Patent Grant
10331923
The present invention relates generally to radio frequency identification (RFID) systems and devices. More particularly, the present disclosure relates to systems and devices for further confining and focusing radio frequency energy when applied with the use of RFID transponders that are moving in high speed linear motion through use of a conveyance to allow for the singulation of carton contents.
Radio frequency identification (RFID) tags are electronic devices that may be affixed to items whose presence is to be detected and/or monitored. The presence of an RFID tag, and therefore the presence of the item to which the RFID tag is affixed, may be checked and monitored by devices known as “readers” or “reader panels.” Readers typically transmit radio frequency signals to which the RFID tags respond. Each RFID tag can store a unique identification number. The RFID tags respond to reader-transmitted signals by providing their identification number and additional information stored on the RFID tag based on a reader command to enable the reader to determine identification and characteristics of an item.
Currently, the need for the ability to scan RFID transponders in automated environments has caused the creation of a scanning tunnel or enclosure (i.e., a RFID dynamic tunnel scanner). Different manufacturers may take different approaches to scanning these transponders. Typically, an enclosure uses a combination of absorber material to attenuate radio frequency energy and a read chamber central to the enclosure that projects a read zone. Thus, the read chamber uses an absorber method that directs the main flow of energy normal to the antenna plain, creating the read zone. However, although this does create a field or read zone, it does not allow for tuning of the read zone. Refinement (or tuning) of the leading edge signal of the read zone is critical to the success of reducing the overall gap or spacing required between cartons. Further, some degree of tuning can be done by means of power modulation to the antenna contained within the read chamber. However, this is only marginally effective as a function of the power decreases so does the effectiveness of the reader to energize the transponders.
Furthermore, the main challenge in utilizing a RFID dynamic tunnel scanner is the inability to capture all of the inlay/transponders applied to each individual item within a given carton. Specifically, spacing between cartons, speed of the conveyor equipment, power supplied by the RFID reader, among other parameters are all very difficult to manage to achieve a 100% read rate without creating over-read conditions whereby inlays from adjacent cartons upstream or downstream of the intended carton are read as well. The other end of the spectrum of course is not reading all of the tags properly. Typically, this is overcome by lowering power or tuning the solution to a specific inlay type. This can be done by filtering software data and using a probability model to take a “best guess” as to the completeness of a particular carton. This method may be acceptable to some end users but is limited as it assumes a level of inaccuracy, as it is based on a best guess of the volume of information fed to the model.
Another way to overcome this problem is tuning to a specific power setting for a particular inlay. However, this method may not work if the user utilizes multiple inlay types across their product portfolio. This use of multiple inlay types sets up a scanning requirement where potentially both high and low sensitivity tags are in use. In a manufacturing environment, it is common to use a single inlay as there is consistent product. However, in a distribution environment any number of carton sizes and item types can be moved through the system. This larger variety of product will most likely have a variety of two or more different inlay types. Thus, RFID dynamic scanning requires adaptability.
Another method is software filtering. This method of filtering may not work, because it does not preclude the reading of extraneous inlays that happen to be nearby. Thus, the system is forced to make a judgment whether or not to include the inlay or inlays that happen to be seen in the field as part of a carton count. As a result, intended inlays may not be included. Accordingly, this method depends exclusively on the software for “accuracy” verses a well-designed tunnel that provides superior isolation.
The present invention discloses a RFID dynamic tunnel scanner, which doesn't depend on software for accurate reads. Instead, the RFID dynamic tunnel scanner relies on the physics of carefully manipulated radio frequency energy. Further, the proposed RFID dynamic tunnel scanner provides adaptability to changing conditions in real-time, thus providing a greater ability of handling a large variety of inlay challenges now, as well as in the future.
The following presents a simplified summary in order to provide a basic understanding of some aspects of the disclosed innovation. This summary is not an extensive overview, and it is not intended to identify key/critical elements or to delineate the scope thereof. Its sole purpose is to present some concepts in a simplified form as a prelude to the more detailed description that is presented later.
The subject matter disclosed and claimed herein, in one aspect thereof, comprises a read chamber device for use within a radio frequency identification (RFID) scanning enclosure (or tunnel) which provides a means of reading a plurality of cartons moving through the enclosure via a conveyor belt. The RFID scanning enclosure is positioned over a section of the conveyor belt, such that the plurality of cartons on the conveyor belt pass directly through the RFID scanning enclosure. The read chamber device is positioned centrally to the enclosure and projects a read zone via an antenna positioned in-line with the flow of the conveyor which allows the read chamber to read a large variety of inlays without changing the configuration settings of the device.
In a preferred embodiment, the RFID scanning enclosure utilizes dynamic power indexing (DPI) to combine parameter inputs to create a smarter reader that can anticipate changes. Dynamic power indexing also provides a means to vary the parameters of the reader on the fly to handle a variety of carton sizes. Specifically, the method of dynamic power indexing can combine any number of inputs prior to the intended carton to be scanned. The reader is then manipulated in real-time to adapt to the needs of each carton and the tunnel scanning environment. The input parameters could be any combination of the following: Carton ID, TID, RSSI, Read Count, Inlay type, Power Level, Reader On Time, Delay, and conveyor speed. All of which are pre-processing steps that would be incorporated into setting the correct configuration pertaining to each target carton. The use of DPI augments the design of the RFID scanning enclosure which provides isolation and enhances intelligent decision making and adaptability.
To the accomplishment of the foregoing and related ends, certain illustrative aspects of the disclosed innovation are described herein in connection with the following description and the annexed drawings. These aspects are indicative, however, of but a few of the various ways in which the principles disclosed herein can be employed and is intended to include all such aspects and their equivalents. Other advantages and novel features will become apparent from the following detailed description when considered in conjunction with the drawings.
The innovation is now described with reference to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals are used to refer to like elements throughout. In the following description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding thereof. It may be evident, however, that the innovation can be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known structures and devices are shown in block diagram form in order to facilitate a description thereof.
The present invention discloses a read chamber device for use within a radio frequency identification (RFID) scanning enclosure which provides a means of reading a plurality of cartons moving through the enclosure via a conveyor belt. The enclosure is positioned over a section of the conveyor belt, such that the plurality of cartons on the conveyor belt pass directly through the enclosure. The read chamber device is positioned centrally to the enclosure and projects a read zone via an antenna positioned in-line with the flow of the conveyor which allows the read chamber to read a large variety of inlays without changing the configuration settings of the device. The RFID scanning enclosure also utilizes dynamic power indexing (DPI) to combine parameter inputs to create a smarter reader that can anticipate changes. The reader is then manipulated in real-time to adapt to the needs of each carton and the tunnel scanning environment. The use of DPI augments the design of the RFID scanning enclosure which provides isolation and enhances intelligent decision making and adaptability.
Referring initially to the drawings,
Once the plurality of cartons enters the enclosure 102 via conveyor belt 106, an antenna 108 projects radio frequency energy to create a read zone 110 for the reader. RFID tags (or transponders) on the cartons are energized and read in the read zone 110 by the reader and signals are transmitted back to the reader, identifying the carton and transmitting any other information the tags 112 might contain. One of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that using the enclosure 102 to read RFID tags on cartons is merely one possible example and the same system may be used for any application that involves a reading of any group of items that are streaming through a particular location. Thus, although the term “carton” is used throughout the present disclosure for exemplary purposes, the term “carton” may be any single item or a group of items.
The RFID scanning enclosure 102 can be any suitable size, shape, and configuration as is known in the art without affecting the overall concept of the invention. One of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the interior and/or exterior shape of the enclosure 102 as shown in
Further, the RFID scanning enclosure 102 comprises a tunnel throat (or opening) 114 wherein cartons 104 enter the enclosure 102 via the conveyor belt 106. The tunnel opening 114 is designed to deal with motility and movement of the conveyor belt 106 the products or cartons 104 are traveling on. For example, the tunnel opening can have a throat capacity of approximately 30″.
Furthermore, the scanning enclosure 102 projects a read zone 110 via at least one antenna 108. Specifically, a combination of different antenna sets are used which reduces the need for a bulky read chamber. Further, the antennas 108 are in-line with the flow of the conveyor, which allows the read chamber to read a large variety of inlays, and at the same configuration settings. The at least one antenna 108 of the present invention, in one embodiment, may be very thin profile antenna allowing integration into at least one wall of the enclosure. The at least one antenna may have a narrow beam width. Any suitable number of antennas 108 and/or combination of different antenna sets can be used as is known in the art, depending on the wants and needs of a user and the configuration of the enclosure 102. Further, any suitable type of antenna can be used as is known in the art, such as a wide angle antenna, linear, circular, air gap, narrow beam, and/or omni-directional antenna etc., depending on the wants and needs of a user and the configuration of the enclosure 102.
Additionally, a resistive sheet absorber technique which uses strategic placement internal to the structure is secured within the enclosure. The resistive sheet absorber material typically comprises a thin film material combined with a defined air gap, though any other suitable material can be used as is known in the art. Thus, energy projected (or leaked) to the sides of the antenna 108 is canceled through the use of the resistive sheet absorber material to create a fixed read zone 110. Accordingly, cartons (and their transponders or tags) entering the fixed read zone 110 are detected and read by the reader and information contained within the tags is transmitted to the reader.
Overall, the RFID scanning enclosure 102 comprises a smaller size form factor than the prior art scanning enclosures, and does not have a bulky read chamber. The RFID scanning enclosure 102 relies 100% on the physics of the RF field (or zone), not software filtering, and utilizes isolation to prevent both over-reads and stray reads outside the tunnel. The RF scanning enclosure 102 also comprises a multi-inlay read capability and higher read density. The RF scanning enclosure 102 utilizes a lamination bonding technique to eliminate the need for an internal or external frame or exoskeleton. The RF scanning enclosure 102 integrates a unique antenna design with a superior axial ratio. Further, the RF scanning enclosure 102 utilizes a resistive sheet absorber technique which uses strategic placement internal to the structure. An interior liner provides a contiguous clean smooth surface for both protection of components as well as avoids any potential catch points. The RF scanning enclosure 102 comprises an upper housing to house all electronic and micro control required hardware, and shielded cable routing to negate energy slipping through the interior pass-through. In one embodiment, antennas are mounted in strategic locations on at least one wall of the enclosure of the present invention. The absorber may reside on the outboard surfaces to attenuate stray signal from projecting outside enclosure.
Furthermore, the RFID scanning enclosure 102 utilizes dynamic power indexing (DPI) to combine very desperate inputs to create a smarter reader that can anticipate changes. Dynamic power indexing also provides a means to vary the parameters of the reader on the fly to handle extremes of packaging from high density item packs to small light weight items as well as the variety of carton sizes. Thus, DPI takes a more proactive approach to understanding what is about to be scanned and adjusting the system for each cartons needs. Specifically, the method of dynamic power indexing can combine any number of inputs prior to the intended carton to be scanned. The reader is then manipulated in real-time to adapt to the needs of each carton and the tunnel scanning environment.
Typically, a reader is set to one power setting, and in many cases end users choose to operate at full allowable RF power and are then forced to increase the gaps between cartons. This also requires a user to physically isolate surrounding inventory, and to use software models in the background to attempt to achieve accurate counts. However, even with the use of software models, stray reads are still inevitable, and productivity throughput is typically very slow as larger gaps require more time to process goods.
The use of DPI augments the design of the RFID scanning enclosure 102 which provides isolation and enhances intelligent decision making and adaptability. DPI combines any number of inputs to change the reader settings in real-time to provide optimum read conditions for each specific carton. The reader is then tuned to the needs and characteristics of each individual carton. The input parameters could be any combination of the following: Carton ID, TID, RSSI, Read Count, Inlay type, Power Level, Reader On Time, Delay, and conveyor speed. All of which are pre-processing steps that would be incorporated to setting the correct configuration pertaining to each target carton. Some of these tasks can be done with a micro controller feeding an RFID reader. Another method is to use the GPIO functionality of the reader itself to take in inputs. Another alternative is to incorporate an upstream antenna/reader dedicated to this preprocessor task.
The following is a description of the parameters and their uses in the process. For example, TID, which represents the chip manufacturer's unique serial number can be used as a parameter. Although it is possible the same chip manufacturer type could be used in multiple inlays, it is unlikely if differing size labels are used, so this parameter could be used as a supplemental feed verses a primary determiner of settings. Further, knowing the TID does provide insight as to the read sensitivity of the chip no matter what the inlay type may be, allowing for adjustments in power level up or down as needed by that chip's characteristics. For example, slower responding chips may need more time or more energy saturation to achieve complete reads.
Another parameter is carton size. This parameter is not the actual carton size but the virtual carton size as represented by the movement of a carton on a conveyor, which are two very different things to consider. Actual carton size represents the measured values of the corrugate as measured by a tape measure. Virtual carton size is measured by edge trigger sensing and combined with the actual speed of the conveyor to determine the real size of the box as would be seen by the tunnel system. Virtual carton size helps take into account the inherent slippage that occurs when cartons are moving on a conveyor. It also helps factor for the variance in actual speed as a result of varying carton weights thus possibly making the carton appear longer or shorter than it really is.
Another parameter is (RSSI) Receive Signal Sensitivity Indicator, which is a rough gauge of how the reader perceives the inlays that are within its field of influence. This has proven to be a parameter that cannot be relied on exclusively for tuning a dynamic system but is a great asset to act as a supplemental feed for building a configuration. RSSI could be used to set base line thresholds to weed out questionable inlays or carton packing inaccuracies.
Another parameter is read count, which is the number of times each individual inlay is seen by the reader while in the RF field. Again this would be a strong parameter in combination with other parameters such as RSSI to determine speed or power level settings.
The parameter of Carton ID has multiple roles. It can be the most powerful parameter but most data records in customer databases do not currently contain fields that include the other parameters in the listing. Using the Carton ID will allow a predetermination of what should be in the box and how many (i.e., the quantity). Additionally, the Carton ID could provide information on what type of label/tag/inlay should be attached to those items. It could also inform the Dynamic Power Indexing software what types of items in relation to composition and density that should be expected. Further, it may also provide critical information as to anticipate pack density such as loose fill or densely packed denim for example.
Another supplemental parameter that goes one step above the TID is inlay type. Inlay type helps to provide feedback on whether the tag being used is very robust with good omni-directional capability or is a very orientation sensitive tag. Further, this parameter can have a big impact on how the reader is configured to deal with easily read inlays verses inlays requiring a properly polarized field.
Further, power or power level is a primary parameter fed to the reader in real-time based on the other parameters that have been feed into a calculation. Typically, power needs can vary greatly per carton. The Reader On Time parameter is essentially the burst duration when the read cycle is turned on. This can vary greatly based on all the parameters fed to the system to determine best setting. For example, small measured boxes may only require a very short burst of energy while in the field, whereas longer boxes need a longer duration. Reader On Time can also be a function of what is inside the carton. Higher density contents may require longer Reader On Time to energize and capture all the tags.
The Timing parameter is a calculation based on the total pre-read read cycle. Time is a function of the distance of where the pre-read analysis takes place before entering the tunnel. Specifically, how far upstream and how much time does it take before the carton is delivered? The Delay parameter is the amount of delay needed from the time the edge of the carton is seen to the time the reader is activated to read tags in a carton. Delay may be a function of what the dynamic algorithm indicates or a fixed value. Further, Delay determines the distance the carton has moved into the field (read zone) before the read session is turned on.
Conveyor control is another parameter that can be advantageous. If gap sequencing is used, this parameter can assist with the metering aspect. The value that is used can then be fed into the overall algorithm determining reader configuration settings. The Conveyor speed parameter, which is the value of obtaining and knowing the accurate speed measurement of the conveyor speed should not be discounted. A wide variety of situations can influence the real speed of the conveyor. For example, true slew rate, load bearing, inherent slippage, power (brown out), and variable speed adjustment are but some of the factors changing the perceived size of any given carton.
With edge sensing upstream of the actual tunnel, the Carton Gap parameter can be added to make adjustments to the system where typically a minimum gap standard has to be set as carton spacing is unknown. Typically, systems are designed with leading edge to leading edge physical measurements wherein minimum gaps are determined by the largest carton size. However, this does not account for smaller carton sizes that increase gaps where higher power settings could be used for the RFID scanning solutions advantage.
The use of DPI does not imply that all of the parameters listed above are all inclusive. Other parameters not listed may be employed with DPI as they come available with ever evolving technology refreshes. However, DPI does imply that through the use of the Dynamic Power Indexing technique a superior dynamic RFID scanning environment can be created and configured in real-time to meet the specific criteria required to match the specific needs of each carton and their respective items tagged with inlays contained within.
Specifically, software would be developed to encompass all listed parameters and a user would choose what combination of parameters to use to achieve the highest performance for the given infrastructure conditions. The DPI method also allows the possibility of narrower gaps or even the ability to deal with varying gaps between cartons verses a minimum fixed index value.
What has been described above includes examples of the claimed subject matter. It is, of course, not possible to describe every conceivable combination of components or methodologies for purposes of describing the claimed subject matter, but one of ordinary skill in the art may recognize that many further combinations and permutations of the claimed subject matter are possible. Accordingly, the claimed subject matter is intended to embrace all such alterations, modifications and variations that fall within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. Furthermore, to the extent that the term “includes” is used in either the detailed description or the claims, such term is intended to be inclusive in a manner similar to the term “comprising” as “comprising” is interpreted when employed as a transitional word in a claim.
The present application is a divisional application of and claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 14/735,736 filed Jun. 10, 2015, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3693079 | Walker | Sep 1972 | A |
| 3849633 | Reitboeck et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
| 3994505 | Balha | Nov 1976 | A |
| 4350883 | Lagarde | Sep 1982 | A |
| 5041826 | Milheiser | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5196682 | Englehardt | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5310784 | Ide et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5689239 | Turner | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5729697 | Schkolnick et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5815252 | Price-Francis | Sep 1998 | A |
| 6107921 | Eberhardt et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6145742 | Drexler | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6218942 | Vega et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6371375 | Ackley et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6435407 | Fiordelisi | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6946951 | Cole et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6949951 | Young et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 6967579 | Elizondo | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 7323996 | Mullins | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7345635 | Hohler | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7425896 | Kawamata | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7468670 | Liu et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7696882 | Rahimi et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
| 7942323 | Brod et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7997486 | Ulrich | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8093989 | Deolaliker | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8149094 | Deoalikar | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8274390 | Blake | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8384521 | Matsen et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8496166 | Burns et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8576051 | Hansen | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8604981 | Ehlen | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8901205 | Yang et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 9208362 | Fink | Dec 2015 | B1 |
| 9830486 | Roth | Nov 2017 | B2 |
| 10094855 | Fuhr et al. | Oct 2018 | B1 |
| 20010015380 | Good et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010022559 | Takahashi et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20010050654 | Killen et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020070862 | Francis et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020180588 | Erickson et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020183882 | Dearing et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030085267 | Piotrowski et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030189490 | Hogerton et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20040032443 | Moylan et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040084526 | Knowles et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040113850 | Olsen | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040153379 | Joyce et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040172160 | O'Dougherty et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040196143 | Crump et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20050012613 | Eckstein et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050068161 | Ichinose et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050110641 | Mendolia et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050218219 | Sano et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050253687 | Martinez et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20060004484 | Hornbaker et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060043177 | Nycz et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060043179 | Nycz et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060071070 | Maier | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060080819 | McAllister | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060170556 | Fang | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060187041 | Olsen et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060208072 | Ku et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060287759 | Charych | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070013485 | Edwards et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070030150 | Mullins | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070080804 | Hirahara et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070126578 | Broussard | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070135961 | Ishida et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070185613 | Feldenzer | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070254587 | Schadler et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070279311 | Kai et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080011836 | Adema et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080018475 | Breed et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080061984 | Breed et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080094179 | Domenico et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080122623 | Hause et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080185540 | Turner et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080213498 | Drzal et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080231431 | Stawar et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080237339 | Stawar et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20090033493 | Lin et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090039147 | Yamamoto et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090079565 | Mackenzie et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090160646 | Mackenzie et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090237217 | Ohkubo et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20100217678 | Goncalves | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100237999 | Hilgers | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20110025569 | Payne | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110068992 | Payne | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110095866 | Karr | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110106681 | Cockerell | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20120019364 | Reichenbach et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120075073 | Fislage | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120075074 | Frosch et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120149300 | Forster | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120161937 | Chen | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120256732 | McAllister | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20130141222 | Garcia | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130342322 | Hinman et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140158766 | Paske et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140184391 | Elizondo, II | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140292499 | Zhang et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20150029001 | Pleshek et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150127362 | DeBusk et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150136849 | Bremer et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20160117530 | Roth | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160117534 | Roth | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 100573545 | Dec 2009 | CN |
| 102424228 | Apr 2012 | CN |
| 202193383 | Apr 2012 | CN |
| 2000005674 | Feb 2000 | WO |
| 2007104339 | Sep 2007 | WO |
| 2009002156 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Fraunhofer IFF: “RFID Tunnel Gates for Reliable Bulk Reading”, Retrieved from the internet: http://www.iff.fraunhofer.de/content/dam/iff/en/documents/publications/rfid-tunnel-gates-for-reliable-bulk-reading-fraunhofer-iff.pdf [retrieved on Mar. 5, 2014]. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20180165488 A1 | Jun 2018 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14735736 | Jun 2015 | US |
| Child | 15892025 | US |
