Not applicable.
In the field of petroleum well drilling and logging, resistivity logging tools are frequently used to provide an indication of the electrical resistivity of rock formations surrounding an earth borehole. Such information regarding resistivity is useful in ascertaining the presence or absence of hydrocarbons. A typical resistivity logging tool includes a transmitter antenna and a pair of receiver antennas located at different distances from the transmitter antenna along the axis of the tool. The transmitter antenna is used to create electromagnetic fields in the surrounding formation. In turn, the electromagnetic fields in the formation induce an electrical voltage in each receiver antenna. Due to geometric spreading and absorption by the surrounding earth formation, the induced voltages in the two receiving antennas have different phases and amplitudes. Experiments have shown that the phase difference (Φ) and amplitude ratio (attenuation, A) of the induced voltages in the receiver antennas are indicative of the resistivity of the formation. The formation region (as defined by a radial distance from the tool axis) to which such a resistivity measurement pertains is a function of the frequency of the transmitter and the distance from the transmitter to the mid-point between the two receivers. Thus, one may achieve multiple radial depths of investigation of resistivity either by providing multiple transmitters at different distances from the receiver pair or by operating a single transmitter at multiple frequencies.
If a formation is electrically isotropic, the resistivities measured at the various depths of investigation by such a resistivity logging tool will be the same. However, if the resistivities corresponding to the various depths of investigation are different, such differences indicate that the formation being measured is electrically anisotropic. In electrically anisotropic formations, the anisotropy is generally attributable to extremely fine layering during the sedimentary build-up of the formation. Hence, in a formation coordinate system oriented such that the x-y plane is parallel to the formation layers and the z axis is perpendicular to the formation layers, resistivities Rx and Ry in directions x and y, respectively, are the same, but resistivity Rz in the z direction is different from Rx and Ry. Thus, the resistivity in a direction parallel to the plane of the formation (i.e., the x-y plane) is known as the horizontal resistivity, Rh, and the resistivity in the direction perpendicular to the plane of the formation (i.e., the z direction) is known as the vertical resistivity, Rv. The index of anisotropy, η, is defined as η=[Rv/Rh]1/2.
The relative dip angle, θ, is the angle between the tool axis and the normal to the plane of the formation. If the axis of a resistivity logging tool is perpendicular to the plane of an anisotropic formation (i.e., θ=0°), both the phase shift and amplitude attenuation measurements reflect only the horizontal resistivity. However, if the axis of the tool is inclined with respect to the normal of the formation plane (i.e., for non-zero relative dip angle), the rock anisotropy affects the resistivity derived from phase shift measurements (“phase shift resistivity” or RΦ) differently than it affects the resistivity derived from amplitude attenuation measurements (“amplitude attenuation resistivity” or RA). For small relative dip angles (e.g., θ less than about 45°), the difference between phase shift and amplitude attenuation resistivities is relatively small. However, this difference becomes significant for relative dip angles greater than about 50°, and the difference is large for horizontal boreholes (i.e., θ=90°).
Thus anisotropy and dip each have significant effects on resistivity logging tool measurements. As a result, resistivity logging systems should account for formation anisotropy and relative dip if accurate resistivity logs are to be obtained. In U.S. Pat. No. 6,163,155, Michael Bittar discloses one such approach that employs resistivity logging tools having tilted transmitter and/or receiver antennas. Improvements to this disclosed approach have been developed and are presented herein.
A better understanding of the various disclosed embodiments can be obtained when the following detailed description is considered in conjunction with the following drawings, in which:
While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments thereof are shown by way of example in the drawings and will herein be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the drawings and detailed description thereto are not intended to limit the invention to the particular form disclosed, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
Disclosed herein are various methods and systems for determining the horizontal resistivity, vertical resistivity, and relative dip angle of anisotropic earth formations. Some of the disclosed methods and systems measure sinusoidal variation of azimuthally sensitive resistivity logging tool measurements, determine parameters representative of the sinusoidal variation, and perform inversion based on the sinusoidal parameters. When cast in this manner, the inversion process may yield more accurate and consistent resistivity and dip angle estimates. The sinusoidal parameters preferably take the form of average and peak-to-peak measurements, but may also take other forms. Moreover, use of such sinusoidal parameters enables a condensed representation of the resistivity logging tool measurements, enabling significantly more efficient communication and storage of these measurements. The condensed representations continue to enable directional boundary detection and geosteering.
The disclosed tool configurations and operations are best understood in the context of the larger systems in which they operate. Accordingly, an illustrative logging while drilling (LWD) environment is shown in
The disclosed tool configurations and operations are best understood in the context of the larger systems in which they operate. Accordingly, an illustrative logging while drilling (LWD) environment is shown in
In wells employing acoustic telemetry for LWD, downhole sensors (including resistivity logging tool 126) are coupled to an acoustic telemetry transmitter 128 that transmits telemetry signals in the form of acoustic vibrations in the tubing wall of drill string 108. An acoustic telemetry receiver array 130 may be coupled to tubing below the top drive 110 to receive transmitted telemetry signals. One or more repeater modules 132 may be optionally provided along the drill string to receive and retransmit the telemetry signals.
An electromagnetic resistivity logging tool 126 is integrated into the bottom-hole assembly near the bit 114. As the bit extends the borehole through the formations, logging tool 126 collects measurements relating to various formation properties as well as the tool orientation and position and various other drilling conditions. The logging tool 126 may take the form of a drill collar, i.e., a thick-walled tubular that provides weight and rigidity to aid the drilling process. A telemetry sub 128 may be included to transfer tool measurements to a surface receiver 130 and to receive commands from the surface receiver. In some alternative embodiments, the telemetry sub 128 collects and stores tool measurements for later retrieval when the tool is brought back to the surface.
The orientation measurements may be performed using an azimuthal orientation indicator, which may include magnetometers, inclinometers, and/or accelerometers, though other sensor types such as gyroscopes may be used. Preferably, the tool includes a 3-axis fluxgate magnetometer and a 3-axis accelerometer. As is known in the art, the combination of those two sensor systems enables the measurement of the toolface angle, borehole inclination angle, and borehole azimuth angle. In some embodiments, the toolface and hole inclination angles are calculated from the accelerometer sensor output. The magnetometer sensor outputs are used to calculate the hole azimuth. With the toolface, the hole inclination, and the hole azimuth information, various resistivity logging tools disclosed herein can be used to steer the bit to the desirable bed. Specifically, an azimuthal response difference or the response ratio can be used effectively to enter a desired payzone or to stay within the payzone of interest.
At various times during the drilling process, the drill string 108 is removed from the borehole as shown in
The relationship between the formation coordinate system and the borehole coordinate system is shown in
The vertical resistivity is generally found to be the resistivity as measured perpendicular to the plane of the formation, and the horizontal resistivity is the resistivity as measured within the plane of the formation. Determination of each of these parameters (dip angle, strike angle, vertical resistivity, and horizontal resistivity) is desirable. Accordingly, disclosed herein is an improved downhole method and apparatus for simultaneously determining the horizontal resistivity, vertical resistivity, and relative dip angle for anisotropic earth formations. Some system embodiments employ an electromagnetic logging tool having an antenna configuration in which a transmitter antenna and a receiver antenna are oriented in non-parallel planes such that the vertical resistivity and the relative dip angle are decoupled. Preferably, either the transmitter or the receiver is mounted in a conventional orientation in a first plane that is normal to the tool axis, and the other antenna is mounted in a second plane that is not parallel to the first plane. The disclosed embodiments are suitable for LWD applications, and are also applicable to wireline and possibly other applications.
Also disclosed herein are an improved downhole method and apparatus for steering a downhole tool during directional drilling operations in order to maintain the borehole within a desired geological formation by providing an advance indication of the resistivity of a given bed before entry into that bed. In some embodiments, this steering capability is achieved by providing transmitter and receiver antennas that are mounted in non-parallel planes and computing the azimuthal difference or the ratio of the phase-based or amplitude-based responses of the receiver antennas. With such an antenna arrangement, the azimuthal ratio or difference of the responses indicates whether the resistivity of an approaching bed is higher or lower than the resistivity of the present bed. With such information, the driller may steer the drilling apparatus in order to maintain the borehole in a desired geological bed.
It should be appreciated that logging tool 10 also has the requisite electronic circuitry for processing the signals received by the receivers antennas as disclosed further below, thereby converting the received signals into a log or another indication of formation resistivity. It should also be appreciated that the processed signals can be recorded within the electronics section of tool 10 or may be coneyed to the surface by a telemetry system for concurrent processing and readout at the surface.
The distance between the coils used for R1 and R2 is preferably six inches along the longitudinal axis of tool 10, but other receiver spacings may also be used. The distance between the receiver pair and the successively spaced transmitters will vary in some applications, as discussed hereinafter in greater detail. A preferred configuration contains a distance between T1 and R1/R2 of 12 inches/18 inches; a distance between T2 and R1/R2 of 24 inches/30 inches; and a distance between T3 and R1/R2 of 36 inches/42 inches. In the foregoing sentence, it should be understood that the term “12 inches/18 inches,” for example, indicates that the distance between T1 and R1 is 12 inches and that the distance between T1 and R2 is 18 inches, based upon R1 and R2 being six inches apart. Such spacing configurations are sometimes referred to herein using an abbreviated expression of, for example, “12/18.”
Still referring to the illustrative logging tool of
The receiver antennas R1 and R2 are respectively connected to amplifiers 40 and 42, which are connected, respectively, to mixer circuits 44 and 46. Oscillators F1, F2, F3 . . . FN are coupled to an oscillator select circuit 48, the output of which is connected to the inputs of mixer circuits 44 and 46. Oscillator select circuit 48 interfaces to microprocessor 32 to determine which oscillater is to be coupled to the mixer circuits.
The respective outputs of mixer circuits 44 and 46 drive low pass filters 50 and 52, respectively, the outputs of which drive amplitude measurement circuits 54 and 56, respectively. The outputs of amplitude measurement circuits 54 and 56 are connected to a multiplexer circuit 60. The outputs of low pass filter circuits 50 and 52 are also connected to the inputs of a relative phase measurement circuit 62, the output of which is fed into multiplexer 60. Under control of the microprocessor 32, multiplexer 60 forwards a selected one of its inputs to A/D converter 36 for sampling and conversion into a digital value that the microprocessor can store and process. The microprocessor 32 further acquires tool orientation measurements from orientation sensors 70, and determines a tool orientation to be associated with each resistivity measurement derived from the sampled receiver signals.
In the operation of the device and circuitry illustrated in
It should also be appreciated that the frequencies F1, F2, F3 . . . FN could all be the same frequency, though some embodiments employ different frequencies to account for increased power loss in the formation for larger transmitter-receiver antenna spacings. Preferably, the individual transmitter antennas fire in sequence, though in some alternative embodiments, simultaneous operation of the transmitter antennas is possible. However, those skilled in the art will recognize that simultaneous transmission of all of the transmitter signals will usually require additional filters and processing circuitry to enable the instrument to properly discriminate between the different frequencies.
In addition to the antenna configuration of
While the antenna configurations of
The antenna configurations of
Though not suitable for providing improved spatial resolution,
By combining symmetric and differential antenna configuration designs, it is possible to create antenna designs that provide compensated measurements, i.e., measurements that are protected against errors attributable to temperature-induced drift in the electronic circuit components.
To enable simultaneous measurement of resistivity, anisotropy, and dip, the disclosed logging tools and methods employ one or more tilted antennas to obtain azimuthally-sensitive resistivity measurements. The circumference of the tool (or borehole) is divided into azimuthal bins as shown in
The condensed representation of resistivity measurements at a given depth in the borehole may be useful for storage and telemetry communications. More importantly, however, is the use of these characteristic parameters in the inversion process for determining vertical and horizontal resistivities and formation dip. When an inversion process employing only the maximum value or mean value is compared to an inversion process that employs a mean value and a max-to-min difference value, a significantly improved accuracy is observed and the determined formation characteristics are more resistant to measurement noise.
As an illustrative example of how the inversion equations may be derived, consider the antenna configuration of
MT
MT
where
It=the current in the transmitter coil,
At=the cross-sectional area of the transmitter coil, and
θ=the relative dip angle (the angle between the tool axis and the normal to the formation).
As shown by Luling, M. G., “Processing and Modeling 2-MHz Resistivity Tools in Dipping, Laminated, Anisotropic Formations,” SPWLA 35th Annual Logging Symposium, Jun. 19-22, 1994, the HMD produces magnetic fields Hhx and Hhz, and the VMD produces magnetic fields Hvx and Hvz as follows:
At the receiver antenna, the Hz field (the field along the z-axis of the tool) is given by the equation
Hz=(Hhx+Hvx)sin θ+(Hvz+Hhz)cos θ [7a]
and the Hx field (the field perpendicular to the z-axis of the tool and in the x-z plane of the formation coordinate system) is given by the equation
Hx=(Hhx+Hvx)cos θ−(Hvz+Hhz)sin θ. [7b]
For a receiver antenna tilted at an angle of ξR and azimuth of α (see
V=iωArμ(Hz cos ξR+Hx sin ξR cos α+Hy sin ξR sin α) [8]
where Ar is the cross-sectional area of the receiver coil. From the foregoing equations, it can be shown that when the transmitter and receiver antennas are parallel, the induced receiver voltage is
Equation [9] shows that the induced voltage, V, depends on kh and β. In turn, kh depends on σh; and β depends on σh, σv, and θ. These relationships indicate that σv and θ are dependent, and this dependency prevents convergence of a simultaneous solution for σh, σv, and θ. To break this dependency and enable a solution for σh, σv, and θ, it is desirable to have the transmitter antenna and receiver antenna tilted at different angles. Although the above formulation is for an coaxial transmitter with a tilted receiver, the theory of reciprocity provides that the same result also applies to a tilted transmitter with an untilted receiver. Indeed, both the transmitter and the receiver may be tilted, provided that the respective angles of tilt are not the same, i.e., ξT≠ξR.
The sinusoidal-like variation in
In block 1704, the logging tool drives the selected transmit antenna at the selected frequency, and measures the receiver responses. The logging tool further measures the tool position and orientation to be associated with the measured receiver responses. In various embodiments, the receiver responses may be absolute phase shift, absolute attenuation, differential phase shift, and/or differential attenuation. In block 1706, the position and orientation information is used to associate the measured receiver responses with an azimuthal bin. If multiple measurements are obtained for a given bin, the measurements may be combined, e.g., by averaging. In block 1708, a test is made to determine if there are more measurements to be made at this position in the borehole (e.g., a test to see if the measured tool position is still within a predetermined range). If so, blocks 1702-1708 are repeated.
In optional block 1710, the logging tool determines compensated phase and/or attenuation measurements as previously described with respect to
In block 1714, the characteristic parameters are inverted to determine one or more of the formation strike angle, the formation dip angle, the formation resistivity (horizontal or vertical), and the formation anisotropy. The determined formation measurements are stored in the form of a log, which may be optionally displayed and updated in block 1716. In block 1718, a test is made to determine whether the logging should continue (e.g., whether the drilling process is ongoing), and if so, blocks 1702-1718 are repeated.
The inversion process can take the form of a look-up table-based search with interpolation, but is preferably performed with a closed-form forward model of the tool responses that are expected in response to estimates of the formation dip, resistivity, and anisotropy. Beginning with random, arbitrary, or in some cases, predetermined, estimates of the formation dip, resistivity, and anisotropy, the inversion process repeatedly updates these estimates until the sinusoidal parameter values predicted by the forward model match the measured sinusoidal parameter values to within some predetermined threshold. The update routine may, for example, employ the Levenberg-Marquardt method discussed by Tianfei Zhu and Larry D. Brown, “Two-dimensional Velocity Inversion and Synthetic Seismogram Computation,” Geophysics, vol. 52, no. 1, January 1987, p. 37-50.
In some embodiments, the measured characteristic parameter values are the mean and the max-to-min difference values of the differential phase shift measured as a function of azimuth at each of three or more transmit frequencies. In other embodiments, the characteristic parameter values are the mean and max-to-min difference values of the differential attenuation measured as a function of azimuth at three or more transmitter-to-receiver spacings. In yet other embodiments, both phase and attenuation information are measured and used as the basis of the inversion. Other characteristic parameter values are possible and may be used.
Turning now to the geosteering aspect of this system,
It is noted here that the tool response to a boundary between isotropic formations exhibits a sinusoidal response much like those shown in
In embodiments that condense the azimuthal resistivity measurement information into sinusoidal parameters such as a mean, a max-to-min difference, and peak orientation indicator, the max-to-min difference and the peak orientation indicator can be used as the steering signal. A max-to-mean difference and peak orientation indicator could be employed to similar effect. In some alternative embodiments, a ratio of max-to-min value is employed. The drilling operator may combine the steering signal information with tool position and orientation measurements and knowledge derived from test holes or seismic surveys to formulate directional steering decisions. The steering signals described herein are expected to be particularly effective at enabling a drilling operator to effectively detect and enter a payzone and at enabling the drilling operator to maintain a borehole course that maximizes the borehole interval in the payzone.
Although the foregoing specific details describe a preferred embodiment of this invention, persons reasonably skilled in the art of petroleum well drilling and logging will recognize that various changes may be made in the details of the method and apparatus of this invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims. Therefore, it should be understood that this invention is not to be limited to the specific details shown and described herein.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2007/064221 | 3/16/2007 | WO | 00 | 11/5/2008 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/115229 | 9/25/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2901689 | Barrett | Aug 1959 | A |
3014177 | Hungerford et al. | Dec 1961 | A |
3187252 | Hungerford | Jun 1965 | A |
3286163 | Holser et al. | Nov 1966 | A |
3412815 | Holser | Nov 1968 | A |
3510757 | Huston | May 1970 | A |
3539911 | Youmans et al. | Nov 1970 | A |
3561007 | Gouilloud et al. | Feb 1971 | A |
3808520 | Runge | Apr 1974 | A |
3982176 | Meador | Sep 1976 | A |
4302722 | Gianzero | Nov 1981 | A |
4319191 | Meador et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4360777 | Segesman | Nov 1982 | A |
4536714 | Clark | Aug 1985 | A |
4553097 | Clark | Nov 1985 | A |
4610313 | Daly et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4611173 | Bravenec et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4636731 | Savage et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4651101 | Barber et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4697190 | Oswald | Sep 1987 | A |
4700142 | Kuckes | Oct 1987 | A |
4780857 | Lyle et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4785247 | Meador et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4791373 | Kuckes | Dec 1988 | A |
4808929 | Oldigs | Feb 1989 | A |
RE32913 | Clark | Apr 1989 | E |
4845433 | Kleinberg | Jul 1989 | A |
4873488 | Barber et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4899112 | Clark et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4933640 | Kuckes | Jun 1990 | A |
4940943 | Bartel et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4945987 | Wittrisch | Aug 1990 | A |
4949045 | Clark et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4962490 | Lyle et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4980643 | Gianzero et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5089779 | Rorden | Feb 1992 | A |
5115198 | Gianzero et al. | May 1992 | A |
5160925 | Dailey et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5200705 | Clark et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5210495 | Hapashey et al. | May 1993 | A |
5230386 | Wu et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5239448 | Perkins et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5241273 | Luling | Aug 1993 | A |
5243290 | Safinya | Sep 1993 | A |
5260662 | Rorden | Nov 1993 | A |
5278507 | Bartel et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5329448 | Rosthal | Jul 1994 | A |
5332048 | Underwood et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5343152 | Kuckes | Aug 1994 | A |
5389881 | Bittar et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5402068 | Meador et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5424293 | Sinclair et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5428293 | Sinclair et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5442294 | Rorden | Aug 1995 | A |
5448227 | Orban et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5475309 | Hong et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5485089 | Kuckes | Jan 1996 | A |
5501285 | Lamine et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5508616 | Sato et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5530358 | Wisler et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5550473 | Klein | Aug 1996 | A |
5563512 | Mumby | Oct 1996 | A |
5589775 | Kuckes | Dec 1996 | A |
5594343 | Clark et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5602541 | Comeau et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5656930 | Hagiwara | Aug 1997 | A |
5720355 | Lamine et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5725059 | Kuckes et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5757191 | Gianzero | May 1998 | A |
5781436 | Forgang et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5813480 | Zaleski, Jr. et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5854991 | Gupta et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5864058 | Chen-Kang | Jan 1999 | A |
5886526 | Wu | Mar 1999 | A |
5892460 | Jerabek et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5923170 | Kuckes | Jul 1999 | A |
5999883 | Gupta et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6044325 | Chakravarthy et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6057784 | Schaaf et al. | May 2000 | A |
6147496 | Strack et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6150822 | Hong et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6158532 | Logan et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6163155 | Bittar | Dec 2000 | A |
6181138 | Hagiwara et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6191586 | Bittar | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6218841 | Wu | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218842 | Bittar | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6230822 | Sullivan et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6297639 | Clark et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304086 | Minerbo et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6351127 | Rosthal et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6353321 | Bittar | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6359438 | Bittar | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6373254 | Dion et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6466020 | Kuckes et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6476609 | Bittar | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6538447 | Bittar | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6540033 | Sullivan et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6541979 | Omeragic | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6543312 | Sullivan et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6566881 | Omeragic et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6571886 | Sullivan | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6573722 | Rosthal et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6614229 | Clark et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6626251 | Sullivan et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6648082 | Schultz et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6691802 | Schultz et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6698536 | Moran et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6710600 | Kopecki et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6736222 | Kuckes et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6777940 | Macune | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6778127 | Stolarczyk et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6810331 | Bittar et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6814162 | Moran et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6850068 | Chemali et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6863127 | Clark et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6885943 | Bittar et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6900640 | Fanini et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6911824 | Bittar | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6944546 | Xiao et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6958610 | Gianzero et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7017662 | Schultz et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7019528 | Bittar | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7038455 | Beste et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7046010 | Hu et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7066280 | Sullivan et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7138803 | Bittar | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7202670 | Omeragic et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7207215 | Spross et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7227363 | Gianzero et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7265552 | Bittar | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7316277 | Jeffryes | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7345487 | Bittar et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7394257 | Martinez et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7427863 | Bittar | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7557579 | Bittar | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7557580 | Bittar | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7657377 | Sinclair et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7659722 | Bittar | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7786733 | Seydoux et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7848887 | Yang et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
20030051914 | Bittar | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055565 | Omeragic | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030062197 | Moran et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030076107 | Fanini et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040196047 | Fanini et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050006090 | Chemali et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050024060 | Bittar | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050083063 | Omeragic et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050140373 | Li et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050218898 | Fredette et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060011385 | Seydoux et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015256 | Hassan et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060125479 | Chemali et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060244455 | Bittar | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060272859 | Pastusek et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070186639 | Spross et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070272442 | Pastusek et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070278008 | Kuckes et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080018895 | Opsal | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080136419 | Seydoux et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090015260 | Bittar | Jan 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0527089 | Feb 1993 | EP |
0814349 | Dec 1997 | EP |
0840142 | May 1998 | EP |
0093519 | Jul 1999 | EP |
2110687 | Aug 2011 | EP |
2 699 286 | Jun 1994 | FR |
2 279 149 | Dec 1994 | GB |
2468734 | Sep 2010 | GB |
2043656 | Sep 1995 | RU |
2107313 | Mar 1998 | RU |
2279697 | Oct 2003 | RU |
2305300 | Aug 2007 | RU |
WO-9531736 | Nov 1995 | WO |
WO9800733 | Jan 1998 | WO |
WO-9845733 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO-0050926 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO0155748 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO03069120 | Aug 2003 | WO |
WO-2006030489 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO-2007145859 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO-2008115229 | Sep 2008 | WO |
WO-2009029517 | Mar 2009 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100156424 A1 | Jun 2010 | US |