The present invention is generally related to encoding digital video data.
The continuing spread of digital media has led to a proliferation of video encoding standards, such as MPEG-4, H.263, H.264, DIVX, and XVID. These video standards attempt to balance compression of raw data and quality of video playback. Most video compression techniques use temporal and spatial prediction to compress raw video streams. However, each of the standards calls for different specific operations.
In addition to the proliferation of competing video standards, more devices are being marketed which include video encoding or decoding functionality. The manufacturers of these devices must decide which video standards to support, which requires balancing the costs associated with supporting a given video standard against the value added by supporting that standard.
Typically, support for a video standard can be implemented one of two ways. Either support is provided via software, or via a specialized hardware. Software implementations require that the processor in the device perform all of the encoding or decoding operations, which can be a computationally expensive task, and often cannot be performed in real-time by a general-purpose processor. Hardware implementations typically require a completely separate encoder for each video standard supported, with the associated expenses of developing, manufacturing, and powering the related hardware.
Described herein are a number of approaches for implementing a video encoder with hardware-enabled rewind functionality. In several embodiments, rewind functionality can be implemented in hardware, in a manner which allows the transform engine of the encoder to reprocess video data, without requesting data from other stages in the encoder. Such rewind functionality is useful in implementing some video standards in a pipeline architecture, such as the H.264 standard. In one embodiment, a method of encoding video data is described, which involves obtaining a first portion of video data from a first location in a buffer, and performing an encoding operation on it. The second portion of video data is obtained from a second location in the buffer, and encoding operations begin on the second portion. The first portion of video data can be retrieved from the first location, in order to reprocess the first portion if necessary.
Another embodiment describes a system for encoding video data, which includes a transform buffer for storing processed macroblocks, a transform engine for transforming the processed macroblocks into quantized macroblocks, and a rewind control module for causing the transform engine to reprocess one of the processed macroblocks.
A further embodiment describes a handheld computer system device, which includes a system memory, a central processing unit (CPU), and a graphics processing unit (GPU). The GPU includes an encoder for encoding video data, which is configured to obtain a first portion of video data from a first location in a buffer, and perform an encoding operation on it the encoder is further configured to obtain a second portion of video data from a second location in the buffer, and begin performing encoding operations on it. The encoder is also configured to retrieve the first portion of video data from the first location in the buffer, in order to reprocess the first portion of video data, as needed.
The present invention is illustrated by way of example, and not by way of limitation, in the Figures of the accompanying drawings and in which like reference numerals refer to similar elements.
Reference will now be made in detail to several embodiments of the invention. While the invention will be described in conjunction with the alternative embodiment(s), it will be understood that they are not intended to limit the invention to these embodiments. On the contrary, the invention is intended to cover alternative, modifications, and equivalents, which may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
Furthermore, in the following detailed description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the claimed subject matter. However, it will be recognized by one skilled in the art that embodiments may be practiced without these specific details or with equivalents thereof. In other instances, well-known methods, procedures, components, and circuits have not been described in detail as not to unnecessarily obscure aspects and features of the subject matter.
Portions of the detailed description that follows are presented and discussed in terms of a method. Although steps and sequencing thereof are disclosed in figures herein (e.g.,
Some portions of the detailed description are presented in terms of procedures, steps, logic blocks, processing, and other symbolic representations of operations on data bits that can be performed on computer memory. These descriptions and representations are the means used by those skilled in the data processing arts to most effectively convey the substance of their work to others skilled in the art. A procedure, computer-executed step, logic block, process, etc., is here, and generally, conceived to be a self-consistent sequence of steps or instructions leading to a desired result. The steps are those requiring physical manipulations of physical quantities. Usually, though not necessarily, these quantities take the form of electrical or magnetic signals capable of being stored, transferred, combined, compared, and otherwise manipulated in a computer system. It has proven convenient at times, principally for reasons of common usage, to refer to these signals as bits, values, elements, symbols, characters, terms, numbers, or the like.
It should be borne in mind, however, that all of these and similar terms are to be associated with the appropriate physical quantities and are merely convenient labels applied to these quantities. Unless specifically stated otherwise as apparent from the following discussions, it is appreciated that throughout, discussions utilizing terms such as “accessing,” “writing,” “including,” “storing,” “transmitting,” “traversing,” “associating,” “identifying” or the like, refer to the action and processes of a computer system, or similar electronic computing device, that manipulates and transforms data represented as physical (electronic) quantities within the computer system's registers and memories into other data similarly represented as physical quantities within the computer system memories or registers or other such information storage, transmission or display devices.
Computing devices typically include at least some form of computer readable media. Computer readable media can be any available media that can be accessed by a computing device. By way of example, and not limitation, computer readable medium may comprise computer storage media and communication media. Computer storage media includes volatile and nonvolatile, removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information such as computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules, or other data. Computer storage media includes, but is not limited to, RAM, ROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile discs (DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store the desired information and which can be accessed by a computing device. Communication media typically embodies computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules, or other data in a modulated data signals such as a carrier wave or other transport mechanism and includes any information delivery media. The term “modulated data signal” means a signal that has one or more of its characteristics set or changed in such a manner as to encode information in the signal. By way of example, and not limitation, communication media includes wired media such as a wired network or direct-wired connection, and wireless media such as acoustic, RF, infrared, and other wireless media. Combinations of any of the above should also be included within the scope of computer readable media.
Some embodiments may be described in the general context of computer-executable instructions, such as program modules, executed by one or more computers or other devices. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, etc. that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. Typically the functionality of the program modules may be combined or distributed as desired in various embodiments.
Although embodiments described herein may make reference to a CPU and a GPU as discrete components of a computer system, those skilled in the art will recognize that a CPU and a GPU can be integrated into a single device, and a CPU and GPU may share various resources such as instruction logic, buffers, functional units and so on; or separate resources may be provided for graphics and general-purpose operations. Accordingly, any or all of the circuits and/or functionality described herein as being associated with GPU could also be implemented in and performed by a suitably configured CPU.
Further, while embodiments described herein may make reference to a GPU, it is to be understood that the circuits and/or functionality described herein could also be implemented in other types of processors, such as general-purpose or other special-purpose coprocessors, or within a CPU.
Basic Computing System
Referring now to
Computer system 112 comprises an address/data bus 100 for communicating information, a central processor 101 coupled with bus 100 for processing information and instructions; a volatile memory unit 102 (e.g., random access memory [RAM], static RAM, dynamic RAM, etc.) coupled with bus 100 for storing information and instructions for central processor 101; and a non-volatile memory unit 103 (e.g., read only memory [ROM], programmable ROM, flash memory, etc.) coupled with bus 100 for storing static information and instructions for processor 101. Moreover, computer system 112 also comprises a data storage device 104 (e.g., hard disk drive) for storing information and instructions.
Computer system 112 also comprises an optional graphics subsystem 105, an optional alphanumeric input device 106, an optional cursor control or directing device 107, and signal communication interface (input/output device) 108. Optional alphanumeric input device 106 can communicate information and command selections to central processor 101. Optional cursor control or directing device 107 is coupled to bus 100 for communicating user input information and command selections to central processor 101. Signal communication interface (input/output device) 108, which is also coupled to bus 100, can be a serial port. Communication interface 108 may also include wireless communication mechanisms. Using communication interface 108, computer system 112 can be communicatively coupled to other computer systems over a communication network such as the Internet or an intranet (e.g., a local area network), or can receive data (e.g., a digital television signal). Computer system 112 may also comprise graphics subsystem 105 for presenting information to the computer user, e.g., by displaying information on an attached display device 110, connected by a video cable 111. In some embodiments, graphics subsystem 105 is incorporated into central processor 101. In other embodiments, graphics subsystem 105 is a separate, discrete component. In other embodiments, graphics subsystem 105 is incorporated into another component. In other embodiments, graphics subsystem 105 is included in system 112 in other ways.
Multistandard Video Encoder
The embodiments detailed herein describe a multistandard encoder, where expensive redundant elements can be shared across different video standards. In some embodiments, for example, buffers between stages in the encoding pipeline can be used regardless of the video standard being used, while standard-specific hardware data paths are used to perform the necessary manipulation of the data stored in these buffers. In this way, these embodiments eliminate the need to duplicate the expensive buffers across separate hardware encoders for each supported video standard. Embodiments utilizing this approach require fewer hardware elements to implement, are more modular in design such that support for a given standard is easier to add or remove, and require less power than the traditional approach of completely separate hardware encoders for every video standard.
Moreover, some of the embodiments described herein describe a rewind-enabled hardware encoder. Several modern video standards, such as H.264, describe a “rewind” functionality, where data can be reprocessed under a number of different circumstances. In these embodiments, multiple buffers are used to store data after it has been processed by the transform engine in an encoder, in order to allow the data to be easily reprocessed.
One embodiment described herein combines the functionality detailed above, to create a multistandard encoder which supports hardware rewind. This embodiment offers the advantages of multistandard hardware video encoding, in combination with the processing time advantage of hardware-enabled rewind, to support the goal of real-time encoding.
Encoder Architecture
With reference now to
Encoder 200, in the depicted embodiment, is representative of a typical hardware encoder for a video standard using temporal and spatial prediction to compress raw video streams. Raw video data is placed in memory 210. Motion search module 220 retrieves the raw video data and processes it, often in macroblocks of 16×16 pixels. Each processed macroblock is loaded into transform buffer 225. Transform engine 230 retrieves the processed macroblock from transform buffer 225, performs additional operations, and outputs data to quantization buffer 235. Entropy encoder 240 takes the data from quantization buffer 235, and outputs an encoded bitstream.
Buffers, such as transform buffer 225 and quantization buffer 235, are used in encoding to increase hardware efficiency. Buffers allow the various encoding stages to work simultaneously and relatively independent of the other stages. For example, rather than requiring motion search module 220 to wait for transform engine 230 to complete operations, motion search module 220 loads a completed macroblock into transform buffer 225, and begins processing the next macroblock.
Multistandard Encoder with Shared Buffers
With reference now to
The depicted embodiment shows a portion of a multistandard encoder, to illustrate the approach used therein. As with encoder 200, motion search module 320 processes macroblocks, and outputs them to transform buffers 325. Transform engine 330 retrieves the macro blocks from transform buffers 325, processes them, and outputs quantized macroblock data to quantization buffers 335. Entropy encoder 340 retrieves the quantized macroblock data, and uses it to produce an encoded bitstream.
In this embodiment, transform buffers 325 include source data buffer 326, prediction data buffer 327, and input parameter buffer 320. Motion search module 320, in this embodiment, populates these buffers. Source data buffer 326 stores raw video pixels of the current macroblock. Prediction data buffer 327 stores predicted video pixels for the current macroblock by motion search module, which transform engine 330 will use when processing macroblock information from source data buffer 326. Input parameter buffer 328 stores parameters of the current macroblock such as motion vectors, quantization parameters, etc., which are used by transform engine 330 in determining how to process macroblock information, e.g., what bit rate the video should be encoded at.
In this embodiment, quantization buffers 335 include quantization data buffer 336, and output parameter buffer 337. Quantization data buffer 336 is used to store quantized macroblock pixels or coefficients produced by transform engine 330, and used by entropy encoder 340. Output parameter buffer 337 is used to pass encoding parameters to entropy encoder 340, for use in processing the quantized macroblock information.
In the depicted embodiment, transform engine 330 includes a number of standard-specific datapaths, e.g., MPEG-4 transform datapaths 331, H.263 transform datapath 332, and H.264 transform datapath 333. In different embodiments, different, fewer, or additional video standards may be supported by inclusion of different, fewer, or additional hardware datapaths.
Under this approach, buffers can be shared between different hardware datapaths, e.g., both the MPEG-4 and H.264 transform datapaths can read from the same set of transform buffers 325, and write to the same set of quantization buffers 335. In some embodiments, the encoder can be instructed, e.g., by driver software executing on a processor, as to which video standard to use when encoding the raw video data. This instruction, in turn, will determine which transform datapath is used by transform engine 330 when encoding data. Similarly, motion search module 320 and/or entropy encoder 340 may include several hardware datapaths, in order to support and select between multiple video standards.
Method of Video Encoding
With reference now to
With reference to step 410, a driver instructs a processor to encode video data. In some embodiments, a graphics processor or GPU is utilized, incorporating an encoder such as that described in
With reference now to step 415, the driver provides a context for encoding video frame data. In some embodiments, as previously discussed, the encoder may be capable of encoding video data in accordance with a number of different video encoding standards. In one such embodiment, the driver software instructs the encoder as to which video standard to use in encoding the video data. In one such embodiment, the encoder supports changing the encoding standard on a frame-by-frame basis.
With reference now to step 420, a motion search module obtains and processes raw video data. In some embodiments, a motion search module performs some encoding tasks. In several such embodiments, the motion search module may be configured to perform a different tasks, depending upon the video standard specified in step 415.
With reference now to step 425, a motion search module loads processed video data into shared transform buffers. In these embodiments, a single set of transform buffers are shared by a number of different encoding data paths. Regardless of which video standard is specified, the motion search module outputs processed video data to the same shared transform buffers.
For example, with reference to
With reference now to step 430, a transform engine selects an appropriate transform datapath. As discussed previously, several embodiments incorporate hardware support for multiple video encoding standards, and include multiple hardware datapaths in the encoder. Depending upon the video standard specified in step 415, an appropriate hardware transform datapath may be selected. Moreover, in some embodiments, software encoding may be supported for several video standards; in such an embodiment, software instructions executing on a processor may be utilized during the encoding process. These embodiments allow for expandability in supported video encoding standards, particularly for standards which are computationally less demanding.
With reference now to step 435, the transfer engine passes data from the shared transform buffers through the selected datapath. In different embodiments, and depending upon the selected video standard, different operations may be performed by the selected transform datapath.
With reference now to step 440, the transform engine loads the output from the transform datapath into shared quantization buffers. In some embodiments, the output from a the transform datapath consists of quantized macroblock information, e.g., quantized coefficients. This quantized macroblock information can be loaded into shared quantization buffers.
Continuing the preceding example, transform engine 330 selects the appropriate transform datapath for the desired video standard, e.g., MPEG4 transform datapath 331 is used if the video is to be encoded using the MPEG-4 standard, or H.264 transform datapath 333 may be selected for H.264 video encoding. The selected transform datapath is connected to source data buffer 326, prediction data buffer 327, and input parameter buffer 328. The data is processed in accordance with the selected video standard, and output to quantization data buffer 336 and output parameter buffer 337.
With reference now to step 445, an entropy encoder processes data from the shared quantization buffers. In some embodiments, an entropy encoder is used to further process video data during the encoding process. The operations performed by the entropy encoder may vary, depending upon the embodiment and the selected video standard. As with the motion search module in the transform engine, the entropy encoder may include multiple hardware datapaths, to support multiple video standards. Also as with the motion search module and the transform engine, the entropy encoder may use software instructions executing a processor to support a video encoding standard. The shared quantization buffers are accessible to the various datapaths included in the entropy encoder.
With reference now to step 450, the entropy encoder outputs an encoded bit stream. In some embodiments, the entropy encoder outputs a packetized bit stream, which may be written to memory, to a buffer, and/or output to a display.
Hardware-Enabled Rewind Functionality
With reference now
As with
Transform engine 530 is shown as incorporating forward transform module 531, inverse transform module 533, and reconstructed frame buffer 534. For the H.264 standard, as with a number of other video standards, the operations performed by this collection of modules are standardized, though the organization and naming of modules may vary across different embodiments. Forward transform module 531 loads data into quantization buffers 535, where entropy encoder 540 can retrieve it.
In order to implement some video standards, such as H.264, in a macroblock pipeline architecture, rewind functionality is utilized, such that the entropy encoder can reject a processed macroblock. Such rejection typically occurs for one of two reasons. If the processed macroblock data, as produced by the transform data path, is larger than the unprocessed macroblock data, the entropy encoder will report an IPCM error. If the processed macroblock data does not fit in the current video data packet, the entropy encoder will return a bit-based error. If both of these conditions occur, the entropy encoder will report both errors.
Depending upon the configuration of the encoder, as well as the video standard being utilized, the transform engine may react in a number of different ways to these errors. In one embodiment, the transform engine will respond to an IPCM error by sending the unprocessed video data instead, rather than passing the data through the forward transform module. In another embodiment, the transform engine may reprocess the data, using a different set of parameters, to attempt to produce acceptable processed macroblock data. In some embodiments, the transform engine responds to a bit-based error by reprocessing the data for the rejected macroblock. In one embodiment, the transform engine responds to the combination of an IPCM error and a bit-based error by responding as per an IPCM error.
Encoder 500, in the depicted embodiment, includes rewind control module 590. Rewind control module 590 receives the rewind signal from entropy encoder 540. In some embodiments, entropy encoder 540 outputs a rewind signal for every macroblock processed; in other embodiments, entropy encoder 540 might only output a rewind signal when a macroblock is rejected. In the case of a rewind condition occurring, rewind control module 590 utilizes the control functionality present in each of the transform buffers 525, to alter which buffers transform engine 530 is accessing, e.g., by selecting the buffers corresponding to the rejected macroblock.
In some embodiments, the rewind signal is also passed to driver software (not pictured) which controls encoder 500. In one such embodiment, the driver software instructs the transform engine to stop processing its current macroblock, and to process the macroblock in the currently-designated buffers, e.g., the buffers associated with the rejected macroblock. For example, if macroblock n−1 was rejected by entropy encoder 540, the driver would instruct the transform engine to stop processing macroblock n. Rewind control 590 would alter the pointers for transform buffers 525 to point to the buffers containing data for macroblock n−1, and the driver software would instruct H.264 transform engine 530 to reprocess the data. If only a bit-based error was reported by entropy encoder 540, the macroblock would be reprocessed with the original parameters. If an IPCM error was reported, the unprocessed macroblock data would be written to quantization buffers 535.
Method of Rewind-Enabled Encoding
With reference now to
With reference to step 610, a transform engine processes a first macroblock. As previously discussed, the steps performed in conjunction with processing macroblock data may vary, across different video encoding standards and different embodiments.
With reference now to step 615, the transform engine writes the processed first macroblock to the quantization buffers and the reconstructed frame buffer. As with step 610, the specific buffers involved, as well as the format and type of data involved, may vary across different video encoding standards and different embodiments.
With reference now to step 620, the transform engine begins processing a second macroblock. As noted earlier, one advantage of including buffers between modules is to enable them to operate independently, and hence more efficiently. The transform engine is not forced to wait for the entropy encoder to accept the first macroblock, before beginning work on the second.
With reference now to step 622, if the entropy encoder detects an error, it sends a rewind signal indicating the nature of the error. The entropy encoder may routinely send a signal, providing status information regarding the processing of macroblock data, and including a status flag to indicate any errors; alternatively, the entropy encoder may only send a signal when an error occurs.
With reference now to step 624, the transform engine stops processing the second macroblock. In many video standards, the processing of a macroblock depends upon how the preceding macroblocks were processed, such that it may not be possible to complete the processing of the second macroblock, if the first was rejected and may change during reprocessing. In different embodiments, different actions may be involved in this step. For example, the software driver controlling the encoder may instruct the transform engine to cease processing; alternatively, a hardware rewind control module may be able to stop the transform engine, in response to a rewind signal from the entropy encoder.
With reference now to step 626, the transform engine reads from the buffers associated with the first macroblock. In different embodiments, this step may be accomplished in different ways. In one embodiment, for example, the software driver may force a reload of the necessary data into the transform buffers. In another embodiment, such as that of
With reference now to step 630, the transform engine reprocesses the first macroblock. In different embodiments, different error types may result in different actions.
With reference to step 632, if the rewind signal was the result of an IPCM error (or both an IPCM error and a bit-based error), the processed data produced by the transform engine was unacceptable large, e.g., larger than the unprocessed data was. In one embodiment, the transform engine provides the unprocessed data instead. In another embodiment, the transform engine may reprocess the first macroblock, using different input parameters to attempt to produce an acceptable output.
With reference to step 634, if the rewind signal was the result of a bit-based error, the current video data packet being prepared by the entropy encoder cannot include the processed first macroblock data. The first macroblock should be reprocessed, such that it can be included in the next video data packet.
With reference now to step 635, the reprocessed first macroblock is written to the quantization buffers.
With reference now to step 640, the transform engine begins processing the second macroblock. In some embodiments, the transform engine may be able to resume processing from a partially-processed state. In most embodiments, however, the processing of the second macroblock depends upon the first one, such that changes in how the first macroblock was processed will result in changes to how the second macroblock is processed.
Multistandard Rewind-Enabled Architecture
In some embodiments, multistandard video encoding support, such as previously described, can be combined with the hardware-enabled rewind functionality just described. In one such embodiment, the shared buffers include the multiple entries and control functionality necessary to enable the rewind function, as well as including the rewind signaling in the entropy encoder and the rewind control module.
Embodiments such as these provide the advantages of multistandard video encoding support, where redundant hardware can be limited and support for individual encoding standards can be more readily added or removed. These embodiments also provide hardware support for the rewind functionality described in several video encoding standards, which is helpful in attempting to provide real-time encoding for standards such as H.264. Those video standards which do not require a hardware rewind are not affected by including support for those standards which do.
Embodiments of the present invention are thus described. While the present invention has been described in particular embodiments, it should be appreciated that the present invention should not be construed as limited by such embodiments, but rather construed according to the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3091657 | Stuessel | May 1963 | A |
3614740 | Delagi et al. | Oct 1971 | A |
3987291 | Gooding et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
4101960 | Stokes et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4208810 | Rohner et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4541046 | Nagashima et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4566005 | Apperley et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4748585 | Chiarulli et al. | May 1988 | A |
4897717 | Hamilton et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4918626 | Watkins et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4958303 | Assarpour et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4965716 | Sweeney | Oct 1990 | A |
4965751 | Thayer et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4985848 | Pfeiffer et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5040109 | Bowhill et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5047975 | Patti et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5081594 | Horsley | Jan 1992 | A |
5175828 | Hall et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5179530 | Genusov et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5197130 | Chen et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5210834 | Zurawski et al. | May 1993 | A |
5263136 | DeAguiar et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5287438 | Kelleher | Feb 1994 | A |
5313287 | Barton | May 1994 | A |
5327369 | Ashkenazi | Jul 1994 | A |
5357623 | Megory-Cohen | Oct 1994 | A |
5375223 | Meyers et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5388206 | Poulton et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5388245 | Wong | Feb 1995 | A |
5418973 | Ellis et al. | May 1995 | A |
5421029 | Yoshida | May 1995 | A |
5430841 | Tannenbaum et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5430884 | Beard et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5432898 | Curb et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5432905 | Hsieh et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5446836 | Lentz et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5452104 | Lee | Sep 1995 | A |
5452412 | Johnson, Jr. et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5483258 | Cornett et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5517666 | Ohtani et al. | May 1996 | A |
5522080 | Harney | May 1996 | A |
5543935 | Harrington | Aug 1996 | A |
5560030 | Guttag et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5561808 | Kuma et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5570463 | Dao | Oct 1996 | A |
5574944 | Stager | Nov 1996 | A |
5594854 | Baldwin et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5610657 | Zhang | Mar 1997 | A |
5623692 | Priem et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5627988 | Oldfield | May 1997 | A |
5633297 | Valko et al. | May 1997 | A |
5644753 | Ebrahim et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5649173 | Lentz | Jul 1997 | A |
5664162 | Dye | Sep 1997 | A |
5666169 | Ohki et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5682552 | Kuboki et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5682554 | Harrell | Oct 1997 | A |
5706478 | Dye | Jan 1998 | A |
5708511 | Gandhi et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5754191 | Mills et al. | May 1998 | A |
5761476 | Martell | Jun 1998 | A |
5764243 | Baldwin | Jun 1998 | A |
5784590 | Cohen et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5784640 | Asghar et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5796974 | Goddard et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5802574 | Atallah et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809524 | Singh et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812147 | Van Hook et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5815162 | Levine | Sep 1998 | A |
5835740 | Wise et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5835788 | Blumer et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5848192 | Smith et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5848254 | Hagersten | Dec 1998 | A |
5854631 | Akeley et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5854637 | Sturges | Dec 1998 | A |
5872902 | Kuchkuda et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5920352 | Inoue | Jul 1999 | A |
5925124 | Hilgendorf et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5940090 | Wilde | Aug 1999 | A |
5940858 | Green | Aug 1999 | A |
5949410 | Fung | Sep 1999 | A |
5950012 | Shiell et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5977987 | Duluk, Jr. | Nov 1999 | A |
5978838 | Mohamed et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999199 | Larson | Dec 1999 | A |
6009454 | Dummermuth | Dec 1999 | A |
6016474 | Kim et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6028608 | Jenkins | Feb 2000 | A |
6034699 | Wong et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6041399 | Terada et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6049672 | Shiell et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6072500 | Foran et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6073158 | Nally et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6092094 | Ireton | Jul 2000 | A |
6104407 | Aleksic et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6104417 | Nielsen et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108766 | Hahn et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6112019 | Chamdani et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6115049 | Winner et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6118394 | Onaya | Sep 2000 | A |
6128000 | Jouppi et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6131152 | Ang et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6137918 | Harrington et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141740 | Mahalingaiah et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144392 | Rogers | Nov 2000 | A |
6150610 | Sutton | Nov 2000 | A |
6160557 | Narayanaswami | Dec 2000 | A |
6188394 | Morein et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6189068 | Witt et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192073 | Reader et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192458 | Arimilli et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6201545 | Wong et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6204859 | Jouppi et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208361 | Gossett | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6209078 | Chiang et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6219070 | Baker et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6222552 | Haas et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6230254 | Senter et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6239810 | Van Hook et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6247094 | Kumar et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249853 | Porterfield | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6252610 | Hussain | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6259460 | Gossett et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6292886 | Makineni et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6301299 | Sita et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6301600 | Petro et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6314493 | Luick | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6317819 | Morton | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6323874 | Gossett | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6351808 | Joy et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6359623 | Larson | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6362819 | Dalal et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366289 | Johns | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6370617 | Lu et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6429877 | Stroyan | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6437780 | Baltaretu et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6437789 | Tidwell et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438664 | McGrath et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6452595 | Montrym et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6469707 | Voorhies | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6480205 | Greene et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6480927 | Bauman | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6490654 | Wickeraad et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6496902 | Faanes et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6499090 | Hill et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6501564 | Schramm et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6504542 | Voorhies et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6522329 | Ihara et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6525737 | Duluk, Jr. et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6529201 | Ault et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6529207 | Landau et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6587506 | Noridomi et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6597357 | Thomas | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6603481 | Kawai et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6606093 | Gossett et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6611272 | Hussain et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6614444 | Duluk, Jr. et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6614448 | Garlick et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6624818 | Mantor et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6624823 | Deering | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6629188 | Minkin et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6631423 | Brown et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6631463 | Floyd et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6633197 | Sutardja | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6633297 | McCormack et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6646639 | Greene et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6657635 | Hutchins et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6658447 | Cota-Robles | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6671000 | Cloutier | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6674841 | Johns et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6693637 | Koneru et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6693639 | Duluk, Jr. et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6697063 | Zhu | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6700588 | MacInnis et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6715035 | Colglazier et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6717576 | Duluk, Jr. et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6717578 | Deering | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6732242 | Hill et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6734861 | Van Dyke et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6741247 | Fenney | May 2004 | B1 |
6747057 | Ruzafa et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6765575 | Voorhies et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6778177 | Furtner | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6788301 | Thrasher | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6798410 | Redshaw et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6803916 | Ramani et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6809732 | Zatz et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6812929 | Lavelle et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6819332 | Baldwin | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6825843 | Allen et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6825848 | Fu et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6833835 | van Vugt | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6839062 | Aronson et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6862027 | Andrews et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6891543 | Wyatt | May 2005 | B2 |
6906716 | Moreton et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6915385 | Leasure et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6938176 | Alben et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6940514 | Wasserman et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6944744 | Ahmed et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6947057 | Nelson et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6952214 | Naegle et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6956579 | Diard et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6961057 | Van Dyke et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6965982 | Nemawarkar | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6975324 | Valmiki et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6976126 | Clegg et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6978149 | Morelli et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6978317 | Anantha et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6978457 | Johl et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6981106 | Bauman et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6985151 | Bastos et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7002591 | Leather et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7009607 | Lindholm et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7009615 | Kilgard et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7015909 | Morgan, III et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7031330 | Bianchini, Jr. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7032097 | Alexander et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7035979 | Azevedo et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7061495 | Leather | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7064771 | Jouppi et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7075542 | Leather | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7081902 | Crow et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7119809 | McCabe | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7126600 | Fowler et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7148888 | Huang | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7151544 | Emberling | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7154066 | Talwar et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7154500 | Heng et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7158148 | Toji et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7159212 | Schenk et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7170515 | Zhu | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7184040 | Tzvetkov | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7185178 | Barreh et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7202872 | Paltashev et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7224364 | Yue et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7260677 | Vartti et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7305540 | Trivedi et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7307628 | Goodman et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7307638 | Leather et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7321787 | Kim | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7334110 | Faanes et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7369815 | Kang et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7373478 | Yamazaki | May 2008 | B2 |
7382368 | Molnar et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7406698 | Richardson | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7412570 | Moll et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7453466 | Hux et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7483029 | Crow et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7486290 | Kilgariff et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7487305 | Hill et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7493452 | Eichenberger et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7545381 | Huang et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7548996 | Baker et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7551174 | Iourcha et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7564460 | Boland et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7633506 | Leather et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7634637 | Lindholm et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7714747 | Fallon | May 2010 | B2 |
7750913 | Parenteau et al. | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7777748 | Bakalash et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7791617 | Crow et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7852341 | Rouet et al. | Dec 2010 | B1 |
7869835 | Zu | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7957465 | Dei et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7965902 | Zelinka et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
8020169 | Yamasaki | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8063903 | Vignon et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
20010005209 | Lindholm et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010026647 | Morita | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010028747 | Sato et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010031092 | Zeck et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010055336 | Krause et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020050979 | Oberoi et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020061184 | Miyamoto | May 2002 | A1 |
20020097241 | McCormack et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020114402 | Doetsch et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116595 | Morton | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020130863 | Baldwin | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020130874 | Baldwin | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020140655 | Liang et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020144061 | Faanes et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020158885 | Brokenshire et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020194430 | Cho | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020196251 | Duluk, Jr. et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030001847 | Doyle et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030003943 | Bajikar | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014457 | Desai et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030016217 | Vlachos et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030016844 | Numaoka | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030031258 | Wang et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030067468 | Duluk, Jr. et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030067473 | Taylor et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030076325 | Thrasher | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030122815 | Deering | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030163589 | Bunce et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030172326 | Coffin, III et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030188118 | Jackson | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030194116 | Wong et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030201994 | Taylor et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204673 | Venkumahanti et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204680 | Hardage, Jr. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030227461 | Hux et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030228063 | Nakayama et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040012597 | Zatz et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040049379 | Thumpudi et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040073771 | Chen et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073773 | Demjanenko | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040085313 | Moreton et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040103253 | Kamei et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040130552 | Duluk, Jr. et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040183801 | Deering | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193837 | Devaney et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040196285 | Rice et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040205326 | Sindagi et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040207642 | Crisu et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040212730 | MacInnis et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215887 | Starke | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040221117 | Shelor | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040246251 | Fenney et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040263519 | Andrews et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050002454 | Ueno et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050012759 | Valmiki et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050024369 | Xie | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050030314 | Dawson | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050041037 | Dawson | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050066148 | Luick | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050071722 | Biles | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050088448 | Hussain et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050094729 | Yuan et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050122338 | Hong et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050123057 | MacInnis et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050134588 | Aila et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050134603 | Iourcha et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050147166 | Shibata et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050147308 | Kitamura | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050179698 | Vijayakumar et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050239518 | D'Agostino et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050259100 | Teruyama | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050262332 | Rappoport et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050280652 | Hutchins et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060020843 | Frodsham et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060034369 | Mohsenian | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060044317 | Bourd et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060045359 | Chen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064517 | Oliver | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064547 | Kottapalli et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060103659 | Karandikar et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060152519 | Hutchins et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060152520 | Gadre et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060170690 | Leather | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060176308 | Karandikar et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060176309 | Gadre et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060203005 | Hunter | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060245001 | Lee et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060267981 | Naoi | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070002946 | Bouton et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070025441 | Ugur et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070076010 | Swamy et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070130444 | Mitu et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070139440 | Crow et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070153907 | Mehta et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070253491 | Ito et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070268298 | Alben et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070273689 | Tsao | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070285427 | Morein et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070286280 | Saigo et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070286289 | Arai et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070296725 | Steiner et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080016327 | Menon et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080024497 | Crow et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080024522 | Crow et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080100618 | Woo et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080181522 | Hosaka et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080226187 | Sato | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080273218 | Kitora et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080278509 | Washizu et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090102686 | Fukuhara et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090154557 | Zhao et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090168899 | Schlanger et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090235051 | Codrescu et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20120023149 | Kinsman et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101093578 | Dec 2007 | CN |
29606102 | Apr 1996 | DE |
06-180758 | Jun 1994 | JP |
07-101885 | Apr 1995 | JP |
H0877347 | Mar 1996 | JP |
08-153032 | Jun 1996 | JP |
09-287217 | Nov 1997 | JP |
H09325759 | Dec 1997 | JP |
10-134198 | May 1998 | JP |
11-190447 | Jul 1999 | JP |
11-195132 | Jul 1999 | JP |
2000148695 | May 2000 | JP |
2003-178294 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2005-182547 | Jul 2005 | JP |
100262453 | Aug 2000 | KR |
413766 | Dec 2000 | TW |
436710 | May 2001 | TW |
442734 | Jun 2001 | TW |
0013145 | Mar 2000 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Alpha Testing State”; http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/directx9—c/directx/graphics/programmingguide/GettingStarted/Direct3Kdevices/States/renderstates/alphatestingstate.asp Mar. 25, 2005. |
“Anti-aliasing”; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-aliasing; Mar. 27, 2006. |
“Vertex Fog”; http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/directx9—cVertex—fog.asp?frame=true Mar. 27, 2006. |
A Hardware Assisted Design Rule Check Architecture Larry Seller Jan. 1982 Proceedings of the 19th Conference on Design Automation DAC '82 Publisher: IEEE Press. |
A Parallel Alogorithm for Polygon Rasterization Juan Pineda Jun. 1988 ACM. |
A VLSI Architecture for Updating Raster-Scan Displays Satish Gupta, Robert F. Sproull, Ivan E. Sutherland Aug. 1981 ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques SIGGRAPH '81, vol. 15 Issue Publisher: ACM Press. |
Blythe, OpenGL section 3.4.1, Basic Line Segment Rasterization, Mar. 29, 1997, pp. 1-3. |
Boyer, et al.; “Discrete Analysis for Antialiased Lines,” Eurographics 2000; 3 Pages. |
Brown, Brian; “Data Structure And Number Systems”; 2000; http://www.ibilce.unesp.br/courseware/datas/data3.htm. |
Crow; “The Use of Grayscale for Improves Raster Display of Vectors and Characters;” University of Texas, Austin, Texas; Work supported by the National Science Foundation unser Grants MCS 76-83889; pp. 1-5: ACM Press, 1978. |
Definition of “block” from FOLDOC, http://foldoc.org/index.cgi?block, Sep. 23, 2004. |
Definition of “first-in first-out” from FOLDOC, http://foldoc.org/index.cgi?query=fifo&action=Search, Dec. 6, 1999. |
Definition of “queue” from Free on-Line Dictionary of Computing (FOLDOC), http://foldoc.org/index.cgi?query=queue&action=Search, May 15, 2007. |
Definition of “Slot,” http://www.thefreedictionary.com/slot, Oct. 2, 2012 . |
Dictionary of Computers, Information Processing & Technology, 2nd Edition , 1984. |
Duca et al., A Relational Debugging Engine for Graphics Pipeline, International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, ACM SIGGRAPH 2005, pp. 453-463, ISSN: 0730-0301. |
Fisher, Joseph A., Very Long Instruction Word Architecture and the ELI-512, ACM, 1993, pp. 140-150. |
FOLDOC (Free On-Line Dictionary of Computing), definition of X86, Feb. 27, 2004. |
FOLDOC, definition of “frame buffer”, from foldoc.org/index.cgi?query=frame+buffer&action=Search, Oct. 3, 1997. |
FOLDOC, definition of “motherboard”, from foldoc.org/index.cgi?query=motherboard&action=Search, Aug. 10, 2000. |
FOLDOC, definition of “separate compilation”, from foldoc.org/index.cgi?query=separate+compilation&action=Search, Feb. 19, 2005. |
FOLDOC, definition of “superscalar”, http://foldoc.org/, Jun. 22, 2009. |
FOLDOC, definition of “vector processor”, http://foldoc.org/, Sep. 11, 2003. |
FOLDOC, definition of Pentium, Sep. 30, 2003. |
FOLDOC, Free Online Dictionary of Computing, definition of SIMD, foldoc.org/index.cgi?query=simd&action=Search, Nov. 4, 1994. |
Foley, J. “Computer Graphics: Principles and Practice”, 1987, Addison-Wesley Publishing, 2nd Edition, p. 545-546. |
Free On-Line Dictionary of Computing (FOLDOC), definition of “video”, from foldoc.org/index.cgi?query=video&action=Search, May 23, 2008. |
Fuchs; “Fast Spheres Shadow, Textures, Transparencies, and Image Enhancements in Pixel-Planes”; ACM; 1985; Department of Computer Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27514. |
Gadre, S., Patent Application Entitled “Separately Schedulable Condition Codes for a Video Processor”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/267,793, filed Nov. 4, 2005. |
Gadre, S., Patent Application Entitled “Stream Processing in a Video Processor”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/267,599, filed Nov. 4, 2005. |
Gadre, S., Patent Application Entitled “Video Processor Having Scalar and Vector Components With Command FIFO for Passing Function Calls From Scalar to Vector”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/267,700, filed Nov. 4, 2005. |
gDEBugger, graphicRemedy, http://www.gremedy.com, Aug. 8, 2006. |
Graf, Rudolf F., Modern Dictionary of Electronics, Howard W. Sams & Company, 1984, pp. 566. |
Graf, Rudolf F., Modern Dictionary of Electronics, Howard W. Sams & Company, 1988, pp. 273. |
Graham, Susan L. et al., Getting Up to Speed: The future of Supercomputing, the National Academies Press, 2005, glossary. |
Graston et al. (Software Pipelining Irregular Loops On the TMS320C6000 VLIW DSP Architecture); Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN workshop on Languages, compilers and tools for embedded systems; pp. 138-144; Year of Publication: 2001. |
Hamacher, V. Carl et l., Computer Organization, Second Edition, McGraw Hill, 1984, pp. 1-9. |
Heirich; Optimal Automatic Multi-pass Shader Partitioning by Dynamic Programming; Eurographics-Graphics Hardware (2005); Jul. 2005. |
HPL-PD A Parameterized Research Approach—May 31, 2004 http://web.archive.org/web/*/www.trimaran.org/docs/5—hpl-pd.pdf. |
Hutchins E., SC10: A Video Processor and Pixel-Shading GPU for Handheld Devices; presented at the Hot Chips conferences on Aug. 23, 2004. |
IBM TDB, Device Queue Management, vol. 31 Iss. 10, pp. 45-50, Mar. 1, 1989. |
Intel, Intel Architecture Software Developer's Manual, vol. 1: Basic Architecture 1997 p. 8-1. |
Intel, Intel Architecture Software Developer's Manual, vol. 1: Basic Architecture 1999 p. 8-1, 9-1. |
Intel, Intel MMX Technology at a Glance, Jun. 1997. |
Intel, Intel Pentium III Xeon Processor at 500 and 550 Mhz, Feb. 1999. |
Intel, Pentium Processor Family Developer's Manual, 1997, pp. 2-13. |
Intel, Pentium processor with MMX Technology at 233Mhz Performance Brief, Jan. 1998, pp. 3 and 8. |
Rosenberg, Jerry M., Dictionary of Computers, Information Processing & Telecommunications, 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, 1987, pp. 102 and 338. |
Merriam-Webster Dictionary Online; Definition for “program”; retrieved Dec. 14, 2010. |
Rosenberg, Jerry M., Dictionary of Computers, Information Processing & Telecommunications, 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, 1987, pp. 305. |
Woods J., Nvidia GeForce FX Preview, at http://www.tweak3d.net/reviews/nvidia/nv30preview/1.shtml; dated 11/18/202; retrieved Jun. 16, 2011. |
Wilson D., Nvidia's Tiny 90nm G71 and G73: GeForce 7900 Debut; at http://www.anantech.com/show/1967/2; dated Sep. 3, 2006, retrieved Jun. 16, 2011. |
NVIDIA Corporation, Technical Brief: Transform and Lighting; dated 1999; month unknown. |
Parhami, Behrooz, Computer Arithmetic: Algorithms and Hardware Designs, Oxford University Press, Jun. 2000, pp. 413-418. |
Pcreview, article entitled “What is a Motherboard”, from www.pcreview.co.uk/articles/Hardware/What—is—a—Motherboard., Nov. 22, 2005. |
Quinnell, Richard A. “New DSP Architectures Go “Post-Harvard” for Higher Performance and Flexibility” Techonline; posted May 1, 2002. |
SearchStorage.com Definitions, “Pipelining Burst Cache,” Jul. 31, 2001, url: http://searchstorage.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,,sid5—gci214414,00.html. |
Wikipedia, definition of “scalar processor”, Apr. 4, 2009. |
Wikipedia, entry page defining term “SIMD”, last modified Mar. 17, 2007. |
Wikipedia, definition of Multiplication, accessed from en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Multiplication&oldid=1890974, published Oct. 13, 2003. |
Wikipedia, definition of “subroutine”, published Nov. 29, 2003, four pages. |
Wikipedia, definition of “vector processor”, http://en.wikipedia.org/, May 14, 2007. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090273606 A1 | Nov 2009 | US |