The present invention is related to roadway barriers and safety systems, and more particularly, to a roadway guardrail system having a rail and a plurality of support posts.
Along many roadways it may be hazardous for a vehicle to leave the roadway. As a result, roadway safety barriers, including guardrail systems, are used along roadways. The guardrail systems may act to contain and redirect an errant vehicle along such roadways. Such guardrail systems may dissipate some of the vehicle's energy through deformation of the rail or post, or both.
A guardrail system in the past may have included a plurality of rails secured to a plurality of support posts made of wood or steel. One type of rail was the “W-beam,” which is a guardrail named after its characteristic shape. Other railing configurations such as thrie beams and box beams were also used. Support posts may have been made of wood, metal or a combination of both.
Wooden support posts had several drawbacks. Wooden support posts were susceptible to deterioration from environmental exposure. As a result, wooden posts may have been treated with certain chemicals to slow deterioration, but such chemical treatments created additional expense in handling and in disposing of the treated wood. Wooden support posts also may have been installed in foundation sleeves or concrete foundations, while adding material costs and labor costs that resulted in a more expensive installation. Moreover, the same chemicals that aid in prolonging the life of the wooden posts can make the disposal of the posts on replacement a hazardous waste.
The trend has been toward using steel support posts, rather than wooden support posts, due to savings in material cost, durability, reliability, and maintenance. Steel posts have been installed by driving the posts directly into the ground, with or without a foundation sleeve as desired. Steel posts also could be treated to slow the effects of environmental exposure from rust and the like.
For improved safety, break away steel support posts that allow for failure during a collision have been developed. However, the design of break away steel support posts has remained relatively unchanged over the years. Such break away designs in the past may have had I-beam posts with cutouts or apertures along a portion of the post. At least some of the cutouts could be sized to receive fasteners for coupling the guardrail beam to the post. Other designs had the post in two sections joined with rotatable or releasable couplings that connected the two sections of the post and failed upon a sufficient impact force. However, such prior steel posts required substantial time, money, and resources during fabrication, modification, and installation.
The state of the art in guardrail systems has been documented and applied through specifications used by the industry. The United States Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration provides “Standard Specifications for Construction of Roads and Bridges on Federal Highway Projects,” including a section for guardrails and support posts. Industry groups such as the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials AASHTO, the Associated General Contractors (AGC) of America, and the American Road & Transportation Builders Association ARTBA have developed “A Guide to Standardized Highway Barrier Hardware” that included specifications for guardrails and posts. These specifications teach a guardrail system having a guardrail bolted to a large wood post or a large I-beam steel post. In general, in the past larger posts in guardrail systems better withstood impact forces to redirect a vehicle along the direction of the roadway.
A roadway guardrail system is presently disclosed to dissipate a portion of an impacting vehicle's energy and enable an impacting vehicle to be redirected by the system. The roadway guardrail system may be installed adjacent a roadway, such as along median strips, roadway shoulders, or any other path that is likely to encounter vehicular traffic.
The disclosed roadway guardrail system may comprise a rail having a plurality of mounting apertures, a plurality of support posts each having a slot extending along a portion of the length of the post such that a portion of the slot aligns with a rail mounting aperture at a desired height, and a plurality of fasteners each capable of fastening the rail to more than one support post through the slots and the mounting apertures to support the rail with the posts, such that upon a vehicle impact with the rail the fasteners are adapted to slide along the slot in the support post.
Alternatively, the disclosed roadway guardrail system may comprise a plurality of support posts each having a mounting aperture, a rail having laterally extending slots traverse the length of the rail such that a portion of a slot aligns with a post mounting aperture at a desired rail height, and a plurality of fasteners capable of fastening the rail to the posts through the laterally extending slots and the mounting apertures to support the rail with the posts, such that upon a vehicle impact with the rail the fasteners are adapted to slide along the slots in the rail.
Presently contemplated embodiments of the present guardrail system are described below by reference to the following figures:
Referring generally to
When the roadway guardrail system 50 is installed along the side of a roadway, the system is operable to dissipate a portion of an impacting vehicle's energy and to redirect the impacting vehicle along the general direction of the roadway. As the vehicle impacts the rail 100, the rail 100 may deflect and press against the support post 200 causing the support post 200 to deflect from its installed position. The deflection of the rail 100 and the support post 200 may dissipate a portion of the vehicle's impact energy. Additionally, forces and momentum from the vehicle impacting against the rail may cause the rail 100 to move relative to the support post 200 by the fastener 300 sliding within the slot 230, and maintaining the rail 100 in a retentive relationship and engage the vehicle to dissipate a further portion of the vehicle's impact energy and assist in redirecting the direction of the vehicle. As a result, the rail 100 may maintain contact with the impacting vehicle damping yaw, pitch, and roll of the impacting vehicle. If the impact force is sufficiently large, the support post 200 may fracture and dissipate more of the vehicle's impact energy.
The rail 100 may be a W-beam guardrail, as shown in
The support post 200 shown in
As shown in
The support post 200 may be constructed of steel having carbon content between about 0.4% and 1.0% by weight. Alternately, the steel of the support post 200 may have carbon content in a range between about 0.69% and 0.75% by weight. In yet another alternate, the steel of the support post 200 may have carbon content in a range between about 0.40% and 0.45% by weight. The support post material may have yield strength between about 60,000 lbs/in.sup.2 and about 100,000 lbs/in.sup.2, and a tensile strength greater than about 80,000 lbs/in.sup.2. Alternately, the support post 200 may have a yield strength greater than about 60,000 lbs/in.sup.2 and a tensile strength greater than about 90,000 lbs/in.sup.2. In yet another alternate, the support post 200 may have a yield strength greater than about 80,000 lbs/in.sup.2 and a tensile strength greater than about 120,000 lbs/in.sup.2. The yield strength may allow the support post 200 to provide sufficient support to resist the vehicle impact forces associated with a rail impact, and may then fracture to allow more energy to be absorbed.
The support post 200 may have a weight between about 2 and 7 pounds per foot of post length (between about 2.9 and 10.4 kilograms per meter). The weight of the support post 200 as shown in
By way of example, and not limitation, the support post 200 may be formed from U.S. new-billet steel, rail steel, or other types of steel alloys or other materials with the desired strength for the roadway guardrail system 50. Further, the support post 200 may have a coating of polyester to provide durability and protection against rusting. Alternatively, the support post 200 may be hot-dip coated with zinc, aluminum, chromate, zinc-aluminum alloy or other coating to provide protection against the elements.
The length of the support post 200 may be between about 50 inches (about 1.3 meters) and about 100 inches (about 2.5 meters). Alternately, the length of the support post 200 may be about 72 inches (about 1.8 meters) to about 78 inches (about 2.0 meters). When the support post 200 is installed, the exposed length 207 may be about 28 inches (about 0.7 meters) to about 34 inches (about 0.9 meters). An exposed length 207 in the range described corresponds to a rail height that may be about half the height of many cars and pickup trucks to redirect the vehicle along the direction of the guardrail upon impact.
The slot 230 may enable the rail 100 to move relative to the support post 200 under an impact force to absorb and dissipate energy and redirect the impacting vehicle. The slot 230 also provides an aperture through which the fastener 300 may extend to secure the rail 100 to the support post 200. The slot 230 may further provide installers with vertical adjustability when desired for mounting the rail 100 along a series of posts 200. Although the slot 230 is shown as having a generally rectangular shape with rounded ends, other geometries and configurations may be used in certain embodiments as desired.
The slot 230 has a slot width 235 capable of receiving the fastener 300 and allowing the fastener to slide within the slot. The slot 230 may be configured to inhibit the movement of the fastener 300 along the slot as the rail 100 moves along the support post 200 during impact of a vehicle with the guardrail system. The slot 230 may, for example, be tapered in slot width, serrated, or stepped or key-holed to inhibit movement of the fastener 30 along the slot. In any event, the slot may operate to slow the translational movement of the fastener 300 along the slot by providing a suitable amount of friction or binding by the fastener against the slot walls.
As noted, the slot length 236 may be any suitable length to allow for translational or sliding movement of the fastener 300 enabling the rail to move relative to the post to maintain retentive relationship and engage an impacting vehicle to dissipate impact energy and redirect the impacting vehicle. In the post shown in
The support post 200 may be designed such that the slot length 236 is correlated to the exposed length 207 of the support post 200 above ground. For example, the slot length 236 may be at least ten percent of the exposed length 207. In another example, the slot length 236 may be at least seventeen percent of the exposed length 207.
Alternately or in addition, the slot length 236 may be correlated to the spacing between support posts 200. The spacing between posts 200 may have an effect on the overall deflection of the roadway guardrail system 50. The deflection, in turn, may influence the amount of translational movement of the fastener 300 within the slot 230. If the deflection is greater, the permitted translational movement of the fastener 300 within the slot 230 may be adjusted to accommodate the desired deflection. Correlation between the slot length 236 and the post spacing may be from about 1:10 to about 1:20, and alternatively from about 1:12 to about 1:15.
In some guardrail installations the first end 210 of the support post 200 may not extend above the top of the rail 100. Also, it may be desired that the second end 232 of the slot 230 not extend below the bottom of the rail 100. Therefore, for such installations, it may be suitable that the slot length 236 be equal to or less than about the height of the rail 100, or alternatively, less than approximately 95% of the height of the rail 100. However, as the fastener 300 may be positioned at or near the second end 232 of the slot 230, it may be desired that the slot length 236 be about 50% of the height of the rail 100.
The slot 230 may be positioned on the support post 200 such that the distance between the slot first end 231 and the post first end 210 is greater than or equal to about 5% of the height of the rail 100. Further, the slot second end 232 may be positioned a distance from the post first end 210 of less than, or equal to, about 50% of the height of the rail 100.
The distance between the slot first end 231 and the first end 210 of the post 200 may affect the amount of force to cause the support post 200 to fracture. The slot may be positioned such that the slot first end 231 is spaced a distance less than about 10 slot widths 235 from the post first end 210.
Installation of the support post 200 may be completed using various techniques which are well known in the art. The particular technique used may depend upon the type of soil conditions and other factors associated with the roadway, and the type of hazard involved in installation of the roadway guardrail system 50. Additionally, the support post 200 may be installed with or without the use of metal foundation tubes or a concrete foundation.
As shown in
As shown in
Referring to
In
Similarly, the support post 200 may include friction enhancing surface characteristics in at least a portion of the area contacting the reinforcing member 310, or rail 100, during the fastener's 300 translational movement in the slot 230. Such surface characteristics may enhance the system's ability to dissipate energy and redirect an impacting vehicle. The friction enhancing surface characteristic may include virtually all types of surface patterns. Additionally, the friction enhancing surfaces of the support post 200 and the reinforcing member 310 contact one another to enhance energy dissipation.
Referring to
The configuration of
The reinforcing member 310 may have at least the same thickness and yield strength as the rail 100. In
Alternately or in addition, a block-out 400 may be positioned between the rail 100 and the support post 200. The block-out 400 may be about 14 inches.times.3⅝ inches (about 355.6 millimeter.times.92.1 millimeter) and provides a lateral offset of about 8 inches (203 millimeter) between the support post 200 and the rail 100. The distance and direction of the lateral offset may be selected such that the wheels of an impacting vehicle are less likely to strike the support post 200 during a rail impact. The block-out 400 may have a projection that mounts on top of the support post 200 and a projection that contacts the particular cross-section or contour of the support post 200 to facilitate installation. The plastic block-outs may be manufactured from a 50% blend of new and recycled HDPE (high density polyethylene).
When block-outs 400 are used, the fastener 300 may include a longer post bolt 320 such as but not limited to a ⅝ inch.times.12 inch (15.9 millimeter.times.304.8 millimeter) post bolt, with the nut 330 such as but not limited to a splice nut.
Referring now to
The rail 100 may be a W-beam guardrail, thrie beam, box beam, or other type of corrugated or non-corrugated guardrail. The rail 100 may be configured to accommodate the slot 230 extending traverse the length of the rail adjacent each support post 200 location along the length of the rail.
The fastener 300 may be positioned at or near the first end of the slot 230 in the rail 100. When a vehicle impacts the rail 100, forces may cause the rail 100 to move relative to the support post 200 such that the fastener 300 may slide within the slot 230 in the rail 100 thereby dissipating a portion of the vehicle's impact energy and assisting in redirecting the impacting vehicle. Additionally, deflection of the rail 100 and the support post 200 may also dissipate a portion of the vehicle's impact energy and assist in redirecting the impacting vehicle. If the impact force is sufficient, the support post 200 may fracture further dissipating the vehicle's impact energy.
While the invention has been described with detailed reference to one or more embodiments, the disclosure is to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive. Modifications and alterations will occur to those skilled in the art upon a reading and understanding of this specification. It is intended to include all such modifications and alterations in so far as they come within the scope of the claims, or the equivalents thereof.
This application claims priority to and is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/842,736, filed on Aug. 21, 2007, entitled “Roadway Guardrail System”, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2025014 | Brickman et al. | Dec 1935 | A |
2101176 | Height | Dec 1937 | A |
2520313 | Harris | Aug 1950 | A |
2776116 | Brickman | Jan 1957 | A |
3214142 | Brown | Oct 1965 | A |
3493213 | Ackerman | Feb 1970 | A |
4126403 | Sweeney et al. | Nov 1978 | A |
4460161 | Grenga | Jul 1984 | A |
4655434 | Bronstad | Apr 1987 | A |
4784515 | Krage et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4838523 | Humble et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
5044609 | Cicinnati et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5125194 | Granger | Jun 1992 | A |
5203543 | Fleury | Apr 1993 | A |
5851005 | Muller et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5957435 | Bronstad | Sep 1999 | A |
5967497 | Denman et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6036399 | Schalk | Mar 2000 | A |
6173943 | Welch et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6254063 | Rohde et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6328284 | Wilding | Dec 2001 | B2 |
6398192 | Albritton | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6488268 | Albritton | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6558067 | Ochoa | May 2003 | B2 |
6588972 | Bergeson et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6644888 | Ochoa | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6758627 | King | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6793204 | Albritton | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6902150 | Alberson et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6932327 | Alberson et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6962328 | Bergendahl | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7101111 | Albritton | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7234687 | King | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7478796 | Burkett | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7878485 | Conway et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
20060027797 | Sicking et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20070063179 | Alberson et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080067484 | Pericas | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20090050863 | Conway et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090050864 | Conway et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 708 206 | Apr 1996 | EP |
0 708 206 | Apr 1996 | EP |
1624111 | Feb 2006 | EP |
2005120577 | May 2005 | JP |
20-1998-0008281 | Apr 1998 | KR |
10-2006-0026337 | Mar 2006 | KR |
WO-0028147 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 2006027394 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO 2009025997 | Feb 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for PCT/US2008/072318 mailed Feb. 18, 2009. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/US2008/072318 mailed Feb. 18, 2009. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2008/072318 mailed Mar. 4, 2010. |
Examination Report for New Zealand Patent Application No. 583434 mailed Oct. 13, 2011. |
Examination Report for New Zealand Patent Application No. 595646 mailed Oct. 13, 2011. |
Examination Report for Australian Patent Application No. 2011101260 mailed Nov. 8, 2011. |
Examination Report for New Zealand Patent Application No. 583434 mailed Jan. 6, 2012. |
Standard Specifications for Construction of Roads and Bridges on Federal Highway Projects; US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration; FP-96 1996; US Government Printing Office; Washington DC US. |
Australian Examination Report for Application No. 2008289335 dated Apr. 18, 2012. |
New Zealand Examination Report for Application No. 595646 dated Apr. 23, 2012. |
Office Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,697,037 dated Mar. 19, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120119175 A1 | May 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11842736 | Aug 2007 | US |
Child | 13359359 | US |