Roll stand, particularly push roll stand

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9770745
  • Patent Number
    9,770,745
  • Date Filed
    Monday, February 9, 2009
    15 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 26, 2017
    7 years ago
Abstract
The invention relates to a roller device (50) having a stand and two roller sets having at least two rollers (52, 53, 54, 55) disposed in a stand (51) of the roller device, wherein a roll material (56) can be fed between two rollers (53, 54) of the two roller sets for rolling, wherein at least the rollers (52, 53) of a roller set can be displaced in the rolling direction relative to the stand (51), wherein adjustment means are provided between a roller bearing for receiving the rollers and the stand, each on both sides of the roller bearing. It is thereby particularly advantageous if the circumferential speeds of the rollers, such as the working rollers, are different.
Description
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is the US national stage of PCT application PCT/EP2009/000874, filed 9 Feb. 2009, published 27 Aug. 2009 as WO2009/103436, and claiming the priority of German patent application 102008009902.3 itself filed 19 Feb. 2008, whose entire disclosures are herewith incorporated by reference.


FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to a roll stand, in particular a pusher-type roll stand for flat rolling and having a frame and two sets each having two or more rolls mounted in the frame of the roll stand so that a workpiece can be fed between two rolls of the two sets for rolling.


PRIOR ART

Roll stands are well known in the prior art. A roll stand for flat rolling usually symmetrically deforms the workpiece between working rolls. To this end the roll diameter, the peripheral speed, and the frictional conditions of both working rolls are made as equal as possible such that only the slightest variations are present. Such roll stands have become known, for example, from DE 33 23 641 [U.S. Pat. No. 4,631,948].


Furthermore, there are roll stands where the peripheral speeds of the two working rolls are different. Such roll stands have become known, for example, from DE 28 33 990 [U.S. Pat. No. 4,385,511]. In so-called push rolls or asymmetrical rolls the processing conditions are chosen to be not equal, but selectively unequal for both working rolls. Although this has the advantage that roll force is reduced due to shear, this also has disadvantages. The disadvantages include the so-called ski effect, that is uneven metal properties across the thickness of the sheet metal, and an uneven loading of the drive trains of the rolls, and thus of their motors.


This also results in the fact that push rolls are normally not used in the production of sheet metal at all, because the disadvantages outweigh the advantages.


OBJECT OF THE INVENTION

The object of the invention is therefore to create a roll stand by means of which the disadvantages of prior art may be reduced, if not even avoided altogether.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

According to the invention the object is attained by a roll stand having a frame and two sets each having two or more rolls mounted in the frame of the roll stand so that a workpiece can be fed between two rolls of the two sets for rolling, and wherein the rolls of at least one of the roll sets are displaceable in a rolling direction relative to the frame, adjustment means being provided on each side between the roll mounts of the one set and the frame.


It is also advantageous if the adjusters are mounted on each side of each of the two rolls.


It is also preferable if the adjusters are mounted essentially horizontally level with the respective roll and/or of the respective roll axis in the direction as viewed perpendicular to the rolling direction.


It is further advantageous, if the displaceable roll set has a common roll mount for its two rolls, the adjusters engaging the roll mount essentially horizontally level with the respective roll in the direction as viewed perpendicular to the rolling direction.


Accordingly, it is advantageous if the upper roll set and/or the lower roll set is displaceable.


According to one aspect according to the invention it is advantageous if at least one roll, such as the working rolls, of the upper roll set and of the lower roll sets have a different diameter.


It is further advantageous if the adjusters have is hydraulic and/or mechanical actuators.


It is also advantageous if the roll axes of the rolls of the roll sets are parallel to each other.


To this end it may also be advantageous if the rolls, such as in particular the working rolls, of both roll sets can be operated at different rotational or peripheral speeds.


Advantageous further improvements are described in the dependent claims.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The invention is described in further detail below with reference to an illustrated embodiment based on the drawings. Therein:



FIG. 1 is a schematic view of working rolls,



FIG. 2 is a schematic view of working rolls,



FIG. 3 is a schematic view of working rolls,



FIG. 4 is a schematic view of working rolls,



FIG. 5 is a schematic view of working rolls, and



FIG. 6 is a schematic view of a roll stand.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION


FIG. 1 schematically shows at 1 two working rolls 2 and 3 rolling a workpiece 4 with symmetrical orientation of the rolls 2 and 3. To this end a deforming zone 5 of the workpiece 4 is of a symmetrical shape.



FIG. 2 schematically shows at 10 two working rolls 11 and 12 rolling a workpiece 13 with asymmetrical rolling condition but a symmetrical orientation of the rolls 11 and 12. To this end the deforming zone 14 of the workpiece 13 is of an asymmetrical shape. The rolls 11 and 12 are of different sizes. The roll 11 has a smaller diameter than the roll 12. Although the roll arrangement of FIG. 2 has a horizontal workpiece travel path, the workpiece infeed direction is asymmetrical and angled downward toward the second roll 12.



FIG. 3 schematically shows at 20 two working rolls 21 and 22 rolling a workpiece 23 with asymmetrical rolling conditions in a symmetrical arrangement of the rolls 21 and 22. To this end a deforming zone 24 of the workpiece 23 is again of an asymmetrical shape. The rolls 21 and 22 are also of different sizes. To this end the roll 21 has a smaller diameter than the roll 22. The roll arrangement of FIG. 3 also has an asymmetrical workpiece travel path 25 and an asymmetrical workpiece infeed direction 26 that is angled downward, and the travel path 25 is angled upward toward the first roll 22. It is clearly visible that the workpiece 23 does not move horizontally through the roll stand, but runs in and out at an angle to the horizontal. The workpiece thus bend as it moves along the travel path 25.



FIG. 4 schematically shows at 30 two working rolls 31 and 32 rolling a workpiece 33 with asymmetrical rolling conditions in a symmetrical arrangement of the rolls 31 and 32. To this end the deforming zone 34 of the workpiece 33 is again of an asymmetrical shape. The rolls 31 and 32 are of essentially the same size. The roll arrangement of FIG. 4 also has an asymmetrical workpiece outfeed direction 35 and an asymmetrical workpiece infeed direction 36 that is angled downward, the outgoing travel path 35 also angled downward from above. Again, it is clearly visible that the workpiece 33 does not move on the horizontal through the roll stand, but runs in and out at an angle to the horizontal. The workpiece 33 does not bend as it moves along its travel path 35. This is achieved by the accurately matched adjustment of rolling parameters. For example, the peripheral speeds of the working rolls may be the adjusted roll parameters.



FIG. 5 schematically shows at 40 of two working rolls 41 and 42 mounted at an offset to one another, rolling a workpiece 43 with asymmetrical rolling conditions in an offset arrangement of the rolls 41 and 42. The horizontal offset is a dimension R. To this end the deforming zone 44 of the workpiece 43 is again of an asymmetrical shape. The rolls 41 and 42 are of the same size in the embodiment of FIG. 5. The roll arrangement of FIG. 5 also has a horizontal workpiece outfeed direction 45 and a horizontal workpiece infeed direction 46, the infeed direction 46 and the outfeed direction 45 being essentially parallel. The workpiece 43 does not bend as it moves along the travel path 45. The peripheral speeds of the working rolls are also selected accordingly.



FIG. 6 schematically shows a roll stand 50 where rolls 52, 53, 54, 55 form roll sets 52, 53 and 54, 55 are mounted in a frame 51. To this end an upper roll set 52, 53 and a lower roll set 54, 55 is provided, with working rolls 53 and 54 that roll and deform a workpiece 56 on both faces of the workpiece 56. In the embodiment of FIG. 6 the lower roll set is essentially mounted so that it cannot move in the longitudinal direction of the workpiece 56, its rolls 54 and 55 being supported in respective roll mounts 57 and 58. The rolls 52 and 53 of the upper roll set are advantageously mounted so that the can move in the rolling direction, or in the direction of the extension of the workpiece. To this end the rolls 52 and 53 together with the respective roll mounts 59 and 60 are displaceable by adjusters 61a, 61b, 62a, 62b. To this end the adjusters 61a, 61b, 62a, 62b may have mechanical and/or hydraulic actuators. They are mounted on both sides of the roll mounts 59 and 60, and serve for supporting the roll mounts 59 and 60 in the frame 51 and for changing the position of the respective rolls 52 and 53 in the rolling direction. The figure further shows a mechanism 63 for mechanical vertically shifting the upper rolls relative to the lower rolls, and a support 64 for the lower rolls.


In a further illustrated embodiment the lower rolls may be displaceable and adjustable in the rolling direction, instead of the upper rolls. In another illustrated embodiment the lower rolls may also be displaceable and adjustable in the rolling direction in addition to the upper rolls.


Due to the adjustability of the roll sets the roll stand may be operated such that the roll sets are not displaced relative to each other in the rolling direction, and also such that the roll sets are displaced relative to each other.


It is of particular advantage in a roll stand according to the invention, such as the device according to FIG. 6, that the displaceable roll set 52 and 53 comprises two or more rolls, adjusters 61a, 61b, 62a, 62b being mounted on both sides of each of the two or more rolls 52 and 53. The adjusters 61a, 61b, 62a, 62b are essentially mounted horizontally level with the respective rolls 52 and 53. To this end FIG. 6 shows that the center point or the axis of the each roll is positioned approximately level with the respective adjusters 61a, 61b, 62a, 62b as viewed in a direction perpendicular to the rolling direction. In FIG. 6 the displaceable roll set 52 and 53 has a common roll mount 59 and 60 for two or more rolls 52 and 53, the adjusters 61a, 61b, 62a, 62b engaging the roll mount 59 and 60 essentially horizontally level with the respective rolls as viewed in the direction perpendicular to the rolling direction.

Claims
  • 1. A roll stand for flat rolling a workpiece moving in a predetermined direction, the stand comprising: a frame;an upper backing roll and an upper working roll forming an upper roll set in the frame and rotatable about respective vertically spaced and parallel upper axes transverse to the direction;a lower working roll and a lower backing roll below the upper set and forming a lower roll set in the frame below the upper set and rotatable about respective vertically spaced and parallel lower axes transverse to the direction, the working rolls defining a gap through which the workpiece passes in the direction, the working rolls being of smaller diameter than the respective backing rolls, the upper and lower working rolls being of the same diameter, the upper and lower axes all being parallel;a mount shiftable in the direction on the frame and on which both of the rolls of one of the sets are pivotally mounted; andrespective pairs of vertically spaced adjusters braced between the frame and the mount upstream and downstream in the direction and generally level with the axes of the respective rolls of the one set for shifting both of the rolls of the one set in the direction relative to the frame through a horizontal offset between the working rolls of between 50 mm and 120 mm.
  • 2. The roll stand according to claim 1 wherein the roll diameters of the working rolls are between 550 and 1400 mm.
  • 3. The roll stand according to claim 1 wherein the adjusters have hydraulic and/or mechanical actuators.
  • 4. The roll stand according to claim 1 wherein the rotational speeds differ by between 1% and 20%.
  • 5. The roll stand according to claim 1 wherein a reduction of thickness at the workpiece is between 1 mm and 75 mm.
  • 6. The roll stand defined in claim 1, further comprising means for rotating one of the working rolls at a peripheral speed greater than a peripheral speed of the other of the working rolls.
  • 7. The roll stand defined in claim 1 wherein the travel direction extends at at least one side of the frame at an acute angle to a horizontal plane.
  • 8. The roll stand defined in claim 1 wherein the other set of rollers is fixed against shifting in the direction relative to the frame.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
10 2008 009 902 Feb 2008 DE national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind 371c Date
PCT/EP2009/000874 2/9/2009 WO 00 11/16/2009
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2009/103436 8/27/2009 WO A
US Referenced Citations (86)
Number Name Date Kind
1614424 Coe Jan 1927 A
1636057 Jones Jul 1927 A
1739156 Lindquist Dec 1929 A
1779195 Steckel Oct 1930 A
1860931 Keller May 1932 A
1864299 Fawell Jun 1932 A
1892933 Coryell Jan 1933 A
1900344 Iversen Mar 1933 A
RE18992 Iversen Nov 1933 E
2025002 McIlvried Dec 1935 A
2139872 Worthington May 1937 A
2157455 Kimmel May 1939 A
2271459 McConnell Jan 1942 A
2287851 Zeitlin Jun 1942 A
2767602 Henrickson Oct 1956 A
2792730 Cozzo May 1957 A
2922325 Forster Jan 1960 A
3077800 Taylor Feb 1963 A
3164044 Trapp Jan 1965 A
3171304 Sims et al. Mar 1965 A
3233445 Norlindh Feb 1966 A
3242711 Fox Mar 1966 A
3247697 Cozzo Apr 1966 A
3307386 Ward et al. Mar 1967 A
3310971 Tanaka et al. Mar 1967 A
3431762 O'Brien Mar 1969 A
3501936 Stubbs Mar 1970 A
3546914 Leifeld et al. Dec 1970 A
3665743 Frohling May 1972 A
3693393 Nellen et al. Sep 1972 A
3740982 Hacker et al. Jun 1973 A
3811307 Vydrin et al. May 1974 A
4237714 Polukhin et al. Dec 1980 A
4385511 Vydrin May 1983 A
4402207 Buder Sep 1983 A
4453393 Hino et al. Jun 1984 A
4548064 Bohnenkamp Oct 1985 A
4580428 Brettbacher et al. Apr 1986 A
4599883 Ginzburg et al. Jul 1986 A
4631948 Bald et al. Dec 1986 A
4736609 Schiller et al. Apr 1988 A
4805492 Tsuruda Feb 1989 A
4918965 Kobayashi et al. Apr 1990 A
4976128 Tajima Dec 1990 A
5038591 Tajima et al. Aug 1991 A
5291770 Koujin et al. Mar 1994 A
5560237 Yasuda et al. Oct 1996 A
5765424 Mantovan Jun 1998 A
5809821 Figge Sep 1998 A
5924319 Ginzburg Jul 1999 A
6085567 Cattaneo et al. Jul 2000 A
6151943 Nihei et al. Nov 2000 A
6250126 Yasuda et al. Jun 2001 B1
6266988 Kimura et al. Jul 2001 B1
6354128 Donini et al. Mar 2002 B1
6510721 Yamamoto et al. Jan 2003 B1
6820453 Takahashi et al. Nov 2004 B2
6895794 Yamamoto et al. May 2005 B2
6959571 Yamamoto et al. Nov 2005 B2
7188496 Karam et al. Mar 2007 B2
7225657 Slawinski Jun 2007 B2
7251978 Seidel et al. Aug 2007 B2
7491276 Wehage et al. Feb 2009 B2
7757531 Klockner et al. Jul 2010 B2
7895871 Zieser et al. Mar 2011 B2
20020078729 Bunten Jun 2002 A1
20030019271 Yamamoto et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030024293 Yamamoto et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030101787 Takahashi et al. Jun 2003 A1
20040040358 Seidel et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040187538 Denker Sep 2004 A1
20050247095 Slawinski Nov 2005 A1
20060254335 Turley Nov 2006 A1
20070051153 Breuer et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070245794 Brandenfels et al. Oct 2007 A1
20080115551 Marc et al. May 2008 A1
20080250836 Gouttebroze et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080271508 Kruger et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090183544 Pawelski et al. Jul 2009 A1
20100252223 Franz et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100288007 Ogawa et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100300170 Bentoski et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110000271 Ogawa et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110005290 Norikura Jan 2011 A1
20110132055 Diehl et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110239723 Diehl et al. Oct 2011 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number Date Country
6269818 Sep 1994 JP
2004314174 Nov 2004 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
CVC 4-HS-Kaltwalzanlage ARBED fuer hochwertiges Stahlband, SMS, Germany.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20110154877 A1 Jun 2011 US