This application claims the benefit of the filing date of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/765,606, filed Feb. 6, 2006, and entitled ROD CONTOURING APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR A PERCUTANEOUS PEDICLE SCREW EXTENSIONS, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
This application relates to U.S. application Ser. No. 10/868,075, entitled “Methods and Devices For Improving Percutaneous Access In Minimally Invasive Surgeries” and filed on Jun. 15, 2004, U.S. application Ser. No. 11/178,035, entitled “System and Method For Orthopedic Implant Configuration” and filed on Jul. 8, 2005, and U.S. application Ser. No. 11/202,487, entitled “System and Method For Percutaneous Spinal Access” and filed on Aug. 12, 2005, and International Application No. PCT/US2004/036640 and filed on Nov. 4, 2004, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates to methods and devices for improving percutaneous access in minimally invasive surgeries, and more particularly to methods and devices that provide a template for the extracorporeal selection and contouring of connecting devices based on landmark locations within the body, and the percutaneous transfer of connecting devices and instruments, particularly such selected or contoured devices, within one or more access channels to positions defined by particular locations within the body.
It is well known that traditional surgical procedures in locations deep within a patient's body require a long incision, extensive muscle stripping, prolonged retraction of muscles for visualization, and denervation and devascularization of the adjacent tissue. These procedures result in extensive tissue traumatization and consequently in prolonged recovery time, risk of infections, high hospitalization costs, pain that can be more severe than the pain due to the initial ailment, and in some cases permanent scarring. In minimally invasive surgical procedures, portals are used to access the locations deep in the patient's body. The use of portals rather than a long incision causes less trauma to the adjacent tissue, reduces the recovery time and pain and may be performed in some case under only local anesthesia. The avoidance of general anesthesia reduces post-operative recovery time and the risk of complications.
Minimally invasive surgical procedures are especially desirable for spine surgeries because spine pathologies are located deep within the body without clear muscle planes and there is danger of damaging the adjacent neural and vascular tissues. In treating the majority of spinal pathologies, the spinal muscles are stripped from the bony elements of the spine followed by laminectomy to expose the dura, the nerve roots, and the discs. The incision has to be wide enough and the tissues have to be retracted to maintain a channel from the skin to the floor of the spinal canal that will allow direct visualization. This is similar to an open surgery approach to the knee to expose the menisci versus minimally invasive alternatives such as an arthroscopy which uses 1 centimeter portals under illuminated magnification which results in improved visualization, reduced postoperative knee pain, recovery time, and the destruction of healthy tissue. The destruction to the spinal structures is even more extensive during fusion procedures, which require more lateral tissue dissection and exposure to access the transverse processes and pedicles for placement of pedicle screws, rod constructs for stability, and bone graft under direct vision.
Furthermore, in spine fusion procedures, connecting elements, such as rods, plates or wires are placed and fixed between two or more locations of the spine. Placement of these connecting elements requires open surgery, which is currently one of the major limitations of other percutaneous cannula access methodologies. Accordingly there is a need for inserting and placing these connecting elements between two or more separate spinal locations without performing open surgery.
A wide variety of orthopedic implants exist. Such implants are typically anchored to bones within the body. Every person has different bone structure; accordingly, implants must vary considerably in geometry to meet the needs of a broad range of patients. Connecting elements are an example of an orthopedic implant that often must be specially configured, adjusted, or selected based on the internal anatomical configuration of the patient's bone structure. Although visualization methods such as X-Rays and fluoroscopy can be utilized to help determine bone geometry, contact with the bones must often be made in order to provide a sufficiently accurate measurement of bony landmarks.
Trial fittings of an implant within the body are often required. In open treatment procedures, access to the operation site is typically sufficiently large to allow fitting and adjustment of implants such as connecting devices within the body. This is not feasible in minimally invasive surgical procedures because the surgeon has neither the physical access nor visibility required to test and adjust the device in situ.
According to new minimally invasive surgical (MIS) procedures, many orthopedic implants can be secured to bone through relatively small incisions. Unfortunately, if a larger incision must be made to permit bone measurement and implant selection or configuration, most of the beneficial effects of the MIS implantation procedure will be lost. Accordingly, there is a need in the art for bony landmark measurement and implant selection or configuration methods that can be carried out through small incisions. Such methods should be relatively simple and quick to perform, with comparatively simple instrumentation.
Furthermore, there is a need to provide a system, apparatus and method that solves the combined problems of using minimally invasive surgery for inserting and fastening implants such as connecting elements to bone locations such as spinal vertebrae and also allows configuration of the implants based on internal landmarks locations without performing open surgery.
In one aspect, the invention features apparatus for use as connectable portals in percutaneous minimally invasive surgery performed within a patient's body. The apparatus includes a first elongated hollow tube having a proximal end and a distal end and defining a first working channel between the proximal end and the distal end when placed within the body cavity and a second working channel transverse to said first working channel comprising two slots along the length of the hollow tube.
In another aspect, the invention features at least a second elongated hollow tube having a proximal end and a distal end and defining a first working channel between the proximal end and the distal end when placed within the body cavity and a second working channel transverse to said first working channel comprising two slots along the length of the hollow tube.
In another aspect of the invention the first and second tubes are sized for delivering carrier devices, surgical instruments, medical devices, fixation devices, vertebral disc replacement devices, interbody devices, fixation tools, connecting devices, connecting tools, tissue, grafting material, or illumination devices, to a pathology location within the body cavity through either the first or second working channels. The surgical instruments may be scissors, scalpels, saws, drills, tissue dilators, biting and grabbing instruments, curettes, knot tying, or cautery. The fixation devices may be screws, hooks, loops, pins, nuts, washers, wires, sutures, or staples. The fixation tools may be screw drivers, pushers, holders, wrenches, staplers, or knot tiers. The connecting devices may be plates, rods, wires, vertebral disc replacements, interbody fusion devices, or articulating versions thereof. The connecting tools may be connecting tools carriers, pushers, screw drivers, and wrenches. The illumination devices may be light sources, fiber optic cables, infrared detectors, magnification devices, and microscopes. The tubes may further comprise a mechanism for engaging and disengaging a fixation device. The tubes may further comprise separable components that can be assembled and disassembled while at least partially within the body.
In an embodiment of the invention the first tube and second tube may comprise appendages at the distal end configured to releasably engage features of the fixation device and secure to the fixation device.
In an aspect of the method of the invention, the first tube comprises a first opening extending the entire width of the first tube and being located in a portion of the first tube within the first body cavity and wherein a cutting tool is used to incise tissue around the first body cavity through the first opening. The method may also include inserting a second elongated hollow tube within a second body cavity of the patient adjacent to the first body cavity, wherein the second tube has a proximal end and a distal end and defining a second working channel between the proximal end and the distal end when placed within the second body cavity. The method also includes incising tissue between the first body cavity and the second body cavity, thereby forming a path extending from the first body cavity to the second body cavity, then inserting a connecting device into or through the first tube and then transferring the connecting device from the first tube to the second tube through the path. The method also includes attaching a first end of the connecting device to a first bone within the first body cavity via a first fixation device and attaching a second end of the connecting device to a second bone within the second body cavity via a second fixation device. The first bone within the first body cavity may be a first vertebra, and the second bone within the second body cavity may be a second vertebra. The first and second fixation devices may be screws, hooks, loops, pins, nuts, washers, wires, sutures, or staples and in a preferred embodiment is a multiaxial pedicle screw. The connecting device may be plates, rods, wires or articulating versions thereof and in a preferred embodiment is a rod. The tissue between the first and the second body cavities may be a lumbodorsal fascia and the path is located either above or below the lumbodorsal fascia. The first and second tubes are sized for delivering carrier devices, surgical instruments, fixation devices, fixation tools, connecting devices, connecting tools, tissue, grafting material, or illumination devices, to a pathology location within the body cavity. The method may also include inserting additional elongated tubes within additional body cavities of the patient adjacent to the first and second body cavities. The method may also include making a second incision on a second location of the patient's skin, then advancing a second guide wire through the second incision, through tissue underlying the second location and into a second underlying bone, then forming the second body cavity around the second guide wire and finally removing the first and second tubes from the first and second body cavities and closing the first and the second incisions.
The present invention has applications in a wide range of surgical procedures, and in particular in spinal procedures such as laminotomy, laminectomy, foramenotomy, facetectomy and discectomy, fusions or disc replacements using an anterior, posterior, postero-lateral, or a lateral approach to the disc space, facet, laminas, pedicles, or transverse processes. The devices and instruments of the present invention have application to surgical techniques that permit each of these several types of surgical procedures to be performed via a single or multiple sequential working channels. The present invention also has application to surgical techniques for preparing a disc space for insertion of an implant into the disc space.
In another aspect, the invention performs a function similar to a surgical navigation system with simple manual instruments that create a mechanical analog of the body target sites outside the body. This invention further provides a convenient template for the shaping of an implantable device to mate with target body sites without requiring a full surgical exposure to access the target body sites. This invention also provides a suitable level of positional control of the template to allow the surgeon discretion in positioning the template and shaping the implantable device.
In a still further aspect the invention provides an apparatus and a method for creating an extracorporeal set of reference features that replicates the spatial positioning of a set of target sites located inside the body, outside of the body. The target sites are preferably anchor sites for an implantable fixation device, but could be preferred locations for delivering therapeutic agents or anatomic locations.
In one embodiment, the invention creates extracorporeal references of the preferred anchor sites within the body for a fixation member to attach to bone anchors applied to the spine. This is accomplished by attaching elongate members to each bone anchors. Typically the members are attached to a first portion of a bone anchor that articulates with respect to a second portion of the bone anchor that is anchored to the bone. In the case of the application of the invention to a spine surgery, the anchors can be a pedicle screw or a pedicle hook for example.
The details of one or more embodiments of the invention are set forth in the accompanying drawings and description below. Other features, objects and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following description of the preferred embodiments, the drawings and from the claims.
Various embodiments of the present invention will now be discussed with reference to the appended drawings. It is appreciated that these drawings depict only typical embodiments of the invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope.
In this application, an “anatomic point” is a location within the body. An anatomic point need not be located on any specific anatomic structure. When applied to anatomy, “proximal” refers to a position relatively closer to the center of the body, and “distal” refers to a position relatively further from the center of the body. However, when referred to a tool or similar implement, “proximal” refers to a portion relatively nearer the operator of the tool or similar implement, and “distal” refers to a portion relatively further from the operator.
The phrase “spatial transformation” refers to any mathematical procedure in which one or more coordinates can be transformed in a manner that permits the original coordinates to be determined based on the results of the transformation. Accordingly, a spatial transformation may involve any combination of translation and rotation of the original coordinates, as long as the transformation can be analytically reversed to permit the original coordinates to be obtained. A “translational spatial transformation” is a spatial transformation in which the original coordinates are all uniformly translated along the same vector.
The term “mate” refers to any type of connection in which cooperating features engage each other to restrict relative motion of the mating parts. The term “couple” is not limited to fixed attachment, but also includes sliding attachment and the like. The term “receive” does not require one item to completely capture another; rather, one item receives another if the first item engages the second item in a manner that restricts relative motion of the items. The term “substantially parallel” means that a range of adjustment is available for limited relative movement of the assemblies, as the surgeon requires, to position the assemblies and also encompasses normal mechanical tolerances and deflections that create variance from geometrically parallel assemblies.
Referring to
As shown, the portion of the spine 10 illustrated in
As shown, the first vertebra 24 has a body 28 with a generally disc-like shape and two pedicles 30 that extend posteriorly from the body 28. A posterior arch, or lamina 32, extends between the posterior ends of the pedicles 30 to couple the pedicles 30 together. The first vertebra 24 also has a pair of transverse processes 34 that extend laterally from the pedicles 30 generally along the medial/lateral axis 20, and a spinous process 36 that extends from the lamina 32 along the posterior direction 18.
Similarly, the second vertebra 26 has a body 48 from which two pedicles 50 extend posteriorly. A posterior arch, or lamina 52, extends between the posterior ends of the pedicles 50 to couple the pedicles 50 together. The second vertebra 26 also has a pair of transverse processes 54, each of which extends from the corresponding pedicle 50 generally along the medial/lateral axis 20, and a spinous process 56 that extends from the lamina 52 along the posterior direction 18.
The vertebrae 24, 26 and/or the intervertebral disc (not shown) between them, may be damaged or diseased in some manner that makes it desirable to secure the vertebrae 24, 26 together in a manner that prevents relative motion between them. Accordingly, posterior spinal fusion may be employed to secure the pedicles 30 and 50 together in a geometrical relationship that produces a fused spinal section with an appropriate bio-mechanical function. In order to allow the surgeon to provide a proper geometrical relationship between vertebrae, multi-axial pedicle screws and contoured rods connecting the screws have become the gold standard for spinal fusion hardware.
As further illustrated in
Referring to
Referring to
Each of the dilators 80, 82, 88 has a bore sized to receive the proximal end 74 of the corresponding guide wire 70, 72, or 78, so that the dilators 80, 82, 88 are able to slide along the guide wires 70, 72, 78 toward the distal ends 74, thereby spreading the tissues away from the guide wires 70, 72, 78. As an alternative to the guide wires 70, 72, 78 and the dilators 80, 82, 88, a variety of other guiding devices and/or dilation devices may be used within the scope of the present invention.
Referring to
Each distal end 114 has a taper 122 that provides a reduction in the diameter of the cannula 100, 102, or 108 toward the distal end 114.
The cannulas 143 are inserted around the guide wires 70, 72, 78. The cannulas 143 may be placed by withdrawing dilators 80, 82, 88, inserting the cannulas 143 around the proximal ends 74 of the guide wires 70, 72, 78, inserting the distal ends 94 of the dilators 80, 82, 88 into the ports 116 of the proximal end 112 of the cannulas 143, and then advancing the dilators 80, 82, 88 along the guide wires 70, 72, 78 to urge the cannulas 143 toward the distal ends 76 of the guide wires 70, 72, 78, into the dilated tissue.
According to one alternative method, the dilators 80, 82, 88 are removed to permit placement of the cannulas 143, and are not re-inserted. According to other alternative embodiments, cannulas (not shown) may be modular, or may have dilatable distal ends that enable placement of the cannulas around the dilators 80, 82, 88, so that the dilators 80, 82, 88 need not be removed from the guide wires 70, 72, 78 until the cannulas are properly positioned. The present invention is not limited to use of cannulas like those of
Referring to
The connection elements may be fixation members designed to anchor a rod to the first vertebra 24, the second vertebra 26, and the third vertebra (not shown in
The pedicle screws 140, 142, 148 may be designed to provide poly-axial coupling to the associated pedicles. Each of the pedicle screws 140, 142, 148 has a cage 152 shaped to receive a rod and a screw 154 that passes through an aperture (not visible) of the cage 152 in such a manner that the screw 154 is able to extend from the cage 152 along a plurality of relative orientations. Thus, after the screw 154 has been implanted in a pedicle, the orientation of the cage 152 with respect to the screw 154 can still be altered. Each of the screws 154 has a lumen passing along the axis of the screw 154 so that the screws 154 can slide along the guide wires 70, 72, 78 for accurate implantation in the pedicles.
As seen in
The pedicle screws 140, 142, 148 represent only one of many types of connection elements that may be used in connection with the present invention. A variety of known devices may be used to secure a rod to a plurality of vertebra to provide posterior fusion.
Upon implantation in the pedicles, the pedicle screws 140, 142, 148 are positioned such that a first anatomic point 164, a second anatomic point 166, and a third anatomic point 168 are within the troughs 158 of the cages 152 of the first pedicle screw 140, the second pedicle screw 142, and the third pedicle screw 148, respectively. Upon installation of the rod in the troughs, the axis of the rod is to pass through the anatomic points 164, 166, 168.
Referring back to
Prior to the installation of the connecting element 140 shown in
The retractor blades are detachably attached to the first portion of the bone anchor as shown in
Each of the distal tabs 202 is insertable through the slot 174 of the adjacent arm 172 of the cage 152 when the corresponding blade 195 or 197 is tilted to position the proximal end inward relative to the distal end. Once the distal tabs 202 have passed through the slots 174, rotation of the blades 195 or 197 back to a position generally parallel to each other, and to the axis of the cage 152, causes the distal tabs 202 to engage the edge of the slots 174 such that the bends 208 in the tab 202 are unable to slide back through the slots 174. Thus, the blades 195 and 197 are then in a locked configuration, and cannot be detached from the cage 152. When they are again moved to the unlocked configuration, i.e., tilted to a position with the proximal ends 191 inward, the retractor blades can be unlocked and detached.
As long as the blades 195, 197 remain generally parallel to each other, the distal end 192 of the cannula 143 remains secured to the cage 152. Thus, the distal tabs 202 form a docking element that removably secures the cannula 143 to the connecting element 140. The abutment member 145 serves to keep the blades 195, 197 parallel to each other to keep the cannula 143 in assembled form and to simultaneously keep the cannula 143 secured to the cage 152 by keeping the blades 195, 197 from rotating into the unlocked configuration. When the cannula 143 is secured to the cage 152, the cannula 143 is in its “docked configuration.” When the cannula 143 is removed from the cage 152, the cannula 143 is in its “undocked configuration.”
As shown, the abutment member 145 is generally disc-shaped with a central opening and an open side that provides access to the central opening. The abutment member 145 also has a pair of arcuate slots that extend around opposing portions of the central opening and are sized to surround the first and second blades 195, 197 and keep the blades generally parallel to each other, and perpendicular to the abutment member 145. Thus, the blades 195, 197 are unable to pivot to the unlocked configuration when the abutment member 145 is installed to create an assembly and the cannula 143 maintains a generally tubular shape.
After the blades 195, 197 have been inserted into the arcuate slots, the abutment member 145 may be positioned at any of a range of positions along the cannula 143. Thus, upon implantation of the pedicle screw 140 in the corresponding pedicle, the abutment member 145 can be positioned abutting the outward-facing surface of the patient's skin through which the cannula 143 passes. The abutment member 144 helps to stabilize the cannula 143 with respect to the tissues it passes through.
Once assembled to the pedicle screw 140, the cannula 143 has slots 220 extending along its entire longitudinal length, along opposite sides of the cannula 143. The slots 220 extend to the cage 152, and are therefore contiguous with the recesses defined in the arms 172 of the cage 152. Upon installation of the cannula and pedicle screw assembly by using the cannula 100 and tool 170 as shown in
The pedicle screws 140, 142, 148, with or without the assembled cannulas 143, may be installed in a variety of ways. According to one method, the dilators 80, 82, 88 are first removed. Then, each of the pedicle screws 140, 142, 148 is implanted through the use of an insertion tool 170. The insertion tool 170 has a handle 172 designed to be gripped by a hand, a distal end extending from the handle 172 and engaging the head of each of the screws 154. Thus, torque applied to the handle can be transmitted to each of the screws 154.
The stem 174 also has a lumen (not shown) sized to fit around each of the guide wires 70, 72, 78 so that the guide wires 70, 72, 78 can be used to guide implantation of the screws 154 through the use of the insertion tool 170. Slots 178 provide access to the lumen for cleaning.
Each of the screws 140, 142, 148 is coupled to the insertion tool 170 by connecting the head 154 of the screws to the distal end 176 of the stem 174. The insertion tool 170 is then moved to insert the proximal end 74 of the corresponding guide wire 70, 72, 78 through the lumen of the screw 154 and into the lumen of the stem 174. The insertion tool 170 is used to insert the pedicle screw 140, 142, or 148 through the corresponding cannula 100, 102, or 108 until the screw 154 contacts the first pedicle 30, the second pedicle 50, or the third pedicle. Then, torque and axial pressure are applied to the tool 170 to embed the threads of the screw 154 into the bone. The same method may be used to implant all three of the pedicle screws 140, 142, 148. After the pedicle screws 140, 142, 148 have been implanted, the guide wires 70, 72, 78 may be removed.
As previously discussed, the fixation member in the form of a rod for connecting the pedicle screws 140, 142, 148 must be configured in three dimensional space to match the geometrical targets 164, 166, 168, in order to allow the pedicle screws to constrain the vertebrae in the desired positions once they are fastened to the rods. This requires that the rod be contoured. For better precision in contouring the fixation member, simulation members, such as the trough simulation members 180 with base 182, stem 184 and troughs 188 as shown in
As shown in
Referring to
Each of the first and second bridges 250, 252 has a first slider 254 and a second slider 256. The first slider 254 of each of the bridges 250, 252 has a pair of grooves 258 that face inward. The second slider 256 of each of the bridges 250, 252 has a pair of flanges that extend outward into the grooves 258 of the corresponding first slider 254 so that the first and second sliders 254, 256 are linearly slidable relative to each other to permit lengthening or shortening of the bridges 250, 252. Each of the sliders 254, 256 also has an aperture 262 that fits around the stem 184 of the corresponding trough simulation members 180. The apertures 262 are sized to fit around the stems 184 with relatively little clearance so that the bridges 250, 252 keep the trough simulation members 180 and thus the attached cannulas 143 and cages 152 parallel to each other without restricting relative axial rotation between the stems 184 and the apertures 162.
The bridges 250, 252 embody only one of many possible configurations that may be used in connection with the invention. According to one alternative embodiment (not shown), each bridge does not have two sliders, but has two members that are rotatably coupled to each other. Each of the members has an aperture like the apertures 262 of the bridges 250, 252, so that the bridges can permit relatively free relative translation and axial rotation of the trough simulation members 180, while keeping the trough simulation members 180 parallel to each other. The bridges would simply elongate and contract through the use of rotary motion instead of linear motion.
Returning to the configuration of
Referring to
Due to natural variations in spinal morphology, the troughs 158 of the pedicle screws 140, 142, 148 may not be arranged in a straight line. Thus, the simulation troughs 180 may not be arranged in a straight line. Consequently, the rod 270 may need to be bent into the proper shape, for example, through the use of tooling such as pliers, French benders, a vice, or the like, so that it will lie properly within simulation trough 180. The process of deforming the rod 270 to the required shape may be termed “contouring.”
Contouring may be carried out by, first, placing the undeformed rod 270 in the troughs 180 to determine how the rod 270 should be deformed to lie properly within the troughs 180. Then, the rod 270 is deformed, and again placed in the troughs 180 to check the fit. This process is repeated until the rod 270 is shaped to provide an optimal fit with the troughs 180.
In the alternative to contouring, the rod 270 may simply be selected from a kit or the like. For example, such a kit (not shown) may include rods bent at a variety of angles. The troughs 180 could be used to select the proper rod from the kit by placing each rod, in turn, on the troughs 180 until one is identified that has the proper fit. As another alternative, the rod 270 may be custom fabricated, for example, by measuring the relative positions of the troughs 180 and using a CNC procedure to form the rod 270.
After the rod 270 has been configured or selected, the rod 270 and the trough simulation members 180 may be removed from the operating site as shown in
As shown in
The pedicle screws 140, 142, 148 thus cooperate with the rod 270 to restrict relative motion of the vertebrae to form a posterior vertebral fusion system. If desired, a similar system may be implanted in the left-side pedicles through the method set forth previously to provide a bilateral system. Additionally, the present invention is not limited to a three-level fusion system, but may be used to fuse any number of vertebrae together. To fuse more than three vertebrae together, the steps set forth above may simply be repeated for each additional vertebra, and the rod may be placed on four or more rod interfaces for configuration or selection.
The foregoing is only one of many methods encompassed within the scope of the present invention. According to one alternative method, the trough simulation members 180 may be omitted entirely from the procedure. Such a method may commence with the steps outlined above in the descriptions of
Referring to
A typical surgical procedure in accordance with the present invention will now be described. It will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that additional or fewer steps may be performed, the sequence of steps can be varied as appropriate and that substitute techniques and methods may be utilized. Nonetheless, during a typical surgery, a surgeon may perform the following steps: percutaneously installing guide wires in bones, such as adjacent vertebrae, as shown in
using blunt dilators and cannulas to open incisions and cavities as shown in
percutaneously installing polyaxial screws with retractor blades attached as shown in
removing the cannulas and guide wires as shown in
installing the abutment members to form slotted cannula assemblies,
installing the trough simulation members or rods to the cannula assembly and/or the polyaxial screw head to form contouring assemblies as shown in
aligning the contouring assemblies in a parallel relationship and installing the links onto the assemblies as shown in
contouring the fixation member to fit the trough simulation members as shown in
installing the contoured fixation member percutaneously as shown in
fastening the fixation member in the polyaxial screws as shown in
removing the elongate members As Shown In
The foregoing description discloses a number of different elements, any of which may be components of a system for configuring or selecting one or more implants for implantation in a body of a patient. Although the foregoing examples relate to the assembly and implantation of a posterior spinal fusion system, the present invention may be applied to a wide variety of implants, within and outside the orthopedic area. The present invention has particular benefits when an implant is to be configured or selected for a given patient, with reference to two or more anatomic points within the body.
Although the invention herein has been described with reference to particular embodiments, it is to be understood that these embodiments are merely illustrative of the principles and applications of the present invention. It is therefore to be understood that numerous modifications may be made to the illustrative embodiments and that other arrangements may be devised without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3788318 | Kim et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
3789852 | Kim et al. | Feb 1974 | A |
3892232 | Neufeld | Jul 1975 | A |
4083370 | Taylor | Apr 1978 | A |
4350151 | Scott | Sep 1982 | A |
4409968 | Drummond | Oct 1983 | A |
4411259 | Drummond | Oct 1983 | A |
4448191 | Rodnyansky et al. | May 1984 | A |
4449532 | Storz et al. | May 1984 | A |
4474046 | Cook | Oct 1984 | A |
4545374 | Jacobson | Oct 1985 | A |
4611581 | Steffee | Sep 1986 | A |
4653481 | Howland et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4790297 | Luque | Dec 1988 | A |
4817587 | Janese | Apr 1989 | A |
4862891 | Smith | Sep 1989 | A |
4887595 | Heinig et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4899729 | Gill et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4913134 | Luque | Apr 1990 | A |
4957495 | Kluger | Sep 1990 | A |
5010879 | Moriya et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5027793 | Engelhardt et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5125396 | Ray | Jun 1992 | A |
5171279 | Mathews | Dec 1992 | A |
5183464 | Dubrul et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5195541 | Obenchain | Mar 1993 | A |
5242443 | Kambin | Sep 1993 | A |
5295994 | Bonutti | Mar 1994 | A |
D346217 | Sparker et al. | Apr 1994 | S |
5357983 | Mathews | Oct 1994 | A |
5360431 | Puno et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5373860 | Catone | Dec 1994 | A |
5395317 | Kambin | Mar 1995 | A |
5409488 | Ulrich | Apr 1995 | A |
5425732 | Ulrich | Jun 1995 | A |
5439464 | Shapiro | Aug 1995 | A |
5480440 | Kambin | Jan 1996 | A |
5490409 | Weber | Feb 1996 | A |
5496322 | Mathews | Mar 1996 | A |
5545228 | Kambin | Aug 1996 | A |
5569248 | Mathews | Oct 1996 | A |
5569290 | McAfee | Oct 1996 | A |
5584887 | Kambin | Dec 1996 | A |
5591165 | Jackson | Jan 1997 | A |
5601590 | Bonutti et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5624442 | Mellinger et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5658286 | Sava | Aug 1997 | A |
5720751 | Jackson | Feb 1998 | A |
5728097 | Mathews | Mar 1998 | A |
5741261 | Moskovitz et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5746720 | Stouder, Jr. | May 1998 | A |
5762629 | Kambin | Jun 1998 | A |
5792044 | Foley et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5814046 | Hopf et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5882344 | Stouder, Jr. | Mar 1999 | A |
5885291 | Moskovitz et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5885292 | Moskovitz et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5891147 | Moskovitz et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5902231 | Foley et al. | May 1999 | A |
RE36221 | Breard et al. | Jun 1999 | E |
5928139 | Koros et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5938662 | Rinner | Aug 1999 | A |
5944658 | Koros et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5954635 | Foley et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5957888 | Hinchliffe | Sep 1999 | A |
5961499 | Bonutti et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5964761 | Kambin | Oct 1999 | A |
5976146 | Ogawa et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6007487 | Foley et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6015409 | Jackson | Jan 2000 | A |
6033406 | Mathews | Mar 2000 | A |
6035691 | Lin et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6090113 | Le Couedic et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6123707 | Wagner | Sep 2000 | A |
6127597 | Beyar et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6152871 | Foley et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6159179 | Simonson | Dec 2000 | A |
6162170 | Foley et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6175758 | Kambin | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183472 | Lutz | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6187000 | Davison et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6197002 | Peterson | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6200322 | Branch et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206822 | Foley et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206826 | Mathews et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6217509 | Foley et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226548 | Foley et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6235028 | Brumfield et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6287313 | Sasso | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6332780 | Traxel et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6371968 | Kogasaka et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6425859 | Foley et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6485518 | Cornwall et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6506151 | Estes et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6520907 | Foley et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6524320 | DiPoto | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6530926 | Davison | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6530929 | Justis et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6562046 | Sasso | May 2003 | B2 |
6575979 | Cragg | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6596008 | Kambin | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6605095 | Grossman | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6607530 | Carl et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6723095 | Hammerslag | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6740089 | Haider | May 2004 | B2 |
6749614 | Teitelbaum et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6770074 | Michelson | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6793656 | Mathews | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6800084 | Davison et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6811558 | Davison et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6821277 | Teitelbaum | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6837891 | Davison et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6849064 | Hamada | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6875212 | Shaolian et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6899713 | Shaolian et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6923811 | Carl et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6929647 | Cohen | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6964667 | Shaolian et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7008422 | Foley et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7008424 | Teitelbaum | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7011660 | Sherman et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7083621 | Shaolian et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7160300 | Jackson | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7188626 | Foley et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7250052 | Landry et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7306603 | Boehm, Jr. et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7758617 | Iott et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7811288 | Jones et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7927360 | Pond, Jr. et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7955355 | Chin | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8002798 | Chin et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8177817 | Fallin | May 2012 | B2 |
8192440 | Jones et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
20010011170 | Davison et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010027320 | Sasso | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010029353 | Peterson | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010049498 | Davison et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010049527 | Cragg | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010053915 | Grossman | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020016583 | Cragg | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020045904 | Fuss et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020068975 | Teitelbaum et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082598 | Teitelbaum | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082600 | Shaolian et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020107519 | Dixon et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116006 | Cohen | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020161367 | Ferree | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161368 | Foley et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020173796 | Cragg | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020198526 | Shaolian et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030060824 | Viart et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060826 | Foley et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030073998 | Pagliuca et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030083688 | Simonson | May 2003 | A1 |
20030139648 | Foley et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030195518 | Cragg | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030199872 | Markworth et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030199884 | Davison et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204189 | Cragg | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030208202 | Falahee | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030225408 | Nichols et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030229353 | Cragg | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040006341 | Shaolian et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040006344 | Nguyen et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040034351 | Sherman et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039384 | Boehm et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040059333 | Carl et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040082954 | Teitelbaum et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040082960 | Davison | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040082961 | Teitelbaum | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040087950 | Teitelbaum | May 2004 | A1 |
20040092934 | Howland | May 2004 | A1 |
20040093001 | Hamada | May 2004 | A1 |
20040106934 | Grossman | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040133201 | Shluzas et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138662 | Landry et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143265 | Landry et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143268 | Falahee | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040147928 | Landry et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040147936 | Rosenberg et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040172022 | Landry et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040176763 | Foley et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040194791 | Sterman et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215190 | Nguyen et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215193 | Shaolian et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040236317 | Davison | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040254576 | Dunbar et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260287 | Ferree | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267279 | Casutt et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050010220 | Casutt et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050010221 | Dalton | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021030 | Pagliuca et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021031 | Foley et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050033297 | Davison | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050038432 | Shaolian et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050038434 | Mathews | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043741 | Michelson | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043742 | Bruneau et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050059969 | McKinley | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065515 | Jahng | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065517 | Chin | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050070917 | Justis | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050080418 | Simonson et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085813 | Spitler et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050090822 | DiPoto | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050090833 | DiPoto | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050113833 | Davison | May 2005 | A1 |
20050124991 | Jahng | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050131407 | Sicvol et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050131408 | Sicvol et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050131421 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050131422 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137461 | Marchek et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137593 | Gray et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149022 | Shaolian et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050149035 | Pimenta et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050154389 | Selover et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050171540 | Lim et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050182410 | Jackson | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192570 | Jackson | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050245928 | Colleran et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050251139 | Roh | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050277934 | Vardiman | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050277942 | Kullas et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060030839 | Park et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060030858 | Simonson et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060030861 | Simonson et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060111713 | Jackson | May 2006 | A1 |
20060111714 | Foley | May 2006 | A1 |
20060200135 | Sherman et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060217735 | MacDonald et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060247658 | Pond et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060264934 | Fallin | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060264962 | Chin et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060293680 | Jackson | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070043359 | Altarac et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070083210 | Hestad et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070093824 | Hestad et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080009864 | Forton et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20090216328 | Birkmeyer et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090228056 | Jackson | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100137915 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100331901 | Iott et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110015678 | Jackson | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110077692 | Jackson | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110152940 | Frigg et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110238120 | Chin | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110245884 | Brumfield et al. | Oct 2011 | A9 |
20120089191 | Altarac et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120123477 | Landry et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120158070 | Jackson | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120197302 | Fallin | Aug 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
37 11 091 | Oct 1988 | DE |
4238339 | May 1994 | DE |
29710979 | Jun 1997 | DE |
19726754 | Feb 1999 | DE |
10027988 | Jan 2002 | DE |
528177 | Feb 1993 | EP |
611116 | Aug 1994 | EP |
665731 | Aug 1995 | EP |
1006888 | Jun 2000 | EP |
1374786 | Jan 2004 | EP |
1468652 | Oct 2004 | EP |
1545355 | Jun 2005 | EP |
839513 | Jun 1981 | SU |
9318722 | Sep 1993 | WO |
9409726 | May 1994 | WO |
9514437 | Jun 1995 | WO |
9714457 | Apr 1997 | WO |
9822030 | May 1998 | WO |
9836785 | Aug 1998 | WO |
0045720 | Aug 2000 | WO |
0112080 | Feb 2001 | WO |
0137744 | May 2001 | WO |
0141681 | Jun 2001 | WO |
0160234 | Aug 2001 | WO |
0160263 | Aug 2001 | WO |
0160270 | Aug 2001 | WO |
0195823 | Dec 2001 | WO |
03020110 | Mar 2003 | WO |
03028566 | Apr 2003 | WO |
03037170 | May 2003 | WO |
03057055 | Jul 2003 | WO |
03079914 | Oct 2003 | WO |
03088810 | Oct 2003 | WO |
03088878 | Oct 2003 | WO |
2004004584 | Jan 2004 | WO |
2004017847 | Mar 2004 | WO |
2004021899 | Mar 2004 | WO |
2004028382 | Apr 2004 | WO |
2004037070 | May 2004 | WO |
2004037074 | May 2004 | WO |
2004041100 | May 2004 | WO |
2004058045 | Jul 2004 | WO |
2004080318 | Sep 2004 | WO |
2005018466 | Mar 2005 | WO |
2005023123 | Mar 2005 | WO |
2005032358 | Apr 2005 | WO |
2005060534 | Jul 2005 | WO |
2005060534 | Jul 2005 | WO |
2005072081 | Aug 2005 | WO |
2006125029 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2006116662 | Nov 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Synthes; MIRA for M.LS.S, Surgical Technique Brochure. Synthes, p. 1-7. |
Spinal Concepts; Access Dilation Port, Spinal Concepts Web Page information 2 pages. |
Sofamor Danek; Sextant CD Horizon Sextant Rod Insertion System. Surgical Techniqu Techniques p. 1-29. |
Sofamor Danek; Metrx, X-Tube, Refraction System; Sofamor Danek Web page information p. 1-2. |
Sofamor Danek; Eclipse CD Horizon Eclipse Implants and Instruments, Information from the Sofamor Danek Web page, p. 1-3. |
Smith and Nephew; 6.5mm and 4.0mm Cannulated Screws, Surgical Technique p. 1-24. |
Pathfinder; Minimally invasive Spinal Fixation System and Surgical Technique. Spinal Concepts Product Brochure, p. 1-26. |
Pathfinder; Minimally Invasive Pedicle Fixation System. Spinal Concepts Product Brochure p. 1-4. |
Maxcess; Decompression Surgical Technique. Nuvasive Creative Spine Technology Product Brochure, p. 1-16. |
Charles Hartjen; The Atavi System, Surgical Technique Brochure. Endius, p. 1-17. |
Diapason, Surgical Texchnique Catalog, Diapasan Spinal System, Jan. 2002. |
Maxcess; XLIF 90° Surgical Technique. Nuvasive Creative Spine Technology Product Brochure, p. 1-26. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/178,035, mailed Mar. 9, 2009. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/178,035, mailed Sep. 5, 2008. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/178,035, mailed May 1, 2008. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/868,075, mailed Mar. 4, 2009. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/868,075, mailed Mar. 24, 2008. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/868,075, mailed Oct. 12, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/202,487, filed Aug. 12, 2005. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/868,075, filed Jun. 15, 2004. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/178,035, filed Jul. 8, 2005. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/178,035, mailed Nov. 13, 2009. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/202,487, mailed Aug. 5, 2009. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/316,637, mailed Oct. 17, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/904,029. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/904,030. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/202,487, mailed Dec. 9, 2008. |
Leu et al., Percutaneous Fusion of the Lumbar Spine, State of the Art Reviews, vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 593-604, Sep. 1992. |
Kambin, Arthroscopic Lumbar Intervertebral Fusion, Chapter 95, The Adult Spine, vol. 2, pp. 2037-2046, 1997. |
Kambin et al., Anterior Column Support for Failed Fusion, Revision Spine Surgery, pp. 589-600, date not known. |
Kambin, The Role of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Spinal Disorders, Advance Operative Orthopedics, vol. 3, pp. 147-171, 1995. |
Kambin, “Arthroscopic Microdiscectomy”, The Journal of Arthroscopy, vol. 8, No. 3, 1992, pp. 287-295. |
Kambin et al, “Percutaneous Posterolateral Lumbar Discectomy and Decompression with a 6.9-millimeter cannula”, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Jul. 1991, pp. 822-831. |
Kambin, “Arthroscopic Microdiskectomy”, The Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine, vol. 58, No. 2, Mar. 1991, pp. 159-164. |
Kambin, “Posterolateral Percutaneous suction-excision of herniated lumbar intervertebral discs”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. No. 207, Jun. 1988, pp. 37-42. |
Kambin, Posterolateral Percutaneous Lumbar Interbody Fusion, Arthroscopic Microdiscectomy, pp. 117-121, 1991. |
Kambin, Posterolateral Percutaneous Lumbar Discectomy and Decompression Arthroscopic Microdiscectomy, Section IV. pp. 67-100, 1991. |
Kambin, Minimally Invasive Techniques in Spinal Surgery Current Practice, Neurosurgical Focus, wwwspineuniversecom, 16 pages, printed Aug. 24, 2005. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070233079 A1 | Oct 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60765606 | Feb 2006 | US |