The invention relates to a rolling-element bearing, in particular for a turbocharger, comprising an outer ring having a first rolling element raceway, an inner ring having a second rolling element raceway, and multiple rolling elements accommodated in rolling element pockets of a rolling element cage, wherein the rolling element cage comprises a guide surface, which is guided on an inner surface of the outer ring arranged on a smaller radius than the radius of the first rolling element raceway.
DE 43 27 815 A1 discloses an angular-contact ball hearing for a turbocharger comprising an outer ring and an inner ring, and arranged between these a rolling element cage in the form of an annular part having radially inserted rolling element pockets, in which spherical rolling elements are arranged, positioned over the circumference and each coming into rolling contact with a rolling element raceway of the outer ring and the inner rings. The angular-contact ball hearing disclosed is of axially open design, that is to say there are spaces present radially between the outer ring, the inner ring and the rolling element cage. This has the disadvantage, when the bearing is accommodated between volumes at least partially filled with lubricant, that under an incident flow the angular-contact ball bearing is flooded with lubricant and increased splash losses occur. Partial or complete flooding therefore leads to an unwanted increase in the bearing resistance.
The object of the invention therefore is to design a rolling-element bearing for high-speed rotational uses, in particular for turbochargers, which is protected against flooding and therefore has reduced coefficients of friction particularly when flooded.
According to the invention, in a rolling-element bearing, particularly one for a turbocharger, having the features of the preamble of claim 1, the object is achieved in that the rolling-element bearing is provided with a rolling element cage on which an extension, arranged over the circumference of the rolling element cage and extended annularly in the radial direction, is arranged on the side opposite the guide surface.
This represents a particularly advantageous way of providing a barrier on the lubricant incident flow side, which effectively prevents flooding of the rolling-element bearing whilst leaving the run-off side open. Here, such a barrier can be provided without any additional outlay for parts, making the proposed solution advantageous in terms of cost outlay, weight and the avoidance of additional friction due to any sealing parts used, such as seal lips. Furthermore, it is possible to provide merely approximate sealing so that lubrication of the hearing is ensured via a remaining annular gap and a large lubricant surge leading to flooding of the rolling-element bearing is avoided. For this purpose the radial extension is introduced into a gap between the guide surface and an annular outer surface of the inner ring, the latter closing the gap at least approximately. In this case the gap is at least 80% closed, preferably 90% closed.
In order to avoid splash losses from spaces between the outer ring and the inner ring when the rolling element cage is set axially back, the radial extension may be provided flush with the end faces of the outer ring and the inner ring, and the rolling element cage can be axially lengthened, so that in the direction of the incident flow side a common end face is formed between the inner ring, the rolling element cage provided with the radial extension and the outer ring.
Alternatively, in order to improve the centroid ratios of the rolling element cage, the radial extent can be shifted axially backwards in the direction of the rolling elements and thereby axially separated from the end face of the rolling-element bearing. For example, the radial extent may directly adjoin the outer circumference of the rolling element pockets.
Here, in its inclination the inner circumference of the radial extension may adjoin an opposing surface of the inner ring, so that over the axial extent of the inner circumference of the radial extension a constant annular gap is set relative to the outer surface and opposing surface of the inner ring. Similarly, with the opposing surface of the inner ring inclined in relation to the axis of rotation of the rolling-element bearing, the inner circumference of the radial extension may also be inclined to complement this.
Here, the rolling-element bearing may be designed so that a minimum axial distance between the rolling element pockets and an end face of the rolling element cage is substantially equal to the maximum radial width of the rolling element cage. This affords favorable stress loading. For example, a ratio between a minimum axial distance separating the rolling element pockets from an end face of the rolling element cage and the maximum radial extent of the rolling element cage may be designed to be between 0.5 and 2.
The invention is explained in more detail below with reference to the exemplary embodiments represented in
For guiding the annular rolling element cage 7, an annular inner surface 12, on which a guide surface 13 of the rolling element cage 7 is radially guided, is provided on the outer ring 3 radially inside the rolling element raceway 9 and the incident flow side in the direction of the arrow 11 and pressure side of the rolling-element bearing 1. The configuration of the inner ring 4, particularly with a flank 14 sloping towards the incident flow side, means that an annular gap 15, which is impaired substantially only by the rolling element cage 7 and the balls 6 and which under an incident flow in conventional rolling-element bearings of this type leads to a flooding of the rolling-element hearing 1 and thereby at high differential rotational speeds between the outer ring 3 and inner ring 4 to enormous splash losses of the rolling-element bearing, is formed between the outer ring 3 and the inner ring 4.
In order to prevent this, a radially inward-facing extension 17, which is formed over the circumference of the rolling element cage 7 and which closes the annular gap 15 to such a degree that the rolling-element bearing 1 is not flooded with lubricant, but lubrication is nevertheless maintained, is provided on the rolling element cage 7 on the side opposite the guide surface 13, that is to say on the inner surface 16 thereof. For this purpose, an annular gap 18, which is constricted in comparison to the annular gap 15 and which exposes an annular area of at most 20% and preferably less than 10% of the original area exposed by the annular gap 15, is provided between the flank 14 and the extension 17. The rear side of the bearing in the run-off direction remains open, unmodified in relation to the run-off space from which there is no threat of flooding.
In the exemplary embodiment shown, the radial extension terminates flush with the end face 19 of the rolling element cage 7. The end faces of the inner ring 4 and the outer ring 3 also advantageously align with the end face 19 here, so that splash losses are largely prevented. It goes without saying that, for particular exemplary embodiments entailing complete lubrication of the rolling-element bearing 1 from the run-off side, the extension 17 may be designed in the manner of a sealing lip on its inner circumference and may come into sealing contact with the flank 14.
In a modification of the rolling-element bearing 1 in
The rolling element cage 7b comprises the radially inward-facing extension 17b corresponding to the extension 17 in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2009 021 640.5 | May 2009 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP10/56725 | 5/17/2010 | WO | 00 | 9/19/2011 |