The present disclosure is directed to a machine undercarriage and, more particularly, is directed to a roller system for a machine undercarriage.
Many machines, such as, for example, tractors, dozers, hydraulic excavators, mining machines, and other earth or material moving machines, include tracked undercarriages to facilitate movement of the machines over a ground surface, a tracked undercarriage may include a pair of track assemblies with one track assembly on each side of the machine. A track assembly may include a track frame on which is mounted a drive sprocket, one or more idlers, and guiding structure to drive and support an endless track. An endless track generally includes a series of interconnected track shoes with each track shoe including a ground engaging surface and a support surface for the rollers opposite the ground engaging surface. The length of each track shoe along the endless track from its connection to an adjacent track shoe on one end to its connection to an adjacent track shoe on the other end is typically referred to as a pitch.
A plurality of track rollers typically are mounted to the track frame and contact the support surface of track shoes along a lower, ground engaging run of the endless track. Track rollers may be symmetric relative to the width direction of the endless track and may include paired, side-by-side contact surfaces that engage the support surfaces of the track shoes along paired, side-by-side support surfaces. Load forces of the machine are transferred through the undercarriage, to the track frame, to the track rollers, to the track itself, and finally to the ground. The plurality of track rollers may be spaced close together along the support surfaces of the lower run of the endless track. Given space constraints and the necessary size of the rollers for adequate machine support, a typical machine may include between six and eight track rollers, for example, but also may include less than six or more than eight.
These rollers, while closely spaced, still have their axes of rotation spaced apart greater than one pitch of the endless track. The diameter and spacing of the rollers generally is such that the center-to-center spacing between track rollers averages about 1.6 times one pitch of the endless track (or the length of a track section, or the center-to-center spacing between track shoes). This results in a track platform that is only about 65% efficient. Track platform efficiency is defined as the total number of bottom rollers divided by the total number of shoes engaging the ground (between the first and last roller). A track platform efficiency that is too low causes track shoes to be stressed unevenly and not used productively for machine support since each track shoe is not simultaneously and uniformly engaged by a track roller, in addition, a track platform efficiency that is too low results in fewer lateral (or thrust) contact points between the rollers and track shoes. This diminishes track guiding, whereby the track can more easily leave the rollers (known as de-railing or de-tracking) during a machine turn or machine operation on uneven terrain. Track de-railing can result in significant damage to undercarriage components. A track platform efficiency that is too low creates additional problems in the undercarriage system. One of these problems is increased machine vibration caused by the undercarriage at higher travel speeds. This machine vibration is mostly a function of machine travel speed, stiffness of the ground, the space between rollers, and the pitch of the track. An additional problem with a track platform efficiency that is too low is the increased space between any two adjacent rollers which causes excessive shoe-to-shoe back bending between these rollers. When track shoes back bend excessively, high loads and corresponding stresses occur in the track joints and at the forward and aft edges of the shoes.
There exists a need to increase efficiency of the track platform, such that more roller contacts with the shoes will (1) improve vertical load distribution to the ground, (2) improve lateral track guiding capability, (3) lower track induced machine vibration at higher travel speeds, and (4) reduce shoe-to-shoe hack bending between any two adjacent rollers.
One type of roller system is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,422,696 issued to Seit on Dec. 27, 1983 (“the '696 patent”). The '696 patent discloses a track structure that purports to address wear and tear on the suspension system of a tracked vehicle with a roller system intended to avoid the vertical oscillations that occur as the rollers, or wheels, tend to drop as the track links pass the rollers. The links of the track chain of the '696 patent include gaps between the adjacent links having a spacing “x,” The track rollers are mounted on “bogie assemblies” and include roller pairs, side-by-side adjacent, wherein the two rollers of a pair are offset inter-axially by a spacing “X.” According to the '696 patent, the relationship between “x” and “X” should be 1x≦X≦1.5x. With this relationship, according to the '696 patent, the two rollers of each pair of rollers are offset sufficiently so that one of the two rollers always will rest upon the fiat surface of a tread link and avoid a drop of the rollers as the track links pass by.
While the system of the '696 patent may be useful for some applications, it may not be adequate to address track wear and heavy machine support issues. The '696 patent discloses a slightly offset roller arrangement specifically to address a problem associated with a gap between track links. This is generally not an issue with construction or mining machine track where little or no such gap exists between adjacent links or shoes. The '696 patent does not adequately address the issue of evenly and uniformly distributing machine weight among ground engaging track shoes so as to maximize productive use of the track shoes. In addition, the '696 patent does not address the issue of reduced track guiding capability when some shoes on the ground do not contact a roller. Also, the '696 patent does not address excessive shoe-to-shoe back bending and excessively high loads and uneven wear that may be imposed against the track shoes on uneven ground where excessive space can exist between any two adjacent rollers.
The roller system for machine undercarriage of the present disclosure solves one or more of the problems set forth above and/or other problems of the prior art.
In one aspect, the present disclosure is directed to a roller system for a tracked undercarriage. The roller system includes an interconnected track shoe series. The roller system also includes a first roller series configured to engage a first plurality of non.-adjacent track shoes of the track shoe series. The roller system also includes a second roller series configured to engage a second plurality of non-adjacent track shoes of the track shoe series. The rollers of the first roller series are independently mounted relative to rollers of the second roller series, and non-adjacent track shoes of the first plurality are between non-adjacent track shoes of the second plurality.
In another aspect, the present disclosure is directed to a track assembly including a track frame. The track assembly also includes a drive sprocket and at least one take-up idler mounted on the track frame. The track assembly also includes an endless track that includes an interconnected track shoe series with the endless track mounted on the track frame and engaged with the drive sprocket and the at least one take-up idler. The track assembly also includes a first roller series configured to simultaneously engage a first plurality of track shoes of the track shoe series, and a second roller series configured to simultaneously engage a second plurality of track shoes of the track shoe series, and wherein the first plurality of track shoes is different from the second plurality of track shoes.
In yet another aspect, the present disclosure is directed to a machine. The machine includes an upper body including a power source. The machine also includes an undercarriage supporting the upper body and including a plurality of track assemblies with each track assembly including a track frame. The machine also includes an endless track mounted on the track frame of each track assembly and including an interconnected track shoe series. Each track assembly of the machine includes a first roller series in a linear array wherein each roller is secured to the track frame for rotation about an axis, and a second roller series in a linear array parallel to the first roller series wherein each roller is secured to the track frame for rotation about an axis, wherein the first roller series is offset longitudinally of the track frame relative to the second roller series such that the axes of the rollers of the first roller series are between the axes of the rollers of the second roller series.
Undercarriage 12 may include a track assembly 22 on each side of machine 10, only one track assembly 22 being visible in
Each roller 44 of first roller series 40 may be spaced from an adjacent roller 44 such that the distance between the outside diameters of rollers 44 is less than the diameter of roller 44. Similarly, each roller 46 of the second roller series 42 may be spaced from an adjacent roller 46 such that the distance between the outside diameters of rollers 46 is less than the diameter of roller 46. The diameters of each of rollers 44 and rollers 46 may be substantially equal. As viewed in
Rollers 44 of first roller series 40 may engage with portions of rail surfaces 62 and 64 of alternate track shoes 50 of track shoe series 48. Rollers 46 of second roller series 42 may engage with portions of rail surfaces 62 and 64 of different, alternate track shoes 50 that are adjacent and between alternate track shoes engaged by rollers 44. Stated differently, first roller series 40 may be configured to engage with a first plurality of non-adjacent track shoes 50 of track shoe series 48, and second roller series 42 may be configured to engage with a second plurality of non-adjacent track shoes 50 of track shoe series 48, with the first plurality of track shoes 50 being different from the second plurality of track shoes 50. Accordingly, along the combined distance D of first and second roller series 40 and 42 of track roller system 36, each track shoe 50 of track shoe series 48 may be simultaneously engaged by a roller 44 or 46 of first or second roller series 40, 42.
As illustrated in
In
Roller 44a May engage with a first rail surface 62 and a guide surface 56 of track shoe 50a, roller 46 may engage with a second rail surface 64 and a guide surface 56 of track shoe 50b, and roller 44b may engage with a first rail surface 62 and a guide surface 56 of track shoe 50c. Accordingly, by extrapolation, adjacent rollers 44 of the first roller series 40 may be configured to engage first rail surfaces 62 and guide surfaces 56 of alternate, non-adjacent track shoes 50 of track shoe series 48, and adjacent rollers 46 of second roller series 42 may be configured to engage second rail surfaces 64 and guide surfaces 56 of track shoes 50 of track shoe series 48 that are between the alternate, non-adjacent track shoes 50.
As viewed in
The disclosed track roller system may be employed in any track-type machine and may provide a number of advantages over conventional track roller systems. Conventional track roller systems typically include a symmetric track roller arrangement wherein each roller may include paired, side-by-side roller surfaces. The diameter of the rollers and the pitch of the track preclude certain shoes between any two adjacent rollers from having contact with a roller. This results in an inefficient track platform with an efficiency rating of about 65%. In the disclosed track roller system, each track shoe on the lower run of an endless track and along the length of the track roller system may be simultaneously and uniformly engaged by a roller. This results in two distinct advantages over the conventional roller system. First, vertical forces due to machine weight and machine operation may be more evenly distributed to the individual track shoes of the interconnected track shoe series engaged with the ground. This results in a track platform efficiency rating of 100%. Second, lateral forces due to machine turning or operation on uneven ground are also more evenly distributed to the individual track shoes.
The separate cantilever mounting of rollers to opposite sides of the track roller frame for engagement with the paired rail surfaces of the track shoes permits the asymmetric arrangement of the rollers, the resulting increase in the number of individual rollers, and the engagement of each track shoe substantially uniformly and simultaneously by an individual roller. The number of rollers in the track roller system is not limited by the size of the rollers to the same extent as in conventional systems. By having one roller for each track shoe, vertical machine support is increased. By having separate track roller series for each track shoe rail surface and a separate roller for each track shoe, better track guiding results with less chance of the track separating from the rollers. The asymmetric roller system also allows for farther reduction in adjacent roller to roller spacing beyond which is described in this disclosure. Further reduced roller spacing results in a track platform efficiency above 100%. This occurs when all shoes engaging the ground will have one or more roller contact points at any given point in time. Here, machine working loads are even more uniformly distributed onto the track platform that engages the ground.
Separate track roller series not only permits an arrangement of one roller for each track shoe, but also permits each roller to be larger in diameter than the length of a single track shoe with each roller of sufficient diameter to ensure adequate machine support. One roller for each track shoe prevents excessive shoe back bending between rollers. This reduces stress to track shoes and their pin joints, reducing damage to the track. One roller for each track shoe lowers track induced vibration during machine travel. Since one track roller contacts each track shoe along the lower run, there are no unproductive or partially productive track shoes. The efficiency of the track roller/track shoe system may be close to 100%.
A conventional track roller system comprising, for example, eight track rollers with paired, side-by-side roller surfaces will have sixteen wear points on track shoes along a lower run of twelve track shoes beneath the track roller system. By contrast, the disclosed asymmetric track roller system, for the same twelve track shoes beneath it, may have two, asymmetrically arranged track roller series of six track rollers each for a total of twelve track roller and only twelve wear points on the track shoes. Accordingly, the track shoe wear may be approximately 25% less than that which may occur with a conventional track roller system. For the same number of ground engaging track shoes beneath the track roller system, the wear points are reduced on each of the two rail surfaces from eight, for the conventional eight-roller system, to six for the disclosed asymmetric track roller system.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made in the disclosed roller system for machine undercarriage without departing from the scope of the disclosure. Other embodiments of the disclosed roller system for machine undercarriage will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered as exemplary only, with a true scope of the disclosure being indicated by the following claims and their equivalents.