The invention concerns a rolling mill for producing plane rolled strips having a desired strip profile superelevation, with work rolls supported on at least one backup roll, such that the work rolls have different diameters, and the thicker work roll is connected with a drive, while the thinner work roll follows as an idle roll.
Rolling mills using work rolls with different diameters are well known. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 2,139,872 describes a rolling mill in which, to achieve the most effective possible reduction in the rolled strip during rolling, there are two work rolls with different diameters supported on backup rolls. In this regard, it was found to be advantageous to drive only the larger work roll and to let the smaller work roll follow as an idle roll. Previously known rolling mills of this type are advantageously used in the rear stands of a rolling train with the goal of reducing the rolling force and the driving power and achieving a smaller edge drop, especially in the case of high-carbon steel.
In the hot rolling of strip material, the thermal crown and the wear of the work rolls and their elastic deformations are subject to relatively large variations within a rolling program. Without correction by final control elements, the strip contour changes with increasing throughput of rolled material. This effect varies from stand to stand and from pass to pass. Accordingly, variations occur not only in the strip contour, but also in the predetermined hot strip flatness and eventually in the cold strip flatness.
The object of the invention is to further modify the well-known rolling mill with its different work roll diameters in such a way that a strip of high quality is produced, and these stands can be universally used.
This object is achieved in a rolling mill of the specified type by the characterizing features of claim 1 in such a way that:
As a result of the combination, in accordance with the invention, of providing the well-known, different-sized work rolls with a CVC grind (described, for example, in DE 37 120 43 C2; in this connection, the CVC grind or the roll contour obeys a polynomial of second or higher order) and of arranging the work rolls and backup rolls in such a way that they can be displaced both axially and in the discharge direction, a totally new rolling stand concept is obtained, which, in contrast to the previously known rolling stands, can be universally used and produces the rolled strips with a high degree of flatness and the desired strip profile superelevation.
With these rolling stands, it is advantageous to calculate and exceute the grind by a polynomial of the third or higher order, including, for example, the fifth order, as the profile final control element for the CVC grind of the work rolls. For example, a fifth-order polynomial of general form:
R(x)=a5·x5+a4·x4+a3·x3+a2·x2+a1·x+a0
would then have the following parameters, e.g., for a roll 1,900 mm long, specifically,
Since the work rolls have different diameters, they also show different deflection and flattening behavior. Particularly the effects between the backup rolls and the work rolls are different. This is especially the case for a three-high rolling stand, in which only the thinner work roll is supported by a backup roll, since the thicker work roll has no support at all. Therefore, in accordance with the invention, the contours of the work rolls are designed differently in order to compensate these effects. In this regard, the calculation of the necessary contour is done offline with the goal of producing a roll gap that is symmetrical under load.
The new rolling stand concept is especially applicable to a three-high rolling stand of this type. These stands can then also be advantageously used for the front stands, for example, for loads that are not too high. In this three-high rolling stand as well, only the thicker work roll is driven, and the thinner work roll follows as an idle roll. The thicker work roll acts as the work roll, which can transmit a high torque and at the same time serves as a backup roll. The combination with the other, thinner work roll, which is supported by a separate backup roll, then results in controllable rolling forces.
Since strip turn-up (bending up of the forward edges of the strip) can be expected as a result of the given boundary conditions with the use of work rolls with different diameters, especially in the case of the rolling of thick strip, in accordance with the invention, one of the work rolls is arranged in such a way that it can be displaced in the discharge direction for the purpose of preventing this turn-up of the strip. The adjustment of this roll displacement is controlled, among other ways, as a function of the run-in and runout thickness, the material strength of the rolled strip, the actual diameter combination of the work rolls, etc.
In the case of a rolling stand that contains a nondriven smaller work roll and is not pretensioned (before the initial pass, the roll gap corresponds approximately to the strip run-in thickness), it is advantageous for the nondriven work roll also to be provided with an auxiliary drive, which can then be disconnected and/or shut off after the initial pass. The vibrations that frequently occur in the forward stands during rolling (the work rolls swinging against each other) are prevented by this measure, since then the work rolls are decoupled with respect to the drive. In addition, the auxiliary drive advantageously also allows a possibly necessary axial displacement of the work rolls during rolling pauses.
In order to compensate the boundary conditions resulting from the different work roll diameters, it is also possible, in accordance with the invention, to adjust different work roll bending forces for each of the work rolls and for each of their sides as a function of the sliding position of each of the rolls. Furthermore, to counter the higher surface pressing between the thin work roll with its backup roll, these rolls can be suitably lengthened.
In order to counter the different wear of the work rolls due to their different diameters, the work rolls are produced from materials with different wear behavior or from highly wear-resistant materials, for example, by a powder metallurgical process, preferably the HIP process (hot isostatic pressing). As is described in the offprint from “Stahl” (1998), No. 6, pp. 38–40, in the HIP process, the material to be treated is heated above its yield point in special autoclaves (HIP systems) at high temperature (up to 2,000° C., depending on the material) and with pressure applied from all directions (up to 200 MPa) and simultaneously compacted.
Further details of the invention are explained in greater detail below with reference to specific embodiments illustrated in the drawings.
In accordance with the invention, the contours of the surfaces of the work rolls 1, 2 with their assigned backup rolls 3, 4 are produced by a CVC grind, which is calculated by a polynomial of at least second order (in the side view of the rolling stand 10 shown in the drawing, this CVC grind is not visible). For example, the upper work roll 1 may have a diameter of 400 mm, the lower work roll 2 a diameter of 600 mm, and each of the backup rolls 3, 4 a diameter of 1,350 mm.
The examples illustrated in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
101 02 821 | Jan 2001 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP02/00479 | 1/18/2002 | WO | 00 | 7/19/2003 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO02/058860 | 8/1/2002 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1744017 | Steckel | Jan 1930 | A |
2139872 | Worthington | Dec 1938 | A |
3648496 | Petry et al. | Mar 1972 | A |
3857268 | Kajiwaka | Dec 1974 | A |
4184353 | Sebardt et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4194382 | Kajiwara | Mar 1980 | A |
4577480 | Kizaki et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4800742 | Feldmann et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4881396 | Seidel et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
5560237 | Yasuda et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3219554 | Dec 1982 | DE |
3401894 | Jul 1985 | DE |
3712043 | Oct 1988 | DE |
1033182 | Sep 2000 | EP |
2100472 | Dec 1982 | GB |
59087911 | May 1984 | JP |
61235007 | Oct 1986 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040040358 A1 | Mar 2004 | US |