1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to magnetic door stops and latches. More particularly, this invention relates to a device that uses the attractive and repulsive characteristics of magnets for purposes of (1) preventing doors and other similar closures from slamming against a wall, baseboard, door jamb or door frame, or minimizing the force of such slamming, and (2) holding doors or similar closures in a stationary open or closed position, such that the door can be moved from such stationary position by applying sufficient force to overcome the magnetic force.
2. Background of the Invention
Magnets have been used in devices for holding doors in the closed position. For example, magnetic door latch devices have been previously developed and are commonly found in the doors of kitchen cabinets, refrigerators, freezers, media cabinets, storage containers and numerous other such closures. Magnets have also been used in connection with mechanical latches and locks, with magnetic (usually electromagnetic) force applied to move or actuate a mechanical latch or lock mechanism.
Other magnetic devices have been previously developed for holding doors open. For example, simple magnetic door catches, such as that disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,505,502, are also well known. Such devices use permanent magnetic force to hold a door in the open position, but perform no other function. Magnetic door holding devices also have been previously used in connection with fire safety systems, in which fire doors are held open by magnetic contacts on both the door and a wall behind the door. In such devices, the magnetic force holding the door open is overcome by electromagnetic or other means, thus automatically allowing the fire doors to swing closed.
While the use of magnets in these applications is well known, magnetic forces are not addressed to the problem of stopping doors from slamming or banging when opened or closed violently. Therefore, there arises a need in the art for a magnetic door stop that uses the repulsive forces of the magnets to prevent a door from slamming into a wall or door frame. More specifically, there arises a need in the art for a magnetic door stop that uses both the repulsive and attractive forces of magnets, selectively at the option of the user, to either hold a door in the open position (using the attractive forces of the magnets) or prevent a door from slamming (using the repulsive forces of the magnets).
To achieve the foregoing and other objects, and in accordance with the purposes of the present invention as embodied and broadly described herein, the present invention provides a magnetic apparatus that functions to prevent slamming of a door or other such closure using the repulsive forces of a magnet. The present invention also provides such a device that can be selectively set by the user so that in one position the device secures a door or other such closure device in an opened or closed position (using the attractive forces of the magnets) and in another position the device acts to prevent a door from slamming (using the repulsive forces of the magnets).
In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, one magnet is mounted on or within a door and one magnet is mounted on a structure opposing the door, such as a baseboard, wall, or doorframe. The like poles of the magnets are adjacent to one another and thus repel one another. This may be accomplished in many possible configurations, including with the magnets aligned so that they make contact with one another upon the exertion of sufficient force, or with the magnets not actually making contact with one another but rather reaching sufficient proximity for the repulsive force to act in controlling or arresting the motion of the door.
In further accordance with the present invention, one of the two magnets may be mounted in a fashion that allows the magnet to be rotated or otherwise repositioned, such that in a one position, opposite magnetic poles of two magnets are adjacent to each other, and in a second position, like magnetic poles of the magnets are adjacent to each other.
The present invention has the advantages of providing an inexpensive, simple, and easy to operate mechanism that prevents noise and damage from slamming doors, but yet can be easily overridden by application of a moderate amount of manual force. The present invention also provides a simple means of selectively holding a door open or closed, but in a manner that allows the door to be manually moved. All of these advantages are achieved without moving parts, or with a minimal number of moving parts, this reducing the difficulties associated with installation, maintenance and use.
The foregoing and other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following, more particular description of a preferred embodiment of the invention, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings.
A preferred embodiment of the present invention is now described with reference to the figures, where like reference numbers indicate identical or functionally similar elements. Also in the figures, the left most digit of each reference number corresponds to the figure in which the reference number is first used. While specific configurations and arrangements are discussed, it should be understood that this is done for illustrative purposes only. A person skilled in the relevant art will recognize that other configurations and arrangements can be used without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Referring to
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
If the user wants repulsive configuration 124, inserted magnet 836 should be positioned so that the like poles of the magnets are adjacent to one another and thus repel one another. For example, if magnet 112 on door 110 is mounted such that the “positive” end 114 is exposed, inserted magnet 836 should be aligned so that “positive” portion 838 is located over mid-portion 844 of magnet holder 828. Alternatively, if the user wants attractive configuration 226, inserted magnet 836 should be positioned so that the opposite poles of the magnets are adjacent to one another and thus attract one another. For example, if magnet 112 on door 110 is mounted such that the “positive” end 114 is exposed, inserted magnet 836 should be aligned so that “negative” portion 840 is located over mid-portion 844 of magnet holder 828. The user can switch between the repulsive and attractive configurations by simply shifting inserted magnet 836 so that the desired portion, either “positive” portion 838 or “negative” portion 840 is located over mid-portion 844 of magnet holder 828.
Magnet holder 928 also includes a latch mechanism 960 which permits easy rotation of second magnet 112, but also holds magnet 112 in place when user selects repulsive or attractive configuration of magnetic door stop. Shown on
First magnet 102 and second magnet 112 may be any appropriate magnetic material, including permanent magnets or electromagnets, and may vary in size. If magnetic door stop 100 is constructed with electromagnets, a user may select repulsive configuration 124 or attractive configuration 226 using a switch (not shown) that allows electric current to flow and consequently produces a magnetic field. In addition, magnetic door stop 100 may also be constructed by using a door of at least partially magnetic material instead of mounting first magnet 102 on door 110. With a door of at least partially magnetic material, second magnet 112 may be oriented in an attractive or repulsive configuration with the magnetic door.
First magnet 102a and second magnet 104a may be in a repulsive configuration or a attractive configuration. Repulsive configuration is accomplished when the like poles of first and second magnets are adjacent to one another and thus repel one another, i.e. “positive” end 104a of first magnet 102a will repel “positive” end 114a of second magnet 112a and “negative” end 106a of first magnet 102a will repel “negative” end 116a of second magnet 112a. Attractive configuration is accomplished when the opposite poles of first magnet 102a and second magnet 112a are adjacent to one another and thus attract one another, i.e. “positive” end 104a of first magnet 102a will attract “negative” end 116a of second magnet 112a and “negative” end 106a of first magnet 102a will attract “positive” end 114a of second magnet 112a. Attractive configuration results in door 110a being held in a closed position with doorframe 120a.
As shown in
Alternately, second magnet 112a may be mounted within doorframe 120a such that user may switch second magnet 112a to be in a repulsive configuration with first magnet 102a or an attractive configuration with first magnet 102a. Second magnet 112a may be mounted in a channel of doorframe 120a such that user may simply pull second magnet 112a out of the channel, flip it around to the desired “positive” end 114a or “negative” end 116a, and insert back in the channel.
First magnet 102a and second magnet 112a may be any appropriate magnetic material, including permanent magnets or electromagnets, and may vary in size. If magnetic door latch 100a is constructed with electromagnets, a user may select repulsive configuration or attractive configuration using a switch (not shown) that allows electric current to flow and consequently produces a magnetic field.
While this invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
This application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/620,804 filed Jul. 2, 2003, now abandoned, which is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/308,109 filed Dec. 3, 2002 that issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,588,811 on Jul. 8, 2003, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1701202 | Dudley | Feb 1929 | A |
2471635 | Mark et al. | May 1949 | A |
2496691 | Berry | Feb 1950 | A |
2584480 | Manting | Feb 1952 | A |
2761718 | Tool | Sep 1956 | A |
2955239 | Rouse | Oct 1960 | A |
3288511 | Tavano | Nov 1966 | A |
3300239 | Dinkin | Jan 1967 | A |
3326588 | Clark | Jun 1967 | A |
3596958 | Bowerman | Aug 1971 | A |
3647165 | Whitla | Mar 1972 | A |
3691688 | Kaiserswerth | Sep 1972 | A |
3744833 | Berducone | Jul 1973 | A |
3790197 | Parker | Feb 1974 | A |
4364019 | Hutter | Dec 1982 | A |
4434524 | Gilchrist | Mar 1984 | A |
4505502 | Tomita | Mar 1985 | A |
4682801 | Cook et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
5485733 | Hoffman | Jan 1996 | A |
5771533 | Kuang-Pin | Jun 1998 | A |
5782512 | Cargnoni | Jul 1998 | A |
5944368 | Hastings | Aug 1999 | A |
6135515 | Roth et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6167589 | Luedtke | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6408484 | Vandertouw | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6489871 | Barton | Dec 2002 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3323993 | Jan 1985 | DE |
003837547 | May 1990 | DE |
0068988 | Jan 1983 | EP |
1179194 | May 1959 | FR |
205603 | Dec 1988 | GB |
54-13000 | Jan 1979 | JP |
3-193881 | Aug 1991 | JP |
404185880 | Jul 1992 | JP |
6-221045 | Aug 1994 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070267875 A1 | Nov 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10620804 | Jul 2003 | US |
Child | 11636722 | US | |
Parent | 10308109 | Dec 2002 | US |
Child | 10620804 | US |