This application has no related applications.
The inventions described and claimed in this application were not made under federally sponsored research and development.
This invention relates to a tee ball stand with a rolled ball holder. More specifically, this invention relates to a tee ball stand with a resiliently collapsible, frusto-conically shaped ball holder.
Tee ball stands are characteristically used in the process of teaching young children to hit a ball with a bat. The typical tee ball stand comprises a ground engaging base which supports an adjustable vertical pole having a ball support cup on the upper end. A ball is placed on the support cup so a youngster can then strike at the stationary ball by swinging a bat instead of the more difficult task of attempting to hit a moving ball. With limited experience or limited coordination, the youngster may occasionally strike the cup or pole holding the ball, rather than the ball itself. This can be expected as part of the learning process. As a result, however, the tee ball stand is frequently tipped over or moved and has to be repositioned for the training session to continue. This can be a source of frustration and discouragement, as well as a safety concern, for the youngster and coach in the event of inadvertent contact with errant bat swings.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,227,691, 4,709,924, 4,819,937, 4,962,924, 5,004,234, 5,916,045, 6,099,418 and 6,884,185, as well as others, are characteristic of various tee ball practice devices having a base plate that rests flat on the ground to support some type of ball holding apparatus.
The ball support cup for most tee ball stands are of a molded construction and are somewhat rigid. This results in movement or tipping of the tee ball stand if the cup is struck by an errant blow of the bat. Accordingly, there have been prior art support cups proposed to more readily yield to a side force. One such solution is a ball holder as shown by Tanner in U.S. Pat. No. 6,358,163 formed of flexible sheeting rolled into a frusto-conical shape.
Tanner subsequently acknowledges, in his U.S. Pat. No. 6,682,445, that the ball holder of his earlier patent did not hold well during use and was subject to tearing. In the '445 patent, Tanner claims to have improved the ball holder of the '163 patent by eliminating the lacing required to hold the sheeting material in the frusto-conical strip and by wrapping the lower end of the sheeting material with an elastic wrap. In use, however, this construction has not been reliable. Although tears and ripping of the sheeting material is less common, failure of the material to retain its shape and to remain functionally assembled atop the upright pole have been problems. Indeed, in the '445 patent, Tanner suggests repair of the sheeting material 90 with pieces cut from truck tires and use of a bicycle inner tube for the elastic wrap 95.
Accordingly, a need remains in the field of sports for a tee ball stand with a resiliently flexible ball holder that can repeatedly return to a frusto-conical shape after be struck with a baseball bat. The primary objective of this invention is to meet these needs.
More specifically, an object of the invention is to provide a tee ball stand with a resiliently flexible, frusto-conically shaped ball holder which is sufficiently rigid to support a baseball in an upright position when not subjected to a side impact force but is also sufficiently flexible to readily deform from its frusto-conical shape when subjected to a side impact force and then return to its original frusto-conical shape.
Another object of the invention is to provide a tee ball stand of the character described and being extremely rugged and durable construction.
An additional object of the invention is to provide a tee ball stand of the character described having a frusto-conically shaped ball holder formed from flexible sheeting wrapped around a uniquely contoured base fitting which retains the sheeting in its original frusto-conical shape even after repeated blows of a baseball bat.
A further object of the invention is to provide a ball holder of the character described wherein the sheeting material is locked onto the base fitting to precisely maintain a frusto-conical shape.
In summary, an object of the invention is to provide a tee ball stand with a ground engaging base, a perpendicular stanchion connected to the base, and a resiliently flexible ball holder mounted atop the stanchion. The ball holder is formed from sheeting material rolled into a frusto-conical shape and maintained in such shape on a tapered base fitting. The base fitting includes a longitudinal abutment edge to align the longitudinal edge of the sheeting material with respect to the base and radially projecting pegs which register with holes in the lower skirt of the sheeting material in order to maintain the sheeting material in the proper frusto-conical shape and to prevent separation from the base.
Other and further objects of the invention, together with the features of novelty appurtenant thereto, will appear in the course of the detailed description of the drawings.
In the following description of the drawings, in which like reference numerals are employed to indicate like parts in the various views:
Referring to the invention in greater detail, attention is first directed to
As those skilled in this art will appreciate, the stanchion 20 may be of a fixed or adjustably telescoping construction, and is preferably flexible. The base 24 likewise may have a variety of configurations, such as the X-frame as shown in
Mounted atop the stanchion 20 is a ball holder, generally designated by the numeral 26. Further details of the ball holder 26 are illustrated in the remaining figures of the drawings.
The ball holder 26 comprises a base fitting 28 and a frusto-conically shaped skirt 30 secured at the lower end thereof to the base fitting 28. The frusto-conically shaped skirt 30 is formed by rolling a piece of resiliently flexible sheeting material 32 as seen in
The sheeting material 32 may be rubber, silicon, or other flexible synthetic. It has a thickness preferably in the range of 1 to 3 millimeters. Approximately 2 laps of the sheeting material 32 are typically required to form the frusto-conical skirt 30 if the material thickness falls in the lower portion of the preferred range, but less than 2 laps of material can be used with thicker material. If less than 2 complete laps of material are employed, then it is important that the sides of the sheeting material 32 at least overlap one another throughout the height of the frusto-conical skirt 30.
The base fitting 28, as shown in detail in FIGS. 6 & 8-11, has a uniquely contoured exterior. As seen in
The lower portion of the base fitting 28 has a downwardly sloping taper with gripping ridges 36 molded therein. The upper portion of the base fitting 28 has an upwardly sloping taper which, as will be seen, corresponds identically to the taper of the frusto-conical skirt 30. As shown in
As shown in
With the sheeting material 32 wrapped around the base fitting 28 as described, a compression sleeve 46 may be slipped over the assembled base fitting 28 and lower end of the frusto-conical skirt 30 from below to encircle the base fitting 28 and engage the gripping ridges 38. Alternatively, the lower end of the sheeting material 32 can be glued or taped in order to retain the frusto-conical shape. It is important the upper section of the skirt 30 not be glued or taped, however, which would otherwise impair its flexibility and resiliency.
Assembled and constructed in the manner as described, rigid portion of the ball holder 26 as represented by the base fitting 28 and the lower section of the frusto-conical skirt 30 wrapped around the base fitting 28 comprises only about 15% to 25% of the overall height of the ball holder 26. Moreover, the frusto-conical skirt tapers from a smaller diameter at said lower end wrapped around the base fitting 28 to a larger diameter at the top which is 2 to 3 times greater than the smaller diameter. Accordingly, the greater portion of the ball holder 26 therefore comprises the upper section of the frusto-conical skirt 30 having sufficient stiffness to create a stable support for a baseball placed on top but still sideways flexible. The ball holder 26 constructed in the foregoing manner has very little influence on a properly struck ball. However, in the event the ball holder 26 is contacted by an errant swing of the bat, frusto-conical skirt 30 readily deflects and then returns to its original shape.
Even after repeated blows from a baseball bat, the ball holder 26 durably retains its usefulness and functionality and the frusto-conical skirt 30 maintains its proper shape and attachment to the base fitting 28 as a result of the interlocking engagement previously described.
From the foregoing it will be seen that this invention is one well adapted to attain all the ends and objects hereinabove set forth, together with the other advantages which are obvious and which are inherent to the invention.
It will be understood that certain features and subcombinations are of utility and may be employed without reference to other features and subcombinations. This is contemplated by and is within the scope of the claims.
Since many possible embodiments may be made of the invention without departing from the scope thereof, it is understood that all matter herein set forth or shown in the accompanying drawings is to be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4227691 | Lefebvre et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4383686 | Cardieri | May 1983 | A |
4445685 | Cardieri | May 1984 | A |
4664374 | Groves | May 1987 | A |
4709924 | Wilson et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4819937 | Gordon | Apr 1989 | A |
4886267 | Licciardi et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4962924 | James | Oct 1990 | A |
5004234 | Hollis | Apr 1991 | A |
5388823 | Prieto | Feb 1995 | A |
D373806 | Bunnell | Sep 1996 | S |
5897444 | Hellyer | Apr 1999 | A |
D410052 | Davis et al. | May 1999 | S |
5916045 | Busch | Jun 1999 | A |
6099418 | Owen | Aug 2000 | A |
6238307 | Owen | May 2001 | B1 |
6358163 | Tanner | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6413175 | Mooney, Jr. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6682445 | Tanner | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6884185 | Udwin et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
D514638 | deGrasse | Feb 2006 | S |
7063632 | Green | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7479074 | Pierce | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7641573 | Cech | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7744496 | Chisena | Jun 2010 | B2 |
D633583 | Guevara | Mar 2011 | S |
8734274 | Hochberg | May 2014 | B1 |
20030036446 | Udwin et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20060019773 | Newman | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20110183781 | Chiu | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120172153 | Newman | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130178313 | Meier et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20140295999 | Robinson | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140364255 | Nelson et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |