Embodiments of the present invention relate to computer software, and more particularly relate to techniques for facilitating the sharing of metadata by a plurality of software applications.
In recent years, an increasing number of software applications are being built using a metadata-driven approach. These applications (referred to herein as metadata-driven applications) are structured such that aspects of their content, behavior, and/or appearance are specified via metadata rather than program code. For example, Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) applications typically rely on data and services that are defined using Extensible Markup Language (XML) based metadata (e.g., Web Services Description Language (WSDL) documents, XML Schema Definition (XSD) documents, etc.).
Large-scale software applications or application suites (such as the Oracle E-Business Suite developed by Oracle Corporation) may include a number of metadata-driven applications or application components that make use of the same metadata. For instance, the applications may use one or more common metadata documents that describe a standard user interface layout, standard data types, or the like. In these situations, the common metadata should be made available to all of the applications in some manner.
According to one approach, such common metadata can be made available to applications by simply duplicating the metadata in each application. Unfortunately, this approach is problematic for several reasons. For example, since each application must include its own, separate copy of the common metadata, problems may occur where applications are accidentally deployed with mismatched metadata versions, resulting in incorrect runtime behavior. Further, maintaining duplicate versions of metadata is inefficient and cumbersome. For example, the size of each application will be larger than necessary because of the duplicated metadata, and any modifications to the metadata will require updates to each duplicated copy.
According to another approach, the common metadata can be stored in a centralized location, and the various applications can retrieve the single, shared copy using proprietary means (i.e., means that do not leverage any standard access mechanisms such as Uniform Resource Locators (URLs)). While this method overcomes some of the difficulties related to duplicating common metadata, this method still has several shortcomings. For instance, each application will have to implement proprietary code for accessing the shared copy of the metadata, rendering the application incompatible with a large number of existing application framework components and standards (e.g., development tools, XML processors, WSDL, etc.) that are adapted to reference metadata documents as URLs.
Embodiments of the present invention address the foregoing and other such problems by providing techniques for facilitating the sharing of a metadata document by a plurality of software applications via URL protocol. In one set of embodiments, the metadata document is referenced by the plurality of software applications as a URL, the URL comprising a protocol component identifying a specialized protocol name and a path component identifying a name and namespace of the metadata document. The specialized protocol name indicates that the metadata document is a shared document stored in a shared metadata repository. When an application in the plurality of software applications needs to access the metadata document, the URL is passed to a URL resolver configured to identify the shared metadata repository based on configuration information associated with the application. The metadata document is then retrieved from the shared metadata repository. Since many existing application framework components and standards are adapted to reference metadata documents as URLs, embodiments of the present invention facilitate metadata reuse with minimal or no code changes to the applications or their underlying framework.
According to one embodiment of the present invention, a method for facilitating the sharing of a metadata document by a plurality of software applications comprises receiving, from a software application in the plurality of software applications, a URL for the metadata document, the URL including a protocol component identifying a specialized protocol name and a path component identifying a name and namespace of the metadata document. The specialized protocol name indicates that the metadata document is a shared document stored in a shared metadata repository. The shared metadata repository is then identified based on configuration information associated with the software application and (optionally) the namespace of metadata document.
In one set of embodiments, the metadata document is subsequently retrieved from the shared metadata repository. In another set of embodiments, a domain name for the shared metadata repository is determined, and the URL is transformed into a HyperText Transfer Protocol (HTTP) URL based on the domain name. The HTTP URL enables applications to retrieve the metadata document using standard HTTP protocol.
In various embodiments, the steps of receiving the URL and identifying the shared metadata repository are performed by a URL resolver configured to interoperate with a URL technology component. The URL technology component is a standard application framework component adapted to process URLs on behalf of the plurality of software applications. In one embodiment, the software applications are J2EE applications, the URL technology component is a standard Java URL class, and the URL resolver is a custom Java class that extends the standard Java URL class.
In one set of embodiments, the steps of receiving the URL and identifying the shared metadata repository are performed while the software application is running in a deployed environment. In these embodiments, the shared metadata repository may be a database repository. In another set of embodiments, the steps of receiving the URL and identifying the shared metadata repository may be performed while the software application is running in a development environment. In these embodiments, the configuration information may be associated with the development environment rather than the software application. Further, the shared metadata repository may be a file-based repository.
In some embodiments, the configuration information may include version information indicating a specific version of the metadata document used by the software application. For example, each application in the plurality of software applications may use a different version of the metadata document. In these embodiments, retrieving the metadata document comprises retrieving the specific version. In further embodiments, the configuration information may include customization information indicating a specific customized variant of the metadata document used by the software application. For example, each application in the plurality of software applications may use a different customization for the metadata document. In these embodiments, retrieving the metadata document comprises retrieving the specific customized variant. The concept of metadata customizations is discussed in greater detail in U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 12/029,600, 12/029,605, 12/029,609, 12/029,615, and 12/029,724, assigned to Oracle Corporation, which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties for all purposes.
According to another embodiment of the present invention, a system for facilitating the sharing of a metadata document by a plurality of software applications is provided. The system comprises a standard URL technology component adapted to process URLs on behalf of the plurality of software applications, and a custom URL resolver in communication with the URL technology component. In various embodiments, the custom URL resolver is configured to receive, from a software application in the plurality of software applications via the URL technology component, a URL for the metadata document, the URL including a protocol component identifying a specialized protocol name and a path component identifying a name and namespace of the metadata document. The specialized protocol name indicates that the metadata document is a shared metadata document stored in a shared metadata repository. The custom URL resolver is further configured to identify the shared metadata repository based on configuration information associated with the software application and (optionally) the namespace of the metadata document. In various embodiments, the metadata document may then be retrieved from the shared metadata repository. Alternatively, a domain name for the shared metadata repository may be determined, and the URL may be transformed into a HyperText Transfer Protocol (HTTP) URL based on the domain name.
According to yet another embodiment of the present invention, a machine-readable medium for a computer system is disclosed. The machine-readable medium has stored thereon a series of instructions which, when executed by a processing component, cause the processing component to receive, from a software application in a plurality of software applications, a URL for a metadata document, the URL including a protocol component identifying a specialized protocol name and a path component identifying a name and namespace of the metadata document. The specialized protocol name indicates that the metadata document is a shared metadata document stored in a shared metadata repository. The series of instructions further cause the processing component to identify the shared metadata repository based on configuration information associated with the software application and (optionally) the namespace of the metadata document. In various embodiments, the metadata document may then be retrieved from the shared metadata repository. Alternatively, a domain name for the shared metadata repository may be determined, and the URL may be transformed into a HyperText Transfer Protocol (HTTP) URL based on the domain name.
A further understanding of the nature and advantages of the embodiments disclosed herein may be realized by reference to the remaining portions of the specification and the attached drawings.
Various embodiments in accordance with the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings, in which:
In the drawings, the use of like reference numbers in different drawings indicates similar components.
In the following description, for the purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide an understanding of the present invention. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without some of these specific details.
Embodiments of the present invention provide techniques for facilitating the sharing of a metadata document by a plurality of software applications. As described in further detail below, this sharing is achieved by having each application reference the metadata document using a specific type of URL. This URL includes a protocol component identifying a specialized protocol name (e.g., “oraclemds”) and a path component identifying a name and namespace of the metadata document. The specialized protocol name indicates that the metadata document is a shared document stored in a shared metadata repository. When an application needs to resolve the URL (i.e., determine the location of the metadata document), the URL is passed to a URL resolver integrated into the underlying application framework of the plurality of software applications. The URL resolver identifies the shared metadata repository based on configuration information associated with the application, as well as (optionally) the namespace of the metadata document. The metadata document is then retrieved from the metadata repository. In situations where the URL needs to be published for external consumption, the URL may be transformed into a standard HTTP URL.
Since embodiments of the present invention allow common metadata to be centralized at a single, shared location, the problems associated with duplicating metadata in different applications are minimized or avoided. Further, since the present techniques use URLs as metadata references, these techniques may be used in conjunction with existing application framework components and standards (e.g., development tools, XML processors, WSDL, etc.) that are adapted to reference metadata documents as URLs.
In some embodiments, the configuration information associated with each application may include additional information that is used by the URL resolver to retrieve the shared metadata document. For example, the configuration information may include version information indicating a specific version of the metadata document used by an application. Additionally, the configuration information may include customization information indicating a specific customization for the metadata document used by an application.
Embodiments of the present invention may be used in a variety of different domains and contexts. Certain embodiments are particularly applicable to enterprise software applications, which are often configured to make use of common metadata. However, embodiments of the present invention may be used to facilitate the sharing of metadata by any type of software application. Further, the sharing techniques described herein may be used throughout the lifecycle of a software application. For example, the sharing techniques may be used to facilitate metadata reuse during application development, testing, and deployment.
At step 102, a URL for a metadata document is received from a software application in the plurality of software applications. The URL includes a protocol component identifying a specialized protocol name, such as “oraclemds.” The specialized protocol name indicates that the metadata document referenced by the URL is a shared document that is stored in a shared metadata repository. In various embodiments, the specialized protocol name is a unique name that is different from any standard or well-known URL protocol, such as HTTP, FTP, or the like. The URL also includes a path component identifying a name and namespace for the metadata document. An example of such a URL is “oraclemds://soa/shared/workflow/taskservice.wsdl,” where the protocol component is “oraclemds://” and the path component is “soa/shared/workflow/taskservice.wsdl.”
At step 104, the URL is recognized as referencing a shared metadata document, and the shared metadata repository in which the document is stored is identified. In one set of embodiments, the identification is based on configuration information that is associated with the software application. For example, the configuration information may indicate a name and/or location of the shared metadata repository. In additional embodiments, the identification is further based on the namespace of the metadata document. The structure and content of the configuration information is discussed in greater detail below with respect to
Once the shared metadata repository has been identified, the metadata document is retrieved from the repository on behalf of the software application (step 106). In this manner, the software application (as well as any other application in the plurality of software applications) may access and reuse a single, shared copy of the metadata document. In some embodiments, the shared metadata document (or a metadata document referencing the shared metadata document) may need to be published for external consumption (i. e., for use by one or more external software applications that do not have access to a URL resolver performing the steps of flowchart 100). In these cases, the URL received in step 102 may be transformed into a standard HTTP URL that can be used by external software applications to retrieve the shared metadata document. This process of transforming URLs is discussed in greater detail below with respect to
It should be appreciated that the specific steps illustrated in
Configuration information 200 is adapted to reference one or more shared metadata repositories that may be used to store a shared metadata document. For example, configuration information 200 identifies two metadata stores (i.e., repositories) “mstore-usage—2” and “mstore-usage—3,” along with their physical addresses. The physical addresses may correspond to local or remote locations. Configuration information 200 may also include one or more namespace-to-repository mappings, such as the “metadata-namespaces” illustrated in
Although not shown, configuration information 200 may also include other information that is used to retrieve a shared metadata document on behalf of an associated software application. For example, configuration information 200 may include version information that identifies a particular version of the metadata document used by the application. Further, configuration information 200 may include customization information that identifies a particular customization (i.e., customized variant) of the metadata document used by the application. In this manner, various reusing applications may refer to a different version/customization of shared metadata. In a case wherein no versioning information for a metadata document is specified in the configuration information, the latest version of the metadata document may be automatically retrieved.
In some embodiments, configuration information 200 may be automatically generated by a development tool at design time of the associated software application. Further, the appropriate URLs for referencing shared metadata documents may be automatically created.
In various embodiments, Applications 302, 304 are structured to include one or more metadata documents, such as WSDL or XML Schema Definition (XSD) documents. These metadata documents are, in turn, structured to include references to one or more shared metadata documents via URLs having the format described in flowchart 100 of
At application runtime, the metadata documents included in an application 302, 304 are passed to metadata processor 306. Metadata processor 306 may be any conventional application framework component capable of parsing/processing structured metadata. In one embodiment, processor 306 is an XML parser/processor. As the metadata documents are being processed, the URLs included therein are passed to URL technology component 308. Like metadata processor 306, URL technology component 308 may be any conventional application framework component capable of processing standard URLs. In one embodiment, URL technology component 308 corresponds to an instance of the standard Java URLScheme class.
In various embodiments, the URLs from application 302, 304 are then passed from URL technology component 308 to URL resolver 310. Unlike metadata processor 306 and URL technology component 308, URL resolver 310 is a custom application framework component unique to embodiments of the present invention. Specifically, URL resolver 310 is a custom component adapted to resolve URLs for shared metadata documents in accordance with the steps of flowchart 100. For example, URL resolver 310 is configured to receive a metadata document URL having the specialized protocol name described with respect to flowchart 100 (e.g., “oraclemds”), and identify a shared metadata repository (e.g., 312) storing the metadata document based on configuration information associated with respective application 302, 304. The metadata document is then retrieved from the shared metadata repository on behalf of the application. In one embodiment, URL resolver 310 corresponds to a custom Java class that extends the standard URLScheme class.
Since URL resolver 310 interoperates with existing application framework components such as metadata processor 306 and URL technology component 308, embodiments of the present invention facilitate the sharing of metadata by a plurality of applications with minimal code changes to the applications and their underlying framework. Further, since URLs are dynamically resolved using configuration information (rather than being statically defined), the shared metadata repository can be moved from one physical location to another without requiring changes to the URLs.
In some embodiments, URL resolver 310 may be configured to automatically resolve relative URLs (i.e., URLs that do not include any protocol name) in shared metadata documents. Thus, for example, if a first shared metadata document “foo/mydoc1.xsd” references a second shared metadata document via a relative URL (such as “shared/mydoc2.xsd”), the second shared metadata document will be automatically retrieved as “oraclemds://foo/shared/mydoc2.xsd.”
As discussed previously, the sharing techniques of the present invention may be used throughout the lifecycle of an application. For example, these techniques may be used while an application is still in development.
As with applications 302, 304 of
When the application is executed in development environment 402, the URLs included therein are passed through standard components 306, 308 as described above for
In one set of embodiments, development environment 402 may be configured to automatically generate configuration information (such as configuration information 200 of
Assuming that steps 102 and 104 of flowchart 100 have been executed, a domain name for the shared metadata repository identified in step 104 is determined (step 502). In one embodiment, the domain name corresponds to a network address of a web server configured to serve data stored in the repository. The URL received at step 102 is then transformed into a standard HTTP URL based on the domain name (step 504). For example, the URL “oraclemds://soa/shared/mydoc.xml” may be transformed into “http://mds1/soa/shared/mydoc.xml,” where “mds1” is the domain name determined at step 502. This HTTP URL may then be used to retrieve “mydoc.xml” using standard HTTP protocol.
To address the above problem, servlet 604 is configured to pass the shared metadata URLs to URL resolver 310 via an appropriate internal application 302, 304 and application framework components 306, 308. In response, URL resolver 310 is configured to perform the processing of flowcharts 100 and 500 to transform the URLs into standard HTTP URLs. The standard HTTP URLs are then passed back to servlet 604, which publishes the standard HTTP URLs to external applications 602. In this manner, embodiments of the present invention allow internal applications to make use of the specialized URL protocol described herein to share metadata documents, while maintaining interoperability with external applications.
Client computing devices 702, 704, 706, 708 may be general purpose personal computers (including, by way of example, personal computers and/or laptop computers running various versions of Microsoft Windows and/or Apple Macintosh operating systems), cell phones or PDAs (running software such as Microsoft Windows Mobile and being Internet, e-mail, SMS, Blackberry, or other communication protocol enabled), and/or workstation computers running any of a variety of commercially-available UNIX or UNIX-like operating systems (including without limitation the variety of GNU/Linux operating systems). Alternatively, client computing devices 702, 704, 706, 708 may be any other electronic device, such as a thin-client computer, Internet-enabled gaming system, and/or personal messaging device, capable of communicating over a network (e.g., network 710 described below). Although system environment 700 is shown with four client computing devices, any number of client computing devices may be supported.
In most embodiments, system environment 700 includes a network 710. Network 710 may be any type of network familiar to those skilled in the art that can support data communications using any of a variety of commercially-available protocols, including without limitation TCP/IP, SNA, IPX, AppleTalk, and the like. Merely by way of example, network 710 can be a local area network (LAN), such as an Ethernet network, a Token-Ring network and/or the like; a wide-area network; a virtual network, including without limitation a virtual private network (VPN); the Internet; an intranet; an extranet; a public switched telephone network (PSTN); an infra-red network; a wireless network (e.g., a network operating under any of the IEEE 802.11 suite of protocols, the Bluetooth protocol known in the art, and/or any other wireless protocol); and/or any combination of these and/or other networks.
System environment 700 also includes one or more server computers 712 which may be general purpose computers, specialized server computers (including, by way of example, PC servers, UNIX servers, mid-range servers, mainframe computers, rack-mounted servers, etc.), server farms, server clusters, or any other appropriate arrangement and/or combination. In various embodiments, server 712 may be adapted to run one or more services or software applications described in the foregoing disclosure. For example, server 712 may correspond to an application server configured to execute one or more applications such as applications 302, 304 of
Server 712 may run an operating system including any of those discussed above, as well as any commercially available server operating system. Server 712 may also run any of a variety of additional server applications and/or mid-tier applications, including HTTP servers, FTP servers, CGI servers, Java servers, database servers, and the like. Exemplary database servers include without limitation those commercially available from Oracle, Microsoft, Sybase, IBM and the like.
System environment 700 may also include one or more data repositories 714, 716. For instance, data repositories 714, 716 may include one or more application repositories 714 configured to store transactional data for applications hosted on server 712, and one or more shared metadata repositories 716 such as repository 312 of
Computer system 800 may additionally include a computer-readable storage media reader 812, a communications subsystem 814 (e.g., a modem, a network card (wireless or wired), an infra-red communication device, etc.), and working memory 818, which may include RAM and ROM devices as described above. In some embodiments, computer system 800 may also include a processing acceleration unit 816, which can include a digital signal processor (DSP), a special-purpose processor, and/or the like.
Computer-readable storage media reader 812 can further be connected to a computer-readable storage medium 810, together (and, optionally, in combination with storage device(s) 808) comprehensively representing remote, local, fixed, and/or removable storage devices plus storage media for temporarily and/or more permanently containing computer-readable information. Communications system 814 may permit data to be exchanged with network 710 and/or any other computer described above with respect to system environment 700.
Computer system 800 may also comprise software elements, shown as being currently located within working memory 818, including an operating system 820 and/or other code 822, such as an application program (which may be a client application, Web browser, mid-tier application, RDBMS, etc.). In an exemplary embodiment, working memory 818 may include executable code and associated data structures (such as caches) for executing the processing of flowcharts 100 and 500 of
Storage media and computer readable media for containing code, or portions of code, can include any appropriate media known or used in the art, including storage media and communication media, such as but not limited to volatile and non-volatile, removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage and/or transmission of information such as computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules, o r other data, including RAM, ROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disk (DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, data signals, data transmissions, or any other medium which can be used to store or transmit the desired information and which can be accessed by a computer.
While the present invention has been described using a particular combination of hardware and software, it should be recognized that other combinations of hardware and software are also within the scope of the present invention. The present invention may be implemented only in hardware, or only in software, or using combinations thereof.
The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense. Many variations of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon review of the disclosure. The scope of the invention should, therefore, be determined not with reference to the above description, but instead should be determined with reference to the pending claims along with their full scope or equivalents.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5790778 | Bush et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5850518 | Northrup | Dec 1998 | A |
6117180 | Dave et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6138270 | Hsu | Oct 2000 | A |
6397254 | Northrup | May 2002 | B1 |
6401134 | Razavi et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6421705 | Northrup | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6442751 | Cocchi et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6487713 | Cohen et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6546413 | Northrup | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6601233 | Underwood | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6671713 | Northrup | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6671746 | Northrup | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6779000 | Northrup | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6807636 | Hartman et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6901580 | Iwanojko et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6922675 | Chatterjee et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6922705 | Northrup | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6947992 | Shachor | Sep 2005 | B1 |
7028019 | McMillan et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7062749 | Cyr et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7086009 | Resnick et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7188158 | Stanton et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7203938 | Ambrose et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7343360 | Ristanovic et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7349913 | Clark et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7535927 | Northrup | May 2009 | B1 |
7536606 | Andrews et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7584207 | Mortensen et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7603674 | Cyr et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7644262 | Bromley et al. | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7693851 | Becker | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7721158 | Lee | May 2010 | B2 |
7774477 | Zintel et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7783782 | Cromp et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7788338 | Savchenko et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7793340 | Kiester et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7827494 | Hedayatpour et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7840941 | Brookins et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7853899 | Damaschke et al. | Dec 2010 | B1 |
7865544 | Kordun et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7895512 | Roberts | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7933946 | Livshits et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7945907 | Dreiling et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7984424 | Dengler et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8015545 | Seto et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8108825 | Goodwin et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8209675 | Zhao et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8538998 | Barrow | Sep 2013 | B2 |
20020023140 | Hile et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020103660 | Cramon et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020129060 | Rollins et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143735 | Ayi et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020147757 | Day et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020188613 | Chakraborty et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030005117 | Kang et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030025732 | Prichard | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030033310 | Factor et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030034989 | Kondo | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030084424 | Reddy et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030088857 | Salva et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030172127 | Northrup | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030172168 | Mak et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030172193 | Olsen | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030192031 | Srinivasan et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204518 | Lang et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204645 | Sharma et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030233631 | Curry et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233642 | Hank | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040046787 | Henry et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040046789 | Inanoria | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040054991 | Harres | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040073565 | Kaufman et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078424 | Yairi et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040111533 | Beisiegel et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040111673 | Bowman et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040148588 | Sadiq | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040181534 | Mortensen et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040194016 | Liggitt | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040205117 | Hertling et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040205765 | Beringer et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040230639 | Soluk et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050044197 | Lai | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050183074 | Alexander et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050193061 | Schmidt et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050223361 | Belbute | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050251788 | Henke et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050273772 | Matsakis et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060010163 | Herzog et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015847 | Carroll, Jr. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060031750 | Waldorf et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036463 | Patrick et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060075387 | Martin et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060080117 | Carr et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060101038 | Gabriel et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060106626 | Jeng et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060130047 | Burugapalli | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060136832 | Keller et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060143229 | Bou-Ghannam et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060150156 | Cyr et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060165105 | Shenfield et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060168132 | Bunter et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060168355 | Shenfield et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060168557 | Agrawal et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060184866 | Rees | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060206858 | Becker et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060235733 | Marks | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060235986 | Kim | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060242636 | Chilimbi et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060253490 | Krishna et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265702 | Isaacson et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271537 | Chandrasekharan et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060277542 | Wipfel | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060294474 | Taylor et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060294506 | Dengler et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070016429 | Bournas et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070055936 | Dhanjal et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070106975 | Deline | May 2007 | A1 |
20070113191 | Keller et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070130205 | Dengler et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070157078 | Anderson | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070169199 | Quinnell et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174763 | Chang et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174822 | Moser et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070203956 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070220429 | Kureshy et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070240096 | Pontoppidan et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070245340 | Cohen et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070271552 | Pulley | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070277095 | Ukigawa | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282885 | Baude et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070294586 | Parvathy et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070294664 | Joshi | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080004887 | Brunswig et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080028302 | Meschkat | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080065675 | Bozich et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077848 | Roberts | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080083012 | Yu et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080104617 | Apacible et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080120557 | Offenhartz et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080126396 | Gagnon | May 2008 | A1 |
20080127087 | Brookins et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080127124 | Gilfix et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080162304 | Ourega | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080163164 | Chowdhary et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183479 | Iwashita et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183744 | Adendorff et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080184201 | Burns et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080189358 | Charles | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080189617 | Covell et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080196024 | Barfield et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080243901 | Super et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080250313 | Kamdar et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080275844 | Buzsaki et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080276218 | Taylor et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080276260 | Garlick et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080295109 | Huang et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080313648 | Wang et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090031280 | Koehler | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090083297 | Pohl et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090106494 | Knebel | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090144716 | Felts | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090144729 | Guizar | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090150565 | Grossner et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090157859 | Morris | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090158237 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090178020 | Goodwin et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090204567 | Barrow | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090204629 | Barrow | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090204884 | Barrow et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090204943 | Konduri | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090205013 | Lowes | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090217153 | Oshima et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090259993 | Konduri et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090292797 | Cromp et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100057482 | Radhakrishnan et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100057836 | Anbuselvan | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070553 | Addala et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070973 | Addala et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100082556 | Srinivasan et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100132009 | Khemani et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100146291 | Anbuselvan | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100313038 | Bradley | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110023071 | Li et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110119649 | Kand et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110119651 | Utschig-Utschig et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
G. Hildebrandt, Web-based Document Management, BTU 2001, pp. 1-21. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/790,437, filed May 28, 2010, Utschig-Utschig et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/791,445, filed May 28, 2010, Kand et al. |
Beisiegel, et al., “SCA Service Component Architecture—Assembly Model Specification,” Mar. 15, 2007, SCA version 1.00, 91 pages, BEA Systems, Inc. |
“Business Process Language (BPEL) and Oracle BPEL Process Manager,” Oracle FAQ, updated Jun. 26, 2004, printed on Nov. 11, 2009, at URL: http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/ias/bpel/htdocs/orabpel—faq.html?—template= . . . , 3 pages. |
Chapman, et al., “SCA Service Component Architecture—Client and Implementation Model Specification for WS-BPEL,” Mar. 21, 2007, SCA version 1.00, 15 pages, BEA Systems, Inc. |
Chappell, “Introducing SCA,” David Chappell & Associates, Jul. 2007, pp. 1-22. |
CipherSoft Inc, “Exodus—Main Features Benefits” Products, at URL: http://www.ciphersoftinc.com/products/expdus-features-benefits.html; printed on Aug. 28, 2009; 3 pages. |
CipherSoft Inc, “Exodus™ Products,” printed on Aug. 28, 2009, at URL: http://www.ciphersoftinc.com/products/migration-products-overview.html; 3 pages. |
“Client-Server Modernization—From Oracle® Forms to Java,” VGO Software Products, printed on Aug. 28, 2009, at URL: http://www.vgosoftware.com/products/evo/index.php; 2 pages. |
Dynamic Structure in ADF UIX Pages, from Oracle ADF UIX Developer's Guide, pp. 1-11 downloaded from http://www.oracle.com/webapps/online-help/jdeveloper/10.1.2/state/content/navId.4/navSetId.—/vtAnchor.DeltaTree/vtTopicFile.uixhelp%7Cuixdevguide%7Cdynamic%7Ehtml/ on Apr. 21, 2008. |
“Oracle Forms to Java Modernization” printed on Aug. 28, 2009, at URL: http://www.vgosoftware.com/products/evo/walkthrough.php; VGO Software Information printed 5 pages. |
Shepherd, et al., “Oracle SCA—The Power of the Composite,” An Oracle White Paper, Aug. 2009, pp. 1-19, Oracle. |
“Vgo Software First to Convert Oracle Forms to Oracle ADF V11”; VGO News, printed on Aug. 28, 2009; at URL: http://www.vgosoftware.com/about/news/view—article.php?new—id=35; 2 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/029,605, mailed on May 12, 2010, 13 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/029,605, mailed on Sep. 28, 2010, 15 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/029,609, mailed on May 26, 2010, 17 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/029,609, mailed on Oct. 13, 2010, 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/203,816, mailed on Sep. 2, 2010, 18 pages. |
Zhang, et al., “Schema Based XML Security: RBAC Approach,” Machine Simulator, Third International Conference on Computer Assisted Learning, Published 2003, at URL: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.3.6016, pp. 1-15. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/029,724, mailed on Dec. 14, 2010, 43 pages. |
Smith, Portals: Toward an Application Framework for Interoperability,: Communications of the ACM, Oct. 2004, vol. 47, No. 10, pp. 93-97. |
Phanouriou, “UIML: A Device-Independent User Interface Markup Language,” Doctoral Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Sep. 26, 2000, 172 pages. |
“File and Registry Virtualization—the good, the bad, and the ugly,” Jerry's Incoherent Babbling; Windows Connected Blog; Published Dec. 19, 2005; at URL: http://windowsconnected.com/blogs/jerry/archive/2005/12/19/file-and-registry-virtualization-the-good-the-bad-and-t . . . ; 6 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/029,600, mailed on Apr. 27, 2011, 216 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/029,724, mailed on May 5, 2011, 27 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/203,816, mailed on Jan. 20, 2011, 26 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/210,657 mailed on Jun. 26, 2012, 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/330,008 mailed on Jun. 11, 2012, 7 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/029,615 mailed on Jul. 31, 2012, 33 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/330,008 mailed on Aug. 7, 2012, 17 pages. |
Mietzner, et al., “Defining Composite Configurable SaaS Application Packages Using SCA Variability Descriptors and Multi-Tenancy Patters,”, 2008, pp. 156-161. |
“Phillips, Josh. Window's Connected UseriD: Jerry. Jerry's Incoherent Babbling: ““File and Registry Virtualization—the good, the bad, and the ugly””. <http:/ /wi ndowsco n nected. co m/b logs/jerry/arch ive/2005/ 12/1 9/fi l e-and-reg istry-vi rtual izatio n-th e-good-th ebad- and-the-ugly.aspx>. Published: Dec. 19, 2005.” |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/203,816 mailed on Oct. 26, 2012 30 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/029,724 mailed on Jan. 7, 2013, 39 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/029,724 mailed on Apr. 30, 2013, 33 pages. |
Terminal Disclaimer—Approved for U.S. Appl. No. 12/029,600 mailed on Oct. 25, 2011, 1 page. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/029,600 mailed on Sep. 17, 2012, 38 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/029,600 mailed on Nov. 7, 2012, 16 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/029,600 mailed on Feb. 5, 2013, 16 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/029,605 mailed on Apr. 10, 2013, 38 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/029,609 mailed on Jul. 28, 2011, 29 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/029,609 mailed on Feb. 4, 2013, 52 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/212,599 mailed on Aug. 2, 2012, 18 pages. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/487,004 mailed on May 24, 2012, 5 pages. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/029,615 mailed on Oct. 16, 2012, 5 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/790,437 mailed on Jan. 30, 2013, 31 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/790,445 mailed on Dec. 19, 2012, 30 pages. |
Claessens, J., et al., “A Tangled World Web of Security Issues.” First Monday vol. 7, No. 3-4, (Mar. 2002): 24 pages. Web. Jun. 25, 2013. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/203,816 mailed on Jul. 5, 2013, 25 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/029,600 mailed on Jun. 11, 2013, 10 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/029,609 mailed on May 29, 2013, 14 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/212,599 mailed on Jun. 19, 2013, 6 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/790,437 mailed on Jul. 12, 2013, 12 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/790,445 mailed on Jul. 5, 2013, 10 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/360,127, filed Jan. 27, 2012 by Krishnamurthy et al. |
“AJAX & Security: Vulnerability in DWR Security Logic Identified Can Potentially be exploited to launce DoS attacks and break into back-end servers”, published Jan. 8, 2007, AjaxWorld™ Magazine, pp. 1-4 downloaded on Oct. 6, 2008 from http://ajax.sys-con.com/node/319868, 4 pages. |
“Direct Web Remoting, About DWR's Javascript Security”, 4 pages downloaded from http://directwebremoting.org/dwr/security/script-tag-protection on Oct. 6, 2008. |
“Direct Web Remoting, DWR version 2—New and Noteworthy”, 4 pages downloaded from http://directwebremoting.org/dwr/changelog/dwr20 on Dec. 5, 2008. |
“Direct Web Remoting, DWR: Easy AJAX for JAVA”, 2 pages downloaded from http://directwebremoting.org/dwr/overview/dwr on Oct. 6, 2008. |
“Direct Web Remoting, Safari, GET and Request Forgery”, 1 page downloaded from http://directwebremoting.org/dwr/security/allowGetForSafariButMakeForgeryEasier on Oct. 6, 2008. |
“Direct Web Remoting, Security”, 4 pages downloaded from http://directwebremoting.org/dwr/security on Oct. 6, 2008. |
“Google Web Toolkit, Product Overview”, 3 pages downloaded from http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/overview.html on Oct. 6, 2008. |
“Oracle Application Framework”, Oracle, Dec. 2006, pp. 1-242, 242 pages. |
Altenhofen et al., “ASMs in Service Oriented Architectures”, Journal of Universal Computer Science, vol. 14, No. 12, 2008, 25 pages. |
Box et al., “Web Services Addressing (WS-Addressing)” Aug. 10, 2004, 23 pages, http://www.w3.org/Submission/ws-addressing/#—Toc77464317 printed on Aug. 18, 2009, 23 pages. |
Carey, “Making BPEL Processes Dynamic” Oracle Technology Network, 8 pages, printed on Aug. 18, 2009, 8 pages. |
Claypool et al., “Optimizing Performance of Schema Evolution Sequences”, Objects and Databases [online], 2000 [retrieved Feb. 7, 2012], retrieved from Internet: http://se-pubs.dbs.uni-leipzig.de/files/Claypool2000OptimizingPerformanceofSchemaEvolutionSequences.pdf, pp. 114-127, 14 pages. |
Curphey et al., “Web Application Security Assessment Tools”, IEEE, 2006, pp. 32-41, 10 pages. |
Dipaola et al., “Subverting Ajax”, Dec. 2006, 23rd CCC Conference, pp. 1-8, 8 pages. |
Hohpe et al., “Messaging Systems” Enterprise Integration Patterns 2004, pp. 57-97, Chapter 3, Pearson Education, Inc, Boston, Massachusetts, 45 pages. |
Nagappan et al., “XML Processing and Data Binding with Java APIs” in: Developing Java Web Services: Architecting and Developing Secure Web Services Using Java [online], 2003 [retrieved Feb. 7, 2012], retrieved from Internet: http://java.sun.com/developer/Books/j2ee/devjws/, pp. 313-399, 89 pages. |
Steinberg, “Data Binding with JAXB” [online], 2003 [retrieved Feb. 7, 2012], retrieved from Internet: https://www6.software.ibm.com/developerworks/education/x-jabx/x-jaxb-a4.pdf, pp. 1-34, 34 pages. |
Shang-Pin Ma, “Discovery-Based Service Composition,” National Central University, Doctoral Dissertation. Jan. 2007, 109 pages. |
Yang et al., “Web Component: A Substrate for Web Service Reuse and Composition”. Proc. 14th Conf. Advanced Information Systems Eng. (CAiSE 02), LNCS 2348, Springer-Verlag, 2002, 16 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/210,657 mailed on Apr. 25, 2011, 21 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/210,657 mailed on Sep. 30, 2011, 21 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/212,599 mailed on Dec. 22, 2011, 10 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/330,008 mailed on Dec. 21, 2011, 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/029,615 mailed on Feb. 15, 2012, 27 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/101,420 mailed on Feb. 24, 2012, 20 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/487,004 mailed on Mar. 19, 2012, 30 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/210,657 mailed on Apr. 3, 2012, 23 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/330,008 mailed on Apr. 10, 2012, 13 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/029,600 mailed on Oct. 19, 2011, 20 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/029,605 mailed on Nov. 2, 2011, 13 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/029,609 mailed on Nov. 8, 2011, 13 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/101,420 mailed on Oct. 5, 2011, 18 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/029,605 mailed on Jul. 20, 2011, 12 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090313256 A1 | Dec 2009 | US |