1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to a robotic irrigator device and a method for irrigating lawns and other vegetation, specifically to an automated mobile device both with and without a water supply hose, and a method for making even passes over the irrigated area so that water is uniformly and efficiently distributed.
2. Description of Related Art
Robotic mobile irrigation devices have been described previously in U.S. Pat. No. 8,989,907, U.S. Pat. No. 2,563,519, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/742,387 and U.S. Provisional Application 14742387.
The primary challenge with a robotic irrigation device is accurate and reliable navigation around the area to be irrigated. There are four main navigation problems to solve:
First the irrigation device must precisely locate the water refill station in order to transfer water from the refill station into a tank without waste.
Second, the irrigation device must stay within the perimeter of the area. This is particularly important to avoid dispensing water on paved surfaces.
Third, the irrigation devices must dispense water with minimal gaps or overlap between adjacent passes over an area.
Fourth, where the irrigation device is connected to a hose, there are specific challenges to managing the hose. The primary issue is hose management, that is ensuring the hose does not get twisted, kinked, or entrapped by the robot. The secondary issue is the length and weight of the hose when filled with water. The irrigator device must be able to pull and/or move the hose with sufficient ease to cover the entire area. A standard garden hose, 100 feet long with ⅝-inch internal diameter, weighs approximately 12 lbs. when empty and 25 lb. when full with water.
Travelling sprinklers that follow a garden hose have been described previously in U.S. Pat. No. 2,563,519 etc. These devices connect to a hose and employ various means to follow the hose to a stopping point. Travelling sprinklers use a rotating or oscillating sprinkler to distribute water and require sufficient flow rate to operate properly. Additionally, the travelling irrigator has the same water distribution issues as a fixed sprinkler. Neither device is capable of accurately irrigating areas without overspray or underspray.
Problems one and two can be resolved by various means including a perimeter wire, as commonly used with robotic lawn mowing equipment, or with cameras as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/742,387. The third navigation element is particularly challenging. Once the irrigation device moves away from a boundary, a fixed reference point is lost and errors in position increase proportionally to the distance travelled and the number of turns or other direction changes.
If there is a gap between irrigation paths, there will be insufficient water in the gaps, which is a particular problem with certain turf grasses. The overall water volume can be increased to compensate for potential gaps which will, depending on the type of vegetation and soil, at least partially address the issue but at a cost of reduced irrigation efficiency.
A navigation strategy which deliberately includes overlaps is another option. Making multiple passes that overlap according to the degree of navigational accuracy will ensure no areas are omitted. An improved variation of this is making passes in two or more directions. For example, north-south then east-west. With a sufficient number of passes over the entire area, preferably in different directions, the irrigation device can achieve a sufficiently even water distribution. The significant problem with this approach is that the total distance travelled is substantially increased which, due primarily to the mass of the water payload, increases the energy requirements and consequently the battery size or other power storage method. It is also desirable to make as few passes over the area as possible in order to avoid damage to the lawn or other vegetation.
The target accuracy for effective irrigation in a single pass is on the order of +/−1″. Given an irrigation device with an irrigation path width of 20″, a planned overlap of 1″ will result in just 5% irrigation variation from ideal.
GNSS/GPS is does not offer sufficient accuracy (+/−2 meters best case). Real Time Kinematic (RTK) GPS can achieve sufficient accuracy but is complex, and requires the installation of a fixed base station.
Thus there is a need for a means to reliably and inexpensively navigate within an irrigation area so that irrigation paths do not overlap or have gaps.
There is additionally the need for an irrigator device with water supply hose that is able to navigate a lawn or planted area and autonomously. Said device should not spray or sprinkle water over distance. Said device should have a navigation method that achieves the hose management requirement and area coverage in the simplest means possible so that a simple and robust control circuit is sufficient.
A device for sensing the damp edge of an irrigated area such that a mobile irrigator can make multiple adjacent passes over an area without significant overlap or gaps between each passes. The moisture sensing device measures the residual surface and vegetal moisture from a prior irrigation pass in order to determine the position of the current irrigation run.
A method for optimally navigating from a refill station over the irrigated area utilizing the boundary of the area and the damp edge from the prior irrigation pass, so that the mobile irrigator can evenly irrigate an area without complex or expensive sensor technologies.
A device for irrigating a lawn using water supplied by an attached hose, so that refilling of a tank is not required, and the device can manage the hose while proving even water distribution using nozzles directed at the ground within the approximate footprint of the device. The device may have wheels driven by electric motors, a control module, a water valve, a flow sensor, surface moisture sensors, and a hose connected to water source.
A method for navigating an irregular lawn area by an irrigation device with an attached hose, has the steps, locating the perimeter, apply a small amount of water as a start marker, navigating the entire perimeter to collect data, returning to the start marker, making alternating clockwise then counterclockwise irrigation passes, detecting complete irrigation of an area, and searching for unirrigated areas.
A device and method for evenly applying water independent of flow and pressure changes due to hose length and other variables. The device may have a water valve, flow sensor, variable speed motors driving wheels for locomotion, and a microcontroller for implementing the control algorithm.
A device and method for adjusting water distribution based on surface moisture sensing so that a mobile irrigation device can automatically apply additional water to very dry areas without the restriction of predefined zones.
The following drawings form part of the present specification and are included to further demonstrate certain aspects of the present invention. The invention may be better understood by reference to one or more of these drawings in combination with the detailed description of the specification embodiments presented herein.
Embodiments are directed to devices, systems, and methods for irrigating soil for lawns, gardens, crops, and around trees. Certain embodiments are directed to a robotic irrigator capable of autonomously navigating a lawn while irrigating evenly. In certain aspects the robotic irrigator is capable of one or more tasks that include, but are not limited to sensing soil surface moisture and grass moisture.
The moisture sensing device measures the residual surface and vegetal moisture from a prior irrigation pass in order to determine the position of the current irrigation run. By accurately positioning each pass across the irrigated area, water is conserved and under-watering is avoided.
The invention may include an integral water tank which the robotic irrigator automatically refills by returning to a refill station.
The robotic irrigator may also be connected to a supply hose. In this embodiment, the irrigator employs a method of navigation such that the connected supply hose does not become tangled or coiled.
The invention additionally uses surface moisture readings and water flow rate information to adjust the rate of travel of the irrigator so that optimal water is applied to each area.
The mobile irrigator is equipped with means to determine and navigate the boundary 12 of the irrigated area. This means may consist of a perimeter wire carrying an electrical signal, cameras or sensors to detect the edge of the planted area, or similar means. Perimeter sensing is commonly used as a means to find the refill station and to navigate from the refill station to the area to be irrigated. As previously discussed the problem is making multiple irrigation runs while avoiding overlap or gaps. As the irrigator moves away from perimeter 12 the cumulative errors in calculated position versus actual position increase due to a variety of factors including uneven terrain, slip in the wheels and compass tolerances.
As the irrigator moves, the contacts make intermittent contact with the grass and soil. The software measures the minimum resistance detected in each sampling interval to exclude intermittent contact events and also the mean resistance value to give a useful representation of the surface moisture.
The end of the probe 13 may be a hemisphere, ball or curved surface to avoid catching on the grass and to probe a reliable electrical contact. Probes may also be combined into a one or more groups mounted on a common insulating substrate. Multiple pairs of probes allow the robotic irrigator to more accurately detect the transition from wet grass to dry gas and also to run along a wet-dry transition at a fixed offset distance.
The circuit in
The microcontroller connected to node 37A 37B should periodically swap the functions of nodes 37A 37B in order to apply an AC signal to the probes so that corrosion is reduced compared to a DC signal.
The probes may make intermittent contact with the grass. The microcontroller may employ means to filter sudden changes in electrical resistance. Methods include a simple averaging filter or a windowed peak detect where the microcontroller looks for the lowest resistance over a period. The sampling period is proportional to the velocity of the mobile irrigator.
The graph in
As described previously, the irrigator uses the wet-dry measurement region to direct navigation. Additionally, the moisture probes detect the relative dryness of turf areas. Very dry areas, for example those in full sun, will have higher surface resistance than those in the shade. Using these relative data points, the water depth is then adjusted up or down to compensate. Watering amounts might be adjusted by a pre-set value, for example 20%, for very dry areas. This rule of thumb adjustment still provides quantifiable benefit over other irrigation approaches
The second and subsequent irrigation runs follow the perimeter to the edge 17B. During the transit along the edge 17B, the moisture sensor device is active. When moisture is detected by means of a reduction in electrical resistance as measured by the probes touching the grass and/or soil, the irrigator stops and maneuvers to be parallel to the prior pass 15. The change in moisture will occur when the irrigator reaches the moist area 3 left by prior irrigation pass 15. The new pass 15B is aligned to pass 15A by a control loop that measures the electrical resistance on the probes on the left side of the irrigator and adjusts steering accordingly to maintain consistent irrigation coverage over area 3B. The path shown in the illustration is a straight line, but the path could equally be a curve or irregular path. Thus the water from a prior irrigation operation is used as a marker for subsequent irrigation operations.
As the initial pass along the far edge completes 26, the irrigator checks 27 the water tank level and returns to the refill station if necessary. Additional irrigation passes can be completed while water remains in the irrigator. Once an initial pass along an edge has been completed the irrigator follows 22 the damp edge by aligning 23 either the left or right side of the irrigator to the damp edge.
Even under low humidity conditions in full sun the dampness in the grass and soil will be remain present long enough for the irrigator to refill and return to the area. Since irrigation is usually performed at night to reduce evaporation, the moisture will be present for hours so there are few limitations on timing between irrigation passes.
In Step 1 the hose-attached irrigator 1 is placed near the perimeter wire 39 with the wire driver 24 connected and operational. The irrigator 1 is connected to a water supply hose 32. The irrigator is started by means of its control panel, by a remote radio command, or by an internal timer. Once started the irrigator finds and centers on the perimeter wire.
In Step 2 the irrigator applies a small area 33 of water to act as a marker. This patch of wet grass allows the irrigator to accurately determine when it has returned to the starting point. The irrigator then proceeds to follow the perimeter wire.
In Step 3 the irrigator continues to follow the perimeter wire while using the surface moisture sensors to take surface moisture measurements. The measurements are used to detect the start marker 33 and also to build a profile of surface moisture than represents the entire lawn area.
In Step 4 the irrigator finds the wet area marker and concludes the perimeter discovery phase.
In Step 5 the irrigator rotates 180 degrees and irrigates the perimeter area 43 along the perimeter wire.
In Step 6 perimeter irrigation terminates when the irrigator detects the marker area 26. The perimeter irrigation step provides even irrigation right up to each boundary but without the overspray and underspray inherent in sprinkler systems. The perimeter irrigation also serves as a marker and constraint for the next phase of irrigation.
In Step 7 the irrigator reverses direction (changes from CCW path to CW path, or vice versa) and starts irrigating a path 44 inside the perimeter path 43. Surface moisture sensors on the irrigator guide the irrigator along the path. In the path is clockwise, the irrigator control loop adjusts steering so that the left side sensor remains in contact with wet turf while the right side sensor is in contact with dry turf. For counter-clockwise irrigation, the sides are swapped. The irrigator sensors and water dispenser may be implemented such that each irrigation pass overlaps the prior path by one half of the width of the irrigator, or such that the irrigator covers a full-width each time. Full width irrigation is shown
In Step 8 the irrigator completes the first wet-edge path. Completion may be determined using the electronic compass to detect when the heading matches the initial heading at the start of the path. Specifically, heading detection is done in two steps of 180 degrees to ensure a full 360-degree rotation has been performed.
In Step 9, the next irrigation path initiates in a clockwise direction. Because the irrigator alternates clockwise and counterclockwise paths, twisting and kinking of the supply hose is avoided.
Step 10 continues the irrigation path started in Step 9. The irregular lawn area is automatically handled by the navigation method. This shape would be problematic for sprinkler irrigation as it is very difficult or impossible to position sprinklers such that even coverage is achieved.
Step 10 and Step 11 show the conclusion of the irrigation cycle. When a dry edge cannot be found, the irrigator rotates 49 on its axis. The irrigator's compass detects the rotation and the irrigator may stop watering, drive to another lawn area, or scan for unirrigated regions within the lawn area. Unirrigated regions can be predicted by calculating the lawn area and approximate shape during the initial boundary runs (Steps 1-6) and comparing that to the total irrigated area.
By this method and the device described in this invention, a mobile robotic irrigator can navigate and efficiently irrigate a lawn area.
The current application claims the benefit of two earlier-filed provisional patent applications. The first provisional patent application was filed on Jun. 22, 2015 and was assigned application Ser. No. 62/182,758 It listed the same inventor. The second provisional patent application was filed on Mar. 30, 2016 and was assigned application Ser. No. 62/315,493. It listed the same inventor.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62182758 | Jun 2015 | US | |
62315493 | Mar 2016 | US |