This application is a U.S. National Stage Application of International Application No. PCT/EP2010/066776 filed Nov. 4, 2010, which designates the United States of America, and claims priority to AT Patent Application No. A1955/2009 filed Dec. 10, 2009, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
The disclosure relates to a rolling stand for producing rolled strip having working rolls which are supported on supporting rolls or intermediate rolls and supporting rolls, wherein the working rolls and/or intermediate rolls and/or supporting rolls are arranged in the rolling stand so as to be displaceable axially relative to one another, and each roll of at least one roll pair formed from a supporting roll and a working roll or from a supporting roll and an intermediate roll has a curved contour which runs over the entire effective barrel length.
WO 2007/144162 A1 discloses a rolling stand in the case of which the barrel contour of the rolls is described by a trigonometric function. In the non-loaded state, a partial or complete supplementation of the barrel contour of the supporting rolls and of the directly adjacent working rolls or of the intermediate rolls occurs. In the case of the rolling stand known from WO 2003/022470 A1, too, the barrel contour follows a trigonometric function.
In the case of very wide rolling stands, however, it has been found in practice that high pressures occur, particularly when rolling wide strips and under a high level of loading, in the marginal regions of the rolls. This effect is undesirable and is intensified with an increasing working roll diameter, and also by the use of roll bending. This problem is not limited to a specifically formed camber of the rolls, but rather also arises in principle in the case of rolls with a conventional camber.
In one embodiment, a rolling stand is provided for producing rolled strip having working rolls which are supported on supporting rolls or intermediate rolls and supporting rolls, wherein the working rolls and/or intermediate rolls and/or supporting rolls are arranged in the rolling stand so as to be displaceable axially relative to one another, and each roll of at least one roll pair formed from a supporting roll and a working roll or from a supporting roll and an intermediate roll has a curved contour which runs over the entire effective barrel length, characterized in that the contour of the supporting roll is predefined by a contour function which is formed from a superposition of a first contour function, which runs in a manner complementary to the adjacent working roll in a non-displaced state, with a superposition function which is concave or convex in relation to the supporting roll axis.
In a further embodiment, the contour function of the supporting roll is formed by subtraction of the first contour function and of the concave superposition function. In a further embodiment, the contour function of the supporting roll is formed by addition of the first contour function and of the convex superposition function. In a further embodiment, the first contour function is formed from contour portions which are alternately concavely and convexly curved, as seen in the barrel direction, wherein the contour function is described by a trigonometric function. In a further embodiment, the first contour function is formed from contour portions which are alternately concavely and convexly curved, as seen in the barrel direction, wherein the contour function is described by a polynomial function. In a further embodiment, the superposition function is formed by a function which is monotonic on both sides and symmetrical with respect to the barrel center. In a further embodiment, the superposition function is formed by a polynomial function. In a further embodiment, the superposition function is formed by a trigonometric function. In a further embodiment, the superposition function is formed by a circular function. In a further embodiment, the superposition function is formed by a power function. In a further embodiment, the contour of the supporting roll has a marginal chamfer in each case in the marginal region thereof.
In a further embodiment, the contour of the supporting roll is formed in accordance with the equation
where
Example embodiments will be explained in more detail below with reference to figures, in which:
Some embodiments provide a rolling stand in which, for example when a wide rolled strip is produced and rolled under a high level of loading, the maximum pressures acting on the working roll and supporting roll are lower, such that roll lives can be increased and roll breakages can be avoided as far as possible.
Some embodiments feature an additional formation of a convex curvature on a supporting roll having a curved contour which is known per se, i.e., the deliberate increase in the diameter of this roll in a central region. This additional curvature can be produced in such a way that a superposition function is superposed in the camber of the rolls, proceeding from a first contour function which runs in a manner complementary to the adjacent working roll. This superposition function can run convexly or concavely in relation to the supporting roll axis, depending on whether it is subtracted or added. This superposition has the effect that a convex curvature is formed in the center of the supporting roll, and therefore, in the non-loaded state, there is no longer complementary supplementation of adjacent rolls, but rather a progressively increasing gap is formed in the direction of the margin of the rolls. The symmetry of the load distribution is retained even so. The additionally formed curvature makes the load between the supporting roll and the directly adjacent roll (working roll or intermediate roll) more uniform. In other words, the pressure distribution between the supporting roll and the adjacent roll is made more uniform by the supporting roll contour formed as disclosed herein. Linear load peaks are reduced. As a result of this, the risk of cracking or even roll breakage is lower. The roll life is higher. A gap to the adjacent roll which increases outward in the non-loaded state is formed in the regions lying outside the center by virtue of the formation of the supporting roll contour as described herein. This has the further effect that the action of the roll bending is enhanced. The profile and surface evenness of the rolled strip can thereby be controlled more effectively during production.
In one embodiment, a superposition function which is concave in relation to the supporting roll axis is subtracted from the first contour function. In the camber of the rolls, this subtraction can be realized very easily.
In an alternative embodiment, during the production of the contour of the supporting roll, a superposition function which is convex in relation to the supporting roll axis is added to the first contour function. Here, too, the desired thickened portion is produced in the barrel center of the supporting roll.
In one embodiment, the first contour function is formed from contour portions which are alternately concavely and convexly curved, as seen in the barrel direction, wherein the contour function is described by a trigonometric function. As a result, the desired additional convex curvature in the barrel center of the supporting roll can be realized very easily in the case of rolls with a trigonometric contour mentioned in the introduction Background.
In one embodiment, the first contour function is formed by a polynomial function.
In another embodiment, provision can be made for the superposition function to be formed by a function which is monotonic on both sides and symmetrical with respect to the barrel center.
The superposition function can also be formed by a polynomial function, a trigonometric function, a circular function or a power function.
In a particular embodiment, the contour is formed in accordance with the equations
where
RU radius of the upper supporting roll
RL radius of the lower supporting roll
x axial position with respect to the roll center
c contour displacement
Ro roll radius offset
A contour coefficient
φ contour angle
LREF camber reference length
B tilting coefficient
C second order coefficient (C>0).
The square term C*x2 brings about a superposition of a parabolic contour with the trigonometric contour found in rolls which are mentioned in the Background and known in conventional systems. If the coefficient C were zero, the two adjacent rolls supplement one another again in a complementary manner in the load-free, non-displaced state.
The result of this superposition is an additional camber of the supporting roll 2 in the region of the barrel center 4. This profile form can easily be gathered from the graphic illustration of
The effect of the supplementation of the barrel contour is explained below on the basis of
The graphic illustration of the result of the calculation clearly shows that, even in the case of wide rolling stands having supporting rolls which have been deliberately cambered in the center, load peaks can be reduced and the load distribution can be made more uniform.
This equalization of the load distribution provided by the techniques disclosed herein may increase the roll life and the risk of cracking or even roll breakages may be reduced.
The effect of the equalization of the load distribution is of course not limited to the four-high rolling stand mentioned above, but instead also leads to a reduction of load peaks and to equalization of the load profile in the case of the load distribution between intermediate rolls and supporting rolls in a six-high rolling stand.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
A 1955/2009 | Dec 2009 | AT | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2010/066776 | 11/4/2010 | WO | 00 | 9/21/2012 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2011/069756 | 6/16/2011 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3387470 | Smith, Jr. | Jun 1968 | A |
4519233 | Feldmann | May 1985 | A |
4781051 | Schultes | Nov 1988 | A |
4798074 | Feldmann et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4800742 | Feldmann | Jan 1989 | A |
4805433 | Rennebaum | Feb 1989 | A |
4881396 | Seidel | Nov 1989 | A |
5622073 | Hiruta | Apr 1997 | A |
6119500 | Ginzburg | Sep 2000 | A |
8413476 | Seilinger | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8881569 | Seilinger | Nov 2014 | B2 |
20050034501 | Seilinger | Feb 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
87 1 04310 | Feb 1988 | CN |
1555297 | Dec 2004 | CN |
101466483 | Jun 2009 | CN |
101511498 | Aug 2009 | CN |
2736233 | Feb 1978 | DE |
2736233 | Feb 1978 | DE |
3602698 | Oct 1986 | DE |
3620197 | Dec 1987 | DE |
0091540 | Oct 1983 | EP |
0258482 | Sep 1986 | EP |
0249801 | Jun 1987 | EP |
61-092704 | May 1986 | JP |
61092704 | May 1986 | JP |
2571845 | Jan 1997 | JP |
03022470 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 03022470 | Mar 2003 | WO |
2007144161 | Dec 2007 | WO |
2007144162 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2007144161 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2007144162 | Dec 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International PCT Search Report, PCT/EP2010/066776, 4 pages, Apr. 12, 2011. |
Notice of Opposition issued in European counterpart patent No. EP2509723 dated Jul. 13, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130008220 A1 | Jan 2013 | US |