The present application is a 35 U.S.C. §§371 national phase conversion of PCT/EP2007/005218, filed Jun. 13, 2007, which claims priority of Austrian Application No. A1021/2006, filed Jun. 14, 2006, incorporated by reference herein. The PCT International Application was published in the German language.
The invention relates to a rolling mill stand for the production of rolled strip or sheet metal. It includes working rolls which are supported on supporting rolls or intermediate rolls. The supporting rolls, the working rolls and/or the intermediate rolls are arranged in the rolling mill stand so as to be displaced axially with respect to one another. Each working and/or intermediate roll has a curved barrel contour which runs over the entire effective barrel length and can be described by a trigonometric function. These two barrel contours complete one another in a complementary way, in the non-loaded state, solely in one specific relative axial position of the rolls of the pair of rolls.
In four-high rolling mill stands or six-high rolling mill stands, it is common practice to equip at least the two working rolls or the two intermediate rolls with a special barrel contour and to provide axially acting adjustment devices for these working rolls or supporting rolls, so that the roll nip contour can be set as a function of the current rolled strip profile.
A rolling mill stand of the generic type is already known from AT 410765 B. The roll barrel contour of these rolls known among specialists by the designation SmartCrown® can be described mathematically by a modified sine function. A suitable choice of the contour parameters results in this case in a cosinuoidal clear roll nip, the amplitude of which can be influenced in a directed way by the axial displacement of the rolls.
When working rolls or intermediate rolls with this special barrel contour and cylindrically shaped supporting rolls are used in four-high or six-high rolling mill stands, as is normally customary, it is unavoidable that load distributions which are inhomogeneous occur between the supporting rolls and the directly adjacent rolls during continuous rolling operation. Since the crowning region to be covered with the aid of the contoured rolls is always determined by the requirements of the rolling process, such as, for example, by different process parameters, dimensions and deformation properties of the rolling stock, the displacement stroke of the contoured rolls is the only influencing variable with which the markedness of the inhomogeneity of the load distribution can be influenced.
The object of the present invention, therefore, is to avoid the above-described disadvantages of the prior art and to propose a rolling mill stand, in which inhomgeneities in the load distribution along the contact line of the supporting rolls and their adjacent rolls is minimized and, in particular, local load peaks in the load distribution profile are reduced and, consequently, the duration of use of the rolls and the necessary regrinding intervals are increased.
In a rolling mill stand of the type initially described, this object is achieved in that the supporting rolls have a complementary barrel contour and a partial or full completion of the barrel contours of the supporting rolls and of the directly adjacent working rolls or intermediate rolls occurs in the non-loaded state.
In a four-high stand, this partial or full completion of the barrel contours relates to the two supporting rolls and the in each case adjacent working rolls. In a six-high stand, this partial or full completion of the barrel contours relates to the two supporting rolls and the in each case adjacent intermediate rolls.
From the point of view of process control, a short displacement stroke of the working rolls as possible is advantageous, since both the displacement time and the displacement guides to be provided in the plant can consequently be kept short. However, a short displacement stroke has the effect that, in the case of a predetermined set profile region of the working rolls, greater differences in diameter over the barrel length occur than with a longer displacement stroke. These disadvantages arising from a short displacement stroke can be reduced appreciably by the complementary completion of the barrel contours of the supporting rolls and of adjacent rolls.
According to one possible embodiment of the invention, the rolls in the rolling mill stand are oriented such that a full completion of the barrel contours of the supporting rolls and of the directly adjacent working rolls or intermediate rolls occurs in the nondisplaced state of the directly adjacent working rolls or intermediate rolls.
However, since the maximum displacement stroke, as a rule, is substantially shorter than the roll barrel length, even in a displaced state of the rolls, substantially smaller nips occur between the rolls in the non-loaded state than in the case of cylindrical supporting rolls, and therefore an approximately homogeneous load distribution between the rolls is obtained in each operating state.
According to a further possible embodiment of the invention, the basic object is also achieved when an incomplete completion of the barrel contours of the supporting rolls and of the directly adjacent working rolls or intermediate rolls occurs in the nondisplaced state of the directly adjacent working rolls or intermediate rolls, on the condition that, in the case of a supporting roll radius RB(x) according to the formula
RB(x)=R0+k·rB(x), where
RB(x) is the supporting roll radius at the point x of the axial supporting roll extent,
R0 is the radius offset,
rB(x) is the contour at the point x of the axial supporting roll extent, and
k is a correcting factor,
the correcting factor k is being fixed in the interval 0<k≦2, excluding the value k=1.
This formalism can be illustrated on the basis of a consideration of the geometric relations in a full completion of the roll barrel contours of a supporting roll and of its adjacent roll.
In a full completion of the roll barrel contour of the supporting roll and of the adjacent roll (intermediate roll or working roll), the axes of the two rolls are parallel in the non-loaded state. For the radii of the rolls, this means:
RN(x)+RB(x)=A
where
RN(x) is the radius of the adjacent roll at the point x,
RB(x) is the radius of the supporting roll at the point x, and
A is the distance between axes.
The contour of the supporting roll is also in this case determined completely by the definition of the contour of the working roll or intermediate roll. The radius is in this case composed of an offset value R0 and of the actual contour rB which represents a modified sine function:
RB(x)=A−RN(x)=R0+rB(x)
where
R0 is the radius offset, and
rB(x) is the contour at the point x.
An incomplete completion therefore occurs when the contour function rB is modified by a correcting factor k. There follows from this:
RB(x)=R0+k·rB(x)
where
k is the contour factor (k≠1).
In the event that k=1, the full completion of the roll barrel contours is obtained. In the case of a deviation of the contour factor k from the value k=1, a full completion of the roll barrel contours is no longer afforded. The contour factor may be greater than or less than 1. The position of the extreme points and of the inflection points of the roll barrel contour in this case remains unchanged. If the contour factor k assumes the value 0, the supporting roll barrel contour becomes cylindrical. A sufficient minimization of the inhomogeneities in the load distribution along the roll barrel contour is achieved by means of correcting factors in the selected range 0<k≦2, excluding the value k=1.
In order to avoid inadmissibly high edge pressings between the working rolls and supporting rolls or between the intermediate rolls and supporting rolls, barrel ends of the rolls are usually chamfered and therefore have a clearance in these marginal regions. Clearances of this type are already known from EP 0 258 482 A1 or EP 1 228 818 A2. These clearances, in the case of contoured roll barrels, are formed in marginal regions with a barrel radius increasing toward the margin, by a cylindrical barrel end, as is illustrated in EP 0 258 482 A1, or, in the case of rolls with a cylindrical roll barrel contour, may be formed by a conical marginal region, as illustrated and described, for example, in EP 1 228 818 A2. In any event, where these known clearances are concerned, there is only a shift of the critical pressing from the barrel ends (edges) to the transition region between the remaining barrel contour and the contour of the chamfer, since, in this configuration of the chamfer, once again, a kink in the contour profile of the roll barrel occurs.
In order further to equalize the load at the end regions of the roll barrels and consequently reduce peak loads caused by pressing, the barrel contour of the working rolls or of the intermediate rolls or of the supporting rolls has, in at least one of the marginal regions of their longitudinal extent, chamfers which in these marginal regions form corrected barrel contours which are obtained by subtracting any mathematical chamfer function from the contour function, the pitch of the barrel contour and the pitch of the corrected barrel contour at the transition point from the barrel contour to the corrected barrel contour being identical.
Very good results with regard to minimizing and equalizing the load distribution are achieved when the chamfer function is formed by a trigonometric function. Similarly good results are also achieved when the chamfer function is formed by a sine function or a second order function, for example a parabolic function.
Further advantages and features of the present invention may be gathered from the following description of unrestrictive exemplary embodiments, reference being made to the accompanying Figures:
In
According to an embodiment which is not illustrated, it is likewise possible in a six-high stand, in a similar way to
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
A 1021/2006 | Jun 2006 | AT | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2007/005218 | 6/13/2007 | WO | 00 | 10/22/2009 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2007/144162 | 12/21/2007 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3857268 | Kajiwaka | Dec 1974 | A |
4519233 | Feldmann et al. | May 1985 | A |
4781051 | Schultes et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4800742 | Feldmann et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4881396 | Seidel et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4955221 | Feldmann et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5622073 | Hiruta et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
6119500 | Ginzburg et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6868707 | Nishi et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7123703 | Hausmann et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7181949 | Haberkamm et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7367209 | Ritter et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
20030164020 | Haberkamm et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20050034501 | Seilinger et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050044916 | Honjo et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
410765 | Jul 2003 | AT |
2018261 | Nov 1994 | CA |
1555297 | Dec 2004 | CN |
101 02 821 | Jul 2002 | DE |
0 091 540 | Oct 1983 | EP |
0 249 801 | Dec 1987 | EP |
0 258 482 | Mar 1988 | EP |
0 401 685 | Mar 2000 | EP |
1 228 818 | Aug 2002 | EP |
1 249 801 | Oct 2002 | EP |
1 228 818 | Nov 2008 | EP |
55-103201 | Aug 1980 | JP |
56030014 | Mar 1981 | JP |
58-187207 | Nov 1983 | JP |
59-56905 | Apr 1984 | JP |
03013218 | Jan 1991 | JP |
2001252705 | Sep 2001 | JP |
1355112 | Apr 1983 | RU |
1816235 | Jun 1987 | RU |
2 115 493 | Jul 1998 | RU |
SU 1306468 | Dec 2004 | RU |
2003125863 | Jan 2005 | RU |
2004110929 | Jun 2005 | RU |
2 268 795 | Jan 2006 | RU |
2 280 518 | Jul 2006 | RU |
WO 0209896 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO 0211916 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO 03022470 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 2005058517 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2007014161 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO 2007144161 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2007144162 | Dec 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Decision on Grant dated Sep. 21, 2011 issued in corresponding Russian Application No. 2009100918 with English translation (8 pages). |
Opposition dated Aug. 25, 2011 issued in corresponding European Application No. 07725994.3 with English translation (25 pages). |
Jürgen Seidel, “CSP Plant Design and Roll Implications”; Vortrag and Veröffentlichung, Rolls 2003, 9-11, ICC, Birmingham, UK (2003). |
Mit nachträglichen Eriauterungen versehene Figuren 7 and 9 (5 Seiten)(2003). |
R. Lathe et al., “Optimisation of the rolling process (pass scheduling) to avoid roll spalling and surface defects”, Final Report der European Commission, technical steel research, EUR 22054 (2006). |
“Optimising of the rolling process (pass scheduling) to avoid roll spalling and surface defects”, Corids Angaben zum Veröffentlichungdatum von 2.) (5 Seiten) (2001-2004). |
F. Decultieux et al., “Backup Roll Chamfer Design, Profile and Maintenance”, Teilablichtung aus der MS&T Conference Proceedings pp. 311-321(2004). |
Bai Zhenhua et al., “Research of the Roll Crown Optimization on Skin Pass Mill in Baosteel 2050 Hot Rolling Plant”, Iron and Steel, vol. 37, No. 9 (2002) pp. 35-38. |
International Search Report dated Sep. 11, 2007, issued in corresponding international application No. PCT/EP2007/005218. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100031724 A1 | Feb 2010 | US |