This invention relates to a ring binder mechanism having pronged metal anchors for attaching the mechanism to a binder.
A typical ring binder mechanism has plural pairs of moveable ring halves supported by a sheet metal housing. A pair of eyelets, whose upper ends are riveted in holes of the housing, extend downward from the housing. To secure the ring mechanism to a loose-leaf binder, two external rivets are inserted through the eyelets of the housing from the outside of the binder by a riveter.
It is unpleasant to see exposed rivet heads on a closed binder. Moreover, if the ring mechanism is riveted to a clear vinyl overlay binder, the rivet heads usually cause resistance to the labeling sheet when it is inserted into the clear vinyl pocket. Some prior constructions hide the rivet head inside a closed binder and require no external rivet when securing the ring binder mechanism onto a binder.
One known way to secure ring mechanisms to a notebook spine is, rather than using through rivets, to use pronged anchors which penetrate the spine only partly, and do not show from the outside of the notebook. But these anchors do not always provide enough retention force, even though they may be pressed against the spine with a large application force.
To maximize the resistance to detachment of the ring mechanism from the binder, the principle is to spread the prongs as wide as possible. As the prongs spread, the total horizontal area covered by the prongs inside the chipboard increases. When a pullout force is applied, tending to shear the chipboard above the prongs along a shearing boundary, it is resisted by a shearing reaction force at that boundary. The maximum reaction force that the chipboard can produce is directly proportional to the length of the boundary traced by the sharp points of prongs, the shear strength of the chipboard, and the thickness of the chipboard.
The primary objective of the invention is to hide the rivet head and to simplify the process of securing the ring mechanism to a typical binder.
A related goal is to construct an anchor that can penetrate the chipboard of the binder when the eyelets are pressed towards the chipboard, while minimizing the required pressing force.
A further object is to maximize the retention force of such an anchor.
The above objectives are attained by a ring binder mechanism having pronged metal anchors, as described in the following description.
Since, with this invention, the prongs are submerged in the chipboard, no additional rivet is needed to fix the ring mechanism with the pronged anchor to the chipboard. And because neither a rivet head nor a pronged metal anchor shows from the outside of a closed binder, the appearance of the binder is enhanced, and there is no resistance to insertion of the title sheet when using a clear vinyl overlay binder.
The present construction minimizes the force needed to secure the ring mechanism to the binder and maximizes the force required to detach it. The force required to secure the ring mechanism affects to the cost of the manufacturing process; the force required to remove the ring mechanism from the binder determines the security of the loose leaf papers holding in the binder.
In the accompanying drawings,
According to this invention, a pronged anchor 10 is formed by stamping a small metal plate into the shape shown in
Each of the prongs has lateral sides 18 which subtend an angle 45° (
The prongs are given a slight outward curvature (with a radius of curvature of about 4.6 mm). They are bent downward during manufacture, as shown in
The prong plates are pre-assembled to a ring binder mechanism 30 (
The open-ended rivet 50 shown in
To secure the assembled ring mechanism to the chipboard of the binder, force is applied to the base flat of each eyelet with a punch-like tool 60 (
The circular prongs stab into the layer of the chipboard at an attack angle of 45°. Thus half of the vertical pressing force is used to penetrate the chipboard, and half of the force transfers to the horizontal direction to flatten the prongs as they penetrate the chipboard. The prong tips penetrate the chipboard easily, achieving the goal of minimizing the force needed to secure the ring mechanism properly. Once the prongs have penetrated the surface of the chipboard, they begin to spread and are bent upward by the contact reaction force as they submerge into the chipboard.
As the prongs spread, the reaction forces—which always act perpendicular to the surface of the prongs—change direction. The tips of the prongs follow an arcuate path, corresponding to their own curvature, within the chipboard. The prongs never resurface. As a result, no portion of the prongs shows from outside the binder.
The stepped structure of the cross section of the pronged metal provides sufficient structural stiffness for transmitting the bending moments M1 and M2, where M1=M2=P*d, as illustrated in
To test the security of pronged anchors according to this invention, a quantity of pronged anchors were applied to 120 point (3 mm thick) chipboards, and then were pulled off the chipboards while the pulling force was measured. The pulling forces ranged from a minimum of 24 kg to a maximum of 34 kg, the average being 29 kg. Even the minimum retention force observed is more than adequate to securely retain a ring mechanism to its binder.
Since the invention is subject to many variations and changes in detail, it is intended that the foregoing description and the drawings, including any linear or angular dimensions recited, shall be interpreted as merely illustrative of the invention defined by the claims below.