The present application is a 35 U.S.C. §§371 national phase conversion of PCT/EP2007/005217, filed Jun. 13, 2007, which claims priority of Austrian Application No. A102/2006, filed Jun. 14, 2006, incorporated by reference herein. The PCT International Application was published in the German language.
The invention relates to a rolling mill stand for the production of rolled strip or sheet metal, with working rolls which are supported on supporting rolls or on intermediate rolls which are in turn supported on supporting rolls. At least one of these rolls has a barrel contour which runs over the entire effective barrel length and can be described by a non-linear function. The barrel contour of this at least one roll has chamfers in at least one of the marginal regions of its longitudinal extent and forms a corrected barrel contour in these marginal regions.
In four-high rolling mill stands or six-high rolling mill stands, it is common practice to equip at least the two working rolls or the two intermediate rolls (in the six-high stand), but in some cases also the supporting rolls, with a special barrel contour and to provide axially acting adjustment devices for these working rolls or supporting rolls, so that the roll nip contour can be set as a function of the current rolled strip profile.
A rolling mill stand of this type is already known, for example, from AT 410765 B. The roll barrel contour of these rolls known among specialists by the designation SmartCrown® can be described mathematically by a modified sine function. A suitable choice of the contour parameters results in this case in a cosinuoidal clear roll nip, the amplitude of which can be influenced in a directed way by the axial displacement of the rolls. The rolls of rolling mill stands may, however, also have many other barrel contours, which are for example distinguished by a contour shape that is cylindrical, bulging, concavely-convexly curved or curved in some other way.
When working rolls or intermediate rolls with the barrel contour known from AT 410765 B and cylindrically shaped supporting rolls are used in four-high or six-high rolling mill stands, as is normally customary, it is unavoidable that load distributions which are inhomogeneous occur between the supporting rolls and the directly adjacent rolls during continuous rolling operation. Since the crowning region to be covered with the aid of the contoured rolls is always determined by the requirements of the rolling process, such as, for example, by different process parameters, dimensions and deformation properties of the rolling stock, the displacement stroke of the contoured rolls is the only influencing variable with which the markedness of the inhomogeneity of the load distribution can be influenced. Such measures are characterized by the requirement for the producer of the rolling stock to produce strips and sheets with ever narrower tolerance ranges.
In addition, excessive edge pressings occur in conjunction with the other adjacent rolls, especially in the marginal regions of the supporting rolls. In order to avoid inadmissibly high edge pressings between the working rolls and supporting rolls or between the working rolls and intermediate rolls or intermediate rolls and supporting rolls, barrel ends of the rolls are usually chamfered and therefore have a clearance in these marginal regions. Clearances of this type are already known from EP 0 258 482 A1 or EP 1 228 818 A2. These clearances, in the case of contoured roll barrels, are formed in marginal regions with a barrel radius increasing toward the margin, by a cylindrical barrel end, as is illustrated in EP 0 258 482 A1, or, in the case of rolls with a cylindrical roll barrel contour, may be formed by a conical marginal region, as illustrated and described, for example, in EP 1 228 818 A2. In any event, where these known clearances are concerned, there is only a shift of the critical pressing from the barrel ends (edges) to the transition region between the remaining barrel contour and the contour of the chamfer, since, in this configuration of the chamfer, once again, a kink or bend or a kind of step formed in the contour profile of the roll barrel occurs.
WO 02/09896 A1 and WO 2005/058517 A1 disclose, for example, a two-stage rectified area of the barrel contour on working rolls in a four-high stand or on intermediate rolls on a six-high stand. Starting from the central barrel contour, a first rectified area is provided in the direction of the barrel end by applying an arc function, precisely the same problems as previously stated with respect to the earlier prior art occurring in the transitional region of the central barrel contour to the contour of the rectified areas. The first rectified area is followed by a second rectified area, which extends up to the barrel end of the roll and realizes a cylindrical barrel contour.
The object of the present invention, therefore, is to avoid the above-described disadvantages of the prior art and to propose a rolling mill stand, in which inhomogeneities in the load distribution along the contact line of the supporting rolls and their adjacent rolls is minimized and, in particular, local load peaks in the load distribution profile, especially in the edge region, are reduced and, consequently, the duration of use of the rolls and the necessary regrinding intervals are increased. Another object is to eliminate kinks, bends or steps at the transition from the barrel contour to a chamfer at an end of the roll.
A rolling mill stand for the production of rolled strip or sheet metal, includes working rolls which are supported on respective supporting rolls or are supported on intermediate rolls which are in turn supported on supporting rolls. At least one of the rolls has a barrel contour which runs over the entire effective barrel length and can be described by a non-linear function. The barrel contour of this at least one roll has chamfers in at least one of the marginal regions of its longitudinal extent and the chamfers form a corrected barrel contour in these marginal regions, so that inhomogeneities in the load distribution along the contact line of two adjacent rolls, and in particular in the region of the edges of the strip, are minimized.
In a rolling mill stand of the type initially described, the above stated object is achieved in that the corrected barrel contour is obtained by subtracting any non-linear mathematical chamfer function from the contour function described by the non-linear function, and by the pitch of the barrel contour and the pitch of the corrected barrel contour at the transition point from the barrel contour to the corrected barrel contour being identical. The non-linear function may be any suitable function, of which examples are herein disclosed. This avoids a kink, bend or step forming at or near the transition point. As a result of the foregoing, there is no local pressure and the pressure distribution along the contact length is smoother, relative to known chamfer arrangements, and the pressure distribution does not show local peaks. The subtraction feature has the effect that at a transition point, the pitch of the barrel contour and the pitch of the chamfer contour remains the same for various chamfer configurations. As a result, a clearance is achieved on the mutually opposing barrel contours of adjacent rolls along a defined chamfer length.
Very good results with regard to minimizing and equalizing the load distribution are achieved when the chamfer function is formed by a trigonometric function. It is of principal importance here that the pitch of the barrel contour and the pitch of the corrected barrel contour at the transition point from the barrel contour to the corrected barrel contour are identical. Similarly good results are also achieved when the chamfer function is formed by a sine function or a second order function, for example a parabolic function, that is, non-linear functions.
Expediently, the supporting rolls in a four-high stand and the supporting rolls or the intermediate rolls in a six-high stand are provided with a corrected barrel contour.
Further advantages and features of the present invention may be gathered from the following description of unrestrictive exemplary embodiments, reference being made to the accompanying Figures in which:
In
In the case where no completion of the barrel contours is provided, the barrel contours may also be chosen such that the contoured rolls have a positive or negative crowning.
According to an embodiment which is not illustrated, it is likewise possible in a six-high stand, in a similar way to
Altogether, chamfer functions according to the invention can also be used for producing corrected barrel contours in the case of the barrel contours illustrated in
ΔR=RC−√{square root over (RC2−(x−xS)2)}
where
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
A 1021/2006 | Jun 2006 | AT | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2007/005217 | 6/13/2007 | WO | 00 | 6/18/2009 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2007/144161 | 12/21/2007 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3857268 | Kajiwaka | Dec 1974 | A |
4519233 | Feldmann et al. | May 1985 | A |
4781051 | Schultes et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4800742 | Feldmann et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4881396 | Seidel et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4955221 | Feldmann et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5622073 | Hiruta et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
6119500 | Ginzburg et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6868707 | Nishi et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7123703 | Hausmann et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7181949 | Haberkamm et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7316146 | Seilinger et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7367209 | Ritter et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
20030164020 | Haberkamm et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20050034501 | Seilinger et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050044916 | Honjo et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
410765 | Jul 2003 | AT |
1555297 | Dec 2004 | CN |
101 02 821 | Jul 2002 | DE |
0 091 540 | Oct 1983 | EP |
0 249 801 | Dec 1987 | EP |
0 258 482 | Mar 1988 | EP |
1 228 818 | Aug 2002 | EP |
1 249 801 | Oct 2002 | EP |
1 228 818 | Nov 2008 | EP |
55-103201 | Aug 1980 | JP |
55103201 | Aug 1980 | JP |
58-187207 | Dec 1983 | JP |
59-56905 | Apr 1984 | JP |
03013218 | Jan 1991 | JP |
1816235 | May 1993 | RU |
2 115 493 | Jul 1998 | RU |
1306468 | Dec 2004 | RU |
2003125863 | Jan 2005 | RU |
2004110929 | Jun 2005 | RU |
2 268 795 | Jan 2006 | RU |
2 280 518 | Jul 2006 | RU |
1355112 | Nov 1987 | SU |
WO 0209896 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO 0209896 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO 0211916 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO 2005058517 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005058517 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2007144161 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2007144162 | Dec 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report dated Sep. 10, 2007, issued in corresponding international application No. PCT/EP2007/005217. |
Decision on Grant dated Sep. 21, 2011 issued in corresponding Russian Application No. 2009100918 with English translation (4 pages). |
Office Action mailed Aug. 28, 2012 in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/304,937. |
Opposition dated Aug. 25, 2011 issued in corresponding European Application No. 07725994.3 with English translation (25 pages). |
Jürgen Seidel, “CSP Plant Design and Roll Implications”; Vortrag and Veröffentlichung, Rolls 2003, 9-11, ICC, Birmingham, UK (2003). |
Mit nachträglichen Eriäuterungen versehene Figuren 7 and 9 (5 Seiten), (2003). |
R. Lathe et al., “Optimisation of the rolling process (pass scheduling) to avoid roll spalling and surface defects”, Final Report der European Commission, technical steel research, EUR 22054 (2006). |
“Optimising of the rolling process (pass scheduling) to avoid roll spalling and defects”, Cordis Angaben zum Veröffentlichungdatum von 2.) (5 Seiten), (2006). |
F. Decultieux et al., “Backup Roll Chamfer Design, Profile and Maintenance”, Teilablichtung aus der MS&T Conference Proceedings pp. 311-321, (2004). |
Bai Zhenhua et al., “Research of the Roll Crown Optimization on Skin Pass Mill in Baosteel 2050 Hot Rolling Plant”, Iron and Steel, vol. 37, No. 9 (2002) pp. 35-38. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090314047 A1 | Dec 2009 | US |