This application provides a retention of a rocker arm spring.
A valve train rocker arm is subject to rigorous use, actuating many thousands or millions of time over the lifetime of an engine's operation. The rocker arm “rocks” for valve lift and lowering. Over time, repetitive stress can lead to rocker arm failure.
The methods and devices disclosed herein overcome the above disadvantages and improves the art by way of a retainer and a rocker arm with reduced stress points.
A retainer comprises an inner tubular portion comprising an inner circular edge having a radius R3. An annular retaining surface is connected to the tubular portion. The annular retaining surface comprises an area bounded by an outer edge and the inner circular edge. The outer edge is bounded by an arc AD comprising a first radius R1, a sector CB comprising a second radius R2, where R1>R2, a first chord DC connecting the arc AD to the sector CB, and a second chord BA connecting the arc AD to the sector CB.
A rocker arm assembly comprises a rocker arm body configured to actuate a valve in a valve train. The rocker arm body comprises a ledge, a mounting body, and an extension. A spring comprises a coil wrapped around the mounting body. A first arm extends from the coil and abuts the extension. A second arm extends from the coil and abuts the ledge. The spring is tensioned between the extension and the ledge. A retainer comprises an inner tubular portion fitted to the mounting body. The inner tubular portion comprises an inner circular edge having a radius R3. An annular retaining surface is connected to the tubular portion. The annular retaining surface comprises an area bounded by an outer edge and the inner circular edge. The outer edge being bounded by an arc AD comprising a first radius R1, a sector CB comprising a second radius R2, where R1>R2, a first chord DC connecting the arc AD to the sector CB, and a second chord BA connecting the arc AD to the sector CB. The retaining surface abuts the coil to retain the coil against the rocker arm body, but the retaining surface does not abut the first arm.
Additional objects and advantages will be set forth in part in the description which follows, and in part will be obvious from the description, or may be learned by practice of the disclosure. The objects and advantages will also be realized and attained by means of the elements and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims.
Reference will now be made in detail to the examples which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Wherever possible, the same reference numbers will be used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts. Directional references such as “front” and “rear” are for ease of reference.
In
Comparing
It is desirable to secure the springs 110, 120, 130 with respect to the rocker arm body 400 without play towards and away from the rocker arm body 400. So, in
The retaining surface 510 of retainer 500 has crescents of space for eliminating pressure points between the retaining surface 510 and spring arms 111, 121, 131. The extent of the crescents is chosen to maximize retention of the spring coil, while minimize coil fanning and pressure points.
To describe the curve of the crescent retainer 500, it is helpful to consider the retaining surface 510 with respect to a geometric circle G, shown in broken and solid lines in
In use, the rocker arm body is used in conjunction with a cam rail. A spinning cam pushes on a bearing 300 mounted to a bearing axle 320. The bearing axle 320 can be integrally formed with the extension 200. The extension 200 passes through a slot 450 in the rocker arm body 400. The spring 110, 120, 130 biases the extension 200 against one end of the slot 450. Opposing forces from the cam rail selectively move the extension 200 towards the opposite end of the slot 450. The extension 200 is coupled to the bearing axle 320 to move with the bearing axle 320 when the cam presses on the bearing 300.
The force of the cam pressing on the bearing 300 opposes the spring force biased between the ledge 410 and the extension 200. The opposing force from the cam transfers to the spring 110, 120, 130, and impacts the coil 140 of the spring, pushing on it. The retainer 500 resists the forces transferred to the spring 110, 120, 130 without pushing on the first arm 111, 121, 131. The crescents of material removed from the retainer, and hence the outer edge of the annular retaining surface 510, are selected to balance retention function, security of fitment, and elimination of interference with the first arm 111. 121, 131.
In use, as shown in
Other implementations will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the disclosure.
This is a § 371 National Stage entry of PCT/US2016/027994 filed Apr. 15, 2016, which claims the benefit of priority of U.S. provisional application No. 62/149,504, filed Apr. 17, 2015 and U.S. provisional application No. 62/153,131, filed Apr. 27, 2015, all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2016/027994 | 4/15/2016 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2016/168770 | 10/20/2016 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6532920 | Sweetnam et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
7673605 | Hiramatsu | Mar 2010 | B2 |
8215275 | Church | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8635980 | Church | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8726862 | Zurface et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8752513 | Zurface et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
20070193543 | Best | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080245330 | Deierlein et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20100300389 | Manther et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110226208 | Zurface | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20130233265 | Zurface et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130255612 | Zurface et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130306013 | Zurface et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130312506 | Nielsen et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130312681 | Schultheis et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130312686 | Zurface et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130312687 | Zurface et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130312688 | VanDeusen | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130312689 | Zurface et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140290608 | Radulescu | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140305765 | Serkh | Oct 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10344406 | Apr 2005 | DE |
0101222 | Aug 1982 | EP |
2418359 | Feb 2012 | EP |
59046346 | Mar 1984 | JP |
2009509081 | Mar 2009 | JP |
2013522542 | Jun 2013 | JP |
10-2008-0026841 | Mar 2008 | KR |
WO-2011116331 | Sep 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2016/027994 dated Jul. 26, 2016, pp. 1-10. |
Radulescu et al., “Switching Response Optimization for Cylinder Deactivation with Type II Passenger Car Applications,” SAE International, Technical Paper 2014-01-1704, Published Apr. 1, 2014, pp. 1-16. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180291772 A1 | Oct 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62149504 | Apr 2015 | US | |
62153131 | Apr 2015 | US |