Rheology modifiers for encapsulating quantum dots

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10889675
  • Patent Number
    10,889,675
  • Date Filed
    Friday, May 12, 2017
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 12, 2021
    3 years ago
Abstract
A polymer resin comprising: (a) quantum dots, (b) a compound of formula (I) (I) wherein R1 is hydrogen or methyl and R2 is a C6-C20 aliphatic polycyclic substituent, and (c) a block or graft copolymer having Mn from 50,000 to 400,000 and comprising from 10 to 100 wt % polymerized units of styrene and from 0 to 90 wt % of a non-styrene block; wherein the non-styrene block has a van Krevelen solubility parameter from 15.0 to 17.5 (J/cm3)1/2.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to rheology modifiers useful in a process for preparing a multilayer polymer composite containing quantum dots.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Semiconductor quantum dots (QD) provide optical absorption and emission (photoluminescence PL or electroluminescence EL) behaviors that are significantly different from those of bulk materials. As the particle size decreases, effective energy bandgap (Eg), or available energy levels, increases and creates a blue shifted PL spectrum. This spectrum tunability by the particle size dependent quantum confinement effect within the same material is a critical advantage over conventional bulk semiconductors. Because of their unique optical properties, QD have been of great interest in many display and lighting applications. Most QD have inorganic shells with a larger bandgap material to confine electron and hole pairs within the core region and prevent any surface charge states. The outer shells are then capped by organic ligands to reduce trap states of the shell that can lead to reduced quantum yield (QY). Organic ligands help QD to disperse in organic/aqueous solvents. Typical organic ligands surrounding QD have relatively long alkyl chains which provide high solubility in non-polar solvents or monomers. Unfortunately, QD are very susceptible to photo-oxidation during light absorption/conversion process. Also, moisture can have similar impacts when ligands are not compatible. QD typically are encapsulated in a polymer matrix to protect them from adverse effects of water and oxygen. For example, US2010/0084629 discloses a variety of polymers as encapsulants. However, this reference does not disclose the polymer compositions described herein.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides a polymer resin comprising:


(a) quantum dots,


(b) a compound of formula (I)




embedded image



wherein R1 is hydrogen or methyl and R2 is a C6-C20 aliphatic polycyclic substituent, and


(c) a block or graft copolymer having Mn from 50,000 to 400,000 and comprising from 10 to 100 wt % polymerized units of styrene and from 0 to 90 wt % of a non-styrene block; wherein the non-styrene block has a van Krevelen solubility parameter from 15.0 to 17.5 (J/cm3)1/2.


The present invention further provides a polymer resin comprising:


(a) quantum dots,


(b) a compound of formula (I), and


(c) a homopolymer or random copolymer with Mn greater than polymer critical molecular weight, Mc and with a van Krevelen solubility parameter from 16.5 to 20.0 (J/cm3)1/2.







DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Percentages are weight percentages (wt %) and temperatures are in ° C., unless specified otherwise. Operations were performed at room temperature (20-25° C.), unless specified otherwise. Boiling points are measured at atmospheric pressure (ca. 101 kPa). “(Meth)acrylate” means acrylate or methacrylate. Quantum dots are well known in the art, see, e.g., US2012/0113672. Number-average molecular weight, Mn, is measured by size exclusion chromatography. A hydrocarbon polymer is a polymer having no more than 5 wt % of elements other than hydrogen and carbon, preferably no more than 3 wt %, preferably no more than 1 wt %, percentages based on dry weight of the entire polymer.


The van Krevelen solubility parameter is described by Bicerano (Prediction of Polymer Properties, 3rd edition, Marcel Dekker, New York, 2002, Chapter 5) and tabulated in Table 5.2 (“δ2”) of the same book for a number of commercially relevant polymers. For an arbitrary polymer with known monomer chemical structure, van Krevelen-type solubility parameter can be computed using algorithms outlined in the same reference or using Materials Studio software, Synthia module (http://accelrys.com/products/collaborative-science/biovia-materials-studio/polymers-and-classical-simulation-software.html). For random copolymers, the copolymer solubility parameter can be calculated as weight-average of the solubility parameters of its comonomers.


Critical molecular weight, Mc, is calculated as described by Bicerano (Prediction of Polymer Properties, 3-rd edition, Marcel Dekker, New York, 2002, Chapters 11 and 13). For example, for polystyrene (PS), Mc=30 kg/mol, for poly(methylmethacrylate) (PMMA), Mc=18 kg/mol, etc. For an arbitrary polymer with known monomer chemical structure, critical molecular weight can be computed using algorithms outlined in the same reference or using Materials Studio software, Synthia module (http://accelrys.com/products/collaborative-science/biovia-materials-studio/polymers-and-classical-simulation-software.html).


In one preferred embodiment of the invention, a polymer composite made using the resin of this invention is part of a multilayer assembly which also comprises an outer layer on each side of the polymer composite. Preferably, the outer layer is an oxygen bather which also inhibits passage of moisture. Preferably, the outer layer comprises a polymer film, preferably one comprising polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyaryletherketones, polyimides, polyolefins, polycarbonate, polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), polystyrene, or a combination thereof. Preferably, the outer layer further comprises oxides or nitrides, preferably silicon oxides, titanium dioxide, aluminum oxide, silicon nitrides or a combination thereof. Preferably the oxides or nitrides are coated on the surface of the polymer film facing the QD layer. Preferably, each outer layer comprises a polymer film having a thickness from 25 to 150 microns (preferably 50 to 100 microns) and an oxide/nitride layer having a thickness from 10 to 100 nm (preferably 30 to 70 nm). In some preferred embodiments of the invention, the outer layer comprises at least two polymer film layers and/or at least two oxide/nitride layers; different layers may be of differing composition. Preferably, the outer layers have a very low oxygen transmission rate (OTR, <10−1 cc/m2/day) and low water vapor transmission rate (WVTR, <10−2 g/m2/day). Preferably, the polymer film in the outer layers has a Tg from 60 to 200° C.; preferably at least 90° C., preferably at least 100° C.


Preferably, the thickness of the polymer composite of this invention is from 10 to 500 microns, preferably at least 20 microns, preferably at least 30 microns, preferably at least 40 microns; preferably no greater than 400 microns, preferably no greater than 300 microns, preferably no greater than 200 microns, preferably no greater than 150 microns. Preferably, the thickness of each outer layer is from 20 to 100 microns, preferably from 25 to 75 microns


Preferably, the polymer composite of this invention is prepared by free radical polymerization of the resin prepared by mixing monomers, QD and other optional additives. Preferably, the resin is coated on a first outer layer prior to curing by typical methods, e.g., spin coating, slot die coating, gravure, ink jet and spray coating. Preferably, curing is initiated by exposing the resin to ultraviolet light or heat, preferably ultraviolet light, preferably in the UVA range.


Preferably, R2 is a C7-C17 aliphatic polycyclic substituent, preferably R2 is a C8-C15 aliphatic polycyclic substituent. Preferably, R2 is a bridged polycyclic substituent; preferably a bicyclic, tricyclic or tetracyclic substituent; preferably a bicyclic or tricyclic substituent. Preferably, R2 is a saturated aliphatic substituent. Preferred structures for R2 include, e.g., adamantanes, bicyclo[2,2,1]alkanes, bicyclo[2,2,2]alkanes, bicyclo[2,1,1]alkanes and tricyclodecanes (e.g., tricyclo[5,2,1,026]decane); these structures may be substituted with alkyl, alkoxy groups, hydroxy groups or (meth)acrylate esters (i.e., the compound of formula (I) may have at least two (meth)acrylate ester substituents; preferably no more than two); preferably alkyl and alkoxy groups have from one to six carbon atoms, preferably one to four. Tricyclodecanes and bicyclo[2,2,1]alkanes are especially preferred, particularly tricyclo[5,2,1,026]decane, dimethanol dimethacrylate and isobornyl acrylate. More than one compound of formula (I) may be present in the resin. Preferably, the resin comprises a compound of formula (I) having one (meth)acrylate ester substituent and a compound of formula (I) having two (meth)acrylate ester substituents; preferably in a weight ratio from 100:1 to 1:20, respectively; preferably 10:1 to 1:15.


Preferably, the polymer resin comprises from 70 to 95 wt % of the compound(s) of formula (I); preferably at least 73 wt %, preferably at least 76 wt %, preferably at least 79 wt %; preferably no more than 93 wt %, preferably no more than 91 wt %, preferably no more than 89 wt %.


Preferably, the polymer resin of this invention comprises from 0.01 to 5 wt % of quantum dots, preferably at least 0.03 wt %, preferably at least 0.05 wt %; preferably no more than 4 wt %, preferably no more than 3 wt %, preferably no more than 2 wt %. Preferably, quantum dots comprise CdS, CdSe, CdTe, ZnS, ZnSe, ZnTe, HgS, HgSe, HgTe, GaN, GaP, GaAs, InP, InAs or a combination thereof.


Preferably, ligands surrounding the inorganic part of quantum dots have non-polar components. Preferred ligands include, for example, trioctyl phosphine oxide, dodecanethiol and fatty acid salts (e.g., stearate salts, oleic acid salts).


Preferably, the block or graft copolymer is a hydrocarbon polymer. The block or graft polymer is added to the polymer resin as a rheology modifier, i.e., a thickener. Preferably, the block or graft polymer comprises at least 15 wt % styrene, preferably at least 20 wt %, preferably at least 25 wt %; preferably no more than 90 wt %, preferably no more than 80 wt %, preferably no more than 70 wt %, preferably no more than 60 wt %, preferably no more than 50 wt %, preferably no more than 45 wt %. Preferably, the block or graft polymer comprises at least 10 wt % of a non-styrene block, preferably at least 20 wt %, preferably at least 30 wt %, preferably at least 40 wt %, preferably at least 50 wt %, preferably at least 55 wt %; preferably no more than 85 wt %, preferably no more than 80 wt %, preferably no more than 75 wt %, preferably no more than 60 wt %, preferably no more than 50 wt %, preferably no more than 45 wt %. Preferably, the non-styrene monomers in the copolymer (non-styrene block) are alkenes, dienes, (meth)acrylates, siloxanes, or combinations thereof; preferably alkenes and/or dienes. Preferably, the non-styrene in the copolymer comprises polymerized units of C2-C8 alkenes and/or dienes, preferably C2-C5 alkenes and/or dienes. Preferably, the block or graft polymer is a block copolymer. Preferably, the C2-C8 alkenes and/or dienes are selected from ethylene, propylene, butylene, isoprene and butadiene. Preferably, Mn of the block or graft polymer is at least 60,000, preferably at least 70,000, preferably at least 80,000; preferably no more than 350,000, preferably no more than 300,000, preferably no more than 250,000.


Preferably, the non-styrene block has a van Krevelen solubility parameter less than 17.2 (J/cm3)1/2, preferably less than 17, preferably less than 16.5; preferably at least 15.5.


Preferably, a homopolymer or random copolymer with Mn greater than polymer critical molecular weight, Mc has a van Krevelen solubility parameter no greater than 19.5 (J/cm3)1/2; preferably at least 17, preferably at least 17.5, preferably at least 18.0. Preferably, Mn is at least 1.5 times Mc, preferably at least twice; preferably no more than 20 times Mc, preferably no more than ten times. Preferred polymers having Mn greater than Mc include, e.g., those comprising polymerized units of styrene, alkenes, dienes, (meth)acrylates, siloxanes, or combinations thereof. Mc for polystyrene is 30,000 kDa.


Other additives which may be incorporated into the polymer composite of this invention include UV stabilizers, antioxidants and scattering agents to improve light extraction.


Preferred forms for the polymer composite include, e.g., films, beads, strips, rods, cubes and plates. The polymer composite is useful in many applications, including, e.g., displays, lighting and medical applications. Preferred display applications include public information displays, signage, televisions, monitors, mobile phones, tablets, laptops, automotive dashboards and watches.


EXAMPLES
Sample Preparation for Examples

A) Liquid Sample Preparation


All QD resin samples were prepared under inert environment. Styrene-based polymers were dissolved in isobornyl acrylate by mixing at 80° C. for ˜30 min using magnetic stirring. After all components except quantum dots were loaded to a crimp vial, the vial is degassed and mixed for 3 to 5 minutes using a dual axis planetary mixer (Thinky ARE-310). Quantum dots were pre-dispersed in isobornyl acrylate, then mixed with the other components followed by rolling for 1 hr.


B) Film Sample Preparation


All samples were prepared by lamination of the resin formulations between two i-Component PET barrier films. Approximately 2 mL of resin was dispensed on the bottom film and the top has applied with a gap coating bar with gap setup based on desired film thickness. Samples were cured in a Fusion UV F300S curing system with UVA ˜400 mJ/cm2. The films were then cut into approximately 0.2″ square pieces for Quantum Yield Measurements and 1×1″ square pieces for photo oxidation tests. Freestanding films were also prepared by coating of the resin formulations on glass, followed by curing in a FUSION UV SYSTEMS, INC (DRS-10/12 QNH) with UVA ˜400 mJ/cm2. The free-standing films were then delaminated from glass and used for O2 permeability testing using Mocon ox-tran model 2/21 with 3% O2 and 97% N2 at 23° C.


C) Characterization


Viscosity was measured by Brookfield DV-II+ viscometer. Frequency sweep and steady state flow experiments of resins were performed using a AR G2 rheometer at 20° C. Both liquid and film photoluminescent Quantum Yield (PLQY), peak emission wavelength (PWL) and full-width half-max of the emission peak (FWHM) were measured with a Hamamatsu C9920-02G integrating sphere. Film thicknesses were determined by measurement of the cured films with a micrometer and then subtracting out the barrier film thickness. Edge ingress was determined by image analysis of 1″×1″ samples aged on a bare backlight unit. Number average molecular weight (Mn) and polydispersity (PDI) of polymers were determined using a size exclusion chromatography equipped with a mixed A PLgel 20 um×300 mm×7.5 mm (×2+ guard) column with stabilized tetrahydrofuran at 1.0 mL/min @35° C. and a refractive index detector (against polystyrene standards).


D) Chemical Composition Description:




























Van Krevelen






η in 25 wt %



Solubility


Polymer



solution at
Melt index


Parameter of Non-


rhoelogy
CAS

Styrene
25° C.
at 230° C., 5 kg,
Mn

Styrene Block,


modifier
number
Chemistry
content
(Pa · s)*
g/10 min*
(kDa)
PDI
(J/cm3)1/2























Polystyrene
9003-53-6
Styrene
100%


139
2.85





homo


KRATON
66070-
SEBS
56-60%

<1
244
1.41
15.9


A1535
58-4
triblock


KRATON
68648-89-5
SEP
35-39%
>50
1
149
1.18
16.4


G1701

diblock


KRATON
66070-
SEBS
28-30%
1.8
6
85
1.19
15.9


G1652
58-4
triblock


KRATON
66070-
SEBS
28.8-31.6 w%
1100-1900
<1
101

15.9


G1650M
58-4
triblock

(20 w%)


KRATON
68648-
SEP
26-29%
50
<1
208
1.21
16.4


G1702
89-5
diblock


KRATON
66070-
SEBS
19-23%
1.1-1.6
<1 (2.16 kg)
138
1.16
15.9


G1642
58-4
triblock


KRATON
66070-
SEBS
12-14%

2-4.5 (2.16 kg)
186
1.32
15.9


G1645
58-4
triblock


KRATON
127883-
(EP)n star
 0%
8.7
8 (200° C.)
489
1.26


G1750
08-3





*Data from KRATON


SEBS: styrene-ethylene/butylene-styrene;


SEP: styrene-ethylene/propylene;


EP: ethylene/propylene


















Chemical




name
Description
CAS #

















AEROSIL
A hydrophobic fumed silica after treated with
68583-49-3


R104
(Octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane)



AEROSIL
A hydrophobic fumed silica after treated with
68583-49-3


R106
(Octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane)



AEROSIL
A hydrophobic fumed silica after treated with
68611-44-9


R974
Dimethyldichlorosilane



AEROSIL
A hydrophobic fumed silica after treated with
68909-20-6


R812S
hexamethyldisilazane



CABOSIL
A medium surface area fumed silica which has
67762-90-7


TS720
been surface modified with polydimethylsiloxane



CABOSIL
A treated, high-purity silica that has been treated
68909-20-6


TS530
with hexamethyldisilazane.









Example 1
1001 Formulation

Comparison of Fumed Silica to KRATON Block Copolymer (Styrene-Ethylene/Butylene-Styrene Triblock Copolymer (SEBS))


The KRATON block copolymer showed higher viscosity enhancement of the acrylic monomer than the inorganic fume silica Both the KRATON block copolymer and some of the inorganic fumes silica showed compatibility with QD.














Formulation
Isobornyl acrylate +
Viscosity



Additive (6 wt %)
(cP at 25° C.)

















A1
none
8


B1
AEROSIL R104
37.3


C1
AEROSIL R106
60.6


D1
AEROSIL R974
96


E1
AEROSIL R812S
69


F1
CABOSIL TS720
64.8


G1
CABOSIL TS530
31.5


H1
KRATON G1652
145






















Isobornyl acrylate +




Additive (2 wt %) +




Nanoco CFQD ™
Quantum



quantum dot
yield


Formulation
(0.175 wt %)
(%)







A2
none
68.1


B2
AEROSIL R104
68.8


C2
AEROSIL R106
65.7


D2
AEROSIL R974
68.3


E2
AEROSIL R812S
67.7


F2
CABOSIL TS720
70.4


G2
CABOSIL TS530
68.9


H2
KRATON G1652
69.4









Example 2
1031 Formulation

Comparison of KRATON to Lower MW Acrylate Oligomers


KRATON G1652 showed higher compatibility with QDs (higher QY, lower peak wavelength, and FWHM) than the lower MW acrylate oligomers tested.















formulation













Component
A
B
C
D
E
F
















Nanoco CFQD ™
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3


quantum dot


Isobornyl acrylate
55.2
55.2
55.2
59.2
59.2
77.2


Tricyclodecane dimethanol
10
10
10
10
10
10


diacrylate


IRGACURE I-819
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5


KRATON G1652 copolymer
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
7.5


CN9010 urethane acrylate
20
20
20
20
20


oligomer


BR-641D urethane acrylate
5



1


oligomer


CN-9014 urethane acrylate

5


oligomer


CN-309 acrylate oligomer


5


CD9055 acrylate additive



1


ZOCO 101 powder
2
2
2
2
2
2


TINUVIN 123
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
























Film
Film
Peak




thickness
QY
wavelength
Full width half



(um)
(%)
(nm)
maximum (nm)







Formulation A
31.33
46.5
645.6
63.6


Formulation B
33.67
47.9
644.1
63.9


Formulation C
34.00
50.6
637.7
62.1


Formulation D
27.00
43.6
637.4
59.3


Formulation E
30.00
46.7
640.6
63.7


Formulation F
26.67
50.9
636.4
55.7









Example 3
1104 Formulation

Comparison of Two KRATON Block Copolymers with Different MW


The KRATON SEBS block copolymer, G1650, with a similar styrene composition but a higher MW (also indicated by solution viscosity in toluene and melt index) showed a higher viscosity enhancement of the acrylate-based QD resins



















Solution
Melt Index,





viscosity in
230° C.,



Styrene
Mn
toluene
5 kg


Thickener
content
(kDa)
@25° C. (cP)
(gms/10 min)



















KRATON
29.0-30.8 w %
85
 400-525 (20 w %)
5


G1652M






KRATON
28.8-31.6 w %
101
1100-1900 (20 w %)
<1


G1650M


























formulation
















Component
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I



















Isobornyl acrylate
62
63
65
67
69
62
63
66
69


Tricyclodecane
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24


dimethanol diacrylate


Irgacure I-819
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5


KRATON G1650
9
8
6
4
2


copolymer


KRATON G1652





9
8
5
2


copolymer


Zoco 101 powder
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2


Tinuvin 123
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
























Viscosity (cP at 25° C.)



















Formulation A
4820



Formulation B
1173



Formulation C
236.7



Formulation D
101



Formulation E
38.5



Formulation F
500



Formulation G
350



Formulation H
146



Formulation I
39.4










Example 4
0421 Formulation

Comparison of Different KRATON Polymers and a Styrene Homopolymer Mixed with a Single Monomer


KRATON block copolymers are generally compatible with QDs in IBOA as shown by PLQY, PLmax, and FWHM.


















Isobornyl acrylate







(94.825 wt %) +



Full



Additive (5 wt %) +
Styrene


width



Nanoco CFQD ™
content

Peak
half



quantum dot
of
PLQY
wavelength
maximum



(0.175 wt %)
additive
(%)
(nm)
(nm)




















A1
None
N/A
75.3
639.89
57.41


B1
Polystyrene
100%
76.3
639.89
57.78


C1
KRATON A1535
56-60%
75.8
639.89
57.53


D1
KRATON G1701
35-39%
75
640.64
57.59


E1
KRATON G1652
28-30%
77.5
638.41
57.99


F1
KRATON G1702
26-29%
73.4
639.89
57.81


G1
KRATON G1642
19-23%
73.8
639.15
58.51


H1
KRATON G1645
12-14%
74.9
639.89
57.79


I1
KRATON G1750
 0%
76.1
642.12
57.26










Comparison of Different KRATON Polymers and a Styrene Homopolymer Mixed with a Mixture of a Monomer and a Crosslinker and a Single Crosslinker


KRATON block copolymers with a styrene composition higher than 12% are soluble in the IBOA:SR-833 (1:1) mixture, and those with a styrene composition higher than 26% are soluble in SR-833.

















Additive (5


Viscosity (cP at 20° C.)













wt %) +


Isobornyl




Nanoco


acrylate




CFQD ™


(47.41%) +
Tricyclode-



quantum

Styrene
tricyclodecane
cane



dot

content
dimethanol
dimethanol



(0.175

of
diacrylate
diacrylate



wt %)
Chemistry
additive
(47.41%)
(94.82%)















A2
None
N/A
N/A
23
146


B2
Polystyrene
Styrene homo
100%
441
2940


C2
KRATON
SEBS triblock
56-60%
658
Gel (high



A1535



viscosity)


D2
KRATON
SEP diblock
35-39%
96
411



G1701






E2
KRATON
SEBS triblock
28-30%
62
397



G1652






F2
KRATON
SEP diblock
26-29%
76.5
415



G1702






G2
KRATON
SEBS triblock
19-23%
63
Insoluble



G1642






H2
KRATON
SEBS triblock
12-14%
68
Insoluble



G1645






I2
KRATON
(EP)n star
 0%
Insoluble
Insoluble



G1750









Example 5
0528 Formulation

Comparison of Two Different KRATON Block Copolymers in Full Resin/Film Formulation


Replacement of KRATON G1652 with KRATON A1535 with a higher MW and higher styrene content resulted in a lower loading of rheology modifier to obtain comparable resin viscosity, comparable PLQY, and a lower edge ingress of QD films aged at 60° C. and 90 RH %.





















Melt index at



Rhoelogy
Styrene
Mn
230° C., 5 kg,



modifier
content
(kDa)
g/10 min





















KRATON A1535
56-60%
244
<1



KRATON G1652
28-30%
85
6























Formulation A
Formulation B

















Nanoco CFQD ™ quantum dot
0.2
0.2


Isobornyl acrylate
51.3
43.8


Tricyclodecane dimethanol diacrylate
40
40


Irgacure I-819
1.5
1.5


KRATON A1535 copolymer
3.5
0


KRATON G1652 copolymer
0
11


Finex 30S-LP2 zinc oxide powder
2
2


Tinuvin 123
1.5
1.5






















Viscosity at 25° C.




(cP)
PLQY







Formulation A
877
53.2


Formulation B
918
53.6









Edge ingress after 60° C., 90% humidity chamber accelerated testing

















72 hrs
168 hrs
336 hrs
504 hrs







Formulation A
0.62
1.27
1.98
2.84


Formulation B
0.93
1.80
2.77
3.89









Example 6

Comparison of Two Different KRATON Block Copolymers in Films (Barrier Property)


Replacement of KRATON G1652 with KRATON A1535 with a higher MW and higher styrene content resulted in a better O2 bather of films which is consistent with the lower edge ingress of QD films at accelerated testing.

















Materials
Formulation A
Formulation B




















Isobornyl acrylate
53.0
57.0



Tricyclodecane dimethanol
30.0
32.3



diacrylate





KRATON A1535
3.2
0



KRATON G1652
0
9.5



Finex 30S LP2
6.0
6.0



I-819
1.5
1.5

























O2 permeability at 50%




RH, 76 cmHg,




23° C. (3% O2 &




97% N2), cc/m/day/atm)



















Formulation A2
0.047



Formulation B2
0.11










Example 7

Comparison of Two Different KRATON Block Copolymers in Resins (Rheological Property)














Materials
Formulation A
Formulation B

















Isobornyl acrylate
51.4
47.6


Tricyclodecane dimethanol diacrylate
45.6
42.4


KRATON A1535
3
0


KRATON G1652
0
10









The mixture of isobornyl acrylate and tricyclodecane dimethanol diacrylate with 3% KRATON A1535 exhibits rheological simplicity at 20° C. (i.e., it obeys the “Cox-Merz rule” that the complex viscosity as a function of frequency and the shear viscosity as a function of shear rate overlap) indicating a simple polymeric fluid (The structure and rheology of complex fluids, Oxford, N.Y., 1999, Chapter 1), while that with 10% KRATON G1652 does not. A simple polymeric fluid with rheological simplicity is preferred for viscosity control of resins.












3% KRATON A1535









Frequency sweep
Strain rate sweep-1
Strain rate sweep-2













Complex






Frequency
viscosity
Rate
Viscosity
Rate
Viscosity


(rad/s)
(Pa · s)
(1/s)
(Pa · s)
(1/s)
(Pa · s)















63.09
0.2147
0.1892
0.2108
0.1893
0.2242


39.81
0.2102
0.2383
0.2164
0.2383
0.2219


25.12
0.2081
0.3
0.2165
0.3
0.2177


15.85
0.2069
0.3776
0.2145
0.3777
0.2116


10
0.2069
0.4754
0.2169
0.4754
0.2102


6.309
0.2069
0.5986
0.2161
0.5986
0.2069


3.981
0.2073
0.7535
0.2116
0.7536
0.206


2.512
0.2071
0.9487
0.2083
0.9486
0.2058


1.585
0.2069
1.194
0.2071
1.194
0.2062


1
0.2069
1.504
0.2067
1.504
0.2059


0.6309
0.2068
1.893
0.2061
1.893
0.2045


0.3981
0.2068
2.383
0.2056
2.383
0.2059


0.2512
0.2068
3
0.2065
3
0.205


0.1585
0.2065
3.777
0.2057
3.777
0.205


0.1
0.2069
4.755
0.2056
4.755
0.2051


0.06309
0.2068
5.986
0.2055
5.986
0.2048


0.03981
0.2068
7.536
0.2054
7.536
0.2048


0.02512
0.2065
9.487
0.2054
9.487
0.2048




11.94
0.2054
11.94
0.2048




15.04
0.2055
15.04
0.2049




18.93
0.2055
18.93
0.2049




23.83
0.2056
23.83
0.2049




30
0.2055
30
0.2049




37.77
0.2055
37.77
0.2049




47.55
0.2055
47.55
0.205




59.86
0.2055
59.86
0.2051




75.36
0.2055
75.36
0.2051




94.87
0.2055
94.87
0.2051




119.4
0.2055
119.4
0.205




150.4
0.2054
150.4
0.2049




189.3
0.2053
189.3
0.2048




238.3
0.2051
238.3
0.2046




300
0.2048
300
0.2044




377.7
0.2046
377.7
0.2042




475.5
0.2043
475.5
0.2038




598.6
0.2037
598.6
0.2033




600
0.2034
600
0.203



















10% KRATON G1652









Frequency sweep
Strain rate sweep-1
Strain rate sweep-2













Complex






Frequency
viscosity
Rate
Viscosity
Rate
Viscosity


(rad/s)
(Pa · s)
(1/s)
(Pa · s)
(1/s)
(Pa · s)















63.09
0.3421
0.1892
0.2713
0.1894
0.306


39.81
0.3443
0.2383
0.2661
0.2383
0.2925


25.12
0.3415
0.3
0.2583
0.3
0.2892


15.85
0.3373
0.3777
0.2534
0.3777
0.274


10
0.3395
0.4755
0.2546
0.4755
0.2574


6.309
0.3389
0.5985
0.2453
0.5986
0.2359


3.981
0.3389
0.7537
0.2317
0.7536
0.2278


2.512
0.3392
0.9488
0.2244
0.9487
0.217


1.585
0.3422
1.194
0.2169
1.194
0.2102


1
0.3421
1.504
0.2085
1.504
0.2057


0.6309
0.3397
1.893
0.2074
1.893
0.2101


0.3981
0.3396
2.383
0.2055
2.383
0.2077


0.2512
0.3388
3
0.2042
3
0.204


0.1585
0.3355
3.777
0.2045
3.777
0.2065


0.1
0.3415
4.755
0.2038
4.755
0.2032


0.06309
0.3478
5.986
0.2038
5.986
0.2039


0.03981
0.3364
7.536
0.2037
7.536
0.2041


0.02512
0.3436
9.487
0.2035
9.487
0.2035




11.94
0.2035
11.94
0.2034




15.04
0.2035
15.04
0.2035




18.93
0.2034
18.93
0.2034




23.83
0.2033
23.83
0.2034




30
0.2031
30
0.2032




37.77
0.2028
37.77
0.2029




47.55
0.2025
47.55
0.2026




59.86
0.2019
59.86
0.202




75.36
0.2011
75.36
0.2012




94.87
0.1999
94.87
0.2




119.4
0.1982
119.4
0.1983




150.4
0.1959
150.4
0.1961




189.3
0.1931
189.3
0.1933




238.3
0.1892
238.3
0.1893




300
0.1844
300
0.1846




377.7
0.1789
377.7
0.1791




475.5
0.1729
475.5
0.173




598.6
0.1663
598.6
0.1664




600
0.1663
600
0.1664








Claims
  • 1. A polymer resin comprising: (a) quantum dots,(b) a compound of formula (I)
  • 2. The polymer resin of claim 1 in which R2 is a C7-C17 bridged polycyclic substituent.
  • 3. The polymer resin of claim 2 in which the block or graft copolymer is a hydrocarbon polymer which comprises at least 20 wt % polymerized units of styrene and at least 20% polymerized units of alkenes, dienes or a combination thereof.
  • 4. The polymer resin of claim 3 comprising from 70 to 95 wt % of the compound of formula (I), from 1 to 20 wt % of the block or graft copolymer, 0.01 to 5 wt % of quantum dots and from 0.3 to 5 wt % curing agents.
  • 5. The polymer resin of claim 4 in which R2 has a bicyclo[2,2,1]alkane or tricyclodecane ring system.
  • 6. The polymer resin of claim 5 in which the block or graft copolymer has Mn from 60,000 to 300,000.
  • 7. The polymer resin of claim 6 in which the block or graft copolymer has at least 20% polymerized units of styrene and no more than 80 wt % polymerized units of monomers selected from the group consisting of C2-C8 alkenes and C2-C8 dienes.
  • 8. The polymer resin of claim 7 in which the C2-C8 alkenes and dienes are selected from the group consisting of ethylene, propylene, butylene, isoprene and butadiene.
  • 9. The polymer resin of claim 8 in which the hydrocarbon polymer has Mn from 70,000 to 250,000.
  • 10. A polymer resin comprising: (a) quantum dots,(b) a compound of formula (I)
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/US2017/032311 5/12/2017 WO 00
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2017/205079 11/30/2017 WO A
US Referenced Citations (1)
Number Name Date Kind
20160272885 Bai Sep 2016 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
2015028139 Feb 2015 JP
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20190085112 A1 Mar 2019 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62342280 May 2016 US