This application is a §371 National Stage Application of PCT International Application No. PCT/EP2011/057263 filed May 6, 2011 claiming priority of Norweigian Application No. 2010 0670, filed May 10, 2010.
The present invention relates to a rod-shaped tool holder used in machine tools, in particular for chip-removing machining, and in this connection especially large overhang internal turning. In this context, the term overhang typically refers to the distance between the attachment point of the tool holder and the location of the cutting bit. Large overhangs are necessary in internal machining in deep work pieces, for example. The invention may also be used in connection with other forms of machining in which a rod-shaped tool holder is used, and may be used for tool holders holding several cutting bits. In such machining, oscillations are generated in the rod, which is a problem since the oscillations cause the cutting bit to move relative to the work piece to be machined. This reduces the dimensional tolerances and achievable surface finish, and may even result in noise and failure. Typical applications for such machining are within the car industry, airplane industry, energy sector, and for oil and gas recovery equipment.
In order to reduce such vibrations it is common to use dampers in the rod, and through the use of such dampers, the overhang length can be increased, typically in the order of up to 12×D, where D is the rod diameter.
For particularly large overhangs, higher order bending oscillations in the rod become more dominating, and such oscillations are difficult to damp. In this context, higher order bending oscillations means that the rod-shaped tool holder oscillates about a centre line and crosses this line at several points in each oscillatory cycle. These points are referred to as nodes. These vibrations cause a displacement, uω(x, t), of the tool holder which depends on the position along the x axis, time, and oscillation mode, and which affect the position of the cutting bit. In practice, this limits the maximum usable overhang length.
By positioning the cutting bit as suggested according to the present invention the overhang length can be increased significantly with no reduction of the dimensional tolerances or surface quality achievable by machining.
A damper may be provided in front of the cutting bit, and can be inserted in a thin-walled cross-section. The cutting bit may be placed at or nearby a node of the second resonance frequency. In this context, the node of the second resonance frequency refers to the first node following the attachment point at which the tool holder axis oscillates about a rectilinear centre axis through the tool holder. This is the point at which uω2(x, t) is at its minimum. This has given good results for large overhangs. The damper will act on the first resonance frequency and partly higher order oscillation modes. The point at which to attach the cutting bit can be calculated analytically, through a finite element analysis, or be measured using modal analysis. Modal analysis measurements may be carried out subsequently in order to place the node exactly at the attachment point of the cutting bit.
Hence, the present invention defines a rod-shaped tool holder having a length l for the attachment of at least one machining cutting bit. The tool holder is configured for having a main attachment point at a first end, and optionally a secondary support against the work piece being machined, and has a second, free end. In operation, the tool holder oscillates in higher order flexural modes about at least one node located on a rectilinear axis (x) running from the first end thereof. The at least one cutting bit is positioned substantially at the node in a distance from the free end, towards the first end.
The distance between the first end of the tool holder and the at least one cutting bit may be in the order of 0.78 l-0.91 l. This distance is typical for homogenous rods. However, a tool may be comprised of various materials and excavations, and many factors may influence the actual value. In other words, the actual values may differ from the above values.
An oscillation damper may be provided between the free end of the holder and the at least one cutting bit.
A secondary support may be provided between the at least one cutting bit and the main attachment point.
The at least one cutting bit may be positioned in the node of second order oscillations.
The at least one cutting bit may be positioned in the node(s) of third order oscillations.
The at least one cutting bit may be positioned in the node(s) of fourth order oscillations.
The tool holder may have a diameter D, and the at least one cutting bit may be positioned in a distance of at least 10×D from the first end, or the secondary support.
The tool holder may further comprise a secondary support between the at least one cutting bit and the first end. The at least one cutting bit may be positioned in a distance of at least 10×D from the secondary support.
The tool holder may further allow for one or more cutting bits to be disposed at each node. Such bits can be positioned in different positions around the circumference of the tool at the nodes.
The tool holder may be operated in higher order oscillation modes, so that at least two nodes are formed. Cutting bits may be positioned at or nearby at least two of these nodes. For example, if there are three nodes, cutting bits may be positioned at one, two, or possibly all three of these nodes. Normally, cutting bits will be positioned at the node closest to the free end of the tool holder in order to allow for machining to be performed with the largest overhang possible. Also, two, three or more cutting bits may be positioned at each node. For example, when having three nodes and three cutting bits at each node, there are a total of nine cutting bits. It is not necessary, however, to have the same number of cutting bits at each node.
In
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20100670 | May 2010 | NO | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2011/057263 | 5/6/2011 | WO | 00 | 11/8/2012 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2011/141360 | 12/17/2011 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3739665 | Kumabe et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
4620121 | Mishiro | Oct 1986 | A |
4911044 | Mishiro et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
5170103 | Rouch et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5218893 | Shikata | Jun 1993 | A |
6694213 | Claesson et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
7647853 | Lundblad | Jan 2010 | B2 |
20060291973 | Claesson et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070101839 | Travez | May 2007 | A1 |
20070180961 | Imai | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20100172708 | Bolin et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
200025964 | May 2000 | WO |
2005042195 | May 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130058733 A1 | Mar 2013 | US |