Increasing uses of precision directional sensors has increased the need for mechanical manipulators that can point objects, or workpieces, mounted thereon, such as those sensors, accurately and repeatedly anywhere in a desired workspace. Singularities in the dynamics of such manipulators, or loss of a degree of freedom in the workspace, due both to conditions in the physical structure or in control software used in the control system provided therefor, often impede the performance of mechanical manipulators in reaching these goals.
Many uses of these mechanical manipulators require a highly precise but limited range of motion for the manipulator in providing various desired paintings of objects mounted thereon. One such manipulator that has been used for these purposes is provided by gimbals supporting an object for pointing such as a sensor. In the past, such pointing gimbals have had a gimbal ring arrangement driven by a pair of motors. Their use requires providing therewith flexible wiring and/or slip-rings to supply electrical power to the mounted object, and to provide position and rate information to at least one of the drive motors. These slip-rings or other forms of supplying electrical power and communicating information through or around objects rotating relative to each other often results in reliability problems due to mechanical wear, aging through corrosion, and other environmental factors.
In many instances, and in particular, airborne systems such as missiles, it is very advantageous for manipulators used for pointing sensors therein in desired directions to be very compact. Not only do such manipulators need to be compact in mechanical extent but must also manipulate the sensor mounted thereon in a very compact workspace. The sensors themselves may take a relatively large fraction of the work envelope within which they are manipulated. This necessitates a robotic manipulator that has at least portions thereof with a relatively thin cross-section that permits operation in a confined space while at the same time manipulating a relatively bulky sensor. One reason for this limiting of the sensor motion becoming critical is due to the geometry required of the missile nose cone necessary to meet its aerodynamic performance specifications. The nose cone for example may incorporate a hemispherical transparent lens that, as indicated above, requires the motion of the sensor to track the geometry of the interior surface of that lens at a constant small separation distance such that the sensor pointing or sensing axis being maintained in directions normal to that surface.
Another performance requirement is that the mounted object such as a sensor be isolated from shock and vibration. Such mechanical disturbances are always present in uses of such manipulators such as when a missile, in which a sensor is mounted on one of those manipulators, is being handled, carried on a moving platform, or propelled in flight. Elaborate and costly means have been designed for gimbal mounted sensors to isolate them from shock and vibration transmitted thereto by the gimbals. However, this adds to the cost and complexity of the device. Thus, there is a desire for an improved pointing mechanical manipulator especially for use requiring precise direction positioning.
The present invention provides controlled relative motion system permitting a controlled motion member, joined to a base member, to selectively move with respect to said base member having a base support, an output structure and a plurality of securing links each rotatably connected at a first end thereof to a selected one of the base support and the output structure so as to be free to rotate about a corresponding intersection rotation axis that intersects that end, and with a circumferential motion pair of those securing links having each member thereof rotatably connected at an opposite second end thereof to that remaining one of the base support and the output structure so as to have the second end of each member rotate in a corresponding rotation plane, all of which rotation planes are parallel to one another, and also so as to rotate about a common symmetry rotation axis perpendicular to the rotation planes that is free of intersecting with any of the second ends. In addition, there is a force imparting member that is coupled to a selected coupling one of said first and second ends of a selected one of said circumferential motion pair of securing links, and is capable of directing said coupling end to rotate.
The object positioning arrangement of the present invention, shown in an overhead perspective view in
These two ring members and the truncated shell cooperate in various movements resulting from the applied forces of two motors, 5 and 5′, mounted on base 1, that force the corresponding ones of links 2 and 2′, respectively, to which they are connected to rotate in base 1 about their corresponding rotation axes, 6 and 6′. Such rotations force the remaining link 2″ to also rotate about its rotation axis, 6″, because of the resulting motions of truncated cylindrical shell 4 and ring members 4′ and 4″ even though this remaining link is not connected to any motor. Truncated cylindrical shell 4 and ring members 4′ and 4″are all aligned so as to each have its radial axis of symmetry occur along a common symmetry axis, 7, to thereby result in each such axis being oriented in common with those axes of the others.
These components thus cooperate under applied forces of motors 5 and 5′ to produce motion of the truncated shell and the rings in three-dimensional space about one center point to thereby point symmetry axis 7 in the direction desired. This center point, or the center of rotation, is located at the intersection of the three link rotation axes 6, 6′ and 6″ in base 1 about each of which a corresponding one of links 2, 2′ and 2″ is capable of rotating through its being rotatably connected to base 1 as indicated above.
The three links 2, 2′ and 2″ are each connected at one end to base 1 through a corresponding clevis-like arm in base 1 by a corresponding motor shaft or pin extending through a corresponding one of three pairs of rotatable bearings (only partially shown). Links 2, 2′ and 2″, at their other ends, are connected into a corresponding one of three bearings, 8, 8′ and 8″, each set in a corresponding one of arms 3, 3′ and 3″, by corresponding one of three pivot stem shafts, 9, 9′ and 9″, each extending from one of these link ends into a corresponding one of those bearings. That is, each of links 2, 2′ and 2″ is rotatably connected to a corresponding one of arms 3, 3′ and 3″ through a corresponding one of three pivot pins 9, 9′ and 9″ at the ends thereof that are positioned in a corresponding one of three bearings 8, 8′ and 8″ so as to each be capable of rotating in its bearing about a corresponding axis of rotation, 10, 10′ and 10″. Arms 3, 3′ and 3″ merge into truncated cylindrical shell 4 and rings 4′ and 4″, respectively, with this shell and rings each being capable of rotating about symmetry axis 7 as indicated above.
Rings 4′ and 4″ are mounted around the outer surface of truncated cylindrical shell 4 each near a corresponding end of that shell, and are capable of being rotated about that shell through these mountings being provided by a corresponding one of a pair of thin cross-section ring bearings, 11 and 11′. These thin cross-section bearings are constructed to withstand the static and dynamic forces encountered during use of the manipulator by the very small ball bearings and bearing races needed in such a construction which are ideal for many circumstances in which manipulator configuration space is very limited. Truncated cylindrical shell 4, inside rings 4′ and 4″, forms the manipulator output structure for the mounting therein of any of various objects desired to have a selected directional orientability during use such as a sensor or other workpiece. Thus, such a workpiece is supported in shell 4 by arm 3 as shown in
Thus, a workpiece is mounted above the center point of rotation at the intersection of the three link rotation axes 6, 6′ and 6″ in base 1 on or in the open interior of shell or output structure 4, or both. Alternatively, output structure 4 and such a workpiece may be to some extent structurally integrated through having some shared structural members.
This configuration is advantageous when manipulating a workpiece, such as a sensor, which, when placed in motion by the manipulator, must follow closely the interior surface of a lens or radome provided thereabout while requiring short lengths of wire, tubing, or fiber optic harnesses for conveying power and signals to or from that workpiece, or both. Also, the workpiece, again such as a sensor, may need to undergo those motions in a very compact workspace without mechanically interfering with its housing or other structures positioned in the vicinity thereof.
In further detail,
Motors 5 and 5′ have their rotor output shafts connected to links 2 and 2′ which links have those motor shafts extending therethrough to be held on either side of the link in a corresponding pair of bearings, 12 and 12′, (only partially shown) in the clevis-like arm structures that are part of base 1 as seen in
For example, if ascents occur in selected combinations of such rotations, the end portions of the links furthest from the motors will resultingly move upward and perhaps closer together as permitted by corresponding rotations of rings 4′ and 4″ about large ring bearings 11 and 11′ on shell 4 on which these rings are mounted. Similarly, if link 2″ is forced to ascend or descend because of rotations of the two motors resulting in movements of shell 4, link 2″ may converge toward or diverge away from the two motor rotated links 2 and 2′ depending on the motions selected to be imparted to the two motor driven links.
Links 2, 2′ and 2″, in addition to orienting a workpiece mounted in shell or output structure 4, can be arranged to aid in isolating that workpiece, typically some kind of a sensor, from shock and vibration which may otherwise be transmitted thereto from base 1 of the manipulator. Thus, the arrangements for base bearings 12, 12′ and 12″, link-arm bearings 8, 8′ and 8″, and large shell ring bearings 11 and 11′, in this system may be shock mounted in rubber bushings or provided with other forms of shock and vibration dampening devices.
The mechanical manipulator described above for manipulating the angular position in three-dimensional space of any object mounted in the output structure thereof has the advantage of a large passage, or pass-through opening, extending through truncated cylindrical shell, or output structure 4, and rings 4′ and 4″, and a corresponding opening extending through base 1. This pass-through opening, or passageway, accommodates any wires, fiber optics cables, or any flexible tubes or hoses needed or desirable for use with workpieces mounted in or on shell, or output structure, 4. In addition, as indicated above, mounting motors 5 and 5′ fixedly in base 1 to eliminate the need for flexible wires, cables, commutators, slip rings or twist capsules for the motors to thereby minimize electrical noise and increase reliability.
This manipulator is mechanically stiffened and made more precise in directional pointing through the use of the relatively simple mechanical design therefor that needs relatively few components. The larger available space remaining in a specified manipulator configuration space resulting from this use of the above manipulator with fewer components, and the unique kinematics of that manipulator, allows having the structure thereof further stiffened by increasing the mechanical size of some of those components. This manipulator also can be fabricated with many off-the-shelf components, such as the bearings, to thereby reduce fabrication costs.
A mechanically stiffer object positioning arrangement, such as that described above, allows directional orienting, or pointing, of a workpiece mounted therein to be more precise. Pointing precision can be described as a combination of pointing accuracy and pointing position repeatability. Mechanical stiffness determines the capability for the arrangement to maintain the configuration of component relationships therein for a given output position command so that the workpiece mounted in the stiffened manipulator output structure will come correspondingly closer to the same output position the next time that the command is repeated than it would if instead it was less stiff.
However, selective use of somewhat pliable dampening devices in critical locations, such as use of rubber bushings and other forms of rubber mounts, does not necessarily detract from obtaining better mechanical stiffness. Thus, component mountings and joints can be provided with energy dampening structures that attenuate mechanical shocks or vibrations over time without overly affecting the precision of their positional placements. Compliance can be further managed in actively controlled object positioning arrangement systems where output structure mounted workpieces, such as sensors, are manipulated into various positions for scanning over selected angular ranges in real-time by such a control system in which arrangements often repeatability rather than accuracy is the more important performance specification. A certain amount of sag of the workpiece, or sensor, caused by the distortion of the above mentioned dampening devices, may be tolerated as the servo control loop implemented about the manipulator in such a control system is updated by actual real-time information gathered in connection with the sensor while it is being manipulated to differing orientations.
A second embodiment of the object positioning arrangement of the present invention, which uses simpler and less costly components, is shown in an overhead perspective view in
Ring assembly 4 may be molded or machined from a polymer material such as Teflon or other self-lubricated plastic. This assembly could also be fabricated from aluminum or any other metal using any variety of machine tools from engine lathes to multi-axis numerically controlled machining centers.
The ring may be provided in two sections as shown in
Also, the split ring portions of ring assembly 4 can be provided with a preloading force against each other thereby creating a preloading force on the spherical ball bearing members 3, 3′ and 3″ to thereby reduce or eliminate backlash. A “wave”, or Belleville, washer mounted between the two ring sections is one method to create a preload and reduce or eliminate backlash. This could be accomplished by forming the groove resulting from the two ring sections being mated together being somewhat smaller than ball members 3, 3′ and 3″ that move in and along that groove. Another method would be to have a radial array of machine screws that could be tightened to tighten together the two ring sections to increase the pressure on the bearing members thus reducing or eliminating unwanted backlash.
As indicated above, spherical ball bearing member 3′ is captured at a fixed location along the circumference of the bearing race in ring assembly 4, and this capture is made by a socket, 8, as a ball and socket or universal joint as seen in
The outer side of ring assembly, or output structure, 4, away from base 1, is the mounting surface for any workpiece, such as a sensor, to be manipulated. An advantage of this construction is relatively large objects may be placed on or in this ring assembly, or both, utilizing the space below the inner surface of ring assembly 4, more or less facing base 1, so that the workpiece can extend to or below the plane of this ring inner surface towards base 1. This space in and below ring assembly 4 is larger than in the previous embodiment as it obviates the large ring bearings 4 and 4′ as well as the small bearings 8, 8′ and 8″ mounted in the arms 3, 3′ and 3″ used in that previous embodiment. Rotation of the object to be manipulated again occurs about the center of rotation point formed by the intersection of axes 6, 6′ and 6″ about which links 2, 2′ and 2″ rotate in being rotatably connected through bearing pairs 12, 12′ and 12″ to base 1.
Links 2, 2′ and 2″ can again be arranged to aid in isolating a workpiece, such as a sensor, from shock and vibration which may otherwise be transmitted from base 1 of the manipulator in addition to orienting it as desired. Thus, the arrangements for spherical ball bearing members 3, 3′ and 3″ and link bearings 12, 12′ and 12″ in this system may by shock mounted in rubber bushings or other forms of shock and vibration dampening devices to isolate the workpiece, such as a sensor, from unwanted shock and vibration which could degrade the performance thereof.
Thus, the structure in the present embodiment, which is most similar to base 1 in the first embodiment shown in
This arrangement allows placing an object or workpiece to be rotated to various orientations, or directional paintings, by the manipulator through rotating it about a single center point of rotation that is often coincident with the approximate center of the output structure. The workpiece, such as a sensor, will be similarly rotated especially if that workpiece is mounted to the output structure so as to be within an open interior selected to be provided in that structure. Thus, an output structure, 1, can have a workpiece, 1′, depending on its size, mounted above, across from, or even below the center point of rotation in the open interior of output structure 1.
As shown in
The center point of rotation of output structure 1 is the intersection of three axes, 6, 6′ and 6″, about which links 2, 2′ and 2″ rotate to position, or orient, or directionally point, a symmetry axis, 7, perpendicular to axes 6, 6′ and 6″ and passing through their common intersection. This rotation center location is in contrast to the two previous embodiments in
In more detail, as shown in
The other ends of links 2, 2′ and 2″ have a corresponding one of three bearings, 12, 12′ and 12″, provided therein for providing a rotatable connection to output structure 1 (and so to workpiece 1′ mounted therein). Output structure 1 has three pivot pins, 13, 13′ and 13″, extending outward from the side wall thereof at symmetrical locations around that wall. The rotatable connections between these links and the output structure is provided by having each of pivot pins 13, 13′ and 13″ positioned in a corresponding one of bearings 12, 12′ and 12″ to thereby allow each link to rotate about a corresponding axis of rotation 6, 6′ and 6″ best seen in
A pair of spur gear sectors, 14′ and 14″, are each affixed to a corresponding one of rings 4′ and 4″, respectively, which rings are, as indicated above, each rotatably mounted by a corresponding one of ring bearings 11 and 11′ to an end of truncated cylindrical shell 4. Motors 5 and 5′, for selectively move the manipulator output structure 1, each has its rotors shaft provided with an extension shaft with a spur pinion gear affixed to the opposite end thereof. Each of these spur pinion gears is engaged with a corresponding one of spur gear sectors 14′ and 14″ to allow motor 5 to force ring 4″ to selectively rotate and to allow motor 5′ to force ring 4′ to selectively rotate.
In operation, the motors 5 and 5′ selectively force rotation of sector gears 14′ and 14″ through rotating their motor shafts and the pinion gears thereon thereby causing rotation of rings 4′ and 4″ relative to each other about base truncated cylindrical shell 4 through which extends a common central axis. Clevises 3′ and 3″, as part of rings 4′ and 4″, force links 2′ and 2″ to ascend or descend as those devises approach or recede from the pinion gears in the rotations of their rings thereby causing output structure 1, supporting the object to be oriented, to rotate about at least two axes. Link 2 is not directly forced to move by a motor but is forced to move by movements of output structure 1 due to its rotary connection thereto and to base truncated cylindrical shell 4 provided the base of the present embodiment. As in the two previous embodiments, link 2 functions to stabilize the roll axis of the manipulator. Without this constraint, unwanted roll rotation of the object to be manipulated, that is, the workpiece, could result about axis 7.
Operation of the device can best be seen in
Links 2, 2′ and 2″, in addition to orienting a workpiece mounted in shell or output structure 4, can be arranged to aid in isolating that workpiece, typically some kind of a sensor, from shock and vibration which may otherwise be transmitted thereto from base 1 of the manipulator. Thus, the arrangements for link bearings 12, 12′ and 12″, clevis bearings 8, 8′ and 8″, and large shell ring bearings 11 and 11′, in this system may be shock mounted in rubber bushings or provided with other forms of shock and vibration dampening devices.
The different foregoing mechanical embodiments allow choosing different center points of rotation of mounted objects to be manipulated. As a result, one may be chosen over the others in a particular object orienting situation as being better suited to its surroundings in use.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
This application claims the benefit of Provisional Patent Application No. 61/130,905 filed Jun. 4, 2008 for ROBOTIC MANIPULATOR.
The U.S. Government has a paid-up license in this invention and the right in limited circumstances to require the patent owner to license others on reasonable terms as provided for by the terms of Contract No. W9113M-07-C-0016 awarded by US Army Space & Missile Defense Command.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61130905 | Jun 2008 | US |