The present invention is directed to reusable envelope structures and methods of use thereof.
Many types of envelope structures are, in general, well known. A common disadvantage of many envelope structures is that they can only be used once and are then usually discarded afterwards, thereby creating unnecessary waste after a single use. Some envelopes fail to be used even once before being discarded. Moreover, it is common for an otherwise unused envelope structure to be discarded because it has been preaddressed for a particular recipient. For example, certain envelope structures are frequently utilized for mailing invoices and the like. A second envelope, which is often preaddressed and sometimes provided with postage, is usually included with the invoice for returning the invoice to the sender. In the case where the invoice is not returned, such as where a payment or correspondence is made electronically, the second preaddressed envelope is usually discarded. This practice, although not uncommon, is unfortunately wasteful, especially in large volumes. Thus, easily reusable envelope structures are desirable.
Envelopes have been developed that utilize a single structure to form primary and return envelopes such as are described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,194,631 to Rangan and U.S. Pat. No. 4,715,531 to Stewart et al. These envelopes are directed to small envelopes such as conventional No. 10 envelopes. Envelopes of this type are convertible from a primary to a return envelope. That is, tearing and folding steps are used to convert a received envelope to an envelope that can be returned to the sender or forwarded to another party. Typically, these structures are quite complex and somewhat costly to produce. Thus, reusable envelopes in general have been limited to small envelopes and large established markets for their use.
Additionally, known reusable envelope structures can be somewhat difficult to utilize because of a requirement for performing complex operations in order to manipulate the envelope. That is, a cumbersome sequence of steps must be followed in order to convert the envelope. Moreover, many envelopes of this type commonly include tags, glue patches, or loose edges being left on the envelope, which can interfere with machine remittance equipment, especially on the return trip. As such, easy to use and cost effective reusable envelope structures are desirable.
The POSTNET (POSTal Numeric Encoding Technique) barcode is preferably used to help ensure accurate delivery of a reusable envelope on its first use. Preferably, the POSTNET barcode is marked on the contents or correspondence to be sent. The correspondence is preferably placed in a reusable envelope, so that the POSTNET barcode is viewable through a window or the like of the envelope such as an address window. In this manner, the POSTNET barcode can help to ensure that the contents are accurately delivered to the correct address.
The POSTNET barcode was developed by the Postal Service to encode ZIP Code information on letter mail for rapid and reliable sorting by a barcode sorter (BCS). The POSTNET barcode can represent a five-digit ZIP code (32 bars), nine-digit ZIP+4 code (52 bars), or an eleven-digit delivery point code (62 bars). The delivery point (formed by the last 10 bars) represents two additional digits normally the last two digits of the street address, post office box, rural route, or highway contract route number.
The delivery point barcode was developed by the Postal Service to identify each of the 134 million delivery points in the United States. The POSTNET delivery point barcode system significantly reduces the time it takes the post office to sort letter mail before delivery.
The post office uses two methods of operations to process mail: manual and automated. Manual requires the address be read and sorted manually while automated requires the mail be fed into and removed from a machine that both reads and sorts. There are two types of automated systems: multiline optical character readers (MLOCR) and barcode sorters (BCS). A MLOCR scans the address block on each letter size mailpiece to determine the ZIP+4 code and the delivery point information. The MLOCR then converts this information to a POSTNET barcode. The MLOCR then prints the barcode on the envelope and performs the initial sorting.
A barcode sorter (BCS) reads POSTNET barcodes on letter-size pieces and sorts the mail accordingly. This machine does not read addresses, so it will missort a piece if an incorrect barcode is present. If a POSTNET barcode was not part of the address block showing through the window, the MLOCR would read the address and print a POSTNET barcode on the envelope in the barcode clear zone located at the bottom right of the envelope.
Having the POSTNET barcode provided on the envelope (such as by printing, for example) is generally not preferred on a reusable envelope. If there is no barcode on the envelope when it arrives at the post office, the letter will go through the MLOCR and print a POSTNET barcode for delivery on the envelope so the BCS can sort the mail. The barcode will typically be printed on the lower right side of the envelope in the barcode clear zone. If the barcode is printed on the reusable envelope when a reusable envelope is sent the second time with a new address, the mailpiece will skip the MLOCR and go directly to the original BCS. Although there is a new address, the BCS will only read the old barcode that was printed on the envelope. In this situation the POSTNET barcode printed on the envelope corresponds to the address of the original mailing, not the address of the second mailing. Thus, the BCS will read the original barcode from the original address and sort the mail to go to the original location not to the new address because the POSTNET barcode printed on the envelope was created using the original address and has priority over the new address.
As an example, if a mailing and billing entity such as a utility company did not have a POSTNET barcode with the customer's address on the statement and viewable through a window of the envelope, the address would be read by the MLOCR and a POSTNET barcode would be printed on the envelop to enable the BCS to sort the mail. This would be acceptable for the delivery but if the same envelope were used to send payment back to the utility company with the company's address now in the window (for example the statement from the utility company could be put back in the envelope so the utility company's address was visible through a window), the company's address would not be read and assigned a POSTNET barcode, only the barcode which was printed on the envelope corresponding to the customer's address would be read. Having the POSTNET appear with the address block of the contents of the envelope can eliminate having the mailpiece to go through the MLOCR, which would print a POSTNET barcode on the envelope thus preventing the envelope from being effectively reused. Having a POSTNET barcode that is preprinted for the address in the address block will be read by the BCS then sorted for the correct address location. The POSTNET barcode in the address block will therefore be the correct barcode for that address. Therefore, having the POSTNET barcode preprinted with the address can help guarantee correct delivery when the envelope is resent. Having the POSTNET barcode in the address block and not printed on the envelope can eliminate the need to print a POSTNET barcode on the envelope, thereby preventing the mail being sorted to the wrong location. With a POSTNET barcode with the address, the whole MLOCR process can be skipped and the mailpiece can go directly to the BCS for sorting. This can save time and labor costs for the post office. This savings can then be passed on in the form of rate discounts and faster delivery of the mail.
The present invention provides reusable envelope structures and methods of use thereof. In preferred aspects, the present invention provides novel envelope structures in which a single envelope structure can provide multiple uses. With a POSTNET barcode in the address block of the contents of the envelope, no barcode needs to be printed on the envelope itself. For the purpose of using the reusable envelope of invention, having a barcode printed on the envelope could prevent the post office from delivering the mail back to the sender (such as the utility company described above) because the barcode could contain the customers ZIP+4 code and would be sorted to go back to the customer instead of to the utility company, for example. Additional benefits of providing a barcode in the address block that can show through a window before it arrives at the Post Office allows for automation-compatible rate discounts. Thus a POSTNET barcode in the address block of the contents may be desirable by both the post office and most businesses that send letter-size mail.
In an aspect of the present invention a reusable envelope is provided. The reusable envelope preferably comprises a reusable envelope body and a reusable closure flap. The reusable sealing flap preferably comprises a first portion proximal to the reusable envelope body, a second portion extending from the first portion, a third portion extending from the second portion, at least one bridge portion partially connecting the second and third portions, and a tear strip. The first portion is proximal to the reusable envelope body and extends along the reusable envelope body for a length. The first portion comprises a first adhesive region and is at least partially defined by a fold line connecting the reusable closure flap to the reusable envelope body and a first line of weakness spaced apart from the fold line. The second portion extends from the first portion and is distal from the reusable envelope body and preferably extends along the length of the first portion. The second portion is at least partially defined by the first line of weakness and a second line of weakness spaced apart from the first line of weakness wherein the second line of weakness extends partially across the reusable closure flap. The third portion extends from the second portion and is distal from the reusable envelope body and preferably extends along a length of the second portion that is less than the length of the second portion. The third portion comprising a second adhesive region and is at least partially defined by the second line of weakness and a distal edge of the reusable sealing flap. The tear strip is preferably defined at least partially by the first and second lines of weakness. The reusable envelope body preferably comprises a front panel, rear panel, top edge, bottom edge, right edge, and left edge. In accordance with the present invention, the reusable closure flap preferably extends from the bottom edge of the reusable envelope body.
In another aspect of the present invention, a method for reusing an envelope is provided. The method comprises the steps of providing an envelope such as the reusable envelope described above, attaching the third portion of the reusable sealing flap to the reusable envelope body to close the reusable envelope a first time, removing the tear strip, separating the second portion of the reusable sealing flap from the third portion of the reusable sealing flap by tearing the at least one bridge portion, and attaching the first portion of the reusable sealing flap to the reusable envelope body to close the reusable envelope a second time. The method may also comprise the step of attaching the first portion of the reusable sealing flap to the reusable envelope body to close the reusable envelope a second time comprising folding the first portion of the reusable sealing flap along the fold line and attaching the first portion of the reusable sealing flap to the rear panel of the reusable envelope body.
In another aspect of the present invention, a reusable envelope is provided. The reusable envelope preferably comprises a reusable envelope body and a reusable sealing flap, the reusable sealing flap comprises a first portion proximal to the reusable envelope body, a second portion extending from the first portion, a third portion, and at least one bridge portion partially connecting the second and third portions of the reusable sealing flap. The first portion is proximal to the reusable envelope body and extends along the reusable envelope body for a length. The first portion comprises a first adhesive region and is at least partially defined by a fold line connecting the reusable closure flap to the reusable envelope body and a first line of weakness spaced apart from the fold line. The second portion extends from the first portion and is distal from the reusable envelope body and preferably extends along the length of the first portion. The second portion is preferably at least partially defined by the first line of weakness and a tear strip spaced apart from the first line of weakness wherein the tear strip extends partially across the reusable closure flap. The third portion extends from the tear strip and is distal from the reusable envelope body and extends along a length of the tear strip that is less than the length of the first portion. The third portion comprises a second adhesive region and is preferably at least partially defined by the tear strip and a distal edge of the reusable closure flap. The reusable envelope body preferably comprises a front panel, rear panel, top edge, bottom edge, right edge, and left edge. In accordance with the present invention, the reusable closure flap preferably extends from the bottom edge of the reusable envelope body.
In another aspect of the present invention a method is provided for preventing a reusable envelope mailed a first time by a first sender to a second sender from looping back to the second sender when the reusable envelop is mailed a second time by the second sender. The method comprises the steps of receiving a reusable envelope having a reusable closure flap and that has been mailed a first time by the first sender to a first destination address, and applying a mark such as a barcode, for example, that comprises information related to the first destination address on a removable portion of the reusable closure flap that is removed when the reusable envelope is opened a first time thereby also removing the mark prior to reusing the envelope a second time.
In another aspect of the present invention a method is provided for preventing a reusable envelope mailed a first time by a first sender to a second sender from looping back to the second sender when the reusable envelope is mailed a second time by the second sender. The method comprises the steps of receiving a reusable envelope having a reusable envelope body and a reusable closure flap and that has been mailed a first time by the first sender to a first destination address, and applying a mark such as a barcode, for example, that comprises information related to the first destination address at a first position on a portion of the reusable envelope that become a closure flap after the reusable envelope is opened a first time and that can be folded over the reusable envelope body to close the reusable envelope when the reusable envelope is used a second time thereby positioning the mark at second position on a portion of the reusable envelope that is different from the first position.
It is believed that any envelope, mailing device, or mailing container can benefit from the application of the inventive concept of the present invention. As a result, the choice of the type of envelope in which to apply the concept is not particularly limited. It is believed, however, that certain aspects of the inventive concept will prove particularly advantageous to send and return mail envelopes. Accordingly, envelopes can easily be manufactured to be reused. Moreover, this helps to reduce landfill waste and save natural resources.
These and other features and advantages of the present invention will be apparent in the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference numerals are used to identify the same or similar parts in the several views.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this application, illustrate several aspects of the invention and together with the description of the embodiments serve to explain the principles of the invention. A brief description of the drawings is as follows:
An exemplary reusable envelope 10 and methods of using such envelope in accordance with the present invention are shown in
The end 46 of the tear off strip 44 preferably comprises a die cut preferably extending the width of the tear strip 44 for grasping the tear strip 44 and pulling to remove the tear strip 44. Removing the tear strip 44 partially opens the envelope 10 except for the bridge portion 50 that preferably extends from the beginning of the die cut to an edge 27 of the flap 30. In accordance with the present invention, the bridge portion 50 preferably functions as a safety device to keep the envelope 10 from accidentally tearing along the perforations while in the inserting process, for example, whereby letters or statements are mechanically inserted into the envelope 10 and sealed for mailing. As shown, the bridge portion 50 is preferably located at the intersection of the large portion of the closure flap 30 and the small portion of the closure flap 30 near the die cut. The scallop shape of the closure flap 30 near the die cut and bridge portion 50 facilitates the narrow bridge portion 50 which is designed to be strong enough to permit secure machine inserting and sealing, but small enough for a customer to easily break the bridge portion 50 when opening the envelope 10. The bridge portion also functions as a safety mechanism for the rough and tumble journey an envelope makes in the delivery carrier's bag. The illustrated envelope 10 includes one bridge portion, but plural bridge portions can be used. For example, envelope 10 could include a second bridge portion opposite the bridge portion 50 on the opposite side of closure flap 30. Such bridges or non-perforated regions also help to prevent premature tearing of the closure flap 30 from the body of the envelope 10 during inserting and delivery.
The barcode 52 is typically only provided on envelopes when the address is not clearly readable or the envelopes are out of their presorted order or do not have a POSTNET barcode address in the window. The barcode 52, if used, needs to be removed so the envelope will not loop back to the customer or first user of the envelope when mailed a second time. The barcode 52 is an internal Post Office step to keep mail from being delayed for any reason. Because envelopes in accordance with the present invention can be used by statement mailers, the barcode 52, when present, must be obscured or removed to prevent looping during a second use of the envelope.
In accordance with the present invention, removing the tear strip 44 opens the envelope 10 along perforation 40 that becomes the edge of a new closure flap 45, visible in
In use, tear strip 74 is removed and bridge portion 76 is severed to open the envelope 64 after being closed a first time with adhesive region 70. As shown, tear strip 74 is partially defined by perforations but any tear strip, single line of weakness, plural lines of weakness, or other opening technique may be used. The bridge portion 76 is preferred by not required. Bridge portions at both sides of the closure flap 68 may be used. After opening a first time, portion 78 of closure flap 68 is also removed by line of weakness 80, such as a perforation or the like. After portion 78 is removed the envelope 64 can be closed for a second use by folding closure flap along fold line 67.
Design advantages provided by reusable envelope in accordance with the present invention include no extra folds or flaps, ease of use and reuse, conventional and familiar ways to open, remove contents, reinsert reply, reseal, apply postage and mail. Reusable envelopes in accordance with the present invention are capable of eliminating looping issues by removing, or obscuring any barcodes provided on the envelope front or back without adding additional flaps or folds to accomplish the task. If a barcode is applied on the front lower right corner of the envelope then when the envelope is resealed that portion of the face that the barcode is positioned on is the back lower right corner on the return trip. This removes this barcode from the read zone (⅝″×4″ from the lower right edge of the envelope on face) thus making it non readable. Also, having a perforation along the fold edge of the closure flap of an envelope helps to eliminate the risk of someone opening the envelope with a letter opener of any kind and ruining the reuse capabilities.
Reusable envelope structures, sealing flap structures, and methods of using such reusable envelopes are disclosed in copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/064,791 to DeLaVergne filed on Feb. 24, 2005, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference for all purposes. In particular, sealing flap structures and methods of use described in the Ser. No. 11/064,791 application can be used with the reusable envelopes of the present invention.
The present invention has now been described with reference to several embodiments thereof. The entire disclosure of any patent or patent application identified herein is hereby incorporated by reference. The foregoing detailed description and examples have been given for clarity of understanding only. No unnecessary limitations are to be understood therefrom. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that many changes can be made in the embodiments described without departing from the scope of the invention. Thus, the scope of the present invention should not be limited to the structures described herein, but only by the structures described by the language of the claims and the equivalents of those structures.
The present application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/838,733, filed Aug. 18, 2006, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1438122 | McCoy | Dec 1922 | A |
1953192 | Rossiter | Apr 1934 | A |
1957704 | Drachman | May 1934 | A |
1960054 | Johnson | May 1934 | A |
1988908 | MacKinnon | Jan 1935 | A |
2129705 | Reineman | Sep 1938 | A |
2201538 | Holden | May 1940 | A |
2310371 | Lines et al. | Feb 1943 | A |
2340700 | Sawdon | Feb 1944 | A |
2350100 | Deutschmeister et al. | May 1944 | A |
2363957 | Goff | Nov 1944 | A |
2400406 | Godoy | May 1946 | A |
2417982 | Histed | Mar 1947 | A |
2835512 | Whitman | May 1958 | A |
2928583 | Law | Mar 1960 | A |
2941711 | Biek | Jun 1960 | A |
2954154 | Mooney | Sep 1960 | A |
3062431 | Rabenold | Nov 1962 | A |
3086695 | Lillibridge | Apr 1963 | A |
3111257 | Peach | Nov 1963 | A |
3113716 | Howard | Dec 1963 | A |
3152751 | Hiersteiner | Oct 1964 | A |
3184150 | Hubbard | May 1965 | A |
3227360 | Krueger | Jan 1966 | A |
3259304 | Tichnor | Jul 1966 | A |
3261623 | Kiedrowski | Jul 1966 | A |
3276669 | Vilutis | Oct 1966 | A |
3330581 | Ivarsson-Wallerstrom | Jul 1967 | A |
3374940 | Allison | Mar 1968 | A |
3380648 | De Lyra | Apr 1968 | A |
3411699 | Pine et al. | Nov 1968 | A |
3426961 | Allison | Feb 1969 | A |
3498528 | Klein | Mar 1970 | A |
3525469 | Sawdon | Aug 1970 | A |
3531046 | Carrigan | Sep 1970 | A |
3537637 | Hiersteiner | Nov 1970 | A |
3545669 | Kinkade et al. | Dec 1970 | A |
3652007 | MacDougall | Mar 1972 | A |
3693869 | Eaves, Jr. | Sep 1972 | A |
3718277 | Volkert | Feb 1973 | A |
3747837 | Wilson | Jul 1973 | A |
3802618 | Wiessner | Apr 1974 | A |
3822492 | Crawley | Jul 1974 | A |
3874582 | Wang | Apr 1975 | A |
3910410 | Shaw | Oct 1975 | A |
3941309 | Gendron | Mar 1976 | A |
3979051 | Close | Sep 1976 | A |
3982689 | Retrum | Sep 1976 | A |
4157759 | Dicker | Jun 1979 | A |
4159129 | Lockhart | Jun 1979 | A |
4180168 | Hiersteiner | Dec 1979 | A |
4190161 | Gendron | Feb 1980 | A |
4190162 | Buescher | Feb 1980 | A |
4194631 | Rangan | Mar 1980 | A |
4245775 | Conn | Jan 1981 | A |
4288028 | Diaz | Sep 1981 | A |
4308987 | Solomon | Jan 1982 | A |
4332346 | Kronman | Jun 1982 | A |
4354631 | Stevenson | Oct 1982 | A |
4379573 | Lomeli et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
4382539 | Kronman | May 1983 | A |
4403696 | Newell | Sep 1983 | A |
4436202 | Berkley | Mar 1984 | A |
4445635 | Barr | May 1984 | A |
4487360 | Fisher et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4538833 | Trikilis | Sep 1985 | A |
4549658 | Sfikas | Oct 1985 | A |
4565317 | Kranz | Jan 1986 | A |
4602736 | Barr | Jul 1986 | A |
4613157 | Drabish | Sep 1986 | A |
4620630 | Moss | Nov 1986 | A |
4640030 | Wood et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4651920 | Stenner | Mar 1987 | A |
4653639 | Traynor | Mar 1987 | A |
4688715 | Barr | Aug 1987 | A |
4690322 | Burns | Sep 1987 | A |
4715531 | Stewart et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4775095 | Emmott | Oct 1988 | A |
4778100 | McGuire et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4778101 | Paquin | Oct 1988 | A |
4821439 | Wilck | Apr 1989 | A |
4896823 | Taylor | Jan 1990 | A |
4899926 | Spaulding | Feb 1990 | A |
4917287 | Watson | Apr 1990 | A |
4927072 | Jenkins et al. | May 1990 | A |
4934536 | Mills | Jun 1990 | A |
4944449 | Schmidt | Jul 1990 | A |
4945218 | Talbott | Jul 1990 | A |
4960237 | Bendel | Oct 1990 | A |
4981251 | Jenkins et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4993624 | Schlich | Feb 1991 | A |
5024374 | Ashby | Jun 1991 | A |
5025980 | Blackman | Jun 1991 | A |
5039000 | Ashby | Aug 1991 | A |
5040720 | Pennock | Aug 1991 | A |
5052613 | Lin | Oct 1991 | A |
5071167 | O'Brien | Dec 1991 | A |
5071399 | Ashby | Dec 1991 | A |
5104036 | Rutkowski et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5110043 | Ashby | May 1992 | A |
5118030 | McNamara et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5118031 | Tighe | Jun 1992 | A |
5125562 | Bendel | Jun 1992 | A |
5163612 | Ashby | Nov 1992 | A |
5197663 | Stude | Mar 1993 | A |
5201464 | File | Apr 1993 | A |
5209698 | Dolan | May 1993 | A |
5213258 | Kim | May 1993 | A |
5224647 | Yanow | Jul 1993 | A |
5232150 | Solomons | Aug 1993 | A |
5248032 | Sheu et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5253803 | Chess | Oct 1993 | A |
5271553 | Kim | Dec 1993 | A |
5277362 | Wilson | Jan 1994 | A |
5282568 | File | Feb 1994 | A |
5292062 | Chess | Mar 1994 | A |
5299979 | Ballard | Apr 1994 | A |
5318222 | Bartlett | Jun 1994 | A |
5324927 | Williams | Jun 1994 | A |
5415341 | Diamond | May 1995 | A |
5487826 | Back et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5510608 | Williams | Apr 1996 | A |
5514863 | Williams | May 1996 | A |
5516040 | Lin | May 1996 | A |
5626286 | Petkovsek | May 1997 | A |
5626370 | Petkovsek | May 1997 | A |
5690220 | Swan | Nov 1997 | A |
5697496 | Bauer | Dec 1997 | A |
5722538 | Neely et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5738274 | Stude | Apr 1998 | A |
5752647 | Schubert et al. | May 1998 | A |
5887904 | Petkovsek | Mar 1999 | A |
5901843 | Gambardella et al. | May 1999 | A |
5901844 | Gambardella et al. | May 1999 | A |
5909805 | Neely | Jun 1999 | A |
5967403 | Kranz | Oct 1999 | A |
6059316 | Whittington | May 2000 | A |
6129269 | Tait | Oct 2000 | A |
6179202 | Alexander et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6220504 | Flynn et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223977 | Hill | May 2001 | B1 |
6254138 | Rawlings et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6361077 | Petkovsek | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6435404 | Feick | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6612484 | Rawlings et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6725587 | Collins | Apr 2004 | B2 |
D510383 | Potter et al. | Oct 2005 | S |
6966484 | Calonje et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6983875 | Emmott | Jan 2006 | B2 |
D536375 | Potter et al. | Feb 2007 | S |
7178713 | Stude | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7201305 | Correa | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7469816 | Rosenkranz et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7549571 | DeLaVergne | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7726548 | DeLaVergne | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7775420 | Emmott | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7815099 | DeLaVergne | Oct 2010 | B2 |
20020008135 | Kim | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020023948 | Gillespie, IV | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020030093 | Kim | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020130169 | Purcell | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030015581 | Purcell | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040050918 | DeLaVergne | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050045707 | Stude | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050184140 | DeLa Vergne | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060113367 | Emmott | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060208053 | Emmott | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060219769 | DeLaVergne | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060266808 | DeLaVergne | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20090302099 | DeLa Vergne | Dec 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11893562 | Aug 2007 | US |
Child | 13488928 | US |