Reversible stiffening of light weight mesh

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9526603
  • Patent Number
    9,526,603
  • Date Filed
    Monday, October 1, 2012
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 27, 2016
    7 years ago
Abstract
An implant and a process for preparing such an implant are disclosed. The implant includes a mesh including a biodegradable polymeric coating having glass transition temperature of about 26° C. to about 36° C. The polymeric coating includes a first polymeric component including a lactone and a second polymeric component including a polyether. The first polymeric component is present in an amount from about 90% to about 99% of the polymeric coating and the second polymeric component is present in an amount from about 1% to about 10% of the polymeric coating.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure relates to coated implants. More particularly, the present disclosure relates to surgical meshes including a polymeric coating which stiffens the mesh for handling, and softens upon placement within the body.


BACKGROUND

Techniques for repairing damaged or diseased tissue are widespread in medicine. Wound closure devices, such as sutures and staples, as well as other repair devices like mesh or patch reinforcements, are frequently used for repair.


There has been a trend to reduce, for example, hernia mesh weight and stiffness as a means to reduce post operative complications and pain. A light weight mesh has a soft and pliant nature which conforms and flexes with movement of tissue. However, the reduction of mesh weight may make it hard to use, handle, and unfold the mesh during implantation, especially in a wet environment. Kinks and folds in the mesh are not acceptable, as they can create dead-spaces allowing seromas and fistulas to develop which can get infected, cause implant failure, and may cause a disease state to recur.


Coatings have been applied to medical devices to impart lubricious and/or anti-adhesive properties and serve as depots for bioactive agent release. However, these coatings do not improve the handling characteristics of meshes.


Improved coatings for meshes thus remain desirable.


SUMMARY

Accordingly, implants are described which include at least one surgical mesh containing a biodegradable polymeric coating. The biodegradable polymeric coating may contain a first polymeric component including a lactone present in an amount from about 90% to about 99% by weight of the polymeric coating and a second polymeric component including a polyether present in an amount from about 1% to about 10% by weight of the polymeric coating.


In embodiments, the biodegradable polymeric coating may have a glass transition temperature of from about 26° C. to about 36° C. In embodiments, the biodegradable polymeric coating has a glass transition temperature of about 30° C. to about 35° C.


In embodiments, the first polymeric component is selected from the group consisting of glycolide, lactide, p-dioxanone, ε-caprolactone, trimethylene caprolactone, orthoester, phosphoester, copolymers, and blends thereof. The first polymeric component may be a copolymer of glycolide and lactide. The glycolide may be present in an amount from about 10% to about 50% by weight of the copolymer and the lactide may be present in an amount from about 50% to about 90% by weight of the copolymer. The glycolide may be present in an amount from about 15% to about 40% by weight of the copolymer and the lactide may be present in an amount from about 60% to about 85% by weight of the copolymer. The second polymeric component may be selected from the group consisting of alkyl substituted ethylene oxides, polyalkylene oxides, alkylene glycols, polyethylene glycols, polytetramethylene ether glycol, and combinations thereof. For example, the second polymeric component is polyethylene glycol. In embodiments, the polyethylene glycol has a molecular weight from about 200 g/mol to about 1000 g/mol. In embodiments, the polyethylene glycol has a molecular weight from about 600 g/mol to about 900 g/mol.


The polyether may be a fatty acid diester of polyethylene glycol.


In embodiments, the polymeric coating comprises from about 95% to about 99% by weight of the first polymeric component and from about 1% to about 5% by weight of the second polymeric component. The polymeric coating may comprise from about 97% to about 99% by weight of the first polymeric component and from about 1% to about 3% by weight of the second polymeric component.


In embodiments, the mesh further includes a bioactive agent.


A process for coating a surgical mesh is further described, comprising:

    • preparing a solution by dissolving a first polymeric component comprising a lactone and a second polymeric component comprising a polyether in a solvent;
    • coating the surgical mesh with the solution to form a coated surgical mesh; and
    • drying the coated surgical mesh,
    • wherein the polymeric coating has a glass transition temperature of about 26° C. to about 36° C.


The first polymeric component may be selected from the group consisting of glycolide, lactide, p-dioxanone, ε-caprolactone, trimethylene caprolactone, orthoester, phosphoester, copolymers, and blends thereof. The second polymeric component may be selected from the group consisting of polyethers, alkyl substituted ethylene oxides, polyalkylene oxides, alkylene glycols, polytetramethylene ether glycol, and combinations thereof. The solvent may be selected from the group consisting of hexafluoroisopropanol, acetone, ethylene acetate, isopropanol, methylene chloride, chloroform, tetrahydrofuran, dimethyl formamide, n-methyl pyrrolidone, and combinations thereof.


In embodiments, the surgical mesh is coated by a process selected from the group consisting of spray coating, ultrasonic spray coating, electrospray coating, dip coating, solvent evaporation, and combinations thereof.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIGS. 1-12 illustrate differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) curves for polymeric blends in accordance with Example 1 of the present disclosure;



FIGS. 13-16 illustrate DSC curves for polymeric blends in accordance with Example 2 of the present disclosure;



FIGS. 17-19 illustrate DSC curves for polymeric blends in accordance with Example 3 of the present disclosure;



FIGS. 20-25 illustrate DSC curves for polymeric blends in accordance with Example 4 of the present disclosure; and



FIGS. 26-31 illustrate DSC curves for polymeric blends in accordance with Example 5 of the present disclosure.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Surgical meshes in accordance with the present disclosure are fabricated from a textile which provides the primary structure to the implants. The surgical meshes include a polymeric coating having a glass transition temperature above room temperature (i.e., above about 25° C.), but below body temperature (i.e., below about 37° C.). At room temperature, the coating stiffens the mesh for ease in handling and manipulation, and upon placement in the body, the coating will soften as the temperature rises above the glass transition temperature of the polymeric coating, thereby making the mesh pliable so that it conforms to tissue surfaces.


The surgical meshes are suitable for surgical repair of hernias and other surgical procedures requiring reinforcement or repair of soft tissue, such as muscle or wall tissue defects, pelvic organ prolapse, and urinary incontinence, for example. The meshes of the present disclosure can be in the form of sheets, patches, slings, suspenders, and other implants and composite materials such as pledgets, buttresses, wound dressings, drug delivery devices, and the like. The present surgical meshes may be implanted using open surgery or by a laparoscopic procedure.


A surgical mesh in accordance with the present disclosure may be fabricated from monofilament and/or multifilament yarns which may be made of any suitable biocompatible material. Suitable materials from which the mesh can be made should have the following characteristics: sufficient tensile strength to support tissue; sufficiently inert to avoid foreign body reactions when retained in the body for long periods of time; easily sterilized to prevent the introduction of infection when the mesh is implanted in the body; and sufficiently strong to avoid tearing of portions thereof, including any portion through which surgical fasteners may be applied to affix the mesh to tissue.


In some embodiments, the yarns include at least two filaments which may be arranged to create openings therebetween, the yarns also being arranged relative to each other to form openings in the mesh. Alternatively, the mesh may be formed from a continuous yarn that is arranged in loops that give rise to the openings in the mesh. The use of a mesh having yarns spaced apart in accordance with the present disclosure has the advantage of reducing the foreign body mass that is implanted in the body, while maintaining sufficient tensile strength to securely support the defect and tissue being repaired by the mesh. Moreover, the openings of the mesh of the present disclosure may be sized to permit fibroblast through-growth and ordered collagen laydown, resulting in integration of the mesh into the body. Thus, the spacing between the yarns may vary depending on the surgical application and desired implant characteristics as envisioned by those skilled in the art. Moreover, due to the variety of sizes of defects, and of the various fascia that may need repair, the mesh may be of any suitable size.


In embodiments in which at least two filaments form a yarn, the filaments may be drawn, oriented, crinkled, twisted, braided, commingled or air entangled to form the yarn. The resulting yarns may be braided, twisted, aligned, fused, or otherwise joined to form a variety of different mesh shapes. The yarns may be woven, knitted, interlaced, braided, or formed into a surgical mesh by non-woven techniques. The structure of the mesh will vary depending upon the assembling technique utilized to form the mesh, as well as other factors, such as the type of fibers used, the tension at which the yarns are held, and the mechanical properties required of the mesh.


In embodiments, knitting may be utilized to form a mesh of the present disclosure. Knitting involves, in embodiments, the intermeshing of yarns to form loops or inter-looping of the yarns. In embodiments, yarns may be warp-knitted thereby creating vertical interlocking loop chains, and/or yarns may be weft-knitted thereby creating rows of interlocking loop stitches across the mesh. In other embodiments, weaving may be utilized to form a mesh of the present disclosure. Weaving may include, in embodiments, the intersection of two sets of straight yarns, warp and weft, which cross and interweave at right angles to each other, or the interlacing of two yarns at right angles to each other. In some embodiments, the yarns may be arranged to form a net mesh which has isotropic or near isotropic tensile strength and elasticity.


In embodiments, the yarns may be nonwoven and formed by mechanically, chemically, or thermally bonding the yarns into a sheet or web in a random or systematic arrangement. For example, yarns may be mechanically bound by entangling the yarns to form the mesh by means other than knitting or weaving, such as matting, pressing, stitch-bonding, needlepunching, or otherwise interlocking the yarns to form a binderless network. In other embodiments, the yarns of the mesh may be chemically bound by use of an adhesive such as a hot melt adhesive, or thermally bound by applying a binder such as a powder, paste, or melt, and melting the binder on the sheet or web of yarns.


The yarns may be fabricated from any biodegradable and/or non-biodegradable polymer that can be used in surgical procedures. The term “biodegradable” as used herein is defined to include both bioabsorbable and bioresorbable materials. By biodegradable, it is meant that the material decomposes, or loses structural integrity under body conditions (e.g., enzymatic degradation or hydrolysis) or is broken down (physically or chemically) under physiologic conditions in the body, such that the degradation products are excretable or absorbable by the body. Absorbable materials are absorbed by biological tissues and disappear in vivo at the end of a given period, which can vary, for example, from hours to several months, depending on the chemical nature of the material. It should be understood that such materials include natural, synthetic, bioabsorbable, and/or certain non-absorbable materials, as well as combinations thereof.


Representative natural biodegradable polymers which may be used to form the yarns include: polysaccharides such as alginate, dextran, chitin, chitosan, hyaluronic acid, cellulose, collagen, gelatin, fucans, glycosaminoglycans, and chemical derivatives thereof (substitutions and/or additions of chemical groups including, for example, alkyl, alkylene, amine, sulfate, hydroxylations, carboxylations, oxidations, and other modifications routinely made by those skilled in the art); catgut; silk; linen; cotton; and proteins such as albumin, casein, zein, silk, soybean protein; and combinations such as copolymers and blends thereof, alone or in combination with synthetic polymers.


Synthetically modified natural polymers which may be used to form the yarns include cellulose derivatives such as alkyl celluloses, hydroxyalkyl celluloses, cellulose ethers, cellulose esters, nitrocelluloses, and chitosan. Examples of suitable cellulose derivatives include methyl cellulose, ethyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose, hydroxybutyl methyl cellulose, cellulose acetate, cellulose propionate, cellulose acetate butyrate, cellulose acetate phthalate, carboxymethyl cellulose, cellulose triacetate, cellulose sulfate sodium salt, and combinations thereof.


Representative synthetic biodegradable polymers which may be utilized to form yarns include polyhydroxy acids prepared from lactone monomers (such as glycolide, lactide, caprolactone, ε-caprolactone, valerolactone, and δ-valerolactone), carbonates (e.g., trimethylene carbonate, tetramethylene carbonate, and the like), dioxanones (e.g., 1,4-dioxanone and p-dioxanone), 1,dioxepanones (e.g., 1,4-dioxepan-2-one and 1,5-dioxepan-2-one), and combinations thereof. Polymers formed therefrom include: polylactides; poly(lactic acid); polyglycolides; poly(glycolic acid); poly(trimethylene carbonate); poly(dioxanone); poly(hydroxybutyric acid); poly(hydroxyvaleric acid); poly(lactide-co-(ε-caprolactone-)); poly(glycolide-co-(ε-caprolactone)); polycarbonates; poly(pseudo amino acids); poly(amino acids); poly(hydroxyalkanoate)s such as polyhydroxybutyrate, polyhydroxyvalerate, poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate), polyhydroxyoctanoate, and polyhydroxyhexanoate; polyalkylene oxalates; polyoxaesters; polyanhydrides; polyester anyhydrides; polyortho esters; and copolymers, block copolymers, homopolymers, blends, and combinations thereof.


Synthetic degradable polymers also include hydrophilic vinyl polymers expanded to include phosphoryl choline such as 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine, hydroxamates, vinyl furanones and their copolymers, and quaternary ammonia; as well as various alkylene oxide copolymers in combination with other polymers such as lactones, orthoesters, and hydroxybutyrates, for example.


Rapidly bioerodible polymers, such as poly(lactide-co-glycolide)s, polyanhydrides, and polyorthoesters, which have carboxylic groups exposed on the external surface as the surface of the polymer erodes, may also be used.


Other biodegradable polymers include polyphosphazenes; polypropylene fumarates; polyimides; polymer drugs such as polyamines; perfluoroalkoxy polymers; fluorinated ethylene/propylene copolymers; PEG-lactone copolymers; PEG-polyorthoester copolymers; blends and combinations thereof.


Some non-limiting examples of suitable nondegradable materials from which the mesh may be made include polyolefins such as polyethylene (including ultra high molecular weight polyethylene) and polypropylene including atactic, isotactic, syndiotactic, and blends thereof; polyethylene glycols; polyethylene oxides; polyisobutylene and ethylene-alpha olefin copolymers; fluorinated polyolefins such as fluoroethylenes, fluoropropylenes, fluoroPEGSs, and polytetrafluoroethylene; polyamides such as nylon, Nylon 6, Nylon 6,6, Nylon 6,10, Nylon 11, Nylon 12, and polycaprolactam; polyamines; polyimines; polyesters such as polyethylene terephthalate, polyethylene naphthalate, polytrimethylene terephthalate, and polybutylene terephthalate; polyethers; polybutester; polytetramethylene ether glycol; 1,4-butanediol; polyurethanes; acrylic polymers; methacrylics; vinyl halide polymers such as polyvinyl chloride; polyvinyl alcohols; polyvinyl ethers such as polyvinyl methyl ether; polyvinylidene halides such as polyvinylidene fluoride and polyvinylidene chloride; polychlorofluoroethylene; polyacrylonitrile; polyaryletherketones; polyvinyl ketones; polyvinyl aromatics such as polystyrene; polyvinyl esters such as polyvinyl acetate; etheylene-methyl methacrylate copolymers; acrylonitrile-styrene copolymers; ABS resins; ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymers; alkyd resins; polycarbonates; polyoxymethylenes; polyphosphazine; polyimides; epoxy resins; aramids; rayon; rayon-triacetate; spandex; silicones; and copolymers and combinations thereof.


The mesh may be a composite of layers, including a fibrous layer as described above, as well as porous and/or non-porous layers of fibers, foams, and/or films. A non-porous layer may retard or prevent tissue ingrowth from surrounding tissues, thereby acting as an adhesion barrier and preventing the formation of unwanted scar tissue. In embodiments, a reinforcement member may be included in the composite mesh. Suitable meshes, for example, include a collagen composite mesh such as PARIETEX™ (Tyco Healthcare Group LP, d/b/a Covidien, North Haven, Conn.). PARIETEX™ composite mesh is a 3-dimensional polyester weave with a resorbable collagen film bonded on one side. Examples of other meshes which may be utilized include those disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,596,002; 6,408,656; 7,021,086; 6,971,252; 6,695,855; 6,451,032; 6,443,964; 6,478,727; 6,391,060; and U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2007/0032805, the entire disclosures of each of which are incorporated by reference herein.


As noted above, the surgical mesh is coated, to cover at least some of the surfaces of the surgical mesh with a polymeric coating having a glass transition temperature of from about 26° C. to about 36° C. In embodiments, the glass transition temperature of the coating is about 30° C. to about 35° C. The polymeric coating may be formed from biodegradable polymers, such as those described above. In embodiments, suitable materials which may be utilized as a component of the polymeric coating in accordance with the present disclosure include homopolymers, copolymers, and/or blends possessing glycolide, lactide, p-dioxanone, ε-caprolactone, trimethylene caprolactone, orthoesters, phosphoesters, and various combinations of the foregoing. Methods for forming such copolymers are within the purview of those skilled in the art and include, for example, the methods disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,300,565 and 5,324,307, the entire disclosures of each of which are incorporated by reference herein.


In embodiments, glycolide and lactide based polyesters, especially copolymers of glycolide and lactide may be utilized. Suitable copolymers of lactide and glycolide may possess lactide in amounts from about 50% to about 90% by weight of the copolymer, in embodiments, from about 60% to about 85% by weight of the copolymer, with the glycolide being present in amounts from about 10% to about 50% by weight of the copolymer, in embodiments, from about 15% to about 40% by weight of the copolymer.


In embodiments, the biodegradable polymer or copolymer utilized for the coating, such as those described above, may be blended with plasticizers, diluents, or other polymers or additives to form the polymeric coating of the present disclosure. In embodiments, additional component(s) of the polymer coating may include a polyether such as alkylene oxides, including ethylene oxide and propylene oxide; alkyl substituted ethylene oxides such as ethyl, propyl, and butyl substituted ethylene oxide; polyalkylene oxides such as polyethylene oxide (“PEO”), polypropylene oxide (“PPO”), polyethylene oxide-co-polypropylene oxide (“PEO-PPO”), co-polyethylene oxide block or random copolymers; alkylene glycols including ethylene glycol and polyethylene glycol (“PEG”); polytetramethylene ether glycol, combinations thereof, and the like. In embodiments, a PEG with a weight average molecular weight of from about 200 to about 1,000 g/mol may be utilized. Suitable PEGs include those commercially available from a variety of sources under the designations PEG 200, PEG 400, PEG 600, PEG 900, and PEG 1000.


In some embodiments, the polymeric coating may contain a fatty acid component, such as a fatty acid or a fatty acid salt or a salt of a fatty acid ester. For example, a polyethylene glycol fatty acid ester, such as PEG monostearate, PEG monooleate, PEG distearate, and PEG diisostearate, may be utilized as a component of the polymeric coating.


In embodiments, a polymeric coating of the present disclosure may include from about 90% to about 99% by weight of the biodegradable polymer, e.g., a lactide/glycolide copolymer, with the additional polymeric component, e.g., a PEG, being present in an amount from about 1% to about 10% by weight of the polymeric coating. In embodiments, the polymeric coating may include from about 95% to about 99% by weight of the biodegradable polymer with the additional polymeric component being present in an amount from about 1% to about 5% by weight of the polymeric coating, and in some embodiments, the polymeric coating may include from about 97% to about 99% by weight of the biodegradable polymer with the additional polymeric component being present in an amount from about 1% to about 3% by weight of the polymeric coating.


To form the polymeric coating of the present disclosure, the polymers (or copolymers) may be dissolved in a suitable solvent to form a coating solution which may be applied to the surgical mesh. Biocompatible solvents include, for example, hexafluoroisopropanol, acetone, ethylene acetate, isopropanol, methylene chloride, chloroform, tetrahydrofuran, dimethyl formamide, n-methylpyrrolidone, combinations thereof, and other solvents within the purview of those skilled in the art which are volatile and non-damaging to the surgical mesh.


In embodiments, most of the accessible surfaces of the surgical mesh may be covered with the coating solution. In yet other embodiments, the entire surgical mesh is covered. The coating may cover from about 0.01% to about 100% of the area of the mesh, in embodiments from about 1% to about 90% of the area of the mesh, instill other embodiments from about 25% to about 50%. The amount of coating may also be by weight percent of the coated mesh, i.e., the coating may be present in an amount of from about 0.01% to about 75% by weight of the total weight of the mesh, in embodiments, from about 0.1% to about 50% by weight of the total weight of the mesh.


The coating solution may be applied to the surgical mesh by any means within the purview of those skilled in the art including: spray coating; ultrasonic spray coating; electrospray coating; solvent/immersion coating such as dipping; solvent evaporation; combinations thereof, and the like. In embodiments, the polymers may be dissolved in a solvent and the mesh may be dipped into and partially or completely submerged within the solution. Upon removal, the mesh is dried, thereby removing the solvent and depositing the polymer on the mesh. In other embodiments, the polymer blend may be sprayed onto the surface of the mesh via a spray nozzle. Alternatively, the polymeric coating may be applied to the fibers of the surgical mesh during extrusion, co-extrusion, pultrusion, and/or gel spinning, or the polymeric coating may be applied by melt coating or electrostatic coating, among other techniques within the purview of those skilled in the art.


Bioactive agents may be added to a surgical mesh of the present disclosure. A “bioactive agent”, as used herein, is used in its broadest sense and includes any substance or mixture of substances that have clinical use. Consequently, bioactive agents may or may not have pharmacological activity per se, e.g., a dye. Alternatively, a bioactive agent could be any agent which provides a therapeutic or prophylactic effect; a compound that affects or participates in tissue growth, cell growth and/or cell differentiation; a compound that may be able to invoke or prevent a biological action such as an immune response; or a compound that could play any other role in one or more biological processes. A variety of bioactive agents may be incorporated into the mesh. Moreover, any agent which may enhance tissue repair, limit the risk of sepsis, and modulate the mechanical properties of the mesh (e.g., the swelling rate in water, tensile strength, etc.) may be added during the preparation of the surgical mesh or may be coated on or into the openings of the mesh. The bioactive agent may be applied to the individual fibers of the surgical mesh or may be applied to the formed surgical mesh, or just one or more sides or portions thereof. In embodiments, the bioactive agent may be added to the polymeric coating.


Examples of classes of bioactive agents which may be utilized in accordance with the present disclosure include antimicrobials, analgesics, antipyretics, anesthetics, antiepileptics, antihistamines, anti-inflammatories, cardiovascular drugs, diagnostic agents, sympathomimetics, cholinomimetics, antimuscarinics, antispasmodics, hormones, growth factors, muscle relaxants, adrenergic neuron blockers, antineoplastics, immunogenic agents, immunosuppressants, gastrointestinal drugs, diuretics, steroids, lipids, lipopolysaccharides, polysaccharides, and enzymes. It is also intended that combinations of bioactive agents may be used.


Other bioactive agents which may be in the present disclosure include: local anesthetics; non-steroidal antifertility agents; parasympathomimetic agents; psychotherapeutic agents; tranquilizers; decongestants; sedative hypnotics; steroids; sulfonamides; sympathomimetic agents; vaccines; vitamins; antimalarials; anti-migraine agents; anti-parkinson agents such as L-dopa; anti-spasmodics; anticholinergic agents (e.g., oxybutynin); antitussives; bronchodilators; cardiovascular agents such as coronary vasodilators and nitroglycerin; alkaloids; analgesics; narcotics such as codeine, dihydrocodeinone, meperidine, morphine and the like; non-narcotics such as salicylates, aspirin, acetaminophen, d-propoxyphene and the like; opioid receptor antagonists such as naltrexone and naloxone; anti-cancer agents; anti-convulsants; anti-emetics; antihistamines; anti-inflammatory agents such as hormonal agents, hydrocortisone, prednisolone, prednisone, non-hormonal agents, allopurinol, indomethacin, phenylbutazone and the like; prostaglandins and cytotoxic drugs; estrogens; antibacterials; antibiotics; anti-fungals; anti-virals; anticoagulants; anticonvulsants; antidepressants; antihistamines; and immunological agents.


Other examples of suitable bioactive agents which may be included in the present disclosure include: viruses and cells; peptides, polypeptides and proteins, as well as analogs, muteins, and active fragments thereof; immunoglobulins; antibodies; cytokines (e.g., lymphokines, monokines, chemokines); blood clotting factors; hemopoietic factors; interleukins (IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, IL-6); interferons (β-IFN, (α-IFN and γ-IFN)); erythropoietin; nucleases; tumor necrosis factor; colony stimulating factors (e.g., GCSF, GM-CSF, MCSF); insulin; anti-tumor agents and tumor suppressors; blood proteins; gonadotropins (e.g., FSH, LH, CG, etc.); hormones and hormone analogs (e.g., growth hormone); vaccines (e.g., tumoral, bacterial and viral antigens); somatostatin; antigens; blood coagulation factors; growth factors (e.g., nerve growth factor, insulin-like growth factor); protein inhibitors; protein antagonists; protein agonists; nucleic acids such as antisense molecules, DNA, and RNA; oligonucleotides; and ribozymes.


The coated surgical mesh is left to dry or is dried in order to obtain the final implant. The material may be dried by heat or in a jet of sterile air if desired. After drying, the coated surgical mesh can be packaged and sterilized using conventional techniques, e.g., irradiation with beta (electronic irradiation) or gamma (irradiation using radioactive cobalt) rays.


EXAMPLES

The following Examples are being submitted to illustrate embodiments of the present disclosure. These Examples are intended to be illustrative only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure. Also, parts and percentages are by weight unless otherwise indicated. As used herein, “room temperature” refers to a temperature of from about 20° C. to about 25° C.


Example 1

Polymer films were formed using 70% L-Lactide/30% glycolide with PEG 200, PEG 600, or PEG 900. Solutions including a copolymer of 70% L-Lactide and 30% glycolide with PEG 200 (Sigma Aldrich), PEG 600 (Sigma Aldrich), or PEG 900 (Sigma Aldrich) in methylene chloride were prepared according to Table 1. The total end weight of each scintillation vial of solution was 20 grams (g) after the addition of the solvent.









TABLE 1







5% (w/w) Solution of MeCl2











Vial
Copolymer

Copolymer Mass (g)
PEG Mass (g)
















PEG 200




1
0.95
0.05
0.955
0.05


2
0.90
0.10
0.901
0.109


3
0.85
0.15
0.850
0.148


4
0.75
0.25
0.748
0.257




PEG 600


5
0.95
0.05
0.948
0.048


6
0.90
0.10
0.891
0.097


7
0.85
0.15
0.847
0.148


8
0.75
0.25
0.747
0.246




PEG 900


9
0.95
0.05
0.945
0.047


10
0.90
0.10
0.897
0.100


11
0.85
0.15
0.845
0.149


12
0.75
0.25
0.750
0.247









Each sample was prepared by placing the polymeric components into a vial with solvent and placing the vials on a shaker for about 3 hours until all components were dissolved. Films were then cast on plates of glass by adding approximately 5 ml of sample to the glass plates and placing the sample in a pre-heated oven set to about 40° C. to avoid phase separation. After heating for approximately 20 minutes, the samples were placed in a vacuum oven set at a temperature of about 45° C. The samples were allowed to further dry over about a 48 hour period. The films were then subjected to differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) with the glass transition temperature of each polymer blend in vials 1-12 depicted in FIGS. 1-12.


Implants of the invention may be manufactured by coating a surgical mesh with solutions of the present example and then drying the coated surgical mesh.


Example 2

Polymer films were prepared using 70% L-Lactide/30% glycolide with PEG 600 or PEG 900. Solutions including a copolymer of 70% L-Lactide and 30% glycolide with PEG 600 (Sigma Aldrich) or PEG 900 (Sigma Aldrich) in methylene chloride were prepared according to Table 2. The total end weight of each scintillation vial of solution was 20 grams (g).









TABLE 2







5% (w/w) Solution of MeCl2












Vial
Sample
Copolymer (g)










PEG 600 (g)



1
1%
0.986
0.010



2
3%
0.969
0.030






PEG 900 (g)



3
1%
0.988
0.011



4
3%
0.965
0.031










Each sample was allowed to mix for about 4 hours on a shaker before being cast on glass plates. The glass plates were placed over a water bath which was heated to about 50° C. Once the glass plates were warm to the touch, approximately 5 ml of sample were individually pipeted onto the glass plates and allowed to sit for about 10 minutes. The samples then sat in the hood for another 10 minutes and subsequently placed in a vacuum with the temperature set to about 45° C. The films were then subjected to differential scanning calorimetry, with the glass transition temperature of each polymer blend in vials 1-4 set forth in FIGS. 13-16.


Implants of the invention may be manufactured by coating a surgical mesh with solutions of the present example and then drying the coated surgical mesh.


Example 3

Polymer films were prepared using 70% L-Lactide/30% glycolide and PEG distearate. Solutions including a copolymer of 70% L-Lactide and 30% glycolide with PEG distearate (Sigma Aldrich) in methylene chloride were prepared according to Table 3. The total end weight of each scintillation vial of solution was 20 grams (g).









TABLE 3







5% (w/w) Solution of MeCl2












Vial
Sample
Copolymer (g)
PEG distearate (g)







1
1%
0.993
0.009



2
3%
0.967
0.030



3
5%
0.947
0.052










Each solution was allowed to mix for about 4 hours on a shaker before being cast on glass plates. The glass plates were placed over a water bath which was heated to about 50° C. Once the glass plates were warm to the touch, approximately 5 ml of sample were individually pipeted onto glass plates and allowed to sit for about 10 minutes over the bath, followed by another 20 minutes in the hood. The samples were then placed in a vacuum with the temperature set to about 45° C. The films were then subjected to differential scanning calorimetry, with the glass transition temperature of each polymer blend in vials 1-3 set forth in FIGS. 17-19.


Implants of the invention may be manufactured by coating a surgical mesh with solutions of the present example and then drying the coated surgical mesh.


Example 4

Polymer films were prepared using 70% L-Lactide/30% glycolide with PEG distearate or PEG 900. Solutions including a copolymer of 70% L-Lactide and 30% glycolide with PEG distearate (Sigma Aldrich) or PEG 900 (Sigma Aldrich) in methylene chloride were prepared according to Table 4. The total end weight of each scintillation vial of solution was 20 grams (g).









TABLE 4







5% (w/w) Solution of MeCl2












Vial
Sample
Copolymer (g)










PEG distearate (g)



1
1%
0.988
0.012



2
1.5%  
0.985
0.015



3
2%
0.982
0.022






PEG 900 (g)



4
1%
0.988
0.011



5
2%
0.979
0.021



6
3%
0.968
0.031










Each sample was placed on a shaker for about 48 hours until all components were completely dissolved. Glass plates were placed over a water bath which was heated to about 50° C. Once the glass plates were warm to the touch, approximately 5 ml of sample were individually pipeted onto glass plates and allowed to sit for about 10 minutes. The samples then sat in the hood for another 20 minutes and subsequently placed in a vacuum with the temperature set to about 40° C. Vacuum was pulled and the samples were left overnight. Samples were then removed from the vacuum oven and placed in a dry box for about 24 hours. The films were then subject to differential scanning calorimetry, with the glass transition temperature of each polymer blend in vials 1-6 set forth in FIGS. 20-25.


Implants of the invention may be manufactured by coating a surgical mesh with solutions of the present example and then drying the coated surgical mesh.


Example 5

Polymer films were formed using 82% L-Lactide/18% glycolide and PEG 900 or PEG distearate. Solutions including a copolymer of 82% L-Lactide and 18% glycolide with PEG 900 (Sigma Aldrich) and PEG distearate (Sigma Aldrich) in methylene chloride were prepared according to Table 5. The total end weight of each scintillation vial of solution was 20 grams (g).









TABLE 5







5% (w/w) Solution of MeCl2












Vial
Sample
Copolymer (g)










PEG 900 (g)



1
1%
0.991
0.011



2
3%
0.968
0.031



3
5%
0.951
0.050






PEG distearate (g)



4
1%
0.989
0.011



5
3%
0.974
0.032



6
5%
0.950
0.052










Each sample was placed on a shaker to mix overnight to allow the components to dissolve. Glass plates were placed over a water bath which was heated to about 50° C. Once the glass plates were warm to the touch, approximately 5 ml of sample were individually pipeted onto glass plates and allowed to sit for about 10 minutes. The samples then sat in the hood for another 20 to 30 minutes and subsequently placed in a vacuum with the temperature set to about 40° C. and left overnight. Samples were then removed from the vacuum oven and placed in a dry box for about 24 hours. The films were then subject to differential scanning calorimetry, with the glass transition temperature of each polymer blend in vials 1-6 set forth in FIGS. 26-31.


Implants of the invention may be manufactured by coating a surgical mesh with solutions of the present example and then drying the coated surgical mesh.


It will be understood that various modifications may be made to the embodiments disclosed herein. Therefore, the above description should not be construed as limiting, but merely as an exemplification of illustrative embodiments. Those skilled in the art will envision other modifications within the scope and spirit of the present disclosure. Such modifications and variations are intended to come within the scope of the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. An implant comprising: a mesh including a biodegradable polymeric coating, the biodegradable polymeric coating comprising: a first polymeric component including a lactone present in an amount from about 90% to about 99% by weight of the polymeric coating; anda second polymeric component including a fatty acid diester of polyethylene glycol present in an amount from about 1% to about 10% by weight of the polymeric coating,wherein the biodegradable polymeric coating has a glass transition temperature of from about 26° C. to about 36° C.
  • 2. The implant of claim 1, wherein the biodegradable polymeric coating has a glass transition temperature of about 30° C. to about 35° C.
  • 3. The implant of claim 1, wherein the first polymeric component is selected from the group consisting of glycolide, lactide, p-dioxanone, ε-caprolactone, trimethylene caprolactone, orthoester, phosphoester, copolymers, and blends thereof.
  • 4. The implant of claim 1, wherein the first polymeric component is a copolymer of glycolide and lactide.
  • 5. The implant of claim 4, wherein glycolide is present in an amount from about 10% to about 50% by weight of the copolymer and lactide is present in an amount from about 50% to about 90% by weight of the copolymer.
  • 6. The implant of claim 4, wherein glycolide is present in an amount from about 15% to about 40% by weight of the copolymer and lactide is present in an amount from about 60% to about 85% by weight of the copolymer.
  • 7. The implant of claim 1, wherein the polyethylene glycol has a molecular weight from about 200 g/mol to about 1000 g/mol.
  • 8. The implant of claim 1, wherein the polyethylene glycol has a molecular weight from about 600 g/mol to about 900 g/mol.
  • 9. The implant of claim 1, wherein the polymeric coating comprises from about 95% to about 99% by weight of the first polymeric component and from about 1% to about 5% by weight of the second polymeric component.
  • 10. The implant of claim 1, wherein the polymeric coating comprises from about 97% to about 99% by weight of the first polymeric component and from about 1% to about 3% by weight of the second polymeric component.
  • 11. The implant of claim 1, wherein the mesh further includes a bioactive agent.
  • 12. A process for coating a surgical mesh comprising: preparing a solution by dissolving a first polymeric component comprising a lactone and a second polymeric component comprising a fatty acid diester of polyethylene glycol in a solvent;coating the surgical mesh with the solution to form a polymeric coating on the surgical mesh; and drying the polymeric coating on the surgical mesh,wherein the lactone is present in the polymeric coating in an amount from about 90% to about 99% by weight of the polymeric coating, the fatty acid diester of polyethylene glycol is present in an amount from about 1% to about 10% by weight of the polymeric coating, and the polymeric coating has a glass transition temperature of about 26° C. to about 36° C.
  • 13. The process of claim 12, wherein the first polymeric component is selected from the group consisting of glycolide, lactide, p-dioxanone, ε-caprolactone, trimethylene caprolactone, orthoester, phosphoester, copolymers, and blends thereof.
  • 14. The process of claim 12, wherein the solvent is selected from the group consisting of hexafluoroisopropanol, acetone, ethylene acetate, isopropanol, methylene chloride, chloroform, tetrahydrofuran, dimethyl formamide, n-methyl pyrrolidone, and combinations thereof.
  • 15. The process of claim 12, wherein the surgical mesh is coated by a process selected from the group consisting of spray coating, ultrasonic spray coating, electrospray coating, dip coating, solvent evaporation, and combinations thereof.
  • 16. The process of claim 12, wherein the polymeric coating comprises from about 95% to about 99% by weight of the first polymeric component and from about 1% to about 5% by weight of the second polymeric component.
  • 17. The process of claim 12, wherein the polymeric coating comprises from about 97% to about 99% by weight of the first polymeric component and from about 1% to about 3% by weight of the second polymeric component.
  • 18. The process of claim 12, wherein the polymeric coating further includes a bioactive agent.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a National Stage Application of PCT/IB12/002579 under 35 USC §371(a), which claims priority of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Serial No. 61/541,610 filed Sep. 30, 2011, the disclosures of each of the above-identified applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.

PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/IB2012/002579 10/1/2012 WO 00
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2013/046058 4/4/2013 WO A
US Referenced Citations (331)
Number Name Date Kind
1187158 Mcginley Jun 1916 A
3118294 Van Laethem Jan 1964 A
3124136 Usher Mar 1964 A
3272204 Charles et al. Sep 1966 A
3276448 Usher Oct 1966 A
3320649 Naimer May 1967 A
3364200 Ashton et al. Jan 1968 A
3570482 Emoto et al. Mar 1971 A
4006747 Kronenthal et al. Feb 1977 A
4060081 Yannas et al. Nov 1977 A
4173131 Pendergrass et al. Nov 1979 A
4193137 Heck Mar 1980 A
4248064 Odham Feb 1981 A
4294241 Miyata Oct 1981 A
4300565 Rosensaft et al. Nov 1981 A
4307717 Hymes et al. Dec 1981 A
4338800 Matsuda Jul 1982 A
4476697 Schafer et al. Oct 1984 A
4487865 Balazs et al. Dec 1984 A
4500676 Balazs et al. Feb 1985 A
4511653 Play et al. Apr 1985 A
4527404 Nakagaki et al. Jul 1985 A
4591501 Cioca May 1986 A
4597762 Walter et al. Jul 1986 A
4603695 Ikada et al. Aug 1986 A
4631932 Sommers Dec 1986 A
4670014 Huc et al. Jun 1987 A
4709562 Matsuda Dec 1987 A
4748078 Doi et al. May 1988 A
4759354 Quarfoot Jul 1988 A
4769038 Bendavid et al. Sep 1988 A
4796603 Dahlke et al. Jan 1989 A
4813942 Alvarez Mar 1989 A
4841962 Berg et al. Jun 1989 A
4854316 Davis Aug 1989 A
4925294 Geshwind et al. May 1990 A
4931546 Tardy et al. Jun 1990 A
4942875 Hlavacek et al. Jul 1990 A
4948540 Nigam Aug 1990 A
4950483 Ksander et al. Aug 1990 A
4970298 Silver et al. Nov 1990 A
5002551 Linsky et al. Mar 1991 A
5147374 Fernandez Sep 1992 A
5162430 Rhee et al. Nov 1992 A
5171273 Silver et al. Dec 1992 A
5176692 Wilk et al. Jan 1993 A
5192301 Kamiya et al. Mar 1993 A
5196185 Silver et al. Mar 1993 A
5201745 Tayot et al. Apr 1993 A
5201764 Kelman et al. Apr 1993 A
5206028 Li Apr 1993 A
5217493 Raad et al. Jun 1993 A
5254133 Seid Oct 1993 A
5256418 Kemp et al. Oct 1993 A
5263983 Yoshizato et al. Nov 1993 A
5304595 Rhee et al. Apr 1994 A
5306500 Rhee et al. Apr 1994 A
5324307 Jarrett et al. Jun 1994 A
5324775 Rhee et al. Jun 1994 A
5328955 Rhee et al. Jul 1994 A
5334527 Brysk Aug 1994 A
5339657 McMurray Aug 1994 A
5350583 Yoshizato et al. Sep 1994 A
5356432 Rutkow et al. Oct 1994 A
5368549 McVicker Nov 1994 A
5376375 Rhee et al. Dec 1994 A
5376376 Li Dec 1994 A
5397331 Himpens et al. Mar 1995 A
5399361 Song et al. Mar 1995 A
5413791 Rhee et al. May 1995 A
5425740 Hutchinson, Jr. Jun 1995 A
5428022 Palefsky et al. Jun 1995 A
5433996 Kranzler et al. Jul 1995 A
5441491 Verschoor et al. Aug 1995 A
5441508 Gazielly et al. Aug 1995 A
5456693 Conston et al. Oct 1995 A
5456711 Hudson Oct 1995 A
5466462 Rosenthal et al. Nov 1995 A
5480644 Freed Jan 1996 A
5487895 Dapper et al. Jan 1996 A
5490984 Freed Feb 1996 A
5512291 Li Apr 1996 A
5512301 Song et al. Apr 1996 A
5514181 Light et al. May 1996 A
5522840 Krajicek Jun 1996 A
5523348 Rhee et al. Jun 1996 A
5536656 Kemp et al. Jul 1996 A
5543441 Rhee et al. Aug 1996 A
5565210 Rosenthal et al. Oct 1996 A
5567806 Abdul-Malak et al. Oct 1996 A
5569273 Titone et al. Oct 1996 A
RE35399 Eisenberg Dec 1996 E
5593441 Lichtenstein et al. Jan 1997 A
5595621 Light et al. Jan 1997 A
5601571 Moss Feb 1997 A
5607474 Athanasiou et al. Mar 1997 A
5607590 Shimizu Mar 1997 A
5614587 Rhee et al. Mar 1997 A
5618551 Tardy et al. Apr 1997 A
5634931 Kugel Jun 1997 A
5639796 Lee Jun 1997 A
5665391 Lea Sep 1997 A
5667839 Berg Sep 1997 A
5681568 Goldin et al. Oct 1997 A
5686115 Vournakis et al. Nov 1997 A
5690675 Sawyer et al. Nov 1997 A
5695525 Mulhauser et al. Dec 1997 A
5697978 Sgro Dec 1997 A
5700476 Rosenthal et al. Dec 1997 A
5700477 Rosenthal et al. Dec 1997 A
5709934 Bell et al. Jan 1998 A
5716409 Debbas Feb 1998 A
5720981 Eisinger Feb 1998 A
5732572 Litton Mar 1998 A
5749895 Sawyer et al. May 1998 A
5752974 Rhee et al. May 1998 A
5766246 Mulhauser et al. Jun 1998 A
5766631 Arnold Jun 1998 A
5769864 Kugel Jun 1998 A
5771716 Schlussel Jun 1998 A
5785983 Furlan et al. Jul 1998 A
5800541 Rhee et al. Sep 1998 A
5814328 Gunasekaran Sep 1998 A
5833705 Ken et al. Nov 1998 A
5840011 Landgrebe et al. Nov 1998 A
5861034 Taira et al. Jan 1999 A
5863984 Doillon et al. Jan 1999 A
5869080 McGregor et al. Feb 1999 A
5871767 Dionne et al. Feb 1999 A
5876444 Lai Mar 1999 A
5891558 Bell et al. Apr 1999 A
5899909 Claren et al. May 1999 A
5906937 Sugiyama et al. May 1999 A
5910149 Kuzmak Jun 1999 A
5911731 Pham et al. Jun 1999 A
5916225 Kugel Jun 1999 A
5919232 Chaffringeon et al. Jul 1999 A
5919233 Knopf et al. Jul 1999 A
5922026 Chin Jul 1999 A
5931165 Reich et al. Aug 1999 A
5942278 Hagedorn et al. Aug 1999 A
5962136 Dewez et al. Oct 1999 A
5972022 Huxel Oct 1999 A
RE36370 Li Nov 1999 E
5993844 Abraham et al. Nov 1999 A
5994325 Roufa et al. Nov 1999 A
5997895 Narotam et al. Dec 1999 A
6001895 Harvey et al. Dec 1999 A
6008292 Lee et al. Dec 1999 A
6015844 Harvey et al. Jan 2000 A
6039686 Kovac Mar 2000 A
6042534 Gellman et al. Mar 2000 A
6042592 Schmitt Mar 2000 A
6043089 Sugiyama et al. Mar 2000 A
6051425 Morota et al. Apr 2000 A
6056688 Benderev et al. May 2000 A
6056970 Greenawalt et al. May 2000 A
6057148 Sugiyama et al. May 2000 A
6063396 Kelleher May 2000 A
6066776 Goodwin et al. May 2000 A
6066777 Benchetrit May 2000 A
6071292 Makower et al. Jun 2000 A
6077281 Das Jun 2000 A
6080194 Pachence et al. Jun 2000 A
6083522 Chu et al. Jul 2000 A
6120539 Eldridge et al. Sep 2000 A
6132765 DiCosmo et al. Oct 2000 A
6143037 Goldstein et al. Nov 2000 A
6153292 Bell et al. Nov 2000 A
6165488 Tardy et al. Dec 2000 A
6171318 Kugel et al. Jan 2001 B1
6174320 Kugel et al. Jan 2001 B1
6176863 Kugel et al. Jan 2001 B1
6179872 Bell et al. Jan 2001 B1
6197325 MacPhee et al. Mar 2001 B1
6197934 DeVore et al. Mar 2001 B1
6197935 Doillon et al. Mar 2001 B1
6210439 Firmin et al. Apr 2001 B1
6221109 Geistlich et al. Apr 2001 B1
6224616 Kugel May 2001 B1
6241768 Agarwal et al. Jun 2001 B1
6258124 Darois et al. Jul 2001 B1
6262332 Ketharanathan Jul 2001 B1
6264702 Ory et al. Jul 2001 B1
6267772 Mulhauser et al. Jul 2001 B1
6277397 Shimizu Aug 2001 B1
6280453 Kugel et al. Aug 2001 B1
6287316 Agarwal et al. Sep 2001 B1
6290708 Kugel et al. Sep 2001 B1
6306424 Vyakarnam et al. Oct 2001 B1
6312474 Francis et al. Nov 2001 B1
6328686 Kovac Dec 2001 B1
6334872 Termin et al. Jan 2002 B1
6383201 Dong May 2002 B1
6391060 Ory et al. May 2002 B1
6391333 Li et al. May 2002 B1
6391939 Tayot et al. May 2002 B2
6408656 Ory et al. Jun 2002 B1
6410044 Chudzik et al. Jun 2002 B1
6413742 Olsen et al. Jul 2002 B1
6428978 Olsen et al. Aug 2002 B1
6436030 Rehil Aug 2002 B2
6440167 Shimizu Aug 2002 B2
6443964 Ory et al. Sep 2002 B1
6447551 Goldmann Sep 2002 B1
6447802 Sessions et al. Sep 2002 B2
6448378 DeVore et al. Sep 2002 B2
6451032 Ory et al. Sep 2002 B1
6451301 Sessions et al. Sep 2002 B1
6454787 Maddalo et al. Sep 2002 B1
6477865 Matsumoto Nov 2002 B1
6478727 Scetbon Nov 2002 B2
6479072 Morgan et al. Nov 2002 B1
6500464 Ceres et al. Dec 2002 B2
6509031 Miller et al. Jan 2003 B1
6511958 Atkinson et al. Jan 2003 B1
6514286 Leatherbury et al. Feb 2003 B1
6514514 Atkinson et al. Feb 2003 B1
6540773 Dong Apr 2003 B2
6541023 Andre et al. Apr 2003 B1
6548077 Gunasekaran Apr 2003 B1
6554855 Dong Apr 2003 B1
6559119 Burgess et al. May 2003 B1
6566345 Miller et al. May 2003 B2
6575988 Rousseau Jun 2003 B2
6576019 Atala Jun 2003 B1
6596002 Therin et al. Jul 2003 B2
6596304 Bayon et al. Jul 2003 B1
6599323 Melican et al. Jul 2003 B2
6599524 Li et al. Jul 2003 B2
6599690 Abraham et al. Jul 2003 B1
6613348 Jain Sep 2003 B1
6623963 Muller et al. Sep 2003 B1
6630414 Matsumoto Oct 2003 B1
6638284 Rousseau et al. Oct 2003 B1
6652594 Francis et al. Nov 2003 B2
6653450 Berg et al. Nov 2003 B1
6656206 Corcoran et al. Dec 2003 B2
6660280 Allard et al. Dec 2003 B1
6669735 Pelissier Dec 2003 B1
6682760 Noff et al. Jan 2004 B2
6685714 Rousseau Feb 2004 B2
6695855 Gaston Feb 2004 B1
6706684 Bayon et al. Mar 2004 B1
6706690 Reich et al. Mar 2004 B2
6719795 Cornwall et al. Apr 2004 B1
6723335 Moehlenbruck et al. Apr 2004 B1
6730299 Tayot et al. May 2004 B1
6743435 DeVore et al. Jun 2004 B2
6755868 Rousseau Jun 2004 B2
6773723 Spiro et al. Aug 2004 B1
6790213 Cherok et al. Sep 2004 B2
6790454 Abdul Malak et al. Sep 2004 B1
6800082 Rousseau Oct 2004 B2
6833408 Sehl et al. Dec 2004 B2
6835336 Watt Dec 2004 B2
6852330 Bowman et al. Feb 2005 B2
6869938 Schwartz et al. Mar 2005 B1
6893653 Abraham et al. May 2005 B2
6896904 Spiro et al. May 2005 B2
6936276 Spiro et al. Aug 2005 B2
6939562 Spiro et al. Sep 2005 B2
6949625 Tayot Sep 2005 B2
6966918 Schuldt-Hempe et al. Nov 2005 B1
6971252 Therin et al. Dec 2005 B2
6974679 Andre et al. Dec 2005 B2
6974862 Ringeisen et al. Dec 2005 B2
6977231 Matsuda Dec 2005 B1
6988386 Okawa et al. Jan 2006 B1
7021086 Ory et al. Apr 2006 B2
7025063 Snitkin et al. Apr 2006 B2
7041868 Greene et al. May 2006 B2
RE39172 Bayon et al. Jul 2006 E
7098315 Schaufler Aug 2006 B2
7175852 Simmoteit et al. Feb 2007 B2
7192604 Brown et al. Mar 2007 B2
7207962 Anand et al. Apr 2007 B2
7214765 Ringeisen et al. May 2007 B2
7226611 Yura et al. Jun 2007 B2
7229453 Anderson et al. Jun 2007 B2
7594921 Browning Sep 2009 B2
7670380 Cauthen, III Mar 2010 B2
20010008930 Tayot et al. Jul 2001 A1
20020095218 Carr et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020116070 Amara et al. Aug 2002 A1
20030013989 Obermiller et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030023316 Brown et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030086975 Ringeisen May 2003 A1
20030100954 Schuldt-Hempe et al. May 2003 A1
20030114937 Leatherbury et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030133967 Ruszczak et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030212460 Darois et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030225355 Butler Dec 2003 A1
20030232746 Lamberti et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040034373 Schuldt-Hempe et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040054406 Dubson et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040059356 Gingras Mar 2004 A1
20040101546 Gorman et al. May 2004 A1
20040138762 Therin et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040172048 Browning Sep 2004 A1
20040215219 Eldridge et al. Oct 2004 A1
20050002893 Goldmann Jan 2005 A1
20050010306 Priewe et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050021058 Negro Jan 2005 A1
20050085924 Darois et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050113849 Popadiuk et al. May 2005 A1
20050113938 Jamiolkowski et al. May 2005 A1
20050137512 Campbell et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050142161 Freeman et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050148963 Brennan Jul 2005 A1
20050175659 Macomber et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050228408 Fricke et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050232979 Shoshan Oct 2005 A1
20050244455 Greenawalt Nov 2005 A1
20050267521 Forsberg Dec 2005 A1
20050288691 Leiboff Dec 2005 A1
20060094318 Matsuda et al. May 2006 A1
20060135921 Wiercinski et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060147501 Hillas et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060167561 Odar et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060193884 Stopek Aug 2006 A1
20060216320 Kitazono et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060252981 Matsuda et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070031474 Tayot Feb 2007 A1
20070032805 Therin et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070161109 Archibald et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070280990 Stopek Dec 2007 A1
20070297987 Stad et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070299538 Roeber Dec 2007 A1
20090005867 Lefranc et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090239786 Stopek Sep 2009 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (92)
Number Date Country
1317836 May 1993 CA
19544162 Apr 1997 DE
10019604 Oct 2001 DE
10043396 Jun 2002 DE
0194192 Sep 1986 EP
0248544 Dec 1987 EP
0276890 Aug 1988 EP
0372969 Jun 1990 EP
544485 Jun 1993 EP
0552576 Jul 1993 EP
614650 Sep 1994 EP
0621014 Oct 1994 EP
0625891 Nov 1994 EP
0637452 Feb 1995 EP
0705878 Apr 1996 EP
0719527 Jul 1996 EP
0774240 May 1997 EP
0797962 Oct 1997 EP
827724 Mar 1998 EP
0836838 Apr 1998 EP
0895762 Feb 1999 EP
898944 Mar 1999 EP
1017415 Jul 2000 EP
1052319 Nov 2000 EP
1055757 Nov 2000 EP
1 216 717 Jun 2002 EP
1 216 718 Jun 2002 EP
0693523 Nov 2002 EP
1315468 Jun 2003 EP
1382728 Jan 2004 EP
1484070 Dec 2004 EP
1561480 Aug 2005 EP
1669093 Jun 2006 EP
1782848 May 2007 EP
2244853 Apr 1975 FR
2257262 Aug 1975 FR
2 308 349 Nov 1976 FR
2453231 Oct 1980 FR
2715405 Jul 1995 FR
2 724 563 Mar 1996 FR
2744906 Aug 1997 FR
2766698 Feb 1999 FR
2771622 Jun 1999 FR
2779937 Dec 1999 FR
2859624 Mar 2005 FR
2863277 Jun 2005 FR
2884706 Oct 2006 FR
2 051 153 Jan 1981 GB
H0332677 Feb 1991 JP
H05237128 Sep 1993 JP
H09137380 May 1997 JP
8902445 Mar 1989 WO
8908467 Sep 1989 WO
9012551 Nov 1990 WO
9206639 Apr 1992 WO
9220349 Nov 1992 WO
9311805 Jun 1993 WO
9318174 Sep 1993 WO
9417747 Aug 1994 WO
9507666 Mar 1995 WO
9518638 Jul 1995 WO
9532687 Dec 1995 WO
9603091 Feb 1996 WO
9608277 Mar 1996 WO
9609795 Apr 1996 WO
9614805 May 1996 WO
9641588 Dec 1996 WO
9735533 Oct 1997 WO
9835632 Aug 1998 WO
9849967 Nov 1998 WO
9905990 Feb 1999 WO
9906079 Feb 1999 WO
9906080 Feb 1999 WO
9951163 Oct 1999 WO
0016821 Mar 2000 WO
0067663 Nov 2000 WO
0115625 Mar 2001 WO
0180773 Nov 2001 WO
0207648 Jan 2002 WO
02078568 Oct 2002 WO
03002168 Jan 2003 WO
2004004600 Jan 2004 WO
2004071349 Aug 2004 WO
2004078120 Sep 2004 WO
2004103212 Dec 2004 WO
2005011280 Feb 2005 WO
2005013863 Feb 2005 WO
2005018698 Mar 2005 WO
2005105172 Nov 2005 WO
2006018552 Feb 2006 WO
2006023444 Mar 2006 WO
2007048099 Apr 2007 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (32)
Entry
CN Office Action issued Sep. 21, 2015 in corresponding CN Patent Application No. CN201280043025.9.
Ellouali, M. et al., “Antitumor Activity of Low Molecular Weight Fucans Extracted from Brown Seaweed Ascophyllu nodosum,” Anticancer Res., Nov.-Dec. 1993, pp. 2011-2020, 12 (6A).
Malette, W. G. et al., “Chitosan, A New Hemostatic,” Ann Th. Surg., Jul. 1983, pp. 55-58, 36.
Langenbech, M. R. et al., “Comparison of biomaterials in the early postoperative period,” Surg Endosc., May 2003, pp. 1105-1109, 17 (7).
Bracco, P. et al., “Comparison of polypropylene and polyethylene terephthalate (Dacron) meshes for abdominal wall hemia repair: A chemical and morphological study,” Hernia, 2005, pp. 51-55, 9 (1), published online Sep. 2004.
Klinge, U. et al., “Foreign Body Reaction to Meshes Used for the Repair of Abdominal Wall Hernias,” Eur J. Surg, Sep. 1999, pp. 665-673, 165.
Logeart, D. et al., “Fucans, sulfated polysaccharides extracted from brown seaweeds, inhibit vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation. II. Degradation and molecular weight effect,” Eur. J. Cell. Biol., Dec. 1997, pp. 385-390, 74(4).
Haneji, K. et al., “Fucoidan extracted from Cladosiphon Okamuranus Tokida Induces Apoptosis of Human T-cell Leukemia Virus Type 1-Infected T-Cell Lines and Primary Adult T-Cell Leukemia Cells,” Nutrition and Cancer, 2005, pp. 189-201, 52(2), published online Nov. 2009.
Junge, K. et al., “Functional and Morphologic Properties of a Modified Mesh for Inguinal Hernia Repair,” World J. Surg., Sep. 2002, pp. 1472-1480, 26.
Klinge, U. et al., “Functional and Morphological Evaluation of a Low-Weight, Monofilament Polypropylene Mesh for Hernia Repair,” J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Jan. 2002, pp. 129-136, 63.
Welty, G. et al., “Functional impairment and complaints following incisional hernia repair with different polypropylene meshes,” Hernia, Aug. 2001; pp. 142-147, 5.
Varum, K. et al., “In vitro degradation rates of partially N-acetylated chitosans in human serum,” Carbohydrate Research, Mar. 1997, pp. 99-101, 299.
Haroun-Bouhedja, F. et al., “In Vitro Effects of Fucans on MDA-MB231 Tumor Cell Adhesion and Invasion,” Anticancer Res., Jul.-Aug. 2002, pp. 2285-2292, 22(4).
Scheidbach, H. et al., “In vivo studies comparing the biocompatibility of various polypropylene meshes and their handling properties during endoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) patchplasty: An experimental study in pigs,” Surg. Endosc., Feb. 2004, pp. 211-220,18(2).
Blondin, C. et al., “Inhibition of Complement Activation by Natural Sulfated Polysaccharides (Fucans) from Brown Seaweed,” Molecular Immuol., Mar. 1994, pp. 247-253, 31(4).
Zvyagintseva, T. et al., “Inhibition of complement activation by water-soluble polysaccharides of some far-eastern brown seaweeds,” Comparative Biochem and Physiol, Jul. 2000, pp. 209-215,126(3).
Rosen, M. et al., “Laparoscopic component separation in the single-stage treatment of infected abdominal wall prosthetic removal,” Hernia, 2007, pp. 435-440, 11, published online Jul. 2007.
Amid, P., “Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty: Its inception, evolution, and principles,” Hernia, 2004; pp. 1-7, 8, published online Sep. 2003.
Boisson-Vidal, C. et al., “Neoangiogenesis Induced by Progenitor Endothelial Cells: Effect of Fucoidan From Marine Algae,” Cardiovascular & Hematological Agents in Medicinal Chem., Jan. 2007, pp. 67-77, 5(1).
O'Dwyer, P. et al., “Randomized clinical trial assessing impact of a lightweight or heavyweight mesh on chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair,” Br. J. Surg., Feb. 2005, pp. 166-170, 92(2).
Muzzarelli, R. et al., “Reconstruction of parodontal tissue with chitosan,” Biomaterials, Nov. 1989, pp. 598-604, 10.
Haroun-Bouhedja, F. et al., “Relationship between sulfate groups and biological activities of fucans,” Thrombosis Res., Dec. 2000, pp. 453-459, 100(5).
Blondin, C. et al., “Relationships between chemical characteristics and anticomplementary activity of fucans,” Biomaterials, Mar. 1996, pp. 597-603, 17(6).
Strand, S. et al., “Screening of Chitosans and Conditions for Bacterial Flocculation,” Biomacromolecules, Mar. 2001, 126-133, 2.
Kanabar, V. et al., “Some structural determinants of the antiproliferative effect of heparin-like molecules on human airway smooth muscle,” Br. J. Pharmacol., Oct. 2005, pp. 370-777, 146(3).
Hirano, S. et al., “The blood biocompatibility of chitosan and N-acylchitosans,” J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Apr. 1985, 113-417, 19.
Rao, B. et al., “Use of chitosan as a biomaterial: Studies on its safety and hemostatic potential,” J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Jan. 1997, pp. 21-28, 34.
Prokop, A. et al., “Water Soluble Polymers for Immunoisolation I: Complex Coacevation and Cytotoxicity,” Advances in Polymer Science, Jul. 1998, pp. 1-51, 136.
Collins, R. et al., “Use of collagen film as a dural substitute: Preliminary animal studies,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Feb. 1991, pp. 267-276, vol. 25.
Preliminary Search Report from French Patent Office dated Dec. 20, 2006, 3 pages.
International Search Report for PCT/IB12/002579 date of completion is Apr. 22, 2013 (2 pages).
CN Office Action issued Feb. 15, 2016 in corresponding CN Patent Application No. 201280043025.9, together with English-language abstract, 8 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140236199 A1 Aug 2014 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61541610 Sep 2011 US