At block 410, slots may be cut into the beam web, such as by using a thermal cutting device. The top backup bar may be welded to the column flange, such as by using a fillet weld, as shown in block 412. In some retrofit applications, an existing bottom flange backup bar may be removed as shown in block 414. Upon removing the existing backup bar, any existing weld may be back gouged and replaced using a fillet weld, such as a 5/16 inch fillet weld as shown in block 416.
Each flange of the beam may be welded to the column flange, such as by using groove welds formed between the respective flanges. In retrofit applications in which a pre-Northridge connection is being modified, the beam flanges will already be welded to the column flange. In new connections, process 400 may include welding the beam flanges to the column flange.
It should be noted that the systems and devices discussed above are intended merely to be examples. It must be stressed that various embodiments may omit, substitute, or add various procedures or components as appropriate. Also, features described with respect to certain embodiments may be combined in various other embodiments. Different aspects and elements of the embodiments may be combined in a similar manner. Also, it should be emphasized that technology evolves and, thus, many of the elements are examples and should not be interpreted to limit the scope of the invention.
Specific details are given in the description to provide a thorough understanding of the embodiments. However, it will be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art that the embodiments may be practiced without these specific details. For example, well-known structures and techniques have been shown without unnecessary detail in order to avoid obscuring the embodiments. This description provides example embodiments only, and is not intended to limit the scope, applicability, or configuration of the invention. Rather, the preceding description of the embodiments will provide those skilled in the art with an enabling description for implementing embodiments of the invention. Various changes may be made in the function and arrangement of elements without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
The methods, systems, devices, graphs, and tables discussed above are examples. Various configurations may omit, substitute, or add various procedures or components as appropriate. For instance, in alternative configurations, the methods may be performed in an order different from that described, and/or various stages may be added, omitted, and/or combined. Also, features described with respect to certain configurations may be combined in various other configurations. Different aspects and elements of the configurations may be combined in a similar manner. Also, technology evolves and, thus, many of the elements are examples and do not limit the scope of the disclosure or claims. Additionally, the techniques discussed herein may provide differing results with different types of context awareness classifiers.
Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly or conventionally understood. As used herein, the articles “a” and “an” refer to one or to more than one (i.e., to at least one) of the grammatical object of the article. By way of example, “an element” means one element or more than one element. “About” and/or “approximately” as used herein when referring to a measurable value such as an amount, a temporal duration, and the like, encompasses variations of ±20% or ±10%, ±5%, or +0.1% from the specified value, as such variations are appropriate to in the context of the systems, devices, circuits, methods, and other implementations described herein. “Substantially” as used herein when referring to a measurable value such as an amount, a temporal duration, a physical attribute (such as frequency), and the like, also encompasses variations of ±20% or ±10%, ±5%, or +0.1% from the specified value, as such variations are appropriate to in the context of the systems, devices, circuits, methods, and other implementations described herein. As used herein, including in the claims, “and” as used in a list of items prefaced by “at least one of” or “one or more of” indicates that any combination of the listed items may be used. For example, a list of “at least one of A, B, and C” includes any of the combinations A or B or C or AB or AC or BC and/or ABC (i.e., A and B and C). Furthermore, to the extent more than one occurrence or use of the items A, B, or C is possible, multiple uses of A, B, and/or C may form part of the contemplated combinations. For example, a list of “at least one of A, B, and C” may also include AA, AAB, AAA, BB, etc.
Having described several embodiments, it will be recognized by those of skill in the art that various modifications, alternative constructions, and equivalents may be used without departing from the spirit of the invention. For example, the above elements may merely be a component of a larger system, wherein other rules may take precedence over or otherwise modify the application of the invention. Also, a number of steps may be undertaken before, during, or after the above elements are considered. Accordingly, the above description should not be taken as limiting the scope of the invention.
Also, the words “comprise”, “comprising”, “contains”, “containing”, “include”, “including”, and “includes”, when used in this specification and in the following claims, are intended to specify the presence of stated features, integers, components, or steps, but they do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, components, steps, acts, or groups.
This application is continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/397,868, entitled “RETROFIT DESIGNS FOR STEEL BEAM-TO-COLUMN CONNECTIONS”, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/663,881, entitled “RETROFIT DESIGNS FOR STEEL BEAM-TO-COLUMN CONNECTIONS”, filed on Apr. 27, 2018, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 62,727,797, entitled “RETROFIT DESIGNS FOR STEEL BEAM-TO-COLUMN CONNECTIONS”, filed on Sep. 6, 2018, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62663881 | Apr 2018 | US | |
62727797 | Sep 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16397868 | Apr 2019 | US |
Child | 16665659 | US |