This invention relates to binders for holding loose leaf pages, and in particular to an improved mechanism for opening and closing binders.
A ring binder retains loose leaf pages, such as hole-punched papers, in a file or notebook. It features ring members for retaining the papers which may be selectively opened to add or remove papers, or closed to retain papers while allowing them to be moved along the ring members. Levers are typically provided on both ends of the binder for moving the ring members between the open and closed positions.
One drawback to ring binders of the prior art is that when ring members are being closed, they snap shut with a strong magnitude of force which can cause injury. When ring members are fully closed, that strong clamping force is necessary to securely lock the binder and prevent its unintentional opening. Unfortunately, that magnitude of force is also applied to the ring members while they are being opened or closed, causing difficulty in opening and closing the ring members, as well as the hazardous snapping action. Further, the clamping force within each ring is not uniform with the clamping force in other rings, causing uneven movement and potentially resulting in gaps on closed rings.
Another drawback to ring binders of the prior art is that mounting posts securing the binder to a cover often interfere with operation of components of the binder. For example, some binders have control slides operatively connected to levers for movement of the control slide lengthwise of the binder to open and close ring members. The control slides, however, must be specially formed to receive the mounting post through the control slides in order to operate. Manufacturing ring binders with these control slides can be time consuming and costly.
Accordingly, it would be beneficial to provide a ring binder in which a control slide is operatively connected to a lever by a connector capable of transmitting force from the lever to the control slide around a mounting post without requiring the control slide to be specially formed to receive the mounting post.
A ring binder mechanism has an elongate plate having a longitudinal axis. Hinge plates are supported by the plate for pivoting motion relative to the elongate plate. The mechanism has rings that include ring members moveable by the hinge plates between a closed position wherein the ring members of each ring form a substantially continuous, closed loop, and an open position wherein the ring members of each ring form a discontinuous, open loop. A travel bar is supported for movement in translation relative to the elongate plate and operatively connected to the hinge plates for moving the ring members between the closed and open positions. Pivoting movement of the hinge plates from the closed position to the open position is blocked when the travel bar is in the closed position. A spring is arranged to bias the travel bar toward the closed position.
Another aspect of the invention is a ring binder mechanism having an elongate plate. The elongate plate has a longitudinal axis and two generally opposite longitudinal edges. Hinge plates are supported by the plate between the two edges for pivoting motion relative to the elongate plate. The mechanism has rings that include ring members moveable by the hinge plates between a closed position wherein the ring members of each ring form a substantially continuous, closed loop, and an open position wherein the ring members of each ring form a discontinuous, open loop. A control structure is supported by the elongate plate for movement relative to the elongate plate for controllably pivoting the hinge plates to thereby move the ring members between the closed and open positions. The control structure includes a travel bar operatively connected to the hinge plates and movable in translation relative to the elongate plate for moving the hinge plates between the closed and open positions. A spring is arranged to bias the travel bar toward the closed position for locking the hinge plates in the closed position.
Still another aspect of the invention is a ring binder mechanism. The mechanism has an elongate plate having a longitudinal axis and two generally opposite longitudinal edges. Hinge plates are supported by the plate between the two edges for pivoting motion relative to the elongate plate. The mechanism has rings including ring members moveable by the hinge plates between a closed position wherein the ring members of each ring form a substantially continuous, closed loop, and an open position wherein the ring members of each ring form a discontinuous, open loop. A control structure is supported by the elongate plate for movement relative to the elongate plate for controllably pivoting the hinge plates to thereby move the ring members between the closed and open positions. The control structure includes a travel bar operatively connected to the hinge plates and movable in translation relative to the elongate plate for moving the hinge plates between the closed and open positions. The control structure also includes an actuating lever. The lever is operatively connected to the travel bar such that pivoting motion of the lever produces movement of the travel bar generally lengthwise of the elongate plate. The control structure is adapted to block pivoting movement of the hinge plates to open the rings when the ring members are in the closed position. A spring is arranged to bias the travel bar toward the closed position.
Other objects and features of the present invention will be in part apparent and in part pointed out hereinafter.
Corresponding reference characters indicate corresponding parts throughout the views of the drawings.
Referring now to the drawings and in particular to
The plate 32 is shaped as an elongated rectangle with a uniform, generally arch-shaped elevated profile having at its center a raised plateau 36. The plate 32 has a longitudinal axis 38, two generally opposite longitudinal edges 40, and two generally opposite transverse ends 42. A bent under rim 44 (
Each of the three rings 34 include two half ring members 54 which are movable between a closed position (
The ring members 54 are mounted on hinge plates 56 (
A unique control structure indicated generally at 66 is provided for controllably pivoting the hinge plates 56 and thereby moving the ring members 54 between the closed and open positions, as well as for controllably locking the ring members at the closed position. The control structure 66 includes a single actuating lever 68 at one end of the mechanism, a travel bar 70, and two connecting links 72 which are supported by the elongate plate 32 and are movable relative to the elongate plate. The connecting links 72 operatively connect the travel bar 70 to the hinge plates 56.
The actuating lever 68 selectively moves the ring members 54 between the open and closed positions and moves the mechanism to a locked position. The lever 68 is pivotally mounted by a hinge pin 74 to one end 42 of the elongate plate 32 in a position readily accessible for grasping and moving the lever. The opposite end 42 of the elongate plate is free from any actuator, although it is understood that a mechanism with two levers does not depart from the scope of this invention. The lever 68 is operatively connected to the travel bar 70 such that application of force to the lever produces movement of the travel bar generally lengthwise of the elongate plate 32. The pivotal motion of the lever 68 provides for easier application of force by an operator when moving the travel bar 70 than it would be to translate the bar directly as by pushing or pulling, and does so without the bar protruding from the elongate plate. A suitable rigid material or combination of materials, such as metal or plastic, forms the lever 68.
An intermediate connector 76 is pivotally connected to the lever 68 and to the travel bar 70 for pivoting motion relative to both the lever and travel bar. Force is transmitted from the lever 68 to the travel bar 70 through the intermediate connector 76. The intermediate connector 76 has an elongate slot 78 for allowing the intermediate connector to move while receiving a mounting post 48 through the slot. The slot 78 allows transmission of force around the post 48 while keeping direction of force along a centerline of the intermediate connector 76. The intermediate connector 76 has a tabbed end 80 for being received in a slot 82 on an end of the travel bar 70 for permitting relative pivoting motion. A hinge pin 84 attaches the intermediate connector 76 to the lever 68.
The travel bar 70 (
Two mounts, indicated generally at 90, are on the travel bar 70 for pivotally attaching the travel bar and connecting links 72. Each mount 90 includes stops 92, 94 (
Referring to
Locating arms 108 extend laterally outwardly from opposite sides of the connecting link 72 for extending through the locating cutouts 64 in the hinge plates 56. The arms 108 attach the link 72 to the hinge plates 56 and locate the link against canting movement, that is, movement about a vertical axis perpendicular to the longitudinal axis 38 of the elongate plate 32. However, ends of the arms 108 are received sufficiently loosely in the locating cutouts 64 so as not to interfere with the pivoting motion of the connecting link 72.
Preferably, the connecting links 72 are formed of a suitable rigid material, such as metal or plastic. It is understood that mechanisms with links formed of a non-rigid material do not depart from the scope of this invention. Further, a mechanism having a different number of connecting links (i.e., greater or less than two) does not depart from the scope of this invention.
The connecting links 72 are at spaced apart locations and positioned longitudinally relative to the rings 34 such that force applied through the lever 68 is distributed generally uniformly among the rings. In the embodiment of
The components of the mechanism 30 are made of a suitable rigid material, such as a metal (e.g., steel). Mechanisms made of non-metallic materials, specifically including a plastic, do not depart from the scope of this invention.
In operation, the control structure 66 is configured to selectively place the mechanism 30 at three primary positions:
First position: Ring members 54 open (
Second position: Ring members 54 closed and unlocked (
Third position: Ring members 54 closed and locked (
In order to move from the first position to the second and third, an operator applies force to the lever 68 to progressively pivot the lever upwardly. That pulls the intermediate connector 76 and travel bar 70 such that they move toward the end 42 of the elongate plate 32 having the lever. As the travel bar 70 moves, both connecting links 72 are simultaneously and pivotally moved to a more upright position. For instance, typical angles A (
The angle of the connecting links 72 in turn controls the position of the hinge plates 56. When closing the ring members 54, the lugs 102 on the connecting links engage the upper surfaces of the hinge plates 56, pushing them downward to pivot the hinge plates and thereby close the ring members. Conversely, when opening the ring members 54, the tabs 104 of the connecting links engage the lower surfaces of the hinge plates 56 to pivot the hinge plates in the opposite direction.
At the second, unlocked position, any force which tends to open the ring members 54 is not opposed. Because the hinge plates 56 receive substantially no tension from the elongate plate 32, a light finger pressure on the ring members is sufficient to move the ring members 54 to the first, open position, or back to the second, closed and unlocked position. Such force needs only overcome internal friction of the mechanism and the small spring force biasing the hinge plates 56 away from a co-planer position. There is no strong snapping motion as on conventional mechanisms. The force pivots the hinge plates 56, pushing up on the lugs 102 of the connecting links 72, and thereby pivoting the links to a different angle A.
A strong clamping force is not being applied while the ring members 54 in the rings 34 move between the first (open) and second (closed and unlocked) positions. Unlike binders of the prior art, the elongate plate 32 does not provide significant tension to the hinge plates and rings. Accordingly, the force is relatively less when the ring members are moving. That permits the ring members to be easily opened or closed using less strength by an operator. It also inhibits injury should the operator inadvertently place a finger or hand in position between ring members 54 while they are being clamped together.
When the connecting links 72 reach an angle A of 90 degrees (not shown), which is between the second and third positions and substantially closer to the third position, the mechanism 30 is at a critical locked position. As shown in
As shown in
One method according to the present invention opens or closes the ring binder mechanism 30 having ring members 54. The method comprises the steps of mounting the ring members 54 on pivotable hinge plates 56 such that pivoting of the hinge plates moves the ring members between open and closed positions. The hinge plates 56 are operatively connected with the travel bar 70 by placing at least one pivotally movable connecting link 72 between the hinge plates and the bar such that motion of the bar produces pivotal motion of the hinge plates. Force is applied to the travel bar 70 to move the bar, thereby pivoting the connecting links 72 to open or close the ring members 54. A step of locking the mechanism 30 includes applying force to the travel bar 70 to move the bar and thereby pivot the connecting links 72 to incline the connecting links to at least the critical locked position (angle A of 90 degrees or greater) wherein opening of ring members is inhibited.
The binder mechanism 30 of the present invention effectively retains loose leaf pages. The mechanism does not snap shut with a strong force which might injure a person who inadvertently places a finger or hand between ring members as they clamp together. The ring members 54 may be moved by application of force at only one end 42 of the elongate plate, and the magnitude of force is less than on ring binders of the prior art. The mechanism distributes force generally uniformly to the three rings 34. The binder may be controllably placed in a locked position for securing loose leaf sheets.
A second embodiment of the ring binder mechanism of the present invention, generally indicated 130, is shown in
As shown in
In operation, the control structure 132 is configured to allow the same lengthwise movement of the travel bar 140 and the same pivotal movement of the connecting links 72 as in the previous embodiment. However, the mechanism 130 is configured to move directly from the first position (ring members 54 open) shown in
A third embodiment 220 of the present invention is shown in
A fourth embodiment 230 of the present invention is shown in
In view of the above, it will be seen that the several objects of the invention are achieved and other advantageous results obtained.
When introducing elements of the present invention, the articles “a”, “an”, “the” and “said” are intended to mean that there are one or more of the elements. The terms “comprising”, “including” and “having” are intended to be inclusive and mean that there may be additional elements other than the listed elements.
As various changes could be made in the above without departing from the scope of the invention, it is intended that all matter contained in the above description and shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/140,728, filed May 31, 2005, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/323,052, filed Dec. 18, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,296,946, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/683,205, filed Nov. 30, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,749,357, the entire disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
566717 | Krah | Aug 1896 | A |
651254 | Krah | Jun 1900 | A |
683019 | Buchanan | Sep 1901 | A |
790382 | McBride | May 1905 | A |
854074 | Bryant | May 1907 | A |
857377 | Baker | Jun 1907 | A |
974831 | Scherzinger | Nov 1910 | A |
1011391 | Sturgis | Dec 1911 | A |
1163179 | Schade, Jr. | Dec 1915 | A |
1168260 | Albrecht | Jan 1916 | A |
1398034 | Mero | Nov 1921 | A |
1398388 | Murphy | Nov 1921 | A |
1733548 | Martin | Oct 1929 | A |
1733894 | Martin | Oct 1929 | A |
1787957 | Schade | Jan 1931 | A |
1822669 | Schade | Sep 1931 | A |
1857291 | Trussell | May 1932 | A |
1953981 | Trussell | Apr 1934 | A |
1991362 | Krag | Feb 1935 | A |
1996463 | Dawson et al. | Apr 1935 | A |
2004570 | Dawson | Jun 1935 | A |
2013416 | McClure | Sep 1935 | A |
2024461 | Lotter | Dec 1935 | A |
2067846 | Cooper | Jan 1937 | A |
2075766 | Rand | Mar 1937 | A |
2089211 | Krag | Aug 1937 | A |
2096944 | Unger et al. | Oct 1937 | A |
2103307 | Unger | Dec 1937 | A |
2105235 | Schade | Jan 1938 | A |
2158056 | Cruzan | May 1939 | A |
2179627 | Handler | Nov 1939 | A |
2204918 | Trussell | Jun 1940 | A |
2218105 | Griffin | Oct 1940 | A |
2236321 | Ostrander | Mar 1941 | A |
2239062 | Tallmadge | Apr 1941 | A |
2239121 | St. Louis et al. | Apr 1941 | A |
2251878 | Hanna et al. | Aug 1941 | A |
2252422 | Unger | Aug 1941 | A |
2260929 | Bloore | Oct 1941 | A |
2288189 | Guinane | Jun 1942 | A |
2304716 | Supin | Dec 1942 | A |
2311492 | Unger | Feb 1943 | A |
2322595 | Schade | Jun 1943 | A |
2338011 | Schade | Dec 1943 | A |
2421799 | Martin | Jun 1947 | A |
2528866 | Dawson, Jr. | Nov 1950 | A |
2543866 | Panfil, Sr. | Mar 1951 | A |
2552076 | Wedge | May 1951 | A |
2612169 | Segal | Sep 1952 | A |
2789561 | Bonn et al. | Apr 1957 | A |
2865377 | Schroer et al. | Dec 1958 | A |
2871711 | Stark | Feb 1959 | A |
2891553 | Acton | Jun 1959 | A |
2894513 | Gempe et al. | Jul 1959 | A |
3077888 | Thieme | Feb 1963 | A |
3098489 | Vernon | Jul 1963 | A |
3098490 | Wance | Jul 1963 | A |
3104667 | Mintz | Sep 1963 | A |
3149636 | Rankin | Sep 1964 | A |
3190293 | Schneider et al. | Jun 1965 | A |
3205894 | Rankin | Sep 1965 | A |
3205895 | Johnson | Sep 1965 | A |
3255759 | Dennis | Jun 1966 | A |
3348550 | Wolf et al. | Oct 1967 | A |
3718402 | Schade | Feb 1973 | A |
3748051 | Frank | Jul 1973 | A |
3884586 | Michaelis et al. | May 1975 | A |
3954343 | Thomsen | May 1976 | A |
3993374 | Schudy et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4127340 | Almgren | Nov 1978 | A |
4130368 | Jacoby et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
4222679 | Luogameno | Sep 1980 | A |
4352582 | Eliasson | Oct 1982 | A |
4486112 | Cummins | Dec 1984 | A |
4522526 | Lozfau et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4566817 | Barrett, Jr. | Jan 1986 | A |
4571108 | Vogl | Feb 1986 | A |
4696595 | Pinkney | Sep 1987 | A |
4798491 | Lassle | Jan 1989 | A |
4813803 | Gross | Mar 1989 | A |
4815882 | Ohminato | Mar 1989 | A |
4886390 | Silence et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4919557 | Podosek | Apr 1990 | A |
5067840 | Cooper et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5116157 | Gillum et al. | May 1992 | A |
5180247 | Yu | Jan 1993 | A |
5255991 | Sparkes | Oct 1993 | A |
5286128 | Gillum | Feb 1994 | A |
5332327 | Gillum | Jul 1994 | A |
5346325 | Yamanoi | Sep 1994 | A |
5354142 | Yu | Oct 1994 | A |
5368407 | Law | Nov 1994 | A |
5378073 | Law | Jan 1995 | A |
5393155 | Ng | Feb 1995 | A |
5393156 | Mullin et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5476335 | Whaley | Dec 1995 | A |
5524997 | von Rohrscheidt | Jun 1996 | A |
5577852 | To | Nov 1996 | A |
5651628 | Bankes et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5660490 | Warrington | Aug 1997 | A |
5692847 | Zane et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5692848 | Wada | Dec 1997 | A |
5718529 | Chan | Feb 1998 | A |
5782569 | Mullin et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5788392 | Cheung | Aug 1998 | A |
5807006 | Cheung | Sep 1998 | A |
5810499 | Law | Sep 1998 | A |
5816729 | Whaley | Oct 1998 | A |
5836709 | Cheung | Nov 1998 | A |
5868513 | Law | Feb 1999 | A |
5879097 | Cheng | Mar 1999 | A |
5882135 | Ko | Mar 1999 | A |
5895164 | Wu | Apr 1999 | A |
5924811 | To et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5957611 | Whaley | Sep 1999 | A |
5975785 | Chan | Nov 1999 | A |
6036394 | Cheng | Mar 2000 | A |
6142697 | Williams | Nov 2000 | A |
6146042 | To et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6155737 | Whaley | Dec 2000 | A |
6203229 | Coerver | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206601 | Ko | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6217247 | Ng | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6270279 | Whaley | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6276862 | Snyder et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6293722 | Holbrook et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6364558 | To | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371678 | Chizmar | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6467984 | To | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6474897 | To | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6533486 | To | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6749357 | Cheng | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6758621 | To | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6821045 | Whaley | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6840695 | Horn | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6916134 | Wong | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7223040 | Koike et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7275886 | Cheng | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7296946 | Cheng et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7404685 | Cheng | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7478963 | Tanaka et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7524128 | Cheng | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7534064 | Cheng | May 2009 | B2 |
7549817 | Cheng et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7661898 | Ng et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7661899 | Lin | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7665926 | Cheng | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7674062 | Horn | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7748922 | Cheng | Jul 2010 | B2 |
20030044221 | To et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20050201818 | Cheng | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050207826 | Cheng et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060008318 | Ng | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060056906 | Horn | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060147254 | Cheng | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060251467 | Cheng | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070086836 | Cheng | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080075527 | Pi et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1431065 | Jun 2004 | EP |
1336765 | Sep 1963 | FR |
1346864 | Dec 1963 | FR |
2221924 | Oct 1974 | FR |
2238332 | Feb 1975 | FR |
868724 | May 1961 | GB |
906279 | Sep 1962 | GB |
952536 | Mar 1964 | GB |
2275023 | Aug 1994 | GB |
2292343 | Feb 1996 | GB |
2387815 | Oct 2003 | GB |
5979379 | May 1984 | JP |
6118880 | Feb 1986 | JP |
1299095 | Dec 1989 | JP |
2034289 | Mar 1990 | JP |
4120085 | Oct 1992 | JP |
10217662 | Aug 1998 | JP |
2004098417 | Apr 2004 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Kokuyo Lock Ring Mechanism with description, two instruction sheets, and nine photographs, undated but admitted as prior art, 12 pgs. |
Office Action dated Mar. 3, 2008 from related U.S. Appl. No. 11/140,728, 12 pgs. |
Response filed Jun. 3, 2008 to Office Action dated Mar. 3, 2008 from related U.S. Appl. No. 11/140,728, 15 pgs. |
Office action dated Sep. 10, 2008 from related U.S. Appl. No. 11/140,728, 8 pgs. |
Response filed Jan. 8, 2009 to Office Action dated Sep. 10, 2008 from related U.S. Appl. No. 11/140,728, 12 pgs. |
Office action dated Mar. 31, 2009 from related U.S. Appl. No. 11/140,728, 13 pgs. |
Response filed Jun. 22, 2009 to Office action dated Mar. 31, 2009 in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/140,728, 14 pgs. |
Office action dated Sep. 29, 2009 from related U.S. Appl. No. 11/140,728, 16 pgs. |
Appeal Brief filed Mar. 26, 2010 in response to Office action issued Sep. 29, 2009 in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/140,728, 29 pgs. |
Office Action dated Nov. 23, 2007 from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/870,801, 12 pgs. |
Response filed Jan. 28, 2008 to Office Action dated Nov. 23, 2007 from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/870,801, 10 pgs. |
Office Action dated Jun. 13, 2008 from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/870,801, 10 pgs. |
Response filed Sep. 9, 2008 to Office Action dated Jun. 13, 2008 from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/870,801, 10 pgs. |
Advisory Action dated Oct. 9, 2008 from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/870,801, 3 pgs. |
Response filed Oct. 14, 2008 to Advisory Action dated Oct. 9, 2008 from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/870,801, 3 pgs. |
Office action issued Mar. 23, 2009 in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/954,990, 11 pgs. |
Response filed Jul. 23, 2009 to Office Action dated Mar. 23, 2009 from related U.S. Appl. No. 11/954,990. 11 pgs. |
Office action issued Nov. 23, 2009 in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/954,990, 11 pgs. |
Office action issued Jun. 24, 2009 in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/256,229; 10 pgs. |
Response filed Oct. 26, 2009 to Office Action dated Jun. 25, 2009 from related U.S. Appl. No. 12/256,229; 13 pgs. |
Office action issued Nov. 23, 2009 in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/256,229, 13 pgs. |
Response filed Mar. 19, 2010 to Office Action dated Nov. 23, 2009 from related U.S. Appl. No. 12/256,229. 8 pgs. |
Third Party Submission filed Apr. 3, 2009 in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/256,229; 4 pgs. |
European Search Report regarding related application serial No. EP 05011914.8 dated Dec. 27, 2007, 4 pgs. |
“Joint Memorandum in Support of Motion for Claim Construction by the Court Regarding U.S. Patent No. 7,404,685” from litigation concerning related U.S. Patent 7,404,685, filed Sep. 17, 2008. 517 pages. |
“Defendant U.S. Ring Binder, L.P.'s Response to Plaintiff's Proposed Claim Constructions Regarding U.S. Patent No. 7,404,685” from litigation concerning related U.S. Patent 7,404,685, filed Oct. 3, 2008. 26 pages. |
“Plaintiff World Wide Stationery Manufacturing Co. Ltd.'s Response to Defendant's Proposed Claim Construction of U.S. Patent No. 7,404,685” from litigation concerning related U.S. Patent 7,404,685, filed Oct. 3 2008. 123 pages. |
“Markman Hearing Transcript” [transcript of “Markman Hearing”] from litigation concerning related U.S. Patent 7,404,685, dated Nov. 4, 2008. 148 pages. |
“Plaintiff's Post-Hearing Claim Construction Brief” from litigation concerning related U.S. Patent 7,404,685, filed Nov. 25, 2008. 640 pages. |
“Defendant U.S. Ring Binder, L.P.'s Supplemental Brief Regarding Claim Construction” from litigation concerning related U.S. Patent 7,404,685, filed Nov. 25, 2008. 177 pages. |
“List of Disputed and Non-Disputed Claim Terms” from litigation concerning related U.S. Patent 7,404,685, filed Nov. 25, 2008. 3 pages. |
“Opening Expert Report of Dr. Virgil J. Flanigan” from litigation concerning related U.S. Patent 7,404,685, dated Feb. 13, 2009. 175 pages. |
“Expert Witness Report of Jeffrey K. Ball, Ph.D., P.E.” from litigation concerning related U.S. Patent 7,404,685, dated Feb. 13, 2009. 166 pages. |
“Defendant U.S. Ring Binder LP's Motion, Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, and Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,296,946” from litigation concerning related U.S. Patent 7,404,685, filed Mar. 5, 2009. 95 pages. |
“Memorandum and Order” from litigation concerning related U.S. Patent 7,404,685, filed Mar. 31, 2009. 39 pages. |
“Supplemental Report of Jeffrey K. Ball, Ph.D., P.E.” from litigation concerning related U.S. Patent 7,404,685, dated Apr. 19, 2009. 6 pages. |
“Expert Witness Report of Jeffrey K. Ball, Ph.D., P.E.” from litigation concerning related U.S. Patent 7,404,685, dated Apr. 10, 2009. 53 pages. |
“Defendant's Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringment of U.S. Patent No. 7,296,946 and U.S. Patent No. 7,404,685” from litigation concerning related U.S. Patent 7,404,685, filed Apr. 14, 2009. 176 pages. |
“Statement of Uncontroverted Material Facts in Support of Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the Issue of Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,404,685” from litigation concerning related U.S. Patent 7,404,685, filed Apr. 14, 2009. 126 pages. |
“Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,296,946 and Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 7,296,946 Based on Improper Inventorship” from litigation concerning related U.S. Patent 7,404,685, filed Apr. 14, 2009. 2 pages. |
“Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the Issue of Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,404,685” from litigation concerning related U.S. Patent 7,404,685, filed Apr. 14, 2009. 3 pages. |
“Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the Issue of Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,404,685” from litigation concerning related U.S. Patent 7,404,685, filed Apr. 14, 2009. 14 pages. |
“Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Statement of Undisputed Material Facts in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,296,946 and Plaintiff's Statement of Additional Material Facts” from litigation concerning related U.S. Patent 7,404,685, filed Apr. 20, 2009. 9 pages. |
“Supplemental Report of Jeffrey K. Ball, Ph.D., P.E.” from litigation concerning related U.S. Patent 7,404,685, dated Apr. 20, 2009, 6 pages. |
“Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the Issue of Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,404,685” from litigation concerning related U.S. Patent 7,404,685, filed Apr. 20, 2009. 18 pages. |
“Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7.296,946” from litigation concerning related U.S. Patent 7,404,685, filed Apr. 20, 2009. 5 pages. |
“Supplemental Expert Report of Dr. Virgil J. Flanigan” from litigation concerning related U.S. Patent 7,404,685, dated Apr. 23, 2009. 19 pages. |
“U.S. Ring Binder LP's Reply Brief in Support of Its Motions for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,296,946 and U.S. Patent No. 7,404,685” from litigation concerning related U.S. Patent 7,404,685, filed Apr. 27, 2009. 4 pages. |
“Reply Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the Issue of Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,404,685” from litigation concerning related U.S. Patent 7,404,685, filed Apr. 27, 2009. 10 pages. |
“Rebuttal Report of Dr. Virgil J. Flanigan in Response to the Expert Report, Declaration and Supplemental Report of Jeffrey K. Ball” from litigation concerning related U.S. Patent 7,404,685, dated May 1, 2009. 10 pages. |
“Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's Claim Construction Ruling” from litigation concerning related U.S. Patent 7,404,685, filed Jul. 13, 2009. 16 pages. |
“Amended Memorandum and Order” from litigation concerning related U.S. Patent 7,404,685, filed Sep. 14, 2009. 33 pages. |
“Expert Witness Report on Invalidity of Jeffrey K. Ball, Ph.D., P.E.” from U.S. Ring Binder, L.P. v. Staples the Office Superstore LLC, et al., dated Sep. 29. 2009. 39 pages. |
“Verdict Form”—from litigation concerning related U.S. Patent 7,404,685, 18 pages. Document 328. Filed Jan. 29, 2010. |
“Brief of Plaintiff-Appellant”—U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fed Cir, Case No. 2010-1358, -1359 (concerning related U.S. Patent 7,404,685), 175 pages. Filed Aug. 2, 2010. |
“Brief of Defendant-Cross Appellant U.S. Ring Binder, L.P.”—U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fed Cir, Case No. 2010-1358, -1359 (concerning related U.S. Patent 7,404,685), 172 pages. Filed Sep. 16, 2010. |
“Reply Brief of Plaintiff-Appellant World Wide Stationery Manufacturing Co., Ltd.”—U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fed Cir, Case No. 2010-1358, -1359 (concerning related U.S. Patent 7,404,685), 69 pages. Filed Oct. 29, 2010. |
“Reply Brief of Cross Appellant U.S. Ring Binder, L.P.”—U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fed Cir, Case No. 2010-1358, -1359 (concerning related U.S. Patent 7,404,685), 16 pages. Filed Nov. 15, 2010. |
“Notice of Entry of Judgment Without Opinion”, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fed Cir, Case No. 2010-1358, -1359 (concerning related U.S. Patent 7,404,685), 4 pages. Document 392, Filed May 9, 2011. |
Office action dated Mar. 25, 2011 from related U.S. Appl. No. 13/008,150. 6 pgs. |
Response filed Jun. 27, 2011 to Office Action dated Mar. 25, 2011 from related U.S. Appl. No. 13/008,150. 2 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110085846 A1 | Apr 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11140728 | May 2005 | US |
Child | 12973655 | US | |
Parent | 10323052 | Dec 2002 | US |
Child | 11140728 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09683205 | Nov 2001 | US |
Child | 10323052 | US |