The present invention relates in general to surgical devices and procedures, and more particularly to wound protectors and wound retractors.
Surgical procedures are often used to treat and cure a wide range of diseases, conditions, and injuries. Many surgical procedures require access to internal tissue through open surgical procedures or endoscopic surgical procedures. The term “endoscopic” refers to all types of minimally invasive surgical procedures including laparoscopic and arthroscopic procedures. Endoscopic surgery has numerous advantages compared to traditional open surgical procedures, including reduced trauma, faster recovery, reduced risk of infection, and reduced scarring. Endoscopic surgery is often performed with an insufflatory fluid present within the body cavity, such as carbon dioxide or saline, to provide adequate space to perform the intended surgical procedures. The insufflated cavity is generally under pressure and is sometimes referred to as being in a state of pneumoperitoneum. Trocars are often used to provide a port through which endoscopic surgical instruments are passed. Trocars generally have a sealing valve that prevent the insufflatory fluid from escaping while an instrument is positioned in the trocar. Sometimes hand access devices are also used during endoscopic surgery, often referred to as hand assisted laparoscopic surgery (“HALS”). A HALS device will typically seal around a surgeon's hand or arm to prevent the insufflatory fluid from escaping while allowing the surgeon to manipulate tissue within the patient's body.
While wound protectors and wound retractors are known, no one has previously made or used a wound protector or wound retractor in accordance with the present invention.
While the specification concludes with claims which particularly point out and distinctly claim the invention, it is believed the invention will be better understood from the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings illustrating some non-limiting examples of the invention. Unless otherwise indicated, the figures are drawn to scale and like reference numerals identify the same elements.
In this embodiment the distal ring (10) is circular with a circular cross-sectional geometry; however, non-circular rings and non-circular cross-sectional geometries are also possible. For instance, the distal ring could have a oval or elliptical in cross-sectional shape. The distal ring (10) can be made from a variety of different materials with different characteristics. In this example the distal ring is made from an elastomer such as polyurethane, polyethylene, silicone, and the like. The distal ring can also vary in size. For instance, the distal ring can have an inside diameter greater than 1 inches and less than 9 inches, and a thickness less than 1 inch, but dimensions outside these ranges are also possible. Optionally, the distal ring (10) will have a durometer between 40 A and 90 A or 70 D, but other material properties are also possible.
In this embodiment the sleeve (20) is a single layered tube of material; however, a discontinuous sleeve or multi-layered sleeves are also possible. The sleeve (20) can be made from a variety of variety of different materials with different characteristics. In one example, the sleeve (20) is made from an elastomer such as polyisoprene, silicone, polyurethane, silicone, and the like; however, inelastic materials such as mylar could also be used. The sleeve (20) may be clear, transparent, translucent, or opaque. As shown here, the sleeve (20) is fastened at its ends directly to the proximal and distal rings using an adhesive or heat sealing techniques; however, alternative techniques may also be employed. The sleeve (20) could also be attached to the rings at locations other than the sleeve ends. For instance, the sleeve (20) can wrapped around the distal ring (10) and adhesively attached or sealed to itself. The length of the sleeve (20) can also vary. For instance, the sleeve may be between 2 cm and 20 cm in length; however, other lengths are also possible. The thickness of the sleeve (20) can also vary. For instance, the sleeve thickness in this embodiment is between 0.010 and 0.020 inches; however, other thicknesses are also possible.
In this embodiment the proximal ring (30) is circular; however, non-circular rings are also possible. The proximal ring (30) can also vary in size. For instance, the proximal ring (30) can have an inside diameter between 1 and 9 inches, but other dimensions are also possible. Optionally, the ratio of the distal ring (10) and proximal ring (30) diameters is greater than 0.4. The proximal ring (30) in this example has a generally s-shaped cross-sectional geometry with a height greater than the width. In this embodiment, the cross-sectional geometry is substantially constant around the circumference of the proximal ring (30). A geometry is substantially constant if any variations are insignificant. For example, geometric variations resulting only from molding or other manufacturing factors would be considered substantially constant. Also in this embodiment the cross-sectional geometry is substantially solid; however, holes or cavities may also be present.
In this example the proximal ring (30) rolls in resting increments of 180 degrees. In other words, when the ring rolls it “snaps” between resting positions. Optionally, the flip force for the proximal ring (30) can be less 10 in*lbs/180 degrees of rotation, and can be less than 3 in*lbs. Flip force is a way of measuring the force required to roll the ring about itself. The flip force is measured at room temperature on a stand-alone proximal ring without the sleeve attached. An equal and opposite torque is applied simultaneously to a ring at two diametrically opposite points along the circumference of the ring. The peak measured torque to roll the ring is used to calculate the flip force. By compiling 100 peak measured torques for a given ring, the statistical median value is the flip force. Preferably, the flip force is substantially the same for each sequential resting incremental rotation. Optionally, the proximal ring (30) may have substantially no residual hoop stress. One way to achieve this is through a molding process where the proximal ring (30) is injection molded and transfer molded using a thermoplastic or thermoset elastomer such as polyisoprene, silicone, polyurethane, silicone, and the like. In one embodiment, the proximal ring is molded from Desmopan 9370. The proximal ring (30) may have a durometer between 50 A and 50 D, but other material properties are also possible.
The surfaces are substantially constant about the circumference of the proximal ring (30). In the present embodiment the various surfaces transition smoothly, but geometric abrupt transitions are also possible. The medial surface includes a concave arcuate recess (31) that transitions to a convex arcuate expansion (32). The expansion (32) transitions to proximal surface (33), shown here as a flat normal the longitudinal axis (54). The proximal surface (33) transitions to a lateral surface comprising a convex arcuate expansion (34), which transitions to a concave arcuate recess (35), then to a convex arcuate expansion (36), then to a distal surface (37), shown here as a flat normal the longitudinal axis (54). The distal surface (37) transitions to the medial convex arcuate expansion (38), which then transitions to the concave arcuate recess (31). In this embodiment the recesses (31, 35) are longitudinally staggered to each other, the medial recess (31) being proximal the lateral recess (35).
Preferably, the wound protectors described above will be processed before surgery. First, a new or used wound protector is obtained and if necessary cleaned. The wound protector can then be sterilized. In one sterilization technique the wound protector is placed in a closed and sealed container, such as a plastic or TYVEK bag. Optionally, the wound protector can be bundled in the container as a kit with other components, including one or more of the following: a sealing cap to maintain pneumoperitoneum, a sealing cap with a valve to allow passage of surgical instruments or a surgeon's arm while maintaining pneumoperitoneum (e.g., iris valve, gel seal, cuff, and the like), a tube of lubricant, a mounting ring in which the proximal ring may be seated and to which a cap can be attached, a marker, an incision template or scale, an instruction sheet, and the like. The container and wound protector, as well as any other components, are then placed in a field of radiation that can penetrate the container, such as gamma radiation, x-rays, or high-energy electrons. The radiation kills bacteria on the wound protector and in the container. The sterilized wound protector can then be stored in the sterile container. The sealed container keeps the wound protector sterile until it is opened in the medical facility.
The wound protectors described above can be used as a stand-alone device, for instance in open surgical procedures, or in combination with a cap having sealing valve for endoscopic instruments or a surgeon's arm. Among other advantages, the foregoing examples provide effective wound protection to prevent infection and facilitate wound retraction. Because the sleeve rolls-up, its length can be adjusted by the surgeon for any given anatomy and patient. Further, the surgeon can select the amount of retraction desired for a given procedure. The cross-sectional shapes of the proximal ring are easy to grip thus facilitating ease of use. Furthermore, the flip forces are relatively low and constant, further facilitating ease of use.
Having shown and described various embodiments and examples of the present invention, further adaptations of the methods and devices described herein can be accomplished by appropriate modifications by one of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope of the present invention. Several of such potential modifications have been mentioned, and others will be apparent to those skilled in the art. For instance, the specific materials, dimensions, and the scale of drawings will be understood to be non-limiting examples. Accordingly, the scope of the present invention should be considered in terms of the following claims and is understood not to be limited to the details of structure, materials, or acts shown and described in the specification and drawings.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 563645 | Bitting | Jul 1896 | A |
| 2739587 | Scholl | Mar 1956 | A |
| 3111943 | Orndorff | Nov 1963 | A |
| 3332417 | Blanford et al. | Jul 1967 | A |
| 3347226 | Harrower | Oct 1967 | A |
| 3347227 | Harrower | Oct 1967 | A |
| 3397692 | Creager, Jr. et al. | Aug 1968 | A |
| 4881939 | Newman | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4995381 | Marmar et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5292330 | Shutt | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5324268 | Yoon | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5337754 | Heaven et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5366478 | Brinkerhoff et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5437683 | Neumann et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5441707 | Lewis et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5460170 | Hammerslag | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5480410 | Cuschieri et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5514133 | Golub et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5522791 | Leyva | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5524644 | Crook | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5526536 | Cartmill | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5545179 | Williamson, IV | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5640977 | Leahy et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5649550 | Crook | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5653705 | De La Torre et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5653717 | Ko et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5672168 | De La Torre et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5741298 | MacLeod | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5803921 | Bonadio | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5810721 | Mueller et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5813409 | Leahy et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5853395 | Crook et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5899208 | Bonadio | May 1999 | A |
| 5906577 | Beane et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5925064 | Meyers et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5947922 | MacLeod | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5957913 | De La Torre et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 6024736 | De La Torre et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6033426 | Kaji | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6033428 | Sardella | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6048309 | Flom et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6110154 | Shimomura et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6142935 | Flom et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6142936 | Beane et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6149642 | Gerhart et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6158437 | Vagley | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6159200 | Verdura et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6165184 | Verdura et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6228022 | Friesem et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6254534 | Butler et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6312258 | Ashman | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6315770 | De La Torre et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6319246 | De La Torre et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6382211 | Crook | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6440063 | Beane et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6450983 | Rambo | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6485467 | Crook et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6578577 | Bonadio et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6582364 | Butler et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6589167 | Shimomura et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6613952 | Rambo | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6623426 | Bonadio et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6676706 | Mears et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6723044 | Pulford et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6814078 | Crook | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6814700 | Mueller et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6846287 | Bonadio et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 20010037053 | Bonadio et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010047188 | Bonadio et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20020002324 | McManus | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020010389 | Butler et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020038077 | De La Torre et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020068923 | Caldwell et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020072762 | Bonadio et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020162559 | Crook | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020183594 | Beane et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030062051 | Rambo | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030078478 | Bonadio et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030187376 | Rambo | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030192553 | Rambo | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20040015185 | Ewers et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040049099 | Ewers et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040049100 | Butler et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040073090 | Butler et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040092795 | Bonadio et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040092796 | Butler et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040097793 | Butler et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040127772 | Ewers et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040154624 | Bonadio et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040249248 | Bonadio et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040254426 | Wenchell | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040260153 | Pulford et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040267096 | Caldwell et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050020884 | Hart et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050241647 | Nguyen et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0887047 | Dec 1998 | EP |
| 0887048 | Dec 1998 | EP |
| 0888755 | Jan 1999 | EP |
| 0776180 | Jan 2000 | EP |
| 1000583 | May 2003 | EP |
| 1312318 | May 2003 | EP |
| 0845960 | Apr 2004 | EP |
| 1415610 | May 2004 | EP |
| 1415610 | May 2004 | EP |
| 1442710 | Aug 2004 | EP |
| 1135070 | Sep 2004 | EP |
| WO 9311811 | Jun 1993 | WO |
| WO 9522289 | Aug 1995 | WO |
| WO 9524864 | Sep 1995 | WO |
| WO 9527468 | Oct 1995 | WO |
| WO 9610963 | Apr 1996 | WO |
| WO 9707742 | Mar 1997 | WO |
| WO 9848724 | Nov 1998 | WO |
| WO 9903416 | Jan 1999 | WO |
| WO 9925268 | May 1999 | WO |
| WO 0024326 | May 2000 | WO |
| WO 0032116 | Jun 2000 | WO |
| WO 0032117 | Jun 2000 | WO |
| WO 0032120 | Jun 2000 | WO |
| WO 0054676 | Sep 2000 | WO |
| WO 0054677 | Sep 2000 | WO |
| WO 0108581 | Feb 2001 | WO |
| WO 0126558 | Apr 2001 | WO |
| WO 0234108 | May 2002 | WO |
| WO 03028523 | Apr 2003 | WO |
| WO 03077726 | Sep 2003 | WO |
| WO 03103548 | Dec 2003 | WO |
| WO 2004026153 | Apr 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004030547 | Apr 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004054456 | Jul 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004075730 | Sep 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004075741 | Sep 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004096012 | Nov 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004103161 | Dec 2004 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20080021359 A1 | Jan 2008 | US |