The present disclosure relates generally to systems, apparatus, methods and the like for detecting vehicles such as motor vehicles and the like, and processing data collected in connection with such detection. More specifically, the present disclosure relates generally to systems, apparatus, methods and the like for using collected vehicle detection data as part of larger systems—for example, a roadway incident detection and warning system; a traffic control system; a warning and/or advisory system for a roadway or the like; a construction zone traffic control and warning system; and other similar systems.
Roadway incident detection systems have been an active research topic for some time. State highway departments and the like traditionally relied on police patrols to detect roadway incidents. Occasionally, roadside emergency call boxes were used to report incidents. Also, citizens band (CB) radio channels were established for reporting incidents. Loop detectors also have been used since the 1960s to monitor selected roadways (e.g., arterials, highways and the like). An incident detection process/algorithm using loop data may indicate a probable roadway/highway anomaly when an incident occurs. The equipment, installation and maintenance costs of inductive loop detectors prohibit their deployment in the density required for timely roadway incident detection. Driver-based (i.e., driver-reliant) incident detection systems, through CB radio, cell phones and other means of driver-initiated communication for example, when used, have been successful and timely in reporting incidents, but they are limited by the willingness of drivers to supply data, the accuracy of reported information, and the availability of appropriate communication resources. Some commercially available solutions have included video-based detection systems, which interface with closed circuit television (CCTV) video streams to detect changes in traffic flow. These systems are not very effective in detecting different levels of roadway congestion and are severely limited in some weather conditions (which is the time when many roadway incidents occur). In addition, the installation and data collection costs for widespread highway deployment are prohibitive. Necessary infrastructure to support these systems is not available for most rural roadways and installation costs generally prohibit use of these systems in “temporary” settings. Most prior sensing technologies available for roadway incident detection have included one or more of the following technologies: flux gate magnetometers magnetic sensors (for traffic flow parameter measurement), inductive loops/search coils magnetic detectors (for traffic-actuated signal control or signal counting), infrared, acoustic detection, ultrasonic detection, video detection, microwave radar detection, laser radar detection. Despite this assortment of technologies, alone or in combination, they have tended to fall short in one or more of the following: reliability, real time performance, accuracy, inclement weather performance, cost.
Systems, apparatus, methods, techniques, etc. that provide efficient, low-cost, reliable incident detection performance in a wide variety of settings and physical, weather and/or environmental conditions would represent a significant advancement in the art. It would be a further advancement to have such detection systems interface and interact with and/or be a subsystem within a variety of larger systems that allow for control, warning, informational and other interaction with vehicles and their operators.
Embodiments of roadway detection systems, apparatus, methods, techniques, etc. provide power efficient, modular sensor devices utilizing magnetic sensor elements, wireless data communication, and sensor device level processing to detect and classify roadway vehicles. Sensor devices are configured in a network enabling data sharing between sensor devices. Some apparatus and method embodiments provide for monitoring Earth-generated milliGauss fields (mGauss) within the range of each sensor element with reliability and stability over a wide range of environmental conditions and sensor device placements to detect mGauss field distortions (specifically caused by a variety of roadway vehicles) with multiple sensor devices configured as a network, communicating directly with other sensor devices to share and evaluate data to determine multiple attributes for roadway vehicle events within sensing range of the sensor device network. Other embodiments include methods of converting analog magnetic field distortion measurements to digital format and performing analysis on the detected waveform data to determine the classification of a given roadway vehicle and to determine the unique signature of the waveform event. Methods include processes to determine direction and speed of roadway vehicle movement and to distinguish between roadway lane events. Methods also include detecting standing or stationary roadway vehicles within sensor device range. Some method and apparatus embodiments transmit data wirelessly between system elements and verify the integrity and health of all system elements on a continuing time basis. Methods and systems according to some embodiments achieve real time sampling of traffic flow parameters by means of closely (or otherwise appropriately) spaced sensor devices configured as a sensing network to enable immediate recognition of significant traffic events and incidents, and immediate response thereto. Apparatus embodiments can include a substation controller and methods for configuring, evaluating condition and status, processing and relaying sensor device generated unique signature data for a defined sensor device array, controlling auxiliary devices and visual warning devices, operation and communication with adjacent substations and/or interfacing with a signal controller or central office.
The present invention will be readily understood by the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals designate like structural elements, and in which:
The following detailed description will refer to one or more embodiments, but the present invention is not limited to such embodiments. Rather, the detailed description and any embodiment(s) presented are intended only to be illustrative. Those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that the detailed description given herein with respect to the Figures is provided for explanatory purposes as the invention extends beyond these limited embodiments.
Certain terms are used throughout the description and claims to refer to particular system components. As one skilled in the art will appreciate, various companies, individuals, etc. may refer to components by different names. This disclosure does not intend to distinguish between components that differ insubstantially. Also, phrases such as “coupled to” and “connected to” and the like are used herein to describe a connection between two devices, elements and/or components and are intended to mean physically and/or electrically either coupled directly together, or coupled indirectly together, for example via one or more intervening elements or components or via a wireless connection, where appropriate. The term “system” refers broadly to a collection of two or more components and may be used to refer to an overall system (e.g., a computer system, a sensor system, a network of sensors and/or computers, etc.), a subsystem provided as part of a larger system (e.g., a subsystem within an individual computer and/or detection system, etc.), and/or a process or method pertaining to operation of such a system or subsystem.
In this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plurals unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Unless defined otherwise, technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meanings that are not inconsistent to one of ordinary skill in the art relevant to the subject matter disclosed and discussed herein. References in the specification to “embodiments,” “some embodiments,” “one embodiment,” “an embodiment,” etc. mean that a particular feature, structure or characteristic described in connection with such embodiment(s) is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. Thus, the appearances of the noted phrases appearing in various places throughout the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment. In the following detailed description, references are made to the accompanying drawings that form a part thereof, and are shown by way of illustrating specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, and it is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and that structural, logical, electrical and/or other changes can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
One or more embodiments of a roadway incident detection and warning system 100 are represented in
Temporary installations and/or implementations of one or more embodiments of the present invention can be used in such construction zones and/or in other areas where monitoring, incident detection, control, warning and/or informational functionalities can be useful on a temporary basis. Temporary construction zone sensor device arrays could include devices to detect roadway worker intrusion into the traffic zone and to provide real time visual warning to motorists of such events.
Other embodiments include wrong way traffic detection on freeway exit ramps and on any roadways equipped with this highway incident detection system. Configuration protocols for the highway incident detection system deployed on any roadway can include, at the user's option, wrong way vehicle detection. Sensor device programming includes the option of specifying direction of travel. When the sensor devices detect opposing (i.e., wrong way) traffic in a lane, the visual warning indicators can be activated to warn approaching motorists. In addition, the roadway or policing authority can be notified by substations receiving such data from roadway sensor devices. Substations so equipped can immediately deploy an airborne and/or other mobile sensor platform to provide additional data such as supplemental roadway data. Where highway incident detection system embodiments are deployed on limited access freeways, a sensor device array deployed on all access exit ramps can interface directly with special devices designed to stop the driver from entering the freeway the wrong way (e.g., flashing light arrays, sirens, barriers, etc.). If the driver continues onto the freeway into oncoming traffic the wrong way, the highway incident detection system can immediately be activated, thus warning drivers via flashing light indicators and notifying the policing and roadway authorities directly via the substation interfaces that a wrong way vehicle incident is occurring.
Several embodiments of the present invention can enhance traffic light signal operation at roadway intersections. Deployment of sensor device embodiments along arterials and intersecting streets provides data to traffic light signal controllers about traffic volume and speed on one or more of the roadway approaches to the controlled intersection. The traffic controller can use this real time data to adjust operation of the intersection's traffic signals to enable efficient traffic flows. This dynamic system can automatically adjust signal operation to actual traffic flow as it varies over time (e.g., through a day, weekend, weather condition, etc.). Consecutive controlled intersections can approximate synchronous/consecutive operation based on actual traffic flow at each intersection, automatically producing arterial synchronicity for heavy traffic. The improved efficiencies can yield substantial time and fuel savings. Facilitating a more natural traffic flow also can improve roadway safety, reducing accidents and injuries.
Other embodiments utilize placement of sensor devices on the roadway at regular intervals to provide internet data service to roadway users by routing internet data packets and other TCP/IP services. Such a system also can provide real time information to a vehicle concerning upcoming traffic and roadway conditions through wireless communication. This can include status of upcoming railroad crossings, bridge status, traffic congestion, traffic incidents, weather alerts, suggested route alternatives, etc. Some embodiments include airborne platforms equipped with one or more sensors that can include infrared detectors, radar devices, video sensors, or other appropriate sensors. The airborne platforms reside at intermediate sensor data stations in some cases, ready for immediate deployment to collect additional information when incidents are detected and to provide additional warning to motorists as required by protocols established by the roadway authority.
Installation of one or more roadway system embodiments can monitor an area of military importance including curfew zones, customs and border protection, etc. Another system embodiment can be used for providing a location radio beacon to vehicles and traffic along the roadway, thus eliminating the need for an individual Global Positioning System (GPS) unit in each vehicle and reducing the cost of location-based services.
System 100 of
At a basic level, embodiments of system 100 collect data (“information” and “data” are used interchangeably herein unless specifically noted otherwise) about motor vehicles (and/or other traffic) on an exemplary roadway 122 or the like (roadways can be virtually any configuration of any number of lanes and traffic directions; various roadway configurations will require different sensor device placements). The collected data is then processed (in the devices 112, in the substations 114 and/or in the control stations 128, for example) to generate processed data and information that is sufficient to determine status, activity, conditions, etc. on the roadway 122, or may be used as one or more inputs to one or more processing methods that yield further information about activity, conditions, etc. on roadway 122. Examples of such methods and processing are provided below. Such exemplary systems provide timely status of traffic flow parameters and immediate detection of events of interest immediately. The prompt response of such systems can include information used to regulate and/or control activities on the roadway 122, to warn motor vehicle operators of hazardous and/or other conditions on the roadway 122, to provide information to motor vehicle operators about traffic conditions, to receive information from individual vehicles that is of interest to effective traffic flow management, etc. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the use of collected (i.e., unprocessed) motor vehicle data, as well as processed data, can be used in a wide variety of applications to assist in making roadways and the like more safe, more efficient, etc.
In some embodiments a plurality of sensor devices 112 will collect data and supply the collected data to a single substation 114. Likewise, in some embodiments, a plurality of substations 114 can provide collected and/or processed data to a single control station 128, thus leveraging a large amount of collected data for use by a single control station 128 or the like. Similarly, sensor devices 112 can be grouped to provide overlapping coverage of a roadway 122 so that each sensor device 112 provides its collected data to multiple substations 114. Each substation 114 can also supply collected and/or processed data to multiple control stations 128 in an “overlapping” fashion. Similarly, multiple systems 100 can be configured to supply, collect, and/or process data from a single control station 128.
In system 100 of
During operation, the sensor element 230 generates analog waveform data representing magnetic field changes due to a vehicle or other ferrous-containing object near the sensor device. Each sensor element 230 can be a single or multi-dimensional detector. Multi-dimensional waveform data provides improved sensitivity and precision as compared to one-dimensional sensor element data.
When system 100 includes sensor devices placed between two roadway lanes, such sensor devices 112 can detect, distinguish between and classify vehicles moving within range of the sensor devices 112 in either or both directions in both lanes. As noted above,
Referring to the sensor device embodiment 212 of
Referring to
In the exemplary process illustrated in
In some embodiments, if
|Xk−
where τ1, τ2 are the thresholds derived empirically from the actual waveform data.
Once a vehicle detection event is confirmed at 74, a check can be performed as to whether a vehicle detection is already in progress. If a prior vehicle detection was not in progress, then a new vehicle detection report is opened/generated and placed in the radio outgoing data queue at 78 to share, for example, with other sensor devices 112 and/or one or more substations 114. At 80 the digitized waveform data generated by an analog-to-digital conversion in the processor 236 at 72 is used to generate a unique vehicle identification signature and/or data related to such an identification signature, used for vehicle identification and classification.
If vehicle detection is not confirmed at 74, but a vehicle detection event was in progress, then an “end of vehicle detection” report is generated and placed in the outgoing radio data queue at 88. Any data remaining in the buffer is processed to extract a vehicle ID signature at step 90. The last vehicle ID signature extracted is placed in the outgoing radio data queue at 92 to be shared with other sensor devices 112 and/or one or more substations 114.
A variety of waveform data features such as number, magnitude, steepness, and sequence of waveform peaks can be used in detection, extraction and identification processes. In general, waveform peaks can be determined by evaluating maximum and minimum variation of magnetic flux density compared to a waveform base line value that corresponds to no vehicle within range of the sensor device. Other useful (but speed dependent) waveform data features include prominent frequency characteristics identifiable by calculating a Fourier transform of the time domain waveform data and selecting the dominant frequency features. One advantage of extracting peak flux density magnitude values is that peak values do not change as vehicle speed changes. As vehicle speed changes, waveform data peaks expand or contract along the time domain while preserving their relative positions (i.e., their sequence) and magnitudes, as well as important signature details. Moreover, peak data processing and mapping substantially reduces data storage, transmission, potential matching and signature matching complexity. Time-stamped peak sequences and peak amplitude/magnitude values are calculated and stored for matching purposes. Vehicle detection and ID signatures are passed on to a traffic incident/congestion detection process at 82. Congestion and incident detection processing evaluates traffic parameters such as speed, change of speed, rate of change of speed and vehicle spacing to determine traffic congestion and to detect traffic incidents and anomalies. When traffic congestion or a traffic incident is detected, drivers can be alerted immediately at step 84 though a variety of means including in-pavement or side of road traffic warning lights 247 or via system compatible on-board motor vehicle communications devices.
Sensor device radio 240 transmits traffic incident and congestion detection results to other sensor devices 112, system substations 114, and/or to the system control station 128 for immediate comparison, evaluation and appropriate action. In some embodiments radio transmission data is organized into fixed length data frames containing a sensor device ID, packet length, and cyclic redundancy check (CRC) checksum at 86. Transmitted data may include sensor device detection reports, warning light activation/deactivation notifications, status requests to and from the control station, setup/configuration commands from substations, etc. Data received by radio 240 is processed and executed at 94. The sensor device returns to sleep mode at 96 upon completion of the logic cycle; a new logic cycle begins at 56 when the wake-up timer expires. Some embodiments may use a 64 Hz wake/sleep cycle.
The configuration and operation of a roadway detection system according to one or more embodiments is determined by sensor device placement. Sensor devices 112 can be placed either on top of the roadway surface or below its surface. Placement of sensor devices within the roadway or adjacent to the roadway can be determined by functional parameters of the system (i.e., the information to be collected and how and to whom it is distributed). The spacing/distance between sensor devices 112 in some cases is limited by effective radio range. Sensor devices 112 in some embodiments are separated by 50 to 300 feet. In other embodiments placement separation may be one foot or several yards. Sensor device separation can be a function of the design speed of the roadway, unique roadway characteristics and functional parameters of the detection system (e.g., precision necessary to analysis of travel and position, and criteria for events of interest to the system—such as direction of traffic flow, stopped vehicle identification, reverse vehicle direction, traffic flow speed changes, etc.). Roadway detection embodiments can collect or generate information pertaining to a passing vehicle such as vehicle speed, direction, length, size, magnetic signature, etc. Because analog waveform data generated by a sensor element 230 is significantly different for passenger cars, SUVs, motorcycles, trucks, semi-trucks and trailers, construction vehicles, etc., embodiments like system 100 can detect, distinguish between and identify multiple vehicles and calculate the separation between passing vehicles.
Number, placement and configuration of sensor devices or the like determine the detection zone's spatial and/or data resolution for a given embodiment. The required resolution level may depend upon the accuracy needed to determine specific events within specified time frames. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the specific parameters of a detection system layout can be based on system installation and operation requirements for a particular location. Achieving comparable data resolution for identical sensor device spacing on a 65 mph roadway compared to a 35 mph roadway is a function of sensor device clock speed. In some embodiments, the sensor device clock is an actual time clock (e.g., in “hh:mm:ss:msec & mm:dd:yyyy” format), maintained and updated through timer interrupt processes. Vehicle speed can be calculated by analyzing time-stamped vehicle detections at a plurality of sensor devices 112, which requires that individual sensor device clocks be synchronized. The synchronicity of sensor device clocks is essential to accurate speed measurement. Sensor device clock accuracy is a limiting factor of sensor spacing. A vehicle going 65 mph (95 ft/sec) travels the distance between two sensor devices 112 placed 50 feet apart in 524 milliseconds. A vehicle going 35 mph (51 ft/sec) travels the distance between two sensor devices 112 placed 50 feet apart in 974 milliseconds. Sensor device clock accuracy and synchronization of at least 100 milliseconds and 50 foot spacing provides speed estimates with 80% accuracy for 65 mph vehicles and 90% accuracy for 35 mph vehicles. Increasing sensor device clock accuracy and synchronization between sensors improves the time stamping accuracy of sensor-to-sensor speed calculations. Increasing the distance between sensor devices 112 increases the accuracy of time-stamped speed calculations proportionally. As those skilled in the art will appreciate, vehicle length, speed, size, etc. can be determined using data collected at multiple sensor device units 112 and/or considering multiple data collections at a single sensor device unit 112 (where a single sensor device unit 112 is able to collect multiple readings from a single motor vehicle as it passes the sensor device unit 112). In some embodiments, sensor devices are arrayed in a density per linear mile of the roadway to provide real time detection, monitoring, identification, control, warning, etc. of traffic and vehicles traveling on the roadway, which will depend on the normal vehicle speeds for such a roadway, as well as other possible criteria.
In some embodiments, identifying traffic congestion and incidents is accomplished through collaboration of two or more sensor devices 112. As those skilled in the art will appreciate, vehicle characteristics can include data about an individual vehicle (length, signature, average speed, etc.) as well as data collected and/or derived regarding vehicle groups on a roadway (traffic density, flow, speed changes, etc.). Data sharing between sensor devices 112 enables continuous assessment of traffic flow parameters such as traffic flow average velocity, velocity changes, rate of change, flow density, etc., as well as identifying individual vehicle velocity, velocity change, rate of change, spacing between vehicles, etc. Collaborative data collection and processing continuously applies incident detection and congestion criteria immediately to sensor device data as it is collected, enabling rapid and immediate evaluation of pertinent traffic flow parameters and appropriate system response (e.g., activating warning lights, transmitting alerts and notifications to appropriate authorities and systems).
Once an event or condition (e.g., congestion, disabled/stopped vehicle, accident, etc.) has been detected, a traffic warning and/or other action decision is made and implemented. A control station 128 can also be informed of the situation, allowing other action to be taken depending on the type and severity of the event (e.g., deploying an airborne or other mobile sensor or data collection platform, notifying law enforcement, EMS responders, a 911 operator, etc.). Warning devices can be activated in a predefined pattern (e.g., slow flashing, quickly flashing or steady red lights for an incident having a severe impact on traffic; yellow/orange lights for cautionary warnings of slower speeds, upcoming lane closures, etc.), where the warning pattern depends upon the type, urgency, severity, etc. of the incident. For example, traffic warning lights 247 can be activated in the vicinity of a detected event using radio communication between multiple sensor devices 112 and any warning devices controlled thereby. Once the traffic congestion or incident has cleared, the warning devices can be deactivated. An airborne or other mobile sensor or data collection platform 119 (a “mobile data collector”) can be deployed to send data wirelessly to the nearest control station for analysis and further distribution. In some embodiments the warning devices can also be remotely controlled by the control station 128.
Vehicle speed can be calculated on the basis of elapsed time between vehicle detections for two or more sensor devices 112 on a roadway. The sensor devices can be consecutive, neighboring, various pairs or other groupings selected to provide average vehicle speeds over longer stretches of the roadway (e.g., data from two sensor devices spaced one mile apart can yield the average vehicle speed over that mile). Time-stamped vehicle detections at two or more sensor devices 112 can be shared wirelessly between sensor devices in some embodiments and can be used to calculate a vehicle's average speed (α) between sensor devices 112 based on the sensor devices' known separation. The speed estimate α likewise can be shared directly between sensor devices 112 using a wireless network, or via substations 114 and/or control stations 128. An average traffic flow speed (β) also can be calculated periodically or continuously at each sensor device 112 and can be updated as appropriate. The value β can be calculated as a moving average of speed a over a fixed number of past time intervals. Monitoring changes in average traffic flow speed can be useful in determining a congestion condition and/or status. The rate of change of speed (γ) and consecutive vehicle spacing (δ) can be calculated and monitored. Vehicle spacing calculations may be based on average traffic flow speed and consecutive time-stamped vehicle detections at a particular sensor device 112.
Data processing in the form of one or more traffic incident and/or congestion detection processes can operate directly on parameters such as the above-defined α, β, γ, δ calculated at each sensor device 112 (and/or on other available data/information). One exemplary process for detecting traffic incidents and/or congestion problems comprises continuously monitoring average traffic flow speed β calculated at individual sensor devices 112. When a prescribed group and/or minimum number of sensor devices 112 determine that 13 has fallen below a predefined threshold, a congestion or incident condition is satisfied. Traffic warning devices 247 can be activated immediately with a predefined flashing pattern and notification sent to substation 114 and/or control station 128. When β values exceed predefined threshold criteria at a designated number of sensor devices 112, congestion/incident condition criteria are no longer satisfied. Traffic warning lights can be turned off as soon as the congestion clears or the incident is resolved.
Some embodiments of processing for detecting traffic congestion/incidents utilize the vehicle spacing parameter δ calculated at each sensor device 112. As with the use of β in the exemplary system above, one or more predefined threshold values for δ establish the criteria that must be satisfied to initiate or terminate a traffic congestion protocol. Another exemplary traffic incident detection process can be implemented using the rate of change of speed parameter γ (e.g., in monitoring sudden changes in traffic behavior). Each sensor device 112 calculates γ based on available collected data. If the value of γ exceeds predefined traffic incident criteria (e.g., shows a significant decrease in roadway vehicle speeds in a very short time period) a traffic incident protocol may be initiated immediately to display traffic warning lights, notify roadway authorities and alert law enforcement authorities. Such processing/detection is useful in traffic incident monitoring involving multiple vehicle accidents in which a number of vehicles are disabled. A sensor device 112 detecting a stopped vehicle within its sensing range can immediately initiate roadway congestion and incident protocols. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, two or more protocols may be active at the same time and may be combined with other processes to develop useful rapid response traffic monitoring systems and the like.
Additionally, in some embodiments, sensor devices 112 are configured to reduce erroneous vehicle detections (sometimes referred to as “falsing”) due to environmental conditions, component failure or malfunction, supply voltage variations, etc. Sensor devices 112 can dynamically update or correct the “bias” value of each sensor element 230 by determining proper sensor element bias and correcting a current sensor element bias value when that current sensor element bias value deviates sufficiently from the optimal bias setting. Such dynamic bias updating maintains more accurate detection operation for each sensor element 230, thus enhancing the accuracy of collected data and any processes dependent thereon, and reducing the likelihood of false positive or false negative detections.
Bias value monitoring is important in some embodiments to compensate for sensor element bias drift due to environmental changes (e.g., temperature variation) that can induce falsing. In
Some embodiments include installation of sensor devices 112, substations 114 and control stations 128 at remote locations on, in or near a roadway. In such embodiments, an “independent” power supply is helpful (that is, a power supply that does not require connection to an outside power source and that does not require expensive or frequent replacement of the power supply), for example a battery, wind-driven generator, solar power system, piezo energy harvester or other self-sustaining (i.e., self-recharging) power technique/source. Each sensor device 112 can operate on a rechargeable battery and/or ultracapacitor, connected through a charger (e.g., a voltage regulator) to a wind-driven generator, small solar panel, piezo transducer or the like. Similarly, the substations 114 can be powered by a battery that is connected to a similar self-sustaining, self-charging power source such as a wind-driven generator, a solar panel or other energy-harvesting device.
Referring to
Substations 114 can be placed 1,500 to 5,000 feet apart in some embodiments and receive data from a given range, sub-set or other group of sensor devices 112 and warning devices 247 through the IEEE 802.15.4 interface 602. Data and service requests destined for sensor device 112 from a control station 128 can be routed through a substation 114 using the same wireless interface. DSRC interface 610 enables data exchange with roadway vehicles. Roadway vehicles (e.g., those shown in
Referring to
In service delivery node 732, console 750 can be used for test purposes, while server 752 delivers primary remote operation functionalities for control station 728 (e.g., sensor device configuration, network configuration, traffic status, warning light control, etc.). A software user interface at server 752 can support these tasks. Some of the service protocols usable at the service delivery node 732 include advisory message distribution service (enabling network users to send road sign, advisory, sensor device data management, etc. messages); probe data service (enabling distribution of sensor device data from a substation to network user subscribers); information lookup service (enabling network users to look up substation IP, location, status, etc. information); vehicular host identity protocol (enabling selected sensor devices and/or substations to maintain a data session as vehicles pass from one sensor device and/or substation detection zone to another); tolling to enable a substation to simulate a tolling transaction; and positioning service (for determining vehicle locations).
Executive network operation center 734 manages and monitors the overall system and includes server 756 and test console 754 to carry out these functions (e.g., based on network management service and identity and access management service protocols). The network management service collects, aggregates, and forwards network management data to the executive network operation center 734. Moreover, the network management service also facilitates local on-site management and troubleshooting at the service delivery node 732 as well as remote management and troubleshooting from the executive network operation center 734. Identity and access management service provides security functions on the service delivery node 732, substations, the executive network operation center 734, and external users (e.g., administrative users and network users). These security management functions can be provided using a certificate-based access control. Using such components, embodiments of control station 728 provide configuration options, firmware updates, device reprogramming, and testing options to users and also provide remote status checking, alarm notification, limited configuration and data transfer.
Embodiments of AMR sensor-based vehicle detection and roadway incident detection systems of the present invention have a number of advantages over loop detector-based systems. Loop detectors suppress fine details of vehicle signatures because they can only collect combined signatures from the three spatial axes. Loop detectors also require the use of oscillator circuits (which often require switching between oscillator frequencies to adapt to conditions for vehicle, motorcycle and bicycle detection). Loop detector power requirements necessitate access to a commercial power supply, enormous solar panel, wind mill, etc. and the wiring connections and loop sizes require extensive cabling and conduit systems within the roadway zone making them disproportionately expensive for many applications. AMR sensor elements are solid state devices that can be managed for power efficient operation and placed in small housings that can be rapidly deployed in wireless communication matrices, eliminating the need for access to commercial power and the installation of connecting cables and conduits, significantly reducing installation and maintenance issues and costs. Loop detectors provide single axis “blurred” data rather than the more precise and discriminating multiple axis waveform data generated by AMR sensor elements, which also can be generated for vehicles that are not moving. Finally, AMR sensor elements permit accurate adjustment to accommodate temperature variations and saturation issues.
Systems according to one or more embodiments of the present invention also enjoy advantages over traffic monitoring systems based on cell phone call collection, tracking, etc. Some embodiments of the present invention immediately provide more accurate, real-time information about traffic conditions on a roadway without the significant delay and reliability issues that are present in cell phone tracking solutions. Moreover, roadway incident detection and warning systems according to some embodiments of the present invention provide immediate, real time, direct traffic warnings that can be controlled automatically by the system and/or manually by the roadway authority, as well as providing direct and immediate interface to roadway traffic lights and other options for future roadway-vehicle interaction based applications.
Roadway traffic data and vehicle information from sensor devices 112 are communicated via wireless channel to substation(s) 114 and control station(s) 128. Wireless connections can be chosen from a variety of wireless protocols and frequencies (e.g., 900 MHz or 2.4 GHz). Roadway detection systems, methods, etc. herein are not limited to a specific number of sensor devices 112. Roadway detection systems, methods, etc. can encompass continuous roadway systems such as interstate highway systems for their entire length or can be placed to monitor discrete locations within the roadway system. Such systems, methods, etc. may be deployed to monitor very specific traffic flow parameters and configured to provide very specific information; or, they may be configured to collect data necessary to many different tasks and services. The various system components (i.e. sensor devices 112, substation(s) 114 and control unit(s) 128) collaborate with each other as described herein to provide immediate and accurate traffic incident detection, congestion detection, one or more motor vehicle warning and/or informational signs and/or displays, etc.
Many features and advantages of the invention are apparent from the written description, and thus, the appended claims are intended to cover all such features and advantages. Further, numerous modifications and changes will readily occur to those skilled in the art, so the present invention is not limited to the exact operation and construction illustrated and described. Therefore, described embodiments are illustrative and not restrictive, and the invention should not be limited to the details given herein but should be defined by the following claims and their full scope of equivalents, whether foreseeable or unforeseeable now or in the future.
This patent application claims the benefit of and priority to the following prior filed and co-pending U.S. provisional patent applications, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes: U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/349,999 (Atty. Docket No. 0301-p06p) filed May 31, 2010, entitled “ROADWAY DETECTION” by Baldwin et al., including all Appendices;U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/350,000 (Atty. Docket No. 0301-p07p) filed May 31, 2010, entitled “TRAIN DETECTION” by Baldwin et al., including all Appendices;U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/358,374 (Atty. Docket No. 0301-p07p2) filed Jun. 24, 2010, entitled “TRAIN DETECTION” by Baldwin et al., including all Appendices. This application is related to the following co-pending cases, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes: PCT International Application No. PCT/US2011/038481 (Attorney Docket No. 0301-p07 WO), entitled “TRAIN DETECTION” by Baldwin et al., filed on even date herewith, May 30, 2011;U.S. Ser. No. 11/964,606 (Atty. Docket No. 0301-p03), filed Dec. 26, 2007, published Jul. 31, 2008 as United States Publication No. 2008/0183306 A1, entitled “VITAL SOLID STATE CONTROLLER” by Ashraf et al.;U.S. Ser. No. 12/014,630 (Atty. Docket No. 0301-p04), filed Jan. 15, 2008, published Jul. 17, 2008 as United States Publication No. 2008/0169385 A1, entitled “VEHICLE DETECTION SYSTEM” by Ashraf et al.
The invention was supported, in whole or in part, by Contract/Grant Numbers USDOT Phase 1 DRT57-08-C-10010 & USDOT Phase 2 DTRT57-09-C-10034 from the United States Department of Transportation. The United States Government may have certain rights in the invention in whole or in part. One or more inventions in U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/350,000 (Atty. Docket No. 0301-p07p) filed May 31, 2010, entitled TRAIN DETECTION, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/358,374 (Atty. Docket No. 0301-p07p1) filed 31 May 2010, entitled TRAIN DETECTION, were supported, in whole or in part, by Contract/Grant Numbers USDA SBIR 1 2006-33610-16783 & USDA SBIR 2 2007-33610-18611 from the United States Department of Agriculture. The United States Government may have certain rights in an invention of that application in whole or in part.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US11/38482 | 5/30/2011 | WO | 00 | 11/20/2012 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61350000 | May 2010 | US | |
61349999 | May 2010 | US | |
61358374 | Jun 2010 | US |