This invention relates generally to fabric awnings and more particularly to staple-in metal frames and frame components for such awnings.
So-called staple-in awning frames, across which canvas or other cloth material is stretched to form an awning, have become popular in recent years. In general, a staple-in awning frame is fabricated with metal ribs that form the skeleton of the awning. At least some of the ribs, which generally are square or rectangular in shape, have a slot along their outside edges and a staple deck recessed within the slot. When a cloth material is stretched over the frame, it is tucked into the slots of the frame ribs and staples are driven through the cloth and through the staple deck to secure the material to the ribs. Once the cloth material is attached in this way, lengths of plastic or rubberized filler strips are snapped into the slots to hide the staples, cover the slots, and form an aesthetically pleasing appearance. This method of fabricating cloth awnings has proven superior to old tie-on and other methods.
In the past, awning frame members for staple-in awnings generally have been extruded from aluminum with the body, slot, and staple deck of the frame member being extruded as a unitary piece of extruded aluminum. While such extrusions have been successful, aluminum extrusion generally is an expensive and maintenance intensive manufacturing process. Furthermore, the softness of aluminum can lead to deformation and even collapse of the frame members in some cases, particularly where they are bent into an arc for use in rounded awning designs. Finally, the welding of aluminum requires special helium arc welding equipment and special skill, which is undesirable for some awning manufacturers. Thus, a need exists for an improved staple-in awning frame member that is less expensive to manufacture, less prone to collapse and deformation when bent, easier to weld and otherwise work with when building an awning frame, and generally improved over prior art extruded aluminum frame members. It is to the provision of such an awning frame member and to a methodology for its fabrication using roll forming techniques that the present invention is primarily directed.
Briefly described, the present invention is an improved staple-in awning frame member formed from two roll formed strips of metal. One of the strips of metal forms the generally square or rectangular body of the frame member with a slot along one side and the other forms a staple deck member that is nested and secured within the body member recessed within the slot to form the staple deck of the frame member. Preferably, the body and staple deck member are each formed of galvanized steel, although other metals such as aluminum, copper, or the like may be used for either or both. A method of roll form fabrication of the awning frame member also is disclosed and is part of the invention. During fabrication, strips of metal that will become the body and staple deck member are progressively roll formed, preferably along parallel paths, into generally U-shaped or C-shaped configurations as they advance through a roll forming machine. When the strips are almost fully formed, but still somewhat splayed, the strip that will become the staple deck member is progressively moved into the slot of the body. The combined body and staple deck member are then progressively bent inwardly to form the generally square shape of the frame member and the staple deck member is securely fastened to the body. The staple deck may be secured to the body with spot welds, through punches, or other means but, in the illustrated and preferred embodiment, is secured by having an inner flange of the body along the edges of the slot bent over the upper edge portions of the staple deck. With the assembly thus formed, a final step includes impacting the sides of the frame member with substantial force to urge it into its final square shape. The resulting awning frame member resembles in some respects prior art extruded aluminum frame members and is used in a similar way to build awning frames. However, since it is formed in a continuous roll forming process rather than an aluminum extrusion process, it is substantially less expensive and less troublesome to manufacture. The resulting frame member preferably is made of steel rather than aluminum, and therefore is easier to weld and otherwise bend and work with than aluminum frame members. In addition, steel awning frame members have been demonstrated to be less susceptible to collapse when bent into an arc and generally form awning frames that are stronger and more rigid than aluminum frames. These and other features, objects, and advantages of the frame member and fabrication process of this invention will become more apparent upon review of the detailed description of the invention set forth below when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing figures, which are briefly described as follows.
The preferred embodiment of the inventions disclosed herein will now be described with reference to the attached drawing figures. Since roll forming in general and the various roll forming stations illustrated in these drawings generally are self explanatory to one of skill in the art of roll forming, excessive description of roll forming techniques is not necessary and will not be provided here. Instead, reference to the drawings will be made primarily to illustrate the various steps of the method of this invention for roll forming the awning frame member of the invention.
Similarly,
With the body and staple deck roll formed into the shapes shown in
With the partially formed staple deck inserted in the partially formed body, the assembly is moved through a positioning station 41, which is illustrated in
With the staple deck properly positioned within the body as shown in
Upon leaving the crimping station, the frame member assembly still is slightly splayed or open and not yet completely formed into its final square shape. To square the frame member, it first passes through a set of squaring rollers, such as those illustrated in
After passing the squaring rollers, the frame member is substantially completely formed. However, in order to assure a consistently sized and accurately square shape, the member preferably is passed through a moving pneumatic shaper (not shown). The pneumatic shaper has internal anvils of the proper shape and size of the desired frame member and elongated hammers that can be driven pneumatically with substantial force against the sides of the frame member and the anvils. The pneumatic shaper preferably is several inches long so that force is applied to the frame member along a substantial length thereof when the hammers are activated. This helps to insure that the metal of the frame member retains its final shape and does not bend or splay back out as a result of the natural memory of the metal. To accomplish this, the pneumatic shaper preferably is mounted on rails and, when activated, rides along with the moving frame member as it exits the roll forming machine to maintain pressure and shaping force on the frame member for a period of time. At the end of this period of time, the hammers are released and the pneumatic shaper is moved by a pneumatic cylinder back to its home position, where it is again activated to shape the next successive section of frame member. In this way, the entire length of the frame member is shaped in successive slightly overlapping sections.
When the frame member leaves the pneumatic shaper, the roll forming process is complete and the frame member takes on its final cross-sectional shape as illustrated in
The inventions have been described herein in terms of preferred embodiments and methodologies that represent the best mode known to the inventors for carrying out the invention. A variety of modifications to the illustrated embodiments might be made by those of skill in the art, however, within the scope of the invention. For instance, rather than securing the staple deck within the body by a crimping process, it might be secured in other ways such as, for example, by spot welding the two pieces together at the end of the roll forming line, or by crimping or punching through the two pieces. In such event, the shapes of the body and staple deck might be different from the specific shapes shown in the attached drawings and photographs to accommodate the particular securing technique used. The metal from which the staple deck and body are formed may be any appropriate metal other than galvanized steel and/or aluminum depending upon application specific requirements. These and other additions, deletions, and modifications might well be implemented, and all are considered to be within the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the claims.
Priority is hereby claimed to the filing date of U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/326,914 filed on Oct. 3, 2001, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2287667 | Brown | Jun 1942 | A |
2834412 | Velke | May 1958 | A |
3357681 | Souza, Jr. | Dec 1967 | A |
3508369 | Tennison | Apr 1970 | A |
D218295 | MacLellan et al. | Aug 1970 | S |
3559357 | Lowe | Feb 1971 | A |
3834104 | Dunn et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
4189880 | Ballin | Feb 1980 | A |
4193235 | Cucchiara | Mar 1980 | A |
4231141 | Derrick et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4233790 | Meadows | Nov 1980 | A |
4272073 | Grosser et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4690192 | Stilling | Sep 1987 | A |
4718213 | Butterfield | Jan 1988 | A |
4726869 | Matsui et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4759087 | Zeilinger | Jul 1988 | A |
4817655 | Brooks | Apr 1989 | A |
4845916 | Villard | Jul 1989 | A |
4926605 | Milliken et al. | May 1990 | A |
D309351 | Patsy, Jr. | Jul 1990 | S |
5044131 | Fisher | Sep 1991 | A |
5172743 | Wallace et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5209029 | Foerst | May 1993 | A |
5224306 | Cramer | Jul 1993 | A |
5237785 | Lukes | Aug 1993 | A |
5242004 | Stilling | Sep 1993 | A |
5259323 | Koch et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5291705 | Dickerson | Mar 1994 | A |
5469672 | Fisher | Nov 1995 | A |
5514432 | Lisec | May 1996 | A |
5555695 | Patsy, Jr. | Sep 1996 | A |
5577352 | Fisher | Nov 1996 | A |
5713108 | Solomon et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5791115 | Nicolai et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5794400 | Fisher et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5906078 | Cramer | May 1999 | A |
6321397 | Fogg et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030061782 A1 | Apr 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60326914 | Oct 2001 | US |