The present invention relates to a roll forming apparatus with in-line sweeping unit for bending roll formed structural beam components into non-linear non-planar shapes.
Roll forming apparatus exist that are capable of forming sheet into swept tubular structural beams. For example, Sturrus U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,092,512 and 5,454,504 and Lyons Published Application U.S. 2007/0180880 illustrate innovations where in-line sweep units at an end of a roll forming apparatus produce swept tubular bumper reinforcement beams. However, the apparatus of Sturrus '512 and '504 and Lyons '880 are limited to a single plane of sweep (also called “single plane of deformation”) and further are limited to sweeping in a single direction from a line level of the roll forming apparatus. Some structural products require sweeps in multiple directions and in different planes, rather than being limited to a single direction from line level or being limited to a single plane of deformation.
Notably, there are many difficulties in forming structural roll formed products in multiple directions. For example, sweeping in multiple directions requires multiple moving components, each adding complexity and tolerance issues as well as a nightmare of durability and maintenance problems. Further, when a structural product is bent in multiple directions, its “flat” wall sections tend to collapse and/or undulate in unpredictable directions, resulting in poor tolerance control and poor dimensional control. This is especially true where the roll formed material is high strength steel and/or where the beams have planar walls. Still further, where high strength steel is being formed, the loads and stress on machine components become very high, resulting in substantial maintenance and the need for constant repair. For example, structural beams and bumper reinforcement beams can be 80 ksi tensile strength steel (or higher), 2.2 mm thick (or thicker), and have a 3″×4″ (or more) cross-sectional envelop size. The forces resulting from attempts to sweep a beam of this makeup are extraordinarily high. The complexity increases still further if the sweep unit is expected to selectively sweep in multiple directions or planes, sweep at various selected times or longitudinal locations, and/or form relatively small radii, particularly where expected to do so “on the fly” at relatively high continuous line speeds of 100+ feet per minute. Notably, the automotive industry in particular has very tight requirements of dimensional consistency for bumper reinforcement beams and structural and frame sections, as well as high impact strength and high bending strength requirements.
In one aspect of the present invention, an apparatus includes a roll former with rolls constructed to form sheet material into a structural beam defining a longitudinal line level and having a first pair of opposing sides and a second pair of opposing sides, and a sweep unit in-line with the roll former. The sweep unit is constructed to selectively sweep the beam away from the longitudinal line level in both vertical and horizontal directions during continuous operation of the roll former. The sweep unit includes a sweep unit frame supporting a pair of first rolls with axes defining a fixed first dimension perpendicular to the line level and with first roller exterior surfaces engaging the first pair of opposing sides. The sweep unit frame further supports a pair of second rolls with axes defining a fixed second dimension perpendicular to the line level and with second roller exterior surfaces engaging the second pair of opposing sides. At least one actuator is operably connected to the sweep unit frame and configured to selectively angularly tilt the sweep unit frame in both horizontal and vertical angles while the first and second fixed dimensions stay constant. The sweep unit frame is movable between a home position where the first and second rolls all lie in the home plane perpendicular to the line level, and is configured to move the sweep unit frame to a first angled plane where the first rolls lie in the home plane but where one of the second rolls lies upstream of the home plane while another of the second rolls lies downstream of the home plane, and is configured to move the sweep unit frame to a second angled plane where the second rolls lie in the home plane but where one of the first rolls lies upstream of the home plane while another of the first rolls lies downstream of the home plane.
In another aspect of the present invention, a method includes providing a roll former with rolls constructed to form sheet material into a structural beam defining a longitudinal line level and having a first pair of opposing sides and a second pair of opposing sides, and providing a sweep unit in-line with the roll former and constructed to selectively sweep the beam away from the longitudinal line level in both vertical and horizontal directions during continuous operation of the roll former, the sweep unit including a sweep unit frame supporting a pair of first rolls with axes defining a fixed first dimension perpendicular to the line level and with first roller exterior surfaces engaging the first pair of opposing sides, the sweep unit frame further supporting including a pair of second rolls with axes defining a fixed second dimension perpendicular to the line level and with second roller exterior surfaces engaging the second pair of opposing sides. The method further includes providing at least one actuator operably connected to the sweep unit frame and configured to selectively angularly tilt the sweep unit frame in one or both horizontal and vertical angles while the first and second fixed dimensions stay constant. The method still further includes moving the sweep unit frame between a home position where the first and second rolls all lie in the home plane perpendicular to the line level, and selectively moving the sweep unit frame to a first angled plane where one of the second rolls lies upstream of the home plane while another of the second rolls lies downstream of the home plane, and selectively moving the sweep unit frame to a second angled plane where one of the first rolls lies upstream of the home plane while another of the first rolls lies downstream of the home plane.
These and other aspects, objects, and features of the present invention will be understood and appreciated by those skilled in the art upon studying the following specification, claims, and appended drawings.
The present apparatus 50 (
For example, the illustrated beam segment 55 (also called a “bumper reinforcement beam” herein since it is useful as a vehicle bumper reinforcement beam) (
As can be seen by comparing
The present apparatus including sweep unit 52 is particularly well suited to prevent undesired deformation, including minimal distortion toward a rhombus shape and also minimal distortion toward undulating wall shapes. Specifically, high strength steels, when compressed, tend to form undulations. By using the present sweep unit, compressive stresses are minimized and tensile forces are maximized, due in significant part to bending the continuous beam around one forming rolls while wrapping an opposing forming roll around a downstream side of the one forming rolls, as discussed below.
An important benefit of the present innovation is that a single set of tooling on the roll former 51 and on sweep unit 52 can be used to manufacture different beams for different vehicles, where the beams have similar cross sectional shapes but different bends. Further, the set up time and/or down time between production runs of the different beams is reduced essentially to zero since the change is limited to a program control change in the programmable controller controlling operation of the sweep unit. This results in substantial cost savings and reduced capital investment. Specifically, the present innovation allows instantaneous or “on the fly” adjustment during high speed operation of a roll former and sweep unit from a first beam having a first relationship of its center section to its end sections, to a second beam having a different second relationship of its center section to its end sections.
Specifically, our testing has shown that a particular beam cross section can often be used for different vehicles, except that the different vehicles often have a different height of their frame rail tips to the ground and a different relationship of the frame rail tips to the bumper beam's preferred center height. Further, bumper beams in different vehicles have a different fore-aft relation to the vehicle's frame rail tips, to the vehicle's wheels, and to other vehicle components. For example, vehicles from a same model style may have a different fascia package (i.e., requiring a differently-shaped reinforcement beam), or may have different options and vehicle accessories (such as different wheel diameters or suspension packages or trailering options) or have different vehicle weights (such as due to added vehicle accessories), all of which may result in the need for a modified bumper system where the height and/or fore-aft position of the beam's center section to beam's end sections are changed. Further, vehicle manufacturing companies often develop a new vehicle by starting with an “old” vehicle, then proceeding to modify its frame, wheels, suspension, fascia, and/or other components.
Traditionally, these new vehicles could not use the old bumper system since bumper mounting locations were different and also different bumper beam strengths were needed. Thus historically, a completely new bumper development program was initiated, where for each new style vehicle, the bumper beam cross section, shape, material, and mounting was developed and optimized through testing. This results in long bumper development programs costing hundreds of thousands of dollars, new tooling, new fixturing, and additional inventory. Using the present innovation, the bumper systems must still be tested and certified, but the basic bumper beam segment can be made using the same rolls and tooling, but with sweeps being adjusted to position the beam segment's center section at an optimal (different) location relative to its end sections for each individual model or vehicle. At the same time, each bumper system can be optimized through material selection, by controlling shapes of the transition sections, and/or through beam-attached beam-section-specific internal/external stiffeners.
As a result, one set of tooling (i.e., one complete set of forming rolls on the roll former and potentially also one set of sweep-forming rolls on the sweep unit) can be used to manufacture two different beams, thus eliminating the need for two different sets of roll form tooling. Further, there is no changeover when switching between runs, nor any lost time due to set up, since the controller is programmed to automatically selectively produce both types of beams.
Notably, the illustrated bumper beam segment 55 (
It is contemplated that the present inventive concepts will work on many different beams, including different closed tubular cross sections (such as O, P, B, D, square, rectangular, hexagon, or the like) and also beams having open cross sections (such as L, X, U, T, I, Z or the like). Also, it is contemplated that the longitudinal curvatures given to the continuous beam by the sweep unit 52 can define a constant radius, or changing radius, and also can be made in any direction or at any longitudinal location along the continuous beam. Also, straight (un-deformed) sections can be left in the beam if desired, as illustrated by
The roll former 51 includes a machine frame 61, and a plurality of axle-supported driven sweep forming rolls 70 for forming a strip of high strength sheet material (such as steel of 40 ksi tensile strength, or more preferably 80 ksi or greater such as up to 120-220 ksi tensile strength) into a cross-sectional shape of the continuous beam 53. The illustrated roll former 51 also includes a welder 49’ for welding the cross-sectional shape into a permanent tubular shape and a guillotine-type cut-off device 49. The illustrated roll former 51 includes rolls configured to form the continuous linear beam 53 (see
List of component names for the sweep unit 52:
The main frame/machine base 61 (
The horizontal axis “elliptical” curvilinear bearing races 65 are located at top and bottom locations on an inside of the outer structural ring 81. The races 65 have an inwardly facing bearing surfaces, each including particularly shaped upstream and downstream sections. The upstream section of the bearing surface defines a path so that an upstream-moving sweep-forming roller 70 on the sweep unit 52 moves linearly parallel the line level of the roll former 51 (i.e., parallel a length of the continuous beam 53) (see
The rectangular floor-engaging platform 80 (
The vertical axis frame 62 (also called “sweep roll carrier” herein) (
Specifically, the vertical axis “elliptical” curvilinear bearing races 64 are located at right and left locations on an outside of the carrier 62 (
The horizontal axis frame 63 (
The reinforcing subframe 130 stabilizes the inner structural ring 100 and prevents excessive distortion despite the large stresses that the ring 100 experiences during sweeping operations. Right and left vertical axis actuators 71 (
Right and left horizontal axis actuators 72 (
When in a neutral position (
The adjustable attachment frame 69 (
It is contemplated that a snake-like internal mandrel (including a series of interconnected internal mandrels shaped to fill an inside of a cavity in a tubular beam) can be used inside of the continuous beam 53 if required. The internal mandrel (not specifically shown, but see Sturrus U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,092,512 or 5,454,504) is located between (and potentially extends upstream of and/or downstream of) the pinch-point of the forming rolls 70, and is anchored upstream by a cable that extends into the roll mill to a location upstream of where the (tubular) beam is closed and welded shut. A detailed explanation of the snake-like internal mandrel and upstream cable anchor is not required, but for example, the reader is invited to see the disclosure of Sturrus U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,092,512 and 5,454,504. It is noted that if present, internal mandrel would be designed for bending in all directions, so that the internal mandrel does not limit the multi-directional bending capabilities of the sweep unit 52. This can be accomplished in different ways, such as by providing a relatively-short single block, a string of short blocks connected together by universal joints, a flexible resiliently-bendable block, and/or a series of blocks interconnected with multiple non-parallel axles for multi-axial bending.
The backup block 68 (
Cam yoke roller and mounts 75 and cam yoke roller guide mechanisms 76 are mounted to operably engage the bearing surfaces of bearing races 64 and 65 (
Simultaneously, as the one support roller 75 moves the sweep roll 70 upstream, it's opposing support roller 75 moves downstream sweep roll 70 along the associated bearing race, constantly maintaining a same distance between the two opposing rolls 70. This causes the opposing forming roll 70 to move across the line level along a path B in an increasingly sharper transverse direction. As the roll 70 moves downstream, it maintains a same distance to the upstream-moving roller 70. This results in a very stable bending action, where the continuous beam 53 is drawn around a first (upstream) one of the forming rolls 70 by a downstream movement of an opposing forming roll 70.
Notably, the pair of opposing forming rolls 70 can be moved to bend the continuous beam in either up or down vertical directions (
Guide mechanisms 76 are also positioned on right and left sections of the inner structural ring 100 and face inwardly toward outer structural ring 81, and cam yoke roller and mounts 75 are positioned on the guide mechanisms 76 so that the associated roller 70 rollingly engages the bearing races 64. As one support roller 75 moves upstream, the bearing race 64 is shaped so that the associated forming roll 70 moves linearly parallel in an upstream direction “A” along the line level to cause the forming roll 70 to continuously engage the beam 53. Simultaneously, as the one support roller 75 moves upstream, it's opposing support roller 75 moves downstream along the associated bearing race. This causes the opposing forming roll 70 to move across the line level along a path B. This results in a very stable bending action, where the continuous beam is drawn around a first one of the forming rolls 70 by a downstream movement of an opposing forming roll 70. Notably, the pair of opposing forming rolls 70 can be moved to bend the continuous beam in either horizontal direction.
A speed, extent, and timing of movement of any of the forming rolls 70 is controlled by controller 54 which controls the actuators (cylinders 71 and 72), and a position of the components (and degree of sweep generated) is given by the sensors 73 and 74. Further, by combined movement of the forming rolls 70 about the vertical and horizontal axes, any direction of sweep can be imparted into the continuous beam 53, including a vertical sweep, a horizontal sweep, and angled sweep(s) angled in a direction between vertical and horizontal. See
In the sweep unit 52, the sweep is caused by wrapping the continuous beam around a downstream side of the opposing sweep roll 70, regardless of which direction the sweep is being formed in. This in our opinion provides a better distribution of forces on the beam during the sweeping process, and in particular tends to provide a greater zone of tension and lesser zone of compression. Notably, high tensile strength steels deform more predictably through tension and much less predictably in compression. This is due in part to the fact that when compressed, high tensile strength steels do not tend to shorten in length and gain wall thickness, but instead they tend to undulate and form snake-like back-and-forth bends while maintaining a same total wall length. It is contemplated that the capabilities of the illustrated present sweep unit can be further enhanced by placing motors on each of the sweep rolls 70, each being independently driven so that during a sweeping operation, the controller can set optimal axle speeds to optimize tensile forces and material stretching (and minimize or at least control compressive forces), thus optimizing bending uniformity and minimizing snake-like undulations in the swept portions of the beam.
The present method is configured to make non-linear structural components of high strength materials. The method includes providing a roll former with rolls configured to form a continuous beam from sheet material and defining a line level, and including a sweep unit adjacent the roll former and constructed to automatically selectively sweep the continuous beam away from the line level in multiple different directions not lying in a single plane, and including a controller operably connected to the roll former and the sweep unit for simultaneously controlling same. The method further includes roll forming a first structural beam segment, including deforming the continuous beam to have repeating identical first beam segments each with first longitudinal sections defining a first set of sweeps lying in at least two different planes. The method further includes roll forming a second structural beam including deforming the continuous beam to have repeating identical second beam segments each with second longitudinal sections defining a second set of sweeps lying in at least two different planes; with at least one of the sweeps in the first and second set of sweeps being different in radius or longitudinal length or direction or plane, such that the first and second beam segments define longitudinally-different three-dimensional shapes.
The present method contemplates forming bumper reinforcement beams by providing a roll former with forming rolls configured to form a continuous beam from sheet material and defining a line level, and including a sweep unit with sweeping rolls constructed to automatically selectively sweep the continuous beam away from the line level in multiple different directions not lying in a single plane. The present method further contemplates roll forming a first structural bumper reinforcement beam with a center section and end sections and transition sections connecting the center and end sections, the first beam when in a vehicle mounted position having its center section located a horizontal distance H1 from a line connecting ends of the end sections and a vertical distance V1 from the line connecting the ends of the end sections; and also contemplates roll forming a second structural bumper reinforcement beam with a center section and end sections and transition sections connecting the center and end sections, the second beam when in a vehicle mounted position having its center section located a horizontal distance H2 from a line connecting ends of the end sections and a vertical distance V2 from the line connecting the ends of the end sections; wherein one or both of the numbers generated by (H1 minus H2) and (V1 minus V2) is non-zero, such that the first and second beams are different shapes. The method includes securing mounts onto the beam for attachment to a vehicle frame, such as by welding, and assembling at least one of the first structural bumper reinforcement beams onto a first vehicle; and assembling at least one of the second structural bumper reinforcement beams onto a second vehicle.
The present method further contemplates manufacturing a structural component by roll forming sheet material into a continuous beam defining a longitudinal line level and sweeping the continuous beam in-line with the step of roll forming, including selectively sweeping the beam away from the longitudinal line level in both vertical and horizontal directions.
The present method includes manufacturing a structural component comprising steps of roll forming sheet material into a continuous beam defining a longitudinal line level and at least one horizontal planar wall section and at least one vertical planar wall section, and sweeping the continuous beam in-line with the step of roll forming, including selectively longitudinally sweeping the beam at an angle between vertical and horizontal directions.
The present method includes a bumper beam development including steps of using existing tooling to roll form and then selectively sweep a continuous beam from sheet material and thereafter cutting the continuous beam into non-linear first beam segments, each having a center section, end sections and transition sections that position the center section a vertical distance V1 and horizontal distance H1 from a line connecting ends of the beam segments when in a vehicle mounted position. The method further includes again using the existing tooling but changing a programmed controller to form non-linear second beam segments, each having a center section, end sections, and transition sections but that position the center sectional vertical distance V2 and horizontal distance H2, at least one of (V1 minus V2) and (H1 minus H2) being non-zero, and testing the second beam segments for impact characteristics against FMVSS and insurance bumper impact standards.
It is to be understood that variations and modifications can be made on the aforementioned structure without departing from the concepts of the present invention, and further it is to be understood that such concepts are intended to be covered by the following claims unless these claims by their language expressly state otherwise.
The present application is a continuation of patent application Ser. No. 12/872,602, filed on Aug. 31, 2010, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,333,096, issued on Dec. 18,2012; and also is a continuation of patent application Ser. No. 12/872,411, filed on Aug. 31, 2010, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,333,095, issued on Dec. 18,2012; with both said applications claiming benefit under 35 USC §119(e) of provisional application Ser. No. 61/244,253, filed Sep. 21, 2009, entitled ROLL FORMER WITH THREE-DIMENSIONAL SWEEP UNIT, the entire contents of all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1533443 | Miller | Apr 1925 | A |
1807847 | Kellogg | Jun 1931 | A |
1857325 | Ottenstein | May 1932 | A |
2242135 | Mertz | May 1941 | A |
2279197 | Hoell | Apr 1942 | A |
2335028 | Rose et al. | Nov 1943 | A |
2880013 | Dean | Mar 1959 | A |
2971556 | Armstrong et al. | Feb 1961 | A |
3076491 | Bruderlin | Feb 1963 | A |
3197990 | Stubblefield | Aug 1965 | A |
3258956 | Pinkerton et al. | Jun 1966 | A |
3452568 | Vihl | Jul 1969 | A |
3750455 | Strange et al. | Aug 1973 | A |
3756057 | Brooks, Jr. et al. | Sep 1973 | A |
3808863 | Marcovitch | May 1974 | A |
3845648 | Shubin et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
3906765 | Foster | Sep 1975 | A |
3912295 | Eggert, Jr. | Oct 1975 | A |
3986381 | Shubin et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
4117702 | Foster | Oct 1978 | A |
4354372 | Inoue et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4391116 | Yogo | Jul 1983 | A |
4530226 | Granzow et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4624121 | Kitsukawa et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4627254 | Kitsukawa et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4796449 | Berne | Jan 1989 | A |
4850212 | Frey | Jul 1989 | A |
4893489 | Mason | Jan 1990 | A |
4910984 | Young et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
5036688 | Gillean | Aug 1991 | A |
5092512 | Sturrus et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5104026 | Sturrus et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5187963 | Sutton, Jr. et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5239850 | Shimokata | Aug 1993 | A |
5305625 | Heinz | Apr 1994 | A |
5306058 | Sturrus et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5412965 | Kuramoto | May 1995 | A |
5425257 | Kitsukawa et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5454504 | Sturrus | Oct 1995 | A |
5561902 | Jacobs et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5862694 | Horning | Jan 1999 | A |
5884517 | Yogo | Mar 1999 | A |
5934544 | Lee et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5974932 | Suzuki et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6026573 | Macchione | Feb 2000 | A |
6042163 | Reiffer | Mar 2000 | A |
6079246 | Caporusso et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6183013 | Mackenzie et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6189354 | Spath | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6240820 | Sturrus et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253591 | Sayama et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6318775 | Heatherington et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6349521 | McKeon et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6386011 | Levy | May 2002 | B1 |
6484386 | Tuin et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6598446 | Meliga | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6598447 | Meliga | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6662613 | Ichiryu et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6695368 | Weykamp et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6709036 | Evans | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6725700 | Yogo | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6813920 | Yoshida et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6820451 | Renzzulla et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6910721 | Bladow et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6986536 | Heatherington et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7066525 | Jaeger et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7134310 | Hu | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7197824 | Graber | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7337642 | Lyons et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7360386 | Bair | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7530249 | Lyons et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
20020174700 | Meliga | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20040154158 | Sundgren et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040164566 | Jaeger et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050062299 | Renzzulla et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050138812 | Bladow et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050162631 | Graber | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060016078 | Bladow et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060277960 | Lyons et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070074556 | Heatherington | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070095001 | Heatherington | May 2007 | A1 |
20070180880 | Lyons et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4210227 | Sep 1993 | DE |
0362698 | Apr 1990 | EP |
0870650 | Oct 1998 | EP |
61132226 | Jun 1986 | JP |
402015831 | Jan 1990 | JP |
02037919 | Jul 1990 | JP |
6117576 | Apr 1994 | JP |
09225540 | Feb 1997 | JP |
9141329 | Jun 1997 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130047690 A1 | Feb 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61244253 | Sep 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12872602 | Aug 2010 | US |
Child | 13664791 | US | |
Parent | 12872411 | Aug 2010 | US |
Child | 12872602 | US |