The field of the invention is wellbore cleaning devices and more particularly devices that collect debris with reverse circulation and employ a closure for well control when the device is run in or pulled out of the hole.
Wellbore cleanup tools such as those offered by Baker Hughes Incorporated, a GE company under the name VACS have been in use to remove and capture borehole debris. These tools work on an eductor powered by tubing flow from the surface to draw debris laden flow into the bottom of the tool. The flow enters through an inlet tube surrounded by a debris reservoir. The heavier debris settles into the reservoir while smaller debris continues up the tool drawn by the eductor fluid inlet at which there is a reduced pressure due to the connected motive fluid. The drawn fluid is moved through a screen inside the tool to further remove particulates. The eductor discharge is laterally to the surrounding annulus where the flow can go in two opposed directions. Most of the flow goes to the surface through the annulus and the rest goes down the annulus and is drawn into the open lower end of the tool with fresh debris laden flow. Some examples of this tool are shown in U.S. Pat. No. 7,472,745 and more recently as improved in U.S. Pat. No. 9,494,005. Flapper valves to retain debris from falling out of a tool once brought into the tool and using sensors to detect well conditions in bottom hole assemblies in a jet cleaning application are shown in US 2009/0151936.
What the reverse circulation debris cleanup devices have not had in the past is a way to control the well as the devices are run in or being removed. The collected debris reservoirs have also increased in length to over 1000 meters below eductor 34. The problem this causes is that the tool will have wall openings that cannot be captured in a lubricator because of limited length of lubricators of about 30 meters. This make a need for isolating the formation for running in or removal of the debris cleanup tool. The situation is schematically illustrated in
The present invention addresses this shortcoming in the prior designs by providing a closure against pressure surges from the formation before they even begin. The device adds a valve that stays open for normal operation as shown in
A reverse circulation debris cleanup tool has a pressure control valve that closes up a passage through the body based on a sensed well condition to help pressure control the well when rams close around the tool to isolate the surrounding annulus. The sensor can hold the valve open for a predetermined time to allow debris removal operations and then close. The debris chamber below an eductor in a VACS tool can be thousands of feet long and the valve can provide protection during running in or removal of the tool from well pressure events so as to avoid using shear rams and losing the bottom hole assembly in the borehole and a fishing operation to get it out.
Valve 50 is provided in passage 44 below the eductor 34 and is controlled in a variety of ways to close at an appropriate time to contain formation pressure safely. A sensor 52 is schematically illustrated in the tool 30 but can easily be part of a communication system from the surface that will trigger the valve 52 to close to contain well pressure.
The system to trigger the valve 50 to close can include flow or lack of flow, flow rate change, temperature, vibration, magnetic force, rotation, acoustic, electric, applied pressure, pressure cycles, pressure drop or loss, hydrostatic pressure, presence of specific fluids or of fluids having specific physical properties, or a combination of any of the above. Other triggers to selectively close valve 50 pressure drop or vibration induced flow, time delays after the onset of flow to allow the debris cleanup to conclude, dropping objects or fluids into the string or magnets or other types of sonde to trigger the closure of the valve. The signal can be acoustic through the tubular wall or electric within or on either side of a tubular wall. A circulation sub above the debris removal tool can be used to allow circulation after the valve 50 is closed, if desired. Pressure can be delivered from the surface with the valve closed to make sure valve 50 is closed and holding pressure.
The use of the valve 50 allows tripping in or out with the valve closed for well control purposes. Standard barriers would impede the flow needed during debris capture operations. The implemented solution to provide pressure control protection has to be implemented after the suction created by the eductor has finished sucking in debris and the tool is ready to come out. The valve 50 can be designed to run in closed for protection going in the hole and then triggered to open for at least a predetermined time or until triggered to close either from local conditions or from a surface signal. The fact of the barrier valve 50 closing, if locally initiated, can be signaled to the surface. Alternatively the signal to close can come from the surface. The idea is to control well pressure excursions when running in or pulling out the tool assembly that could be longer than 100 meters for storage capacity.
The above description is illustrative of the preferred embodiment and many modifications may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the invention whose scope is to be determined from the literal and equivalent scope of the claims below:
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1513083 | Baker | Oct 1924 | A |
1513443 | Boynton | Oct 1924 | A |
1958915 | Fletcher | May 1934 | A |
2050289 | Dunlap | Aug 1936 | A |
2061489 | Taylor | Nov 1936 | A |
2169922 | Notley | Aug 1939 | A |
2182374 | Dumble | Dec 1939 | A |
2550080 | Moore | Apr 1951 | A |
2700567 | Fortenberry | Jan 1955 | A |
3023810 | Anderson | Mar 1962 | A |
4190113 | Harrison | Feb 1980 | A |
4493383 | Williams | Jan 1985 | A |
4721156 | Campbell | Jan 1988 | A |
4924940 | Burroughs | May 1990 | A |
6158512 | Unsgaard | Dec 2000 | A |
6196319 | Henskens | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6276452 | Davis | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6427776 | Hoffman | Aug 2002 | B1 |
7472745 | Lynde et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7610957 | Davis | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7836955 | Creighton | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8453724 | Zhou | Jun 2013 | B2 |
9494005 | Stowe | Nov 2016 | B2 |
20020174987 | Hoffman | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20080236834 | Creighton | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090151936 | Greenaway | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100288492 | Blackman | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110024119 | Wolf | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20120061073 | Soni | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120118571 | Zhou | May 2012 | A1 |
20120152522 | Lynde | Jun 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19859666 | Mar 2000 | DE |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190153796 A1 | May 2019 | US |