The present disclosure relates generally to reverse osmosis systems, and, more specifically, to a multi-stage reverse osmosis system having a centralized pumping source.
The statements in this section merely provide background information related to the present disclosure and may not constitute prior art.
Reverse osmosis systems are used to provide fresh water from brackish or sea water. A membrane is used that restricts the flow of dissolved solids therethrough.
Referring now to
The permeate stream 14 is purified fluid flow at a low pressure. The brine stream 16 is a higher pressure stream that contains dissolved materials blocked by the membrane. The pressure of the brine stream 16 is only slightly lower than the feed stream 18. The membrane array 12 requires an exact flow rate for optimal operation. The flow rate provides a specific pressure for optimization. A brine throttle valve 24 may be used to regulate the flow through the membrane array 12. Changes take place due to water temperature, salinity, as well as membrane characteristics, such as fowling. The membrane array 12 may also be operated at off-design conditions on an emergency basis. The feed pumping system is required to meet variable flow and pressure requirements.
In general, a higher feed pressure increases permeate production and, conversely, a reduced feed pressure reduces permeate production. The membrane array 12 is required to maintain a specific recovery which is the ratio of the permeate flow to feed flow. The feed flow or brine flow likewise requires regulation.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
In a large reverse osmosis plant 50, the objective is to use a feed pump with the largest available capacity to achieve the highest possible efficiency at the lowest capital cost per unit of capacity. The optimal capacity of a membrane array 12 is usually smaller than the pumps. Therefore, a single-feed pump 20 may be used to multiple supply membrane arrays 12. Such a configuration is called centralized feed pumping. Because each of the membranes has a variable pressure requirement, individual control using the throttle valves 30a-30c and 24a-24c may be used. However, using throttle valves wastes energy. Also, the individual membranes themselves may have their own pressure requirements due to the following level of the membranes which may vary over the membrane array.
Referring now to
Referring now to
The present disclosure provides a reverse osmosis system that is cost effective by using centralized pumping but is capable of individual control at the various membrane stages.
In one aspect of the disclosure, a reverse osmosis system includes a membrane chamber having a feed line generating a permeate stream and a brine stream. A feed pump pressurizes the feed line. A first flow meter generates a first flow signal corresponding to a flow of fluid in the permeate stream. A booster device has a turbine in fluid communication with the brine stream and a pump in fluid communication with the feed line. A motor is coupled to the turbine device and a variable frequency drive is attached to the turbine device operating in response to the first flow signal. A second flow meter generates a second flow signal corresponding to a flow of fluid in the brine stream and a variable size nozzle operates an opening in response to the second flow meter.
In a further aspect of the disclosure, a method includes pressurizing the feed line, generating a first flow signal corresponding to a flow of fluid in the permeate stream, operating a variable frequency drive in response to the first flow signal, controlling the motor in response to the variable frequency drive, generating a second flow signal corresponding to a flow of fluid in the brine stream, and controlling an opening of a variable size nozzle fluidically coupled to the turbine portion in response to the second flow signal.
Further areas of applicability will become apparent from the description provided herein. It should be understood that the description and specific examples are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure.
The drawings described herein are for illustration purposes only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure in any way.
The following description is merely exemplary in nature and is not intended to limit the present disclosure, application, or uses. For purposes of clarity, the same reference numbers will be used in the drawings to identify similar elements. As used herein, the phrase at least one of A, B, and C should be construed to mean a logical (A or B or C), using a non-exclusive logical or. It should be understood that steps within a method may be executed in different order without altering the principles of the present disclosure.
Referring now to
The feed manifold 152 is coupled to respective isolation valves 210a, 210b, 210c, 220a, 220b, 220c, 216a, 216b and 216c. The feed stream is then provided to the hemis 170a, 170b and 170c within the respective first stage 158a, 158b, 158c. More specifically, the feed stream is directed to the pump portion 174a of booster 172a of the hemi 170a, the pump portion 174b of booster 172b of hemi 170b and the pump portion 174c of booster 172c of hemi 170c. The hemis 170a, 170b and 170c also include turbine portions 176a, 176b and 176c coupled together with the respective pump portion 174a, 174b and 174c using a respective common shaft 180a, 180b and 180c. The hemis 170a, 170b and 170c also include a respective motor 178a, 178b and 178c and respective variable frequency drives 182a, 182b and 182c. The variable frequency drives 182a, 182b and 182c may include a respective controller 212a, 212b and 212c. The respective boosters 172a, 172b and 172c raise the feed pressure through pump portion 174a, 174b and 174c. The increased-pressure feed stream 118 enters the respective membrane array 112a, 112b and 112c and generates a respective permanent stream 114a, 114b and 114c and a brine stream 116a, 116b and 116c. The permeate streams 114a, 114b and 114c pass through a flow meter 214a, 214b and 214c and respective isolation valves 216a, 216b and 216c. The flow through the isolation valves 216a, 216b and 216c is coupled to a permeate manifold 156.
The brine stream 116a, 116b, 116c passes through respective flow meters 218a, 218b and 218c to the respective turbine section 176a, 176b, 176c. The turbine portions 176a, 176b and 176c are coupled to a brine isolation valve 220a, 220b and 220c of the reverse osmosis system 110. Each of the isolation valves 220a-220c are coupled to a brine manifold 222.
The hemi 178 increases the feed pressure and the flow level required by the membrane array 112a. Energy recovery is performed with the brine stream 116a through the turbine portion 176a. Substantial portion of the pressure of the feed stream is generated by the combination of the high pressure pump 120 and the pump 174a. Motor 178a provides a brine adjustment to the shaft speed 180. The brine adjustment may take place due to wear of various components in the system and other requirements. The motor speed and, thus, the shaft speed is adjusted or may be adjusted by the variable frequency drive 182a. Because the requirement for adjustment is small, the motor 178a and, thus, the variable frequency drive 182a are sized relatively small, typically five percent, of the rating of the central pump 120.
The motor 178a may also act as a generator. Should the speed of the shaft 180a be too large, the motor 178a may act as a generator and provide power to the power system 230. Power system 230 may represent the power system of the reverse osmosis system 110. The motor may be an induction motor that is capable of acting as a generator or as a motor in combination with a regenerative variable frequency drive. The regenerative variable frequency drive allows the induction motor to act as a generator.
The flow meter signal generated by the flow meter 214a corresponds to the flow in the permeate. The flow meter signal is coupled to the controller 212a which, in turn, will cause the variable frequency drive 182a to increase the speed of the motor 178a and attached shaft 180a resulting in a high-pressure boost in the pump portion 182a. A higher feed pressure will, thus, be provided to the membrane 112a.
It should be noted that the controller 212 may be implemented in various configurations including digital circuitry, analog circuitry, microprocessor-based circuitry, or the like.
A variable area nozzle 240a may be coupled to the turbine portion 176a. The variable area nozzle 240 may change the area of an opening therethrough to increase or decrease the brine flow. The variable area nozzle 240 is electrically coupled to the flow meter 218a. Variable area nozzle 240 controls the area of the opening in response to the flow meter signal. If the brine flow is below a duty point, the flow meter signal 218a will cause the flow area in the nozzle 240 to increase permitting a higher brine flow. Conversely, if the brine flow rate is above the duty point, the flow meter signal will cause the area of the variable nozzle 240 to reduce the brine flow. A comparison may therefore take place. By controlling either or both signals, the permeate flow and the brine flow may be controlled to desirable levels.
It should be noted that each of the separate sections of
Those skilled in the art can now appreciate from the foregoing description that the broad teachings of the disclosure can be implemented in a variety of forms. Therefore, while this disclosure includes particular examples, the true scope of the disclosure should not be so limited since other modifications will become apparent to the skilled practitioner upon a study of the drawings, the specification and the following claims.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/811,622, filed Jun. 11, 2007, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/813,764, filed on Jun. 14, 2006. The disclosure of the above application is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
659930 | Kemble | Oct 1900 | A |
893127 | Barber | Jul 1908 | A |
1022683 | Kienast | Apr 1912 | A |
1024111 | Anderson | Apr 1912 | A |
1066581 | Brown | Jul 1913 | A |
2715367 | Kodet et al. | Aug 1955 | A |
2748714 | Henry | Jun 1956 | A |
3160108 | Sence | Dec 1964 | A |
3563618 | Ivanov | Feb 1971 | A |
3614259 | Neff | Oct 1971 | A |
3664758 | Sato | May 1972 | A |
3748057 | Eskeli | Jul 1973 | A |
3828610 | Swearingen | Aug 1974 | A |
3969804 | Macinnes et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
3999377 | Oklejas et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
4028885 | Ganley et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4029431 | Bachl | Jun 1977 | A |
4187173 | Keefer | Feb 1980 | A |
4230564 | Keefer | Oct 1980 | A |
4243523 | Pelmulder | Jan 1981 | A |
4255081 | Oklejas et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4288326 | Keefer | Sep 1981 | A |
4353874 | Keller et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4432876 | Keefer | Feb 1984 | A |
4434056 | Keefer | Feb 1984 | A |
4472107 | Chang et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
RE32144 | Keefer | May 1986 | E |
4632756 | Coplan et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4702842 | Lapierre | Oct 1987 | A |
4772385 | Yamada | Sep 1988 | A |
4830572 | Oklejas, Jr. et al. | May 1989 | A |
4921603 | Yen | May 1990 | A |
4936997 | Taniguchi et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4956596 | Ogashi | Sep 1990 | A |
4966708 | Oklejas et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4973408 | Keefer | Nov 1990 | A |
4983305 | Oklejas et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4997357 | Eirich et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5020969 | Mase et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5043071 | Anselme et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5049045 | Oklejas et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5082428 | Oklejas et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5106262 | Oklejas et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5132015 | Down | Jul 1992 | A |
5132090 | Volland | Jul 1992 | A |
5133639 | Gay et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5154572 | Toyoshima et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5320755 | Hagqvist et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5338151 | Kemmner et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5340286 | Kanigowski | Aug 1994 | A |
5401395 | Hagqvist et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5482441 | Permar | Jan 1996 | A |
5499900 | Khmara et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5647973 | Desaulniers | Jul 1997 | A |
5702229 | Moss et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5819524 | Bosley et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5951169 | Oklejas et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5980114 | Oklejas, Jr. | Nov 1999 | A |
6007723 | Ikada et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6017200 | Childs et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6036435 | Oklejas | Mar 2000 | A |
6110360 | Hart, Jr. | Aug 2000 | A |
6110375 | Bacchus et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6116851 | Oklejas, Jr. | Sep 2000 | A |
6120689 | Tonelli et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6139740 | Oklejas | Oct 2000 | A |
6187200 | Yamamura et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6190556 | Uhlinger | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6299766 | Permar | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309174 | Oklejas, Jr. et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6345961 | Oklejas, Jr. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6468431 | Oklejas, Jr. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6508937 | Kawashima et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6589423 | Chancellor | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6609070 | Lueck | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6709599 | Rosenberger et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6713028 | Oklejas, Jr. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6797173 | Oklejas, Jr. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6881336 | Johnson | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6908546 | Smith | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6932907 | Haq et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6936140 | Paxton et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7077962 | Pipes | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7150830 | Katsube et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
20030080058 | Kimura et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040104157 | Beeman et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040211729 | Sunkara et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20060157409 | Hassan | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060157410 | Hassan | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060226077 | Stark | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060254981 | Efraty | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070056907 | Gordon | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070181473 | Manth et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070199878 | Eisberg et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070289904 | Oklejas | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070295650 | Yoneda et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080023410 | Efraty | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080217222 | Efraty | Sep 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
150836 | Feb 2005 | EP |
2363741 | Jan 2002 | GB |
WO 9823361 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO0209855 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO2006106158 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO2007146321 | Dec 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
El-Sayed E et al.: “Performance evaluation of two RO membrane configurations in a MSF/RO hybrid system”. Desalination, Elsevier, Amsterdam, NL, vol. 128, No. 3, May 1, 2000 (May 1, 2000), pp. 231-245, XP004204830; ISSN: 0011-9164; p. 232-p. 234; figure 1. |
Geisler P et al.: “Reduction of the energy demand for seawater RO with the pressure exchange system PES”. Desalination, Elsevier, Amsterdam, NL, vol. 135, No. 1-3, Apr. 20, 2001 (Apr. 20, 2001), pp. 205-210, XP004249642; ISSN: 0011-9164; the whole document. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120138536 A1 | Jun 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60813764 | Jun 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11811622 | Jun 2007 | US |
Child | 13348392 | US |