The invention relates to fall protection apparatus and in particular to a fall protection apparatus of the type having a rigid rail with moveable anchorages to permit a worker to move along a length of a work area.
Many work situations require workers to be positioned on top of platforms or vehicles that cannot be practically protected by a guardrail system enclosing the work area. To prevent the workers from falling from such elevated positions and thereby sustaining serious or mortal injuries, various fall protection systems can be used. In general, fall arrest or fall protection systems are designed to prevent the worker from reaching an unprotected edge or to quickly stop a fall before the worker impacts a lower level. Such systems typically include an anchorage secured to a structure overhead the work area, a safety harness worn by the worker, and a flexible tether line or “lanyard” interconnecting the anchorage to the harness.
One type of fall protection system includes a trolley or other moveable anchorage that is moveably mounted on a track provided by a rigid rail installed parallel to and above, the length of the working area. A moveable anchorage is particularly useful when the work area is narrow and long, for example, on top of a line of vehicles such as buses or rail cars. In general, the moveable anchorage is designed to freely move along the rail by engaging the rail track to permit movement in a longitudinal direction but at the same time preventing the anchorage from separating from the rail or moving in a transverse direction. Consequently, the worker can freely move along the length of the work area with the lanyard being kept at a minimum length at all times so as to reduce the risk of an undesirable pendular swinging motion in the event of a fall.
Rigid rail systems can use various structural members to provide the track, such as, for example, flanged beams, slotted hollow tubes, and flat bars, with the moveable anchorage typically being a wheeled trolley. The rigid rail must be structurally supported on an overhead structure to hold the rail in place and to support the weight of the moveable anchorage and any connected workers in the event of a fall.
Most conventional rigid rail systems use a flanged beam installed in the “I” orientation, having horizontally oriented flanges and a vertically oriented web. The movable anchorage is typically a wheeled trolley having a U-shaped profile whose wheels are supported on the bottom flange straddling the web. Overhead support members are attachment to the top of the flanged-beam for attachment to an overhead structure. Orientation of the flanged beam in the “I” orientation provides the most structurally efficient rail because the greatest amount of material is concentrated at the top and the bottom of the beam to provide greatest strength and stiffness of the beam.
In another type of rigid rail system, a horizontally extending flat bar is installed with the plane of the bar being vertically oriented. The moveable anchorage is typically a wheeled trolley having a C-shaped profile and at least one set of upper and lower flanged wheels rolling on a top edge and bottom edge of the bar, respectively. The bar is supported by periodic and longitudinally spaced horizontal support members attached to a side of the bar, with the periodic support members being located at mid height of the bar so as to not interfere with free movement of the trolley past the supports. A disadvantage of the use of a bar as compared to an I-oriented flanged beam is that the bar has less torsional and transverse bending stiffness, resulting is a significant tendency to buckle in a lateral-torsional mode when subjected to a vertical load. Consequently, the bar does not participate in carrying long-span loadings. Further, to help restrain the bar from lateral-torsional buckling, the bar must be attached to closely spaced, torsionally rigid periodic supports. For example, a bar typically requires periodic support members every 3 to 6 feet, while the same length of I-oriented flanged beam typically requires a support member every 10 to 25 feet. Where overhead attachments are widely spaced, it is necessary to attach the bar to an independent and intermediate structural member, such flanged beam or a tube section, which is capable of carrying vertical loads over the span and the periodic support members are spaced therealong. In either case, the requirement for additional components for using a bar-type rail greatly increases the cost of the completed system.
In some situations, it is desirable to permit two or more workers to independently and freely traverse the entire length of a work area. The solution has been to install separate, parallel rails, with each rail having a moveable anchorage to which one of the workers is connected. Such rails can be supported by independent support members, or the separate rails can be attached to a common supporting member. For example, the MSA “twin track” Sure-Rail™ System (Pittsburgh, Pa.) comprises an assembly of two bar rail systems attached to a central and intermediate support member by periodic support plates, and the intermediate support member is supported from overhead attachments. More particularly, the horizontal periodic support members of each bar are attached to separate vertical support plates, with the support plates in turn being attached to opposing sides of the intermediate central support member. In any case, the need to install separate parallel rails represents significant manufacturing and labor costs.
There is, therefore, a need in the art for an improved rigid rail fall protection apparatus.
The fall protection apparatus of the present invention provides a single substantially horizontally and longitudinally extending rigid rail onto which two laterally spaced apart moveable anchorages are mounted. Each moveable anchorage is adapted to be independently movable along the length of the rail, with the anchorages being permitted to freely bypass one another therealong. Advantageously, two workers attached to separate anchorages can use the fall protection apparatus and pass by each other in an unimpeded manner. Further, as the fall protection apparatus requires only a single rigid rail and associated support system to accomplish this, the rail is simpler and less costly to construct and install than prior art dual rail systems.
In one embodiment, the rigid rail is a flanged beam oriented in the “H” direction to have a horizontally oriented web and opposing vertically oriented flanges, with the moveable anchorages being wheeled trolleys. Each trolley includes at least one set of upper and lower wheels that are positioned to engage an upper and lower edge of one of the flanges for rolling movement therealong. Overhead support members are attached to an upper surface of the web for suspending the apparatus from a structure.
Accordingly, in a broad aspect of the invention, a fall protection apparatus is provided comprising: a longitudinally and substantially horizontally extending rigid rail having a generally H-shaped cross-section comprising opposing substantially vertically oriented first and second tracks laterally spaced apart by a substantially horizontally oriented connecting member extending between the tracks and substantially continuously along the length of the tracks. The first and second tracks support forces from arresting falls imposed by a first and a second moveable anchorage which are adapted to be mounted on the first and second tracks, respectively, for movement along the length of the tracks. An upper or lower surface of the connecting member provides an attachment point to attach the rail to at least one support member, such as a substantially vertical support member. The tracks are sufficiently spaced apart to permit the first and second anchorages to pass by each other and the attachment point while moving along their respective tracks.
As the connecting member extends substantially continuously along the length of the track, the propensity for torsional buckling of the rail when in use is greatly reduced or eliminated, particularly if the connecting member is of sufficient stiffness. The rail also preferably includes stops at either end for arresting movement of the anchorages to prevent the moveable anchorages from falling off the ends.
The invention also provides a fall protection system comprising the fall protection apparatus and attached vertical support members.
Other aspects of the fall protection apparatus are also disclosed.
In drawings which are intended to illustrate embodiments of the invention and which are not intended to limit the scope of the invention:
With reference to
The rail 16 is suspended in place by at least one overhead support member 24 secured to an attachment point 26 on an upper surface 28 of the connecting member 22. Preferably, the support members 24 are substantially vertically extending support members. In an alternative embodiment and as shown in
Overall, the fall protection apparatus 10 is constructed and used in accordance with local safety regulations, as would be appreciated by one skilled in the art.
The connecting member 22 extends substantially continuously along the length of the tracks 20a, 20b. The transverse stiffness of the rail 16 thereby exceeds the vertical stiffness such that the rail 16 does not exhibit lateral-torsional buckling in the gross cross section. The substantially continuous connecting member 22 also supports the tracks 20a, 20b to reduce or eliminate the propensity of lateral torsional buckling of the tracks 20a, 20b themselves, particularly if the connecting member is of sufficient stiffness. Consequently, the connecting member permits the tracks 20a, 20b to participate in carrying main-span loading. Consequently, the structural advantage of a substantially continuous connecting member 22 thereby permits the number of support members 24 to be reduced, thereby reducing manufacturing costs associated with the use of the fall protection apparatus 10.
The rail 16 can be of any suitable construction and fabrication which provides sufficient strength to support the forces from arresting two simultaneous falls, with the tracks 20a, 20b and the connecting member 22 being of sufficient stiffness to prevent lateral torsional buckling, as would be apparent to one skilled in the art. Preferably, the tracks 20a, 20b and the connecting member 22 are integrally formed, such as from a rolled or extruded beam, but can also be formed by welding or joining of each track to the connecting member 22. Conveniently, the rail 16 is an H-oriented flanged structural beam in which the opposing vertical flanges form the first and second tracks 20a, 20b and the web forms the connecting member 22. Despite an H-oriented flanged beam being less structurally efficient than an I-oriented flanged beam, the H-oriented flanged beam can be designed to provide the same moment of inertia or bending strength as an I-oriented flanged beam, as would be apparent to one skilled in the art. Further, while the rail 16 can be a single rail, the rail 16 can also be constructed of one or more rails attached end-to-end to form a single contiguous rail, such as by using a splice plate attached across connecting members 22 of adjacent rails (not shown).
With reference to
In more detail, each trolley 34a, 34b comprises a body 44 to which the upper and lower wheels 40, 42 are rotatably mounted. Preferably, there are two pairs of longitudinally spaced apart upper and lower wheels 40, 42. A lanyard attachment point 46, extends below the body 44 to attach a worker below the fall protection apparatus 10 to one of the trolleys 34a, 34b. As best seen in
As best seen in
The wheels 40, 42 can be fabricated from any suitable material, such as suitable plastic or metal. The wheels 40, 42 are mounted on the trolley body 44 in any suitable manner. For example, as best seen in
Preferably, each trolley 34a, 34b also includes upper and lower safety hooks 70, 72 to prevent the trolley 34a, 34b from falling off the rail 16 should one or more of the trolley wheels 40, 42 fall off or break. The upper hook 70 extends laterally inwardly and downwardly from the trolley body 44 while the lower safety hook 72 extends laterally inwardly and upwardly from the trolley body 44, with each hook 70, 72 having a portion 74 adjacent an inner side 76 of the track 20a, 20b on which the trolley 34a, 34b is respectively mounted. Preferably, the upper safety hook 70 is integrally formed with the trolley body 44 while the lower safety hook 72 may be removably attached to permit installation and removal of the trolley 34a, 34b on the rail 16 if the ends of the tracks 20a, 20b are blocked.
While the moveable anchorage 18a, 18b has thus far been described as a wheeled trolley 34a, 34b, other suitable varieties of moveable anchorages 18a, 18b are contemplated, as would be apparent to one skilled in the art. For example, with reference to
With reference to
Although preferred embodiments of the invention have been described in some detail herein above, those skilled in the art will recognize that various substitutions and modifications of the invention may be made without departing from the scope of the invention as defined by the claims as defined herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
299394 | Jenkins | May 1884 | A |
2920581 | Cook et al. | Jan 1960 | A |
3159978 | De Lillo | Dec 1964 | A |
3729827 | Perminov | May 1973 | A |
4572329 | Kleveborn | Feb 1986 | A |
5526896 | O'Rourke | Jun 1996 | A |
5592883 | Andress, III | Jan 1997 | A |
5606430 | Roby et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5799760 | Small | Sep 1998 | A |
6269904 | Morhaus | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6334507 | Westerweel | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6354299 | Austin | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6478112 | Lee | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6488118 | Corriveau | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6571912 | Soll | Jun 2003 | B2 |
20020179368 | Evangelista | Dec 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0090160 | Oct 1983 | EP |
0090160 | May 1984 | EP |
2241478 | Sep 1991 | GB |
2256408 | Dec 1992 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080023267 A1 | Jan 2008 | US |