Robust adaptive noise canceling (ANC) in a personal audio device

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9502020
  • Patent Number
    9,502,020
  • Date Filed
    Friday, March 14, 2014
    10 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 22, 2016
    7 years ago
  • CPC
  • Field of Search
    • US
    • 355 072000
    • 381 056000
    • 381 071100
    • 381 071600
    • 381 071110
    • 381 093000
    • 704 226000
    • 704 058000
    • 704 275000
    • 332 103000
    • 375 232000
    • 324 536000
    • 367 127000
    • 370 288000
    • 379 093370
    • 379 406080
    • 379 406090
    • 434 185000
    • 700 293000
    • 702 058000
    • 714 731000
    • CPC
    • G10K11/1784
    • G10K11/175
    • G10K2210/108
    • G10K2210/3055
    • G10K2210/503
    • G10K2210/3039
  • International Classifications
    • H04R29/00
    • H03G3/00
    • G10K11/16
    • Disclaimer
      This patent is subject to a terminal disclaimer.
Abstract
An adaptive noise canceling (ANC) circuit adaptively generates an anti-noise signal that is injected into the speaker or other transducer output to cause cancellation of ambient audio sounds. At least one microphone provides an error signal indicative of the noise cancellation at the transducer, and the adaptive filter is adapted to minimize the error signal. In order to prevent improper adaptation or instabilities in one or both of the adaptive filters, spikes are detected in the error signal by comparing the error signal or its rate of change to a threshold. Therefore, if the magnitude of the coefficient error is greater than a threshold value for an update, the update is skipped. Alternatively the step size of the updates may be reduced. Similar criteria can be applied to a filter modeling the secondary path, based on detection applied to both the source audio and the error signal.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


The present invention relates generally to personal audio devices such as headphones that include adaptive noise cancellation (ANC), and, more specifically, to architectural features of an ANC system in which the update of one or more acoustical path estimates is tailored to avoid instability due to external changes.


2. Background of the Invention


Telephones, such as mobile/cellular telephones, cordless telephones, and other consumer audio devices, such as personal audio players, are in widespread use. Performance of such devices with respect to intelligibility can be improved by providing noise canceling using a reference microphone to measure ambient acoustic events and then using signal processing to insert an anti-noise signal into the output of the device to cancel the ambient acoustic events. Other audio devices may also benefit from noise canceling, or may be provided for the purpose of noise canceling.


Since the acoustic environment around personal audio devices can change dramatically, depending on the sources of noise that are present and the position of the device itself, it is desirable to adapt the noise canceling to take into account such environmental changes. In some cases, adaptive noise canceling circuits can generate undesirable results under certain circumstances.


Therefore, it would be desirable to provide a personal audio device, including a telephone that provides robust noise cancellation that is effective and/or does not generate undesirable responses when external conditions change.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The above-stated objectives of providing a personal audio device having robust performance in response to changing external conditions is accomplished in a personal audio system, a method of operation, and an integrated circuit.


The personal audio device includes an output transducer for reproducing an audio signal that includes both source audio for playback to a listener, and an anti-noise signal for countering the effects of ambient audio sounds in an acoustic output of the transducer. The personal audio device also includes the integrated circuit to provide adaptive noise-canceling (ANC) functionality. The method is a method of operation of the personal audio system and integrated circuit. A microphone is mounted on the device housing to provide a microphone signal indicative of the ambient audio sounds at the output of the transducer. An ANC processing circuit adaptively generates an anti-noise signal in conformity with the microphone signal, so that ambient audio sounds are canceled. The processing circuit adapts the response of the adaptive filter by adjusting the coefficients of the at least one adaptive filter according to an error signal generated from the microphone signal. If the magnitude of the error is greater than a threshold value, the processing circuit freezes updating of the coefficients of the at least one adaptive filter or reduces the step size of the update, reducing disruption of operation by samples that might otherwise de-stabilize the control of the adaptive filter or otherwise generate an undesirable response. The threshold value is determined from an average value of the error signal or a value derived from the reference microphone signal.


In another example, which may be combined with the first example, a secondary path adaptive filter that is used to shape the source audio for removal from the error microphone signal to generate the error signal may be controlled to avoid disruption by spikes in the source audio by comparing the error signal to a threshold value and halting or reducing the step size of the updates to the secondary path adaptive filter.


The foregoing and other objectives, features, and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following, more particular, description of the preferred embodiment of the invention, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is an illustration of a wireless telephone 10 that provides an example of a personal audio device as disclosed herein.



FIG. 2 is a block diagram of circuits within wireless telephone 10.



FIGS. 3A-3B are block diagrams depicting signal processing circuits and functional blocks of various exemplary ANC circuits that can be used to implement ANC circuit 30 of CODEC integrated circuit 20 of FIG. 2.



FIG. 4A is a graph showing a typical cost function of a least-mean-squares (LMS) control block.



FIG. 4B is a graph showing a modified cost function as implemented in one or both of W coefficient control block 31 and SE coefficient control block 33 of FIGS. 3A-3B.



FIG. 5 is a block diagram depicting signal processing circuits and functional blocks within CODEC integrated circuit 20.





DESCRIPTION OF ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENT

Noise canceling techniques and circuits that can be implemented in a personal audio device, such as a wireless telephone, are disclosed. The personal audio device includes an adaptive noise canceling (ANC) circuit that measures the ambient acoustic environment and generates a signal that is injected into the speaker (or other transducer) output to cancel ambient acoustic events using at least one adaptive filter. A microphone is provided to measure the ambient acoustic environment at the transducer output giving an indication of the effectiveness of the noise cancellation. An error signal generated from the microphone output is used to control adaptation of the response of the adaptive filter to minimize the error signal. An additional secondary path estimating adaptive filter may be used to remove the playback audio from the error microphone signal in order to generate the error signal. In order to prevent improper adaptation or instabilities in one or both of the adaptive filters, the cost function of the adaptive filters is modified, such that if the magnitude of the error signal is greater than a threshold value for an update, the update is skipped. The threshold may be determined as a measurement of ambient noise, so that in high noise conditions, the error is allowed to be larger while still updating the filter coefficients. Alternatively, or in combination, the rate of change of the error signal can be compared to a threshold and if the rate of change exceeds the threshold, the update can be skipped and/or the update rate of the filter coefficients can be slowed.


Referring now to FIG. 1, a wireless telephone 10 is illustrated in proximity to a human ear 5. Illustrated wireless telephone 10 is an example of a device in which techniques disclosed herein may be employed, but it is understood that not all of the elements or configurations embodied in illustrated wireless telephone 10, or in the circuits depicted in subsequent illustrations, are required in order to practice the claims. Wireless telephone 10 includes a transducer such as a speaker SPKR that reproduces distant speech received by wireless telephone 10, along with other local audio events such as ringtones, stored audio program material, injection of near-end speech (i.e., the speech of the user of wireless telephone 10) to provide a balanced conversational perception, and other audio that requires reproduction by wireless telephone 10, such as sources from web-pages or other network communications received by wireless telephone 10 and audio indications such as battery low and other system event notifications. A near speech microphone NS is provided to capture near-end speech, which is transmitted from wireless telephone 10 to the other conversation participant(s).


Wireless telephone 10 includes adaptive noise canceling (ANC) circuits and features that inject an anti-noise signal into speaker SPKR to improve intelligibility of the distant speech and other audio reproduced by speaker SPKR. A reference microphone R is provided for measuring the ambient acoustic environment, and is positioned away from the typical position of a user's mouth, so that the near-end speech is minimized in the signal produced by reference microphone R. A third microphone, error microphone E is provided in order to further improve the ANC operation by providing a measure of the ambient audio combined with the audio reproduced by speaker SPKR close to ear 5 at an error microphone reference position ERP, when wireless telephone 10 is in close proximity to ear 5. Exemplary circuits 14 within wireless telephone 10 include an audio CODEC integrated circuit 20 that receives the signals from reference microphone R, near speech microphone NS and error microphone E and interfaces with other integrated circuits such as a RF integrated circuit 12 containing the wireless telephone transceiver. In alternative implementations, the circuits and techniques disclosed herein may be incorporated in a single integrated circuit that contains control circuits and other functionality for implementing the entirety of the personal audio device, such as an MP3 player-on-a-chip integrated circuit.


In general, the ANC techniques of the present invention measure ambient acoustic events (as opposed to the output of speaker SPKR and/or the near-end speech) impinging on reference microphone R, and by also measuring the same ambient acoustic events impinging on error microphone E. The ANC processing circuits of illustrated wireless telephone 10 adapt an anti-noise signal generated from the output of reference microphone R to have a characteristic that minimizes the amplitude of the ambient acoustic events at error microphone E, i.e. at error microphone reference position ERP. Since acoustic path P(z) extends from reference microphone R to error microphone E, the ANC circuits are essentially estimating acoustic path P(z) combined with removing effects of an electro-acoustic path S(z) that represents the response of the audio output circuits of CODEC IC 20 and the acoustic/electric transfer function of speaker SPKR including the coupling between speaker SPKR and error microphone E in the particular acoustic environment. The coupling between speaker SPKR and error microphone E is affected by the proximity and structure of ear 5 and other physical objects and human head structures that may be in proximity to wireless telephone 10, when wireless telephone 10 is not firmly pressed to ear 5. Since the user of wireless telephone 10 actually hears the output of speaker SPKR at a drum reference position DRP, differences between the signal produced by error microphone E and what is actually heard by the user are shaped by the response of the ear canal, as well as the spatial distance between error microphone reference position ERP and drum reference position DRP. At higher frequencies, the spatial differences lead to multi-path nulls that reduce the effectiveness of the ANC system, and in some cases may increase ambient noise. While the illustrated wireless telephone 10 includes a two microphone ANC system with a third near speech microphone NS, some aspects of the techniques disclosed herein may be practiced in a system that does not include separate error and reference microphones, or a wireless telephone using near speech microphone NS to perform the function of the reference microphone R. Also, in personal audio devices designed only for audio playback, near speech microphone NS will generally not be included, and the near speech signal paths in the circuits described in further detail below can be omitted.


Referring now to FIG. 2, circuits within wireless telephone 10 are shown in a block diagram. The circuit shown in FIG. 2 further applies to the other configurations mentioned above, except that signaling between CODEC integrated circuit 20 and other units within wireless telephone 10 are provided by cables or wireless connections when CODEC integrated circuit 20 is located outside of wireless telephone 10. In such a configuration, signaling between CODEC integrated circuit 20 and error microphone E, reference microphone R and speaker SPKR are provided by wired or wireless connections when CODEC integrated circuit 20 is located within wireless telephone 10. CODEC integrated circuit 20 includes an analog-to-digital converter (ADC) 21A for receiving the reference microphone signal and generating a digital representation ref of the reference microphone signal. CODEC integrated circuit 20 also includes an ADC 21B for receiving the error microphone signal and generating a digital representation err of the error microphone signal, and an ADC 21C for receiving the near speech microphone signal and generating a digital representation ns of the error microphone signal. CODEC IC 20 generates an output for driving speaker SPKR from an amplifier A1, which amplifies the output of a delta-sigma modulated digital-to-analog converter (DAC) 23 that receives the output of a combiner 26. Combiner 26 combines audio signals is from internal audio sources 24, and the anti-noise signal anti-noise generated by an ANC circuit 30, which by convention has the same polarity as the noise in reference microphone signal ref and is therefore subtracted by combiner 26. Combiner 26 also combines an attenuated portion of near speech signal ns, i.e., sidetone information st, so that the user of wireless telephone 10 hears their own voice in proper relation to downlink speech ds, which is received from a radio frequency (RF) integrated circuit 22. Near speech signal ns is also provided to RF integrated circuit 22 and is transmitted as uplink speech to the service provider via an antenna ANT.


Referring now to FIG. 3A, an example of details of an ANC circuit 30A that can be used to implement ANC circuit 30 of FIG. 2 are shown. An adaptive filter 32 receives reference microphone signal ref and under ideal circumstances, adapts its transfer function W(z) to be P(z)/S(z) to generate the anti-noise signal. The coefficients of adaptive filter 32 are controlled by a W coefficient control block 31 that uses a correlation of two signals to determine the response of adaptive filter 32, which generally minimizes, in a least-mean squares sense, those components of reference microphone signal ref that are present in error microphone signal err. The signals provided as inputs to W coefficient control block 31 are the reference microphone signal ref as shaped by a copy of an estimate of the response of path S(z) provided by a filter 34B and another signal provided from the output of a combiner 36 that includes error microphone signal err and an inverted amount of downlink audio signal ds that has been processed by filter response SE(z), of which response SECOPY(z) is a copy. By transforming the inverted copy of downlink audio signal ds with the estimate of the response of path S(z), the downlink audio that is removed from error microphone signal err before comparison should match the expected version of downlink audio signal ds reproduced at error microphone signal err, since the electrical and acoustical path of S(z) is the path taken by downlink audio signal ds to arrive at error microphone E. Combiner 36 combines error microphone signal err and the inverted downlink audio signal ds to produce an error signal e. By transforming reference microphone signal ref with a copy of the estimate of the response of path S(z), SECOPY(z), and minimizing the portion of the error signal that correlates with components of reference microphone signal ref, adaptive filter 32 adapts to the desired response of P(z)/S(z). By removing downlink audio signal ds from error signal e, adaptive filter 32 is prevented from adapting to the relatively large amount of downlink audio present in error microphone signal err.


To implement the above, an adaptive filter 34A has coefficients controlled by a SE coefficient control block 33, which updates based on correlated components of downlink audio signal ds and an error value. SE coefficient control block 33 correlates the actual downlink audio signal ds with the components of downlink audio signal ds that are present in error microphone signal err. Adaptive filter 34A is thereby adapted to generate a signal from downlink audio signal ds, that when subtracted from error microphone signal err, contains the content of error microphone signal err that is not due to downlink audio signal ds in error signal e.


Under certain conditions, such as near speech or wind noise entering reference microphone R and/or error microphone E, or when mechanical events occur such as the listener's fingernails scratching on the housing of wireless telephone 10, response W(z) can become unstable, and the coefficient values produced by W coefficient control block 31 can quickly deviate from values that will provide proper noise cancellation. FIG. 4A shows a typical cost function 50A, which is the measure of the mean-square error that is generally minimized by adaptive filter coefficient control blocks having least-means-squared (LMS) adaptive control implementations. The value of the cost function 50A is proportional to e2, where e is the measured error and thus function 50A is a parabolic response that becomes increasingly steeper as the error increases. However, referring again to FIG. 3A, in order to provide more robust performance, an ambient spike detector 35 detects if error signal e exceeds the nominal background ambient noise level by a threshold. The threshold is determined by a threshold determination block 40 which uses one of the output of filter 34B, reference microphone signal ref, error signal e, or any combination of the above to generate a threshold ambient noise value to which the absolute value of error signal e is compared by a comparison block 42.


If a rapid change, i.e., a spike, occurs in error signal e, then comparison block 42 will assert control signals ctlW and ctlSE1 to halt update of the coefficients of adaptive filter 32 and secondary path adaptive filter 34A, by halting coefficient updates by W coefficient control 32 and SE coefficient control 33, respectively. Alternatively, control signals ctlW and/or ctlSE1 may cause the corresponding adaptive filter 32 or 34A to change step-size of the update values computed for the coefficients, so that updating the coefficients is permitted, but the amount of disruption that can be caused by the spike is limited. A counter within comparison block 42 persists the ctlW signal for at least the length of adaptive filter W(z) and persists control signal ctlSE2 for at least the length of secondary path adaptive filter SE(z) 34A. Ambient spike detector 35 effectively transforms cost function 50A of FIG. 4A to cost function 50B as shown in FIG. 4B so that if the error signal e exceeds the threshold in either the positive or negative direction, cost function 50B is limited to the corresponding one of threshold values Δ or −Δ. Since the gradient of the cost function provides the update value for adjusting the coefficients, holding cost function 50B at the corresponding one of thresholds Δ or −Δ effectively prevents update to the coefficients for the samples that exceed threshold values Δ or −Δ. The rule for adaptation is as follows where:










(

f


(

e


(
n
)


)


)

w





{





0






e


(
n
)





Δ







2







e


(
n
)


·



e



r




=

2






e


(
n
)



X








e


(
n
)




<
Δ









Do





NOT





adapt





when








e


(
n
)






Δ






Where ƒ(e(n)) is the cost function that is minimized by the adaptive filter control loop. The resulting operation prevents sudden events such as near speech and the mechanical noises and wind noise mentioned above, from reacting to error e(n) having a magnitude that exceeds threshold Δ, which adds to robustness of the ANC operation. Because thresholds Δ and −Δ are applied to the computed error, the reaction of W coefficient control block 31 and SE coefficient control block 33 can be on a per-update basis, which could be as frequent as once-per-input-sample.


Effectively, samples that would cause the error e to exceed the threshold values Δ or −Δ will be discarded, preventing them from contributing to error and instability. In other implementations, a larger group, e.g. two or more, of samples could be used for the comparison, so that a control of the duration of a tolerated disturbance can be adjusted. The technique described herein effectively provides a measure of a peak-to-average ratio of the error, since the average error will generally be proportional to the background noise level, but other such measurements could be used. In one implementation, observing the error with two different time constants gives a measure of change. For example, the comparison of individual samples of the error to the local average error can be used to trigger rejection of samples containing a disturbance. Non-linear filtering, e.g., rules such as: “ignore the next n samples when the threshold has crossed” could be used to provide additional filtering. Threshold A can be variable, and set according to the level of ambient noise. Similarly, the same sort of threshold application, with potentially different thresholds, is applied on SE coefficient control block 33. However, additionally, SE coefficient control block receives another input control signal ctlSE2 from a source spike detector 35B, which compares source audio ds to an average value of source audio ds to detect spikes in source audio ds. Either of control signals ctlSE1 and ctlSE2 will cause SE coefficient control block 33 to either freeze updates, or reduce the step size of updates, to coefficients of secondary path response SE(z).


Referring now to FIG. 3B, an example of details of an ANC circuit 30B that can alternatively be used to implement ANC circuit 30 of FIG. 2 are shown. ANC circuit 30B of FIG. 3B is similar to ANC circuit 30A of FIG. 3A, so only details of the differences between the structure and operation thereof is described below. In ANC circuit 30B, the output of filter 34B is used to provide an input to ambient spike detector 35C. The signal at the output of filter 34B is a measure of the ambient noise measured by reference microphone ref but filtered with a response that, if accurate, models secondary acoustic path S(z). If the secondary path response modeled by secondary path adaptive filter 34A is inaccurate, or suddenly disrupted, then the signal at the output of filter 34B may generate a spike that is detected when the output of filter 34B is compared by comparison block 42 to the threshold value output by threshold determination block 40. The output of filter 34B is provided to comparison block 42, and the threshold provided from threshold determination block 40 is appropriately scaled to provide the proper threshold level for comparison with the amplitude of the signal at the output of filter 34B.


Referring now to FIG. 5, a block diagram of an ANC system is shown for implementing ANC techniques as depicted in FIG. 3, and having a processing circuit 60 as may be implemented within CODEC integrated circuit 20 of FIG. 2. Processing circuit 60 includes a processor core 62 coupled to a memory 64 in which are stored program instructions comprising a computer-program product that may implement some or all of the above-described ANC techniques, as well as other signal processing. Optionally, a dedicated digital signal processing (DSP) logic 66 may be provided to implement a portion of, or alternatively all of, the ANC signal processing provided by processing circuit 60. Processing circuit 60 also includes ADCs 21A-21C, for receiving inputs from reference microphone R, error microphone E and near speech microphone NS, respectively. In alternative embodiments in which one or more of reference microphone R, error microphone E and near speech microphone NS have digital outputs, the corresponding ones of ADCs 21A-21C are omitted and the digital microphone signal(s) are interfaced directly to processing circuit 60. DAC 23 and amplifier A1 are also provided by processing circuit 60 for providing the speaker output signal, including anti-noise as described above. The speaker output signal may be a digital output signal for provision to a module that reproduces the digital output signal acoustically.


While the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to the preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the foregoing and other changes in form, and details may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.

Claims
  • 1. A personal audio device, comprising: a personal audio device housing;a transducer mounted on the housing for reproducing an audio signal including both source audio for playback to a listener and an anti-noise signal for countering effects of ambient audio sounds in an acoustic output of the transducer;a reference microphone mounted on the housing for providing a reference microphone signal indicative of the ambient audio sounds;an error microphone mounted on the housing in proximity to the transducer for providing an error microphone signal indicative of the acoustic output of the transducer and the ambient audio sounds at the transducer; anda processing circuit that adaptively generates the anti-noise signal from the reference microphone signal by adapting a first adaptive filter to reduce the presence of the ambient audio sounds heard by the listener in conformity with an error signal and the reference microphone signal, wherein the processing circuit implements a secondary path adaptive filter having a secondary path response that shapes the source audio and a combiner that removes the source audio from the error microphone signal to provide the error signal, and wherein the processing circuit adapts first coefficients of the first adaptive filter according to the reference microphone signal and the error signal and adapts second coefficients of the secondary path adaptive filter according to the error signal, and wherein if a magnitude of a value derived from the error microphone signal has a rate of change that exceeds a threshold value indicating a spike in the ambient audio sounds, the processing circuit alters adaptation of the first adaptive filter to reduce disruption in values of the coefficients caused by the spike in the ambient audio sounds.
  • 2. The personal audio device of claim 1, wherein the processing circuit determines an average level of the ambient audio sounds from an average of the value derived from the error microphone signal, and determines the rate of change of the magnitude of the value derived from the error microphone signal from a difference between the average level of the value derived from the error microphone signal and an instantaneous value of the magnitude of the value derived from the error microphone signal.
  • 3. The personal audio device of claim 1, wherein the processing circuit determines an average level of the ambient audio sounds from an average of a value derived from the reference microphone signal, and determines the rate of change of the magnitude of the value derived from the error microphone signal from a difference between the average level of the value derived from the reference microphone signal and an instantaneous value of the magnitude of the value derived from the error microphone signal.
  • 4. The personal audio device of claim 3, wherein the processing circuit further implements a controllable filter controlled by a coefficient control of the secondary path adaptive filter that filters the reference microphone signal to apply a copy of the secondary path response to the reference microphone signal, wherein the processing circuit determines the average level of the ambient audio sounds from an average value of the output of the controllable filter.
  • 5. The personal audio device of claim 1, wherein the processing circuit compares the magnitude of the value derived from the error microphone signal to the threshold value at each sample of the error microphone signal, wherein the processing circuit skips updates due to samples for which the magnitude of the value of derived from the error microphone signal exceeds the threshold value.
  • 6. The personal audio device of claim 1, wherein the processing circuit alters adaptation of the first adaptive filter by freezing adaptation of the first coefficients of the first adaptive filter.
  • 7. The personal audio device of claim 1, wherein the processing circuit alters adaptation of the first adaptive filter by reducing a step size of the first adaptive filter until the spike is absent from the value derived from the error microphone signal.
  • 8. The personal audio device of claim 1, wherein the processing circuit implements a counter that sustains the altering of the adaptation of the first adaptive filter after the rate of change of the value derived from the error microphone signal is less than the threshold value for a number of samples equal to or greater than a filter length of the first adaptive filter.
  • 9. The personal audio device of claim 1, wherein the processing circuit further alters adaptation of the secondary path adaptive filter in response to the magnitude of the value derived from the error microphone signal having a rate of change that exceeds the threshold value indicating the spike in the ambient audio sounds.
  • 10. The personal audio device of claim 1, wherein the processing circuit further determines if the source audio signal has a rate of change that exceeds a second threshold value indicating a spike in the source audio, the processing circuit alters adaptation of the secondary path adaptive filter to reduce disruption in values of the second coefficients that control adaptation of the secondary path adaptive filter caused by the spike in the source audio.
  • 11. The personal audio device of claim 10, wherein the processing circuit determines an average level of the source audio, and determines the rate of change of the source audio from a difference between the average level of the source audio and an instantaneous value of the magnitude of the value derived from the error microphone signal.
  • 12. A method of countering effects of ambient audio sounds by a personal audio device, the method comprising: adaptively generating an anti-noise signal from a reference microphone signal by adapting a first adaptive filter to reduce the presence of the ambient audio sounds heard by the listener in conformity with an error microphone signal and the reference microphone signal;combining the anti-noise signal with source audio;providing a result of the combining to a transducer;generating the reference microphone signal indicative of the ambient audio sounds with a reference microphone;generating the error microphone signal indicative of audio reproduced by the transducer the transducer and the ambient audio sounds with an error microphone;filtering the source audio with a secondary path adaptive filter having a secondary path response to produce filtered source audio;removing the filtered source audio from the error microphone signal to generate an error signal;adapting first coefficients of the first adaptive filter according to the reference microphone signal and the error signal;adapting second coefficients of the secondary path adaptive filter according to the error signal;detecting a spike in the ambient audio sounds by determining whether the magnitude of a value derived from the error microphone signal has a rate of change that exceeds a threshold value; andresponsive to the detecting having detected a spike, altering the adapting of the first coefficients and the second coefficients to reduce disruption in values of the coefficients caused by the spike.
  • 13. The method of claim 12, further comprising: determining an average level of the ambient audio sounds from an average of the value derived from the error microphone signal; anddetermining the rate of change of the magnitude of the value derived from the error microphone signal from a difference between the average level of the value derived from the error microphone signal and an instantaneous value of the magnitude of the value derived from the error microphone signal.
  • 14. The method of claim 12, further comprising: determining an average level of the ambient audio sounds from an average of a value derived from the reference microphone signal; anddetermining the rate of change of the magnitude of the value derived from the error microphone signal from a difference between the average level of the value derived from the reference microphone signal and an instantaneous value of the magnitude of the value derived from the error microphone signal.
  • 15. The method of claim 14, further comprising: filtering the reference microphone signal with a controllable filter controlled by a coefficient control of the secondary path adaptive filter to apply a copy of the secondary path response to the reference microphone signal; anddetermining the average level of the ambient audio sounds from an average value of the output of the controllable filter.
  • 16. The method of claim 12, further comprising: comparing the magnitude of the value derived from the error microphone signal to the threshold value at each sample of the error microphone signal; andthe adapting of the first coefficients of the first adaptive filter skipping updates due to samples for which the magnitude of the value of derived from the error microphone signal exceeds the threshold value.
  • 17. The method of claim 12, further comprising altering adaptation of the first adaptive filter by freezing adaptation of the first coefficients of the first adaptive filter.
  • 18. The method of claim 12, further comprising altering adaptation of the first adaptive filter by reducing a step size of the adapting of the first coefficients of the first adaptive filter until the spike is absent from the value derived from the error microphone signal.
  • 19. The method of claim 12, further comprising implementing a counter that sustains the altering of the adapting of the first coefficients of the first adaptive filter after the rate of change of the value derived from the error microphone signal is less than the threshold value for a number of samples equal to or greater than a filter length of the first adaptive filter.
  • 20. The method of claim 12, further comprising altering the adapting of the second coefficients of the secondary path adaptive filter in response to the magnitude of the value derived from the error microphone signal having a rate of change that exceeds the threshold value indicating the spike in the ambient audio sounds.
  • 21. The method of claim 12, further comprising: determining if the source audio signal has a rate of change that exceeds a second threshold value indicating a spike in the source audio; andaltering the adapting of the second coefficients of the secondary path adaptive filter to reduce disruption in values of the second coefficients caused by the spike in the source audio.
  • 22. The method of claim 21, further comprising: determining an average level of the source audio; anddetermining the rate of change of the source audio from a difference between the average level of the source audio and an instantaneous value of the magnitude of the value derived from the error microphone signal.
  • 23. An integrated circuit for integration within a personal audio device, comprising: an output for providing an output signal to an output transducer including both source audio for playback to a listener and an anti-noise signal for countering effects of ambient audio sounds in an acoustic output of the transducer;a reference microphone input for receiving a reference microphone signal indicative of the ambient audio sounds;an error microphone input for receiving an error microphone signal indicative of the acoustic output of the transducer and the ambient audio sounds at the transducer; anda processing circuit that adaptively generates the anti-noise signal from the reference signal by adapting a first adaptive filter to reduce the presence of the ambient audio sounds heard by the listener in conformity with an error signal and the reference microphone signal, wherein the processing circuit implements a secondary path adaptive filter having a secondary path response that shapes the source audio and a combiner that removes the source audio from the error microphone signal to provide the error signal, and wherein the processing circuit adapts first coefficients of the first adaptive filter according to the reference microphone signal and the error signal and adapts second coefficients of the secondary path adaptive filter according to the error signal, and wherein if a magnitude of a value derived from the error microphone signal has a rate of change that exceeds a threshold value indicating a spike in the ambient audio sounds, the processing circuit alters adaptation of the first adaptive filter to reduce disruption in values of the coefficients caused by the spike in the ambient audio sounds.
  • 24. The integrated circuit of claim 23, wherein the processing circuit determines an average level of the ambient audio sounds from an average of the value derived from the error microphone signal, and determines the rate of change of the magnitude of the value derived from the error microphone signal from a difference between the average level of the value derived from the error microphone signal and an instantaneous value of the magnitude of the value derived from the error microphone signal.
  • 25. The integrated circuit of claim 23, wherein the processing circuit determines an average level of the ambient audio sounds from an average of a value derived from the reference microphone signal, and determines the rate of change of the magnitude of the value derived from the error microphone signal from a difference between the average level of the value derived from the reference microphone signal and an instantaneous value of the magnitude of the value derived from the error microphone signal.
  • 26. The integrated circuit of claim 25, wherein the processing circuit further implements a controllable filter controlled by a coefficient control of the secondary path adaptive filter that filters the reference microphone signal to apply a copy of the secondary path response to the reference microphone signal, wherein the processing circuit determines the average level of the ambient audio sounds from an average value of the output of the controllable filter.
  • 27. The integrated circuit of claim 23, wherein the processing circuit compares the magnitude of the value derived from the error microphone signal to the threshold value at each sample of the error microphone signal, wherein the processing circuit skips updates due to samples for which the magnitude of the value of derived from the error microphone signal exceeds the threshold value.
  • 28. The integrated circuit of claim 23, wherein the processing circuit alters adaptation of the first adaptive filter by freezing adaptation of the first coefficients of the first adaptive filter.
  • 29. The integrated circuit of claim 23, wherein the processing circuit alters adaptation of the first adaptive filter by reducing a step size of the first adaptive filter until the spike is absent from the value derived from the error microphone signal.
  • 30. The integrated circuit of claim 23, wherein the processing circuit implements a counter that sustains the altering of the adaptation of the first adaptive filter after the rate of change of the value derived from the error microphone signal is less than the threshold value for a number of samples equal to or greater than a filter length of the first adaptive filter.
  • 31. The integrated circuit of claim 23, wherein the processing circuit further alters adaptation of the secondary path adaptive filter in response to the magnitude of the value derived from the error microphone signal having a rate of change that exceeds the threshold value indicating the spike in the ambient audio sounds.
  • 32. The integrated circuit of claim 23, wherein the processing circuit further determines if the source audio signal has a rate of change that exceeds a second threshold value indicating a spike in the source audio, the processing circuit alters adaptation of the secondary path adaptive filter to reduce disruption in values of the second coefficients that control adaptation of the secondary path adaptive filter caused by the spike in the source audio.
  • 33. The integrated circuit of claim 32, wherein the processing circuit determines an average level of the source audio, and determines the rate of change of the source audio from a difference between the average level of the source audio and an instantaneous value of the magnitude of the value derived from the error microphone signal.
  • 34. A personal audio device, comprising: a personal audio device housing;a transducer mounted on the housing for reproducing an audio signal including both source audio for playback to a listener and an anti-noise signal for countering effects of ambient audio sounds in an acoustic output of the transducer;a reference microphone mounted on the housing for providing a reference microphone signal indicative of the ambient audio sounds;an error microphone mounted on the housing in proximity to the transducer for providing an error microphone signal indicative of the acoustic output of the transducer and the ambient audio sounds at the transducer; anda processing circuit that adaptively generates the anti-noise signal from the reference signal by adapting a first adaptive filter to reduce the presence of the ambient audio sounds heard by the listener in conformity with an error signal and the reference microphone signal, wherein the processing circuit implements a secondary path adaptive filter having a secondary path response that shapes the source audio and a combiner that removes the source audio from the error microphone signal to provide the error signal, wherein the processing circuit further implements a copy of the secondary path adaptive filter that filters the reference microphone signal to produce a secondary-path-compensated reference microphone signal, and wherein the processing circuit adapts coefficients of the first adaptive filter according to the secondary-path-compensated reference microphone signal and the error signal, and wherein if a magnitude of the secondary-path-compensated reference microphone signal has a rate of change that exceeds a threshold value indicating a spike in the ambient audio sounds, the processing circuit alters adaptation of the first adaptive filter to reduce disruption in values of the coefficients caused by the spike in the ambient audio sounds.
  • 35. The personal audio device of claim 34, wherein the processing circuit determines an average level of the ambient audio sounds from an average of the secondary-path-compensated reference microphone signal, and determines the rate of change of the magnitude of the secondary-path-compensated reference microphone signal from a difference between the average level of the secondary-path-compensated reference microphone signal and an instantaneous value of the magnitude of the secondary-path-compensated reference microphone signal.
  • 36. A method of countering effects of ambient audio sounds by a personal audio device, the method comprising: generating a reference microphone signal indicative of the ambient audio sounds with a reference microphone;generating an error microphone signal indicative of the ambient audio sounds and audio reproduced by the transducer with an error microphone;adaptively generating an anti-noise signal from the reference microphone signal by adapting a first adaptive filter to reduce the presence of the ambient audio sounds heard by a listener in conformity with the error microphone signal and the reference microphone signal;combining the anti-noise signal with source audio;providing a result of the combining to a transducer;filtering source audio with a secondary path adaptive filter having a secondary path response that shapes the source audio to produce filtered source audio;removing the filtered source audio from the error microphone signal to generate the error signal;further implementing a copy of the secondary path adaptive filter that filters the reference microphone signal to produce a secondary-path-compensated reference microphone signal;adapting coefficients of the first adaptive filter according to the secondary-path-compensated reference microphone signal and the error signal; andaltering adaptation of the first adaptive filter to reduce disruption in values of the coefficients caused by the spike in the ambient audio sounds if a magnitude of the secondary-path-compensated reference microphone signal has a rate of change that exceeds a threshold value indicating a spike in the ambient audio sounds.
  • 37. The method of claim 36, further comprising: determining an average level of the ambient audio sounds from an average of the secondary-path-compensated reference microphone signal; anddetermining the rate of change of the magnitude of the secondary-path-compensated reference microphone signal from a difference between the average level of the secondary-path-compensated reference microphone signal and an instantaneous value of the magnitude of the secondary-path-compensated reference microphone signal.
  • 38. An integrated circuit for implementing at least a portion of a personal audio device, comprising: an output for providing an output signal to an output transducer including both source audio for playback to a listener and an anti-noise signal for countering effects of ambient audio sounds in an acoustic output of the transducer;a reference microphone input for receiving a reference microphone signal indicative of the ambient audio sounds;an error microphone input for receiving an error microphone signal indicative of the acoustic output of the transducer and the ambient audio sounds at the transducer; anda processing circuit that adaptively generates the anti-noise signal from the reference signal by adapting a first adaptive filter to reduce the presence of the ambient audio sounds heard by the listener in conformity with an error signal and the reference microphone signal, wherein the processing circuit implements a secondary path adaptive filter having a secondary path response that shapes the source audio and a combiner that removes the source audio from the error microphone signal to provide the error signal, wherein the processing circuit further implements a copy of the secondary path adaptive filter that filters the reference microphone signal to produce a secondary-path-compensated reference microphone signal, and wherein the processing circuit adapts coefficients of the first adaptive filter according to the secondary-path-compensated reference microphone signal and the error signal, and wherein if a magnitude of the secondary-path-compensated reference microphone signal has a rate of change that exceeds a threshold value indicating a spike in the ambient audio sounds, the processing circuit alters adaptation of the first adaptive filter to reduce disruption in values of the coefficients caused by the spike in the ambient audio sounds.
  • 39. The integrated circuit of claim 38, wherein the processing circuit determines an average level of the ambient audio sounds from an average of the secondary-path-compensated reference microphone signal, and determines the rate of change of the magnitude of the secondary-path-compensated reference microphone signal from a difference between the average level of the secondary-path-compensated reference microphone signal and an instantaneous value of the magnitude of the secondary-path-compensated reference microphone signal.
  • 40. A personal audio device, comprising: a personal audio device housing;a transducer mounted on the housing for reproducing an audio signal including both source audio for playback to a listener and an anti-noise signal for countering effects of ambient audio sounds in an acoustic output of the transducer;a reference microphone mounted on the housing for providing a reference microphone signal indicative of the ambient audio sounds;an error microphone mounted on the housing in proximity to the transducer for providing an error microphone signal indicative of the acoustic output of the transducer and the ambient audio sounds at the transducer; anda processing circuit that adaptively generates the anti-noise signal from the reference signal by adapting a first adaptive filter to reduce the presence of the ambient audio sounds heard by the listener in conformity with an error signal and the reference microphone signal, wherein the processing circuit implements a secondary path adaptive filter having a secondary path response that shapes the source audio and a combiner that removes the source audio from the error microphone signal to provide the error signal, wherein the processing circuit adapts first coefficients of the first adaptive filter according to the reference microphone signal and the error signal, wherein the processing circuit adapts second coefficients of the secondary path adaptive filter according to the source audio and the error signal, wherein if a magnitude of the source audio has a rate of change that exceeds a threshold value indicating a spike in the source audio, the processing circuit alters adaptation of the secondary path adaptive filter to reduce disruption in values of the second coefficients caused by the spike in the source audio.
  • 41. A method of countering effects of ambient audio sounds by a personal audio device, the method comprising: adaptively generating an anti-noise signal from a reference signal by adapting a first adaptive filter to reduce the presence of the ambient audio sounds heard by the listener in conformity with an error signal and the reference microphone signal;combining the anti-noise signal with source audio;providing a result of the combining to a transducer;generating the reference microphone indicative of the ambient audio sounds with a reference microphone;generating the error microphone signal indicative of audio reproduced by the transducer and the ambient audio sounds with an error microphone;filtering the source audio with a secondary path adaptive filter having a secondary path response that shapes the source audio to generate filtered source audio;removing the filtered source audio from the error microphone signal to provide the error signal;adapting first coefficients of the first adaptive filter according to the reference microphone signal and the error signal;adapting second coefficients of the secondary path adaptive filter according to the source audio and the error signal; andaltering adaptation of the secondary path adaptive filter to reduce disruption in values of the second coefficients caused by the spike in the source audio if a magnitude of the source audio has a rate of change that exceeds a threshold value indicating a spike in the source audio.
  • 42. An integrated circuit for integration within a personal audio device, comprising: an output for providing an output signal to an output transducer including both source audio for playback to a listener and an anti-noise signal for countering effects of ambient audio sounds in an acoustic output of the transducer;a reference microphone input for receiving a reference microphone signal indicative of the ambient audio sounds;an error microphone input for receiving an error microphone signal indicative of the acoustic output of the transducer and the ambient audio sounds at the transducer; anda processing circuit that adaptively generates the anti-noise signal from the reference signal by adapting a first adaptive filter to reduce the presence of the ambient audio sounds heard by the listener in conformity with an error signal and the reference microphone signal, wherein the processing circuit implements a secondary path adaptive filter having a secondary path response that shapes the source audio and a combiner that removes the source audio from the error microphone signal to provide the error signal, wherein the processing circuit adapts first coefficients of the first adaptive filter according to the reference microphone signal and the error signal, wherein the processing circuit adapts second coefficients of the secondary path adaptive filter according to the source audio and the error signal, wherein if a magnitude of the source audio has a rate of change that exceeds a threshold value indicating a spike in the source audio, the processing circuit alters adaptation of the secondary path adaptive filter to reduce disruption in values of the second coefficients caused by the spike in the source audio.
Parent Case Info

This U.S. Patent Application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/787,802 filed on Mar. 15, 2013.

US Referenced Citations (296)
Number Name Date Kind
4020567 Webster May 1977 A
4926464 Schley-May May 1990 A
4998241 Brox Mar 1991 A
5018202 Takahashi May 1991 A
5021753 Chapman Jun 1991 A
5044373 Northeved et al. Sep 1991 A
5117401 Feintuch May 1992 A
5251263 Andrea et al. Oct 1993 A
5278913 Delfosse et al. Jan 1994 A
5321759 Yuan Jun 1994 A
5337365 Hamabe et al. Aug 1994 A
5359662 Yuan et al. Oct 1994 A
5377276 Terai et al. Dec 1994 A
5386477 Popovich et al. Jan 1995 A
5410605 Sawada et al. Apr 1995 A
5425105 Lo et al. Jun 1995 A
5445517 Kondou et al. Aug 1995 A
5465413 Enge et al. Nov 1995 A
5481615 Eatwell et al. Jan 1996 A
5548681 Gleaves et al. Aug 1996 A
5550925 Hori et al. Aug 1996 A
5559893 Krokstad et al. Sep 1996 A
5586190 Trantow et al. Dec 1996 A
5640450 Watanabe Jun 1997 A
5668747 Ohashi Sep 1997 A
5687075 Stothers Nov 1997 A
5696831 Inanaga et al. Dec 1997 A
5699437 Finn Dec 1997 A
5706344 Finn Jan 1998 A
5740256 Castello Da Costa et al. Apr 1998 A
5768124 Stothers et al. Jun 1998 A
5809152 Nakamura Sep 1998 A
5815582 Claybaugh et al. Sep 1998 A
5832095 Daniels Nov 1998 A
5852667 Pan et al. Dec 1998 A
5909498 Smith Jun 1999 A
5940519 Kuo Aug 1999 A
5946391 Dragwidge et al. Aug 1999 A
5991418 Kuo Nov 1999 A
6041126 Terai et al. Mar 2000 A
6118878 Jones Sep 2000 A
6181801 Puthuff et al. Jan 2001 B1
6185300 Romesburg Feb 2001 B1
6219427 Kates et al. Apr 2001 B1
6278786 McIntosh Aug 2001 B1
6282176 Hemkumar Aug 2001 B1
6304179 Lotito et al. Oct 2001 B1
6317501 Matsuo Nov 2001 B1
6418228 Terai et al. Jul 2002 B1
6434246 Kates et al. Aug 2002 B1
6434247 Kates et al. Aug 2002 B1
6445799 Taenzer et al. Sep 2002 B1
6522746 Marchok et al. Feb 2003 B1
6542436 Myllyla Apr 2003 B1
6650701 Hsiang Nov 2003 B1
6683960 Fujii et al. Jan 2004 B1
6738482 Jaber May 2004 B1
6766292 Chandran Jul 2004 B1
6768795 Feltstrom et al. Jul 2004 B2
6792107 Tucker Sep 2004 B2
6850617 Weigand Feb 2005 B1
6940982 Watkins Sep 2005 B1
7016504 Shennib Mar 2006 B1
7058463 Ruha et al. Jun 2006 B1
7103188 Jones Sep 2006 B1
7110864 Restrepo Sep 2006 B2
7181030 Rasmussen et al. Feb 2007 B2
7330739 Somayajula Feb 2008 B2
7365669 Melanson Apr 2008 B1
7368918 Henson May 2008 B2
7406179 Ryan Jul 2008 B2
7466838 Moseley Dec 2008 B1
7555081 Keele, Jr. Jun 2009 B2
7680456 Muhammad et al. Mar 2010 B2
7742746 Xiang et al. Jun 2010 B2
7742790 Konchitsky et al. Jun 2010 B2
7817808 Konchitsky et al. Oct 2010 B2
7953231 Ishida May 2011 B2
8019050 Mactavish et al. Sep 2011 B2
8085966 Amsel Dec 2011 B2
8155334 Joho et al. Apr 2012 B2
D666169 Tucker et al. Aug 2012 S
8249262 Chua et al. Aug 2012 B2
8251903 LeBoeuf et al. Aug 2012 B2
8290537 Lee et al. Oct 2012 B2
8325934 Kuo Dec 2012 B2
8331604 Saito et al. Dec 2012 B2
8374358 Buck et al. Feb 2013 B2
8379884 Horibe et al. Feb 2013 B2
8401200 Tiscareno et al. Mar 2013 B2
8442251 Jensen et al. May 2013 B2
8539012 Clark Sep 2013 B2
8559661 Tanghe Oct 2013 B2
8600085 Chen et al. Dec 2013 B2
8775172 Konchitsky et al. Jul 2014 B2
8804974 Melanson Aug 2014 B1
8831239 Bakalos Sep 2014 B2
8842848 Donaldson et al. Sep 2014 B2
8855330 Taenzer Oct 2014 B2
8908877 Abdollahzadeh Milani et al. Dec 2014 B2
8909524 Stoltz et al. Dec 2014 B2
8942976 Li et al. Jan 2015 B2
8948407 Alderson et al. Feb 2015 B2
8977545 Zeng et al. Mar 2015 B2
9020160 Gauger, Jr. Apr 2015 B2
9066176 Hendrix et al. Jun 2015 B2
9071724 Do et al. Jun 2015 B2
9076431 Kamath et al. Jul 2015 B2
9082391 Yermeche et al. Jul 2015 B2
9129586 Bajic et al. Sep 2015 B2
9203366 Eastty Dec 2015 B2
9324311 Abdollahzadeh Milani Apr 2016 B1
20010053228 Jones Dec 2001 A1
20020003887 Zhang et al. Jan 2002 A1
20030063759 Brennan et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030072439 Gupta Apr 2003 A1
20030185403 Sibbald Oct 2003 A1
20040047464 Yu et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040120535 Woods Jun 2004 A1
20040165736 Hetherington et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040167777 Hetherington et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040202333 Csermak et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040240677 Onishi et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040242160 Ichikawa et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040264706 Ray et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050004796 Trump et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050018862 Fisher Jan 2005 A1
20050117754 Sakawaki Jun 2005 A1
20050207585 Christoph Sep 2005 A1
20050240401 Ebenezer Oct 2005 A1
20060018460 McCree Jan 2006 A1
20060035593 Leeds Feb 2006 A1
20060055910 Lee Mar 2006 A1
20060069556 Nadjar et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060153400 Fujita et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060159282 Borsch Jul 2006 A1
20060161428 Fouret Jul 2006 A1
20060251266 Saunders et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070030989 Kates Feb 2007 A1
20070033029 Sakawaki Feb 2007 A1
20070038441 Inoue et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070047742 Taenzer et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070053524 Haulick et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070076896 Hosaka et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070154031 Avendano et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070208520 Zhang Sep 2007 A1
20070208981 Restrepo Sep 2007 A1
20070258597 Rasmussen et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070297620 Choy Dec 2007 A1
20080019548 Avendano Jan 2008 A1
20080101589 Horowitz et al. May 2008 A1
20080107281 Togami et al. May 2008 A1
20080144853 Sommerfeldt et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080177532 Greiss et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080181422 Christoph Jul 2008 A1
20080226098 Haulick et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080240413 Mohammed et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080240455 Inoue et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080240457 Inoue et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080269926 Xiang et al. Oct 2008 A1
20090012783 Klein Jan 2009 A1
20090034748 Sibbald Feb 2009 A1
20090041260 Jorgensen et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090046867 Clemow Feb 2009 A1
20090060222 Jeong et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090080670 Solbeck et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090086990 Christoph Apr 2009 A1
20090175461 Nakamura et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090175466 Elko et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090196429 Ramakrishnan et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090220107 Every et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090238369 Ramakrishnan et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090245529 Asada et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090254340 Sun et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090290718 Kahn et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090296965 Kojima Dec 2009 A1
20090304200 Kim et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090311979 Husted et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100002891 Shiraishi et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100014683 Maeda et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100014685 Wurm Jan 2010 A1
20100061564 Clemow et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100069114 Lee et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100082339 Konchitsky et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100098263 Pan et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100098265 Pan et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100124335 Wessling et al. May 2010 A1
20100124336 Shridhar et al. May 2010 A1
20100124337 Wertz et al. May 2010 A1
20100131269 Park et al. May 2010 A1
20100142715 Goldstein et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100150367 Mizuno Jun 2010 A1
20100158330 Guissin et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100166203 Peissig et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100195838 Bright Aug 2010 A1
20100195844 Christoph et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100207317 Iwami et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100226210 Kordis Sep 2010 A1
20100239126 Grafenberg et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100246855 Chen Sep 2010 A1
20100260345 Shridhar et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100266137 Sibbald et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100272276 Carreras et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100272283 Carreras et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100274564 Bakalos et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100284546 DeBrunner et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100291891 Ridgers et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100296666 Lin Nov 2010 A1
20100296668 Lee et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100310086 Magrath et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100322430 Isberg Dec 2010 A1
20110007907 Park et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110026724 Doclo Feb 2011 A1
20110099010 Zhang Apr 2011 A1
20110106533 Yu May 2011 A1
20110116654 Chan et al. May 2011 A1
20110129098 Delano et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110130176 Magrath et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110142247 Fellers et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110144984 Konchitsky Jun 2011 A1
20110158419 Theverapperuma et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110206214 Christoph et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110222698 Asao et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110249826 Van Leest Oct 2011 A1
20110288860 Schevciw et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110293103 Park et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110299695 Nicholson Dec 2011 A1
20110305347 Wurm Dec 2011 A1
20110317848 Ivanov et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120135787 Kusunoki et al. May 2012 A1
20120140917 Nicholson et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120140942 Loeda Jun 2012 A1
20120140943 Hendrix et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120148062 Scarlett et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120155666 Nair Jun 2012 A1
20120170766 Alves et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120179458 Oh et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120207317 Abdollahzadeh Milani et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120215519 Park et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120250873 Bakalos et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120259626 Li et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120263317 Shin et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120281850 Hyatt Nov 2012 A1
20120300955 Iseki et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120300958 Klemmensen Nov 2012 A1
20120300960 Mackay et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120308021 Kwatra et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120308025 Hendrix Dec 2012 A1
20120308026 Kamath et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120308027 Kwatra Dec 2012 A1
20120308028 Kwatra Dec 2012 A1
20120310640 Kwatra et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130010982 Elko et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130083939 Fellers et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130156238 Birch et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130195282 Ohita et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130243198 Van Rumpt Sep 2013 A1
20130243225 Yokota Sep 2013 A1
20130272539 Kim et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130287218 Alderson et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130287219 Hendrix et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130301842 Hendrix et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130301846 Alderson et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130301847 Alderson Nov 2013 A1
20130301848 Zhou et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130301849 Alderson et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130315403 Samuelsson Nov 2013 A1
20130343556 Bright Dec 2013 A1
20130343571 Rayala et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140016803 Puskarich Jan 2014 A1
20140036127 Pong et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140044275 Goldstein et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140050332 Nielsen et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140072134 Po et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140086425 Jensen et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140146976 Rundle May 2014 A1
20140169579 Azmi Jun 2014 A1
20140177851 Kitazawa et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140177890 Hojlund et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140211953 Alderson et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140226827 Abdollahzadeh Milani Aug 2014 A1
20140270222 Hendrix Sep 2014 A1
20140270223 Li Sep 2014 A1
20140270224 Zhou et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140294182 Axelsson et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140307887 Alderson Oct 2014 A1
20140307888 Alderson et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140307890 Zhou et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140314244 Yong Oct 2014 A1
20140314247 Zhang Oct 2014 A1
20140341388 Goldstein Nov 2014 A1
20140369517 Zhou et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150092953 Abdollahzadeh Milani et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150161981 Kwatra Jun 2015 A1
20150256953 Kwatra et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150365761 Alderson et al. Dec 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (56)
Number Date Country
102011013343 Sep 2012 DE
0412902 Feb 1991 EP
0756407 Jan 1997 EP
0898266 Feb 1999 EP
1691577 Aug 2006 EP
1880699 Jan 2008 EP
1947642 Jul 2008 EP
2133866 Dec 2009 EP
2216774 Aug 2010 EP
2237573 Oct 2010 EP
2395500 Dec 2011 EP
2395501 Dec 2011 EP
2551845 Jan 2013 EP
2401744 Nov 2004 GB
2436657 Oct 2007 GB
2455821 Jun 2009 GB
2455824 Jun 2009 GB
2455828 Jun 2009 GB
2484722 Apr 2012 GB
06006246 Jan 1994 JP
H06-186985 Jul 1994 JP
H06232755 Aug 1994 JP
07098592 Apr 1995 JP
07104769 Apr 1995 JP
07240989 Sep 1995 JP
07325588 Dec 1995 JP
H11305783 Nov 1999 JP
2000089770 Mar 2000 JP
2002010355 Jan 2002 JP
2004007107 Jan 2004 JP
2006217542 Aug 2006 JP
2007060644 Mar 2007 JP
2008015046 Jan 2008 JP
2010277025 Dec 2010 JP
2011061449 Mar 2011 JP
WO 9113429 Sep 1991 WO
WO 9911045 Mar 1999 WO
WO 03015074 Feb 2003 WO
WO 03015275 Feb 2003 WO
WO 2004009007 Jan 2004 WO
WO 2004017303 Feb 2004 WO
WO 2006125061 Nov 2006 WO
WO 2006128768 Dec 2006 WO
WO 2007007916 Jan 2007 WO
WO 2007011337 Jan 2007 WO
WO 2007110807 Oct 2007 WO
WO 2007113487 Nov 2007 WO
WO 2009041012 Apr 2009 WO
WO 2009110087 Sep 2009 WO
WO 2010117714 Oct 2010 WO
WO 2010131154 Nov 2010 WO
WO 2012134874 Oct 2012 WO
WO-2013106370 Jul 2013 WO
WO 2015038255 Mar 2015 WO
WO 2015088639 Jun 2015 WO
WO 2015088651 Jun 2015 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (74)
Entry
Parkins, et al., “Narrowband and broadband active control in an enclosure using the acoustic energy density”, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Jul. 2000, pp. 192-203, vol. 108, issue 1, US.
Feng, et al.., “A broadband self-tuning active noise equaliser”, Signal Processing, Oct. 1, 1997, pp. 251-256, vol. 62, No. 2, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. Amsterdam, NL.
Zhang, et al., “A Robust Online Secondary Path Modeling Method with Auxiliary Noise Power Scheduling Strategy and Norm Constraint Manipulation”, IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, IEEE Service Center, Jan. 1, 2003, pp. 45-53, vol. 11, No. 1, NY.
Lopez-Gaudana, et al., “A hybrid active noise cancelling with secondary path modeling”, 51st Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems, MWSCAS 2008, Aug. 10-13, 2008, pp. 277-280, IEEE, Knoxville, TN.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/578,567, filed Dec. 22, 2014, Kwatra, et al.
Widrow, B., et al., Adaptive Noise Cancelling; Principles and Applications, Proceedings of the IEEE, Dec. 1975, pp. 1692-1716, vol. 63, No. 13, IEEE, New York, NY, US.
Morgan, et al., A Delayless Subband Adaptive Filter Architecture, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, IEEE Service Center, Aug. 1995, pp. 1819-1829, vol. 43, No. 8, New York, NY, US.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/228,322, filed Mar. 28, 2014, Alderson, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/762,504, filed Feb. 8, 2013, Abdollahzadeh Milani, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/721,832, filed Dec. 20, 2012, Lu, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/724,656, filed Dec. 21, 2012, Lu, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/252,235, filed Apr. 14, 2014, Lu, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/968,013, filed Aug. 15, 2013, Abdollahzadeh Milani, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/924,935, filed Jun. 24, 2013, Hellman.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/896,526, filed May 17, 2013, Naderi.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/101,955, filed Dec. 10, 2013, Alderson.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/101,777, filed Dec. 10, 2013, Alderson et al.
Abdollahzadeh Milani, et al., “On Maximum Achievable Noise Reduction in ANC Systems”,2010 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing, Mar. 14-19, 2010, pp. 349-352, Dallas, TX, US.
Cohen, Israel, “Noise Spectrum Estimation in Adverse Environments: Improved Minima Controlled Recursive Averaging”, IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, Sep. 2003, pp. 1-11, vol. 11, Issue 5, Piscataway, NJ, US.
Ryan, et al., “Optimum Near-Field Performance of Microphone Arrays Subject to a Far-Field Beampattern Constraint”, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., Nov. 2000, pp. 2248-2255, 108 (5), Pt. 1, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Cohen, et al., “Noise Estimation by Minima Controlled Recursive Averaging for Robust Speech Enhancement”, IEEE Signal Processing Letters, Jan. 2002, pp. 12-15, vol. 9, No. 1, Piscataway, NJ, US.
Martin, Rainer, “Noise Power Spectral Density Estimation Based on Optimal Smoothing and Minimum Statistics”, IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, Jul. 2001, pp. 504-512, vol. 9, No. 5, Piscataway, NJ, US.
Martin, Rainer, “Spectral Subtraction Based on Minimum Statistics”, Signal Processing VII Theories and Applications, Proceedings of EUSIPCO-94, 7th European Signal Processing Conference, Sep. 13-16, 1994, pp. 1182-1185, vol. III, Edinburgh, Scotland, U.K.
Booij, et al., “Virtual sensors for local, three dimensional, broadband multiple-channel active noise control and the effects on the quiet zones”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering, ISMA 2010, Sep. 20-22, 2010, pp. 151-166, Leuven.
Kuo, et al., “Residual noise shaping technique for active noise control systems”, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95 (3), Mar. 1994, pp. 1665-1668.
Lopez-Caudana, Edgar Omar, “Active Noise Cancellation: The Unwanted Signal and the Hybrid Solution”, Adaptive Filtering Applications, Dr. Lino Garcia (Ed.), Jul. 2011, pp. 49-84, ISBN: 978-953-307-306-4, InTech.
Senderowicz, et al., “Low-Voltage Double-Sampled Delta-Sigma Converters”, IEEE Journal on Solid-State Circuits, Dec. 1997, pp. 1907-1919, vol. 32, No. 12, Piscataway, NJ.
Hurst, et al., “An improved double sampling scheme for switched-capacitor delta-sigma modulators”, 1992 IEEE Int. Symp. on Circuits and Systems, May 10-13, 1992, vol. 3, pp. 1179-1182, San Diego, CA.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/656,124, filed Mar. 12, 2015, Hendrix, et al.
Campbell, Mikey, “Apple looking into self-adjusting earbud headphones with noise cancellation tech”, Apple Insider, Jul. 4, 2013, pp. 1-10 (10 pages in pdf), downloaded on May 14, 2014 from http://appleinsider.com/articles/13/07/04/apple-looking-into-self-adjusting-earbud-headphones-with-noise-cancellation-tech.
Jin, et al. “A simultaneous equation method-based online secondary path modeling algorithm for active noise control”, Journal of Sound and Vibration, Apr. 25, 2007, pp. 455-474, vol. 303, No. 3-5, London, GB.
Erkelens, et al., “Tracking of Nonstationary Noise Based on Data-Driven Recursive Noise Power Estimation”, IEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing, Aug. 2008, pp. 1112-1123, vol. 16, No. 6, Piscataway, NJ, US.
Rao, et al., “A Novel Two State Single Channel Speech Enhancement Technique”, India Conference (INDICON) 2011 Annual IEEE, IEEE, Dec. 2011, 6 pages (pp. 1-6 in pdf), Piscataway, NJ, US.
Rangachari, et al., “A noise-estimation algorithm for highly non-stationary environments”, Speech Communication, Feb. 2006, pp. 220-231, vol. 48, No. 2. Elsevier Science Publishers.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/686,353, filed Nov. 27, 2012, Hendrix, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/795,160, filed Mar. 12, 2013, Hendrix, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/692,367, filed Dec. 3, 2012, Alderson, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/722,119, filed Dec. 20, 2012, Hendrix, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/727,718, filed Dec. 27, 2012, Alderson, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/784,018, filed Mar. 4, 2013, Alderson, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/787,906, filed Mar. 7, 2013, Alderson, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/729,141, filed Dec. 28, 2012, Zhou, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/794,931, filed Mar. 12, 2013, Lu, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/794,979, filed Mar. 12, 2013, Alderson, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/968,007, filed Aug. 15, 2013, Hendrix, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/029,159, filed Sep. 17, 2013, Li, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/062,951, filed Oct. 25, 2013, Zhou, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/197,814, filed Mar. 5, 2014, Kaller, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/210,537, filed Mar. 14, 2014, Abdollahzadeh Milani, et.
Black, John W., “An Application of Side-Tone in Subjective Tests of Microphones and Headsets”, Project Report No. NM 001 064.01.20, Research Report of the U.S. Naval School of Aviation Medicine, Feb. 1, 1954, 12 pages (pp. 1-12 in pdf), Pensacola, FL, US.
Peters, Robert W., “The Effect of High-Pass and Low-Pass Filtering of Side-Tone Upon Speaker Intelligibility”, Project Report No. NM 001 064.01.25, Research Report of the U.S. Naval School of Aviation Medicine, Aug. 16, 1954, 13 pages (pp. 1-13 in pdf), Pensacola, FL, US.
Lane, et al., “Voice Level: Autophonic Scale, Perceived Loudness, and the Effects of Sidetone”, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Feb. 1961, pp. 160-167, vol. 33, No. 2., Cambridge, MA, US.
Liu, et al., “Compensatory Responses to Loudness-shifted Voice Feedback During Production of Mandarin Speech”, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Oct. 2007, pp. 2405-2412, vol. 122, No. 4.
Paepcke, et al., “Yelling in the Hall: Using Sidetone to Address a Problem with Mobile Remote Presence Systems”, Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Oct. 16-19, 2011, 10 pages (pp. 110 in pdf), Santa Barbara, CA, US.
Therrien, et al., “Sensory Attenuation of Self-Produced Feedback: The Lombard Effect Revisited”, PLOS ONE, Nov. 2012, pp. 1-7, vol. 7, Issue 11, e49370, Ontario, Canada.
Pfann, et al., “LMS Adaptive Filtering with Delta-Sigma Modulated Input Signals,” IEEE Signal Processing Letters, Apr. 1998, pp. 95-97, vol. 5, No. 4, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ.
Toochinda, et al. “A Single-Input Two-Output Feedback Formulation for ANC Problems,” Proceedings of the 2001 American Control Conference, Jun. 2001, pp. 923-928, vol. 2, Arlington, VA.
Kuo, et al., “Active Noise Control: A Tutorial Review,” Proceedings of the IEEE, Jun. 1999, pp. 943-973, vol. 87, No. 6, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ.
Johns, et al., “Continuous-Time LMS Adaptive Recursive Filters,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, Jul. 1991, pp. 769-778, vol. 38, No. 7, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ.
Shoval, et al., “Comparison of DC Offset Effects in Four LMS Adaptive Algorithms,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Analog and Digital Processing, Mar. 1995, pp. 176-185, vol. 42, Issue 3, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ.
Mali, Dilip, “Comparison of DC Offset Effects on LMS Algorithm and its Derivatives,” International Journal of Recent Trends in Engineering, May 2009, pp. 323-328, vol. 1, No. 1, Academy Publisher.
Kates, James M., “Principles of Digital Dynamic Range Compression,” Trends in Amplification, Spring 2005, pp. 45-76, vol. 9, No. 2, Sage Publications.
Gao, et al., “Adaptive Linearization of a Loudspeaker,” IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Apr. 14-17, 1991, pp. 3589-3592, Toronto, Ontario, CA.
Silva, et al., “Convex Combination of Adaptive Filters With Different Tracking Capabilities,” IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Apr. 15-20, 2007, pp. III 925-928, vol. 3, Honolulu, HI, USA.
Akhtar, et al., “A Method for Online Secondary Path Modeling in Active Noise Control Systems,” IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, May 23-26, 2005, pp. 264-267, vol. 1, Kobe, Japan.
Davari, et al., “A New Online Secondary Path Modeling Method for Feedforward Active Noise Control Systems,” IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology, Apr. 21-24, 2008, pp. 1-6, Chengdu, China.
Lan, et al., “An Active Noise Control System Using Online Secondary Path Modeling With Reduced Auxiliary Noise,” IEEE Signal Processing Letters, Jan. 2002, pp. 16-18, vol. 9, Issue 1, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ.
Liu, et al., “Analysis of Online Secondary Path Modeling With Auxiliary Noise Scaled by Residual Noise Signal,” IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing, Nov. 2010, pp. 1978-1993, vol. 18, Issue 8, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/734,321, filed Jun. 9, 2015, Alderson, et al.
Rafaely, Boaz, “Active Noise Reducing Headset—an Overview”, The 2001 International Congress and Exhibition on Noice Control Engineering, Aug. 27-30, 2001, 10 pages (pp. 1-10 in pdf), The Netherlands.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/840,831, filed Aug. 31, 2015, Hendrix et al.
Ray, et al., “Hybrid Feedforward-Feedback Active Noise Reduction for Hearing Protection and Communication”, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, American Institute of Physics for the Acoustical Society of America, Jan. 2006, pp. 2026-2036, vol. 120, No. 4, New York, NY.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/070,564, filed Mar. 15, 2016, Zhou et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/130,271, filed Apr. 15, 2016, Hendrix et al.
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61787802 Mar 2013 US