The present invention relates in general to robotic devices and, more particularly, to active and compliant artificial joints and limbs including a parallel mechanism.
Prosthetic and orthotic devices help restore mobility to people who lack able-bodied motion or gait. Prosthetic devices are intended to replace the function or appearance of a missing limb and can return mobility to the wearer or user. Orthotic devices are intended to support or supplement an existing limb, by assisting with movement, reducing weight-bearing loads on the body, reducing pain, and controlling or restricting movement. Prosthetic and orthotic devices are available to replace or support various portions of the body. Lower limb prosthetic devices include, for example, the prosthetic foot, the foot-ankle prosthesis, the prosthetic knee joint, and the prosthetic hip joint. Lower limb orthotic devices include, for example, the foot orthoses, the ankle-foot orthoses, the knee-ankle-foot orthoses, and the knee orthoses. People who require a lower limb prosthesis or orthosis often expend more metabolic power to walk or move at the same speed as able-bodied individuals. One goal of lower limb prosthetic and orthotic devices is to help the user achieve a normal gait while reducing energy expended by the user.
Prosthetic and orthotic devices can be divided into two groups, passive devices and active devices. Passive lower limb prosthetics generally rely on compliant members, such as springs, to store and release energy. A spring is able to return only as much energy as is put into the spring. Thus, the energy that is released by a spring in a passive device is limited to the energy that is put in by the user. For example, a spring-based passive foot prosthetic provides about half of the peak power required for gait. The user of a passive device must expend additional energy through other muscles and joints to maintain a normal walking gait. Therefore, passive prosthetic and orthotic designs are limited in capacity to help users reduce metabolic energy expenditure while achieving a normal walking gait and performing other activities.
Active devices differ from passive devices in that active devices use a motor to supply power to the device and to control the device. Current active device designs are inefficient, either requiring relatively large motors, which are heavy and undesirable for wearable devices, or providing low peak power output, which is insufficient for many activities. Control systems for active devices are limited in capability to control active devices. Active prosthetics are typically restricted to a single degree of freedom, which reduces the motion available to the device. Further, active prosthetics are limited to low power activities, because the power necessary for high power activities is unattainable in a small portable system. One goal of active device designs is to increase efficiency of the active components and to build a lighter weight device.
Prosthetic devices are typically designed for a specific activity, such as walking. The majority of active compliant devices utilize a traditional rigid structure. The traditional rigid structure typically includes links powered by actuators such as electric motors or hydraulics. One strategy employs an architecture having a joint which is powered by a compliant member, such as a spring, and an active member, such as a motor driven screw, arranged in series. An activity-specific design strategy and traditional rigid structures may be suited for one specific activity, but the designs are limited in application and are not efficient beyond the intended activity. For example, devices designed for walking perform poorly for running, navigating uneven terrain, walking up and down inclines or stairs, or simply balancing while standing. Carrying heavy loads or transitioning from walking to running remains a challenge for users. Current active devices are ineffective for activities requiring both high velocities under low load and low velocities under high load. Another goal of prosthetic device designs is to perform more similarly to a human muscle during a variety of activities.
A need exists for prosthetic and orthotic devices that are better able to mimic the performance of human muscles over a wide range of activities. Accordingly, in one embodiment, the present invention is a method of making a prosthetic joint device comprising the steps of providing a base body, providing a movable body, disposing a first actuator connected between a first joint of the movable body and a first joint of the base body, disposing a second actuator in parallel with the first actuator and connected between a second joint of the movable body and a second joint of the base body, and disposing a passive linking member connected to a third joint of the movable body and further connected to a third joint of the base body. The second joint of the moveable body is disposed between the first joint of the moveable body and third joint of the moveable body to provide rotation of the passive linking member with respect to the base body.
In another embodiment, the present invention is a method of making a prosthetic joint device comprising the steps of providing a base body, providing a movable body, disposing a first linking member connected between a first joint of the movable body and a first joint of the base body, disposing a second linking member connected between a second joint of the movable body and a second joint of the base body, and disposing a passive linking member connected to a third joint of the movable body and further connected to a third joint of the base body to provide rotation of the passive linking member with respect to the base body.
In another embodiment, the present invention is a prosthetic joint device comprising a base body and movable body. A first actuator is connected between a first joint of the movable body and a first joint of the base body. A second actuator is connected between a second joint of the movable body and a second joint of the base body. A passive linking member is connected to a third joint of the movable body and further connected to a third joint of the base body to provide rotation of the passive linking member with respect to the base body.
In another embodiment, the present invention is a prosthetic joint device comprising a base body and movable body. A first linking member is connected between a first joint of the movable body and a first joint of the base body. A second linking member is connected between a second joint of the movable body and a second joint of the base body. A passive linking member is connected to a third joint of the movable body and further connected to a third joint of the base body to provide rotation of the passive linking member with respect to the base body.
The present invention is described in one or more embodiments in the following description with reference to the figures, in which like numerals represent the same or similar elements. While the invention is described in terms of the best mode for achieving the invention's objectives, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that it is intended to cover alternatives, modifications, and equivalents as may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims and their equivalents as supported by the following disclosure and drawings.
An active prosthetic device is a wearable robotic device controlled by a computerized control system. The active prosthetic devices described herein incorporate parallel mechanisms to improve the performance of the devices. The parallel mechanisms couple springs and motors in a parallel kinematically redundant arrangement in order to provide prosthetic devices which behave more like human muscles.
Active compliant parallel devices 100, 200, and 300 move and position one or more elements in space when the element is both unrestricted and under external load. The element which active compliant parallel devices 100, 200, and 300 that move and position is movable body 1 or one or more linking members 3. Movable body 1 or one or more linking member 3 is considered an ultimate working member. An ultimate working member is a component that is the output of the device. Alternatively, movable body 1 or linking member 3 is coupled to one or more other bodies, which are working members by connection through one or more linking bodies. In another embodiment, the element which active compliant parallel devices 100, 200, and 300 move and position is a combination of movable body 1 and one or more linking members 3. Movable body 1 and one or more of linking members 3 are the ultimate working members. Alternatively, movable body 1 and linking members 3 is connected to one or more other bodies, which are the working members by connection through one or more additional linking bodies.
Linking members 3 shown in
Therefore, movable body 1 is linked to base body 2 by actuating linking members 33, compliant linking members 34, passive linking members, damping linking members, or a combination thereof. Actuating linking members 33, compliant linking members 34, passive linking members, or damping linking members are arranged in a parallel arrangement or structure, meaning each member makes a connection, using a connection element 4, with base body 2 and also with movable body 1. Actuating elements, compliant elements, or damping elements are applied to any of linking members 3 and can reside on the same linking member 3.
Each linking member 3 is a kinematic chain made up of bodies connected by various joint types. The joint types for linking members 3 include revolute joints, prismatic joints, screw-type joints, or other joint types. The joint type may further include one or more higher pair joint types, which are represented by a combination of revolute joints, prismatic joints, screw-type joints, or other joint types.
The kinematic freedom of movable body 1 with respect to base body 2 before being connected by linking members 3 is six, i.e., three translational degrees of freedom and three rotational degrees of freedom. Each linking member 3 is arranged so that its kinematic constraints of motion between base body 2 and movable body 1 are such that from zero to five kinematic freedoms are lost before the application of actuating, compliant, or damping elements to any of linking members 3. Each lost freedom is described instantaneously by a rotation, a translation, or a linear combination of a rotation and a translation.
One or more of the degrees of freedom of linking member 3 are controlled by actuating linking members 33, compliant linking members 34, and damping linking members. A controlled freedom is one that is regulated by a controlling element. The controlling element includes actuating, compliant, or damping elements, as determined by the type of linking member 3. A controlled freedom is not considered a constraint on the motion of movable body 1 with respect to base body 2 by linking member 3.
Actuating linking members 33 are configured such that one or more of the joints or the degrees of freedom of linking member 3 are controlled by an active component, such as a motor. Actuating linking members 33 are configured such that one or more of the joints of linking member 3 are actuated at the joint, or one or more of the joints of linking member 3 are replaced by an actuating element, or one or more of the degrees of freedom of linking member 3 are actuated across any number of the joints of linking member 3. An actuating element of actuating linking member 33 is any type of controllable position or force type actuator.
Compliant linking members 34 are configured such that one or more of the joints or the degrees of freedom of linking member 3 are controlled by a compliant element, such as a spring. Compliant linking members are configured such that one or more of the joints of linking member 3 are controlled by a compliant element, or one or more of the joints of linking member 3 are replaced by a compliant element, or one or more of the degrees of freedom of linking member 3 are controlled by a compliant element across any number of the joints of linking member 3. A compliant element of a compliant linking member 34 is a fixed rate compliant element, an adjustable variable rate compliant element, or a controllable variable rate compliant element.
Passive linking members are configured such that no joint of linking member 3 is regulated by a controlling element, no joint of the member is replaced by a controlling element, and no degree of freedom of linking member 3 is regulated by a controlling element.
Damping linking members are configured such that one or more of the joints or the degrees of freedom of linking member 3 are controlled by a damping component, such as a dashpot. Damping linking members are configured such that one or more of the joints of linking member 3 are controlled by a damping element, or one or more of the joints of linking member 3 are replaced by a damping element, or one or more of the degrees of freedom of linking member 3 are controlled by a damping element across any number of the joints of linking member 3. A damping element of a damping linking member is a fixed rate damping element, an adjustable variable rate damping element, or a controllable variable rate damping element.
Combination linking members are configured such that one or more of the joints of linking member 3 are controlled by an actuating, compliant, or damping element. Alternatively, one or more of the joints of the member are replaced by an actuating, compliant, or damping element. One or more of the degrees of freedom of linking member 3 are controlled by an actuating, compliant, or damping element across any number of the joints of linking member 3. Additional joints or the same joints of linking member 3 are controlled by a controlling element of a different type, replaced by a controlling element of a different type, or additional or the same degrees of freedom of linking member 3 are controlled by a controlling element of a different type.
An actuating element of a combination linking member is any type of controllable position or force type actuator. A compliant element of a combination linking member is a fixed rate compliant element, an adjustable variable rate compliant element, or a controllable variable rate compliant element. A damping element of a combination linking member is a fixed rate damping element, an adjustable variable rate damping element, or a controllable variable rate damping element.
By providing compliant linking members 34 in combination with actuating linking members 33 in a parallel arrangement, the structure allows for a change in geometry based on load, thereby effecting a change in transmission ratio of the input to the output of the device. Configurations with a combination of active and compliant linking members are especially adapted for applications where high velocities under low load are needed at times and low velocities under high load are needed at other times.
Linking members 3 are used to constrain motion of movable body 1 with respect to base body 2 so that the number of controlled freedoms, by actuation, compliance, or damping, of linking members 3 is equal to the number of freedoms afforded to movable body 1 with respect to base body 2 by linking members 3. In another embodiment, linking members 3 are used to constrain the motion of movable body 1 with respect to base body 2 so that the number of controlled freedoms, by actuation, compliance, or damping, of linking members 3 is greater than the number of freedoms afforded to movable body 1 with respect to base body 2 by linking members 3. In yet another embodiment, linking members 3 are used to constrain the motion of movable body 1 with respect to base body 2 so that the number of controlled freedoms, by actuation, compliance, or damping, of linking members 3 is less than the number of freedoms afforded to movable body 1 with respect to base body 2 by linking members 3. Therefore, by coupling movable body 1 in parallel with base body 2 with a combination of actuating, compliant, passive, and damping members, the geometry of the structure of active compliant parallel devices 100, 200, and 300 changes according to applied load. Because the geometry can be changed according to the applied load, the ratio of the output to the input of actuating linking members 33 is optimized for the task and type of actuators.
To achieve a desired behavior, the following properties are selected for the device: (1) the number of different types of linking members, (2) the arrangement and geometry of the kinematic chains that make up linking members 3, (3) the geometry of the connections, i.e., the connection locations on base body 2 and movable body 1, (4) the spring rates of compliant linking members 34, and (5) the damping rates of the damping linking members. The number and type of actuating linking members 33, compliant linking members 34, passive linking members, and damping linking members are determined by the desired degree of constraint or freedom from the active compliant parallel devices 100, 200, and 300.
Active compliant parallel devices 100, 200, and 300 provide for multiple advantages. One advantage, made possible by compliant linking members 34, is the change in geometry according to applied load. A change in geometry according to the applied load allows the position of the structure to change so that under high force or torque load, lower force or torque and higher speed is required of actuating linking members 33. Under low force or torque, higher force or torque and lower speed is required of actuating linking members 33. The result is an increased range in force or torque output and at the same time an increased range in speed. Through the parallel nature of the structure, a given load is distributed among linking members 3 resulting in lower loads for individual components. Because of the changing geometry, nonlinear spring behavior is more easily achievable. Spatial, as well as any lesser degree of freedom, compliant and actuating behavior is realized by choosing the number and constraints of linking members 3 to yield the desired properties.
Where damping linking members are included in active compliant parallel device 100, the number of actuated freedoms plus the number of compliantly controlled freedoms plus the number of damped freedoms is equal to the total freedom of the motion of movable body 1 in relation to base body 2 allowed by linking members 3. The result is that movable body 1 is fully controlled by linking members 3 in relation to base body 2 but not redundantly so.
Where damping members are included in device 200, constraint of the motion of movable body 1 in relation to base body 2 by linking members 3 is such that the number of actuated freedoms plus the number of compliantly controlled freedoms plus the number of damped freedoms is greater than the total freedom of the motion of movable body 1 in relation to base body 2 allowed by linking members 3. The result is that movable body 1 is fully controlled by linking members 3 in relation to base body 2 with a redundant amount of constraints. The redundant constraints are applied by actuating linking members 33, compliant linking members 34, passive linking members, damping linking members, or any combination of the same. An example of a qualifying arrangement is shown in
Where damping members are included in device 300, constraint of the motion of movable body 1 in relation to base body 2 by linking members 3 is such that the number of actuated freedoms plus the number of compliantly controlled freedoms plus the number of damped freedoms is less than the total freedom of the motion of movable body 1 in relation to base body 2 allowed by linking members 3. The result is that movable body 1 is not fully constrained with relation to base body 2. Thus, there exist degrees of freedom of movable body 1 in relation to base body 2 that are not constrained by any of actuating linking members 33, compliant linking members 34, or damping linking members. An example of a qualifying arrangement is shown in
In
Base body 26 represents the fixed portions within active compliant parallel device 900 to which the movable members are attached. Base body 26 is fixed with respect to the user, while the device as a whole is wearable and portable. Passive linking member 29, compliant linking member 31, and actuating linking member 32 link movable body 25 to base body 26 by means of revolute joints 30a-30f, which each have an axis that is normal to the plane of the figure. Revolute joints 30a-30f provide for rotational coupling. For example, movable body 25 is rotationally coupled to passive linking member 29, compliant linking member 31, and actuating linking member 32. Passive linking member 29, compliant linking member 31, and actuating linking member 32 are rotationally coupled to base body 26.
Actuating element 27 of actuating linking member 32 is coupled to base body 26 at revolute joint 30a and is coupled to movable body 25 at revolute joint 30b. Actuating linking member 32 couples base body 26 to movable body 25 at revolute joints 30a and 30b. Revolute joint 30a is disposed in a fixed position on base body 26. Compliant element 28 of compliant linking member 31 is coupled to base body 26 at revolute joint 30c and is coupled to movable body 25 at revolute joint 30d. Thus, compliant linking member 31 couples base body 26 to movable body 25 at revolute joints 30c and 30d. Revolute joint 30c is disposed in a fixed position on base body 26. Movable body 25 is also coupled to base body 26 by passive linking member 29. Passive linking member 29 is coupled to movable body 25 at revolute joint 30e and is coupled to base body 26 at revolute joint 30f. Revolute joint 30f is disposed in a fixed position on base body 26.
Therefore, compliant element 28 and actuating element 27 are disposed in parallel between movable body 25 and base body 26 to form active compliant parallel device 900. As compliant element 28 compresses or extends, compliant linking member 31 changes in length. The change in length of compliant linking member 31 produces a force which pushes or pulls on movable body 25 at revolute joint 30d, causing movable body 25 to move with respect to base body 26. Similarly, actuating element 27 pushes or pulls on movable body 25 at revolute joint 30b by lengthening or shortening actuating linking member 32, causing movable body 25 to move with respect to base body 26. Passive linking member 29 is coupled to movable body 25 such that as movable body 25 moves, passive linking member 29 also moves. Passive linking member 29 rotates about revolute joint 30f as actuating element 27 and compliant element 28 act on movable body 25. The rotation or motion of passive linking member 29 is thereby controlled through movable body 25 by compliant element 28 and actuating element 27.
Compliant element 28 may be a tuned helical or coil spring with a stiffness which is optimized for efficient storage and release of energy during gait. Actuating element 27 may be a direct current (DC) motor with a gear ratio optimized for efficient use of power during actuation. Actuating element 27 and compliant element 28 work in parallel to mimic the action of the muscles, tendons, ligaments, and joints at work in a human ankle. Actuating element 27 and compliant element 28 are contained in a housing 40 of the foot-ankle prosthesis. Shank 42 or housing 40 of the foot-ankle prosthesis includes or couples to a socket, which fits onto a residual limb of the user. The user inputs forces through shank 42 acting on active compliant parallel device 900. Housing 40 and shank 42 are fixed with respect to base body 26 and comprise part of base body 126. Base body 26 encompasses the portions of active compliant parallel device 900 which are fixed together within the device.
During a typical walking gait cycle, the moment required from a human reaches a maximum value of approximately 1.25 newton meters per kilogram (N-m/kg) of body weight, while the typical velocity reaches a maximum of approximately 450 degrees per second, and the maximum power reaches approximately 6.5 watts per kilogram (W/kg) of body weight. Thus, the output moment, for example, ranges from about 1-1.5 N-m/kg of body weight. The output velocity ranges from about 400-450 degrees per second. The output power ranges from about 6-7 W/kg of body weight. Through the use of active compliant parallel device 900, approximately the same output moment, velocity, and power required during gait is supplied from an actuator which provides 2.3 W/kg of body mass.
Compliant linking member 31 and actuating linking member 32 each comprise a prismatic joint. The length of compliant linking member 31 is the distance between revolute joint 30c and revolute joint 30d. The length of compliant linking member 31 is determined by compression or extension of compliant element 28 and is related to the force applied to compliant element 28. The length of actuating linking member 32 is the distance between revolute joint 30a and revolute joint 30b. The length of actuating linking member 32 is controlled by actuating element 27. The length of compliant linking member 31 and actuating linking member 32 comprise the input positions for active compliant parallel device 900. Active compliant parallel device 900 is a kinematically redundant system, which includes a greater number of input position variables than output position variables. The output force of active compliant parallel device 900 is a function of the input force and the input position of each linking member.
The input and output positions of active compliant parallel device 900 are determined by measuring the length of compliant linking member 31 and actuating linking member 32 either directly or indirectly. In one embodiment, actuating element 27 is a screw-type motor and is encoded to count the number of rotations of the motor to calculate the length of actuating linking member 32. The length of compliant linking member 31 is determined indirectly by measuring the rotation at revolute joint 30f and by calculating the length of compliant linking member 31 using the length of actuating linking member 32 and the rotation at revolute joint 30f. Alternatively, sensors are disposed on one or more joints or linking members of active compliant parallel device 900 to measure the input positions of compliant linking member 31 and actuating linking member 32. In an implementation of active compliant parallel device 900 for an orthotic device, sensors may be disposed on a limb of the user and on the device. The input positions of active compliant parallel device 900 are denoted by variables (1).
x=[x1, x2]T (1)
where: x1 is the length of actuating linking member 32
x2 is the length of compliant linking member 31
Alternatively, active compliant parallel device 900 includes one or more additional compliant members, linking members, damping members, or passive members coupled to base body 26 and movable body 25. The input positions of an alternative active compliant parallel mechanism including additional linking members are denoted by variables (2).
x=[x1, x2, x3 . . . ]T (2)
The output position of active compliant parallel device 900 is measured using a sensor disposed on revolute joint 30f to measure the rotation or angle of passive linking member 29. Alternatively, the output position may be measured directly or indirectly by sensors disposed on one or more joints or linking members of active compliant parallel device 900. The output position of passive linking member 29 in active compliant parallel device 900 is denoted as y.
Alternatively, active compliant parallel device 900 includes one or more additional linking members as outputs. The output positions of an alternative active compliant parallel mechanism including additional outputs are denoted by variables (3).
y=[y1, y2, y3 . . . ]T (3)
The output position, y, of active compliant parallel device 900 is a function of the input positions, x1 and x2. Alternatively, active compliant parallel device 900 includes one or more additional inputs or outputs. For an alternative active compliant parallel mechanism including additional inputs and outputs, the output position is written as a function of the input positions in equation (4).
y=[y1(x1, x2, . . . ) y2 (x1, x2, . . . ) y3(x1, x2, . . . ) . . . ]T (4)
The velocity at the output is written as a function of the velocity of the inputs by taking the time derivative of the input and output positions, resulting in a matrix known as the Jacobian denoted by J in equation (5) and equation (6).
For a kinematically redundant system such as active compliant parallel device 900, the number of inputs, represented by n, is greater than the number of outputs, represented by m. In one embodiment, active compliant parallel device 900 has one extra degree of freedom at the input. The extra degree of freedom allows the internal geometry of active compliant parallel device 900 to be controlled and the transmission ratio of actuating element 27 to be adjusted. In another embodiment, active compliant parallel device 900 has additional degrees of freedom to make a biarticular device. For example, active compliant parallel device 900 moves in the sagittal plane and in the coronal plane such that the device includes two directions of motion, or two degrees of freedom.
The power input into active compliant parallel device 900 equals the power output and is shown generally by equation (7).
Powerin={dot over (x)}T Fx={dot over (y)}T Fy=Powerout (7)
Applying equation (7) specifically with respect to active compliant parallel device 900, the input force, Fx, represents the force along actuating linking member 32 at length or position x1 and the force along compliant linking member 31 at length or position x2. The output force, Fy, represents the moment around revolute joint 30f, which is the joint about which passive linking member 29 rotates. The power output of active compliant parallel device 900 is equal to the sum of the power input from compliant element 28 and actuating element 27. The relationship between the input force of active compliant parallel device 900 and the output force is defined by equation (8). Equation (8) is obtained by substituting equation (5) into equation (7).
Fx=JT Fy (8)
The input positions of compliant linking member 31, actuating linking member 32, and passive linking member 29 vary with the amount of force put into the device by the user. As the user applies force to active compliant parallel device 900 during gait, compliant element 28 changes in length, which changes the ratio of input force to output force. Equation (5), the Jacobian, is highly dependent on the length of compliant linking member 31, i.e., the length of the spring, and is less dependent on the output angle of passive linking member 29. The geometry within active compliant parallel device 900, such as the position of each of revolute joints 30a-30f with respect to the linking members and base body 26, is selected to optimize the transmission ratio of the device. The stiffness of active compliant parallel device 900 is thereby is tuned by selecting the internal geometry of active compliant parallel device 900 according to the user's needs and desired stiffness of the device.
Active compliant parallel device 900 better mimics a human ankle over a range of activities. The anatomy and mechanical properties of the human ankle are such that the elasticity and the load displacement response of the ankle behave like a non-linear spring. Active compliant parallel device 900 has an adjustable or tunable stiffness to allow for high performance over a range of speeds. For example, as more force is applied to compliant element 28 and actuating element 27, the geometry of active compliant parallel device 900 changes so that less torque and more velocity is required from actuating element 27. When output force is high, active compliant parallel device 900 requires less torque and more velocity. When output torque is low, active compliant parallel device 900 requires more torque and less velocity.
Between the heel strike and foot planted phase of gait, passive linking member (prosthetic foot) 29 rotates with respect to base body 26 at joint 30f, which is hidden from view in
Compliant element 28 includes a spring, which is able to store and release energy. Compliant element 28 is compressed by the forward motion of base body 26 and stores potential energy during compression. The stiffness of compliant element 28 is selected to provide the optimal resistance to the user without causing too much resistance so as to cause the user to expend extra metabolic energy during gait. Actuating element 27 engages to compress compliant element 28. In one embodiment, actuating element 27 pulls on movable body 25 at revolute joint 30b to compress compliant element 28. The input position, velocity, or force of actuating element 27 is measured using a sensor. Based on the input measurement, actuating element 27 engages to change the length of actuating linking member 32, which causes a change to the internal geometry of active compliant parallel device 900. The change in geometry also causes a change in the length of compliant element 28 and compliant linking member 31. By changing the length of compliant element 28 by further compressing the spring, the additional energy is added by actuating element 27 and stored in compliant element 28.
Actuating element 27 engages as compliant element 28 is compressed to further compress compliant element 28. Actuating element 27 engages to either shorten or lengthen actuating linking member 32, as needed to compress compliant element 28. The force on movable body 25 by actuating element 27 causes additional compression in compliant element 28. Compliant element 28 is compressed by the motion of base body 26 caused by the movement of shank 42 over passive linking member 29, and compliant element 28 is further compressed by the added power from actuating element 27. Actuating element 27 therefore, increases the amount of potential energy stored by compliant element 28. The potential energy stored in compliant element 28 is later used during the push-off phase of the gait cycle.
A traditional passive device using only a spring is able to store the amount of energy inputted by the user. The energy returned to the user in a traditional passive device is equal to the energy put into the spring compression by the user. Active compliant parallel device 900 allows the spring, compliant element 28, to store additional energy by increasing the spring compression using a motor, actuating element 27. The energy returned to the user by active compliant parallel device 900 is greater than the energy put in by the user.
The potential energy stored in compliant element 28 during the phase of gait shown in
The push off phase of gait requires the maximum amount of power compared to the other phases of gait. For example, an 80 kg human may require up to 350 W of peak power in the ankle during push off. The amount of energy output provided by active compliant parallel device 900 during push off is equal to the sum of the power provided by actuating element 27 and compliant element 28. Compliant element 28 provides power as the spring unloads from the compressed position. The amount of power provided by compliant element 28 is directly related to the amount of compression in the spring. Actuating element 27 provides power by pulling on movable body 25 at revolute joint 30b during push off. Actuating element 27 requires peak power during the push off phase. The combined power of compliant element 28 and actuating element 27 results in the output power for active compliant parallel device 900.
The peak power output required from actuating element 27 is reduced in active compliant parallel device 900 compared to other power prosthesis designs. The parallel design of active compliant parallel device 900 allows actuating element 27 to supply power to the device over a longer time interval. Actuating element 27 begins supplying power to compress compliant element 28 during the previous phase of gait shown in
The peak power output required from actuating element 27 determines the size of the motor required for actuating element 27 to perform push off. A greater peak power requirement means a larger motor is needed to supply that peak power. Active compliant parallel device 900 reduces the peak power output required from actuating element 27 during push off. Therefore, the size of the motor used for actuating element 27 is smaller. In one embodiment, actuating element 27 is a 150 W DC motor with a 28 volt battery. A smaller motor allows for a more compact and lighter weight prosthetic device, which is more comfortable for the user to wear.
The peak power output of active compliant parallel device 900 is also greater than the peak power output of a simple lever motor or passive spring. Actuating element 27 supplies more power during a gait cycle than is needed at the output (during push off), by storing energy in the spring over a relatively long time period (prior to push off) and subsequently releasing that energy over a relatively short time period (during push off). The increase in energy return by active compliant parallel device 900 results in improved device performance over other active or passive prostheses. Active compliant parallel device 900 returns a greater amount of energy during push off than the amount of energy put in by the user. The improved power output of the device results in less metabolic energy being required by the user to maintain a normal gait.
The efficiency of a DC motor is highly dependent on the motor torque. A lower peak torque requirement results in a lower peak power use by actuating element 27. A smaller motor is used for actuating element 27 because active compliant parallel device 900 has a lower peak power requirement. The more efficient energy usage also allows actuating element 27 i.e. the motor, to run cooler and allow for longer operation. Overall, the lower peak torque in active compliant parallel device 900 results in a higher performance prosthesis.
Active compliant parallel device 900 includes actuating element 27 and compliant element 28 disposed in parallel. The torque required from actuating element 27 of active compliant parallel device 900 is shown as line 70. Active compliant parallel device 900, shown at line 70 requires approximately 0.195 N-m of torque at push off.
An active compliant series mechanism differs from active compliant parallel device 900 in that the spring and motor are disposed in series between a base body and a movable body. The torque required by the motor in a series mechanism is shown at line 72. An active compliant series mechanism, shown as line 72, requires approximately 0.266 N-m of torque at push off. The peak torque of active compliant parallel device 900, at line 70, is lower than the peak torque of the series mechanism, at line 72. A similar angular velocity is achieved by active compliant parallel device 900 as is achieved by the series mechanism. Therefore, active compliant parallel device 900 achieves a similar velocity as the series mechanism, but requires less peak torque to reach that similar velocity. A smaller motor is used for active compliant parallel device 900 than is used for the series mechanism to achieve a similar gait speed. Active compliant parallel device 900 is lighter in weight than current devices and provides greater power and improved gait performance.
Efficiency of a DC motor is less dependent on the angular velocity of the motor, and is much more dependent on motor torque. Further, a DC motor operates at peak efficiency over a relatively narrow window of torque. The lower peak torque requirement from actuating element 27 of active compliant parallel device 900 results in more efficient operation of actuating element 27 and results in a higher performance prosthesis. Actuating element 27 operates within more favorable torque and velocity zones compared to a direct drive system. Therefore, the DC motor operates closer to peak efficiency. An average efficiency of actuating element 27 is approximately 80% within active compliant parallel device 900 because actuating element 27 operates closer to the optimal operating velocity and torque. Active compliant parallel device 900 also provides greater impulse tolerance and increased force fidelity over direct drive systems. Increasing the efficiency of actuating element 27 also improves the overall efficiency of active compliant parallel device 900.
Active compliant parallel device 900 is employed in a variety of applications. Some application examples include fields that require actuation of joints for locomotion, necessitate high force and speed from lightweight devices, require actuation of arms, hands, legs, or feet, and fields using devices that have robotic end effectors which interact with unstructured or unpredictable environments. In addition, the devices may be utilized in any field where the storing and releasing of potential energy in a compliant component, such as a spring, is necessary.
Movable body 125 is linked to base body 126 by passive linking member 129, actuating linking member 131, and actuating linking member 132. Actuating linking members 131 and 132 are disposed in parallel between movable body 125 and base body 126. Actuating linking members 131 and 132, movable body 125, base body 126, and passive linking member 129 constitute the parallel mechanism of parallel actuator device 120. Actuating linking member 132 includes actuating element 127, which can be a controllable position actuator or a force type actuator, such as an electric motor and lead screw or ball screw, hydraulic, pneumatic, direct-drive, series-elastic, electroactive polymer-based, chemical-based, or other actuation scheme. Actuating linking member 131 includes actuating element 128, which can also be a controllable position actuator or a force type actuator, such as an electric motor and lead screw or ball screw, hydraulic, pneumatic, direct-drive, series-elastic, electroactive polymer-based, chemical-based, or other actuation scheme.
Base body 126 is the fixed portion of parallel actuator device 120 to which the movable members are attached. Base body 126 is fixed with respect to the user, while the device as a whole is wearable and portable. Passive linking member 129 and actuating linking members 131 and 132 link movable body 125 to base body 126 by means of joints or revolute joints 130a-130f, which each have an axis that is normal to the plane of the figure. Revolute joints 130a-130f provide for rotational coupling. For example, movable body 125 is rotationally coupled to passive linking member 129 and to actuating linking members 131 and 132. Passive linking member 129 and actuating linking members 131 and 132 are rotationally coupled to base body 126. Alternatively, joints 130a-130f are prismatic joints, screw-type joints, or another joint type.
Actuating element 127 of actuating linking member 132 is coupled to base body 126 at revolute joint 130a and is coupled to movable body 125 at revolute joint 130b. Actuating linking member 132 couples base body 126 to movable body 125 at revolute joints 131a and 131b. Revolute joint 131a is disposed in a fixed position on base body 126. Actuating element 128 of actuating linking member 131 is coupled to base body 126 at revolute joint 130c and is coupled to movable body 125 at revolute joint 130d. Thus, actuating linking member 131 couples base body 126 to movable body 125 at revolute joints 130c and 130d. Revolute joint 130c is disposed in a fixed position on base body 126. Movable body 125 is also coupled to base body 126 by passive linking member 129. Passive linking member 129 is coupled to movable body 125 at revolute joint 130e and is coupled to base body 126 at revolute joint 130f. Revolute joint 130f is disposed in a fixed position on base body 126.
Actuating elements 127 and 128 are DC motors with a gear ratio optimized for efficient use of power during actuation. Actuating elements 127 and 128 work in parallel to mimic the action of the muscles, tendons, and ligaments at work in a human hip or knee joint. Actuating elements 127 and 128 are contained in a housing 140 of the prosthetic device. Housing 140 of the knee or hip prosthesis includes a socket or couples to a socket, which fits onto a residual limb of the user. The user inputs forces through housing 140 acting on parallel actuator device 120. Housing 140 is fixed with respect to base body 126 and comprises part of base body 126. Base body 126 encompasses the portions of parallel actuator device 120 which are fixed together within the device.
Parallel actuator device 120 is used to supplement or replace various joints within the human body. Parallel actuator device 120 is shown incorporated into a hip prosthesis. However, parallel actuator device 120 is also used in other lower leg prosthetic devices, such as the knee and ankle. Parallel actuator device 120 is also adaptable for upper body prosthetics, such as the shoulder, elbow, wrist, or fingers. As shown in
To mimic the human quadricep muscle, the velocities of actuating elements 127 and 128 are selected to move movable body 125 and passive linking member 129. Actuating elements 127 and 128 are controlled by a system that determines the velocities of actuating elements 127 and 128 based on algorithms designed to match human movement. Actuating element 127 pulls on movable body 125 at revolute joint 130b, shortening actuating linking member 132, to change the position of movable body 125. Actuating element 128 pushes on movable body 125 at revolute joint 130d, lengthening actuating linking member 131, to assist actuating element 127 in moving movable body 125. The output of both actuating elements 127 and 128 causes the movement of movable body 125 and passive linking member 129. In one embodiment, actuating linking member 132 has a length that is greater than the length of actuating linking member 131. Parallel actuator device 120 requires a higher velocity from actuating element 127 in order to move movable body 125 than the velocity required from actuating element 128. Both actuating elements 127 and 128 engage in opposite directions to move passive linking member 129. For example, actuating element 127 pulls on movable body 125 and actuating element 128 pushes on movable body 125. The velocity of actuating element 127 is higher than the velocity of actuating element 128 during stance phase. In one embodiment, actuating element 128 is inactive during stance phase, and actuating element 127 engages to pull movable body 125 and passive linking member 129 into position. In another embodiment, actuating element 128 engages to position actuating linking member 131 and movable body 125 in preparation for swing phase.
Passive linking member 129, which is coupled to movable body 125 at revolute joint 130e, rotates as actuating elements 127 and 128 engage to shorten actuating linking member 132 and to lengthen actuating linking member 131. Passive linking member 129 is rotationally affixed to base body 126 at revolute joint 130f. Passive linking member 129 moves in the posterior direction around revolute joint 130f with respect to base body 126. The posterior rotation of passive linking member 129 represents hip extension and the push off phase of gait.
Actuating elements 127 and 128 acting in parallel on movable body 125 to move passive linking member 129 gives parallel actuator device 120 kinematic redundancy. Parallel actuator device 120 includes one revolute output degree of freedom and a kinematic redundancy rate of one. Kinematic redundancy refers to the number of degrees of freedom at the input in excess of the degrees of freedom at the output necessary to complete a given task. The extra degree of freedom for parallel actuator device 120 is achieved through the design layout of revolute joints 131a -130f , actuating linking members 131 and 132, movable body 125, and passive linking member 129. Therefore, parallel actuator device 120 constitutes a parallel kinematically redundant mechanism or device. Combining actuating elements 127 and 128 in parallel between base body 126 and movable body 125 allows parallel actuator device 120 to be designed with passive linking member 129 as the end effector or working element, rather than with movable body 125 as the end effector. The benefit of the parallel kinematically redundant design is that the desired output position of passive linking member 129 is achievable with many different combinations of input positions. Actuating elements 127 and 128 are used to change the internal geometry of parallel actuator device 120 without changing the output position of passive linking member 129. The result is that the output force and velocity for parallel actuator device 120 is less dependent upon the input position of the device. Parallel actuator device 120 performs with high velocity or with high force independent of the starting position for the device. The velocity of actuating elements 127 and 128 is selected to produce a force-velocity relationship that better mimics a human muscle than single actuator designs.
The input positions of parallel actuator device 120 are determined by measuring the length actuating linking members 131 and 132 either directly or indirectly. In one embodiment, actuating elements 127 and 128 are screw-type motors encoded to count the number of rotations of the motors and to calculate the length of actuating linking members 131 and 132. Alternatively, sensors are disposed on one or more joints or linking members of parallel actuator device 120 to measure the input positions of actuating linking members 131 and 132. In an implementation of parallel actuator device 120 for an orthotic device, sensors may be disposed on a limb of the user and on the device. The input positions of parallel actuator device 120 are denoted by variables (9).
x=[x1, x2]T (9)
where: x1 is the length of actuating linking member 132
x2 is the length of actuating linking member 131
Alternatively, parallel actuator device 120 includes one or more additional compliant members, linking members, damping members, or passive members coupled to base body 126 and movable body 125. The input positions of an alternative parallel actuator mechanism including additional linking members are denoted by variables (10).
x=[x1, x2, x3 . . . ]T (10)
The output position of parallel actuator device 120 is measured using a sensor disposed on revolute joint 130f to measure the rotation or angle of passive linking member 129. Alternatively, the output position may be measured directly or indirectly by sensors disposed on one or more joints or linking members of parallel actuator device 120. The output position of passive linking member 129 in parallel actuator device 120 is denoted as y.
Alternatively, parallel actuator device 120 includes one or more additional linking members as outputs. For an alternative parallel actuator mechanism including additional outputs, the output positions may be the angle or length of an output joint and are denoted by variables (11).
y=[y1, y2, y3 . . . ]T (11)
The output position, y, of parallel actuator device 120 is written as a function of the input positions, x1 and x2. Alternatively, parallel actuator device 120 includes one or more additional inputs or outputs. For an alternative parallel actuator mechanism including additional inputs and outputs, the output position is written as a function of the input positions generally in equation (12).
y=[y1(x1, x2, . . . ) y2(x1, x2, . . . ) y3(x1, x2, . . . ) . . . ]T (12)
The output velocity is written as a function of the input velocity by taking the time derivative of the input and output positions, resulting in a matrix known as the Jacobian denoted by J in equation (13). The Jacobian is found by writing the function defining the output position of parallel actuator device 120 as a function of the input positions. The partial derivative of each output position is taken with respect to each input position.
For a kinematically redundant system such as parallel actuator device 120, the number of inputs, represented by n, is greater than the number of outputs, represented by m. In one embodiment, parallel actuator device 120 has one extra degree of freedom at the input. The extra degree of freedom allows the internal geometry of parallel actuator device 120 to be controlled and the transmission ratio of actuating elements 127 and 128 to be adjusted. In another embodiment, parallel actuator device 120 has an additional degree of freedom to make a biarticular device. For example, parallel actuator device 120 moves in the sagittal plane and in the coronal plane such that the device includes two directions of motion.
The input velocities of actuating elements 127 and 128 are related to the output velocity of parallel actuator device 120 by equation (14).
where: {dot over (x)}1 is the input velocity of actuating element 127
{dot over (x)}2 is the input velocity of actuating element 128
{dot over (y)} is the output velocity of passive linking member 129
The power input of actuating elements 127 and 128 equals the power output of parallel actuator device 120 and is shown with equation (15).
Fy {dot over (y)}=F1 {dot over (x)}1+F2 {dot over (x)}2 (15)
where: F1 is the input force of actuating element 127
F2 is the input force of actuating element 128
Fy is the output force of passive linking member 129
Equation (14) and equation (15) are used to determine the force-velocity relationship of actuating elements 127 and 128 to calculate the output force-velocity relationship for parallel actuator device 120.
A single actuator used in a powered prosthetic device, such as in a lever motor design, has a linear force-velocity relationship. Line 162 shows an example of a single DC motor used in a lever motor design. The approximate force-velocity relationship of the single motor, shown by line 162, indicates the motor velocity and force have a linear relationship. Line 164 shows an approximate force-velocity relationship of a larger single DC motor or multiple smaller DC motors combined in series. The force-velocity relationships of the smaller motor (line 162) and larger motor (line 164) show that a larger motor provides higher force and velocity, but the force-velocity relationship remains linear.
Skeletal muscle performs with high stall force and high velocity, with a force-velocity curve taking the form of a rectangular hyperbola. If a single motor is selected with the same peak power as a muscle, the motor will have a lower stall force and a lower maximum velocity than the muscle. If a motor is selected with the same stall load and maximum velocity as a muscle, the motor will have a higher peak power and will need to be a much larger motor, and therefore, a much heavier motor. A heavier motor in a prosthetic device is undesirable, because the weight of the motor becomes too heavy for the user to wear.
Parallel actuator device 120 combines actuating elements 127 and 128 in a kinematically redundant parallel arrangement to produce a force-velocity relationship that behaves more similarly to a human skeletal muscle. The force-velocity curve, shown as line 160, for parallel actuator device 120 is achieved by the extra degree of freedom at the input. The extra degree of freedom within parallel actuator device 120 allows the position of movable body 125 to be selected to control the input to output transmission ratio of parallel actuator device 120. Passive linking member 129 is coupled to movable body 125 such that a particular output velocity and force measured at passive linking member 129 is available for many different input positions of movable body 125. The internal geometry of parallel actuator device 120 is selected to combine actuating elements 127 and 128 to provide, for example, high force at low velocity or high velocity at low load. The benefit of selecting a geometry and a force-velocity curve with high force at low velocity is that parallel actuator device 120 performs heavy lifting at low speeds, for example, when the user stands up from a sitting position. Parallel actuator device 120 with internal geometry and a force-velocity curve with high velocity at low load allows the user to move quickly, such as when running. Therefore, parallel actuator device 120 performs well over an increased range of velocity and force and more like a human skeletal muscle compared to a single motor having a similar power.
The force-velocity curve of skeletal muscle changes with output position as the muscle fiber length deviates shorter or longer than optimal. Accordingly, skeletal muscle performance is highly dependent on joint position. In contrast, parallel actuator device 120 performance is independent of output position. Parallel actuator device 120 performance is largely independent of the output position of passive linking member 129. Therefore, the independent nature of motor torque and shaft angle for actuating elements 127 and 128 allows for the force-velocity performance of parallel actuator device 120 to exceed that of skeletal muscle. Another advantage of parallel actuator device 120 is that the device is still able to function as a lever motor if one of actuating elements 127 or 128 fails. Either actuating element 127 or actuating element 128 actuates to move passive linking member 129 in both the hip extension and hip flexion directions.
Unlike a single motor system with a linear force-velocity curve, parallel actuator device 120 with a non-linear force-velocity curve achieves a higher force and higher velocity with a lower peak power requirement. For example, parallel actuator device 120 has actuating elements 127 and 128 disposed in parallel where each actuating element 127 and 128 includes a 150 W DC motor. Parallel actuator device 120 achieves both a higher force and a higher velocity than a lever motor design having a single 300 W DC motor. A single motor would need to be approximately five to ten times larger than the motors in parallel actuator device 120 to produce a similar force and velocity output as parallel actuator device 120. Therefore, the single motor would be much heavier and have a greater inertia than actuating element 127 and 128 of parallel actuator device 120. A user would have difficulty moving the heavier motor, which would reduce the velocity available to the user by simply being too heavy to move quickly. Because smaller motors are used in parallel actuator device 120, the prosthetic device is lighter in weight and is more comfortable for the user. A lighter weight mechanism is also more efficient than heavier designs and further improves the performance of the prosthetic device.
Like active compliant parallel device 900 parallel actuator device 120 is employed in a variety of applications. Parallel actuator device 120 can be applied to prosthetic, orthotic, or robotic devices that require actuation of joints for locomotion, necessitate high force and speed from lightweight devices, or require actuation of a limb. Parallel actuator device 120 applies to fields using devices that have robotic end effectors, which interact with unstructured or unpredictable environments.
While one or more embodiments of the present invention have been illustrated in detail, the skilled artisan will appreciate that modifications and adaptations to those embodiments may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention as set forth in the following claims.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/081,857, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,532,877, filed Nov. 15, 2013, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/673,177, filed Nov. 9, 2012, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/558,761, filed Nov. 11, 2011, which applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
909859 | Apgar | Jan 1909 | A |
2475373 | Catranis | Jul 1949 | A |
2568051 | Catranis | Sep 1951 | A |
3045247 | Bair | Jul 1962 | A |
3557387 | Ohlenbusch et al. | Jan 1971 | A |
3589134 | Hackmann | Jun 1971 | A |
3871032 | Karas | Mar 1975 | A |
3953900 | Thompson | May 1976 | A |
3995324 | Burch | Dec 1976 | A |
4030141 | Graupe | Jun 1977 | A |
4209860 | Graupe | Jul 1980 | A |
4387472 | Wilson | Jun 1983 | A |
4488320 | Wilson | Dec 1984 | A |
4579558 | Ramer | Apr 1986 | A |
4652266 | Truesdell | Mar 1987 | A |
4776852 | Rubic | Oct 1988 | A |
4805455 | DelGiorno et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
5020790 | Beard et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5062673 | Mimura | Nov 1991 | A |
5101472 | Repperger | Mar 1992 | A |
5156630 | Rappoport et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5201772 | Maxwell | Apr 1993 | A |
5246465 | Rincoe et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5252102 | Singer et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5252901 | Ozawa et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5282460 | Boldt | Feb 1994 | A |
5376138 | Bouchard et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5376141 | Phillips | Dec 1994 | A |
5383939 | James | Jan 1995 | A |
5413611 | Haslam, II et al. | May 1995 | A |
5425780 | Flatt et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5430643 | Seraji | Jul 1995 | A |
5443528 | Allen | Aug 1995 | A |
5455497 | Hirose et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5484389 | Stark et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5571205 | James | Nov 1996 | A |
5650704 | Pratt et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5662693 | Johnson et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5695527 | Allen | Dec 1997 | A |
5800570 | Collier | Sep 1998 | A |
5888212 | Petrofsky et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5888213 | Sears et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5893891 | Zahedi | Apr 1999 | A |
5929332 | Brown | Jul 1999 | A |
5948021 | Radcliffe | Sep 1999 | A |
5954621 | Joutras et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5957981 | Gramnaes | Sep 1999 | A |
5984972 | Huston et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6029374 | Herr et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6086616 | Okuda et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6091977 | Tarjan et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6117177 | Chen et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6122960 | Hutchings et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6129766 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6187052 | Molino et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6206932 | Johnson | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6378190 | Akeel | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6379393 | Mavroidis et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6423098 | Biedermann | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6436149 | Rincoe | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6443993 | Koniuk | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6494039 | Pratt et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6500210 | Sabolich et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6513381 | Fyfe et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6517585 | Zahedi et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6517858 | Le Moel et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6522266 | Soehren et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6543987 | Ehrat | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6587728 | Fang et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6610101 | Herr et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6613097 | Cooper | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6645252 | Asai et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6679920 | Biedermann et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6695885 | Schulman et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6704024 | Robotham et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6704582 | Le-Faucheur et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6719807 | Harris | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6755870 | Biedermann et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6761743 | Johnson | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6764520 | Deffenbaugh et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6764521 | Molino et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6767370 | Mosler et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6813582 | Levi et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6824569 | Okediji | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6863695 | Doddroe et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6875241 | Christensen | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6908488 | Paasivaara et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6910331 | Asai et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6955692 | Grundei | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6966882 | Horst | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6969408 | Lecomte et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7029500 | Martin | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7066964 | Wild | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7112938 | Takenaka et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7118601 | Yasui et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7137998 | Bédard et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7147667 | Bédard et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7150762 | Caspers | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7164967 | Etienne-Cummings et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7182738 | Bonutti et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7209788 | Nicolelis et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7279009 | Herr et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7295892 | Herr et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7300240 | Brogardh | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7308333 | Kern et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7313463 | Herr et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7314490 | Bédard et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7381192 | Brodard et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7396337 | McBean et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7410471 | Campbell et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7431737 | Ragnarsdottir et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7455696 | Bisbee, III et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7462201 | Christensen | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7485152 | Haynes et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7520904 | Christensen | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7531006 | Clausen et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7552664 | Bulatowicz | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7575602 | Amirouche et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7578799 | Thorsteinsson et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7637957 | Ragnarsdottir et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7637959 | Clausen et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7655050 | Palmer et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7691154 | Asgeirsson et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7736394 | Bédard et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7799091 | Herr et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7811333 | Jonsson et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7811334 | Ragnarsdottir et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7815689 | Bédard et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7867284 | Bédard et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7896927 | Clausen | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7918808 | Simmons | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7942935 | Iversen et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7955398 | Bédard et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7985265 | Moser et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7992849 | Sugar et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8011229 | Lieberman et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8048007 | Roy | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8048172 | Jonsson et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8057550 | Clausen et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8075633 | Herr et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8083807 | Auberger et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8109890 | Kamiar et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8142370 | Weinberg et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8202325 | Albrecht-Laatsch et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8231687 | Bédard et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8287477 | Herr et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8322695 | Sugar et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8323354 | Bédard et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8376971 | Herr et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8403997 | Sykes et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8419804 | Herr et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8435309 | Gilbert et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8480760 | Hansen et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8500823 | Herr et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8500825 | Christensen et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8512415 | Herr et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8551184 | Herr | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8601897 | Lauzier et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8617254 | Bisbee, III et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8657886 | Clausen et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8696764 | Hansen et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8702811 | Ragnarsdottir et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
7896927 | Clausen et al. | May 2014 | C1 |
8716877 | Sugar et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8734528 | Herr et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8764850 | Hanset et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8790282 | Jung et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8801802 | Oddsson et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8814949 | Gramnaes | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8852292 | Ragnarsdottir et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8864846 | Herr et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8870967 | Herr et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8986397 | Bédard et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9032635 | Herr et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9044346 | Langlois et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9060883 | Herr et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9060884 | Langlois | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9066819 | Gramnaes | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9078774 | Jónsson et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9114029 | Ásgeirsson | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9221177 | Herr et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9271851 | Claussen et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9289316 | Ward et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9345591 | Bisbee, III et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9345592 | Herr et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9351856 | Herr et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9358137 | Bédard et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9459698 | Lee | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9462966 | Clausen et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9498401 | Herr et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9526635 | Gilbert et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9526636 | Bédard et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9532877 | Holgate | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9554922 | Casler et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9561118 | Clausen et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9604368 | Holgate | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9622884 | Holgate et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9649206 | Bédard | May 2017 | B2 |
9682005 | Herr et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9687377 | Han et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9707104 | Clausen | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9717606 | Gramnaes | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9737419 | Herr et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9808357 | Langlois | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9839552 | Han et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9895240 | Langlois et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
10137011 | Herr et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10195057 | Clausen | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10251762 | Langlois | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10299943 | Clausen et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10307271 | Holgate et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10369019 | Clausen et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
20020007690 | Song et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020079857 | Ishii et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030005786 | Stuart et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040064195 | Herr | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078299 | Down-Logan et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040153484 | Unno | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050049719 | Wilson | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050049721 | Sulprizio | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050070834 | Herr et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050107889 | Bédard et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113973 | Endo et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050119763 | Christensen | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137717 | Gramnaes | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050166685 | Boiten | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050216097 | Rifkin | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050283257 | Bisbee et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060025959 | Gomez et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041321 | Christensen | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060046907 | Rastegar et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069336 | Krebs et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069448 | Yasui | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060184280 | Oddsson et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060189899 | Flaherty et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060249315 | Herr et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259153 | Harn et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060260620 | Kazerooni et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070043449 | Herr et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070061016 | Kuo et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070123997 | Herr et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070129653 | Sugar et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070162152 | Herr et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080004718 | Mosler | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080033578 | Christensen | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046096 | Bédard et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080058668 | Seyed Momen et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080141813 | Ehrat | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080262635 | Moser et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080306612 | Mosler | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090030530 | Martin | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090088912 | Rajaraman | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090192625 | Boiten | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090204229 | Mosley et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090204230 | Kaltenborn et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090265018 | Goldfarb et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100023133 | Fairbanks et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100042228 | Doddroe et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100094431 | Albrecht-Laatsch | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100113980 | Herr et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100114329 | Casler et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131101 | Engeberg et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100161077 | Boone et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100174384 | Herr et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100185301 | Hansen et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100241242 | Herr et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100275718 | Stuart et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110015761 | Celebi et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110082566 | Herr et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110106274 | Ragnarsdottir et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110126660 | Lauzier et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110132131 | Worz | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110137429 | Bédard et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110166674 | Montmartin | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110196509 | Jansen et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110202144 | Palmer et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110208322 | Rifkin et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110295384 | Herr et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110295385 | Herr et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120078415 | Kubo et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120130508 | Harris et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120153875 | Glaister | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120203359 | Schimmels et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120209405 | Herr et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120226364 | Kampas et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120259430 | Han et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120283845 | Herr et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120330439 | Goldfarb et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130006386 | Hansen et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130035769 | Bédard et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130046218 | Wiggin et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130142608 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130173022 | Arabian et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130218295 | Holgate et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130218298 | Mosler | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130282141 | Herr et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130310979 | Herr et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140039642 | Nijiman et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140088730 | Hansen et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140114437 | Herr et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140121782 | Herr et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140191522 | Birglen | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20150032225 | Oddsson et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150073566 | Ragnarsdottir et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150127118 | Herr et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150164661 | Ragnarsdottir et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150209214 | Herr et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150265429 | Jónsson et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150328020 | Clausen et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160158031 | Ward et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160158032 | Ward et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160302956 | Gilbert et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170241497 | Mooney et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170304083 | Clausen | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20180125678 | Langlois | May 2018 | A1 |
20180177618 | Langlois | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20190175369 | Langlois | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190224026 | Clausen | Jul 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
543 277 | Dec 1973 | CH |
2043873 | Sep 1989 | CN |
1215614 | May 1999 | CN |
2400072 | Oct 2000 | CN |
2776340 | May 2006 | CN |
3923057 | Jan 1991 | DE |
42 29 330 | Mar 1994 | DE |
0 358 056 | Mar 1990 | EP |
0 380 060 | Aug 1990 | EP |
0 718 951 | Jun 1996 | EP |
1 107 420 | Jun 2001 | EP |
1 169 982 | Jan 2002 | EP |
1 410 780 | Apr 2004 | EP |
1 442 704 | Aug 2004 | EP |
1 547 567 | Jun 2005 | EP |
1 718 252 | Nov 2006 | EP |
1 792 597 | Jun 2007 | EP |
2 564 817 | Mar 2013 | EP |
2 702 963 | Mar 2014 | EP |
2 816 463 | May 2002 | FR |
2 201 260 | Aug 1988 | GB |
2 228 201 | Aug 1990 | GB |
2 260 495 | Apr 1993 | GB |
2 301 776 | Dec 1996 | GB |
2 302 949 | Feb 1997 | GB |
2 367 753 | Apr 2002 | GB |
59-032453 | Feb 1984 | JP |
59-071747 | Apr 1984 | JP |
59-088147 | May 1984 | JP |
59-189843 | Oct 1984 | JP |
60-177102 | Sep 1985 | JP |
05-123348 | May 1993 | JP |
05-161668 | Jun 1993 | JP |
07-024766 | Jan 1995 | JP |
11-215793 | Aug 1999 | JP |
2002-191654 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2005-536317 | Dec 2005 | JP |
2009-153660 | Jul 2009 | JP |
2002-0041137 | Jun 2002 | KR |
1447366 | Dec 1988 | SU |
1731210 | May 1992 | SU |
WO 94009727 | May 1994 | WO |
WO 96041599 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO 97027822 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO 00027318 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 03003953 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 03088373 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 2004017890 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2006024876 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO 2006076164 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO 2007025116 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO 2007095933 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO 2008080231 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO 2010027968 | Mar 2010 | WO |
2011005482 | Jan 2011 | WO |
2011096965 | Aug 2011 | WO |
WO 2012062279 | May 2012 | WO |
2012091555 | Jul 2012 | WO |
WO 2013006585 | Jan 2013 | WO |
2013086035 | Jun 2013 | WO |
WO 2015157723 | Oct 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Au, Samuel K. et al., “Biomechanical Design of a Powered Ankle-Foot Prosthesis,” in Rehabilitation Robotics, 2007. ICORR 2007. IEEE 10th International Conference on, 2007, pp. 298-303. |
Au, Samuel K. et al., “Powered Ankle—Foot Prosthesis Improves Walking Metabolic Economy,” Robotics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 25, pp. 51-66, 2009. |
Au, Samuel K. et al., “Powered Ankle-Foot Prosthesis for the Improvement of Amputee Ambulation,” in Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2007. EMBS 2007. 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE, 2007, p. 3020. |
Au, Samuel K. et al. “Powered ankle-foot prosthesis to assist level-ground and stair-descent gaits,” Neural Networks, 21, 2008, pp. 654.666. |
Au, Samuel K. et al., “Powered ankle-foot prosthesis,” Robotics & Automation Magazine, IEEE, vol. 15, pp. 52-59, 2008. |
Au, Samuel K., “Powered Ankle-Foot Prosthesis for the Improvement of Amputee Walking Economy,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2007, pp. 1-108. |
Belforte, G. et. al., “Pneumatic Active Gait Orthosis”. Mechatronics 11, 2001, pp. 301-323. |
Bellman, Ryan D. et al., “SPARKy 3: Design of an Active Robotic Ankle Prosthesis with two Actuated Degrees of Freedom Using Regenerative Kinetics”, 2nd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, pp. 511-516, 2008. |
Bernardi, M. et al., (1995), “The Efficiency of Walking of Paraplegic Patients Using a Reciprocating Gait Orthosis,” Spinal Cord 33(7): 409-415. |
Boehler, Alexander W. et al., (2008), “Design, Implementation and Test Results of a Robust Control Algorithm for a Powered Ankle Foot Orthosis,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), IEEE. |
Colombo, Gery et. al., “Treadmill Training of Paraplegic Patients Using a Robotic Orthosis”, Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. vol. 37 No. 6., 2000, pp. 693-700. |
Farley, Claire et al., “Biomechanics of Walking and Running: Center of Mass Movements to Muscle Action,” Exerc Sport Sci Rev, vol. 26, pp. 253-285, 1998. |
Guiraud, D., “Application of an Artificial Neural Network to the Control of an Active External Orthosis of the Lower Limb”, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, Nov. 1994, vol. 32, pp. 610-614. |
Hansen, Andrew H. et al., “The Effects of Prosthetic Foot Roll-over Shape Arc Length on the Gait of Trans-tibial Prosthesis Users,” Prosthetics and Orthotics International, vol. 30, No. 3, 286-299, 2006. |
Hansen, Andrew H. et al., “The human ankle during walking: implications for design of biomimetic ankle prostheses and orthoses,” Journal of Biomechanics, 37(10): 1467-1474, 2004. |
Hansen, Andrew H. et al., “Prosthetic ankle-foot mechanism capable of automatic adaptation to the walking surface,” J Biomech Eng-T ASME, 131(3): 035002, 2009. |
Herr, Hugh et al., “Patient-Adaptive Prosthetic and Orthotic Leg Systems”, Proceedings of the International Federation for Medical & Biological Engineering, Reykjavik, Iceland, Jun. 18-22, 2002, pp. 18-21. |
Hitt, Joseph et al., “A Robotic Transtibial Prothesis with Regenerative Kinetics: The Design Analyses, Methods, and Testing”, U.S. Army Military Amputee Research Program, 2008. |
Hitt, Joseph et al., “An Active Foot-Ankle Prosthesis with Biomechanical Energy Regeneration”, Journal of Medical Devices,vol. 4, 2010. |
Hitt, Joseph et al., (2010), “Bionic Running for Unilateral Transtibial Military Amputees,” Proceedings of the 27th Army Science Conference, Orlando, FL. |
Hitt, Joseph et al., (2010), “Dismounted Soldier Biomechanical Power Regeneration Kit (SPaRK),” Proceedings of the 27th Army Science Conference, Orlando, FL. |
Hitt, Joseph et al., “Robotic Transtibial Prosthesis with Biomechanical Energy Regeneration”, Industrial Robot: An International Journal, vol. 36, Issue 5, pp. 441-447, 2009. |
Hitt, Joseph et al., “The SPARKy (Spring Ankle with Regenerative Kinetics) Project: Design and Analysis of a Robotic Transtibial Prosthesis with Regenerative Kinetics”, ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (IDET/CIE), CD-ROM, pp. 1-10, 2007. |
Holgate, Matthew A., “Control of a Robotic Transtibial Prosthesis”, A Dissertation, Arizona State University, Dec. 2009. |
Holgate, Matthew A. et al., “A Control Algorithm for a Prosthetic Ankle Using Phase Plane Invariants”, Poster presentation at Dynamic Walking, Vancouver, Canada, 2009. |
Holgate, Matthew A. et al., “A Novel Control Algorithm for Wearable Robotics Using Phase Plane Invariants”, International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2009. |
Holgate, Matthew A. et al., “Control Algorithms for Ankle Robots: A Reflection on the State-of-the-Art and Presentation of Two Novel Algorithms”, 2nd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, pp. 97-103, 2008. |
Holgate, Matthew A., “The SPARKy (Spring Ankle with Regenerative Kinetics) Project: Choosing a DC Motor Based Actuation Method” 2nd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, pp. 163-168, 2008. |
Hollander, Kevin W. et al., (2005), “A Robotic “Jack Spring” for Ankle Gait Assistance,” DETC2005-84492, ASME ntemational Design Engineering Technical Conference (IDETC2005), Long Beach, CA, American Society of Mechanical Engineers. |
Hollander, Kevin W. et al. “A Robust Control Concept for Robotic Ankle Gail Assistance,” IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), 2007, pp. 119-123. |
Hollander, Kevin W. et al., (2006), “An Efficient Robotic Tendon for Gait Assistance,” Journal of biomechanical engineering 128: 788. |
Kawamoto, Hiroaki et al., (2003), “Power Assist Method for HAL-3 Estimating Operator's Intention Based on Motion Information,” IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Millbrae, CA. |
Kazerooni, H. et al., (2005), “On the Control of the Berkeley Lower Extremity Exoskeleton (BLEEX),” Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Barcelona, Spain, Apr. 2005. |
Kyriakopoulos K. et al., “Minimum jerk path generation.” International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1:364-369, 1988. |
Norris, James A. et al., (2007), “Effect of Augmented Plantarflexion Power on Preferred Walking Speed and Economy in Young and Older Adults,” Gait & Posture 25(4): 620-627. |
Sawicki, Gregory S. et al., (2009), “It Pays to Have a Spring in your Step,” Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews 37(3). |
Sawicki, Gregory S. et al., (2009), “Mechanics and Energetics of Incline Walking with Robotic Ankle Exoskeletons,” Journal of Experimental Biology 212(1). |
Sawicki, Gregory S. et al., (2009), “Powered Ankle Exoskeletons Reveal the Metabolic Cost of Plantar Flexor Mechanical Work During Walking with Longer Steps at Constant Step Frequency,” Journal of Experimental Biology 212(1). |
Sugar, Thomas G., (2002), “A Novel Selective Compliant Actuator,” Mechatronics 12(9-10): 1157-1171. |
Sup, Frank. et al., “Design and control of an active electrical knee and ankle prosthesis,” in Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, 2008. BioRob 2008. 2nd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on, 2008, pp. 523-528. |
Walsh, Conor James et al., (2006), Biomimetic Design of an Under-Actuated Leg Exoskeleton for Load-Carrying Augmentation, Cambridge, MA, Massachusetts Inst of Tech, M.S. |
Walsh, Conor James et al., “Development of a Lightweight, Under-Actuated Exoskeleton for Load-Carrying Augmentation,” Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Orlando, Florida, May 2006. |
Ward, Jeffrey et al., (2008), “Control Architectures for a Powered Ankle Foot Orthsosis,” International Journal of Assistive Robotics and Mechatronics 9(2): 2-13. |
Ward, Jeffrey et al., (2007), “Robotic Gait Trainer Reliability and Stroke Patient Case Study,” IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), Holland. |
Ward, Jeffrey et al., (2010), “Stroke Survivor Gait Adaptation and Performance After Training on a Powered Ankle Foot Orthosis,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Anchorage, AK, IEEE. |
Ward, Jeffrey et al., (2011), “Using the Translational Potential Energy of Springs for Prosthetic Systems,” IEEE Multi-conference on Systems and Control, Denver, CO, IEEE. |
Au et al., “An EMG-Position Controlled System for an Active Ankle-Foot Prosthesis: An Initial Experimental Study,” Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Chicago, IL, Jun. 28-Jul. 1, 2005, pp. 375-379. |
Dietl et al., “Der Einsatz von Elektronik bei Prothesen zur Versorgung der unteren Extremität,” Med. Orth. Tech., 1997, vol. 117, pp. 31-35. |
DIGINFO TV, “Powered Prosthetic Thigh and Leg”, uploaded Nov. 7, 2008 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lgitTzNEd54&feature=youtu.be%3E [Screenshots retrieved Oct. 23, 2014 in 9 pages]. |
“Extension Spring Design Theory, Spring Rate of Extension Springs,” http://web.archive.org/web/20131209120508/http://springipedia.com/extension-design-theory.asp as archived Dec. 9, 2013 in 1 page. |
Ficanha et al., “A Two-Axis Cable-Driven Ankle-Foot Mechanism”, Robotics and Biometrics, 2014, vol. 1, No. 17, pp. 13. |
Flowers et al., “An Electrohydraulic Knee-Torque Controller for a Prosthesis Simulator,” Journal of Biomechanical Engineering: Transactions of the ASME; vol. 99, Series K, No. 1; Feb. 1977, pp. 3-8. |
Hollander et al., “Adjustable Robotic Tendon using a ‘Jack Spring’™”, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Jun. 28-Jul. 1, 2005, Chicago, IL, pp. 113-118. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application No. PCT/US2014/061913 dated Feb. 5, 2015 in 8 pages. |
Martinez-Villalpando et al., “Agonist-Antagonist Active Knee Prosthesis: A Preliminary Study in Level-Ground Walking”, Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 2009, vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 361-373. |
Mitchell et al., “Design and Development of Ankle-Foot Prosthesis with Delayed Release of Plantarflecion”, Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 2013, vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 409-422. |
Mooney et al., “Design and Characterization of a Biologically Inspired Quasi-Passive Prosthetic Ankle-Foot”, IEEE, 2014. |
Realmuto et al., “Nonlinear Passive Cam-Based Springs for Powered Angle Prostheses”, Journal of Medical Devices, Mar. 2015, vol. 9, pp. 011007-1-011007-10. |
Robinson et al., “Series Elastic Actuator Development for a Biomimetic Walking Robot,” MIT Leg Laboratory, 1999, pp. 1-8. |
Townsend et al., “Biomechanics and Modeling of Bipedal Climbing and Descending,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 9, No. 4, 1976, pp. 227-239. |
Vanderborght et al., “MACCEPA 2.0: Adjustable Compliant Actuator with Stiffening Characteristic for Energy Efficient Hopping”, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Kobe International Conference Center, Kobe, Japan, May 12-17, 2009, pp. 544-549. |
Wang et al., “Walk the Walk”, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, Aug. 26, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170095355 A1 | Apr 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61558761 | Nov 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14081857 | Nov 2013 | US |
Child | 15379815 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13673177 | Nov 2012 | US |
Child | 14081857 | US |