This application is the U.S. national stage application of International Application PCT/BR2019/050114, filed Mar. 29, 2019, which international application was published on Oct. 3, 2019, as International Publication WO 2019/183705 A1 in the English language. The International Application claims priority of Brazilian Patent Application No. BR 10 2018 006507 6 filed Mar. 29, 2018.
The present invention relates to a construction applied to a roller assembly mounted on each one of the supports of a conveyor belt of bulk material for providing spaced rotating supports along the length of the conveyor belt by a determined distance to optimize the number of roller and support assemblies without causing an undue increase of the power required to move the belt as a result of internal frictions of the bulk material, deformation of the belt in contact with the rollers of each support and also frictions to rotate each roller.
The roller assemblies of the type shown in
It is well known to those skilled in the art that the power required for the driving in linear displacement of a conveyor belt can be quite high, even when said conveyor belt is arranged in a horizontal path.
A second factor for defining the required power to move the conveyor belt CT is the deformation of the latter when, in moving under load, contacts a roller, particularly the central roller 40, as illustrated in
A third factor for determining the power required for the movement of the conveyor belt CT is defined by the friction for rotating a roller. This friction is proportional to the load on the belt and also to the diameter of the roller bearing and of the shaft of the roller. The larger the roller shaft diameter, the greater will be the friction. Since the diameter of the shaft and of the roller bearings is defined as a function of the load applied on them, the reduction of said load allows the use of rollers with shafts and roller bearings of smaller diameter and, therefore, with less rotation friction.
A well-known solution for reducing the factors of the increase of the required power is that one shown in
In this second known constructive arrangement, the two side rollers 30 and the frame 20, which carries the two central rollers 40, are rotatably mounted on rigid supports which are defined by the end columns 11 and the median columns 12, allowing the reduction of the factors related to the required power to move the conveyor belt CT.
The use of the two central rollers 40 allows for a substantial reduction of the distance W between the confronting center rollers of each two consecutive assemblies by decreasing the undulating movement of the conveyor belt CT and, thus, the friction power losses between the particles of the bulk material being conveyed.
The mounting of the two central rollers 40 in the frame 20 enables to reduce by half the contact pressure between the conveyor belt CT and the leading central roller on each support S, by reducing, in a more than proportional way, the resistance produced by the contact of the belt against the leading central roller 40.
In addition, the duplicity of central rollers 40 enables a substantial reduction of the load of the bulk material M on said central rollers and, consequently, the diameter of the shaft and of the roller bearings, by reducing the rolling resistance of the rollers.
The positive effects of this second mounting arrangement, with two central rollers 40 in the rocker frame 20, are schematically illustrated in
Despite the aforementioned advantages related to the roller assemblies on each support S, comprising two side rollers 30 and two central roller 40, in a rocker arrangement, said known construction requires dimensional accuracy in the construction and mounting of the support S and requires the stop of the conveyor belt CT for the replacement of one or more side rollers 30 or central rollers of each assembly in the respective support S, which constitutes in a very relevant negative aspect in long systems for handling bulk material.
Due to the drawbacks of the known roller assemblies for a conveyor belt, with regard to the dimensional and mounting accuracy of the supports and also the difficulty of maintaining the rollers with the belt in operation, the present invention aims to provide a roller assembly defined by two inclined side rollers and two central rollers and which can be easily assembled and disassembled from a respective structural support with the conveyor belt in operative movement under load, without requiring dimensional accuracy in the construction and mounting of the support and providing the advantages of reducing the factors which define the power required for moving the belt.
According to the invention, the roller assembly is arranged transversely to the displacement direction of the conveyor belt and comprises two inclined side rollers and two central rollers, horizontal and parallel to each other, each of the side and central rollers being mounted rotatably free around a respective shaft, the shaft of each side roller having an upper end which is hinged to a respective support portion arranged on one side of the conveyor belt, and a lower end, wherein the shaft of each central roller has opposite ends mounted on opposite sides of a rocker frame, each of the opposite sides of the frame having its median portion hinged at the lower end of the shaft of a respective side roller.
With the above construction, the roller assembly object of the present invention has the two central rollers mounted on a rocker frame, which is held horizontally suspended by its median hinge at the lower ends of the shafts of the two inclined side rollers, the upper end of the shaft of each of the side rollers being hinged to a respective support portion on a respective side of the conveyor belt.
In the present solution, the side rollers and the rocker frame, carrying the two central rollers, are arranged as a “chain” suspended between the two support portions, requiring substantially less dimensional and mounting accuracy than that which is required for the solutions in which the side rollers and the central rollers have the ends of their shafts directly mounted on a support arranged transversally to the belt.
In addition to the above advantage, the present solution enables the suspended roller assembly to be easily replaced, being then sufficient that the upper end of the shaft of each side roller is disengaged from its hinge to the respective support portion, even with the conveyor belt in movement.
The invention will be described below with reference to the accompanying drawings, given by way of example of possible embodiments for the roller assembly in question and in which:
As shown in the drawing figures and already mentioned above, the invention relates to a roller assembly arranged transversely to the displacement direction of a conveyor belt CT and comprising two inclined side rollers 30 and two central rollers 40, horizontal and parallel to each other, each of the side rollers 30 and central rollers 40 being mounted, rotatably free, around a side shaft 31 and central shaft 41, respectively.
According to the invention, the shaft 31 of each side roller 30 has an upper end 31a hinged to a respective support portion PS, arranged on one side of the conveyor belt CT, and a lower end 31b, which is held suspended, as described hereinafter, without being supported in the support S.
As shown in
The shaft 41 of each central roller 40 has opposite ends 41a and mounted on opposite sides 20a of a rocker frame 20, said opposite sides of the frame 20 being parallel to each other and to the linear displacement direction of the conveyor belt CT. Each one of the opposite sides 20a of the frame 20 has a median portion hinged, in a suspension way, in the lower end 31b of the shaft 31 of a respective side roller 30. Thus, the roller assembly remains suspended only by the hinge of the upper ends 31a of the shafts 31 of the side rollers 30 in respective support portions PS.
The frame 20 can be constructed in different manners, wherein the drawings illustrate only some of the possible embodiments, according to which each side of the frame 20 comprises a crossbar 21 having end portions 21a, opposite to each other and in each one is mounted one of the ends 41a of the shaft 41 of one of the central rollers 40.
In the illustrated exemplificative constructions, the end portions 21a of the crossbars 21 are each provided with an upper recess 21b in each one is engaged and retained one end 41a of the shaft 41 of one of the central rollers 40. This arrangement enables quick and simple assembly and disassembly operations of the central rollers 40 relative to the frame 20.
In
A variant constructive of the construction of frame 20 is illustrated in
In another embodiment for the frame 20, shown in
The hinge between the lower end 31b of the shaft 31 of each side roller 30 and the adjacent end 23a of the frame shaft 23 can be obtained by different ways such as, for example, by pivoting the confronting ends of said two shafts, at opposite ends of a short hinge arm 35.
In a similar manner, the hinge between the upper end 31a of the shaft 31 of each side roller 30 and the respective support portion PS can be made in different ways, as that one illustrated in
Although only a few embodiments have been illustrated for the roller assembly in question, it should be understood that several amendments can be made in the shape and in the physical layout of the component parts of the roller assembly without departing from the inventive concept defined in the claim set which accompanies this disclosure.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
BR 10 2018 006507 | Mar 2018 | BR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/BR2019/050114 | 3/29/2019 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2019/183705 | 10/3/2019 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3049219 | Arndt | Aug 1962 | A |
3194387 | Poundstone | Jul 1965 | A |
3219177 | Reilly | Nov 1965 | A |
3246736 | Lo Presti | Apr 1966 | A |
3880275 | Fischer et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
4043447 | Donnelly | Aug 1977 | A |
4134488 | Bigney | Jan 1979 | A |
4186831 | Mercurio | Feb 1980 | A |
5938005 | Stokman | Aug 1999 | A |
6193055 | Brink | Feb 2001 | B1 |
7886892 | Fourney | Feb 2011 | B2 |
20020046928 | Swinderman | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020050444 | Tapp | May 2002 | A1 |
20020063042 | Fischer | May 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19628470 | Jan 1998 | DE |
3380418 | Apr 2020 | EP |
2011255990 | Dec 2011 | JP |
630157 | Oct 1978 | SU |
800050 | Jan 1981 | SU |
WO-2013082642 | Jun 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/BR2019/050114 dated Jun. 26, 2019. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210009358 A1 | Jan 2021 | US |