The invention relates in general to security systems which allow operation upon the receipt of a properly coded signal. More particularly, the invention relates to a security system or to a barrier operator system, such as a garage door operator, employing a transmitter and a receiver which communicate via code streams having at least a portion thereof which changes with multiple operation of the device.
It is well known in the art to provide garage door operators or other barrier operators which include an electric motor connectable through a transmission to a door or other movable barrier which is to be opened and closed. Since many of these systems are associated with residences, as well as with garages, it is important that opening of the barrier be permitted only by one who is authorized to obtain entry to the area which the barrier protects. Some garage door operator systems have in past employed mechanical lock and key arrangements associated with electrical switches mounted on the outside of the garage. While these systems enjoy a relatively high level of security, they are very inconvenient to use for a person because it necessitates them exiting their vehicle in order to send the command to open the garage door. This also may present some danger to people when they exit the relative security of their vehicle if someone may be waiting to do injury to them.
It is also well known to provide radio-controlled garage door operators which include a garage door operator unit having a radio receiver and a motor connected to be driven from the radio receiver. The radio receiver is adapted to receive radio frequency signals or other electromagnetic signals having particular signal characteristics which, when received, cause the door to be opened. More recently, such transmitter and receiver systems have become relatively more sophisticated in that they use radio transmitters which employ coded transmissions of multiple or three-valued digits, also known as “trinary bits” or other serial coded transmission techniques. Among these systems are U.S. Pat. No. 3,906,348 to Willmott, which employs a transmitter and receiver system wherein a plurality of mechanical switches may be used to set a stored authorization code.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,529,980 to Liotine et al. discloses a transmitter and receiver combination for use in a device such as a garage door operator wherein the transmitter stores an authorization code which is to be transmitted to and received by the receiver via a radio frequency link. In order to alter or update the authorization code contained within the transmitter, the receiver is equipped with a programming signal transmitter or light emitting diode which can send a digitized optical signal back to the transmitter where it is stored. Other systems also employing encoded transmissions are U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,037,201, 4,535,333, 4,638,433, 4,750,118 and 4,988,992.
While each of these devices have provided good security for the user, it is apparent that persons wishing to commit property or person-related crimes have become more sophisticated as well. It is known in the security industry today that devices are being made available that can intercept or steal rolling code.
Transequatorial Technology, Inc. sells integrated circuit code hopping encoders identified as Keeloq Model NTQ105, NTQ115, NTQ125D and NTQ129. Some of the Keeloq code hopping encoders generate serial codes having fixed portions, i.e., which do not change with repeated actuation of the encoding portion of the chip and rolling code portions which alter with each actuation of the encoding portion of the chip. In order to avoid, however, having the problem of the encoding portion of the chip having been inadvertently enabled and causing the rolling code to be altered on successive enabling attempts thereby leading to a rolling code which is transmitted and not recognized by a receiver, the keeloq code hopping encoders provide a window forward system, that is they are operable with systems having code receivers which recognize as a valid code not a single rolling code, but a plurality of rolling codes within a certain code window or window of values which are the values which would be generated on a relatively small number of switch closures as compared to the total number of rolling codes available. The problem with such a system, however, might arise if a user was away for a period of time or had inadvertently caused codes to be transmitted excluding the number of codes normally allowed within the valid forward code window. In that case, the rolling code would not be recognized by the receiver and the user could not gain entry without taking other measures to defeat the locking system or the garage door operator system which might involve the intervention of a trained engineer or technician.
Texas Instruments also has a prior system identified as the Mark Star TRC1300 and TRC1315 remote control transmitter/receiver combination. The System involves the user of a rolling code encoder which increments or rolls potentially the entire code, that is it does not leave a fixed portion. The system also includes a forward windowing function which allows an authorized user to be able to cause the receiver to be enabled within a limited number of key pushes. Like the keeloq system, if the forward window is exceeded, the Texas Instruments system must be placed in a learn mode to cause the system to relearn the code. In order to place the system into the learn mode, the person must obtain direct access to the receiver to cause a programming control system associated with the receiver to be hand actuated causing the receiver to enter a learn mode. Once the receiver has learned the new code, the receiver will then construct a new valid forward code window within which valid rolling codes may be received. The problem, of course, with such a system is that if, for instance in a garage door operator, the only portal of entry to the garage door is through the overhead door controlled by the garage door operator, the user will not be able to obtain entry to the garage without possibly having to do some damage to the structure. This problem is sometimes referred to in the industry as a “vaulted garage.”
What is needed is an economical encoding system which provides good security by using a rolling code, but which enables a user of the system to proceed via a gradually degraded pathway in the event that the receiver detects a signal condition indicative of what might be a lack of security.
The invention relates in general to an electronic system for providing remote security for entry of actuation of a particular device. Such a system may include a transmitter and receiver set, for instance with a hand-held transmitter and a receiver associated with a vehicle such as an automobile or the like. The transmitter, upon signaling the receiver, causing the vehicle to start up or to perform other functions. The system may also be useful in a barrier operator system such as a garage door operator by allowing the garage door to be opened and closed in a relatively secure fashion while preventing persons who may be intercepting the radio frequency signals from being able to, although unauthorized, cause the vehicle to being running or to allow access to the garage.
The system includes a transmitter generally having means for developing a fixed code and a rolling or variable code. The rolling or variable code is changed with each actuation of the transmitter. The fixed code remains the same for each actuation of the transmitter. In the present system, the transmitter. In the present system, the transmitter includes means for producing a 32-bit frame comprising the fixed portion of the code and a second 32-bit frame comprising the variable portion of the code. The 32-bit rolling code is then mirrored to provide a 32-bit mirrored rolling code. The 32-bit mirrored rolling code then has its most significant bit “deleted” by setting it to zero. The transmitter then converts the 32-bit fixed code and the mirrored variable code to a three-valued or trinary bit fixed code and a three-valued or trinary bit variable code or rolling code.
To provide further security, the fixed code and the rolling codes are shuffled so that alternating trinary bits are comprised of a fixed code bit and a rolling code bit to yield a total of 40 trinary bits. The 40 trinary bits are then packaged in a first 20-trinary bit frame and a second 20-trinary bit frame which have proceeding them a single synchronization and/or identification pulse indicating the start of the frame and whether it is the first frame or the second frame. Immediately following each of the frames, the transmitter is placed into a quieting condition to maintain the average power of the transmitter over a typical 100 millisecond interval within legal limits promulgated by the United States Federal Communications Commission. The first trinary frame and the second trinary frame are used to modulate a radio frequency carrier, in this case via muplitude modulation to produce an amplitude modulated encrypted signal. In a preferred embodiment, the radio frequency signal is amplitude modulated. The amplitude modulated signal is then launched and may be received by an AM receiver. In the preferred embodiment, the AM receiver receives the amplitude modulated signal, demodulates it to produce a pair of trinary bit encoded frames. The trinary bits in each of the frames are converted on the fly to 2-bit or half nibbles indicative of the values of the trinary bits which are ultimately used to form two 16-bit fixed code words and two 16-bit variable code words. The two 16-bit fixed code words are used as a pointer to identify the location of a previously stored rolling code value within the receiver. The two 16-bit rolling code words are concatenated by taking the 16-bit words having the more significant bits, multiplying it by 310 and then adding it to the second of the words to produce a 32-bit encrypted rolling code. In order to make certain that if the transmitter was inadvertently actuated a number of times, the authorized user can still start his car or gain entry to his garage. The 32-bit encrypted code is then compared via a binary substraction with the stored rolling code. If the 32-bit code is within a window or fixed count, in the present embodiment 1000, the microprocessor produces an authorization signal which is then responded to by other portions of the circuit to cause the garage door to open or close as commanded. In the event that the code is greater than the stored rolling code, plus 1000, indicative of a relatively large number of incrementations, the user is not locked out of the garage, but is allowed to provide further signals or indicia to the receiver that he is an authorized user without any significant degradation of the security. This is done by the receiver entering an alternate mode requiring two or more successive valid codes to be received, rather than just one. If the two or more successive valid codes are received, the garage door will open. However, in order to prevent a person who has previously or recently recorded a recent valid code from being able to obtain access to the garage, a trailing window, in this case starting at a count of 300 less than the present stored count and including all code values between the present stored count and 300 less is compared to the received code. If the received code is within this backward window, the response of the system simply is to take no further action, nor to provide authorization during that code cycle on the assumption that the code has been purloined.
Thus, the present system provides important advantages over the previous garage door operator systems and even previous rolling code systems. The system provides a multiple segmented windowed system which provides a valid code window, a second relatively insecure code window in which two successive valid codes must be received and finally a window in which no valid codes are recognized due to the likelihood of the receiver having been stolen.
It is a principal object of the present invention to provide a security system involving a radio frequency transmitter and receiver wherein multiple security conditions may exist requiring different levels of signal security.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a secure radio transmitter receiver system which may rapidly and easily decode a relatively large code combination.
Other advantages of the invention will become obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art upon a perusal of the following specification and claims in light of the accompanying drawings.
Referring now to the drawings and especially to
An optical emitter 42 is connected via a power and signal line 44 to the head unit. An optical detector 46 is connected via a wire 48 to the head unit 12.
Referring now to
The microcontroller is coupled via the serial bus 79 to a chip select port, a clock port and a DI port to which and from which serial data may be written and read and to which addresses may be applied. As will be seen hereinafter in the operation of the microcontroller, the microcontroller 78 produces output signals at the lead 81, which are supplied to a resistor 125 which is coupled to a voltage dividing resistor 126 feeding signals to the lead 127. A 30-nanohenry inductor 128 is coupled to an NPN transistor 129 at its base 130. The transistor 129 has a collector 131 and an emitter 132. The collector 131 is connected to the antenna 83 which, in this case, comprises a printed circuit board, loop antenna having an inductance of 25-nanohenries, comprising a portion of the tank circuit with a capacitor 133, a variable capacitor 134 for tuning, a capacitor 135 and a capacitor 136. An 30-nanohenry inductor 138 is coupled via a capacitor 139 to ground. The capacitor has a resistor 140 connected in parallel with it to ground. When the output from lead 81 is driven high by the microcontroller, the capacitor Q1 is switched on causing the tank circuit to output a signal on the antenna 83. When the capacitor is switched off, the output to the drive the tank circuit is extinguished causing the radio frequency signal at the antenna 83 also to be extinguished.
Referring now to
Referring now to
The microcontroller 214 may have its mode of operation controlled by a programming or learning switch 300 coupled via a line 302 to the P25 pin. A command switch 304 is coupled via a jumper 306 to a line 308 and ultimately through a resistor to the input pin P22. A pin P21 sinks current through a resistor 314 connected to a light emitting diode 316, causing the diode to light to indicate that the receiver is active. The microcontroller 214 has a 4 MHz crystal 328 connected to it to provide clock signals and includes an RS232 output port 332 that is coupled to the pin P31. A switch 340 selects whether constant pressure or monostable is to be selected as the output from output terminals P24 and P23 which are coupled to a transistor 350 which, when switched on, sinks current through a coil 352 of a relay 354, causing the relay to close to provide an actuating signal on a pair of leads 356 and 358 to an electric motor.
It may be appreciated that the power supply 204 may receive power from an external transformer or other AC source through a jack 370 which is connected to a pair of RJ uncoupling capacitors 372 and 374. The input signal is then set to a full-wave rectifier bridge 376 which provides an output current at a resistor 378. An 18-volt Zener diode 380 is connected between ground and the resistor 378 and includes high frequency bypass capacitor 382 connected in parallel with it. An 8.2-volt Zener diode 384 is connected in back-biased configuration to the resistor 378 to receive a signal therefrom to guarantee that at least an 8.2-volt signal is fed to a resistor 390 causing an LED 293 to be illuminated and also causing power to be supplied to a 5-volt 78L05 voltage regulator 396. The voltage regulator 396 supplies regulated voltage to an output line 398. Filtering capacitors 400a, 400b, 400c and 400d limit the fluctuations at the power supply.
The program code listing for the transmitter is set forth at pages A-1 through A-19 and for the receiver at pages A-20 through A-51 of the attached appendix. Referring now to
In a step 510, the next highest power of 3 is subtracted from the rolling code and a test is made in a step 512 to determine if the result is greater than zero. If it is, the next most significant digit of the binary rolling code is incremented in a step 514, following which flow is returned to the step 510. If the result is not greater than 0, the next highest power of 3 is added to the rolling code in the step 516. In the step 518, another highest power of 3 is incremented and in a step 518, another highest power of 3 is incremented and in a step 520, a test is determined as to whether the rolling code is completed. If it is not, control is transferred back to step 510. If it has, control is transferred to step 522 to clear the bit counter. In a step 524, the blank time is tested to determine whether it is active or not. If it is not, a test is made in a step 526 to determine whether the blank time has expired. If the blank time has not expired, control is transferred to a step 528 in which the bit counter is incremented, following which control is transferred back to the decision step 524. If the blank time has expired as measured in decision step 526, the blank time is stopped in a step 530 and the bit counter is incremented in a step 532. The bit counter is then tested for odd or even in a step 534. If the bit counter is not even, control is transferred to a step 536 where the output bit of the bit counter divided by 2 is fixed. If the bit counter is even, the output bit counter divided by 2 is rolling in a step 538. The bit counter is tested to determine whether it is set to equal to 80 in a step 540. If it is, the blank timer is started in a step 542. If it is not, the bit counter is tested for whether it is equal to 40 in a step 546. If it is, the blank timer is tested and is started in a step 544. If the bit counter is not equal to 40, control is transferred back to step 522.
Referring now to
In the event that the inactive time is between 20 milliseconds and 55 milliseconds, a test is made in a step 720 to determine whether the active time is greater than 1 millisecond, as shown in
In the event that the bit counter test in step 712 indicates that the bit counter is not 0, control is transferred to setup 736, as shown in
If the result of the step 744 is in the negative, the bit value is set equal to 1 in step 748. Control is then transferred to the step 743 to test whether the bit counter is set to an odd or an even number. If it is set to an odd number, control is transferred to a step 750 where the fixed code, indicative of the fact that the bit is an odd numbered bit in the frame sequence, rather an even number bit, which would imply that it is one of the interleaved rolling code bits, is multiplied by three and then the bit value added in.
If the bit counter indicates that it is an odd number trinary bit being processed, the existing rolling code registers are multiplied by three and then the trinary bit value obtained from steps 742, 746 and 748 is added in. Whether step 750 or 752 occurs, the bit counter value is then tested in the step 754, as shown in
While there has been illustrated and described a particular embodiment of the present invention, it will be appreciated that numerous changes and modifications will occur to those skilled in the art, and it is intended in the appended claims to cover all those changes and modifications which fall within the true spirit and scope of the present invention.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/177,366 filed Jul. 22, 2008; which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/313,331 filed Dec. 21, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,623,663; which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/884,051 filed Jul. 2, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,492,898; which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/215,900, filed Aug. 9, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,810,123; which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/981,433, filed Oct. 17, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,980,655; which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/489,073, filed Jan. 21, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,690,796; which is a division of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/873,149, filed Jun. 11, 1997, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,154,544; which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/446,886, filed May 17, 1995, now abandoned; which are all hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2405500 | Guanella | Aug 1946 | A |
3716865 | Willmott | Feb 1973 | A |
3735106 | Hollaway | May 1973 | A |
3792446 | McFiggins et al. | Feb 1974 | A |
3798359 | Feistel | Mar 1974 | A |
3798360 | Feistel | Mar 1974 | A |
3798544 | Norman | Mar 1974 | A |
3798605 | Feistel | Mar 1974 | A |
3845277 | Voss et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
3890601 | Pietrolewicz | Jun 1975 | A |
3906348 | Willmott | Sep 1975 | A |
3938091 | Atalla et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
4037201 | Willmott | Jul 1977 | A |
4064404 | Willmott et al. | Dec 1977 | A |
RE29525 | Willmott | Jan 1978 | E |
4078152 | Tuckerman, III | Mar 1978 | A |
4138735 | Allocca et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4178549 | Ledenbach et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
4195196 | Feistel | Mar 1980 | A |
4195200 | Feistel | Mar 1980 | A |
4196310 | Forman et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4218738 | Matyas et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
4304962 | Fracassi et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4305060 | Apple et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4316055 | Feistel | Feb 1982 | A |
4326098 | Bouricius et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4327444 | Court | Apr 1982 | A |
4328414 | Atalla | May 1982 | A |
4328540 | Matsuoka et al. | May 1982 | A |
RE30957 | Feistel | Jun 1982 | E |
4380762 | Capasso | Apr 1983 | A |
4385296 | Tsubaki et al. | May 1983 | A |
4393269 | Konheim et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4418333 | Schwarzbach et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4426637 | Apple et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4445712 | Smagala-Romanoff | May 1984 | A |
4447890 | Duwel et al. | May 1984 | A |
4454509 | Buennagel et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4464651 | Duhame | Aug 1984 | A |
4471493 | Schober | Sep 1984 | A |
4491774 | Schmitz | Jan 1985 | A |
4509093 | Stellberger | Apr 1985 | A |
4529980 | Liotine et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4535333 | Twardowski | Aug 1985 | A |
4574247 | Jacob | Mar 1986 | A |
4578530 | Zeidler | Mar 1986 | A |
4580111 | Swanson | Apr 1986 | A |
4581606 | Mallory | Apr 1986 | A |
4590470 | Koenig | May 1986 | A |
4593155 | Hawkins | Jun 1986 | A |
4596898 | Pemmaraju | Jun 1986 | A |
4596985 | Bongard et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4599489 | Cargile | Jul 1986 | A |
4602357 | Yang et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4611198 | Levinson et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4623887 | Welles, II | Nov 1986 | A |
4626848 | Ehlers | Dec 1986 | A |
4628315 | Douglas | Dec 1986 | A |
4630035 | Stahl et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4633247 | Hegeler | Dec 1986 | A |
4638433 | Schindler | Jan 1987 | A |
4646080 | Genest et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4652860 | Weishaupt et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4653076 | Jerrim et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4670746 | Taniguchi et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4686529 | Kleefeldt | Aug 1987 | A |
4695839 | Barbu et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4703359 | Rumbolt et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4710613 | Shigenaga | Dec 1987 | A |
4716301 | Willmott et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4720860 | Weiss | Jan 1988 | A |
4723121 | van den Boom et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4731575 | Sloan | Mar 1988 | A |
4737770 | Brunius et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4740792 | Sagey et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4750118 | Heitschel et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4754255 | Sanders et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4755792 | Pezzolo et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4758835 | Rathmann et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4761808 | Howard | Aug 1988 | A |
4779090 | Micznik et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4794268 | Nakano et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4794622 | Isaacman et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4796181 | Wiedemer | Jan 1989 | A |
4799061 | Abraham et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4800590 | Vaughan | Jan 1989 | A |
4802114 | Sogame | Jan 1989 | A |
4804938 | Rouse et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4807052 | Amano | Feb 1989 | A |
4808995 | Clark et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4825200 | Evans et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4825210 | Bachhuber et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4831509 | Jones et al. | May 1989 | A |
4835407 | Kataoka et al. | May 1989 | A |
4845491 | Fascenda et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4847614 | Keller | Jul 1989 | A |
4855713 | Brunius | Aug 1989 | A |
4856081 | Smith | Aug 1989 | A |
4859990 | Isaacman | Aug 1989 | A |
4870400 | Downs et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4878052 | Schulze | Oct 1989 | A |
4881148 | Lambropoulos et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4885778 | Weiss | Dec 1989 | A |
4888575 | De Vaulx | Dec 1989 | A |
4890108 | Drori et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4905279 | Nishio | Feb 1990 | A |
4910750 | Fisher | Mar 1990 | A |
4912463 | Li | Mar 1990 | A |
4914696 | Dudczak et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4918690 | Markkula, Jr. et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4922168 | Waggamon et al. | May 1990 | A |
4922533 | Philippe | May 1990 | A |
4928098 | Dannhaeuser | May 1990 | A |
4931789 | Pinnow | Jun 1990 | A |
4939792 | Urbish et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4942393 | Waraksa et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4951029 | Severson | Aug 1990 | A |
4963876 | Sanders et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4979832 | Ritter | Dec 1990 | A |
4980913 | Skret | Dec 1990 | A |
4988992 | Heitschel et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4992783 | Zdunek et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4999622 | Amano et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5001332 | Schrenk | Mar 1991 | A |
5023908 | Weiss | Jun 1991 | A |
5049867 | Stouffer | Sep 1991 | A |
5055701 | Takeuchi | Oct 1991 | A |
5058161 | Weiss | Oct 1991 | A |
5060263 | Bosen et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5103221 | Memmola | Apr 1992 | A |
5107258 | Soum | Apr 1992 | A |
5126959 | Kurihara | Jun 1992 | A |
5144667 | Pogue, Jr. et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5146067 | Sloan et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5148159 | Clark et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5153581 | Hazard | Oct 1992 | A |
5159329 | Lindmayer et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5168520 | Weiss | Dec 1992 | A |
5193210 | Nicholas et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5224163 | Gasser et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5237614 | Weiss | Aug 1993 | A |
5252960 | Duhame | Oct 1993 | A |
5278907 | Snyder et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5280527 | Gullman et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5331325 | Miller | Jul 1994 | A |
5361062 | Weiss et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5363448 | Koopman, Jr. et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5365225 | Bachhuber | Nov 1994 | A |
5367572 | Weiss | Nov 1994 | A |
5369706 | Latka | Nov 1994 | A |
5412379 | Waraksa et al. | May 1995 | A |
5414418 | Andros, Jr. | May 1995 | A |
5420925 | Michaels | May 1995 | A |
5442341 | Lambropoulos | Aug 1995 | A |
5444737 | Cripps et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5463376 | Stoffer | Oct 1995 | A |
5471668 | Soenen et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5473318 | Martel | Dec 1995 | A |
5479512 | Weiss | Dec 1995 | A |
5485519 | Weiss | Jan 1996 | A |
5517187 | Bruwer et al. | May 1996 | A |
5528621 | Heiman et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5530697 | Watanabe | Jun 1996 | A |
5554977 | Jablonski et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
RE35364 | Heitschel et al. | Oct 1996 | E |
5563600 | Miyake | Oct 1996 | A |
5594429 | Nakahara | Jan 1997 | A |
5598475 | Soenen et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5608723 | Felsenstein | Mar 1997 | A |
5657388 | Weiss | Aug 1997 | A |
5678213 | Myer | Oct 1997 | A |
5680131 | Utz | Oct 1997 | A |
5686904 | Bruwer | Nov 1997 | A |
5745068 | Takahashi et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5774065 | Mabuchi et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5778348 | Manduley et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5872519 | Issa et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5898397 | Murray | Apr 1999 | A |
5936999 | Keskitalo | Aug 1999 | A |
5937065 | Simon et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6154544 | Farris et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6166650 | Bruwer | Dec 2000 | A |
6175312 | Bruwer et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6275519 | Hendrickson | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6463538 | Elteto | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6690796 | Farris et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6810123 | Farris et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6980655 | Farris et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7332999 | Fitzgibbon | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7412056 | Farris et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7492905 | Fitzgibbon | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7623663 | Farris et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
20060109978 | Farris et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3234538 | Mar 1984 | DE |
3234539 | Mar 1984 | DE |
3244049 | Sep 1984 | DE |
3309802 | Sep 1984 | DE |
3320721 | Dec 1984 | DE |
3407436 | Aug 1985 | DE |
3407469 | Sep 1985 | DE |
3532156 | Mar 1987 | DE |
3636822 | Oct 1987 | DE |
4204463 | Aug 1992 | DE |
0043270 | Jan 1982 | EP |
0103790 | Mar 1984 | EP |
0154019 | Sep 1985 | EP |
0155378 | Sep 1985 | EP |
0244322 | Nov 1987 | EP |
0244332 | Nov 1987 | EP |
0335912 | Jun 1988 | EP |
0311112 | Apr 1989 | EP |
0372285 | Jun 1990 | EP |
0459781 | Dec 1991 | EP |
0857842 | Aug 1998 | EP |
2607544 | Mar 1988 | FR |
2606232 | Jun 1988 | FR |
2685520 | Jun 1993 | FR |
1156279 | Jun 1969 | GB |
2023899 | Jan 1980 | GB |
2051442 | Apr 1981 | GB |
2099195 | Dec 1982 | GB |
2118614 | Nov 1983 | GB |
2131992 | Jun 1984 | GB |
2133073 | Jul 1984 | GB |
2184774 | Jul 1987 | GB |
2254461 | Oct 1992 | GB |
2265482 | Sep 1993 | GB |
H6205474 | Jul 1994 | JP |
PCTAU9300137 | Oct 1993 | WO |
WO9320538 | Oct 1993 | WO |
PCTFR9301140 | May 1994 | WO |
WO9411829 | May 1994 | WO |
PCTDE9400147 | Aug 1994 | WO |
WO9418036 | Aug 1994 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Microchip v. The Chamberlain Group, Inc., (TCG019874-019918); Deposition of J. Fitzgibbon; Dated: Mar. 16, 1999. |
Microchip v. The Chamberlain Group, Inc., Civil Action No. 98-C-6138; (TCG024334-24357); Declaration of V. Thomas Rhyne; Dated: Feb. 22, 1999. |
MM57HS01 HiSeC.TM. Fixed and Rolling Code Decoder, National Semiconductor, Nov. 11, 1994, 1-8. |
Morris, Robert. “The Hagelin Cipher Machine (M-209): Reconstruction of the Internal Settings”, 2(3): pp. 267-289, Cryptologia, Jul. 1978. |
Newman, David B., Jr. et al., “Public Key Management for Network Security”, pp. 11-16, IEEE Network Magazine, 1987. |
Nickels, Hamilton, “Secrets of Making and Breading Codes” Paladin Press, 1990, pp. 11-29. |
Niederreiter, Harald. “Keystream Sequences with a Good Linear Complexity Profile for Every Starting Point”, pp. 523-532, Proceedings of Eurocrypt 89, 1989. |
NM95HS01/NM95HS02 HiSeC.TM. (High Security Code) Generator, National Semiconductor, Jan. 1995, 1-19. |
Otway, Dave and Rees, Owen. “Efficient and Timely Mutual Authentication”, pp. 8-11, Jan. 1987. |
Peebles, Jr., Peyton Z. and Giuma, Tayeb A.; “Principles of Electrical Engineering” McGraw Hill, Inc., 1991, pp. 562-597. |
Peyret, Patrice et al. “Smart Cards Provide Very High Security and Flexibility in Subscribers Management”, 744-752, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 36(3): Aug. 1990. |
Postel, J. ed. “DOD Standard Transmission Control Protocol”, pp. 52-133, Jan. 1980. |
Postel, Jonathan B. et al., “The ARPA Internet Protocol”, pp. 261-271, 1981. |
Reed, David P. and Kanodia, Rajendra K. “Synchronization With Eventcounts and Sequencers”, vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 115-123, Communications of the ACM, Feb. 1979. |
Reynolds, J. and J. Postel. “Official ARPA-Internet Protocols”, Network Working Groups, Apr. 1985. |
Roden, Martin S., “Analog and Digital Communication Systems,” Third Edition, Prentice Hall, 1979, pp. 282-460. |
Ruffell, J. “Battery Low Indicator,” p. 59, Eleckton Electronics 15-165, Mar. 1989. |
Saab Anti-Theft System: “Saab's Engine Immobilizing Anti-Theft System is a Road-Block for Code-Grabbing Thieves”, pp. 1-2, Aug. 1996; http://www.saabusa.com/news/newsindex/alarm.html. |
Savage, J.E. “Some Simple Self-Synchronizing Digital Data Scramblers”, pp. 449-487, The Bell System Tech. Journal, Feb. 1967. |
Schedule of Confidential Non-Patent Literature Documents; Apr. 1, 2008. |
Seberry, J. and Pieprzyk, Cryptography—An Introduction to Computer Security, Prentice Hall of Australia, YTY Ltd, 1989, pp. 134-136. |
Shamir, Adi. “Embedding Cryptographic Trapdoors in Arbitrary Knapsack Systems”, pp. 77-79, Information Processing Letters, 1983. |
Siegenthaler, T. “Decrypting a Class of Stream Ciphers Using Ciphertext Only”, vol. C-34, No. 1, pp. 81-85, IEEE Transactions on Computers, Jan. 1985. |
Simmons, Gustavus J. “Message Authentication With Arbitration of Transmitter/Receiver Disputes”, pp. 151-165, 1987. |
Smith, J.L. et al. “An Experimental Application of Cryptography to a Remotely Accessed Data System”, Proceedings of the ACM, pp. 282-297, Aug. 1972. |
Smith, J.L. The Design of Lucifer: A Cryptographic Device for Data Communications, pp. 1-65, Apr. 15, 1971. |
Smith, Jack, “Modem Communication Circuits” McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1986, Chapter 11, pp. 420-454. |
Smith, Jack, “Modem Communication Circuits” McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1986, Chapter 7, pp. 231-294. |
Svigals, J. “Limiting Access to Data in an Identification Card Having a Micro-Processor”, IBM: Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 27, No. 1B, pp. 580-581, Jun. 1984. |
Thatcham: The Motor Insurance Repair Research Centre, The British Insurance Industry's Criteria for Vehicle Security (Jan. 1993) (Lear 18968-19027), pp. 1-36. |
Turn, Rein. “Privacy Transformations for Databank Systems”, pp. 589-601, National Computer Conference, 1973. |
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Civil Action No. 05-C-3449, Declaration of Robert Louis Stevenson, Jr., Jun. 26, 2009. |
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Civil Action No. 05-C-3449, JCI's Local Rule 56.1 Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of Their Motion for Summary Judgment of Infringement of the '056 Patent; Jul. 6, 2009. |
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Civil Action No. 05-C-3449, JCI's Local Rule 56.1 Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of Their Motion for Summary Judgment of Infringement of the '544 Patent; Jul. 6, 2009. |
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Civil Action No. 05-C-3449, JCI's Memorandum of Law in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment of Infringement of the '056 Patent, Jul. 6, 2009. |
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Civil Action No. 05-C-3449, JCI's Memorandum of Law in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment of Infringement of the '544 Patent, Jul. 6, 2009. |
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Civil Action No. 05-C-3449, Memorandum Opinion and Order, Nov. 24, 2010. |
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Civil Action No. 05-CV-3449, Defendant Lear Corporation's Answer to Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint, Defenses, and Counterclaim; Dated Sep. 8, 2008. |
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Civil Action No. 05-CV-3449, Defendant Lear Corporation's Answer to Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint, Defenses, and Counterclaim; Sep. 8, 2008. |
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Civil Action No. 05-CV-3449, Defendant Lear Corporation's Reply Memorandum in Support of Its Motion to Stay Effectiveness of Any Preliminary Injunction; Apr. 17, 2007. |
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Civil Action No. 05-CV-3449, Lear Corporation Memorandum of Law in Support of Its Motion for Summary Judgment of U.S. Patent No. 7,412,056; Dec. 8, 2008. |
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Civil Action No. 05-CV-3449, Lear Corporation's Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims to Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint; Oct. 24, 2005. |
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Civil Action No. 05-CV-3449, Lear Corporation's Memorandum of Law in Support of Its Emergency Motion to Stay the Effectiveness of the Preliminary Injunction Memorandum Opinion and Order; Entered: Mar. 30, 2007. |
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Civil Action No. 05-CV-3449, Lear Corporation's Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's Sep. 11, 2006 Memorandum Opinion and Order Regarding Claim Construction; Sep. 25, 2006. |
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Civil Action No. 05-CV-3449, Lear Corporation's Post-Markman Brief; Jun. 15, 2006. |
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Civil Action No. 05-CV-3449, Memorandum Opinion and Order, Apr. 25, 2007. |
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Civil Action No. 05-CV-3449, Memorandum Opinion and Order, Feb. 20, 2007. |
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Civil Action No. 05-CV-3449, Memorandum Opinion and Order, Sep. 11, 2006. |
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Civil Action No. 05-CV-3449, Memorandum Opinion and Order; Mar. 30, 2007. |
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Civil Action No. 05-CV-3449, Notice of Motion and Motion for Leave to File Defendant Lear Corporation's Sur-Reply to Chamberlain's and JCI's Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction Dated Mar. 30, 2006. |
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Civil Action No. 05-CV-3449, Notice of Motion and Motion for Leave to File Defendant Lear Corporation's Sur-Reply to Chamberlain's and JCI's Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction; Dated Mar. 20, 2006. |
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Civil Action No. 05-CV-3449, Plaintiffs' Opposition to Lear Corporation's Motion to Stay the Effectiveness of the Preliminary Injunction Memorandum Opinion and Order Entered Mar. 30, 2008. |
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Civil Action No. 05-CV-3449, Plaintiffs' Response to Lear's Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's Sep. 11, 2006 Ruling Regarding Claim Construction; Oct. 4, 2006. |
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Civil Action No. 05-CV-3449, Plaintiffs' Surreply Memorandum in Opposition to Lear's Motion to Stay the Preliminary Injunction, Apr. 24, 2007. |
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Civil Action No. 05-CV-3449, Plaintiffs' Surreply Memorandum in Opposition to Lear's Motion to Stay the Preliminary Injunction; Apr. 20, 2007. |
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Civil Action No. 05-CV-3449, Plaintiffs' Surreply Memorandum in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction; Jun. 8, 2006. |
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Civil Action No. 05-CV-3449, Reply Brief in Support of Lear's Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's Sep. 11, 2006 Ruling Regarding Claim Construction; Oct. 11, 2006. |
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Civil Action No. 05-CV-3449, Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Defendant Lear Corporation's Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Mar. 2, 2007. |
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Civil Action No. 05-CV-3449, Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Defendant Lear Corporation's Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction; Mar. 2, 2007. |
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Civil Action No. 05-CV-3449, Transcript of Deposition of Bradford L. Farris, Jan. 12, 2006. |
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Civil Action No. 05-CV-3449, Transcript of Deposition of Hubert E. Dunsmore, Jan. 12, 2006. |
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Civil Action No. 05-CV-3449, Transcript of Proceedings Before the Honorable James B. Moran, May 31, 2006. |
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in Case No. 05-CV-3449, Brief of Defendant-Appellant Lear Corporation; Jun. 18, 2007. |
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in Case No. 05-CV-3449, Brief of the Chamberlain Group, Inc. and Johnson Controls Interiors LLC; Aug. 8, 2007. |
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in Case No. 05-CV-3449, Combined Petition for Panel Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc of Chamberlain Group, Inc. and Johnson Controls Interiors LLC; Dated Mar. 19, 2008. |
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in Case No. 05-CV-3449, Reply Brief of Defendant-Appellant Lear Corporation, Aug. 27, 2007. |
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in Case No. 05-CV-3449, Reply Brief of Defendant-Appellant Lear Corporation, Aug. 29, 2007. |
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in Case No. 05-CV-3449, Response of Defendant-Appellant Lear Corporation to Combined Petition for Panel Rehearing and En Blanc of Chamberlain Group Inc. and Johnson Controls Interior LLC; Dated Mar. 8, 2008. |
United States Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Civil Action 05 C 3449, Notice Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 282, Mar. 4, 2011. |
United States International Trade Commission in the Matter of Certain Code Hopping Remote Control Systems, Including Components and Integrated Circuits Used Therein; Investigation No. 337-TA-417; Expert Report of Dr. V. Thomas Rhyne;(TCG019919-19959); Partially redacted; Dated Jul. 7, 1999. |
United States International Trade Commission, Washington, D., Investigation No. 337-TA-417; Respondents' Answer to Complaint and Notice of Investigation, Jan. 26, 1999. |
US. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Civil Action No. 05-CV-3449, Lear Corporation Memorandum of Law inSupport of Its Motion for Summary Judgement of U.S. Patent No. 7,412,056; Dated: Dec. 8, 2008. |
Voydock, Victor L. and Kent, Stephen T. “Security in High-Level Network Protocols”, IEEE Communications Magazine, pp. 12-25, vol. 23, No. 7, Jul. 1985. |
Voydock, Victor L. and Kent, Stephen T. “Security Mechanisms in a Transport Layer Protocol”, Computers & Security, 325-341, 1985. |
Voydock, Victor L. and Kent, Stephen T. “Security Mechanisms in High-Level Network Protocols”, Computing Surveys, pp. 135-171, vol. 15, No. 2, Jun. 1983. |
Watts, Charles and Harper, Jon, How to Design a HiSeC.TM. Transmitter, National Semiconductor, Oct. 1994, 1-4. |
Watts, Charles, How to Program the HiSeC.TM. Remote Keyless Entry Rolling Code Generator, National Semiconductor, Oct. 1994, 1-14. |
Weinstein, S.B. “Smart credit cards: the answer to cashless shopping”, IEEE Spectrum, pp. 43-49, Feb. 1984. |
Weissman, C. “Security controls in the ADEPT-50 time-sharing system”, AFIPS Full Joint Computer Conference, pp. 119-133, 1969. |
Welsh, Dominic, Codes and Cryptography, pp. 7.0-7.1 Clarendon Press, 1988. |
Whitfield Diffie and Martin E. Hellman, Privacy and Authentication: An Introduction to Cryptography, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 67, No. 3, Mar. 1979, 397-427. |
Wolfe, James Raymond, “Secret Writing—The Craft of the Cryptographer” McGraw-Hill Book Company 1970, pp. 111-122, Chapter 10. |
“Access Transmitters—Access Security System”, pp. 1-2, Undated. http://www.webercreations.com/access/security.httnl. |
“News: Key system for security”, p. 68, Apr. 1982. |
“Secure Terminal Interface Module for Smart Card Applications”, IBM: Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 1488-1489, Sep. 1985. |
“Transaction Completion Code Based on Digital Signatures”, IBM: Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 1109-1122, Aug. 1985. |
Abrams, and Podell, “Tutorial Computer and Network Security,” District of Columbia: IEEE, 1987. pp. 1075-1081. |
Abramson, Norman. “The Aloha System—Another alternative for computer communications,” pp. 281-285, University of Hawaii, 1970. |
Adams, Russ, Classified, data-scrambling program for Apple II, Info-World, vol. 5, No. 3; Jan. 31, 1988. |
Alexi, Werner, et al. “RSA and Rabin Functions: Certain Parts are as Hard as the Whole”, pp. 194-209, Siam Computing, vol. 14, No. 2, Apr. 1988. |
Allianz Allianz-Zentrum for Technik GmbH—“Detailed requirements for fulfilling the specification profile for electronically coded OEM immobilizers”, Issue 22, Jun. 1994 (Translation Jul. 5, 1994). |
Anderson, Ross. “Searching for the Optimum Correlation Attack”, pp. 136-143, Computer Laboratory, Pembroke Street, Cambridge CB2 3QG, Copyright 1995. |
Arazi, Benjamin, Vehicular Implementations of Public Key Cryptographic Techniques, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 40, No. 3, Aug. 1991, 646-653. |
Baran, P. Distribution Communications, vol. 9, “Security Secrecy and Tamper-free Communications”, Rand Corporation, 1964. |
Barbaroux, Paul. “Uniform Results in. Polynomial-Time Security”, pp. 297-306, Advances in Cryptology—Eurocrypt 92, 1992. |
Barlow, Mike, “A Mathematical Word Block Cipher,” 12 Cryptologia 256-264 (1988). |
Bellovin, S.M. “Security Problems in the TCPIIP Protocol Suite”, pp. 32-49, Computer Communication Review, New Jersey, Reprinted from Computer Communication Review, vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 32-48, Apr. 1989. |
Beutelspacher, Albrecht. Advances in Cryptology-Eurocrypt 87: “Perfect and Essentially Perfect Authentication Schemes” (Extended Abstract), pp. 167-170, Federal Republic of Germany, Copyright 1998, Springer-Verlag. |
Bloch, Gilbert. “Enigma Before Ultra Polish Work and the French Contribution”, 11(3): 142-155, Cryptologia, Jul. 1987. |
Bosworth, Bruce, “Codes, Ciphers, and Computers: An Introduction to Information Security” Hayden Book Company, Inc. 1982, pp. 30-54. |
Brickell, Ernest F. and Stinson, Doug. “Authentication Codes With Multiple Arbiters”, pp. 51-55, Proceedings of Eurocrypt 88, 1988. |
Bruwer, Frederick J. “Die Toepassing Van Gekombineerde Konvolusiekodering en Modulasie op HF-Datakommuikasie,” District of Pretoria in South Africa Jul. 1998. |
Burger, Chris R., Secure Learning RKE Systems Using KeeLoq.RTM. Encoders, TB001, 1996 Microchip Technology, Inc., 1-7. |
Burmeister, Mike. “A Remark on the Efficiency of Identification Schemes”, pp. 493-495, Advances in Cryptology—Eurocrypt 90, 1990. |
Cattermole, K.W., “Principles of Pulse Code Modulation” Iliffe Books Ltd., 1969, pp. 30-381. |
Cerl, Vinton a “Issues in Packet-Network Interconnection”, pp. 1386-1408, Proceedings of the IEEE, 66(11), Nov. 1978. |
Cerf, Vinton G. and Kahn, Robert E. “A Protocol for Packet Network Intercommunication”, pp. 637-648, Transactions on Communications, vol. Com-22, No. 5, May 1974. |
Computer Arithmetic by Henry Jacobowitz; Library of Congress Catalog Card No. 62-13396; Copyright Mar. 1962 by John F. Rider Publisher, Inc. |
Conner, Doug, Cryptographic Techniques—Secure Your Wireless Designs, EDN (Design Feature), Jan. 18, 1996, 57-68. |
Coppersmith, Don. “Fast Evaluation of Logarithms in Fields of Characteristic Two”, IT-30(4): pp. 587-594, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, Jul. 1984. |
Daniels, George, “Pushbutton Controls for Garage Doors” Popular Science (Aug. 1959), pp. 156-160. |
Davies, D.W. and Price, W.C. “Security for Computer Networks,” John Wiley and Sons, 1984. Chapter 7, pp. 175-176. |
Davies, Donald W., “Tutorial: The Security of Data in Networks,” pp. 13-17, New York: IEEE, 1981. |
Davis, Ben and DeLong, Ron, Combined Remote Key Control and Immobilization System for Vehicle Security, Power Electronics in Transportation, IEEE Catalogue No. 96TH8184, Oct. 24, 1996, 125-132. |
Davis, Gregory and Palmer, Morris. “Self-Programming, Rolling-Code Technology Creates Nearly Unbreakable RF Security”, Technological Horizons, Texas Instruments, Inc. (ECN), Oct. 1996. |
Dawson, Steven, Keeloq.RTM. Code Hopping Decoder Using Secure Learn, AN662, 1997 Microchip Technology, Inc., 1-16. |
De Soete, Marijke. “Some Constructions for Authentication-Secrecy Codes”, pp. 57-75, Advances in Cryptology-4 Eurocrypt 88, C.G. Gunther, editor. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 434, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1988. pp. 57-76. |
Deavours, C.A. and Kruh, L. “The Swedish HC-9 Ciphering Machine”, 251-285, Cryptologia, 13(3): Jul. 1989. |
Deavours, C.A. and Reeds, James. “The Enigma, Part 1, Historical Perspectives”, 381-391, Cryptologia, 1(4): Oct. 1977. |
Deavours, Cipher A., et al. “Analysis of the Hebern cryptograph Using Isomorphs”, pp. 246-261, Cryptology: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow, vol. 1, No. 2, Apr. 1977. |
Denning, Dorothy E. “A Lattice Model of Secure Information Flow”, pp. 236-238, 240, 242, Communications of the ACM, vol. 19, No. 5, May 1976. |
Denning, Dorothy E. “Cryptographic Techniques”, pp. 135-154, Cryptography and Data Security, 1982. Chapter 3. |
Diffie and Hellman, Exhaustive Cryptanalysis of the NB.S Data Encryption Standard, pp. 74-84, Computer, Jun. 1977. |
Diffie and Hellman. “Privacy and Authentication: An Introduction to Cryptography,” pp. 29-33, Proceedings of the IEEE 67(3), Mar. 1979. |
Diffie, Whitfield and Hellman, Martin E. “New Directions in Cryptography”, pp. 644-654, IEEE, Transactions on Information Theory, vol. IT-22, No. 6, Nov. 1976. |
Diffie, Whitfield and Hellman, Martin, E. “An RSA Laboratories Technical Note”, Version 1.4, Revised Nov. 1, 1993. |
Dijkstra, E.W. “Hierarchical Ordering of Sequential Processes”, pp. 115-138, Acta Informatica 1: 115-138, 1971. |
Dijkstra, E.W. 1968. “Co-Operating Sequential Processes”, pp. 43-112, In Programming Languages, F. Genuys. Ed., Academic Press, NY. |
ElGamal, Taher. “A Public Key Cryptosystem and a Signature Scheme Based on Discrete Logarithms”, pp. 469-472, IEEE, Transactions on Information Theory, vol. IT-31, No. 4, Jul. 1985. |
ElGamal, Taher. “A Subexponential Time Algorithm for Computing Discrete Logarithms”, pp. 473-481, IEEE, Transactions on Information Theory, vol. IT-31, No. 4, Jul. 1985. |
Feistel, H., “Cryptography and Computer Privacy,” pp. 15-23, Scientific American, May 1973. |
Feistel, Horst, Notz, Wm. A. and Smith, J. Lynn. “Some Cryptographic Techniques for Machine-to-Machine Data Communications”, pp. 1545-1554, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 63, No. 11, Nov. 1975. |
Feistel, Horst. “Cryptography and Computer Privacy”, pp. 15-23, Scientific American, vol. 228, No. 5, May 1973. |
Fenzl, H. and Kliner, A., “Electronic Lock System: Convenient and Safe,” pp. 150-153, Siemens Components XXI, Nov. 4, 1987. |
Fischer, Elliot. “Uncaging the Hagelin Cryptograph”, pp. 89-92, Cryptologia, vol. 7, No. 1, Jan. 1983. |
G. Davis, Marcstar.TM. TRC1300 and TRC1315 Remote Control Transmitter/Receiver, Texas Instruments, Sep. 12, 1994, 1-24. |
Godlewski, Ph. and Camion P. “Manipulations and Errors, Detection and Localization,” pp. 97-106, Proceedings of Eurocrypt 88, 1988. |
Gordon, Professor J., Police Scientific Development Branch, Designing Codes for Vehicle Remote Security Systems, (Oct. 1994), pp. 1-20. |
Gordon, Professor J., Police Scientific Development Branch, Designing Rolling Codes for Vehicle Remote Security Systems, (Aug. 1993), pp. 1-19. |
Greenlee, B.M., “Requirements for Key Management Protocols in the Wholesale Financial Services Industry,” pp. 22-28, IEEE Communications Magazine, Sep. 1985. |
Guillou, Louis C. “Smart Cards and Conditional Access”, pp. 481-489, Proceedings of Eurocrypt, 1984. |
Guillou, Louis C. and Quisquater, Jean-Jacques. “A Practical Zero-Knowledge Protocol Fitted to Security Microprocessor Minimizing Both Transmission and Memory”, pp. 123-128, Advances in Cryptology—Eurocrypt 88, 1988. |
Haberman, A. Nico, “Synchronization of Communicating Processes”, pp. 171-176, Communications, Mar. 1972. |
Hagelin C-35/C-36 (The), (1 page). Http://hem.passagen.se/tan01/C-35.HTML. Dated Sep. 3, 1998. |
Haykin, Simon, “An Introduction to Analog and Digital Communications” 213, 215 (1989). |
IEEE 100; The Authoritative Dictionary of IEEE Standards Terms, Seventh Edition, Published by Standards Information Network, IEEE Press, Copyright 2000. |
ISO 8732: 1988(E): Banking Key Management (Wholesale) Annex D: Windows and Windows Management, Nov. 1988. |
ITC Tutorial; Investigation No. 337-TA-417; (TCG024374-24434); Dated: Jul. 7, 1999. |
Jones, Anita K. “Protection Mechanisms and the Enforcement of Security Policies”, pp. 228-251, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 1978. |
Jueneman, R.R. et al. “Message Authentication”, pp. 29-40, IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 23, No. 9, Sep. 1985. |
Kahn, Robert E. “The Organization of Computer Resources Into a Packet Radio Network”, pp. 177-186, National Computer Conference, 1975. |
Keeloq NTQ 105 Code Hopping Encoder, Nanoteq (Pty.) Ltd., Jul. 1993, 1-8. |
Keeloq. RTM. NTQ 115 Code Hopping Encoder, Nanoteq (Pty.) Ltd., Jul. 1993, 1-8. |
Keeloq. RTM. NTQ 125D Code Hopping Decoder, Nanoteq (Pty.) Ltd., Jul. 1993, 1-8. |
Keeloq. RTM. NTQ 129D Code Hopping Decoder, Nanoteq (Pty.) Ltd., Jul. 1993, 1-9. |
Keeloq.RTM. Code Hopping Decoder, HCS500, 1997 Microchip Technology, Inc., 1-25. |
Keeloq.RTM. Code Hopping Encoder, HCS300, 1996 Microchip Technology, Inc., 1-20. |
Kent, Stephen T. “A Comparison of Some Aspects of Public-Key and Conventional Cryptosystems”, pp. 4.3.1-5, ICC '79 Int. Conf. on Communications; Boston, MA, Jun. 1979. |
Kent, Stephen T. “Comments on 'security problems in the TCP/IP protocol suite”, Computer Communication Review, vol. 19, Part 3, pp. 10-19, Jul. 1989. |
Kent, Stephen T. “Encryption-Based Protection Protocols for Interactive User-Computer Communication”, pp. 1-121, (See pp. 50-53) May 1976. |
Kent, Stephen T. “Protocol Design Considerations for Network Security”, pp. 239-259, Proc. NATO Advanced Study Institute on Interlinking of Computer Networks, 1979. |
Kent, Stephen T. “Security requirements and protocols for a broadcast scenario”, vol. corn-29, No. 6, pp. 778-786, IEEE Transactions on Communications, Jun. 1981. |
Kent, Stephen T. et al. “Personal authentication system for access control to the Defense Data Network”, pp. 89-93, Conf. Record of Eascon 82 15th Ann Electronics & Aerospace Systems Conf.; Washington, DC; Sep. 1982. |
Konheim, A.G., Cryptography: A Primer, pp. 285-347, New York: John Wiley, 1981. |
Koren, Israel, “Computer Arithmetic Algorithms” Prentice Hall, 1978, pp. 1-15. |
Kruh, Louis. “Devices and Machines: The Hagelin Cryptographer, Type C-52”, pp. 78-82, Cryptologia, vol. 3, No. 2, Apr. 1979. |
Kruh, Louis. “How to Use the German Enigma Cipher Machine: A Photographic Essay”, pp. 291-296, Cryptologia, vol. No. 7, No. 4, Oct. 1983. |
Kuhn, G.J. “Algorithms for Self-Synchronizing Ciphers” Comsig 88, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, pp. 159-164, 1988. |
Kuhn, G.J. et al. “A Versatile High-Speed Encryption Chip”, (Presented at the INFOSEC '90 Symposium, Pretoria), Mar. 16, 1990. |
Lamport, Leslie. “The Synchronization of Independent Processes”, pp. 15-34, Acta Informatica, vol. 7, 1976. |
Lear Corporation's Memorandum of Law in Support of Its Motion for Summary Judgment; May 22, 2008. |
Linn, John and Kent, Stephen T. “Electronic Mail Privacy Enhancement”, pp. 40-43, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., 1986. |
Lloyd, Sheelagh. “Counting Functions Satisfying a Higher Order Strict Avalanche Criterion”, pp. 63-74, 1990. |
Marneweck, Kobus, Guidelines for KeeLoq.RTM. Secure Learning Implementation, TB007, 1987 Microchip Technology, Inc., 1-5. |
Massey, James L. “The Difficulty With Difficulty” (4 pages), Jul. 17, 1976. http://www.iacr.org/conferences/ec96/massey/html/framemassey.html. |
Maurizio Fragano, Solid State Key/Lock Security System, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. CE-30, No. 4, Nov. 1984, 604-607. |
McIvor, Robert. “Smart Cards” pp. 152-159, Scientific American, vol. 253, No. 5, Nov. 1985. |
Meier, Willi. “Fast Correlation Attacks on Stream Ciphers”, (Extended Abstract), pp. 301-314, Eurocrypt 88, IEEE, 1988. |
Meyer, Carl H. and Matyas, Stephen H., Cryptography: A New Dimension in Computer Data Security, pp. 237-249, 1982. |
Michener, J. R. The Generalized Rotor Cryptographic Operator and Some of Its Applications, pp. 97-113, Cryptologia, vol. 9, No. 2, Apr. 1985. |
Microchip Technology, Inc., Enhanced Flash Microcontrollers with 10-Bit A/D and nano Watt Technology, PIC18F2525/2620/4525/4620 Data Sheet, 28/40/44-Pin, .Copyright. 2008. |
Microchip v. The Chamberlain Group, Inc., (TCG019794-019873); Deposition of J. Fitzgibbon; Partially redacted; Dated: Jan. 7, 1999. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130021137 A1 | Jan 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 08873149 | Jun 1997 | US |
Child | 09489073 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12177366 | Jul 2008 | US |
Child | 13627476 | US | |
Parent | 11313331 | Dec 2005 | US |
Child | 12177366 | US | |
Parent | 10884051 | Jul 2004 | US |
Child | 11313331 | US | |
Parent | 10215900 | Aug 2002 | US |
Child | 10884051 | US | |
Parent | 09981433 | Oct 2001 | US |
Child | 10215900 | US | |
Parent | 09489073 | Jan 2000 | US |
Child | 09981433 | US | |
Parent | 08446886 | May 1995 | US |
Child | 08873149 | US |