Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to roll-up/down (or “roll-type”) shutters for storm, hurricane and security protection, and more particularly to corrugated shutter slats for storm shutters.
2. Description of Related Art
Roll-up/down storm shutters are well known and afford a great deal of window and interior protection from storms, hurricanes and from breaking and entering into a home or building through otherwise unprotected windows and doors. These roll-type shutters are formed of a plurality of interlocking horizontally extending slats which have limited pivotal motion therebetween and are typically arcuately configured in cross section to facilitate the roll-up storage of the storm shutters when not in use.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,263,943 to Lai teaches a modular rolling shutter comprised of vertically alternating rows of buckles and slats. Each slat is linked with the lower and upper buckles, allowing limited movement of the slats and buckles so that the modular shutter may be rolled and unrolled along tracks. The slats may be made of a transparent material allowing visibility without sacrificing weather resistance or security. U.S. Pat. No. 6,041,847 also to Lai discloses a building block for a rolling shutter made of plastic sheets.
A rolling door construction which is easily assembled and which includes a plurality of light-transmitting panels is taught in U.S. Pat. No. 4,332,287 to Stolpe. Snarli teaches a rollable or foldable shutter device for protecting, closing off or partitioning of areas, such as window areas in U.S. Pat. No. 5,456,305. The shutter is provided with panels made from a transparent material, such as polycarbonate, and hinges which are mounted so that it can be folded or rolled up. The hinges and the panels may be made in one piece. When the device is used, at least a part of the transparency remains.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,345,635 to Solomon discloses a rolling protective gate for store fronts or the like which is formed of a series of horizontally-extending transparent slats interconnected and articulated by a series of horizontally-extending metal rods. The transparent slats and metal rods are elongated, and each extends the full width of the building front access opening in which the rolling gate is mounted.
In U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2007/0175117, Brown teaches a storm shutter look out portal for storm shutters comprised of an assembly with an interior frame and an exterior frame enclosing at least one transparent panel in between, and also including a cover associated with the interior frame that is moveable from a closed position to an open position where the cover, the interior frame and the exterior frame, are all fabricated from materials that are resistant to the impacts anticipated during a hurricane or tropical storm.
Expired U.S. Pat. No. 4,690,193 to Morrison et al. discloses a rolling shutter characterized by an array of edge-adjacent, parallel shutter slats and full shutter width, clear shutter segments or links articulately interconnecting respective pairs of adjacent shutter slats. When spaced apart, the slats form therebetween a gap which exposes the clear link which permits passage of light over substantially the full extent of the gap. The clear links also provide a double hinge-like joint between adjacent slats.
Goldhaber teaches a protective enclosure for building openings such as windows and doorways wherein the protective enclosure comprises a peripheral frame member that circumscribes the openings and pivotally mounts a transparent shielding unit in U.S. Pat. No. 4,175,357.
A shutter with profiled strips made of transparent plastic is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,126,173 to Theuerkauff. U.S. Pat. No. 5,507,335 to Yu teaches a shutter with a plurality of slat units which have transparent portions through which an object behind the same can be viewed.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,234,033 to Leivenzon et al. discloses a corrugated roller door and frame combination. Wells teaches a roll-up door assembly including a corrugated flexible sheet closure member in U.S. Pat. No. 6,064,525. A roller shutter door is taught in U.S. Pat. No. 4,433,714 to Barber.
Biggers discloses shutter systems for windows and doors which have pronounced corrugations when deployed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,148,895, U.S. Pat. No. 6,755,231 and U.S. Pat. No. 7,121,316. Roll-up door systems are taught by Finch et al. in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,172,744 and 5,284,199.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,811,777 to Chretien discloses a device for at least partially closing a vertical opening in a building. A rolling shutter system is taught by Miller In U.S. Pat. No. 5,575,322.
Recent building code restrictions have dramatically increased impact strength requirements for doors and windows and devices intended to afford protection from storm and hurricane damage due to wind-driven flying objects. Current hurricane protection must now be stringently tested and qualified for production and code acceptance under test conditions not imagined two decades ago. As a result, not only have the overall impact strength requirements been increased, but the uniqueness of the testing requirements are forcing development of specialized hurricane protection structure to, at least in part, meet specific code testing requirements. The present invention provides both preferably corrugated, as well as flattened and doubled roll-up type storm shutter slats which greatly increase the ability of these storm shutters in meeting these new hurricane testing codes by affording a substantially greater resistance to flying object impact when that flying object strikes directly against the center of one of the slats rather than impacting against a stronger knuckle hinge area between shutter slats.
The foregoing examples of the related art and limitations related therewith are intended to be illustrative and not exclusive. Other limitations of the related art will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon a reading of the specification and a study of the drawings.
This invention is directed to a roll-up type storm shutter including a plurality of elongated horizontally extending preferably corrugated shutter slats held together in an edge-to-edge vertical arrangement. Each of the storm slats has first and second edges configured to slidably and interlockingly engage with a next adjacent slat for limited pivotal movement therebetween to facilitate rolled vertical deployment and retraction of the storm shutter. A central portion between the edges of each slat preferably has lengthwise extending corrugations for greater impact resistance to better withstand the impact of airborne flying objects produced during storms and hurricanes. An elongated solid panel may be added to each slat, each panel having enlarged parallel edge portions configured and spaced apart for dependent lengthwise slidable engagement between inwardly facing grooves formed proximate to the edges of each of the slats. Each of the panels is coextensive with and preferably contacting outwardly facing corrugation peaks to further enhance the impact resistance of the storm shutter. Moreover, each panel may be formed being sun and heat reflective for reducing heat buildup within the building.
It is therefore an object of this invention to provide a corrugated shutter slat for storm shutters which substantially increases flying object impact resistance.
Still another object of this invention is to provide a corrugated shutter slat for storm shutters which includes an easily assemblable two-part structure including a separate panel which slidably engages into mating groove structure of the corrugated slat for still further resistance to storm and hurricane airborne objects' impact damage, and, when the panels are heat and sun reflective, will reduce heat buildup in the building.
The following embodiments and aspects thereof are described and illustrated in conjunction with systems, tools and methods which are meant to be exemplary and illustrative and not limiting in scope. In various embodiments one or more of the above-described problems have been reduced or eliminated while other embodiments are directed to other improvements. In addition to the exemplary aspects and embodiments described above, further aspects and embodiments will become apparent by reference to the drawings and by study of the following descriptions.
Exemplary embodiments are illustrated in reference figures of the drawings. It is intended that the embodiments and figures disclosed herein are to be considered to be illustrative rather than limiting.
Referring now to the drawings, and firstly to
Each shutter slat 20 is preferably formed of extruded aluminum material having a uniform cross-section and vertically spaced edges 24 and 26. Edge 26 defines a channel while edge 24 defines a hook structure which slidably, matably engage and connect together as shown best in
The important aspect of the present invention resides in providing greater resistance to impacts imposed upon the storm shutter 18, and each of the individual shutter slats 20, by airborne objects during heavy storms and hurricanes. These flying objects, moving in the direction of arrow B against the outside of the storm shutter 18, may impact against the outer surfaces of the shutter slats 20 with great force at velocities exceeding 100 mph. Moreover, building test codes have been developed to simulate impacts of maximum or even greater or exaggerated severity to replicate hurricane force wind conditions. For example, as seen in
However, the embodiment 20 of a corrugated hurricane slat substantially increases the ability of the storm shutter 18 to survive a direct flying object impact in the direction of arrow B. These storm slats 20 include a plurality of generally evenly spaced corrugations or waves 22 formed having peaks and valleys (as shown) which greatly increase the resistivity of the storm shutter 18 to airborne flying object impact and potential bending-to-fracture impact forces. Moreover, the overall contour of these corrugations 22 is also preferably very gently arcuate, e.g., outwardly concaved at radius R in
Note that the longitudinal facing channels 28 and 30 which are typically utilized for attachment of end fittings by threaded fasteners or for the end-to-end attachment of storm slats for excessively wide installations, the necessary slats or openings 34 and 36 formed during the extrusion process, are outwardly facing and are exposed to wind or flying debris in the direction of arrow B against the outer surface of each of the storm slats 20. However, in
Referring now to
The longitudinally extending cavities 52 and 54, however, are sized and positioned to receive the enlarged or beaded edges 62 and 66 of a separate protective panel 44. This panel 44 is extruded of a wide range of extrudable metal, plastic or vinyl material having a solid arcuate central panel 60 which, in combination with the corrugations 46 of the storm slat 42, achieves an increased level of protection against flying object impact damage and penetration into the interior of the building therethrough. The enlarged edges 62 and 66 are offset at 64 and 68 so as to slidable engage lengthwise into the elongated cavities 52 and 54 as best seen in
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring lastly to
While a number of exemplary aspects and embodiments have been discussed above, those of skill in the art will recognize certain modifications, permeations and additions and subcombinations thereof. It is therefore intended that the following appended claims and claims hereinafter introduced are interpreted to include all such modifications, permeations, additions and subcombinations that are within their true spirit and scope.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
682304 | Wilson | Sep 1901 | A |
746307 | Ebner | Dec 1903 | A |
876593 | Rush | Jan 1908 | A |
1367240 | Cornell | Feb 1921 | A |
1406303 | Tomkinson | Feb 1922 | A |
1437947 | Probert | Dec 1922 | A |
1579839 | Raper | Apr 1926 | A |
1579915 | Cornell | Apr 1926 | A |
1632219 | Deller | Jun 1927 | A |
2093054 | Bruno | Sep 1937 | A |
2350287 | Michelman | May 1944 | A |
2585627 | Cornell et al. | Feb 1952 | A |
2638162 | Heitlinger et al. | May 1953 | A |
2770298 | Hiatt | Nov 1956 | A |
2835935 | Housley | May 1958 | A |
3053318 | Artman | Sep 1962 | A |
3481388 | Smart | Dec 1969 | A |
3642050 | Piana | Feb 1972 | A |
4126173 | Theuerkauff | Nov 1978 | A |
4175357 | Goldhaber | Nov 1979 | A |
4182144 | Leivenzon et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4234033 | Leivenzon et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4332287 | Stolpe | Jun 1982 | A |
4343340 | Paule | Aug 1982 | A |
4345635 | Solomon | Aug 1982 | A |
4382460 | Ben-Tal | May 1983 | A |
4433711 | Lew | Feb 1984 | A |
4433714 | Barber | Feb 1984 | A |
4601953 | Haffer | Jul 1986 | A |
4628982 | Labelle | Dec 1986 | A |
4630664 | Magro | Dec 1986 | A |
4690193 | Morrison et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4809760 | Lew | Mar 1989 | A |
4811777 | Chretien | Mar 1989 | A |
4913216 | Lemay | Apr 1990 | A |
5172744 | Finch et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5209282 | Franco et al. | May 1993 | A |
5284199 | Finch et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5301735 | Chen | Apr 1994 | A |
5322108 | Hoffman | Jun 1994 | A |
5358024 | Schwaegerle | Oct 1994 | A |
5419386 | Magro et al. | May 1995 | A |
5456305 | Snarli | Oct 1995 | A |
5477903 | Figueiredo et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5507335 | Yu | Apr 1996 | A |
5515902 | Hoffman | May 1996 | A |
5549148 | Figueiredo et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5575322 | Miller | Nov 1996 | A |
5613539 | Kraler | Mar 1997 | A |
6041847 | Lai | Mar 2000 | A |
6064525 | Depauw | May 2000 | A |
6065525 | Wells | May 2000 | A |
6067911 | Marker et al. | May 2000 | A |
6148895 | Biggers | Nov 2000 | A |
6263943 | Lai | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6279641 | Malott | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6296039 | Mullet et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6341639 | Mullet et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6371189 | Azoulai | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6422289 | Miller | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6435101 | Marker et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6755231 | Biggers | Jun 2004 | B1 |
7121316 | Biggers | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7328613 | Volkel et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7357171 | Miller | Apr 2008 | B2 |
D601716 | Konrad et al. | Oct 2009 | S |
7784522 | Miller | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7900681 | Sweeney | Mar 2011 | B2 |
20030024659 | Begni | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030066249 | Walsh | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20050205222 | Miller | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050205223 | Miller | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060283563 | Volkel et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070056695 | Chang | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070137802 | Lukasik et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070175117 | Brown | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080202700 | Miller | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090266497 | Motosko et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100212842 | Bichler | Aug 2010 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition. S.v. “corrugated.” Retrieved Dec. 2, 2011 from http://www.thefreedictionary.com/corrugated. |
The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition. S.v. “zigzag.” Retrieved Dec. 2, 2011 from http://www.thefreedictionary.com/zigzag. |