REVERSIBLE POLAR DECOMPOSITION METHOD FOR BACKSCATTERING MUELLER MATRIX

Abstract

A reciprocal polar decomposition for a backscattering Mueller matrices, including the following steps: step 1, according to the reciprocity of forward light path and backward light path, transforming the Mueller matrix M of backscattering into a symmetric matrix QM; step 2, obtaining a diattenuator matrix MD1 by a matrix QMG; step 3, obtaining eigenvalues and eigenvectors through orthogonal decomposition; step 4, sorting the eigenvectors to obtain a depolarization matrix MΔd and a retarder matrix MR1; and step 5, obtaining polarization parameters by the obtained depolarization matrix MΔd and retarder matrix MR1. By using this decomposition, a systematic solution for decomposing the backscattering Mueller matrix is given firstly, and polarization parameters (such as an orientation angle, linear retarder, and depolarization) for characterizing a microstructure of a medium are obtained.

Description

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure particularly relates to a reciprocal polar decomposition for backscattering Mueller matrices.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Polarization imaging is a label-free non-destructive detection technology based on an interaction between polarized light and a medium, and microstructural information can be obtained from the medium or a biological tissue by polarization measurement. Due to the concurrence of scattering and polarization effects, 16 matrix elements of a Mueller matrix have different responses to the change of a polarization state, and there is a complex relationship among the matrix elements. It is necessary to decompose and transform the Mueller matrix to obtain parameters for characterizing various polarization characteristics of the medium. Decomposed sub-matrices and various coefficients can independently reflect a certain polarization property of the medium, and then characterize optical properties and a microstructure of the medium, which also provides the feasibility for imaging and detection. In biomedicine, Mueller matrix decomposition is used to determine a state of the tissue, monitor an optical process of the tissue, distinguish a cancerous tissue from normal tissues, analyze sources of tissue lesions, etc. In chemistry and materials science, it can be used to dynamically monitor structural changes and material growth in materials.

Currently, the most common decomposition is Lu-chipman polar decomposition which is published by Lu S Y and Chipman R A under the title of Interpretation of Mueller matrices based on polar decomposition in J.opt.soc.am.a in 1996, and this decomposition is widely used to analyze an interaction between polarized light and the medium. However, this decomposition is only applicable to forward scattering and is not suitable for backscattering. Compared with the forward scattering, the backscattering is more common, simpler in experimental conditions, and higher in practical value, while the backscattering Mueller matrix is more complex. How to decompose the backscattering Mueller matrix is critical for backscattering polarization imaging.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

For overcoming defects in the prior art, the objective of the present disclosure is to provide reciprocal polar decomposition for backscattering Mueller matrices.

In order to achieve the above-mentioned objective, the present disclosure provides reciprocal polar decomposition for backscattering Mueller matrices, including the following steps:

• • step 1, according to the relation between a diattenuator matrix and a retarder matrix of each of forward and backward paths, transforming the Mueller matrix M of backscattering into symmetric matrix QM,
  • step 2, obtaining a diattenuator matrix M_D1 by the matrix QMG;
  • step 3, obtaining eigenvalues and eigenvectors through orthogonal decomposition;
  • step 4, sorting the eigenvectors to obtain a depolarization matrix M_Δd and a retarder matrix M_R1; and
  • step 5, obtaining polarization parameters by the obtained depolarization matrix M_Δd and retarder matrix M_R1.

In step 1, the reciprocal polar decomposition decomposes the backscattering Mueller matrix into M=M_D2M_R2M_ΔdM_R1M_D1, wherein M_R1 is the retarder matrices in the forward path, M_D1 is the diattenuator matrices in the forward path, M_Δd is the depolarization matrix, M_R2 is the retarder matrices in the backward path, and M_D2 is the diattenuator matrices in the backward path;

• • according to the reciprocity of forward light path and backward light path, the diattenuator matrix and the retarder matrix of the backward path are represented by the diattenuator matrix and the phase retarder matrix of the forward path:

$M_{D2}=Q{M}_{D1}^{T}Q$ $M_{R2}=Q{M}_{R1}^{T}Q$

• • wherein Q=diag(1, 1, −1, 1);
  • the backscattering Mueller matrix is converted into the symmetric matrix according to

$\mathrm{QM}=M_{D1}^T{M}_{R1}^T{M}_{\Delta d}^{\prime }{M}_{R1}{M}_{D1},\mathrm{wherein}{M}_{D1}=\left(\begin{array}{cc}1& D^T\\ D& m_D\end{array}\right),M_{R1}=\left(\begin{array}{cc}1& 0^T\\ 0& m_R\end{array}\right),M_{\Delta d}^{\prime }={\mathrm{QM}}_{\Delta d}=\mathrm{diag}\left(d_0,d_1,-d_2,d_3\right),m_D=\sqrt{1-D^2}I+\left(1-\sqrt{1-D^2}\right)\hat{D}{\hat{D}}^T,$

• •  a diattenuator vector D has a length D, I is a 3×3 unit matrix,

$\hat{D}=D/❘D❘,{\left(m_R\right)}_{\mathrm{ij}}={\delta }_{\mathrm{ij}}\cos R+a_i{a}_j\left(1-\cos R\right)+{\sum }_{k=1}^3{\epsilon }_{\mathrm{ijk}}{a}_k\sin R,$

• •  δ_ij is a Kronecker function, ε_ijk is a Levi-Civita permutation symbol, R is a retarder, and

${\left(1,a_1,a_2,a_3\right)}^T={\left(1,{\hat{R}}^T\right)}^T$

• •  is a normalized Stokes vector of a fast axis.

The symmetry of the matrix QM is ensured according to

$QM=\frac{\left(QM+Q{M}^T\right)}{2}.$

In step 2,

$\left(QMG\right)\left(\begin{array}{c}1\\ D\end{array}\right)=d_0\left(1-D^2\right)\left(\begin{array}{c}1\\ D\end{array}\right)$

is obtained according to

$\left(\mathrm{QMG}\right)\left(M_{D1}G\right)=\left(1-D^2\right)M_{D1}^T\left(M_{R1}^{\prime }{M}_{R1}\right)=\left(1-D^2\right)M_{D1}^T{M}^{\prime },M^{\prime }=M_{R1}^T{M}_{\Delta d}^{\prime }{M}_{R1}=\left(\begin{array}{cc}{d}_0& 0^T\\ 0& m^{\prime }\end{array}\right),\mathrm{and}\mathrm{QM}=\frac{\left(\mathrm{QM}+{\mathrm{QM}}^T\right)}{2},$

the diattenuator vector D is obtained therefrom, and then, the retarder matrix M_D1 and M′ are obtained, wherein G=diag(1, −1, −1, −1).

In step 3,

$m_R^T\mathrm{diag}\left(d_1,-d_2,d_3\right)m_R=m^{\prime }$

is obtained according to

$\left(1-D^2\right)M_{D1}^{-1}={\mathrm{GM}}_{D1}G\mathrm{and}{M}^{\prime }=M_{R1}^T{M}_{\Delta d}^{\prime }{M}_{R1}=M_{D1}^{-1}{\mathrm{QMM}}_{D1}^{-1},$

and orthogonal decomposition is performed to obtain the eigenvalues and eigenvectors.

The obtained eigenvalues are sorted to obtain M_Δd and M_R1.

In the absence of known information of the medium, and on the premise that det(m_R)=1, an order is determined by adopting a strategy that an absolute value of a total retarder R is minimized, and taking smaller absolute values of optical rotation ψ and a linear retarder δ into accountretarderretarder, so that M_Δd and M_R1 are obtained.

The present disclosure has the beneficial effects: this decomposition not only provides a systematic method for decomposing the backscattering Mueller matrix, but also obtain polarization parameters (such as an orientation angle, retardance, and depolarization) for characterizing a microstructure of a medium.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The patent or application file contains at least one drawing executed in color. Copies of this patent or patent application publication with color drawing(s) will be provided by the Patent and Trademark Office upon request and payment of the necessary fee.

FIG. 1 is a diagram of specific steps in the present disclosure;

FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a beam path for backscattering polarization apparatus;

FIG. 3 is a diagram of a birefringent target of an experimental sample;

FIG. 4 is a comparison diagram of the orientation angles of the birefringent target in different directions obtained by forward scattering Lu-chipman polar decomposition, backscattering Lu-chipman polar decomposition, and backscattering reciprocal polar decomposition;

FIG. 5 is a comparison diagram of the linear retarder of the birefringent target in different directions obtained by forward scattering Lu-chipman polar decomposition, backscattering Lu-chipman polar decomposition, and backscattering reciprocal polar decomposition; and

FIG. 6 is a comparison diagram of depolarization of the birefringent target in different directions obtained by forward scattering Lu-chipman polar decomposition, backscattering Lu-chipman polar decomposition, and backscattering reciprocal polar decomposition.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present disclosure will be described clearly and completely below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in the embodiments of the present disclosure. Obviously, the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present disclosure, not all the embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present disclosure, all other embodiments obtained by those of ordinary skill in the art without creative work shall fall within the protection scope of the present disclosure.

It should be noted that all directional indications (such as upper, lower, left, right, front, rear . . . ) in the embodiments of the present disclosure are only intended to explain a relative position relation, movement conditions and the like among all components in a specific posture (as shown in the accompanying drawings), and if the specific posture is changed, the directional indications are also changed accordingly.

In the present disclosure, the terms “connection”, “fixation” and the like should be understood in a broad sense unless otherwise specified and defined, for example, “fixation” may be fixed connection or detachable connection or an integral whole, may be mechanical connection or electrical connection, may be direct connection or indirect connection through an intermediate medium, and may be internal connection of two elements or interaction between two elements, unless it may be clearly defined otherwise. For those of ordinary skill in the art, the specific meanings of the above terms in the present disclosure may be understood according to specific situations.

As shown in FIG. 1, the present disclosure provides reciprocal polar decomposition for backscattering Mueller matrices, including the following steps:

• • step 1, according to the relation between a diattenuator matrix and a retarder matrix of each of forward and backward paths, transforming the Mueller matrix M of backscattering into symmetric matrix QM;
  • step 2, a diattenuator matrix M_D1 is obtained by a matrix QMG (the matrix QMG is a product of the matrix QM and a matrix G);
  • step 3, obtaining eigenvalues and eigenvectors through orthogonal decomposition; step 4, sorting the eigenvalues to obtain a depolarization matrix M_Δd and a retarder matrix M_R1; and
  • step 5, obtaining polarization parameters by the obtained depolarization matrix M_Δd and retarder matrix M_R1.

In backscattering, the backscattering Mueller matrix M may be expressed as:

$\begin{array}{cc}M=M_{D2}{M}_{R2}{M}_{\Delta d}{M}_{R1}{M}_{D1}& \left(1\right)\end{array}$

wherein M_R1 is the retarder matrices in the forward path, M_D1 is the diattenuator matrices in the forward path, M_Δd is the depolarization matrix, M_R2 is the retarder matrices in the backward path, and M_D2 is the diattenuator matrices in the backward path;

• • the light path is reciprocal in backscattering. The diattenuator matrix and the retarder matrix of the backward path are represented by the diattenuator matrix and the retarder matrix of the forward path:

$$\begin{gathered} \begin{array}{cc}{M}_{D2}=Q{M}_{D1}^{T}Q\text{ \\ MR⁢2=Q⁢MR⁢1T⁢Q}& \left(2\right)\end{array} \end{gathered}$$

wherein Q=diag(1, 1, −1, 1);

• • the backscattering Mueller matrix is converted into the symmetric matrix according to a formula (3), and the symmetry of the matrix QM is ensured according to a formula (4):

$\begin{array}{cc}\mathrm{QM}=M_{D1}^T{M}_{R1}^T{M}_{\Delta d}^{\prime }{M}_{R1}{M}_{D1}& \left(3\right)\end{array}$ $\begin{array}{cc}\mathrm{QM}=\frac{\left(\mathrm{QM}+{\mathrm{QM}}^T\right)}{2}& \left(4\right)\end{array}$ $\begin{array}{cc}{M}_{D1}=\left(\begin{array}{cc}1& D^T\\ D& m_D\end{array}\right)& \left(5\right)\end{array}$ $\begin{array}{cc}{M}_{R1}=\left(\begin{array}{cc}1& 0^T\\ 0& m_R\end{array}\right)& \left(6\right)\end{array}$ $\begin{array}{cc}{M}_{\Delta d}^{\prime }={\mathrm{QM}}_{\Delta d}=\mathrm{diag}\left(d_0,d_1,-d_2,d_3\right)& \left(7\right)\end{array}$

wherein

$m_D=\sqrt{1-D^2}I+\left(1-\sqrt{1-D^2}\right)\hat{D}{\hat{D}}^T,$

I is a 3×3 unit matrix,

$\hat{D}=D/❘D❘,{\left(m_R\right)}_{\mathrm{ij}}={\delta }_{\mathrm{ij}}\cos R+a_i{a}_j\left(1-\cos R\right)+{\sum }_{k=1}^3{\epsilon }_{\mathrm{ij}}{a}_k\sin R,$

δ_ij is a Kronecker delta, ε_ijk is a Levi-Civita permutation symbol, R is a retarder, and

${\left(1,a_1,a_2,a_3\right)}^T={\left(1,{\hat{R}}^T\right)}^T$

is a normalized Stokes vector of a fast axis.

A formula (10) is obtained according to a formula (8), a formula (9) and a formula (4), there is only one positive eigenvalues (d₀(1−D²)) in the formula (10), a diattenuator vector D may be obtained according to relevant eigenvectors, and thus, the diattenuator matrix M_D1 is obtained:

$\begin{array}{cc}\left(QMG\right)\left(M_{D1}G\right)=\left(1-D^2\right)M_{D1}^T\left(M_{R1}^T{M}_{\Delta d}^{\prime }{M}_{R1}\right)=\left(1-D^2\right)M_{D1}^T{M}^{\prime }& \left(8\right)\end{array}$

$\begin{array}{cc}{M}^{\prime }=M_{R1}^T{M}_{\Delta d}^{\prime }{M}_{R1}=\left(\begin{array}{cc}{d}_0& 0^T\\ 0& m^{\prime }\end{array}\right)& \left(9\right)\end{array}$ $\begin{array}{cc}\left(\mathrm{QMG}\right)\left(\begin{array}{c}1\\ D\end{array}\right)=d_0\left(1-D^2\right)\left(\begin{array}{c}1\\ D\end{array}\right)& \left(10\right)\end{array}$

• • wherein G=diag(1, −1, −1, −1).
    • M′ is obtained according to a formula (11) and a formula (12), and then, the eigenvalues and eigenvectors are obtained by orthogonal decomposition according to a formula (13):

$\begin{array}{cc}\left(1-D^2\right)M_{D1}^{-1}={\mathrm{GM}}_{D1}G& \left(11\right)\end{array}$ $\begin{array}{cc}{M}^{\prime }=M_{R1}^{\prime }{M}_{\Delta d}^{\prime }{M}_{R1}=M_{D1}^{-1}{\mathrm{QMM}}_{D1}^{-1}& \left(12\right)\end{array}$ $\begin{array}{cc}{m}_R^T\mathrm{diag}\left(d_1,-d_2,d_3\right)m_R=m^{\prime }& \left(13\right)\end{array}$

The order of the above-mentioned feature values and the feature vectors which are obtained by decomposition and sign symbols of the feature vectors are undetermined, and therefore, the order and symbols of the feature values and the relevant feature vectors need to be determined. If there is known information about depolarization properties of a medium, the order and symbols of the feature vectors may be determined. In the absence of known information of the medium, and on the premise that det(m_R)=1, the order is determined by adopting a strategy that an absolute value of a total retarder R is minimized, and taking generally smaller optical rotation (i.e., a circular retarder) of a tissue sample and smaller absolute values of optical rotation W and a linear retarder S into account, so that M_Δd and M_R1 are obtained.

A linear retarder and an optical rotation effect may occur at the same time or in order; when they occur in order, an orientation angle θ, optical rotation ψ, a linear retarder δ and a depolarizationΔ are obtained according to formulae (14) to (19); and when they occur at the same time, a total retarder R, an orientation angle θ, optical rotation ψ and a linear retarder δ are obtained according to formulae (20) to (26).

$\begin{array}{cc}\psi =\frac{1}{2}\mathrm{atan}2\left(\frac{M_{R1}\left(2,3\right)-M_{R1}\left(3,2\right)}{M_{R1}\left(2,2\right)+M_{R1}\left(3,3\right)}\right)& \left(14\right)\end{array}$ $\begin{array}{cc}{M}_{\mathrm{CR}1}=\left(\begin{array}{cccc}1& 0& 0& 0\\ 0& \cos 2\psi & \sin 2\psi & 0\\ 0& -\sin 2\psi & \cos 2\psi & 0\\ 0& 0& 0& 1\end{array}\right)& \left(15\right)\end{array}$ $\begin{array}{cc}{M}_{\mathrm{LR}1}=M_{\mathrm{CR}1}^T{M}_{R1}& \left(16\right)\end{array}$ $\begin{array}{cc}\theta =\frac{1}{2}\mathrm{atan}2\left(M_{\mathrm{LR}1}\left(4,2\right)-M_{\mathrm{LR}1}\left(2,4\right),M_{\mathrm{LR}1}\left(3,4\right)-M_{\mathrm{LR}1}\left(4,3\right)\right)& \left(17\right)\end{array}$ $\begin{array}{cc}\delta ={\cos }^{-1}\left({\left\{{\left[M_{R1}\left(2,3\right)-M_{R1}\left(3,2\right)\right]}^2+{\left[M_{R1}\left(2,2\right)+M_{R1}\left(3,3\right)\right]}^2\right\}}^{\frac{1}{2}}-1\right)& \left(18\right)\end{array}$ $\begin{array}{cc}\Delta =1-\frac{1}{3}\left[\mathrm{tr}\left(❘\frac{M_{\Delta d}}{\left(M_{\Delta d}\right)}❘\right)-1\right]& \left(19\right)\end{array}$ $\begin{array}{cc}R={\cos }^{-1}\left(\frac{\mathrm{tr}\left(M_{R1}\right)}{2}-1\right)& \left(20\right)\end{array}$ $\begin{array}{cc}{r}_1=\frac{M_{R1}\left(3,4\right)-M_{R1}\left(4,3\right)}{2\sin R}& \left(21\right)\end{array}$ $\begin{array}{cc}{r}_2=\frac{M_{R1}\left(4,2\right)-M_{R1}\left(2,4\right)}{2\sin R}& \left(22\right)\end{array}$ $\begin{array}{cc}{r}_3=\frac{M_{R1}\left(2,3\right)-M_{R1}\left(3,2\right)}{2\sin R}& \left(23\right)\end{array}$ $\begin{array}{cc}\delta =R\sqrt{r_1^2+r_2^2}& \left(24\right)\end{array}$ $\begin{array}{cc}\psi =R\frac{r_3}{2}& \left(25\right)\end{array}$ $\begin{array}{cc}\theta =\frac{1}{2}\mathrm{atan}2\left(r_2,r_1\right)& \left(26\right)\end{array}$

wherein M_CR1 and M_LR1 are respectively a circular retarder matrix and a linear retarder matrix of M_R1.

The polarization imaging system is shown in FIG. 2. LED (633 nm) light passes through a polarizer (P, Thorlabs) and a quarter wave plate (QW1,Thorlabs) and is reflected to a sample by a thin-film beam splitter (BS, Thorlabs). Photons scattered from the sample are reflected by a reflecting mirror (M), pass through a quarter wave plate (QW2,Thorlabs), and are received by a polarization camera (PCCD, FLTR BFS-U3-51S5P-C). A Mueller matrix of each optical element is measured, and the interference of stray light is eliminated, so that a precise Mueller matrix is obtained.

In order to study the feasibility of reciprocal polar decomposition of the Mueller matrix in a backscattering geometry, an NBS 1963A birefringent resolution target (Thorlabs, R2L2S1B) is selected as the sample. As shown in FIG. 3, the target has a clear linear retarder and orientation angle. Select a red box area in (a), as shown in (b), and place targets in different directions to obtain orientation angle, linear retarder and depolarization by forward scattering Lu-chipman polar decomposition, backscattering Lu-chipman polar decomposition and backscattering reciprocal polar decomposition.

As shown in FIG. 4, three different directional targets were obtained through three different methods to obtain two-dimensional images of orientation angle, wherein (a), (b) and (c) are orientation angle of the three different methods for horizontally placing the target=, (d), (e) and (f) are orientation angle of the three different methods when rotating the target counterclockwise for 13° horizontally, and (g), (h) and (i) are orientation angle of the three different methods when rotating the target clockwise for 11° horizontally, and specific data are shown in Table 1.

As shown in FIG. 5, three different directional targets were obtained through three different methods to obtain two-dimensional linear retarder, wherein (a), (b) and (c) are linear retarder of the three different methods for horizontally placing the target, (d), (e) and (f) are linear retarder of the three different methods when rotating the target counterclockwise by 13° horizontally, (g), (h) and (i) are linear retarder of the three different methods when rotating the target clockwise by 11° horizontally, and specific data is shown in Table 2.

As shown in FIG. 6, three different directional targets were obtained through three different methods to obtain two-dimensional images of depolarization, wherein (a), (b) and (c) are depolarization of the three different methods for horizontally placing the target, (d), (e) and (f) are depolarization of the three different methods when rotating the target counterclockwise and horizontally placing it 13°, (g), (h) and (i) are depolarization of the three different methods when rotating the target clockwise and horizontally placing it 11°, and specific data is shown in Table 3.

Thorlabs provides data of a horizontally-placed NBS 1963A birefringent resolution target. As shown in Table 4, when the target is placed horizontally, the orientation angles and the linear retarder obtained by backward scattering reciprocal polar decomposition and forward scattering Lu-chipman polar decomposition are basically consistent with the data provided by the Thorlabs; when the target is placed 130 horizontally counterclockwise and 110 horizontally clockwise, the parameters of backscattering reciprocal polar decomposition and forward scattering Lu-chipman polar decomposition are basically consistent, while the results of backscattering Lu-chipman polar decomposition are erroneous.

From the experimental result, it can be clearly seen that the reciprocal polar decomposition of backscattering can not only obtain the correct orientation angle and linear retarder when placing in different directions, which shows the feasibility of the reciprocal polar decomposition of the Mueller matrix in the backscattering geometry, and can solve the problem of the backscattering Mueller matrix decomposition.

In each of the above-mentioned implementations, a backscattering Mueller matrix is converted into a symmetric matrix by the reciprocal polar decomposition of the backscattering Mueller matrix, a diattenuator matrix M_D is obtained by the matrix QMG, then, eigenvalues and eigenvectors are obtained by orthogonal decomposition, the eigenvectors and eigenvectors are sorted to obtain the depolarization matrix M_Δ and the retarder matrix M_R, and then, polarization parameters (such as an orientation angle, a linear retarder, and depolarization) having physical significance may be obtained. By using this decomposition, not only is the decomposition complexity of the backscattering Mueller matrix greatly lowered, but also the polarization parameters (such as the orientation angle, linear retarder, and depolarization) having physical significance may be obtained.

Table 1. Data of orientation angle obtained from targets in different directions by using different decompositions. #1: a horizontally-placed target, #2: the horizontally-placed target is rotated counterclockwise for 13°, #3: the horizontally-placed target is rotated clockwise for 110, θ_B: orientation angles of target lines, and θ_C: orientation angles of target backgrounds.

		Forward
		scattering	Backscattering
		Lu-Chipman	Lu-Chipman	Reciprocal
		polar	polar	polar
		decomposition	decomposition	decomposition
#1	θB (deg)	36.67 (0.59)	−59.85 (7.70)	35.35 (0.49)
	θC (deg)	1.67 (0.33)	85.67 (25.46)	0.10 (0.28)
#2	θB (deg)	50.81 (1.53)	−41.05 (0.92)	49.07 (1.10)
	θC (deg)	16.27 (0.33)	−76.84 (0.33)	14.12 (0.29)
#3	θB (deg)	23.47 (1.64)	−69.96 (0.82)	20.83 (0.90)
	θC (deg)	−11.56 (0.32)	76.05 (0.31)	−13.78 (0.27)

Table 2. Data of linear retarders obtained from targets in different directions by using different decompositions. #1: a horizontally-placed target, #2: the horizontally-placed target is rotated counterclockwise for 13°, #3: the horizontally-placed target is rotated clockwise for 11°, δ_B: linear retarders of target lines, and δ_C: linear retarders of target backgrounds.

		Forward
		scattering	Backscattering
		Lu-Chipman	Lu-Chipman	Reciprocal
		polar	polar	polar
		decomposition	decomposition	decomposition
#1	δB (rad)	2.448 (0.017)	1.344 (0.038)	2.471 (0.019)
	δC (rad)	2.370 (0.024)	1.436 (0.010)	2.429 (0.005)
#2	δB (rad)	2.465 (0.019)	1.353 (0.045)	2.467 (0.022)
	δC (rad)	2.396 (0.021)	1.417 (0.011)	2.433 (0.005)
#3	δB (rad)	2.419 (0.022)	1.354 (0.034)	2.466 (0.017)
	δC (rad)	2.348 (0.024)	1.467 (0.011)	2.407 (0.005)

Table 3. Data of depolarization obtained from targets in different directions by using different decompositions. #1: a horizontally-placed target, #2: the horizontally-placed target is rotated counterclockwise for 13°, #3: the horizontally-placed target is rotated clockwise for 11°, Δ_B: depolprization of target lines, and Δc depolarization of target backgrounds.

		Forward
		scattering	Backscattering
		Lu-Chipman	Lu-Chipman	Reciprocal
		polar	polar	polar
		decomposition	decomposition	decomposition
#1	ΔB	0.032 (0.018)	0.093 (0.036)	0.100 (0.036)
	ΔC	0.016 (0.015)	0.032 (0.010)	0.041 (0.009)
#2	ΔB	0.037 (0.024)	0.095 (0.040)	0.108 (0.041)
	ΔC	0.019 (0.016)	0.034 (0.009)	0.043 (0.009)
#3	ΔB	0.030 (0.018)	0.092 (0.041)	0.098 (0.039)
	ΔC	0.017 (0.016)	0.028 (0.011)	0.036 (0.010)

TABLE 4
Data of horizontally-placed birefringent target of Thorlabs
	θB (deg)	θC (deg)	δB (rad)	δC (rad)
	34.5 ± 4.3	0.1 ± 3.8	2.436 ± 0.084	2.383 ± 0.068

The embodiments should not be regarded as limitations on the present disclosure, however, any improvements made based on the spirit of the present disclosure shall fall within the protection scope of the present disclosure.

Claims

1. An imaging method based on a reciprocal polar decomposition for backscattering Mueller matrices, comprising the following steps: step 1, guiding an incident beam to a target to be measured through an optical component, and receiving a reflected beam of the incident beam by using a polarization camera to obtain a backscattering Mueller matrix of the optical component;step 2, according to the relation between a diattenuator matrix and a retarder matrix of each of forward and backward paths, transforming the Mueller matrix M backscattering into symmetric matrix QM;step 3, obtaining a diattenuator matrix MD1 by a matrix QMG;step 4, obtaining eigenvalues and eigenvectors through orthogonal decomposition;step 5, sorting the eigenvectors to obtain a depolarization matrix MΔd and a retarder matrix MR1; andstep 6, obtaining polarization parameters by the obtained depolarization matrix MΔd and retarder matrix MR1.

2. The imaging method based on the reciprocal polar decomposition for the backscattering Mueller matrices of claim 1, wherein in step 2, the reciprocal polar decomposition decomposes the backscattering Mueller matrix into M=MD2MR2MΔdMR1MD1, wherein MR1 is the retarder matrices in the forward path, MD1 is the diattenuator matrices in the forward path, MΔd is the depolarization matrix, MR2 is the retarder matrices in the backward path, and MD2 is the diattenuator matrices in the backward path; according to the reciprocity of forward light path and backward light path, the diattenuator matrix and the retarder matrix of the backward path are represented by the diattenuator matrix and the retarder matrix of the forward path:

3. The imaging method based on the reciprocal polar decomposition for the backscattering Mueller matrices of claim 2, wherein the symmetry of the matrix QM is ensured according to

4. The imaging method based on the reciprocal polar decomposition for the backscattering Mueller matrices of claim 2, wherein in step 3,

5. The imaging method based on the reciprocal polar decomposition for the backscattering Mueller matrices of claim 3, wherein in step 4,

6. The imaging method based on the reciprocal polar decomposition for the backscattering Mueller matrices of claim 5, wherein the obtained eigenvectors are sorted to obtain MΔd and MR1.

7. The imaging method based on the reciprocal polar decomposition for the backscattering Mueller matrices of claim 6, wherein in the absence of known information of the medium, and on the premise that det(mR)=1, an order is determined by adopting a strategy that an absolute value of a total retarder R is minimized, and taking smaller absolute values of optical rotation ψ and a linear retarder δ into account, so that MΔd and MR1 are obtained.