Roll of a paper/boardmaking machine

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6783485
  • Patent Number
    6,783,485
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, August 20, 2003
    21 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 31, 2004
    20 years ago
Abstract
A roll for a paper or board machine is produced by forming a tubular roll blank by bending out of a planar sheet or by means of centrifugal casting. The roll blank is first coated with a material having a modulus of elasticity and a density lower than those of steel and the coated roll blank is turned on a lathe to a desired shape and to a desired surface quality.
Description




STATEMENT AS TO RIGHTS TO INVENTIONS MADE UNDER FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT




Not applicable




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




The invention relates to a method for producing a roll for a paper or board machine, and to the roll so produced.




As known from the prior art, some of the rolls in papermaking machines are made out of shell blanks by bending sheets, then after bending of the sheets the outer surface of the shell is turned on a lathe, in which connection the errors in shape caused by manufacturing inaccuracies are passed to variations in wall thickness, wherefore there arise variations in the stiffness of the shell and eccentricity of the centre of gravity of the shell with respect to its centre of rotation. The unbalance caused by the eccentricity of the centre of gravity may be minimized in the blank by proper centering and by balancing of the shell, but it is difficult to correct the stiffness variations later on. Turning causes errors in the roundness and straightness of the roll also because the blank has residual stresses and/or because the thickness of chips during machining varies. The variation of roll stiffness produces so-called semicritical vibration at a speed which is half of the critical speed of the roll. Unbalance in turn causes vibrations at all speeds.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




It is an object of the invention to propose a solution to the above-mentioned problems.




In accordance with the invention, the variation of the stiffness of the shell and its need for balancing are substantially reduced because the shell body is not turned on a lathe, but, instead, after a roll blank has been produced out of a sheet by bending, the shell is first covered by a coating and turned only after this. In that connection, the errors in shape are passed to the coating as thickness variation and, as the modulus of elasticity and the density of the coating are lower than those of steel, both the variation of the stiffness and the unbalance of the shell are substantially reduced. As the coating is used, for example, in a dryer section a material that withstands high-temperature conditions. The coating is selected such as to have a low stiffness and a low density, i.e. the density and the modulus of elasticity are low. The invention can be applied to roll blanks made of planar sheets by bending as well as in connection with centrifugally cast rolls.




In accordance with the invention, the thickness of the wall is measured and its shape is determined accordingly such that the difference in stiffness is as low as possible.




The coating can be applied to the surface of the roll by rotational casting or by vulcanizing, after which the roll is machined to a desired shape and to a desired surface quality.




The invention is most suitable for use in connection with guide rolls and nip rolls having a low nip load, such as, for example, a reeling drum.




By means of the invention, improved quality and cost savings are achieved.




In the following, the invention is described in greater detail, and the benefits of the invention are also described with reference to the accompanying drawings, to the details of which the invention is, however, by no means intended to be narrowly confined.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIGS. 1A and 1B

show a schematic comparison of differences in stiffness of a roll according to the invention and a roll produced by turning.





FIGS. 2A and 2B

show a schematic comparison relating to the eccentricity of the centre of gravity when using a roll according to the invention as compared with a roll produced by turning.





FIGS. 3A and 3B

show a schematic comparison of the principal inertias of a roll made according to the invention and a roll produced by turning.











DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




In accordance with the invention, a roll shell is bent out of a sheet blank into tubular form and its longitudinal seam is welded, and after that the shape of the tubular roll blank is measured and corrected, when needed, such that the difference in stiffness is as small as possible. After that, the roll is coated by providing, for example, by rotational casting or vulcanizing, the surface of the roll with a coating the density and the modulus of elasticity of which are considerably lower than the corresponding values of steel. The coating is machined to a desired shape and to a desired surface quality, after which the roll is ready for use and its stiffness difference and eccentricity of the centre of gravity are substantially smaller than those of a roll produced by means of known methods, as will be clear from the following series of figures and, moreover, the difference in principal inertias as a function of the diameter and the wall thickness of the roll is small.




The modulus of elasticity of the coating is 10-5000 MPa, preferably 10-4000 MPa, and its density is 0.9-3 g/cm


3


, preferably 0.9-1.5 g/cm


3


. The coating material is, for example, polyurethane, ebonite or an epoxy composite.





FIGS. 1A and 1B

show a comparison of the differences in stiffness of a roll produced in accordance with the invention and a roll produced by turning when the out-of-roundness of the blank is 1 mm.

FIG. 1A

shows a roll produced according to the invention, wherein ΔI is 0.2%, ΔI is I


1


−I


2


/I


2


·100%, and I


2


is on the horizontal axis and I


1


is on the vertical axis. In the case shown in

FIG. 1B

, ΔI is 0.61%. In the comparison, the diameter of the roll was 800 mm and the thickness of the wall was 35 mm. As seen in the figures, the difference in stiffness ΔI of the roll produced according to the invention is clearly smaller.





FIGS. 2A and 2B

show a comparison concerning the eccentricity of the centre of gravity when using the method according to the invention and a roll produced according to it or when using a roll made by turning, as known in prior art. In

FIG. 2A

, the eccentricity E of the centre of gravity=0.21 mm and, in

FIG. 2B

, the eccentricity E of the centre of gravity=4.83 mm. In the comparison used, the outside diameter D


u


of the roll=810 mm, the inside diameter D of the roll=800 mm, the thickness s of the wall of the roll=35 mm, and the eccentricity e of the blank=1.0 mm. As seen in the figures, the eccentricity of the centre of gravity of the roll according to the invention is clearly smaller.





FIGS. 3A and 3B

schematically show the difference of principal inertias as a function of the diameter and the wall thickness of the roll when the out-of-roundness of the inside bore is 1 mm and the difference in percent (%) of the principal inertias is on the Y-axis, the diameter of the roll in millimeters (mm) is on the horizontal axis and the thickness of the wall of the roll in millimeters (mm) is on the Z-axis.

FIG. 3A

shows the values for a roll produced according to the invention and

FIG. 3B

shows the values for a roll made by turning it on the outside as known in prior art. Considerably smaller differences are attained for the roll according to the invention.




As is evident from the series of figures described above, the technique according to the invention provides substantial advantages in the balance and stiffness asymmetry of the roll over the prior art arrangements.




Above, the invention has been described only with reference to some of its preferred embodiments, to the details of which the invention is, however, not by any means intended to be narrowly confined.



Claims
  • 1. A roll in a paper or board machine comprising:a roll blank defining a rotational axis, the roll blank formed of a bent planar sheet and having a longitudinal seam weld, the roll blank not having a lathe turned cylindrical surface; and a coating applied to the roll blank, the coating formed of a material that has a modulus of elasticity and a density lower than those of steel, the roll blank with applied coating having a lathe turned exterior coating surface centered about said rotational axis, such that the exterior coating surface is cylindrical with respect to the rotational axis, and the thickness of the coating when measured from the exterior coating surface of the roll blank is nonuniform.
  • 2. The roll of claim 1 wherein the coating is selected from the group consisting of polyurethane, ebonite or an epoxy composite.
  • 3. The roll of claim 1 wherein the modulus of elasticity of the coating is 10-4000 MPa.
  • 4. The roll of claim 1 wherein the density of the coating is 0.9-1.5 g/cm3.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
990702 Mar 1999 FI
CROSS REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional of U.S. App. No. 09/965,065, filed Sep. 27, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,671,958, which was a continuation of PCT/FI00/00265, filed Mar. 29, 2000, and claims priority on Finnish Application No. 990702, filed Mar. 30, 1999, the disclosures of all of which applications are incorporated by reference herein.

US Referenced Citations (15)
Number Name Date Kind
3877919 Shorr Apr 1975 A
4065841 Gysin Jan 1978 A
4368568 Watanabe Jan 1983 A
4705711 Perna Nov 1987 A
4903597 Hoage et al. Feb 1990 A
4925014 Haite May 1990 A
5713408 Morando Feb 1998 A
5857950 Hycner Jan 1999 A
5895689 Gajewski Apr 1999 A
6095957 Ichno et al. Aug 2000 A
6158340 Venturati Dec 2000 A
6253671 Kayser Jul 2001 B1
6406784 Cerrah Jun 2002 B1
20030171198 Bagusche Sep 2003 A1
20030181303 Leinonen et al. Sep 2003 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
60-129417 Jul 1985 JP
WO 9533143 Dec 1995 WO
WO 0058638 Oct 2000 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (4)
Entry
National Board of Patents and Registration Official Action dated Feb. 17, 2000, with translation.
National Board of Patents and Registration Official Action of Approval dated Apr. 25, 2000, with translation.
National Board of Patents and Registration Office Communication dated Jul. 4, 2000, with translation.
International Preliminary Examination Report for PCT/FI00/00265.
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent PCT/FI00/00265 Mar 2000 US
Child 09/965065 US