Rig sensor testing and calibration

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11697991
  • Patent Number
    11,697,991
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, January 13, 2021
    3 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 11, 2023
    10 months ago
Abstract
A method includes attaching a sensor calibration tool to a drill string. The sensor calibration tool includes a first tool sensor configured to measure a first operational parameter. A first tool sensor measurement of the first operational parameter is received from the first tool sensor, where the drill string is disposed at least partially within a wellbore and supported by a surface rig system and the sensor calibration tool is positioned on the drill string at a surface location proximate to the surface rig system. A first rig sensor measurement of the first operational parameter is received from a first rig sensor positioned on a first surface component of the surface rig system. The first rig sensor is calibrated based on a comparison of the first tool sensor measurement with the first rig sensor measurement.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

This disclosure relates to wellbore drilling and production.


BACKGROUND

Hydrocarbons trapped in subsurface reservoirs are retrieved by first forming wellbores from the surface of the Earth to the subsurface reservoirs and then producing (that is, raising) the trapped hydrocarbons through the wellbores to the surface. Equipment used to drill the wellbores can include a drill string that is disposed in the wellbore and which includes a drill bit that drills into the Earth, and a surface rig system which supports the drill string and provides other functions. The surface rig system can include multiple surface components such as equipment to hoist and rotate the drill string and to pump drilling fluid into the drill string.


SUMMARY

This disclosure describes a system, tool, and method for monitoring the accuracy of the various rig sensors positioned on the various surface components of a well drilling system.


Certain aspects of the subject matter herein can be implemented as a method including attaching a sensor calibration tool to a drill string. The sensor calibration tool includes a first tool sensor configured to measure a first operational parameter. A first tool sensor measurement of the first operational parameter is received from the first tool sensor, where the drill string is disposed at least partially within a wellbore and supported by a surface rig system and the sensor calibration tool is positioned on the drill string at a surface location proximate to the surface rig system. A first rig sensor measurement of the first operational parameter is received from a first rig sensor positioned on a first surface component of the surface rig system. The first rig sensor is calibrated based on a comparison of the first tool sensor measurement with the first rig sensor measurement.


An aspect combinable with any of the other aspects can include the following features. The first tool sensor measurement and the first rig sensor measurement each include a respective plurality of measurements of the first operational parameter over a period of time.


An aspect combinable with any of the other aspects can include the following features. The sensor calibration tool includes a memory module. The first rig sensor measurement is stored in the memory module.


An aspect combinable with any of the other aspects can include the following features. The receiving of the first tool sensor measurement and the receiving of the first rig sensor measurement are by a data gathering and analysis module comprising a computer system comprising one or more processors and a non-transitory computer readable medium storing instructions executable by the one or more processors to perform operations.


An aspect combinable with any of the other aspects can include the following features. The sensor calibration tool includes a wireless transmitter. The first tool sensor measurement is transmitted from the sensor calibration tool via wireless telemetry to the data gathering and analysis module.


An aspect combinable with any of the other aspects can include the following features. A difference between the first tool sensor measurement and the first rig sensor measurement is calculated by the data gathering and analysis module. The difference is compared to a stored difference threshold by the data gathering and analysis module. An alert is transmitted by the data gathering and analysis module in response to the difference exceeding the stored difference threshold.


An aspect combinable with any of the other aspects can include the following features. Historical measurements from the first rig sensor of the first operational parameter are stored by the data gathering and analysis module. The historical measurements are adjusted by the data gathering and analysis module based in part on the comparison of the first tool sensor measurement with the first rig sensor measurement.


An aspect combinable with any of the other aspects can include the following features. The first operational parameter can include a frequency of rotation of the drill string, a pressure of fluid pumped through a stand pipe line and down the drill string, a flow rate of fluid pumped through the stand pipe line and down the drill string, a temperature of fluid pumped through the stand pipe line and down the drill string, a torque load of the drill string, a frequency of mud pump strokes, a weight of the drill string, vibrations in the drill string, or acoustic signals in proximity of the drill string.


An aspect combinable with any of the other aspects can include the following features. The first surface component of the surface rig system includes a stand pipe line, a top drive, a mud pump, a mud pit, a rotary table, or a draw works for a drill line.


An aspect combinable with any of the other aspects can include the following features. The first rig sensor is included in a plurality of rig sensors, each rig sensor positioned on a respective one of a plurality of surface components of the surface rig system, each rig sensor configured to measure a respective one of a plurality of operational parameters. The first tool sensor is included in a tool sensor bank disposed on the sensor calibration tool, the tool sensor bank comprising a plurality of tool sensors, each tool sensor of the tool sensor bank configured to measure a respective one of the plurality of operational parameters. A respective tool sensor measurement of the respective operational parameter for which the tool sensor is configured to measure receiving is received from each tool sensor in the tool sensor bank. A respective rig sensor measurement of the respective operational parameter for which the surface rig sensor is configured to measure is received from each of a plurality of rig sensors. Each of the plurality of rig sensors is calibrated based on a comparison of the respective tool sensor measurement with the respective tool sensor measurement of the respective operational parameter for which the rig sensor is configured to measure.


Certain aspects of the subject matter herein can be implemented as a drilling sensor calibration system. The drilling sensor calibration system includes a surface rig system configured to support a drill string, a first rig sensor positioned on a first surface component of the surface rig system, the first rig sensor configured to measure a first operational parameter, and a sensor calibration tool configured to be attached to the drill string at a surface location proximate to the surface rig system, the sensor calibration tool comprising a first tool sensor configured to measure the first operational parameter. The drilling sensor calibration system also includes a data gathering and analysis module includes a computer system comprising one or more processors and a non-transitory computer readable medium storing instructions executable by the one or more processors to perform operations. The operations include receiving, from the first tool sensor, the first tool sensor measurement of the first operational parameter, receiving, from the first rig sensor, the first rig sensor measurement of the first operational parameter, and displaying a comparison of the first tool sensor measurement with the first rig sensor measurement.


An aspect combinable with any of the other aspects can include the following features. The operations include calibrating the first rig sensor based on a comparison of the first tool sensor measurement with the first rig sensor measurement


An aspect combinable with any of the other aspects can include the following features. The first tool sensor measurement includes a plurality of measurements over a period of time.


An aspect combinable with any of the other aspects can include the following features. The sensor calibration tool includes a memory module. The first rig sensor measurement is stored in the memory module.


An aspect combinable with any of the other aspects can include the following features. The sensor calibration tool includes a wireless transmitter. The first tool sensor measurement is transmitted via wireless telemetry from the sensor calibration tool to the data gathering and analysis module.


An aspect combinable with any of the other aspects can include the following features. The operations include calculating, by the data gathering and analysis module, a difference between the first tool sensor measurement and the first rig sensor measurement, comparing, by the data gathering and analysis module, the difference to a stored difference threshold, and transmitting, by the data gathering and analysis module, an alert in response to the difference exceeding the stored difference threshold.


An aspect combinable with any of the other aspects can include the following features. The operations include storing, by the data gathering and analysis module, historical measurements from the first rig sensor of the first operational parameter, and adjusting, by the data gathering and analysis module, the historical measurements based in part on the comparison of the first tool sensor measurement with the first rig sensor measurement.


An aspect combinable with any of the other aspects can include the following features. The first operational parameter includes a frequency of rotation of the drill string, a pressure of fluid pumped through a stand pipe line and down the drill string, a flow rate of fluid pumped through the stand pipe line and down the drill string, a temperature of fluid pumped through the stand pipe line and down the drill string, a torque load of the drill string, a frequency of mud pump strokes, a weight of the drill string, vibrations in the drill string, or acoustic signals in proximity of the drill string.


An aspect combinable with any of the other aspects can include the following features. The first surface component of the surface rig system includes a stand pipe line, a top drive, a mud pump, a mud pit, a rotary table, or a draw works for a drill line.


An aspect combinable with any of the other aspects can include the following features. The first rig sensor is included in a plurality of rig sensors, each rig sensor positioned on a respective one of a plurality of surface components of the surface rig system. Each rig sensor is configured to measure a respective one of a plurality of operational parameters, and wherein the first tool sensor is included in a tool sensor bank disposed on the sensor calibration tool, the tool sensor bank comprising a plurality of tool sensors, each tool sensor of the tool sensor bank configured to measure a respective one of the plurality of operational parameters. The operations include receiving, from each tool sensor in the tool sensor bank, a respective sensor measurement of the respective operational parameter for which the tool sensor is configured to measure, receiving, from each of a plurality of rig sensors, a respective sensor measurement of the respective operational parameter for which the rig sensor is configured to measure, and displaying a comparison of the respective tool sensor measurement with the respective tool sensor measurement of the respective operational parameter for which the rig sensor is configured to measure.


The details of one or more implementations of the subject matter of this disclosure are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description. Other features, aspects, and advantages of the subject matter will become apparent from the description, the drawings, and the claims.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a drawing of an example well system in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure.



FIG. 2 is a drawing of a sensor calibration tool in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure.



FIG. 3 is a drawing of a sensor bank on a sensor calibration tool in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure.



FIGS. 4A and 4B are drawings of a sensor calibration tool in accordance with an alternative embodiment of the present disclosure.



FIG. 5 is a process flow diagram of a method for determining an accuracy of a rig sensor in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

During drilling operations, it can be useful for an operator to have information regarding various operational parameters of the well drilling system such as drill string weight, revolutions-per-minute (RPM) of the drill string, drilling fluid pressure, drilling fluid flow, drilling fluid temperature, drill string vibrations, noise, and/or tension, compression, drag, and/or strain of the drill string. Such information can be used by the operator to monitor drilling operations so as to optimize rate of penetration and otherwise maximize the safe, efficient, and cost-effective operation of the well system.


Sensors that measure such operational parameters are typically positioned on various surface components of the rig system. The kind, location, and accuracy of rig sensors can vary greatly with different well systems in different locations and different kinds and types of equipment and sensors. In addition, it is common for rig sensors to go out of calibration or otherwise develop inaccuracies that are reflected in the operational parameter information received by the operator. Different skill levels of crew members can also contribute to differences in operational parameter information received by the operator from the rig sensors.


This disclosure describes a system, tool, and method for monitoring the accuracy of the various rig sensors positioned on the various surface components of a well drilling system. In accordance with an embodiment of the disclosure, an instrumented sub comprising a sensor calibration tool housing one or multiple tool sensors can be attached to the drill string. Each of the tool sensors on the sensor calibration tool can measure an operational parameter that is also measured by a corresponding rig sensor that is positioned on a surface component. Sensor data from the rig sensors and the tool sensors can be captured by a data gathering and analysis module and displayed for the operator on a display screen. The system can be configured to alert the operator if differences between the rig sensor measurement and the tool sensor measurement exceed a threshold value. Based on the sensor data and comparison information provided by the system, rig sensors can be calibrated and/or otherwise adjusted and managed to enhance sensor data accuracy.


Properly calibrated and accurate rig sensors can contribute to a higher rate-of-penetration and avoid drill string failure and/or other conditions or events that can result in lost time and increased costs. The sensor calibration tool can be easily attached or detached from the drill string and carried to a different wellsite, such that the system with the same tool sensor suite can be utilized at multiple drilling locations, thus minimizing time and costs and allowing for consistent sensor calibration procedures and results.


In accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure, the sensor calibration tool and system can be brought to a wellsite in response to an incident such as stuck pipe or twist off and installed on the well system to determine whether and the extent to which any rig sensors are out-of-calibration or otherwise inaccurate. Historical data related to the incident can be analyzed and corrected if necessary utilizing data from the sensor calibration tool. Data from the sensor calibration tool can be utilized in preventative tools such as machine learning algorithms for automated operations or rig crew training.



FIG. 1 illustrates a well system 100 in accordance with one embodiment of the present disclosure. In the illustrated embodiment, Well system 100 includes a conventional rotary land rig. However, the present disclosure is applicable to other types of onshore or offshore drilling rigs (including top drive, power swivel, down hole motor, and coiled tubing units) and to other drilling and/or production rigs or platforms that are operable to bore through the earth and/or produce hydrocarbons or other resources from the earth.


Well system 100 includes a surface rig system 102 and a drill string 150. Surface rig system 102 includes several surface components at or near the surface, including a derrick 104 that is supported above a rig floor 106. In other embodiments, a mast may be used in lieu of a derrick 104. Surface rig system 102 further includes a lifting gear that includes a crown block 108 mounted to the derrick 104, a travelling block 110, a hook 116, and a swivel 118. The crown block 108 and the travelling block 110 are interconnected by a cable 112 that is driven by draw works 114 to control the upward and downward movement of the travelling block 110. Travelling block 110 carries hook 116 from which is suspended swivel 118. The swivel 118 supports a top drive 138, which is also a surface component of surface rig system 102. Other surface components of surface rig system 102 include slips 122, mud pumps 124, stand pipe line 132, and mud tanks 128, described in more detail below. In other embodiments, surface rig system 102 can include other, more, and/or fewer surface components.


Drill string 150 includes drill pipe 154 (which comprises a plurality of interconnected drill pipe sections), and further includes a saver sub 152 at the top (uphole) end of drill string 150 and a bottom-hole assembly (BHA) 156 at the downhole end of drill string 150. BHA 156 includes a drill bit 158 and a mud motor 160, and may also include stabilizers, drill collars, measurement well drilling (MWD) instruments, and the like.


Drill string 150 is positioned at least partially in well bore 101. The top of drill string 150, specifically, saver sub 152, is attached to top drive 138. In this way, surface rig system 102 supports drill string 150. The weight of drill string 150 may be further supported by slips 122.


Surface rig system 102 also pumps drilling fluid, or mud, 126, down drill string 150. More specifically, mud pumps 124 draw drilling fluid 126 from mud tanks 128 through stand pipe line 132. The drilling fluid 126 is delivered to the drill string 150 through stand pipe line 132 which connects to swivel 118. From the swivel 118, the drilling fluid 126 travels through the drill string 150 to the BHA 156, where it turns the mud motor 160 and exits the bit 158 to scour the formation and lift the resultant cuttings through the annulus to the surface. At the surface, mud tanks 128 receive the drilling fluid 126 from the well bore 101 through a flow line 134. The mud tanks 128 and/or flow line 134 can include a shaker or other device to remove the cuttings.


Drilling is accomplished by rotating the drill string 150, which in turn rotates the bit 158, and applying weight on bit 158. Surface rig system 102, and specifically, top drive 138, provides the rotation to drill string 150 within bore hole 101. Alternatively or in addition, a down hole motor may rotate the bit 158 independently of the drill string 150 and the top drive 138. As previously described, the cuttings produced as bit 158 drills into the earth are carried out of bore hole 101 by the drilling fluid 126 supplied by pumps 124.


In some embodiments, a drilling rig may include a rotary table at the rig floor instead of a top drive. In such embodiments, the rotary table is part of the surface rig system and provides the rotation to drill string 150 during drilling operations.


Information regarding operational parameters of well system 100 such as drill string weight, revolutions-per-minute (RPM) of the drill string, drilling fluid pressure, drilling fluid flow, drilling fluid temperature, drill string vibrations, noise, and/or tension, compression, drag, and/or strain of the drill string can come from rig sensors positioned on (that is, attached to or positioned on the surface of or within) some of the surface components of surface rig system 102, such as draw works 114, stand pipe line 132, mud pumps 124, and/or top drive 138.


For example, in some embodiments, a hook load rig sensor 170 can attached to draw works 114 to measure the weight supported by draw works 114. Hook load rig sensor 170 can be attached at or near the “dead end” of cable 112 or another suitable location.


In some embodiments, additional rig sensors that measure other operational parameters are positioned on other surface components of surface rig system 102. For example, fluid pressure rig sensor 172 can be disposed on or within stand pipe line 132 to measure a pressure of drilling fluid 126 fluid pumped through a stand pipe line 132 and down drill string 150. A flow rig sensor 174 can be disposed one or within mud pumps 124 to measure the rate of flow of drilling fluid 126 pumped by mud pumps 124 through stand pipe line 132 and down drill string 150. In some embodiments, flow rig sensor 174 can detect the number of strokes per minute of mud pumps 124 instead of or in addition to the flow rate. A temperature rig sensor 176 can be disposed on or within mud pumps 124 to measure a temperature of drilling fluid 126.


In some embodiments, one or more sensors can be attached to top drive 138. For example, a torque rig sensor 178 can be attached to top drive 138 to measure a torque load of the drill string. A revolutions-per-minute (RPM) rig sensor 180 can be attached to top drive 138 to measure a frequency of rotation of the drill string. A vibration rig sensor 182 can be attached to top drive 138 to measure vibration at or near the top of drill string 150. An acoustic rig sensor 184 can be attached to top drive 138 to measure noise or other acoustic signals at or near the top of drill string 150.


In drilling systems where a rotary table is used instead of a top drive, the torque, RPM, vibration, and acoustic rig sensors can be attached to or near the rotary table instead of top drive 138. Vibration and/or acoustic rig sensors can also be attached to other surface components of surface rig system 102.


In some embodiments, all of the above-described rig sensors are attached to the surface components of surface rig system 102 as described above. In other embodiments, only one or some of the above-described rig sensors are attached to the surface rig system 102 components. In some embodiments, additional or other rig sensors can be included to measure the above-described or other operational parameters, and/or rig sensors can be placed within, on, or near different or additional surface components of surface rig system 102 than the ones described above.


In an embodiment of the present disclosure, a sensor calibration tool 162 can be attached to drill string 150. As described in more detail in reference to FIGS. 2 and 3, sensor calibration tool 162 can house a tool sensor bank which can include one or more tool sensors which can measure operational parameters such as drill string weight, torque, revolutions-per-minute (RPM) of the drill string, drilling fluid pressure, drilling fluid flow, drilling fluid temperature, drill string vibrations, noise, tension, compression, drag, and/or pipe bending. Sensor calibration tool 162 can be attached to drill string 150 before insertion of drill string 150 into wellbore 101 or after at least a portion of drill string 150 is disposed at least partially within wellbore 101. As described in further detail below, data from the tool sensors on sensor calibration tool 162 can be compared to data from the rig sensors on the surface components of surface rig system 102, the accuracy of the rig sensors can be analyzed and sensors calibrated or otherwise adjusted as necessary so as to optimize drilling operations.


As described in more detail in FIGS. 2-4, sensor calibration tool 162 can include, in addition to a sensor bank including one or multiple tool sensors, a communication module to transmit the tool sensor data. The communication module which can include a wireless transmitter (such as wi-fi, Bluetooth, laser, or acoustic) or other suitable data transmission means. In some embodiments, sensor calibration tool 162 can also include a memory module to store historical or current sensor data from the tool sensors. Sensor calibration tool 162 can also include a power module to provide power to the tool sensors and/or the communication module and/or memory module.


Well system 100 also includes a data gathering and analysis module 190 to receive and/or analyze sensor data from the rig sensor or sensors and the tool sensor or sensors, as described in further detail below. Data gathering and analysis module 190 can include a wireless reader or other receiver to download information from sensor calibration tool 162 such as sensor data from tool sensors of sensor calibration tool 162. Data gathering and analysis module 190 can also be configured to receive data from one, some, or all of the rig sensors of surface rig system 102, via wired or wireless connection.


In some embodiments, data gathering and analysis module 190 includes a computer system that comprises one or more processors, and a computer-readable medium (for example, a non-transitory computer-readable medium) storing computer instructions executable by the one or more processors to perform operations. In some embodiments, data gathering and analysis module 190 is configured to receive display sensor data received from the rig sensors and/or the tool sensors and transmit the information to data display screen 192, which can provide the information to an operation using a graphical user interface (GUI) or other suitable user interface. Sensor data from a rig sensor of a surface component of surface rig system 102 can be displayed next to sensor data from a tool sensor on sensor calibration tool 162 for the same operational parameter. An operator observing a difference in the sensor data between the rig sensor and the corresponding tool sensor can take a suitable action such as calibrating or otherwise adjusting the rig sensor and/or replacing a failed rig sensor.


For example, sensor calibration tool 162 can include a weight sensor which provides information regarding the weight of drill string 150. Measurements from the weight tool sensor can be displayed next to data from hook load rig sensor 170 on draw works 114. Sensor calibration tool 162 can also include a tool sensor that is an RPM sensor to measure the RPM of drill string 150, and measurements from this RPM tool sensor can be displayed next to data from RPM rig sensor 180 on top drive 138. Values from other tool sensors on sensor calibration tool 162 can likewise be displayed next to corresponding values for the same operational parameter from rig sensors on surface rig system 102.


In some embodiments, while attached to drill string 150, sensor calibration tool 162 is positioned at a surface location proximate to surface rig system 102 and the tool sensor measurements and rig sensor measurements can be transmitted and received while the tool is positioned at this surface location. In some embodiments, sensor calibration tool 162 is positioned above rig floor 106. In some embodiments, sensor calibration tool 162 can be positioned at a near-surface location some distance downhole, for example, within about 300 feet of the surface. For example, in the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 1, sensor calibration tool 162 is positioned on the drill string just above rig floor 106 and is proximate to surface components of surface rig system 102 such as top drive 138, draw works 114, and mud pumps 124. Such a surface position allows for data from sensor calibration tool to be most easily, quickly, and accurately transmitted to data gathering and analysis module 190 and/or otherwise accessed via wireless transmission or other means. Also, so positioned at a surface location, data from the tool sensors on sensor calibration tool 162 can in some embodiments be more accurately and directly compared to the data from the nearby rig sensors of surface rig system 102, for a given operational parameter. In some embodiments, locating sensor calibration tool 162 at a surface location can result in more accurate torque measurements, as no frictional losses from rubbing of the tool against the wellbore would be required to be taken into account. In some embodiments, sensor calibration tool 162 can be positioned at a surface location and drill pipes 154 added to drill string 150 below sensor calibration tool 162, and so positioned can provide measurements of the weight of individual drill pipes 154 as they are added to the drill string.


As drilling continues and drill string 150 travels further downhole, sensor calibration tool 162 can be removed from drill string 150 before sensor calibration tool 162 descends into (or further into) wellbore 101. In some embodiments, sensor calibration tool 162 can then be reattached at a higher point on drill string 150 to maintain the position of sensor calibration tool 162 at a surface location as drilling operations continue. In some embodiments, sensor calibration tool 162 is attached to saver sub 152 and drill pipes 154 added beneath sensor calibration tool 162, such that sensor calibration tool 162 remains at a surface location as drill pipes 154 and other portions of drill string 150 are lowered into wellbore 101. In some embodiments, sensor calibration tool 162 is lowered into wellbore 101 along with other components of drill string 150 as drill string 150 travels further downhole.


As described in further detail with regards to FIGS. 2 and 4, sensor calibration tool 162 can be configured as a threaded sub or a clamp that can be readily and easily attached and/or detached from drill string 150. In this way, sensor calibration tool 162 can continue to be positioned at a surface location. Also, because it is easily attachable and detachable, sensor calibration tool 162 can be easily deployed at different well sites, thus minimizing time and costs and allowing for consistent sensor results and consistent calibration procedures and results for different well systems. Likewise, in some embodiments, data gathering and analysis module 190 and display screen 192 can be portable units. In some embodiments, some of the gathering and analysis functions of data gathering and analysis module 190 can be performed in a cloud or edge network.


In some embodiments, data gathering and analysis module 190 can adjust the measurements from the rig sensors and/or the tool sensors so as to make the measurements more directly comparable. For example, in some embodiments, a measurement from hook load rig sensor 170 on draw works 114 can be adjusted by removing (manually or automatically) the known weight of travelling block 110, hook 116, swivel 118, and top drive 138 such that what is left represents the weight of drill string 150 and can be more directly compared to the measurement of the weight of drill string 150 from the weight sensor on sensor calibration tool 162. In some embodiments, no adjustment is necessary because any adjustment would be within the margin of error of the sensor.


In some embodiments, sensor data can be streamed and displayed in real time, and can include single measurements and/or multiple measurements over time. In some embodiments, historical sensor data can be downloaded from sensor calibration tool 162 to data gathering and analysis module 190 and retrieved by the operator from data gathering and analysis module 190 as needed by inputting retrieval commands.


In some embodiments, data gathering and analysis module 190 can be configured to analyze the sensor data and provide alerts the operator when a calibration is required and/or perform other actions. For example, data gathering and analysis module 190 can be configured to calculate the difference between a measurement from a tool sensor on sensor calibration tool 162 of an operational parameter and the corresponding rig sensor measurement (from a rig sensor on a surface component of surface rig system 102) of that operational parameter. Some difference may be an acceptable operational variation, but a greater difference may be an unacceptable variation indicating an out-of-calibration sensor or other condition requiring action by the operator. In some embodiments, data gathering and analysis module 190 can store a threshold value of the difference, above which above which calibration or another action is required. A difference below the threshold value would not trigger an alert; a difference above the threshold value would trigger an alert.


In some embodiments, once the alert is received, the operator can calibrate the rig sensor as necessary in light of the data from the sensor calibration tool 162. Such calibration can be done manually or automatically.


In some embodiments, data gathering and analysis module 190 can be configured to measure and record the standard deviation between tool sensor data and rig sensor data. In some embodiments, data gathering and analysis module 190 can be configured to store historical data including values from the rig sensors and the tool sensors and/or standard deviation data. In some embodiments, data gathering and analysis module 190 can be configured to compare historical data from rig sensors with historical data from tool sensors of their respective operational parameters. In some embodiments, data gathering and analysis module 190 can adjust or correct historical rig sensor data based on this comparison with historical or current tool sensor data and provide the operator with an output comprising such adjusted or corrected historical sensor rig data.


In some embodiments, sensor data from sensor calibration tool 162 can be used to train machine learning algorithms and/or otherwise used to understand and optimize drill string behavior and/or drilling optimization.


In some embodiments, the sensor calibration tool and system can be brought to a wellsite in response to an incident such as stuck pipe or twist off and installed on the well system to determine whether and the extent to which any rig sensors are out-of-calibration or otherwise inaccurate. Where similar incidents have occurred at multiple wells, the system and method can be brought to each of those wells such that historical data related to the incidents at the different wells can be analyzed, corrected, and compared using a common tool and system. By correcting historical data and comparing corrections from different rig systems (which may have significant discrepancies in rig sensor accuracy) with the same calibration tool, a better understanding of the incident(s) can be achieved and future incidents avoided. Data from the system and method can be utilized in preventative tools such as machine learning algorithms for automated operations or rig crew training.



FIG. 2 is a drawing of sensor calibration tool 162 in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure. In the embodiment shown in FIG. 2, sensor calibration tool 162 is an instrumented sub including a mandrel 202, an upper connection 204, and a lower connection 206. Upper connection 204 and lower connection 206 can comprise threaded connections that can be attached to threaded drill pipe segments of drill string 150 using known methods. For example, in one embodiment, sensor calibration tool 162 can be attached to drill pipe segment or segments that are in a mouse hole at the rig, and the drill pipe and tool combination then attached to drill string 150. In another embodiment, sensor calibration tool 162 can be threaded directly to a drill pipe that is already attached to drill string 150.


Sensor calibration tool 162 as shown in FIG. 2 also includes a sensor bank 210 that includes multiple individual tool sensors to measure operational parameters, as described above. Sensor bank 210 is described in further detail in FIG. 3. Sensor calibration tool 162 also includes power source 212 which can include one or more batteries. In some embodiments, power can be provided from another source (for example, a power cable and/or a fluid turbine) in lieu of or in addition to batteries. Communication module 214 can include a wireless transmitter (such as wi-fi, Bluetooth, laser, or acoustic) or other suitable means for transmitting sensor data. Sensor calibration tool 162 can further include a memory module (not shown). In some embodiments, the memory module can comprise a SDD or HDD or similar memory system and a USB interface.



FIG. 3 is a drawing of a sensor bank on a sensor calibration tool 162 in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure. The features of sensor bank the sensor bank illustrated in FIG. 3 are described in reference to the elements described in reference to FIGS. 1 and 2.


In the illustrated embodiment, the sensor bank illustrated in FIG. 3 is sensor bank 210 of FIG. 2 and is disposed on mandrel 202. In the illustrated embodiment, sensor bank 210 includes eight tool sensors: weight tool sensor 310, fluid pressure tool sensor 312, flow tool sensor 314, temperature tool sensor 316, torque tool sensor 318, RPM tool sensor 320, vibration tool sensor 322, acoustic tool sensor 324. Each tool sensor can measure a respective operational parameter. In some embodiments, sensor bank 210 may include a different number (for example, fewer) tool sensors and/or sensors for different and/or additional operational parameters than as described above. Sensor data from the tool sensors can be compared to rig sensor data for the corresponding operational parameter, as described above in reference to FIG. 1.


Specifically, for example, weight tool sensor 310 can measure the weight of drill string 150, and data from weight tool sensor 310 can be compared to data from hook load rig sensor 170. Fluid pressure tool sensor 312 can measure the pressure of drilling fluid flowing through drill string 150, and data from fluid pressure tool sensor 312 can be compared to data from fluid pressure rig sensor 172. Flow tool sensor 314 can measure the flow rate of drilling fluid flowing through drill string 150 and data from flow tool sensor 314 can be compared to data from flow rig sensor 174. Temperature tool sensor 316 can measure the temperature of drilling fluid flowing through drill string 150, and data from temperature tool sensor 316 can be compared to data from temperature rig sensor 176. Torque tool sensor 318 can measure a torque load of drill string 150, and data from torque tool sensor 318 can be compared to data from torque rig sensor 178. RPM tool sensor 320 can measure the frequency of rotation of drill string 150, and data from RPM tool sensor 320 can be compared to data from RPM rig sensor 180. Vibration tool sensor 322 can measure vibrations of drill string 150, and data from vibration tool sensor 322 can be compared to data from vibration rig sensor 182. Acoustic tool sensor 324 can measure noise or other acoustic signals at or near the top of drill string 150, and data from acoustic tool sensor 324 can be compared to data from acoustic rig sensor 184.



FIGS. 4A and 4B are drawings of a sensor calibration tool in accordance with an alternative embodiment of the present disclosure. In the embodiment shown in FIG. 4, the sensor calibration tool is configured as a clamp that can be attached to the exterior of drill string 150.


Referring to FIG. 4A, sensor calibration clamp tool 400 includes a body 402 that splits in half. In FIG. 4A, sensor calibration clamp tool 400 is in an open position revealing interior surface 403. Interior surface 403 includes latching mechanisms 404 which are configured to attach to an exterior surface of a drill string (such as drill string 150 of FIG. 1), as shown in FIG. 4B.


Like sensor calibration tool 162 of FIG. 2, sensor calibration clamp tool 400 includes a sensor bank 210, a power source 212, and a communication module 214. Sensor bank 210, power source 212, and communication module 214 have a structure and function as described in reference to FIG. 3.


Sensor calibration clamp tool 400 can, in some embodiments, be more easily attachable and detachable from the drill string than sensor calibration tool 162, resulting in further cost and time savings. In some embodiments, sensor bank 210 of sensor calibration clamp tool 400 may have the same suite of tool sensors as sensor calibration tool 162. In some embodiments, sensor bank 210 of calibration clamp tool 400 may have a different suite and/or a different number of tool sensors than the sensor bank of sensor calibration tool 162. For example, in some embodiments, sensor calibration clamp tool 400 can include tool sensors for torque, RPM, and vibration, but not include sensors for flow, pressure, and/or temperature.



FIG. 5 is a process flow diagram of a method for determining an accuracy of a rig sensor in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure. The method is described with reference to the components described in reference to FIGS. 1-2.


Referring to FIG. 5, method 500 begins at block 502 with attaching a sensor calibration tool (such as sensor calibration tool 162) to a drill string (such as drill string 150). As described in reference to FIGS. 1 and 2, the sensor calibration tool includes on or many tool sensors, each of which is configured to measure a respective operational parameter.


As described in reference to FIG. 1, the drill string can be disposed at least partially within a wellbore and supported by a surface rig system and the sensor calibration tool can be positioned on the drill string at a surface location proximate to the surface rig system. Proceeding to block 504, a receiver such as a data gathering and analysis module 190 receives a tool sensor measurement of the respective operational parameter from one of the tool sensors.


Proceeding to block 506, the data gathering and analysis module or other suitable receiver receives a rig sensor measurement from a rig sensor positioned on a surface component of the surface rig system, of the same operational parameter that was also measured by the tool sensor operational parameter


Proceeding to block 508, a difference between the rig sensor measurement and the tool sensor measurement is determined. This can be done manually by an operator or automatically by the data gathering and analysis module.


In some embodiments, the difference can be compared to a difference threshold. If the difference threshold is exceeded, the data gathering and analysis module can transmit an alert to the operator.


Proceeding to block 510, the rig sensor is calibrated based on the comparison of the tool sensor measurement with the rig sensor measurement. Calibration can be done manually or automatically as described in reference to FIG. 1.


In this disclosure, the terms “a,” “an,” or “the” are used to include one or more than one unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. The term “or” is used to refer to a nonexclusive “or” unless otherwise indicated. The statement “at least one of A and B” has the same meaning as “A, B, or A and B.” In addition, it is to be understood that the phraseology or terminology employed in this disclosure, and not otherwise defined, is for the purpose of description only and not of limitation. Any use of section headings is intended to aid reading of the document and is not to be interpreted as limiting; information that is relevant to a section heading may occur within or outside of that particular section.


In this disclosure, “approximately” or “substantially” means a deviation or allowance of up to 10 percent (%) and any variation from a mentioned value is within the tolerance limits of any machinery used to manufacture the part. Likewise, “about” can also allow for a degree of variability in a value or range, for example, within 10%, within 5%, or within 1% of a stated value or of a stated limit of a range.


Values expressed in a range format should be interpreted in a flexible manner to include not only the numerical values explicitly recited as the limits of the range, but also to include all the individual numerical values or sub-ranges encompassed within that range as if each numerical value and sub-range is explicitly recited. For example, a range of “0.1% to about 5%” or “0.1% to 5%” should be interpreted to include about 0.1% to about 5%, as well as the individual values (for example, 1%, 2%, 3%, and 4%) and the sub-ranges (for example, 0.1% to 0.5%, 1.1% to 2.2%, 3.3% to 4.4%) within the indicated range. The statement “X to Y” has the same meaning as “about X to about Y,” unless indicated otherwise. Likewise, the statement “X, Y, or Z” has the same meaning as “about X, about Y, or about Z,” unless indicated otherwise.


While this disclosure contains many specific implementation details, these should not be construed as limitations on the subject matter or on what may be claimed, but rather as descriptions of features that may be specific to particular implementations. Certain features that are described in this disclosure in the context of separate implementations can also be implemented, in combination, in a single implementation. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single implementation can also be implemented in multiple implementations, separately, or in any suitable sub-combination. Moreover, although previously described features may be described as acting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, one or more features from a claimed combination can, in some cases, be excised from the combination, and the claimed combination may be directed to a sub-combination or variation of a sub-combination.


Particular implementations of the subject matter have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications, substitutions, and alterations may be made. While operations are depicted in the drawings or claims in a particular order, this should not be understood as requiring that such operations be performed in the particular order shown or in sequential order, or that all illustrated operations be performed (some operations may be considered optional), to achieve desirable results. Accordingly, the previously described example implementations do not define or constrain this disclosure.

Claims
  • 1. A method comprising: attaching, to a drill string disposed at least partially within a wellbore and supported by a surface rig system, a sensor calibration clamp tool, the sensor calibration clamp tool positioned on the drill string at a surface location proximate to the surface rig system, wherein the sensor calibration tool comprises a sensor bank comprising a plurality of tool sensors, each of the plurality of tool sensors configured to measure a respective operational parameter of a plurality of operational parameters;conducting sensor calibration while the sensor calibration clamp tool is attached to the drill string at the surface location, wherein the sensor calibration comprises: receiving, from a first tool sensor of the plurality of tool sensors, a first tool sensor measurement of a first operational parameter of the plurality of operational parameters;receiving, from a first rig sensor positioned on a first surface component of the surface rig system, a first rig sensor measurement of the first operational parameter; andcalibrating the first rig sensor based on a comparison of the first tool sensor measurement with the first rig sensor measurement; andwhile the drill string is lowered downhole, continuing to position the sensor calibration clamp tool on the drill string at the surface location by detaching and re-attaching the sensor calibration clamp tool to the drill string.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the first tool sensor measurement and the first rig sensor measurement each comprise a respective plurality of measurements of the first operational parameter over a period of time.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the sensor calibration tool further comprises a memory module, and further comprising storing the first rig sensor measurement in the memory module.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the receiving of the first tool sensor measurement and the receiving of the first rig sensor measurement are by a data gathering and analysis module comprising a computer system comprising: one or more processors; anda non-transitory computer readable medium storing instructions executable by the one or more processors to perform operations.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the sensor calibration tool further comprises a wireless transmitter, and further comprising transmitting from the sensor calibration tool via wireless telemetry the first tool sensor measurement to the data gathering and analysis module.
  • 6. The method of claim 4, further comprising: calculating, by the data gathering and analysis module, a difference between the first tool sensor measurement and the first rig sensor measurement;comparing, by the data gathering and analysis module, the difference to a stored difference threshold; andtransmitting, by the data gathering and analysis module, an alert in response to the difference exceeding the stored difference threshold.
  • 7. The method of claim 4, further comprising: storing, by the data gathering and analysis module, historical measurements from the first rig sensor of the first operational parameter; andadjusting, by the data gathering and analysis module, the historical measurements based in part on the comparison of the first tool sensor measurement with the first rig sensor measurement.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the first operational parameter comprises at least one of: a frequency of rotation of the drill string;a pressure of fluid pumped through a stand pipe line and down the drill string;a flow rate of fluid pumped through the stand pipe line and down the drill string;a temperature of fluid pumped through the stand pipe line and down the drill string;a torque load of the drill string;a frequency of mud pump strokes;a weight of the drill string;vibrations in the drill string; oracoustic signals in proximity of the drill string.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the first surface component of the surface rig system comprises at least one of: a stand pipe line;a top drive;a mud pump;a mud pit;a rotary table; ora draw works for a drill line.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the first rig sensor is included in a plurality of rig sensors, each rig sensor positioned on a respective one of a plurality of surface components of the surface rig system, each rig sensor configured to measure a respective one of the plurality of operational parameters, and wherein the method further comprises: receiving, from each tool sensor in the tool sensor bank, a respective tool sensor measurement of the respective operational parameter for which the tool sensor is configured to measure;receiving, from each of a plurality of rig sensors, a respective rig sensor measurement of the respective operational parameter for which the surface rig sensor is configured to measure;calibrating each of the plurality of rig sensors based on a comparison of the respective tool sensor measurement with the respective rig sensor measurement of the respective operational parameter for which the rig sensor is configured to measure.
  • 11. A drilling sensor calibration system, comprising: a surface rig system configured to support a drill string disposed at least partially within a wellbore;a first rig sensor positioned on a first surface component of the surface rig system, the first rig sensor configured to measure a first operational parameter of a plurality of operational parameters;a sensor calibration clamp tool comprising a sensor bank comprising a plurality of tool sensors, each of the plurality of tool sensors configured to measure a respective operational parameter of the plurality of operational parameters, wherein the sensor calibration clamp tool is configured to be attached, removed, and re-attached to the drill string to continue to position the sensor calibration clamp tool on the drill string at a surface location proximate to the surface rig system as the drill string is lowered downhole within the wellbore; anda data gathering and analysis module, the data gathering and analysis module comprising a computer system comprising: one or more processors; anda non-transitory computer readable medium storing instructions executable by the one or more processors to perform operations comprising, while the sensor calibration clamp tool is attached to the drill string at the surface location: receiving, from a first tool sensor of the plurality of tool sensors, a first tool sensor measurement of a first operational parameter of the plurality of operational parameters;receiving, from the first rig sensor, the first rig sensor measurement of the first operational parameter; anddisplaying a comparison of the first tool sensor measurement with the first rig sensor measurement.
  • 12. The system of claim 11, wherein the operations further comprise calibrating, while the sensor calibration clamp tool is attached to the drill string at the surface location, the first rig sensor based on a comparison of the first tool sensor measurement with the first rig sensor measurement.
  • 13. The system of claim 11, wherein the first tool sensor measurement comprises a plurality of measurements over a period of time.
  • 14. The system of claim 11, wherein the sensor calibration tool further comprises a memory module, and further comprising storing the first rig sensor measurement in the memory module.
  • 15. The system of claim 11, wherein the sensor calibration tool further comprises a wireless transmitter, and further comprising transmitting from the sensor calibration tool via wireless telemetry the first tool sensor measurement to the data gathering and analysis module.
  • 16. The system of claim 11, wherein the operations further comprise: calculating, by the data gathering and analysis module, a difference between the first tool sensor measurement and the first rig sensor measurement;comparing, by the data gathering and analysis module, the difference to a stored difference threshold; andtransmitting, by the data gathering and analysis module, an alert in response to the difference exceeding the stored difference threshold.
  • 17. The system of claim 11, wherein the operations further comprise: storing, by the data gathering and analysis module, historical measurements from the first rig sensor of the first operational parameter; andadjusting, by the data gathering and analysis module, the historical measurements based in part on the comparison of the first tool sensor measurement with the first rig sensor measurement.
  • 18. The system of claim 11, wherein the first operational parameter comprises at least one of: a frequency of rotation of the drill string;a pressure of fluid pumped through a stand pipe line and down the drill string;a flow rate of fluid pumped through the stand pipe line and down the drill string;a temperature of fluid pumped through the stand pipe line and down the drill string;a torque load of the drill string;a frequency of mud pump strokes;a weight of the drill string;vibrations in the drill string; oracoustic signals in proximity of the drill string.
  • 19. The system of claim 11, wherein the first surface component of the surface rig system comprises at least one of: a stand pipe line;a top drive;a mud pump;a mud pit;a rotary table; ora draw works for a drill line.
  • 20. The system of claim 11, wherein the first rig sensor is included in a plurality of rig sensors, each rig sensor positioned on a respective one of a plurality of surface components of the surface rig system, each rig sensor configured to measure a respective one of the plurality of operational parameters, and wherein the operations further comprise: receiving, from each tool sensor in the tool sensor bank, a respective sensor measurement of the respective operational parameter for which the tool sensor is configured to measure;receiving, from each of a plurality of rig sensors, a respective sensor measurement of the respective operational parameter for which the rig sensor is configured to measure; anddisplaying a comparison of the respective tool sensor measurement with the respective rig sensor measurement of the respective operational parameter for which the rig sensor is configured to measure.
US Referenced Citations (383)
Number Name Date Kind
891957 Schubert Jun 1908 A
2043225 Armentrout et al. Jun 1936 A
2110913 Lowrey Mar 1938 A
2227729 Lynes Jan 1941 A
2286673 Douglas Jun 1942 A
2305062 Church et al. Dec 1942 A
2344120 Baker Mar 1944 A
2757738 Ritchey Sep 1948 A
2509608 Penfield May 1950 A
2688369 Broyles Sep 1954 A
2690897 Clark Oct 1954 A
2719363 Richard et al. Oct 1955 A
2795279 Erich Jun 1957 A
2799641 Gordon Jul 1957 A
2805045 Goodwin Sep 1957 A
2822150 Muse et al. Feb 1958 A
2841226 Conrad et al. Jul 1958 A
2899000 Medders et al. Aug 1959 A
2927775 Hildebrandt Mar 1960 A
3016244 Friedrich et al. Jan 1962 A
3028915 Jennings Apr 1962 A
3087552 Graham Apr 1963 A
3102599 Hillbum Sep 1963 A
3103975 Hanson Sep 1963 A
3104711 Haagensen Sep 1963 A
3114875 Haagensen Dec 1963 A
3133592 Tomberlin May 1964 A
3137347 Parker Jun 1964 A
3149672 Joseph et al. Sep 1964 A
3169577 Erich Feb 1965 A
3170519 Haagensen Feb 1965 A
3211220 Erich Oct 1965 A
3220478 Kinzbach Nov 1965 A
3236307 Brown Feb 1966 A
3253336 Brown May 1966 A
3268003 Essary Aug 1966 A
3331439 Lawrence Jul 1967 A
3428125 Parker Feb 1969 A
3468373 Smith Sep 1969 A
3522848 New Aug 1970 A
3547192 Claridge et al. Dec 1970 A
3547193 Gill Dec 1970 A
3642066 Gill Feb 1972 A
3656564 Brown Apr 1972 A
3696866 Dryden Oct 1972 A
3839791 Feamster Oct 1974 A
3862662 Kern Jan 1975 A
3874450 Kern Apr 1975 A
3931856 Barnes Jan 1976 A
3946809 Hagedorn Mar 1976 A
3948319 Pritchett Apr 1976 A
4008762 Fisher et al. Feb 1977 A
4010799 Kern et al. Mar 1977 A
4064211 Wood Dec 1977 A
4084637 Todd Apr 1978 A
4135579 Rowland et al. Jan 1979 A
4140179 Kasevich et al. Feb 1979 A
4140180 Bridges et al. Feb 1979 A
4144935 Bridges et al. Mar 1979 A
4191493 Hansson et al. Mar 1980 A
4193448 Jearnbey Mar 1980 A
4193451 Dauphine Mar 1980 A
4196329 Rowland et al. Apr 1980 A
4199025 Carpenter Apr 1980 A
4265307 Elkins May 1981 A
RE30738 Bridges et al. Sep 1981 E
4301865 Kasevich et al. Nov 1981 A
4320801 Rowland et al. Mar 1982 A
4334928 Hara Jun 1982 A
4337653 Chauffe Jul 1982 A
4343651 Yazu et al. Aug 1982 A
4354559 Johnson Oct 1982 A
4373581 Toellner Feb 1983 A
4394170 Sawaoka et al. Jul 1983 A
4396062 Iskander Aug 1983 A
4412585 Bouck Nov 1983 A
4413642 Smith et al. Nov 1983 A
4449585 Bridges et al. May 1984 A
4457365 Kasevich et al. Jul 1984 A
4470459 Copland Sep 1984 A
4476926 Bridges et al. Oct 1984 A
4484627 Perkins Nov 1984 A
4485868 Sresty et al. Dec 1984 A
4485869 Sresty et al. Dec 1984 A
4487257 Dauphine Dec 1984 A
4495990 Titus et al. Jan 1985 A
4498535 Bridges Feb 1985 A
4499948 Perkins Feb 1985 A
4508168 Heeren Apr 1985 A
4513815 Rundell et al. Apr 1985 A
4524826 Savage Jun 1985 A
4524827 Bridges et al. Jun 1985 A
4545435 Bridges et al. Oct 1985 A
4553592 Looney et al. Nov 1985 A
4557327 Kinley et al. Dec 1985 A
4576231 Dowling et al. Mar 1986 A
4583589 Kasevich Apr 1986 A
4592423 Savage et al. Jun 1986 A
4612988 Segalman Sep 1986 A
4620593 Haagensen Nov 1986 A
4636934 Schwendemann Jan 1987 A
RE32345 Wood Mar 1987 E
4660636 Rundell et al. Apr 1987 A
4705108 Little et al. Nov 1987 A
4817711 Jearnbey Apr 1989 A
5012863 Springer May 1991 A
5018580 Skipper May 1991 A
5037704 Nakai et al. Aug 1991 A
5055180 Klaila Oct 1991 A
5068819 Misra et al. Nov 1991 A
5070952 Neff Dec 1991 A
5074355 Lennon Dec 1991 A
5082054 Kiamanesh Jan 1992 A
5092056 Deaton Mar 1992 A
5107705 Wraight et al. Apr 1992 A
5107931 Valka et al. Apr 1992 A
5228518 Wilson et al. Jul 1993 A
5236039 Edelstein et al. Aug 1993 A
5278550 Rhein-Knudsen et al. Jan 1994 A
5319272 Raad Jun 1994 A
5388648 Jordan, Jr. Feb 1995 A
5490598 Adams Feb 1996 A
5501248 Kiest, Jr. Mar 1996 A
5690826 Cravello Nov 1997 A
5803186 Berger et al. Sep 1998 A
5803666 Keller Sep 1998 A
5813480 Zaleski, Jr. et al. Sep 1998 A
5853049 Keller Dec 1998 A
5890540 Pia et al. Apr 1999 A
5899274 Frauenfeld et al. May 1999 A
5947213 Angle Sep 1999 A
5955666 Mullins Sep 1999 A
5958236 Bakula Sep 1999 A
RE36362 Jackson Nov 1999 E
6012526 Jennings et al. Jan 2000 A
6032742 Tomlin et al. Mar 2000 A
6041860 Nazzal et al. Mar 2000 A
6047239 Berger et al. Apr 2000 A
6096436 Inspektor Aug 2000 A
6170531 Jung et al. Jan 2001 B1
6173795 McGarian et al. Jan 2001 B1
6189611 Kasevich Feb 2001 B1
6206108 MacDonald et al. Mar 2001 B1
6254844 Takeuchi et al. Jul 2001 B1
6268726 Prammer Jul 2001 B1
6269953 Seyffert et al. Aug 2001 B1
6290068 Adams et al. Sep 2001 B1
6305471 Milloy Oct 2001 B1
6325216 Seyffert et al. Dec 2001 B1
6328111 Bearden et al. Dec 2001 B1
6330913 Langseth et al. Dec 2001 B1
6354371 O'Blanc Mar 2002 B1
6371302 Adams et al. Apr 2002 B1
6413399 Kasevich Jul 2002 B1
6443228 Aronstam Sep 2002 B1
6454099 Adams et al. Sep 2002 B1
6510947 Schulte et al. Jan 2003 B1
6534980 Toufaily et al. Feb 2003 B2
6544411 Varandaraj Apr 2003 B2
6561269 Brown et al. May 2003 B1
6571877 Van Bilderbeek Jun 2003 B1
6607080 Winkler et al. Aug 2003 B2
6612384 Singh et al. Sep 2003 B1
6622554 Manke et al. Sep 2003 B2
6623850 Kukino et al. Sep 2003 B2
6629610 Adams et al. Oct 2003 B1
6637092 Menzel Oct 2003 B1
6648082 Schultz et al. Nov 2003 B2
6678616 Winkler et al. Jan 2004 B1
6722504 Schulte et al. Apr 2004 B2
6741000 Newcomb May 2004 B2
6761230 Cross et al. Jul 2004 B2
6814141 Huh et al. Nov 2004 B2
6827145 Fotland et al. Dec 2004 B2
6845818 Tutuncu et al. Jan 2005 B2
6850068 Chernali et al. Feb 2005 B2
6895678 Ash et al. May 2005 B2
6912177 Smith Jun 2005 B2
6971265 Sheppard et al. Dec 2005 B1
6993432 Jenkins et al. Jan 2006 B2
7000777 Adams et al. Feb 2006 B2
7013992 Tessari et al. Mar 2006 B2
7048051 McQueen May 2006 B2
7063155 Ruttley Jun 2006 B2
7086463 Ringgenberg et al. Aug 2006 B2
7091460 Kinzer Aug 2006 B2
7109457 Kinzer Sep 2006 B2
7115847 Kinzer Oct 2006 B2
7124819 Ciglenec et al. Oct 2006 B2
7168507 Downton Jan 2007 B2
7216767 Schulte et al. May 2007 B2
7312428 Kinzer Dec 2007 B2
7322776 Webb et al. Jan 2008 B2
7331385 Symington Feb 2008 B2
7376514 Habashy et al. May 2008 B2
7387174 Lurie Jun 2008 B2
7445041 O'Brien Nov 2008 B2
7455117 Hall et al. Nov 2008 B1
7461693 Considine et al. Dec 2008 B2
7484561 Bridges Feb 2009 B2
7539548 Dhawan May 2009 B2
7562708 Cogliandro et al. Jul 2009 B2
7629497 Pringle Dec 2009 B2
7631691 Symington et al. Dec 2009 B2
7647980 Corre et al. Jan 2010 B2
7650269 Rodney Jan 2010 B2
7677673 Tranquilla et al. Mar 2010 B2
7730625 Blake Jun 2010 B2
7779903 Bailey et al. Aug 2010 B2
7951482 Ichinose et al. May 2011 B2
7980392 Varco Jul 2011 B2
8067865 Savant Nov 2011 B2
8237444 Simon Aug 2012 B2
8245792 Trinh et al. Aug 2012 B2
8275549 Sabag et al. Sep 2012 B2
8286734 Hannegan et al. Oct 2012 B2
8484858 Brannigan et al. Jul 2013 B2
8511404 Rasheed Aug 2013 B2
8526171 Wu et al. Sep 2013 B2
8528668 Rasheed Sep 2013 B2
8567491 Lurie Oct 2013 B2
8794062 DiFoggio et al. Aug 2014 B2
8884624 Homan et al. Nov 2014 B2
8925213 Sallwasser Jan 2015 B2
8960215 Cui et al. Feb 2015 B2
8973680 MacKenzie Mar 2015 B2
9051810 Cuffe et al. Jun 2015 B1
9109429 Xu et al. Aug 2015 B2
9217323 Clark Dec 2015 B2
9222350 Vaughn et al. Dec 2015 B2
9238953 Fleming et al. Jan 2016 B2
9238961 Bedouet Jan 2016 B2
9250339 Ramirez Feb 2016 B2
9353589 Hekelaar May 2016 B2
9394782 DiGiovanni et al. Jul 2016 B2
9435159 Scott Sep 2016 B2
9464487 Zurn Oct 2016 B1
9470059 Zhou Oct 2016 B2
9494010 Flores Nov 2016 B2
9494032 Roberson et al. Nov 2016 B2
9512708 Hay Dec 2016 B2
9528366 Selman et al. Dec 2016 B2
9562987 Guner et al. Feb 2017 B2
9617815 Scwartze et al. Apr 2017 B2
9664011 Kruspe et al. May 2017 B2
9702211 Tinnen Jul 2017 B2
9731471 Schaedler et al. Aug 2017 B2
9739141 Zeng et al. Aug 2017 B2
9845653 Hannegan et al. Dec 2017 B2
9885232 Close et al. Feb 2018 B2
10000983 Jackson et al. Jun 2018 B2
10174577 Leuchtenberg et al. Jan 2019 B2
10233372 Ramasamy et al. Mar 2019 B2
10329877 Simpson et al. Jun 2019 B2
10392910 Walton et al. Aug 2019 B2
10394193 Li et al. Aug 2019 B2
10544640 Hekelaar et al. Jan 2020 B2
20020066563 Langseth et al. Jun 2002 A1
20030137430 Chalitsios Jul 2003 A1
20030159776 Graham Aug 2003 A1
20030230526 Okabayshi et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040182574 Sarmad et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040256103 Batarseh Dec 2004 A1
20050022987 Green et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050092523 McCaskill et al. May 2005 A1
20050259512 Mandal Nov 2005 A1
20060016592 Wu Jan 2006 A1
20060106541 Hassan et al. May 2006 A1
20060144620 Cooper Jul 2006 A1
20060185843 Smith Aug 2006 A1
20060248949 Gregory et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060249307 Ritter Nov 2006 A1
20070131591 Pringle Jun 2007 A1
20070137852 Considine et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070175633 Kosmala Aug 2007 A1
20070187089 Bridges Aug 2007 A1
20070204994 Wimmersperg Sep 2007 A1
20070289736 Kearl et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080007421 Liu et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080047337 Chemali et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080053652 Corre et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080173480 Annaiyappa et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080190822 Young Aug 2008 A1
20080308282 Standridge et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090153354 Daussin Jun 2009 A1
20090164125 Bordakov et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090178809 Jeffryes et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090259446 Zhang et al. Oct 2009 A1
20100006339 Desai Jan 2010 A1
20100089583 Xu et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100276209 Yong et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100282511 Maranuk Nov 2010 A1
20110011576 Cavender et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110120732 Lurie May 2011 A1
20110155368 El-Khazindar Jun 2011 A1
20110169353 Endo Jul 2011 A1
20110272147 Beasley et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120012319 Dennis Jan 2012 A1
20120111578 Tverlid May 2012 A1
20120132418 McClung May 2012 A1
20120152543 Davis Jun 2012 A1
20120173196 Miszewski Jul 2012 A1
20120186817 Gibson et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120222854 McClung, III Sep 2012 A1
20120227983 Lymberopoulous et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120273187 Hall Nov 2012 A1
20130008653 Schultz et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130008671 Booth Jan 2013 A1
20130025943 Kumar Jan 2013 A1
20130076525 Vu et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130119830 Hautz May 2013 A1
20130125642 Parfitt May 2013 A1
20130126164 Sweatman et al. May 2013 A1
20130146359 Koederitz Jun 2013 A1
20130213637 Kearl Aug 2013 A1
20130255936 Statoilydro et al. Oct 2013 A1
20140083771 Clark Mar 2014 A1
20140183143 Cady et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140231075 Springett et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140231147 Bozso et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140238658 Wilson et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140246235 Yao Sep 2014 A1
20140251894 Larson et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140265337 Harding et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140278111 Gerrie et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140291023 Edbury Oct 2014 A1
20140300895 Pope et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140333754 Graves et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140360778 Batarseh Dec 2014 A1
20140375468 Wilkinson et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150020908 Warren Jan 2015 A1
20150021240 Wardell et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150027724 Symms Jan 2015 A1
20150083422 Pritchard Mar 2015 A1
20150091737 Richardson et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150101864 May Apr 2015 A1
20150159467 Hartman et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150211362 Rogers Jul 2015 A1
20150267500 Van Dongen Sep 2015 A1
20150290878 Houben et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150300151 Mohaghegh Oct 2015 A1
20160053572 Snoswell Feb 2016 A1
20160053604 Abbassian Feb 2016 A1
20160076357 Hbaieb Mar 2016 A1
20160115783 Zeng et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160130928 Torrione May 2016 A1
20160153240 Braga et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160160106 Jamison et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160164377 Gauthier Jun 2016 A1
20160237810 Beaman et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160247316 Whalley et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160356125 Bello et al. Dec 2016 A1
20170051785 Cooper Feb 2017 A1
20170161885 Parmeshwar et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170234104 James Aug 2017 A1
20170292376 Kumar et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170314335 Kosonde et al. Nov 2017 A1
20170328196 Shi et al. Nov 2017 A1
20170328197 Shi et al. Nov 2017 A1
20170342776 Bullock et al. Nov 2017 A1
20170343006 Ehrsann Nov 2017 A1
20170346371 Gruetzner Nov 2017 A1
20170350201 Shi et al. Dec 2017 A1
20170350241 Shi Dec 2017 A1
20180010030 Ramasamy et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180010419 Livescu et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180010450 Forstner Jan 2018 A1
20180171772 Rodney Jun 2018 A1
20180187498 Soto et al. Jul 2018 A1
20180265416 Ishida et al. Sep 2018 A1
20180326679 Weisenberg et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180334883 Williamson Nov 2018 A1
20180363404 Faugstad Dec 2018 A1
20190049054 Gunnarsson et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190079210 Ma Mar 2019 A1
20190101872 Li Apr 2019 A1
20190227499 Li et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190257180 Kriesels et al. Aug 2019 A1
20190316463 Pfrenger et al. Oct 2019 A1
20200032638 Ezzeddine Jan 2020 A1
20200182038 Soukup Jun 2020 A1
20200220431 Wrighton Jul 2020 A1
20200326226 Camacho Cardenas Oct 2020 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (64)
Number Date Country
1226325 Sep 1987 CA
2249432 Sep 2005 CA
2537585 Aug 2006 CA
2669721 Jul 2011 CA
2594042 Aug 2012 CA
200989202 Dec 2007 CN
203232293 Oct 2013 CN
204627586 Sep 2015 CN
107462222 Dec 2017 CN
110571475 Dec 2019 CN
102008001607 Nov 2009 DE
102012022453 May 2014 DE
102013200450 Jul 2014 DE
102012205757 Aug 2014 DE
2317068 May 2011 EP
2574722 Apr 2013 EP
2737173 Jun 2014 EP
2124855 Feb 1984 GB
2357305 Jun 2001 GB
2399515 Sep 2004 GB
2422125 Jul 2006 GB
2532967 Jun 2016 GB
2009067609 Apr 2009 JP
4275896 Jun 2009 JP
5013156 Aug 2012 JP
2013110910 Jun 2013 JP
343139 Nov 2018 NO
20161842 May 2019 NO
2282708 Aug 2006 RU
122531 Nov 2012 RU
WO 1995035429 Dec 1995 WO
WO 1997021904 Jun 1997 WO
WO 2000025942 May 2000 WO
WO 2000031374 Jun 2000 WO
WO 2001042622 Jun 2001 WO
WO 2002020944 Mar 2002 WO
WO 2002068793 Sep 2002 WO
WO 2004042185 May 2004 WO
WO 2007049026 May 2007 WO
WO 2007070305 Jun 2007 WO
WO 2008146017 Dec 2008 WO
WO 2009020889 Feb 2009 WO
WO 2009113895 Sep 2009 WO
WO 2010105177 Sep 2010 WO
WO 2011038170 Mar 2011 WO
WO 2011042622 Jun 2011 WO
WO 2012007407 Jan 2012 WO
WO 2013016095 Jan 2013 WO
WO 2013148510 Oct 2013 WO
WO 2014127035 Aug 2014 WO
WO 2015095155 Jun 2015 WO
WO 2016178005 Nov 2016 WO
WO 2017011078 Jan 2017 WO
WO 2017132297 Aug 2017 WO
WO 2017196303 Nov 2017 WO
WO 2018022198 Feb 2018 WO
WO 2018169991 Sep 2018 WO
WO 2019040091 Feb 2019 WO
WO 2019055240 Mar 2019 WO
WO 2019089926 May 2019 WO
WO 2019108931 Jun 2019 WO
WO 2019169067 Sep 2019 WO
WO 2019236288 Dec 2019 WO
WO 2019246263 Dec 2019 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (65)
Entry
Akersolutions, “Aker MH CCTC Improving Safety,” Akersolutions, Jan. 2008, 12 pages.
Anwar et al.,“Fog computing: an overview of big IoT data analytics,” Article ID 7157192, Hindawi, Wiley, Wireless communications and mobile computing, May 2018, 2018: 1-22, 23 pages.
Artymiuk et al., “The new drilling control and monitoring system,” Acta Montanistica Slovaca, Sep. 2004, 9:3 (145-151), 7 pages.
Ashby et al., “Coiled Tubing Conveyed Video Camera and Multi-Arm Caliper Liner Damage Diagnostics Post Plug and Perf Frac,” SPE-172622-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference, Mar. 8-11, 2015, 12 pages.
Bestebit, “IADC Dull Grading for PDC Drill Bits,” Beste Bit, SPE/IADC 23939, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), International Association of Drilling Contractors (IADC), 1992, 52 pages.
Bilal et al., “Potentials, trends, and prospects in edge technologies: Fog, cloudlet, mobile edge, and micro data centers,” Computer Networks, Elsevier, Oct. 2017, 130: 94-120, 27 pages.
Carpenter, “Advancing Deepwater Kick Detection,” JPT, 68:5, May 2016, 2 pages.
Commer et al., “New advances in three-dimensional controlled-source electromagnetic inversion,” Geophys. J. Int, 2008, 172: 513-535, 23 pages.
Dickens et al., “An LED array-based light induced fluorescence sensor for real-time process and field monitoring,” Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, Elsevier, Apr. 2011, 158:1 (35-42), 8 pages.
Dong et al., “Dual Substitution and Spark Plasma Sintering to Improve Ionic Conductivity of Garnet Li7La3Zr2O12,” MDPI, Nanomaterials, 9:721, 2019, 10 pages.
Downholediagnostic.com [online] “Acoustic Fluid Level Surveys,” retrieved from URL <https://www.downholediagnostic.com/fluid-level> retrieved on Mar. 27, 2020, available on or before 2018, 13 pages.
edition.cnn.com [online], “Revolutionary gel is five times stronger than steel,” retrieved from URL <https://edition.cnn.com/style/article/hydrogel-steel-japan/index.html>, retrieved on Apr. 2, 2020, available on or before Jul. 16, 2017, 6 pages.
Gemmeke and Ruiter, “3D ultrasound computer tomography for medical imagining,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 580 (1057-1065), Oct. 1, 2007, 9 pages.
Halliburton.com [online], “Drill Bits and Services Solutions Catalogs,” retrieved from URL: <https://www.halliburton.com/content/dam/ps/public/sdbs/sdbs_contents/Books_and_Catalogs/web/DBS-Solution.pdf> on Sep. 26, 2019, Copyright 2014, 64 pages.
Hopkin, “Factor Affecting Cuttings Removal during Rotary Drilling,” Journal of Petroleum Technology 19.06, Jun. 1967, 8 pages.
Ji et al., “Submicron Sized Nb Doped Lithium Garnet for High Ionic Conductivity Solid Electrolyte and Performance of All Solid-State Lithium Battery,” Preprints, doi:10.20944/preprints201912.0307.v1, Dec. 2019, 10 pages.
Johnson et al., “Advanced Deepwater Kick Detection,” IADC/SPE 167990, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), International Association of Drilling Contractors (IADC), presented at the 2014 IADC/SPE Drilling Conference and Exhibition, Mar. 4-6, 2014, 10 pages.
Johnson, “Design and Testing of a Laboratory Ultrasonic Data Acquisition System for Tomography” Thesis for the degree of Master of Science in Mining and Minerals Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Dec. 2, 2004, 108 pages.
King et al., “Atomic layer deposition of TiO2 films on particles in a fluidized bed reactor,” Powder Technology, 183:3 (356-363), Apr. 2008, 8 pages.
Li et al., 3D Printed Hybrid Electrodes for Lithium-ion Batteries, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Washington State University; ECS Transactions, 77:11 (1209-1218), 2017, 11 pages.
Liu et al., “Flow visualization and measurement in flow field of a torque converter,” Mechanic automation and control Engineering, Second International Conference on IEEE, Jul. 15, 2011, 1329-1331, 3 pages.
Liu et al., “Superstrong micro-grained poly crystalline diamond compact through work hardening under high pressure,” Appl. Phys. Lett. Feb. 2018, 112:061901, 6 pages.
Luo et al., “Simple Charts to Determine Hole Cleaning Requirements in Deviated Wells,” IADC/SPE 27486, International Association of Drilling Contractors (IADC), Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the 1994 SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Feb. 15-18, 1994, 7 pages.
Maurer, “The Perfect Cleaning Theory of Rotary Drilling,” Journal of Petroleum Technology 14.11, 1962, 5 pages.
nature.com [online], “Mechanical Behavior of a Soft Hydrogel Reinforced with Three-Dimensional Printed Microfibre Scaffolds,” retrieved from URL <https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-19502-y>, retrieved on Apr. 2, 2020, available on or before Jan. 19, 2018, 47 pages.
Nuth, “Smart oil field distributed computing,” The Industrial Ethernet Book, Nov. 2014, 85:14 (1-3), 3 pages.
Olver, “Compact Antenna Test Ranges,” Seventh International Conference on Antennas and Propagation IEEE , Apr. 15-18, 1991, 10 pages.
Paiaman et al., “Effect of Drilling Fluid Properties on Rate Penetration,” Nafta 60:3 (129-134), 2009, 6 pages.
Parini et al., “Chapter 3: Antenna measurements,” in Theory and Practice of Modern Antenna Range Measurements, IET editorial, 2014, 30 pages.
petrowiki.org [online], “Hole Cleaning,” retrieved on Jan. 25, 2019, retrieved from URL <http://petrowiki.org/Hole_cleaning#Annular-fluid_velocity>, 8 pages.
petrowiki.org [online], “Kicks,” Petrowiki, available on or before Jun. 26, 2015, retrieved on Jan. 24, 2018, retrieved from URL <https://petrowiki.org/Kicks>, 6 pages.
Ranjbar, “Cutting Transport in Inclined and Horizontal Wellbore,” University of Stavanger, Faculty of Science and Technology, Master's Thesis, Jul. 6, 2010, 137 pages.
Rasi, “Hold Cleaning in Large, High-Angle Wellbores,” IADC/SPE 27464, International Association of Drilling Contractors (IADC), Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the 1994 SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, Feb. 15-18, 1994, 12 pages.
rigzone.com [online], “How does Well Control Work?” Rigzone, available on or before 1999, retrieved on Jan. 24, 2019, retrieved from URL <https://www.rigzone.com/training/insight.asp7insight_id=304&c_id>, 5 pages.
Robinson and Morgan, “Effect of Hole Cleaning on Drilling Rate Performance,” Paper Aade-04-Df-Ho-42, AADE 2004 Drilling Fluids Conference, Houston, Texas, Apr. 6-7, 2004, 7 pages.
Robinson, “Economic Consequences of Poor Solids and Control,” AADE 2006 Fluids Conference and Houston, Texas, Apr. 11-12, 2006, 9 pages.
Ruiter et al., “3D ultrasound computer tomography of the breast: A new era?” European Journal of Radiology 81S1, Sep. 2012, 2 pages.
sageoiltools.com [online] “Fluid Level & Dynamometer Instmments for Analysis due Optimization of Oil and Gas Wells,” retrieved from URL <http://www.sageoiltools.com/>, retrieved on Mar. 27, 2020, available on or before 2019, 3 pages.
Schlumberger, “CERTIS: Retrievable, single-trip, production-level isolation system,” www.slb.com/CERTIS, 2017, 2 pages.
Schlumberger, “First Rigless ESP Retrieval and Replacement with Slickline, Offshore Congo: Zeitecs Shuttle System Eliminates Need to Mobilize a Workover Rig,” slb.com/zeitecs, 2016, 1 page.
Schlumberger, “The Lifting Business,” Offshore Engineer, Mar. 2017, 1 page.
Schlumberger, “Zeitecs Shuttle System Decreases ESP Replacement Time by 87%: Customer ESP riglessly retrieved in less than 2 days on coiled tubing,” slb.com/zeitecs, 2015, 1 page.
Schlumberger, “Zeitecs Shuttle System Reduces Deferred Production Even Before ESP is Commissioned, Offshore Africa: Third Party ESP developed fault during installation and was retrieved on rods, enabling operator to continue running tubing without waiting on replacement,” slb.com/zeitecs, 2016, 2 pages.
Schlumberger, “Zeitecs Shuttle: Rigless ESP replacement system,” Brochure, 8 pages.
Schlumberger, “Zeitecs Shuttle: Rigless ESP replacement system,” Schlumberger, 2017, 2 pages.
Sifferman et al., “Drilling cutting transport in full scale vertical annuli,” Journal of Petroleum Technology 26.11, 48th Annual Fall Meeting of the Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, Las Vegas, Sep. 30-Oct. 3, 1973, 12 pages.
slb.com' [online] “Technical Paper: ESP Retrievable Technology: A Solution to Enhance ESP Production While Minimizing Costs,” SPE 156189 presented in 2012, retrieved from URL <http://www.slb.com/resources/technical_papers/artificial_lift/156189.aspx>, retrieved on Nov. 2, 2018, 1 pages.
slb.com' [online], “Zeitecs Shuttle Rigless ESP Replacement System,” retrieved from URL <http://www.slb.com/services/production/artificial_lift/submersible/zeitecs-shuttle.aspx?t=3>, available on or before May 31, 2017, retrieved on Nov. 2, 2018, 3 pages.
Sulzer Metco, “An Introduction to Thermal Spray,” 4, 2013, 24 pages.
Unegbu Celestine Tobenna, “Hole Cleaning Hydraulics,” Universitetet o Stavanger, Faculty of Science and Technology, Master's Thesis, Jun. 15, 2010, 75 pages.
Weatherford, “RFID Advanced Reservoir Management System Optimizes Injection Well Design, Improves Reservoir Management,” Weatherford.com, 2013, 2 pages.
Wei et al., “The Fabrication of All-Solid-State Lithium-Ion Batteries via Spark Plasma Sintering,” Metals, 7:372, 2017, 9 pages.
Wellbore Service Tools: Retrievable tools, “RTTS Packer,” Halliburton: Completion Tools, 2017, 4 pages.
wikipedia.org [online] “Optical Flowmeters,” retrieved from URL <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flow_measurement#Optical_flowmeters>, retrieved on Mar. 27, 2020, available on or before Jan. 2020, 1 page.
wikipedia.org [online] “Ultrasonic Flow Meter,” retrieved from URL <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultrasonic_flow_meter> retrieved on Mar. 27, 2020, available on or before Sep. 2019, 3 pages.
wikipedia.org [online], “Surface roughness,” retrieved from URL <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surface_roughness> retrieved on Apr. 2, 2020, available on or before Oct. 2017, 6 pages.
Williams and Bruce, “Carrying Capacity of Drilling Muds,” Journal of Petroleum Technology, 3.04: 192, 1951, 10 pages.
Xia et al., “A Cutting Concentration Model of a Vertical Wellbore Annulus in Deep-water Drilling Operation and its Application,” Applied Mechanics and Materials, 101-102: 311-314, Sep. 27, 2011, 5 pages.
Xue et al., “Spark plasma sintering plus heat-treatment of Ta-doped Li7La3Zr2O12 solid electrolyte and its ionic conductivity,” Mater. Res. Express 2020, 7:025518, 8 pages.
Zhan et al. “Effect of (β-to-α Phase Transformation on the Microstructural Development and Mechanical Properties of Fine-Grained Silicon Carbide Ceramics,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society 84:5 (945-50), May 2001, 6 pages.
Zhan et al. “Single-wall carbon nanotubes as attractive toughening agents in alumina-based nanocomposites.” Nature Materials 2.1, Jan. 2003, 6 pages.
Zhan et al., “Atomic Layer Deposition on Bulk Quantities of Surfactant Modified Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes,” Journal of American Ceramic Society, 91:3 (831-835), Mar. 2008, 5 pages.
Zhang et al., “Increasing Polypropylene High Temperature Stability by Blending Polypropylene-Bonded Hindered Phenol Antioxidant,” Macromolecules, 51:5 (1927-1936), 2018, 10 pages.
Zhu et al., “Spark Plasma Sintering of Lithium Aluminum Germanium Phosphate Solid Electrolyte and its Electrochemical Properties,” University of British Columbia; Nanomaterials, 9:1086, 2019, 10 pages.
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Appln. No. PCT/US2022/012290, dated Apr. 21, 2022, 14 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20220220845 A1 Jul 2022 US