1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to portable communication devices such as cell phones, smart phones and similar handheld devices, and improvements thereto. In particular, this invention provides improvements in antennas and RF shielding of such devices, facing a direction away from the user, to redirecting RF radiation away from the body of a user.
2. Background
Design requirements of cellular phones and smart phones are placing an ever increasing premium on the available space within these devices as their functions become more diverse, ranging from the original basic function as a wireless telephone to a music player, video player, handheld computer, wireless internet device for browsing the web, retrieving email and downloading or uploading files, a still camera, a video camera, a GPS device, a navigation system, etc. These functions bring with them greatly increased demands upon the antenna and generally requires more radiation power for transmission, which must serve up to five frequency bands while occupying less space than ever before available for the antenna.
In addition, RF radiation from mobile phones is becoming of greater concern as a health risk, and addressing this issue in the design of the antenna while the space within the phone is reduced poses a particularly difficult challenge, as the only effective methods of significantly reducing RF radiation in the direction of the user, while allowing full power RF signal away from the user, require some additional space for the antenna.
The FCC requires limiting the radiation from a portable communication device (such as a mobile or cellular telephone) that is directed towards a user's head (Specific Absorption Rate, or SAR). Each year the FCC tends to lower the permitted level further. One of the reasons is safety. At the same time, as wireless communications technology advances, the mobile phone device has taken on the function of a hand-held computer with more data-intensive functions, requiring high rates of data transfer between the cell phone and the base station tower. It would be beneficial to the improved function of cell phones to be able to increase the power output of the antenna, but FCC regulations will not allow increased SAR.
The Smart Phone (e.g. iPhone, BlackBerry, etc.), for example, has an internal antenna(s) located at both the lower and upper parts of the phone, bordering the display area. The space for an antenna is usually limited to 1 cm times the width and thickness of the phone. The antenna is situated close to the back surface of the phone, on the side opposite to the user.
According to a first embodiment, a method of coupling radiation from the antenna inside a wireless phone to a location outside the device where the distribution of radiation can be better managed. It presents several methods of directing RF radiation away from the user's head by the appropriate placement of metallic loops, directors and other parasitic elements. This can take the form of arrays of monopole and dipole antennas, conducting loops and conducting plates with insulators or dielectrics. The general concept is to couple the radiation from the internal antenna on the side facing the user to the opposite side to direct such radiation outward away from the user.
In one preferred embodiment of the invention, external coupling antennas are provided to couple radiation from the internal antenna of a wireless device and to redirect the radiation such that there is minimum radiation towards the user and maximum radiation away from the user. It is important to note that this coupling method does not require an actual physical connection between the external coupling antennas and the antenna internal to the phone. However the position of the coupling antenna with respect to the internal antenna is critical. Through a series of coupling loops, directing elements or patch antennas located on a cover or case, a “clip” structure, or directly on an external surface of the mobile device, the radiation is further directed away from the user's head (which is absorptive) to the environment for communication to cell towers.
The materials used for coupling and re-directional elements are generally made out of materials of high electrical conductivity. However dielectric materials are also used to achieve optimal physical sizes and spacing of various elements.
The above methodology is illustrated by the treatment of two exemplary wireless devices—the Apple 3G iPhone and the RIM Blackberry Curve 8300. However the procedure is perfectly general and can be applied to any wireless device using different combinations of the elements described.
Referring to
One variation of the above design is in the replacement of an uppermost radiation re-director by a single plate 3 as illustrated in
Another variation, illustrated in
A further embodiment is the use of vertical strips 2 that are orthogonal to the horizontal strips 1, as shown in
For some wireless communication devices, such as the Blackberry 8300 shown in
In another embodiment of the invention shown in
The corrugations generally should have sizes smaller than wavelengths of microwave frequencies transmitted from the wireless device. They therefore introduce scattering wave vectors that are greater than the incident wave vector in directions perpendicular to the incident wave vector. The purpose of the design of the corrugations is to deflect the radiation away from the user and at the same time avoid creating reflections back on the internal radiating antenna; as a result the impedance seen by the output amplifier of the wireless device, e.g. the cell phone, is not affected and the total radiated power of the phone is not reduced, while SAR is significantly reduced.
In this embodiment, the loop 4 and the directors 6 are positioned relative to the internal antenna 5 such that the loop is close to the antenna and couples the RF power out from the back of the phone and up to the directors 6.
As shown in
The redirection of RF radiation away from the user's head also may be achieved by the use of a properly located passive RF coupling redirector 4-6 as shown in
A main feature of this invention, both as a passive directional beam antenna alone, or in combination with a passive re-directional shield, incorporated in an external case for a wireless phone, or such combination incorporated internally in a wireless phone device, is that the invention directs/redirects radiation away from the user, out of the phone, reducing SAR (Specific Absorption Rate), without adversely affecting TRP (Total Radiated Power). It does this with a directional antenna, or a combination of a directional antenna and re-directive shield, or with a re-directive shield only, integrated within a case of non-conducting or low-conductive materials (variously of silicone, plastic, cloth, etc.) that allow EM waves to propagate outward toward the cell phone tower without suffering any attenuation.
A further alternate embodiment of the RF coupling radiation redirector is shown in
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/724,290, entitled “RF RADIATION REDIRECTION AWAY FROM PORTABLE COMMUNICATION DEVICE USER,” filed on Mar. 15, 2010, which claims priority to and the benefit of Provisional Application No. 61/160,282, filed Mar. 13, 2009, both of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/724,290 is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/614,132, filed Nov. 6, 2009, which claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/112,141, filed Nov. 6, 2008 and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/158,551, filed Mar. 9, 2009, all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5278571 | Helfrick | Jan 1994 | A |
5338896 | Danforth | Aug 1994 | A |
5550552 | Oxley | Aug 1996 | A |
5711014 | Crowley et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5726383 | Geller et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5777261 | Katz | Jul 1998 | A |
5787340 | Sepponen | Jul 1998 | A |
6031495 | Simmons et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6082535 | Mitchell | Jul 2000 | A |
6249256 | Luxon et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6341217 | Wong | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6359213 | Long | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6492957 | Carillo, Jr. et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6515223 | Tashjian | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6568576 | Godshaw et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6576832 | Svarfvar et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6603430 | Hill et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6603981 | Carillo, Jr. et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6615026 | Wong | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6677906 | Quinn et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6711387 | Lungley | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6768523 | Cheng et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6855883 | Matsui | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6856819 | Itoh | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6871079 | Choi et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6880737 | Bauer | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6924770 | Carpenter et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6947000 | Ito | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6950674 | Jarrett | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6980777 | Shepherd et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6985110 | Tanaka et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7031762 | Shoji et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7065379 | Kim et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7164933 | Steigerwald et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7202825 | Leizerovich et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7203533 | Tischer | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7206618 | Latto | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7230574 | Johnson | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7327841 | Schreiber et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7494069 | Shimada | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7541986 | Park | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7812770 | Qi et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
8068061 | Qi et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8208980 | Wong et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8214003 | Wong et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8325094 | Ayala Vazquez et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8442602 | Wong et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
20020009976 | Rashidi | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020074142 | Katz | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020183013 | Auckland et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020193136 | Halkosaari et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030078037 | Auckland et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040014506 | Kemppinen | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20050079820 | Yamashita | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050104782 | Peled et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050195119 | Gaucher et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060019696 | Brunel et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060022889 | Chiang et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060232483 | Iwai et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060290575 | Pelzer | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070004456 | Shimada | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070241977 | Vance | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080007468 | Sato et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080165064 | Hill et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080316111 | Aoyama et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090124215 | Nysen | May 2009 | A1 |
20090156151 | Anguera et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090318094 | Pros et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100033383 | Yamamoto | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100097286 | Morrow et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100113111 | Wong et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100214180 | Krogerus | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100216520 | Lee | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100234081 | Wong et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100291965 | Tabe | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110012794 | Schlub et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110036912 | Guo et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110109515 | Rao | May 2011 | A1 |
20110140982 | Ozden et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120044115 | McCaughey et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120074231 | Jain et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120309472 | Wong et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130109435 | McCaughey et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130252677 | Wong et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130286582 | Dabov et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140057686 | McCaughey et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1918745 | Feb 2007 | CN |
1 292 042 | Mar 2003 | EP |
1 835 562 | Sep 2007 | EP |
1 942 580 | Jul 2008 | EP |
WO 00013330 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0135487 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 02095867 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO 03028424 | Apr 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/491,747, mailed Sep. 7, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/659,595, filed Oct. 24, 2012. |
Patent Examination Report No. 1 for Australian Application No. 2009313338, mailed Mar. 6, 2013. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2012/062995, mailed Mar. 8, 2013. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/614,132, mailed Oct. 20, 2011. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/614,132, mailed Mar. 1, 2012. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/724,290, mailed Nov. 9, 2011. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2009/063618, mailed Mar. 1, 2010. |
First Office Action for Chinese Application No. 200910221262.X, issued May 3, 2013. |
Second Office Action for Chinese Application No. 200910221262.X, issued Nov. 22, 2013. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/894,039, mailed Jul. 25, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/071,197, filed Nov. 4, 2013. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/287,680, mailed Apr. 2, 2014. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/894,039, mailed Jan. 13, 2014. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/071,197, mailed Mar. 20, 2014. |
Third Office Action for Chinese Application No. 200910221262.X, mailed Mar. 27, 2014. |
Patent Examination Report No. 2 for Australian Application No. 2009313338, mailed Mar. 11, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120242549 A1 | Sep 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61160282 | Mar 2009 | US | |
61112141 | Nov 2008 | US | |
61158551 | Mar 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12724290 | Mar 2010 | US |
Child | 13492518 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12614132 | Nov 2009 | US |
Child | 12724290 | US |