The present application is a 35 U.S.C. §§ 371 national phase conversion of PCT/EP2019/067939, filed Jul. 4, 2019, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference, which claims priority of European Patent Application No. 18185862.2, filed Jul. 26, 2018, the contents of which are incorporated by reference herein. The PCT International Application was published in the German language.
The present invention is based on a roll stand for rolling flat metal rolling stock,
Such roll stands are generally known. Reference can be made purely by way of example to U.S. Pat. No. 8,281,632 B2, in particular to the embodiments described as prior art therein.
During hot-rolling of flat rolling stock made of metal, for example steel, the working rollers heat up. For various technological reasons, for example for targeted influencing of the thermal crown and for minimizing wear, the working rollers are cooled. Intensive cooling is therefore required in order in particular for the heat supplied via the flat rolling stock to be removed again from the working rollers. Various embodiments are known for cooling the working rollers.
It is thus for example in U.S. Pat. No. 8,281,632 B2 that each of the upper and lower working rollers is assigned a water box which is in close contact with the respective working roller on the outlet side of the roll stand. The respective water box generates a turbulent water flow which efficiently cools the working rollers. A disadvantage of this teaching is that the water boxes have to be positioned very precisely in relation to the working rollers. If the distance is too small, there is the risk of damage to the working rollers and/or to the water boxes. If the distance is too large, efficient cooling cannot take place.
A similar procedure can be found in DE 10 2009 053 074 A1. The same applies for WO 2008/149 195 A1 and also for the specialist paper “Implementation of High Turbulence Roll Cooling at ArcelorMittal Dofasco's Hot Strip Mill” by Zafer Koont, published in Iron and Steel Technology, November 2014, pages 43 to 51.
EP 3 308 868 A1 discloses a roll stand in which a single cooling boom is arranged on the outlet side of the roll stand. The cooling boom has a plurality of rows of spray nozzles, and the rows extend in the width direction of the rolling stock or parallel to the working rollers. The spray nozzles of the rows are designed as full-jet nozzles. Although this embodiment allows intensive cooling of the working rollers, a considerable degree of complexity is required to ensure uniform cooling over the entire width of the working rollers.
The most frequent embodiment is the one stated at the outset. Its advantages are in particular the relatively simple construction and the operational reliability.
The roll stands have additional elements. One additional element is an upper wiping element which applies the coolant to the upper working roller on the outlet side is scraped off the upper working roller. The wiping element is required to prevent the coolant from running down onto the flat rolling stock in an uncontrolled manner and influencing its temperature in an uncontrolled manner.
Above the upper wiping element, a pool of the liquid coolant is frequently formed. This pool negatively influences the cooling by the flat-jet nozzles. The desired cooling of the upper working roller can therefore often be implemented only with difficulty.
The object of the present invention is to configure a roll stand of the type stated at the outset in such a way that, in combination with a simple structure, a highly efficient and uniform cooling of the upper working roller can be achieved.
According to the invention, a roll stand of the type stated at the outset is configured by at least some of the lower spray nozzles, and as a rule all lower spray nozzles, being designed as full-jet nozzles.
Full-jet nozzles are spray nozzles which emit a substantially straight coolant jet. The coolant jet usually has a circular or virtually circular cross section. The cross section varies only to a very minor extent with the distance from the full-jet nozzle. In particular, an opening angle of the emitted coolant jet is at most 5°. By contrast, flat-jet nozzles have a spray pattern in which the emitted coolant jet widens in a fan-like manner. The opening angle of the fan is at least 20°. In practice, it is usually 40° or more. The coolant emitted by a flat-jet nozzle thus strikes the upper working roller substantially in the form of an elongate line.
As a result of the bundled emission of the coolant, and for the same coolant pressure in the respective spray boom, full-jet nozzles generate a considerably higher impact pressure on the working roller than flat-jet nozzles. The higher impact pressure produces not only a higher cooling action. Of special importance in particular, is the fact that the full jet is also capable of completely penetrating the pool of coolant that may have formed on the upper wiping element.
In the simplest case, exclusively the upper and the lower spray booms are assigned to the upper working roller on the outlet side. Alternatively, however, it is possible for the roll stand to have at least one central spray boom. The at least one central spray boom is in this case arranged between the upper and the lower spray booms. It extends parallel to the upper working roller and has a plurality of central spray nozzles which spray the liquid coolant onto the upper working roller. The central spray nozzles of each central spray boom are as a rule, at least in a central region of the respective central spray boom, designed either uniformly as flat-jet nozzles or uniformly as full-jet nozzles. If it is for example that two central spray booms are present, it is possible for the spray nozzles of both central spray booms to be designed uniformly as flat-jet nozzles. Alternatively, it is possible for the spray nozzles of both central spray booms to be designed uniformly as full-jet nozzles. Again alternatively, it is possible for the spray nozzles of the one central spray boom to be designed uniformly as flat-jet nozzles, and for the spray nozzles of the other central spray boom to be designed uniformly as full-jet nozzles. By contrast, an embodiment in which the spray nozzles of one central spray boom are partially designed as flat-jet nozzles and partially designed as full-jet nozzles is indeed possible, but not preferred.
The upper spray boom, the central spray booms and the lower spray boom form a sequence of spray booms as viewed from the top down. A change from flat-jet nozzles to full-jet nozzles preferably occurs only a single time within the sequence of spray booms for regions of the spray booms that correspond to one another in the width direction of the flat rolling stock. If thus for example the spray nozzles are designed as full-jet nozzles in a specific central spray boom, it is also preferable that the spray nozzles are designed as full-jet nozzles in each further spray boom that is situated below this central spray boom. In an analogous manner, if the spray nozzles are designed as flat-jet nozzles in a specific central spray boom, it is preferable that the spray nozzles are designed as flat-jet nozzles in each further spray boom that is situated above this central spray boom.
Flat-jet nozzles are as a rule operated at a relatively high working pressure, which can be up to 20 bar. By contrast, full-jet nozzles can be operated at a lower pressure. It is therefore preferable for the coolant supplied to the full-jet nozzles to be applied at a first working pressure and for the coolant supplied to the flat-jet nozzles to be applied at a second working pressure. The first working pressure is as a rule less than the second working pressure. For example, the first working pressure can be at most 5 bar, whereas the second working pressure is at least 6 bar. It is customary to have a first working pressure of 1 to 4 bar, in particular of 2 to 3 bar, whereas the second working pressure is as a rule between 10 and 20 bar, and usually between 12 and 16 bar. However, other working pressures are also possible, for example a first working pressure of approximately 7 bar and a second working pressure of approximately 8 bar. In individual cases, the first working pressure can even be greater than the second working pressure. It is also possible for the coolant supplied to the full-jet nozzles and the coolant supplied to the flat-jet nozzles to be applied at a uniform working pressure. This working pressure can be up to 10 bar.
The above-described properties, features and advantages of this invention and also the manner in which they are achieved will become clearer and more readily understandable in connection with the following description of the exemplary embodiments which will be explained in more detail in conjunction with the drawings, in which, in schematic illustration:
According to
The roll stand 1 can be a constituent part of a multi-stand rolling train, for example of a finishing train. In this case, the transport direction x is as a rule fixedly prescribed and the same in each rolling operation. This configuration is particularly the rule for a metal strip. Alternatively, the roll stand 1 can be designed as a reversing roll stand. In this case, the transport direction x reverses from rolling pass to rolling pass. Reversing stands are used in particular for rolling plate. However, they are sometimes also used for rolling metal strip, for example during rough rolling or in a Steckel mill.
In addition to the working rollers 3, 4, the flat rolling stock 2 as a rule has at least one upper and one lower backup roller 6, 7. It is also sometimes possible for further rollers to be present, for example an upper and a lower intermediate roller in the case of a six-high stand. The backup rollers 6, 7 and where appropriate also the intermediate rollers are of minor importance within the context of the present invention. It is also of minor importance within the context of the present invention whether the working rollers 3, 4 and/or any present intermediate rollers are axially displaceable. Therefore, no more detailed discussion will be given below in relation to the backup rollers 6, 7, the intermediate rollers and the axial displaceability of working rollers 3, 4 and/or intermediate rollers.
According to
Furthermore, each present cooling device 8 to 11 is assigned a wiping element 13 to 16. The respective wiping element 13 to 16 allows the liquid coolant 12 applied to the respective working roller 3, 4 to be scraped off the respective working roller 3, 4 in order that it does not get onto the flat rolling stock 2. Of decisive importance within the context of the present invention is the configuration of the upper cooling device 8 arranged on the outlet side of the roll stand 1. Although it is possible for the upper cooling device 10 arranged on the inlet side of the roll stand 1 to be designed in the same way, it can equally also be designed in some other way. It is only if the roll stand 1 is operated as a reversing stand that this cooling device 10 also has to be designed in the same way since the inlet side and outlet side are alternated in each rolling pass with respect to the preceding rolling pass. It is equally possible for the lower cooling devices 9, 11 to be designed in a similar manner to the upper cooling devices 8, 10. In this case, the statements below pertaining to the configuration of the upper cooling device 8 would apply in mirror-image fashion. However, they can also be designed in some other ways. Since the configuration of the lower cooling devices 9, 11 and of the cooling devices 10, 11 arranged on the inlet side of the roll stand 1 is of minor importance within the context of the present invention, only the upper cooling device 8 arranged on the outlet side of the roll stand 1 will be explained in more detail below.
According to
The spray booms 17 to 20 extend parallel to the upper working roller 3. Directions of extent of the spray booms 17 to 20 thus run parallel to the axis of rotation 21 of the upper working roller 3. Each spray boom 17 to 20 has a plurality of spray nozzles 22 to 25. The spray nozzles 22 to 25 are arranged next to one another as viewed in the direction of extent of the respective spray boom 17 to 20. The liquid coolant 12 is sprayed onto the upper working roller 3 by means of the spray nozzles 22 to 25. The spray nozzles 22 of the upper spray boom 17 are referred to below as upper spray nozzles 22, and the spray nozzles 23 of the lower spray boom 18 as lower spray nozzles. Likewise, the spray nozzles 24, 25 of the central spray booms 19, 20 are referred to as central spray nozzles. Distinguishing them as upper, lower and central spray nozzles 22 to 25 serves only for assigning them to the respective spray boom 17 to 20. No further significance is ascribed to the referencing.
In the embodiment according to
The central spray nozzles 24, 25 can be designed as flat-jet nozzles or as full-jet nozzles as required. However, each central spray boom 19, 20 preferably has only a single type of spray nozzles, that is to say either flat-jet nozzles or full-jet nozzles, but not mixed flat-jet nozzles and full-jet nozzles. At least, this statement applies as viewed in the width direction of the flat rolling stock 2 in a central region of the respective central spray boom 19, 20. With respect to in each case one of the central spray booms 19, 20, the spray nozzles 24, 25 of the respective central spray boom 19, 20 are thus designed uniformly.
The spray booms 17 to 20 form as viewed from the top down a sequence of spray booms 17, 19, 20, 18. A change from flat-jet nozzles to full-jet nozzles preferably occurs only a single time within the sequence of spray booms 17, 19, 20, 18. It is thus possible for the spray nozzles 24, 25 of both central spray booms 19, 20 to be designed as full-jet nozzles. In this case, the change from flat-jet nozzles to full-jet nozzles occurs at the transition from the upper spray boom 17 to the upper central spray boom 19. It is equally possible for the spray nozzles 24, 25 of both central spray booms 19, 20 to be designed as flat-jet nozzles. In this case, the change from flat-jet nozzles to full-jet nozzles occurs at the transition from the lower central spray boom 20 to the lower spray boom 18. It is equally possible for the spray nozzles 24, 25 of in each case one of the two central spray booms 19, 20 to be designed as flat-jet nozzles and as full-jet nozzles. In this case, the change from flat-jet nozzles to full-jet nozzles occurs in accordance with the illustration in
It is furthermore evident from
With respect to the operation of the cooling device 8, in accordance with the illustration in
The two working pressures p1, p2 can be set independently of one another by the control device 28. However, in the embodiment according to
Alternatively, it is possible, in accordance with the illustration in
The present invention has many advantages. In particular, the lower region of the upper working roller 3 can be effectively cooled even when a liquid pool has formed on the associated wiping element 13. Furthermore, it is also possible in a simple manner for a conventional cooling arrangement (not according to the invention) of an existing roll stand 1 to be correspondingly retrofitted. All that is required is for the already present lowermost spray boom to be removed and replaced by a lower spray boom 17 according to the invention. Furthermore, the angular range over which the cooling occurs can be maximized as viewed in the circumferential direction of the upper working roller 3. In particular, the cooling can be begun already directly above the upper wiping element 13 arranged on the outlet side of the roll stand 1.
Although the invention has been more fully illustrated and described in detail by way of the preferred exemplary embodiment, the invention is thus not limited by the disclosed examples and other variants can be derived therefrom by a person skilled in the art without departing from the scope of protection of the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
18185862 | Jul 2018 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2019/067939 | 7/4/2019 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2020/020592 | 1/30/2020 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5212975 | Ginzburg | May 1993 | A |
5799523 | Seidel et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
6450000 | Barten | Sep 2002 | B2 |
8281632 | Uijtdebroeks et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
20010027672 | Barten | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20120031159 | Seidel | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20130305799 | Ogawa | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20190308233 | Opitz et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1151914 | Jun 1997 | CN |
102421541 | Apr 2012 | CN |
202238899 | May 2012 | CN |
104874614 | Sep 2015 | CN |
108927409 | Dec 2018 | CN |
200 06 508 | Aug 2000 | DE |
10 2009 053 073 | Sep 2010 | DE |
10 2009 053 074 | Sep 2010 | DE |
3 308 868 | Apr 2018 | EP |
2483817 | Jun 2013 | RU |
900894 | Jan 1982 | SU |
1227275 | Apr 1986 | SU |
WO 2008149195 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO 2018073086 | Apr 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report dated Aug. 9, 2019 in corresponding PCT International Application No. PCT/EP2019/067939. |
Written Opinion ated Aug. 9, 2019 in corresponding PCT International Application No. PCT/EP2019/067939. |
European Search Report dated Jan. 15, 2019 in corresponding European Patent Application No. 18185862.2. |
Z. Koont et al., “Implementation of High Turbulence Roll Cooling at ArcelorMittal Dofasco's Hot Strip Mill,” Iron and Steel Technology, Nov. 2014, pp. 43-51. |
Chinese Office Action, dated Jun. 1, 2022, issued in corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201980049887.4. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210245214 A1 | Aug 2021 | US |